Gang Stalking

A upto date blog about my adventures with gangstalking. This is my way of sharing with the world what gang stalking is really like. Some helpful books. Gang Stalking Books Mobbing Books

Friday, April 30, 2010

Gang Stalking Initiatives

A poster wrote in to clarify my opinion as to why I distance myself from some Gang Stalking initiavites. He asked me specifically about Ms. White and here is my response.

Ms White does several things that I am personally not in accord with.

She focuses on the Stalking aspect of Gang Stalking. Nothing wrong with that, but the few times I have come across her initiatives she has focused on linking this primarily to stalking and changing those laws. Nothing wrong with that, but I don’t believe this will change what is happening to Gang Stalking targets. Changing stalking laws will not change community notifications if that is what we are looking at. You have to name it if you are going to claim it.

I have always focused on the mobbing aspect of this harassment and focusing on the stalking aspect in my opinion is going to be less effective. I have from the start believed that mobbing and the way mobbing targets emotionally act out, best corrolates to the Gang Stalking movement.

Ms White has often criticized websites as bad sites, poison sites, etc, for linking the Gang Stalking harassment to government and state initiatives. That fine, yet other sites seem to get a pass for doing the same thing, and she manages to keep them off her credibility review websites. Ms White has continued to advocate Terrorist Stalking in America, a book that links Gang Stalking first to Stalking crews then to terrorists. She is always asking for proof, when someone mentions the government, yet never has the same issue with openly advocating something that even in her words has a wrong conclusion. She should be also screaming for proof on the Terrorist Stalking book but fails to. This seems to be a double standard that she has. I would love to see the book on her credibility review site, which I feel she covertly uses to attack others, under the guise of these reviews, but she is allowed to do what she wants to.

Ms White in my opinion often leads targets in directions that I do not often agree with. I think her site has loads of useful and valuable information, but when new targets come online, I just need it to be very clear that I am not affiliated with many of her initiatives. All too often they think that all sites share the same opinions and we often do not. In distancing myself from her initiatives, I hope to move targets in more useful directions. Get them more streamlined with things that might help them.

I have been on Eleanor’s forum, things always seem to move forward, but nothing ever seems to actually get done, but she conducts them very professionally. I just feel that we often disagree in various ways and I just like that to be made clear.

The FFCHS site is currently working with John Hall and a politician on laws that I don’t think will fix the problems in the Gang Stalking community. John Hall if focusing on Satalights, which is fine, but to get to the heart of the problem, I think the local initiatives like community notifications need to be addressed. They are getting good press and it feels like things are happening, like things are going forward, but like the time they got targets to write in with information about a multiple lawsuit, I don’t think this will work any better. Thus I don't want targets linking the two, and thinking that we all share the same ideas. Thus even when laws get passed the angle that is being taken I don’t feel will move things along the way that they need to go, in the direction that they need to go in. That is why I personally have chosen to distance myself from the direction that those initiatives have moved in.

I also had a discussion with a lawyer, who blasted all the Gang Stalking sites, and I asked why? It was because he had a disagreement with FFCHS and possibly Eleanor and thus he wrote off all the Gang Stalking sites. This really opened my eyes, and I didn’t think that was fair. So thus now, it’s made very clear that not all Gang Stalking sites share the same views. Thus if I do an initiative that they don’t agree with, they are not linked and visa versa.

I also have distanced myself from a poster who suggests that targets write a wild Freedom Of Information Act request. I do agree and fully support Freedom Of Information Act requests. I don’t support what was being suggested. Everytime certain fractions and their so called authority are challenged, character assassinations begin by their members, and those affiliated with those movements, they have a consistent habit of doing so, and thus one more reason I often choose to disassociate. Very simple really.

Lastly those fractions prefer to call this Organized Stalking, and sometime ago, I had to really fight to keep the term Gang Stalking after Eleanor decided that Organized Stalking was the term to use. She tried to have the term annexed after four years of really hard work to get the term popularized, in favor of a term most that is not as popular and would have set the movement back. Again at that time, I had to have unneeded character assassinations from some of their members, website attacks, which always happens when openly disagreeing with them. So now I am just very clear about which direction I am going in and which direction they are going in.

Some see this distancing as attacks on those sites, but it's really just to ensure my initiatives do not affect them, and visa versa.

I hope this answers your question.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Community Notifications and Gang Stalking

At this stage it’s assumed that the targets friends or family are contacted via mail or some other method, given the notification, and then they probably have some kind of confidentially agreement or none disclosure agreement that they have to adhere to. Via Occupation health and safety workers have the right to know how to protect themselves from individuals who have a history, or who have displayed inappropriate or violent behaviour.

To give you an idea of the emotional impact that keeping quite on a similar topic would have, there was a story in the paper about a man who received a national security letter. This is completely different than a none disclosure agreement. He emotional felt like he was having a breakdown by not being able to say anything to his girlfriend, and was often forced to lie. That's the sort of impact that sort of required confidentially can have on an individual.

What targets are asked to sign once they get notification would be more of a none disclosure agreement.

[quote]Not only will this program used the civil servant already mentioned, but it will expand who is used in the program. They will have secret sources of communication available to them. The members of these programs will connect with the fusion centers. None disclosure agreement or a confidential disclosure agreements will be signed by many in these programs to ensure that the information is protected.[/quote]

They might feel empowered to make a citizens arrest even. The workers would be trained in proper methods of communicating safety codes and sign language. I know this notification system is suppose to be a wonderful thing, but parts of it remind me of my research on the Stasi and how the one handed sign language was used there. Eg. Snitches were taught the one handed sign language and then they too became a part of the system.

They use this secret code the same way any cult does, Gang, or secret society does and for those on the outside they are harassed, or the citizens who have been taught these health and safety signs choose not to work with those who are not a part of the system. In England where Masons used a similar structure of silence and secrecy, they are now forced to disclose if they are Masons, because the allegiance went above and beyond the loyalty to the law and in many cases maybe even above and beyond doing what was right.

[quote]The following instruction sets out guidance governing the membership by members of the armed forces of societies such as freemasons: there is no intention or policy to preclude service personnel from membership of any lawful and benevolent organisation. However, involvement in organisations of a secretive nature, such as the freemasons, carries with it the risk of establishing disparate loyalties which may have a destabilising influence on the chain of command, not least by the perception of preferential treatment and undue influence. While membership of such organisations is clearly a matter for the individuals concerned, serving personnel should not encourage or promote membership amongst their colleagues, meetings should not be held on MOD premises, and use should not be made of any MOD property.

Ministry of Defense
United Kingdon
New 2001 Department Policy on Freemasonry in the Military

This is nothing against Masons, I am just pointing out that in the U.K. it became a real problem and disclosure for a time became mandatory.That recently changed for Judges again, where it's no longer mandatory.

I also suspect, but at this stage can not prove that this is probably what triggers some of the bullying in schools, and the mobbing in the workplace. Targeting those not taking part in this system. "However, involvement in organisations of a secretive nature, such as the freemasons, carries with it the risk of establishing disparate loyalties which may have a destabilising influence on the chain of command, not least by the perception of preferential treatment and undue influence. " Preferential treatment for members of the one handed sign language gang would be bad enough, but they are bullying, mobbing, harassing and systemically destroying those who are not a part of this and that is wrong.

I have and can bear witness of this preferential treatment for these club members or whatever they think of themselves as, and it's not a club that I want anything to do with, because I have seen what they do to none club members, the last decade of my life has been a testament to that. In court hearing they try to use this to influence judges to curry favor, by identifying themselves as part of this program (system). It also happens in everyday life, like waiting and keeping a bus door open for someone who is a member vs someone who is not. I get that people want to support others who are part of this structure, remember the majority of people think that this is a good thing. There are aspects of this that are good, don't get me wrong. A community coming together to look after itself and protect itself can be a beautiful thing, but from the side that I have lived, it's been a nightmare, and no one should have to experience such systemic destruction. This happened to me because officially because I fought back about some workplace harassment, but unofficially I think someone who knew how this system worked had a grudge against someone else used it to get revenge. Eg. If you know how this system works, you provoke the person till they yell or lash out, bait them, then report them. Get them flagged.

After spending over 10 years mobbed, and Gang Stalked, I can truly say that this is the most evil thing that I have ever seen.

I also believe that this is similar to the end time structure. What I have seen of the conformaty, the way they try to bully people to take part reminds me of that same structure that has been spoken about.

Right now what happens to targets is their lives are systemically destroyed. People don’t want to work with them etc. The end time structure is not just a mark of (the beast) a person, it’s also a system were you can not buy, trade, sell without it. This notification system is conditioning people to comply, and to harass those who are not complying, or taking part with this system.

I think in a generation, they could socially condition people to believe that only those with the external mark in the forehead or hand are people who they should do business with, and what socially they can not enforce, there will be laws to back up.

