Gang Stalking

A upto date blog about my adventures with gangstalking. This is my way of sharing with the world what gang stalking is really like. Some helpful books. Gang Stalking Books Mobbing Books

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

How did I become a target?

How did I become a Target?

Scenario 1 Work.

Jane has been employed at Mcat Technotronics for several years, recently her and some co-workers have not been getting along. They have started rumors, moved her stuff around, and been hostile. Jane has complained to HR and finally an investigation was opened. All the co-workers denied any harassment was ongoing. HR to keep the situation quite has placed the blame on Jane. She has been referred to the company psychiatrist. She has refused to go. The HR staff is now getting reports from those that Jane complained about, saying that they fear for their safety, and that she is a problem. HR worried about getting sued if Jane does act out violently has referred her to the companies, Threat Assessment Team.

The team reviews Jane’s file, past employers, social networking sites, family, friends. Jane lives alone, has few associations. The team has decided that Jane requires further monitoring. She is assigned a threat level, and monitored at work. A company psychiatrist has evaluated her remotely and diagnosed her as possibly suffering from a persecutory disorder, and suffering from a false belief that she is being persecuted.

Jane later acts out, get’s into a verbal confrontation with one of her harassers, and is put on probation. Jane decides to leave the job. The employer decides that Jane was very disgruntled, and alerts the Threat Assessment Team. The team decides that Jane requires further monitoring. If she acts out violently in anyway, and they did not alert those around her, they can be sued. Remote monitoring is soon to be set up around Jane. She is also given an elevated threat level.

Scenario 2. School

Raul has started college. He is getting comments and taunts, they don’t like his accent, he is a stranger to many people around him. Raul makes it clear that he does not appreciate the taunts, but this spurs on his harassers more. Eventually Raul and one young man get into a psychical altercation. All the harassers come to the defense of the harasser, placing all the blame on Raul. The student affairs department is notified. After this Raul notices increased harassment, and starts to complain. Complaint after complaint is ignored. Complaints to staff or about staff who are also taking part is ignored, and his mobbing continues. Eventually the Student Affairs department have his file sent to their threat assessment team, after some of the students express concern about his being around them, and that they feel uncomfortable or threatened. Raul is unaware of this, and just trying to get his mobbing stopped.

The Threat Assessment Team review his file, determine that he owns guns, and could be a real threat to the campus. They determine he might be suffering from schizo-affective disorder.The campus and those around Raul are put on alert, they are asked to not say anything, and to report any actions that might be deemed suspicious or problematic. Eventually Raul decides to leave the program due to the overwhelming harassment and lack of support, but since there is no way to tell if this now disgruntled young man will return, he is assigned to remote case file monitoring.

This means that those around him will be alerted, and asked to be the eyes and ears, and report any little incidents, or odd behavior. All the information will be logged and stored in a central database for processing, and review, by the team. Those around Raul are contacted made aware of the situation, and comply with the request for none disclosure as they are legally bound to do.

Scenario 3. Community

Emily Claft see’s a child ruining a flower bed, she confronts the parents, the father tells her off. She goes to her local council to complain, and the customer service rep over the phone is no help. Emily slams down the phone in disgust. She writes a letter saying that the woman was very unpleasant to deal with, she says she wishes the woman would drop dead, and feels that if they had been in person, she would have hit her.

The council review the letter, determine that Emily could be violent, and she is assigned a medium risk classification, only to be seen in two. Emily has noticed that she is seeing strangers around her where they should not be, such as the clinic, and other previously private places. The strangers are alerted every time her name comes up, that she is dangerous and should only be seen in pairs. They are asked to report any future incidents. Her information is disseminated to a wide variety of agencies.

She is placed on a community notification list. The list is also used to alert the community of pedophiles and other violent criminals.
Emily finds it impossible to function, and decides to move.

Later I will review how the local monitoring team functions. How individuals are moved in around the target as part of the monitoring process. Also understanding the role that Community Oriented Policing likely plays, and how community notification lists function.

The information is all there, and the reality is it’s all backed up. The above information can be found by reviewing the Threat Assessment Teams guidelines, and a real life case scenario.

Please keep in mind there are likely dozens upon dozens of ways that an individual could become a target, the above are just a few scenarios.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/threat-assessment-teams-gang-stalking/

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/03/jane-clift-case-highlights/

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/06/the-psychatric-reprisal/

http://www.Harassement101.com/Article5.html

Labels: , , , ,

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Such 'threat assessments' are bogus. I mean be real. Maybe in some countries that is the excuse, but, again, that is an excuse, not liking your accent, is a reason for gang stalking, Canada is a country of immigrants like the USA, no I don't buy it. Investigations should not be 'opened' for conflicts. If that was the case, well, there would be no murderers or victims. I don't buy it. I see people in conflict every day and no gang stalking is happening to them. That is a myth, a story being told, a lie going around. My coworkers would be 'investigated' and not me if that were the case. Far less intelligent and far more criminal. Hanna Arendt in Origins of Totalitarianism says: [in concentration camps] "the amalgamation of criminals with all other categories has moreover the advantage of making it shockingly evident to all other arrivals that they have landed on the lowest level of society (146)." The criminals were given perks or "constituted the aristocracy" of all others confined in concentration camps...such as the crimeless criminal. Why criminals have rights that ordinary citizens don't have who are victims of organized mobbing? They know you will see, know and question why. To make you feel like you are the lowest thing in humanity for some unknown reason that doesn't constitute the law. That you are homeless and superfluous to the earth. That there is no place where you should be except 6 feet under. A less than foreigner in your own country, less than a human being, again, superfluous to the earth itself. Is there any group of people classified in such a way by those who have power and are true criminals?

