Handmaidens of the New World Order
I set out trying to find out what was happening to the Gang Stalking Community.
Why were we being followed around? How could they track targets from country to country? Why were Cointelpro and Stasi like tactics being used on average citizens to systemically destroy their lives?
I thought I was going to find something easy to fix, but what I found is far more widespread.
Under the same pattern that has repeated itself throughout history, I found that the state has found a way to once again convince the good people of the society that they are doing God's work, or being good citizens, by systemically destroying the undesirables in society.
You are cleansing your societies of homeless, mentally ill, perverts, drug users, dealers, whoever is on a list and whoever you are told to destroy. You once again felt empowered, in control in charge. The power that had been taken away from you was back in your hands once again. You were doing the right thing, it was a not in my back yard mentality to rid your communities and societies of the filth and the evils infecting it, but somewhere along the lines, you have unwittingly become the monsters in the closet, that you sought to remove from amongst you. You have unwittingly become the handmaidens of the New World Order.
Almost every shift in history that has happened, first had an informant force. Under the guise of this program, we now have such an extensive force of informants, but if the reports from targets are true, we are well on our way to having an international informant force. Citizens who use a one handed sign language the same way the Stasi did, and pretty much for the same purpose.
For along with the undesirable, you are helping to remove those undesirables the state does not want in our societies. You are helping to remove the outspoken, the whistle-blowers, the aggressive, those who don't fit into this system, your future leaders, the free thinkers, those who question. You are removing those 1 in 20 who would sound the alarm, write those controversial stories, be outspoken and tell the state where to go, and where to stick it. Those types are easy to spot in the workplace, schools and community, and those types ask the questions that should have been asked a long time ago, but are not. Those types challenge this system and are being removed, disenfranchised, eliminated for their efforts.
Don't get me wrong, I am sure in the beginning, pedophiles were allowed to feed on the innocent, violent offenders were allowed to commit acts of violence, and much like in V 4 Vendetta, this created a problem. It created fear, but not to worry, your government had the perfect solutions for you. They would give you lists of people, those undesirable amongst you that you should protect your society from and unquestioningly, you would go after them, like a vengeful plague, and remove them from amongst you. Convinced of the righteousness of what the state told you to do, you proceeded in that vain, without question and with impunity.
I don't doubt that there are bad people in society, people who do really evil things, that we would like to have advanced warnings for, but just like programs of the past, this is also being used heavily to get rid of people you are going to need, or would have needed for a revolution/rebellion. People on forums keep asking where are our leaders? We have this intrinsic sense that there amongst us should be those that are smarter, capable of organizing, telling the rest of us what to do, how to get out of this mess? I am sure there are and you know where to find them? Look for them in the mental wards, jails, the homeless, disenfranchised, and in the morgues. That is where your leaders and future leaders are ending up.
At first it seemed weird that programs like bullying, mobbing, and Gang Stalking targeted specific kinds of people, but that now makes perfectly good sense.
The order that is coming into play, will systemically remove this sort from every community, and what will be left, will be a highly biddable population. These leader types are easy to spot and target, they are outspoken, they in a natural setting would rise to the top, but often they are mobbed out of work, set upon, and under systems such as Gang Stalking, become poor, disenfranchised, end up in jail, mental wards, committing suicide, mass murder, or being pinpointed as undesirables to be removed.
We saw this with the Civil Rights Movement, the systemic destruction of the Panthers and others who would go against this system. Ruby Ridge, Waco. I kept asking throughout the research, why have no significant movement or leaders arisen since that time? What's happened to them? Well if anyone remembers many from that time were systemically eliminated, some are still in jail, on death row, fugitives from their own countries. The history of groups such as the panthers is very illuminating. How the state deals with dissidence, and how it's continued to since that time, to ensure that now become too influential, how it fosters, and nurtures false leaders who are then consistently presented to the people. False movements. When I did the research, I found many of the similar things happening amongst the various groups, be it extremists, conspiracy theorists, AIDS dissidents, etc. Disinfo, people hired by the state, agents, those with an agenda, legit people being discredited, demonized, murder, assassinations, suspected assassinations.
The influential in our society that rise seem to never last for long. Not to get into conspiracies, but Princess Diana was just coming into her own when she meet that terrible car accidents, her campaign for landmines and anything else she did in the future would have had a pretty big impact on society, most likely in a positive way. What's interesting about Diana is that her image in the U.K. press had become somewhat bad before her death, and it had been rumoured she might even be planning to leave the U.K. She was often hounded by the media, at times in disrespectful ways that did not suit someone of her stature, and then the car accident happened, which she predicted ahead of time, and that was that.
Micheal Jackson King of Pop was coming back in his own, and he was a very influential person, who had a large and diverse following, he felt that there was a conspiracy against him, and from what I have researched, I agree. Anyways he passed away at a time when he might have been able to influence a large population of people, who needed guidance.
Accidents, mishaps, mysterious deaths, whistle-blowers, scientists, the inquisitive, outspoken, it goes hand in hand, and most don't notice that these sorts are being removed and cleaned from our society.