Thousands of people are being eliminated from communities, usually the outspoken, and others, those not falling in line, via these notification systems. Can you imagine how many innocent people are in jails, institutions, homeless, committed suicide, or killed people because of this system? Will there ever be an apology? Will they review the files of those in mental wards who claimed that they were being followed around? The police and other agency reports of Gang Stalking?

People want the elites to take responsibility for their actions, but what about taking responsibility for their own individual actions? No it’s far easier to say that an authority figure made me do it and I was just following orders. That excuse worked in Germany as well, it's the same types of structures repeating, where people get rid of those that they are told are undesirable. You get an excuse to do mean things to those the state has a problem with.

I can’t right the wrongs of the past, but I would ask that those in the know do something, ask for a review of this system, because the way it's working right now, is not right. The systemic destruction of innocent individuals is just wrong, and the way it's being used in that capacity is just evil.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, April 26, 2010

Credibility Reviews

What informants like to do. They like to use good information to pimp their websites. Mixing in the bad with the good.

I recently came across a video using the book Bridging The Gap. Now the video is for the website multistalkervictims.

This site belongs to a person named Eleanor White. Eleanor decided to create what she calls a credibility website. On that website she uses it to descredit sites. I have spoken to her about this practice, and what I think of it, but the practice still continues.

She has never reviewed FFCHS or The Hidden Evil, but she was kind enough to review Gang Stalking World. Needless to say, I have blogged several times about what I think about this.

On that site she also used the oppertunity to try to descredit the book Bridging The Gap, which has done well despite her.

This is not about Eleanor. I deeply disagree with her actions, but I am not saying anything bad about her in this post. I have pointed out several times what I think she is using the site for, I think it's horrible, because new targets come online and they might be naive enough to take her at her word, thus making them avoid sites that are actually there to help them, but that is the idea right.

The video that I came across though well done, uses several books, to pimp the multistalkervictim site, which is Eleanor, whites site. The videos seem to link several books to these sites, when in fact they have nothing to do with it. It's not a big deal in the short term, but in the long term I think it's what informants do. They use credible inforamtion to link to sites that might not be affliated to that source.

Eg. It would be like me using Terrorist Stalking In America to link it to Gang Stalking World. The two should never meet, it would be a classless move and simply not well done.

Anyways in my opinion if books are going to be used to pimp sites, then they should use information that those sites approve. I don't think informants can use any old book to pimp any old site. Just my opinion.

This practice don't not pass my credibility review and it's not ok.

I think informants can cross many lines, but this is not one of them.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, April 24, 2010

The Dark Side

Many times on the news you hear a report about a shooting, killing or violent incident and the person at the heart of the incident is passed off as mentally ill, and the society reacts by creating additional laws to protect themselves from the mentally ill.

What many in society still do not understand or realize is that there is a dark side to many of those shootings and violent incidents, there is a dark side that society would rather not have you know about. A dark side that happens masked just below the public's eye and awareness, but that is often very real and traumatizing for the Targeted Individual.

In many of these cases if you look deeper into these incidents you will often discover that there was more to the story. Before the target had a history of "mental illness", the target often had complaints of mobbing, bullying, or harassment of some kind. Often times the Target might not even have a term to go with the form of harassment that is happening to them. They often describe individuals around them, or even complete strangers as being mean, taunting, doing little incidents to provoke them. Many of these targets have complained for years about the targeting, but with each successive complaint their actions are often passed off as mental illness. Their very real concerns that some type of organized or systemic harassment, is happening around them often goes unheeded, unheard, and the target might even be forcefully committed by concerned family. When the reality is that the target has been exposed continually overtime to a psychological operation of harassment and provocations, that would be capable of breaking down most of the sane of individuals.

Recently society has become more familiar with terms such as mobbing and bullying.
Mobbing in the context of human beings either means bullying of an individual by a group in any context, or specifically any workplace bullying.

Though the English word mob denotes a crowd, often in a destructive or hostile mood, German, Polish, Italian and several other European languages have adopted mobbing as a loanword to describe all forms of bullying including that by single persons. The resultant German verb mobben can also be used for physical attacks, calumny against teachers on the internet and intimidation by superiors, with an emphasis on the victims' continuous fear rather than the perpetrators' will to exclude them. The word may thus be a false friend in translation back into English, where mobbing in its primary sense denotes a disorderly gathering by a crowd and in workplace psychology narrowly refers to "ganging up" by others to harass and intimidate an individual.

Research into the phenomenon was pioneered in the 1980s by German-born Swedish scientist Heinz Leymann, who borrowed the term from animal behaviour due to it describing perfectly how a group can attack an individual based only on the negative covert communications from the group".[3]

Mobbing is also found in school systems and this too was discovered by Dr. Heinz Leymann. Although he preferred the term bullying in the context of school children, some have come to regard mobbing as a form of group bullying. As professor and practising psychologist, Dr. Leymann also noted one of the side-effects of Mobbing is Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and is frequently misdiagnosed. After making this discovery he successfully treated thousands of mobbing victims at his clinic in Sweden.

In the book MOBBING: Emotional Abuse in the American Workplace, the authors say that mobbing is typically found in work environments that have poorly organized production and/or working methods and incapable or inattentive management and that mobbing victims are usually "exceptional individuals who demonstrated intelligence, competence, creativity, integrity, accomplishment and dedication".[4]

UK Anti-bully pioneers Andrea Adams and Tim Field used the expression workplace bullying instead of what Leymann called "mobbing" although workplace bullying nearly always involves mobbing in its other meaning of group bullying.

In the following article some stories of workplace mobbing are shared.

Workplace Violence:

Why it happens. Why it will continue.

“The tiny percentage of mobbing victims – like Pierre Lebrun – who lash back in violent attack would probably have lived out their lives peaceably and productively had they been spared the excruciating pain of relentless humiliation.”

~ Prof. Kenneth Westhues,
At the Mercy of the Mob: A summary of research on workplace mobbing

We’ve all seen the news reports. A lone gunman returns to his workplace or former workplace to exact revenge for harassment that has gone on sometimes for years. We learn that the gunman has lashed back in the past at those he considered to be abusing him, albeit in non-lethal ways. We are told the gunman has been disciplined in the past for his behavior (reacting to the abuse) and has been ordered to go to counselling or anger management courses. Even though the precipitating abuse may have gone on for years any response in kind gives the bullies and management the opportunity to turn the tables and claim that the victim of abuse is the real problem after all.

Of couse what we don’t hear is that the bullies provoking this reaction are almost never disciplined or required to attend counselling themselves. At this point targets of mobbing are often further humiliated by being forced to sign so-called ‘last chance agreements’ which threaten the target with termination if they dare to challenge the bullies again. So once the target of harassment returns to work after “counselling” they are greeted by cynical bullies who simply renew their attack with added vigor now that they know management will do nothing to stop them and will even join in the persecution. This tacit approval and participation by management guarantees the situation will only get worse.

News reporters interview the gunman’s co-workers, union respresentatives and managers. Those not directly implicated in the harassement of the gunman usually describe him in positive terms. For example in the OC Transpo shooting in Ottawa a co-worker of Pierre Lebrun, Ozzie Morin, commented that Pierre was “a pretty peaceful lad”, “I didn’t think he was ill. I can’t really say anything today that would say he was whacko, you know.” Another co-worker, Grant Harrison remembered Lebrun as “very clever, very nice”. 1

While those closer to the abuse, union reps for example, intent on distancing themselves from blame, respond “We’re going to look for causes but really, I don’t think we’re really going to find a cause,” said union head Paul Macdonnell. “This individual was just sick.”

The societies reaction is too often to pass the individual off as problematic, sick, disturbed, mentally ill, a violent individual. The real causes behind their violent and extreme outbursts often remain hidden. It's easier to think that we have a few individuals in society that are sick and disturbed vs the fact that we have a society that is doing sick and disturbing things to these individuals and their lives, which in turn leads to these violent outbursts and incidents.
Once educated it is easy to tell what is really happening, who the real victim is. Once it is named and brought out into the light for all to see bullies can no longer operate in the grey area. Only once everyone sees mobbing for what it is, brutal systematic psychological torture, will it become unacceptable. Only when co-workers, supervisors, department heads, HR managers, EAP providers, corporate executives, doctors, lawyers, judges and politicians understand what is being done and comprehend the staggering toll it takes on individuals, companies and society as a whole will laws proscribing mobbing become effective.

In the meantime, the body count will continue to rise.

~ Anton Hout

The body count has indeed continued to rise, but where workplace mobbing and school bullying have become more widely recognized, the issue of community mobbing and Gang Stalking are often less well known, and when violent incidents happen, society does not often readily link these incidents of violence to something more dark and insidious that might be just be happening in the community.

The mobbing community over the years has done a fantastic job of documenting the link between workplace mobbing and violent shootings. They were able to establish that in the case of many workplace shootings if you looked a little deeper there was workplace mobbing ongoing. Workplace mobbing that had gone on for years. The Target of the mobbing had often been singled out as the problem and their cries for help often lead to measures which left them unable to complain any further, take any extra internal actions, and left them at the mercy of the mob.