Friday, October 29, 2010  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The last comment is 2010. "Threat assessments can be used to enslave innocent persons for use as experimental torture research subjects, for "social control," MKULTRA. The cruelty of such programs is impossible to convey. However, I have hope that each and every proxy who has ever had any role in this atrocity torture, will be able to discover how evil it is.

All that is needed is for Almighty God to bring upon each proxy atrocity punishment of every creative method, going to the end of eternity. God can put each proxy to death as many times as he wishes, every second of every day and every night. It will bring awareness and retribution to each of the monsters who have been involved in the slow destruction of a worthy human being, out of greed, envy and arrogance.

Friday, January 22, 2016  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If I had understood that these "community files" existed and that these proxies were staking me because I had been VICIOUSLY DEFAMED AND CALLED ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING THAT WOULD TURN ME INTO A SOCIAL PARIAH AND KEEP ME LOCKED FOR MY ENTIRE LIFE IN A SOLITARY CONFINEMENT PRISON CELL EVERYWHERE THAT I WENT IN PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES…

I WOULD NEVER HAVE GONE TO WORSHIP. I WOULD NEVER HAVE PARTAKEN OF SERVICES IN A CHURCH. I WOULD NEVER HAVE PARTAKEN OF SERVICES IN A SYNAGOGUE. I WOULD NEVER HAVE ATTEMPTED TO ASSOCIATE WITH ANY HUMAN BEING.

I SHOULD HAVE REALIZED THAT IT WAS OCCURRING, SINCE IT WAS SO OBVIOUS. I WOULD ACT FRIENDLY, POSITIVE AND REASONABLE AND BE TREATED LIKE A PARIAH.

I THINK THAT IT SHOULD BE DONE IN A LESS HYPOCRITICAL AND DECEITFUL MANNER. EVERY MEMBER OF THE SO-CALLLED "COMMUNITY" SHOULD HAVE A LARGE SIGN FOR THE VICTIM OF THIS FORM OF ATROCITY ABUSE. EACH MEMBER SHOULD HOLD UP THIS HUGE SIGN NEVER HIGH IN THE AIR AND MAKE SURE THAT IT IS VISIBLE TO ALL.

THEY SHOULD HOLD UP A SIGN THAT ACCUSES A TOTALLY INNOCENT PERSON. THEY ARE REALLY LIMITED ONLY BY THEIR IMAGINATION AND THE MORE EXTREME AND VIOLENT THE ACCUSATION, THE BETTER:

PEDOPHILE, MURDERER, RAPIST, THEIF, VANDAL, VIOLENT ASSAILANT, VANDAL, DRUG ADDICT, WORTHLESS PERSON…

DIFFERENT MEMBERS OF THE SO-CALLED "COMMUNITY" CAN HOLD UP A DIFFERENT SIGN. THIS WILL GET THE MESSAGE ACROSS. MORTIFYING AS IT IS TO THE INNOCENT VICTIM, IT IS AMUSING AND PROFITABLE TO THE UNSCRUPULOUS.

I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE TERM "COMMUNITY" CAN BE USED TO REFER TO A GROUP THAT WOULD TAKE SUCH ACTION AGAINST AN INNOCENT HUMAN BEING. IT IS FAR TOO BARBARIC. THEY ARE AUTOMATICALLY NOT A COMMUNITY.

Friday, January 22, 2016  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

EVERYWHERE THE VICTIM GOES, THE COMMUNITY OF WOLVES SHOULD HOLD UP A LARGE SIGN VERY HIGH IN THE AIR, SO THAT IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE VICTIM IS BEING PERSECUTED. THE SIGNS CAN BE AS VICIOUS AS THE COMMUNITY OF WOLVES WOULD LIKE. IT IS TRULY DIFFICULT FOR ME TO IMAGINE A MORE BARBARIC PRACTICE THAN THIS SECRETIVE DEFAMATION WITH STATE RADICAL FUNDING AND STAFFING.

RED CHINA DOES NOT LIKE THE PRACTICE OF A TYPE OF YOGA. PERSONS WHO PRACTICE THIS YOGA ARE BREAKING THE LAW AND ARE AWARE THAT THEIR ACTIONS ARE ILLEGAL. IT IS TRUE THAT CHINA WILL BARBARICALLY LOCK UP SUCH PERSONS AND BURN OFF THEIR FACES LITERALLY, WITH DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS. HOWEVER, THIS COMMUNITY FILE AND NOTIFICATIONS IN SECRECY CONCEPT IS EVERY BIT AS CRUEL AND HORRIFIC.

AT LEAST, IF I LIVED IN CHINA, I COULD CHOSE TO OBEY THE LAW AND NOT PRACTICE FALUN GONG. BUT, HOW CAN I PROTECT MYSELF FROM MALICIOUS SLANDER TOLD IN PERFECT SECRECY?

IS THERE A MORE CRUEL TORTURE THAN SOLITARY CONFINEMENT OF AN INNOCENT VICTIM FOR A LIFETIME? IF YOU DO IT TO A DOG, YOU WILL BE CHARGED WITH A CRIME AND HATED.

Friday, January 22, 2016  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Also, it is a lot of fun for proxies, who have directed energy weapons to MOLEST a victim through the walls in private body parts. This should get them put onto a sex offender list and required to abide by rules for dangerous sex offenders for the rest of their lives. However, they are permitted to do any perverted and vicious torture which they please.

Friday, January 22, 2016  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Or, they can suddenly burn the mouth of a victim, until the lips bleed. All of this is fun and entertainment to sadistic criminals.
If a person is working for law enforcement and commits crimes against victims, that person is not a law enforcement professional, but a violent criminal pretending to be law enforcement.

Friday, January 22, 2016  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home