School shooting
Main article: School shooting

School shootings have focused attention on student bullying, with shooters in several of the worst shootings reporting they were bullied.

School shootings are a bullying-related phenomenon that receive an enormous amount of media attention. [b]An investigation undertaken by the United States Secret Service found that in over 2/3 of cases, attackers in school shooting incidents “felt persecuted, bullied, threatened, attacked, or injured by others prior to the incident” and discredits the idea that school shooters are “loners” who “just snap”.[/b] Though observing that, “clearly, not every child who is bullied in school presents a risk for targeted violence in school”, the investigation report states that, “a number of attackers had experienced bullying and harassment that was longstanding and severe. In those cases, the experience of bullying appeared to play a major role in motivating the attack at school”. The report also observes “in a number of cases, attackers described experienced of being bullied in terms that approached torment”. The report concluded that, “(t)hat bullying played a major role in a number of these school shootings should strongly support ongoing efforts to combat bullying in American schools”.[4]

Studies prompted by the shootings have shown long-lasting emotional harm to victims. The studies also revealed that bullies themselves are likely to suffer problems as children and adults.[5]

Many in the bullying feild such as the lateTim Fieldalso did a wonderful job with connecting violent school shootings with the concept that the students at the heart of many of those incidents had been bullied. He would also term the phrase bullycide to describe a young persons suicide due to bullying.

Years before bullying became well known, targets of bullying were persecuted, they suffered in silence while their cries for help were ignored. Many were made out to be disturbed or problematic individuals. The reality is that they were enduring months if not years of psychological torture and torment. The shootings gained a lot of attention, and measures were implemented to address school bullying, but years later this is still a very big problem in the school system as seen by the suicide of Phoebe Prince.
Phoebe Nora Mary Prince[1] (November 24, 1994[2] - January 14, 2010) was a teenager from South Hadley, Massachusetts. She became known throughout the United States and internationally when she committed suicide after suffering months of constant bullying from school classmates. Her death brought calls for more stringent, specific anti-bullying laws in Massachusetts. In March 2010, a state anti-bullying task force was set up as a result of her death.

In the case of workplace mobbing and bullying, the suicides don’t often get the same degree of attention that the shootings do, but they are just as important. They show the darkside of what society is capable of doing. They show a real failure of this system. They also are a striking reminder that even with all the education, lectures, documentation, there is still a long way to go towards getting this type of behaviour resolved. They show a dark side of society, and it's consistent need to feed off of their members, societies need to demean, psychologically degrade, and belittle those it perceives as weaker, deserving of punishment, or who fail to fall in line with the status quo.

Gang Stalking
What is Gang Stalking?

Gang Stalking is a systemic form of control, which seeks to destroy every aspect of a Targeted Individuals life. A target will be flagged by the community for various reasons, their information is sent out to the community at large, and they are followed around 24/7 by the members of the various communities that they are in.

The warning will go out to various places including stores, apartment rentals, future employers, communities that the target is visiting, doctors, fire departments, police, etc. A covert investigation might also be opened, and electronic, means used by the civilian spies/snitches as part of the overt and covert monitoring and surveillance process.

Individuals can be flagged designating them as having a history of aggressive or inappropriate behavior. This flagging system will follow the target if they move, change jobs, visit other areas. It let’s the community believe that they are persons who need to be watched or monitored.

“In the service sector this may require identifying to employees persons who have a history of aggressive or inappropriate behavior in the store, bar, mall or taxi.

The identity of the person and the nature of the risk must be given to staff likely to come into contact with that person. While workers have the right to know the risks, it is important to remember that this information cannot be indiscriminately distributed.

Community health and safety

A woman named Jane Clift in the U.K. went through a very similar type of flagging system. A warning marker was placed against her name designating her as potentially violent.

She sensed that, everywhere she went, there was “whispering, collaboration, people scurrying about”. “Everywhere I went – hospitals, GPs, libraries – anywhere at all, even if I phoned the fire service, as soon as my name went on to that system, it flagged up ‘violent person marker, only to be seen in twos, medium risk’.”

Violent Persons Registry

Jane Clift was targeted this way and spent four year clearing her name.

Individuals are being flagged without their knowledge. In many countries these flags might fall under community safety and health laws. It seems that employers, educational facilities, and community centers are in some cases flagging innocent individuals as a means of retaliation, silencing, or controlling members of society.

Being Bullied or Mobbed out of a job can be a devastating experience for anyone. For those who do survive it can lead to post traumatic stress disorder, or even psychiatric injury. The Target can spend years if not the rest of their lives recovering from an attack, unable to work or even attend school.
Differences between mental illness and psychiatric injury

The person who is being bullied will eventually say something like "I think I'm being paranoid..."; however they are correctly identifying hypervigilance, a symptom of PTSD, but using the popular but misunderstood word paranoia. The differences between hypervigilance and paranoia make a good starting point for identifying the differences between mental illness and psychiatric injury.

These symptoms that the target exhibits can also go ignored or misdiagnosed for years by a society that continually fails to understand the emotional and psychologically damaging effects of such practices.
Gang Stalking is experienced by the Targeted Individual as psychological attack, that is capable of immobilizing and destroying them over time. The covert methods used to harass, persecute, and falsely defame the targets often leave no evidence to incriminate the civilian spies.

It’s similar to workplace mobbing, but takes place outside in the community. It called Gang Stalking, because groups of organized community members stalk and monitor the targets 24/7.

Many Targeted Individuals are flagged, harassed and placed under surveillance in this way for months or even years before they realize that they are being targeted by an organized protocol of harassment.

The Targeted Individual community has spent the last few years playing catch up, and trying to firmly establish a coloration between incidents of violence in the community, and the very real fact that many of these individuals might just have been targets of a practice that has become known as Gang Stalking.

In the bookBridging the GapBy: GmB Bailey, there is a whole chapter demonstrating just how easily conspiracies can happen, often right under the public's scoop of visibility and awareness. With Gang Stalking the community goes into hypervigilance or vigilante mode, trying to remove an individual that they see as a danger or undesirable. The society firmly believes that it is doing something good and beneficial for the community, but in reality they are exposing these individuals to months and years of what amounts to a psychological operation, capable of breaking down and destroying the individual, or driving that person to committing acts of violence.

Over the last several years there have been several such shootings, where the individuals complained about surveillance, monitoring, harassment, people saying rude things, gaslighting, but the individuals are always written off as being mentally ill. It should be pointed noted that with school shootings the kids where once written off as kids who snapped without cause, and the same was true for workplace shootings. They were also written off as people who went postal without any cause. Once a correlation of prior complaints could be established a very different story emerged. It was then noted that in 2/3 of all school shootings the targets had complained about bullying without anything being done, and the same is true for workplace mobbing.

What the Targeted Individual community now has to establish is the link between incidents of violence in the community and these community flaggings, warning markers or listings that individuals are having added to their files, otherwise known as Gang Stalking. What needs to be established is the fact that the violence is happening in some if not most cases, not because the person is mentally ill or violent, but the actions of the community once the individual is flagged in this way, is leading to incidents of violence or mass shootings in the community. The endless community mobbing that the target experiences, which is basically amounts to a psychological operation, that goes on for months if not years, is what is leading to these incident of violence in society.

Were the following cases simply disturbed or violent individuals, or were they targets of something far deeper, something more insidious, the dark side of society?

Jiverly Wong

The news reported Jiverly Wong as a loser with a failed marriage, who had once tried to rob a bank. A person who had a history of drug abuse, and who could not hold down a job.

The story that Jiverly Wong tells is very different.

Jiverly Wong tells a story of 20 years worth of harassment, by members of the community, but mostly by police officers. He talks about rumours and slanders, he also describes what sounds similar to what Targeted Individuals describe as Electronic Harassment. When reviewing Jiverly Wong's story, it became clear that there were discrepancies. His parents had no reason to believe that he had ever been married. The bank robbery was a lie told to police which established an investigation being opened. None of Jiverly Wong's co-workers reported any type of a drug problem. His job loses were not job loses, he had worked at one company for several years then left. They report him as an excellent worker. With his second job the factory closed down and he was laid off. He then tried to take an English language class, but reportedly dropped out, most likely due to mobbing. This same school would be the focus and target of his anger.

To look at the story the media painted was to see a paranoid individual, but once society is aware of the psychological operation that goes on behind the scenes, Jiverly Wong's complaints about what happened to him become far more credible, and requires closer examination. Not just for Jiverly Wong, but for those who were the targets of his final outrage at society. If a correlation can be established, if his complaints can be verified, then maybe this can be used to make sure such incidents do not happen in future.

Kimveer Gill

Kimveer Gill in the news was painted as an anti-social young man, who one day took a gun and for no apparent reason, went on a shooting spree at Dawson College. The reports could find no reason for his shooting. The shooting was in fact attributed to the goth lifestyle and goth culture. The website was in the spotlight for weeks if not months as a possible source for individuals who might be violent.

When reviewing Kimveer Gills postings, there were little hints that something else might have been ongoing, that might have contributed to the shootings.

Dated September 12, 2006
Stop Bullying

It?s not only the bully?s fault you know!!It?s the teachers and principals fault for turning a blind eye, just cuz it?s not their job. You f*ckers are pathetic. It?s the police?s fault for not doing anything when people conplain (oops, my mistake, the cops are corrupt sons of whores,
so it?s not like they can do anything about it.)

It?s society?s fault for acting like it?s normal for people to be assholes to each other. Society disgusts me. It?s everyone?s fault for being so apathetic towards f*cking everything that doesn?t affect them personally. F*CK YOU

I wonder why my household has been under surveillance by law enforcement for 6 years now? Makes no sense to me!!

Kimveer didn't work at all in 2006, telling his mother he was tired of how people doing contract work were treated.

People kill each other

Rape women

Molest children

Deceive and betray

Destroy lives

Bullying and torturing each other at school

What kind of world is this? What the f*ck is wrong with people. This world ... this life, is worst (sic) than hell.

"Postal dude was sad before he became angry and psychotic, that's the part we never see in the game. He was normal, but the world made him the way he became."

His postings sound very rambling at first, but he talks of bullying and schools who do nothing. He talks of police who do nothing when people make complaints. He talks about his house being under surveillance for over 6 years.

It might just be the ramblings of a disturbed individual, but it's also very possible more was ongoing.
The message said that the same thing could happen again if Rajan's demands for $10 billion in compensation for both he and Kimveer weren't met.

That same day, they searched the house and discovered a three-page typewritten letter in which Rajan demanded $10 billion "for all the violations, damages, suffering" committed by citizens and the government and "for the negligence of their law enforcement agencies."

Police also found one of Rajan's chats on his computer, in which he demands $10 billion for both him and Kimveer for violations of their fundamental rights, like "freedom from torture" and the "right to paid holidays."

During his interrogation with police, he said he had no knowledge of what his friend had planned. He also said that for the past five or six months, he had developed the ability to read people's minds, had telepathic powers and had the ability to move people and animals.

Kimveer's friend Rajiv Rajan wrote some interesting postings after Kimveer's death. He wrote about damages, suffering committed by citizens, and the government. Neglegence of law enforcement agencies. Violations of his and Kimveer's fundamental rights, for freedom from torture.

Might just be the ramblings of someone who has since been diagnosed as schizophrenic with a history of depression, but his statements might also shed more light on what might really have been happening with Kimveer Gill.

Keith Deroche
Friday said the 44-year-old Deroux’s cocaine addiction was fuelling ‘paranoid delusions’ that listening devices and cameras had been placed in his apartment. The drug addict believed someone was sending him coded messages through his computer and, even after moving to a new residence, Deroux feared people were entering his house through an underground tunnel and funnelling “noxious gases” into the residence. The only person with enough resources for this kind of surveillance, Deroux figured, was his friend and cocaine dealer, Wolfgang Droege. …

Mr Deroche would then shoot and kill his friend Wolfgang Droege who he blamed for the surveillance and mishaps going on in his life. He gave what to many seemed like a wild, paranoid drug induced description of being under surveillance, gassing, harassment, people entering his home, and that it continued after he moved.

Was he just spewing out a drug induced fantasy or was he on a list, flagged, with a warning marker against his name?

Damon Thompson
The allegation against 20-year-old Damon Thompson is that on Thursday October 9, he attacked a 20-year-old female classmate Katherine Rosen. It happened in an organic chemistry class in the William Young Hall at the university sometime around midday on Thursday when Thompson allegedly pulled out a knife and stabbed Rosen five times and slashed her throat.

Thompson, an A -student with consistent excellent academic performance is an only child of Judith Brook a legal clerk with the Legal Advice and Services Centre in Belize City. While the US media has painted a negative picture of Thompson,
sources close to him and his family indicated that prior to this incident he had made countless complaints against classmates and this specific lab partner but with no results. Contrary to US media reports, Thompson did know Rosen who was his lab partner and who has been very offensive to him on previous occasions and even the day in question. Now UCLA in an attempt to shift blame away from itself has sought to discredit the mental stability of Thompson by using his many complaints by e-mail as an indication of instability.

When this story occurred, the American media painted Damon Thompson as a student that had walked into a classroom, pulled out a knife and stabbed a random student. He was immediately painted as mentally ill, and placed in jail. That is the bulk of what many will remember about this story, but digging a little deeper and told a very different story.

He had been familiar with Rosen his lab partner, he had made many complaints about harassment, and he had in particular complained about her on several occasions, but I reports of this do not seem to have been printed in the American Media.
Frank said he grew concerned about Thompson in mid-December 2008, after the student sent several e-mails complaining that classmates sitting around him had been disruptive and made offensive comments to him while he was taking a written exam.

In one of the e-mails that Frank provided to The Times, Thompson, 20, also accused Frank of taunting him.

"I believe I heard you, Professor Frank, say that I was 'troubled' and 'crazy' among other things," Thompson wrote in the e-mail. "My outrage at this situation coupled with the pressure of the very weighted examination dulled my concentration and detracted from my performance."

Frank said he was told that other professors had reported similar exchanges with Thompson, who complained he was the constant target of taunts from students across campus -- in dorms, dining areas and the library. A university official told Frank that he could only suggest that Thompson seek treatment, but they couldn't require him to seek psychological help. "My concern was in the context of other violent incidents on campuses around the country," Frank said.

To Frank, the e-mails he received from Thompson indicated the student was in need of serious help. Frank said he urged university officials to take action. An official told Frank that they could only suggest to Thompson that he seek treatment, but they could not require him to seek psychological services.

University officials have acknowledged that "Thompson was known to our student affairs office prior to the incident," but could not disclose information about the suspect, citing privacy laws.

When the story was examined a little bit closer it was clear that he had made several complaints about disruptions not only by the students around him, but also by also by professors. His complaints had not been taken seriously, infact he it seems that he was viewed as the problem for making the complaints which most often happens in cases of workplace mobbing, and habitual bullying in the schooling system. It should be noted that the professor he had accused of harassment, was the one used in the interview. What is happening in cases of this is that the system is not correcting itself, instead of tackling systemic bullying, harassment, mobbing, these individuals are all too often placed on lists, have warning markers placed against their names, or flagged, once this happens, it almost invariably leads to open season on the target by the community, and an escalation of open harassment. Then further complaints by the target are seen as a cry for mental health and not what they should be seen as, which is a system that is broken and not functioning. This is is also often a precursor to Gang Stalking, and the escalation of systemic harassment.

Abdo Ibssa
“We’ve heard him say crazy things and do crazy things,” said neighbor George Johnson. “The chip they’re talking about–I don’t know where that came from, but he kept on thinking that the government put a chip in him.”
“The suspect through the note left at his residence indicated he was upset with the doctor, thinking a chip had been placed inside of him during his appendectomy. The suspect believed he was being tracked due to this chip,” Sterling Owen IV, Knoxville’s Police Chief said.

According to the case file, which lists his name as Abdo Ibssa Mohammed, Ibssa told the court he bought his business in 2008 but wasn’t making any money. Handwritten notes indicate he was $80,000 in debt, apparently for an online school he dropped out of in 2007 “due to personal problems.”

The notes also indicate he filed no tax returns in 2008 or 2009.
Also found during the search were a second handgun, a bag of marijuana and a copy of the book “The Official CIA Manual of Trickery and Deception” — a reproduction of a Cold War-era CIA handbook on the use of illusion and deception for acts of espionage.

Ibssa was allegedly involved in a violent incident a year ago, attacking a stranger in a convenience store, according to a lawyer for the man who filed the civil suit.

Jalal Boudarga sued Ibssa for $300,000 in January, claiming Ibssa shoved him violently against his car, causing him to fall to the ground and badly break his leg. Boudarga's attorney, Jerry Martin, told The Associated Press that Ibssa believed Boudarga said something bad about him in the store.

"I guess if Mr. Ibssa imagined that a doctor had put a computer chip in him, then it's not that far of a jump for him to imagine my client saying something about him," Martin said.

It's very easy to write this man off as a paranoid and mentally ill individual. He has a history of violence, he was just committed to a mental health facility, and he was off his medication.

When you look at the story there are some question left unanswered. Why did this man feel that he was being tracked? Was he being followed, or did he think he was being tracked via electronic means? Why was there a copy of the CIA manual of Trickery and Deception? For those familiar with the techniques used in Gang Stalking rude comments by strangers, that directly correlate to the Targeted Individual are all too common and it would not be very hard to imagine that a complete stranger could indeed have made a comment to Ibssa.

The stories unlike several of the others does not go into enough details, to establish a firm correlation, in regards to what might have been happening, and the some media outlets have claimed that his neighbours are not giving interviews.

If these cases can be reviewed and it is determined that these men or some of these men were on community lists, had warning markers placed on their files, were flagged, then it might help establish a link between these community incidents of violence and these community listings, warning markers, or flags.

If these patterns can be established, then other factors such as complaints to the police and other agencies can be reviewed. Maybe then Targeted Individuals could get more understanding and awareness, vs being written off as mentally ill.

If it can be established that placing people on lists, warning markers, or flagging files causes community paranoia, harassment, mobbing, and Gang Stalking, then in future when targets complain, maybe their complaints will be taken more seriously. Right now complaints are taken as a sign of mental illness, and additional complaints are viewed the same.

The community in the meanwhile thinks that anyone flagged is a dangerous person, and someone that the need to do everything they can to protect and guard themselves against. The target is then exposed to day in day out systemic harassment, which equates to a psychological operation that is capable of driving the target to a breakdown, or acts of suicide or violence.

Community members go out of their way to do things to provoke the target, harass them in subtle ways. Each incident in and of itself means nothing, but the repeated provocations over time, lead to the headlines seen on the news. This is the dark side of society that is not seen or reported.

It took years for enough research to be put into place to establish a direct link between bullying, mobbing and acts of violence. This process within the Targeted Individual community can be more readily streamlined, by checking to see if any of these individuals had such warnings or flags on their community files.

If they do has such warnings, then it's important that this link be used to draw the correct conclusion, which would be that placing such warnings against individuals files, can and often does lead to identifiable patterns and cycles of harassment. This then causes acts of violence with in the community as the target is provoked, monitored, and psychologically harassed on a daily basis, everywhere they do. This is the conclusion that should be reached vs people on these lists are violent for no apparent reason and without any justification. It’s important to look at cause and effect.

If the communities actions are leading to these end results then it’s important to establish laws and support for targets to address this, so that fewer incidents will be caused over the next few years.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, April 23, 2010

The Dark Side

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, April 21, 2010


I am feeling that Democracy has failed in some way. Here I am, being targeted and in some ways demonized by the very democratic society and government appendeges that I trusted to protect my freedoms.

In my specific circumstances, lashing out via civil disobedience would not be a good thing. As a target I have to be extremly cognizant of how my actions will be interpreted. As a target I am aware that my actions, words, thoughts, are being scrutinized. At times they will be wrongly interpreted. What might not raise an eyebrow under normal conditions changes due to this listing/flagging. It means that handing out flyers or pamphlets in one circumstance would not draw any attention, in other the exact same actions would be interpreted as a sign of mental illness, or a disturbance to the safety of those around you. This is the kind of stuff targets have to be aware of. The very flagging in of itself without you doing anything can turn regular benign actions into these informants interpreting them in many paranoid and incorrect ways, that could affect your life.

Remember as a part of this flagging/listing we often have incidents staged to make us look as if we are a danger to society, or unsafe. No matter how many times I have pointed this out, it never fails that people consistantly believe the worst without question. It takes such a unique and special person to see past the lies, but that sort is all too often in short supply. The worst at times are those close to you. Remember you often don't have to be present, or involved in an incident, an informant can just make something up and that is enough to keep this targeting going, to keep your flagging going. Remember this was used with Jiverly Wong to help with the rumours lie and slander, that even followed him into death. Remember this is about money, the more people they have liste flagged, or that they can justify flagging, and monitoring the better it is for them. Most people will probably not want to beleive this, but that's is the truth.

Remember that they purposely try to systemically destroy our lives by making it almost impossible for us to earn an income, then if we fail to pay bills, rent, car payments, because they have limited, or restricted our ability to be self sufficient, it's then interpreted as a sign of mental illness. Where the truth is people are deliberatly going behind your back, and pulling strings to destroy your life. This will never be seen in the official interpretations, and proving that this is what is being done is almost impossible for most targets, yet we all report the same things. Life disruptions and interfarences.

It's nice to talk about democracy and how great it is, and how it protects freedoms, but what about when it's being used to destroy freedoms? what do you do then? Do you sit back silently and smile, and criticize the system, but in a way that won't upset it's little feelings? Not if you are me, if you are doing something unjust to me, most cases you will hear about it and not in a pleasent way. That is a sane and human reaction, and unless you are a watered down sheeple, most normal sane people are going to get angry about things that are unjust.

Someone like me should never have been singled out this way, but I was. Someone like me should never have had to spend the last four years getting tortured on a daily basis, but I have been, and it's completely unacceptable. Explaining electronic harassment to someone who has not been targeted by it for 8 hours straight, 24 hrs straight, or days on end is almost impossible to do. Other targets however understand this very well, and at times have talked about this very eloquently. This type of targeting is almost impossible to explain in a credible fashion.

Remember that in addition to heating up the skin, causing the skin to peel in some cases, due to the sorts of burns it causes, or causing blisters, etc, it's physically is torture. It's not like getting hit with an object because you then have the bruses to show as proof.

Yet targets often have to live with this type of targeting on a daily basis. No one to turn to, no one to cry out to, no one to care, and why? Cause in our democratic and none democratic countries alike, people determined that we did not have the same rights, and that it was ok to slander our reputations, to flag and mark us, which left us continual and perpetual targets of various communities, without even the courtesy of a warning so that we could protect ourselves. This is how democracy has worked for me and many others, and what I am saying, have been saying, and will continue to say is that this is not right. If my speach is forceful at times, try walking a week, month, year in my shoes, much less the years I have spent dealing with this. I already know most people could not. This wonderful democratic system decided that it was ok to underhandedly allow others to abuse our rights. These so called citizen informants were given a license to ill, but unlike pedophiles and serial killers who at least get notification that the communities that they are in will be notified, most of us did not even get that kind of courtesy, and we have been treated worst than many of them, cause most of us had no idea why we were being targeted, or why it was allowed to contine without any help or assistance. Yet the people who put these warning marker systems in place had to know or have some idea of the systemic destruction that would be heaped upon individuals with these markers, and thus why it's being used on whistle-blowers, minorities, single women, etc. What a sweet way to silence and destroy someone. All these human rights agencies must by now have some inclining, but still most targets could not find help.

When targets get angry, which is sane and rational under such circumstances, our rights are often further subduded even further. Our justifiable anger is used to paint us as potentially dangerous. Try having your life desrupted in this way, systemically destroyed till it's almost impossible to function and see if you would not get angry too.

People do get upset, and often for good reasons. Many of the men and women in the Gang Stalking community are being demonized, many of them are being tortured via electronic means, many are being falsely commited, put in jail, losing jobs, livelyhoods, many are innocent.

Remember this is not just something that goes on for a few months and then stops like being put on trail, this is something that goes on for years, and while it does, people that were in good jobs, go financially bankrupt, unable to take care of themselves and their families. They watch their kids getting tortured. Some of the women in our community are sexually assulted, with no one to believe them if they go to the police. What kind of democratic country does that to it's own citizens?

I think the saying he who feels it knows it can best be applied here. I think most people who have never expreienced the kind of systemic destruction can not fully understand what targets go through. This is little paper cuts daily. One in and of itself is nothing, but the continued actions over time are designed to break down the targets and leave them with no form of support, no way to support themselves, prove their innocence, and many of us are left to ask, where is democracy? How are we suppose to fight and protect it, when it's failed us so very badly? We are suppose to obstain from saying bad things, and doing bad things, but then we are suppose to sit back daily and be demonized, disinfranchized, and in other cases driven to other extremes.

In body I am reminded all too easily of the evils of this world. I don't see conspiracy cause I want to, I see conspiracy cause I am living it. Before this I truly believed that governments were there to protect the rights and freedoms of it's citizens, that things like this only happened in none democratic countries, but over a decade of workplace mobbing, Gang Stalking, and Systemic distruction, being deliberate disinfranchizement, has made me a believer.
There is something really wrong going on in these countries, something undemocratic. I have tried to write about it, blog about it and research it all in a peaceful manner. Hopeing that those so called wonderful organizations set up to guard human rights and freedoms would step up to the plate and do what they are suppose to do, they have not. It's shown me that the rights and freedoms of some citizens in these countries matter more than others.

What's happening to targets is probably something some politician will appologise for in years to come. They will come up with some appology, something along the lines of "what we did at the time was wrong, it violated the human rights of these individuals, and we are sorry," but future sorry's if we even get that, will not cut it. sorry does no good. Not for the men, women and children who are being targeted in this manner right now, by something that is highly systemic and structured. I will say it again, I don't see conspiracy because I want to, I see it because I am living it. When I read about the dirty tricks done to others under programs such as Cointelpro, a lot of those dirty tricks are being applied at a local level and that is just not right. That is not suppose to happen in these democratic countries, but it is. This system is not working for some. It's not right to say the system works, when people are disinfranchized to the edges of these systems, and put in situations where they would like to fight back, but find it almost impossible to do so, because their lives are deliberatly being disrupted. People understand systemic racism, so why should understanding systemic targeting be so hard to do?

Most of us would like to do the democratic thing, and if we had millions of dollars, we could do what John Lennon did when the system came after him, we could fight back the democratic way and win. As it stands, because of the billion and one disinfo agents online who spent years leading targets in all sorts of directions but the real one, most of us are tired physically, spent emotionally, and financially doing what we can to look after the basics. The nice thing is that I now hear other voices of dissatisfaction, people who are not targets but who feel let down by the system, who feel just as exhausted physically, emotionally spent, who are also trying to take care of their basic needs. Their voice are being heard now too, and they are expressing a great deal of dissatisfaction with these democratic systems, saying that they are just not working. Somewhere along the line the system also stopped working for them, and yes they are looking closer at government, allegances that keep people like them disinfranchised, and realizing that things might not be as fair and democractic as they too were once lead to believe. They too are starting to see conspiracy, cause when you understand how the system is working, how can you not?

[quote]Secret Banking Cabal Emerges From AIG Shadows: David Reilly [/quote]

[quote]Now we know the truth. The financial meltdown wasn’t a mistake – it was a con


The conspiracies that were once laughed at, are now being taken seriously by the mainstream, see once their lives start to be affected by it, it's a different story, now they are taking seriously what many had been saying for years.

Those legitimate voices of dissent are coming to the surface, but instead of being listened to and understood, they are being demonized, but unlike us, they at least get to hear what is being said about them.

I agree that people should take caution with how they act, what they say, even what they think at times, you never know who is watching, listening, or reading minds. On the other hand people are angry and anger that is bottled up needs a proper release. I agree that violence is not the right way to go, but people need to understand that when you disinfranchise the citizenry, when they do have a voice, or when they see deep injustices in a system that they trusted, this is a channel that some of them are going to gravitate towards. I still preach a non violent approch to resoluion, becuase my targeting has taught me why many of those who have gone before did not choose a path of violence, the state is violent and in many cases choosing such a path, will be dealt with swiftly and brutally and destroy the freedoms of others.

Many can not do what I do, blogging and writing patiently hopeing to get the right sort of attention, while my life is systemically destroyed, there are many who just can not and will not choose this path. We have seen this in America's history with their revolution, and the Frech as well, people will try to work within the system for as long as they can, and I encourage it, but when that system will not work with them, when it breaks their backs and spirits what are they to do? They have formed a tea party? I think that can be a good thing if the energy is channelled in a good way, but right now people are making them look bad, and I think the positive energy that got that movement started will be overshadowed by the bad press, which is a shame. Cause if this movement is suppressed, then smaller movements will likely spring up, and it's hard to know which direction those movements will head in.

Everyone wants democracy, I encourage people to work for it, but would ask otherst to walk a mile of understanding in the shoes of those that are being let down by these democratic systems, if you are not experiencing what it's like, you might not be able to understand where these people are coming from, there legitimate voices of dissent. There is a gap that exists for the have's and the have not's, how the system works for those with, is very different than how it works for those without. People are realising this and starting to ask why, yes it's going to make people uncomfortable, but it's better in some ways for that anger to come to the surface on forums and the like than being supressed. I also agree that at this time, it's well for those online to try to remember to be as responsible as we can. Many doing the monitoring are paranoid and innocent things that we say, are interpreted in extreme ways. Eg. I have observed that every time I would mention a specific extremist site online, I would spend about 48 hrs offline being deeply observed, and followed around in a specific manner. The people doing the monitoring are paranoid, and when dealing with the paranoid, you have to watch what you say, I take the same appoach when dealing with many of the citizen informants. Many are sane rational people trying to get through the day, many others are unhinged, and some others are following a specific agenda which is to set targets up, simply be aware and on your guard. I don't think it's a bad think to give a timely reminder for people to be aware of what is being said.

We have the right to be angry, but let's remember that we have to be careful how that anger is channelled, and try to manage our responses. Most times we type, hit send and don't think how people might be interpreting our words. On our forums 9/11 and conspiracy speaches are common, but to many others they immediately interpret this type of chatter as a danger, something to be managed or dealth with in an extreme way. It's good that we all be cognizant of that.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Mind, Body, Spirit

A short time ago I was putting these categories into separate compartments, not cause I wanted to, but because I felt that it was necessary.


Some time ago I was lucky enough in spirit to come across a situation that really helped me to get to where I wanted to be. In spirit I have been happy lately, fulfilled. I found a situation that was well matched, and well suited to my needs. A situation that I am spiritually connected to, open to at times, even starting to want to trust a little bit.

Through space, and time my request for something better was granted in a most peculiar way, that still leaves me surprised at times, but mostly smiling at others.

Where I am now in spirit from my perspective has been most wanted, welcome, and oh so needed. In some ways I am able to be more tuned into my spirit, in other ways, not so much so.


Because I have been more happy in spirit my mind has been far more engaged, and happy. Thus it's been even easier to have very little interaction with the informants. My sojourns have been pleasant. Over the last couple of days I hardly noticed them more than needed, and had no unnecessary, or unpleasant interactions with any of them.

When you are happy in spirit your mind tends to want to follow. However I am a realist and there are things of an worldly nature that must still be dealt with.


This is still a work in progress. Right now it's very different than the other areas of my life due to this type of targeting, and I wish it were otherwise. The electronic monitoring and systemic targeting continues.

What I do know is that when you are happy on one level, and the other aspects of you life are not in sync with that, you are more aware of the imbalance. It's unfortunate, and at times leaves me wishing that i could get some kind of synergy happening in all areas.

Anyways I do now realize once again that these areas are not separate as most people would like to believe. I am praying deeply that a way can be found to overcome the targeting not just for myself, but for many others. Now that I know what it is, trying to find sources that will help is the next step.

Feeling happy and settled on one level does point out the parallel circumstances more accuetly at times, but then it's also helped me to define what my ideal circumstances would be, in another way.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, April 19, 2010

Secret Society

Secret Society.

You hear a lot about this online, and people complain about secret societies, but I have been watching these citizens informants use their one handed sign language in a similar pattern and I am thinking, how can you complain about secret societies, when you are using this system the same way?

I have seen on several occasions the citizen informants use their secret signals to identify each other and do little favors or boons for each other that they would not do for others. On a more lethal level I have watched it be used to socially influence others from not doing business with a target, and I am thinking, how hypocritical. People complain about secret societies, secret codes, and how legal cases are won at the turn of special signals and so forth, but then they try to use this system in the same way. To control others, to destroy others, and I am amazed.

The other thing that I wanted to quickly address was the issue of bullying and mobbing. With the Phoebe Prince case, it just reminded me how cruel people can be at any age.

What I really wanted to address is the fact that I believe a large part of the mobbing in schools, work, community ect might also in part happen if people are not aware of, or are not using the informant signals. These informants in some cases, see this as a right to harass anyone who will not signal back at them. On a high school level all you need is a clique of kids in the know, vs those not in the know, and it's easy to see how this might be applied. Is this being applied, and is this being used in that manner to harass from the schools, work, and community those not in the know, or those not a part of this system? At this stage it's hard to know for sure, but based on past experience, I now believe that this could be a good possibility. If it is being used in this manner, then this is something that has to be looked into and sooner than later.

People talk about wanting change, but I think the only change they want is the freedom to control others even further, it's being done to them, so they get a little power and in turn oppress others the same way. If you want others to change, look about you at how this system is working, and how you are being worked by it, and in turn destroying others.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monkey's, Elephants, Frogs

How control works.

Monkey's and Society

This is how society is basically controlled. I have blogged about this before, but I thought that this would be a timely reminder. People talk about how they want change, how they are dissatisfied with governments, but then they control each other worst than any authority figures do. If people really want change and freedom, then they have to understand how this works, it's the only way that change can and will happen.

Under this informant system, it's being used as a means of state and personal control. The other slaves get pressured apply pressure on the target to conform, at times by participating in the systemic destruction of the targets life, and they hope to eventually break and destroy the target enough to control them, just like the example above. That is how state control works, and that is how it is working. The people at the bottom have to realise this, and want this to change, but most like the bit of power it gives them, that sense of control. They don't have it in their own lives, so they try to take it from others. It's really uncool, and things will not change until this happens.

Elephants and societal control

[quote]In India young elephants are tied to a tree to be taught obedience. They pull and pull but cannot break free. The elephant is still not strong enough to pull the tree out, and in time, after many attempts, it becomes to believe that it will not break free. No matter how large and strong it grows, it believes that it will never pull the tree out. At this point, an elephant can be tied to a twig and it will not attempt to break free. It will always believe that the twig is stronger than it. Do you ever feel like your stuck? But, inside you, you know there is a better way of life? And you just don’t know how? The elephant and the twig is a perfect parallel to the human condition known as “learned helplessness.” Realistically an elephant and a human have very different traits to consider this a comparison. But this particular pattern of the elephant is symbolic to how the human can be subjected to the same condition. Unlike the elephant, a human has his own will; therefore, the cycle can be broken. As a human, you were given a great power. Your mind, the mind has endless possibilities. Unfortunately, instead of living our lives freely, we have succumbed to living in environments run by systems. Sure it does make some things easier and helps keep some kind of order. On some part systems help keep things running, which is not a bad thing. The only problem with a system is that it keeps things running in one direction. It does not allow much room for change, for that would disrupt the system. As humans we are always evolving and need room to grow and change. With these systems we have been subjected to this “learned helplessness” and have become stuck living in the system. These systems reside in a family unit, a community, in professions, by traditions, and in cultures. Don’t get me wrong a system provides support to function, but the original purpose gets lost in the upkeep of the system. In other words, we are the elephants and the systems are the twigs. We must not forget our true purpose and not be afraid to disrupt the system in order for it to be re-evaluated and adjusted. Just like a computer, it is always being updated and changed to bring us better service. Imagine how far you could advance if you were to upgrade the system. Now, maintain respect to the systems but don’t be afraid to ask for upgrades.[/quote]

Once you get the people to condition themselves, very little control is needed to keep them in line. Thus we walk our selves back to work after breaks, no control, no chains needed, we learn to condition ourselves, breaking free of those conditioning is in part what being free would truly be about.

Frogs boiled alive and society

We watch our rights being eroded everyday. Body scanners, email and internet rights being removed or invaded, the water is boiling but like this helpless frog we do very little about it. We change to go along with the laws, and we are passive. Before you know it the water is too warm. This is what society is like in the 21st century.

This post is not to be confused with frogs, monkeys and state control. :-)

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, April 12, 2010



That is the best word to use to describe these people. Recently I had to find out information in regards to trying to get this stopped, not just for myself but for other targets.

The Informants went into hyper-stupidity mode. I was recently talking to someone in an official capacity, the informants interpreted this as a sign for sure of mental illness. It does not see to occur to them that in my official capacity of trying to assist myself and other targets, I now have to put in place procedures and suggestions that targets can use to get this curtailed in their lives? I am now trying to find the correct procedures and methods that current and future targets can use to gain access to their files, and what legal channels they need to take, this was what I recently set out to do.

They were not having any of that, my need to make polite inquires was surely a sign of whatever garbage they are trying to put out there about me. Logic is not something that will stop these people from their crazy beliefs. They see logic, trip over logic, pick themselves up, and just keep going. Watching them in action I am sure that many of them would fail basic tests for critical thinking. They watch me looking for signs, and I watch them thinking, Are bloody well stupid? I often can not believe that I that I let such wankers destroy my life for so long. Frenzied is the only term that I can use to describe these people.
fren·zied (frnzd)
Affected with or marked by frenzy; frantic:

The more they interact with each other,the more they feed the frenzy. It's interesting to watch, logic, and common sense just does not break through their wall of ignorance, they know what they know cause the state told them so.

Not only are they frenzied, but a lot of what they do in their official delusion that they are keeping the city safe, involves breaking the law, and that is what I was setting out to do recently, finding out what course of action is best for targets to use to start to curtail this. I have very little doubts that my progress will be impeded, but it must be done.

Again before I go further, let me state that there are sane rational citizens out there, one's who are as disgusted as I am by the crazy frenzied behaviour of the other citizens, but unfortunately too many bad apples will spoil the whole bunch. I just wanted to be clear that there are logical people out there, but more are needed.

In a given day, I touch base with quite a few individuals, responding to inquires, contacting organizations that might be able to help, researching what was at the heart of the harassment that has begun to become known as Gang Stalking. Discovering a secret flagging system for members of society, and the army of citizens that monitor those being flagged has been no easy task. Now the question is, what can targets legally do to defend themselves and to challenge what is happening? For legal challenges I think and exposure will be key strategy for curtailing much of this. A lot of what they are doing is not going to be legal. Exposing it, and helping others to understand why it's wrong to dehumanize targets will be key.

That is what I am working on, and have been working on, and will continue to work on. Any recent conversations, discussions, correspondences, therefore pertain to this. Period.

What I had the chance to observe recently is what I gleamed after reading the articles about how they arrest and forced some innocent person because he bought guns, and his employer alerted them to the fact that he might have been dangerous.

To hear them tell it they saved the day and stopped some crazy person, using the swat team to subdue him, and forcing him to get the help he needed. That's their interpretation.

[quote]To hear them tell it, the five police agencies who apprehended 39-year-old Oregonian David Pyles early on the morning of March 8 thwarted another lone wolf mass murderer. The police “were able to successfully take a potentially volatile male subject into protective custody for a mental evaluation,” announced a press release put out by the Medford, Oregon, police department. The subject had recently been placed on administrative leave from his job, was “very disgruntled,” and had recently purchased several firearms. “Local Law Enforcement agencies were extremely concerned that the subject was planning retaliation against his employers,” the release said. Fortunately, Pyles “voluntarily” turned himself over to police custody, and the legally purchased firearms “were seized for safekeeping.”[/quote]

The reality was very different. They took away this mans rights illegally. They forced their way into his home without cause, kidnapped him, forced him to have a mental evaluation without any real justification, then stole his guns. After he requested them back they then played around about giving it back till he contacted the media outlets. To this date I have not heard an apology issued for what was done. That's the reality of what they did.

[quote]This voluntary exchange involved two SWAT teams, police officers from Medford and nearby Roseburg, sheriff’s deputies from Jackson and Douglas counties, and the Oregon State Police. Oregon State Police Sgt. Jeff Proulx explained to South Oregon’s Mail Tribune why the operation was such a success: “Instead of being reactive, we took a proactive approach.”

There’s just one problem: David Pyles hadn’t committed any crime, nor was he suspected of having committed one. The police never obtained a warrant for either search or arrest. They never consulted with a judge or mental health professional before sending out the military-style tactical teams to take Pyle in.

“They woke me up with a phone call at about 5:50 in the morning,” Pyles told me in a phone interview Friday. “I looked out the window and saw the SWAT team pointing their guns at my house. The officer on the phone told me to turn myself in. I told them I would, on three conditions: I would not be handcuffed. I would not be taken off my property. And I would not be forced to get a mental health evaluation. He agreed. The second I stepped outside, they jumped me. Then they handcuffed me, took me off my property, and took me to get a mental health evaluation.”[/quote]

The problem is when people are in a frenzied state, they believe their own mythology, and nothing you say or do will convince them otherwise. The same is true for what we have to go through when dealong with frenzied people. The system has flagged us for various reasons. It no longer matters if it's true or not, if we are guilty or innocent, tell them crazy, they will see crazy, tell them terrorist and you will clear the space around you, they will believe anything and act accordingly. They also expect us to do the same, expecting us to internalize their expectations of us. Thus justifying their treatment of us. It's important that targets do not let this happen.

The Pygmalion effect, or Rosenthal effect, refers to the phenomenon in which the greater the expectation placed upon people, often children or students and employees, the better they perform. The effect is named after Pygmalion, a Cypriot sculptor in a narrative by Ovid in Greek mythology, who fell in love with a female statue he had carved out of ivory.

The Pygmalion effect is a form of self-fulfilling prophecy, and, in this respect, people with poor expectations internalize their negative label, and those with positive labels succeed accordingly. Within sociology, the effect is often cited with regards to education and social class.[/quote]

Logic does not get past their wall of ignorance, fear, and stupidity. Other methods must be used. As you can see from the case above, the methods used involved expose, and I am sure future legal action. That was how he got his guns back, and that is how he got to tell his side of the story, very different than what they would have had the common public believe.

[quote]There's nothing wrong with looking for signs that someone is about to snap, and if he's putting up multiple red flags, we'd certainly want law enforcement to investigate, possibly to chat with the person and his friends and family. And obviously if someone has made specific threats, a criminal investigation should follow. But that's a far cry from what happened to Pyles.

Pyles' problems began last June after a series of grievances with his employer, the Oregon Department of Transportation. "This was always a professional thing for me," he says. "It was never personal. We were handling the grievances through the process stipulated in the union contract." Pyles declined to discuss the nature of the complaints, citing stipulations in his contract.

On March 4, Pyles was placed on administrative leave, which required him to work from home. On March 5, 6, and 7, after getting his income tax refund, he made three purchases of five firearms. Pyles describes himself as a gun enthusiast, who had already owned several weapons. All three new purchases required an Oregon background check, which would have prohibited the transactions had Pyles ever been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor involving violence, or been committed by the state to a mental health institution. Pyles says he has no criminal record, and says he never threatened anyone in his office. (A specific threat of violence would have likely brought a criminal charge.) The Oregon State Police, the Medford Police Department, and the Oregon Department of Transportation did not respond to requests for comment.[/quote]

Having the capacity for independent critical thinking is just so important, and I really believe a lot of these people have lost that. They need, they have to have hero vs villain to justify what they are doing. You are either with them or against them, and if you are against them then you must be bad. It helps them to justify their actions. I have seen their actions, not all of it is bad, but on the other hand I could not willing join a frenzied mob incapable of independent and critical thinking.

They need to justify what they are doing, I have no desire to join the true insanity that I see before me which is how this flagging system works, and the actions of those doing the monitoring. It's like watching people in a lunatic frenzied state, and so they have to see those on this side as bad, and justify what they are doing. The scary part is how comforted they are when someone can share in their one handed sign language which tells them who is good vs bad.

Anyways in my official capacity I was able to save some time by finding out a bit more about the direction that targets do no need to go in.

What we need as a community are procedures. Simple procedures that most other targets can follow. Something easy affordable. If most of us knew at the beginning what was happening, we could seek out proper legal assistance before our resources were almost completely exhausted, and that is going to be the next leg of the journey.

Other targets out there are free free to make their own inquires, if you are less watched, less guarded you might have slightly better luck.

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Killing Us Softly

Barack Obama orders killing of US cleric Anwar al-Awlaki
Barack Obama's administration has authorised the assassination of the radical Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, a rare move against an American citizen.[/quote]

The decision to add him to the US hit list required a National Security Council review because of his citizenship.[/quote]

This story received a great deal of attention on forums and blogs, people seem to get it. The fact that you can not just label someone an enemy and then go out and have them killed, there is such a thing as due process. The constitution allows a fair trial.

In this case they get it, that there is something wrong with the killing of Americans in this manner. They realise that today it could be this guy, but tomorrow it could be them, if the government says that they are enemies, or flags them as such.

What they fail to understand is that within their cities, town, centers etc, is that people are being flagged. Innocent people are being flagged, placed on lists, and systemically destroyed. The deaths are not as immediate in many cases as they would be in the story above, but it's the same concept. Without due process, without a trial, without notification, many of us have been targeted, flagged without ever knowing why if you will, and are being slowly systemically destroyed because the government has told you that we are bad, crazy, or into drugs, or something bad for the community, when in reality many that are being targeted are being targeted for other reasons.

Many understand why the killing of any Americans is wrong, because today it's this guy, tomorrow it could be them. But when it comes to Gang Stalking, they fail to understand that it's the same thing. Today it's us, tomorrow it will be you, and once listed and flagged, no one will question it, the same way many of you are not asking questions about those that you are following around and targeting. About those being listed by the government.

[quote]Proposed updates to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) are prompting many to question whether or not the psychiatric profession itself has gone crazy. The latest additions to the alleged “mentally ill” could include hoarders, people who get angry every now and again, lazy people, and even those who get outraged over things like sex and violence on television.[/quote]

Also the ones that they are clearing out now, are the outspoken, whistle-blowers, intelligent, people who will stand up for things. Once this cleansing happenings, it will be far easier to get the others that to fall into line, and you will be the one's to help accomplish this with this network that is now so nicely in place. This network that targets have been trying to warn about, which many of you already knew about, but believe is for your own good. Believe that it's the states way of protecting you.

[quote]She describes them as "generally very highly intelligent people..." She says that the people her organization deals with "represent a wide range [of] every type of profession you can imagine."

The women who are singled out tend to be independent, intelligent, & confident professionals. "There's a heavy predominance of those types of woman in the TI community," affirmed McKinney. Men are in a smaller proportion, & tend to be non-conformists. They usually have a "sense of self-esteem and pride that seems to invite targeting." Remember, the MfS was a criminal federal police force that deliberately singled out people exactly like this on a massive scale.

Others that have been targeted include:

Those who have had a bad breakup with an ex-spouse who has influence
Criminals (This program may have begun targeting only criminals)
Those who have reported a crime where the perpetrator was a member of an organized crime ring
Landowners targeted by government or industry for land seizures
Gays, minorities
Inventors awaiting a large payoff
Mentally disabled
Those who have had arguments with neighbors who have connections
Those awaiting a large insurance claim
Convenient targets of opportunity
Those with special talents or abilities
Group members who act in unacceptable ways
Independent freethinkers who are not part of the herd
Those who are perceived as vulnerable or weak
Those opposing the New World Order

The pattern that is unfolding indicates that many targets are people who tend to be emotionally developed, self-confident, independent, free thinkers, artistic, people who don't need the approval of others, & those not prone to corruption. They're people who don't need to be part of a group to feel secure-generally people who are not part of the herd. The financial elite throughout history have consistently hated these individuals. There's one other type of person that the financial elite hate-truth tellers. They absolutely hate them. This is apparently why whistleblowers are targeted.[/quote]

By the time this system is finished it will cleanse and remove all that do not agree with it and all those who will not go along with it. That means when it's your turn there will already be a network in place, primed, willing and able to target those who the state wants to eliminate. The network is connected, as most targets have described trying to move from country to country only to have the flagging or designation follow them. The silence of this program will almost silence anyone who is a part of this program, cause you will not be able to say anything about it even if you are targeted by it.

Ofcouse you feel good and righteous about it now, it's cleaning the homeless, drug users, molesters, crazy people, people that are not good for society. You are putting them in jails, institutions, driving them from job to job, community to community, causing them death, or driving them to suicide, cause the state said it was ok to. You feel like you are doing something good, oh and you are, you are helping the NWO create it's army of foot soldiers who will tomorrow be used in the same way. Today you target individuals without question, cause the state told you to. Many of us having no idea why, many of us are innocent. Tomorrow when someone get's angry over the economy, health care, government mishandling, and those new DSM terms kick in, try speaking up, and out then. Then it will be your turn to be labelled, flagged, followed, and the network won't question it anymore than they question following us around.

You understand why listing someone without trial, or the right to defend themselves is wrong, many seem to grasp the future implications and long term consequences, but when it comes to Gang Stalking, many are failing to bridge the gap, to understand the equal significance of what this will mean to them.

[quote]The British government plans to collect lifelong records on all residents starting at the age of five, in order to screen for those who might be more likely to commit crimes in the future.

In a plan being piloted by Lincolnshire Community Health Services, all parents of children starting school are being sent an 83-question survey that asks detailed questions about their lives and their children’s behavior.

“This is incredibly intrusive and asks questions which, quite frankly, Lincolnshire Community Health Services do not need to know and have no right knowing,” said Dylan Sharpe of the group Big Brother Watch. “Even worse, the NHS Trust has failed to make it clear that this is a voluntary questionnaire. I would advise any parent receiving this to stick it straight in the bin.”[/quote]

The future is coming, but by bit it is unfolding. They are in every aspect of people's lives, from the time your kids are born, they want to visit your home, monitor how your kids eat, play act, before they go to school, and once in school, then they want to see which ones need to be medicated, which ones might be more likely to commit crimes? Independent thought will be conditioned away, if not brutally bullied out. A generation of fully biddable, controllable citizens will be raised up.

The internet freedoms we enjoy are slowly being removed, in many cases without a gasp or a whimper.

[quote]Government drops clause on orphan works but inserts amendment criticised as over-broad which could block sites based on ‘intent’[/quote]

From Australia to the U.K., and many other parts of Europe, the government wants to tell you which sites are ok for you to visit and see and which sites are not. They have not yet been able to destroy net neutrality, so they are going at it in this angle, and the conditioned people sit back and slowly take it.

People are waking up, that's great, but if you wake up, see what is happening in from of you and do nothing about it, well you might just as well have stayed asleep.

I don't like violence like many people, I have been trying to think of what can be done, to fight this, but in the watered-down civil ways that we have all now been conditioned to think. In times past, people turned to civil disobedience. They just refused to ride at the back of the bus, or whatever public action they did not agree with. Greece recently had strikes, which shut the city down. There is a small window before all escape routes are closed off, I think people have to start to use it.

[quote]Internet provider defies digital bill

TalkTalk’s refusal to cooperate with ‘draconian’ anti-piracy measures reflect growing resistance to the digital economy bill[/quote]

I think this is the perfect example of what people, companies, communities can do, should do, and must do to reclaim what is theirs.

Also with the scanners at the airports, many people disagree with it, but are still going along with it, then it will be at libraries, stadiums, etc. Stop it at the airports, file lawsuits, protests, or just don't go through, but these are the only ways that things will change. The other option ofcourse it to be overwhelmed, retreat into ones self and do nothing.

We each have to try to take individual action to do what we can. I am doing what I can to help targets like myself that are on these charming lists, where we are being systemically destroyed, ironically enough by our fellow citizens, in the communities that we might actually be able to do some good in.

The system works because we let it work, if it actually stops working for us, when we are out of accord with it, and what it does, then and only then will change happen. Till the it will continue to squeeze us and squeeze us, killing us softly, but dealing us a deadly blow, no less fatal than the order to kill Anwar al-Awlaki.

Labels: , , , , , , ,