The handmaidens of the New World Order with their good intentions, who have been lied to in some cases are at it again. In order to save themselves from the evil terrorists, that hate their freedoms, many have given up their freedoms. Soon your minds will be read at airports, and maybe other places, naked scanners are now going to be mandatory. People are being arrested for mind crimes, crimes that they might do. Forced mental exams. Little by little this planned system is revealing itself, and those who would stand in it's way, are being eliminated by hook or by crook.
That's how a take over can be happen. It can be done in the open with blood shed, it can be done with force, this attempt has been made in America before, but failed, or it can be done from the inside out, slowly and insidiously without ever firing a single bullet.
Lot's of death, but very little blood shed. The enemies are quietly being removed from every community, a nice little house cleaning is happening. The outspoken are being silenced, the real truthers being removed. Anyone with influence who is not onboard will be removed before their influence can become too great, and people are consistently feed a stream of false leaders, and prophets, but somewhere inside we remember what real leaders should be like, and we long for them.
The problem remains those in charge understand something essential, they understand human nature, human history, and they understand how to manipulate it, influence it, control it, keep it bottled up. They know how to work it towards their will, and they are succeeding. We have had some good and vital awakenings with the Internet, but as those internet freedoms are slowly being bottled up again, we sit passively watching once more. The awake seemingly not enough to make a difference which is not true, cause all it takes is one to make a difference, but that one never quite seems to make it to the top, the true leaders never seem to quite rise to where they need to be.
When I was doing research into the extremist community, I looked at how Grant Bristow and Wolfgang Droege formed a party in Canada. It was one of the biggest of it's kind, and did very well, very influential. Only one problem Mr Bristow was a paid agent from the start, working for a Canadian Intelligence agency. Yet under the combined leadership, the group they formed was one of the most influential. After Bristows cover was blown, and Drogue did somemore time in jail, he was not able to come out and be effective. In fact he found himself jobless, and according to many online sources it's been implied that he eventually ended up working for the police as an informant. He also sold drugs from his home. Oddly enough Mr Droege was shot by a Targeted Individual, who felt that Mr Droege was responsible for his surveillance and gaslighting that he was experiencing. Strange world. The point is however, though I don't agree with Droege's views, when I did research him, I believe he was sincere in his views and genuinely wanted to do what he felt was right for his community, so why did he not rise to the top on his own? Why was he not supported after leaving jail? Why was he left so disenfranchised that his fate was to join forces with the police, selling drugs to survive?
Most will see the above example and say, oh but he was an extremist who cares, but it's not just happening to this group, and we should all care, because it's happening to all groups in society. The real groups, leaders often struggle for bread and butter, while people like the Hal Turners of this world get people to send in donations. He was making 100,000 as an informant, yet he still had those donations coming in, how many real leaders lost their homes, while people followed the FBI's solution to fake leadership? This happens in many communities.
The plants tend to get the media attention, the money, and the followers, which I think could be in part because the informants are told which groups to support. I have watched this time and again in the Gang Stalking community so I know the pattern all too well. People follow the wrong group, wrong leaders and waste their time, money, and efforts going after the wrong things. This is done deliberately. This happens across the board. Controlled opposition, controlled rebellion, while real rebellion get's dealt with.
As long as they understand human nature it seems that they will control us to their ends. A shift is happening, it feels like the same influences who were behind much of what happened in Nazi Germany are back at their own games, and history feels like it's about to have a repeat. It's hard to imagine, because for many things seem so normal, they don't see the similarities. Others see it all too well and have been trying to warn others to no avail.
History has never had a good record of not protecting it's Messiahs. Jesus, Joan of Ark, to help humanity is to be turned upon in many cases, this pattern seems to be fairly consistent as well. Can this change? Sure, people have to start with the young. The undue influence with their lives, and minds begins early. Parents should limit what they watch on television. Teach at home if you can, but most people's lifestyles just do not allow for this. Our children are often handed off to strangers, or the agents of the state to be trained up and educated the way they see fit, and the ones that are not, will be medicated to fit that bill, or bullied to become socially engineered compliant non thinkers.
This generation will believe what they are taught, if that is loyalty to the state, then loyalty to the state it will be. It they are taught that being informants is the right thing to do, they will not question it. If they grow up in a society where mind reading technology is used in every day life, and naked scanners, they won't think that it's unnatural. It's the same way this generation uses cellphones, they won't question these technologies, or being even RFID chips, or ink on their bodies. They just will not know a time before them. If you can get to your children first, then you stand a chance. However the few who can raise up healthy free thinkers then run the risk of having their children grow up to be future targets of the state. For free thinking, and the outspoken, those who do not follow the orthodoxy, have been prime targets throughout history.
As it is now, it seems a similar clearing is happening, and the handmaidens of the NWO are being used, wittingly or unwittingly to bring about those ends. Right before your eye a system is being unveiled, and an agenda is happening, some see it, many don't, but it's there, and as it becomes more visible, people will be amazed, but this is a system that was predicted a long time ago. It is one that has been coming into affect for some time now. I think that change is possible at any stage, I think that a difference can be made, that is why this system is so careful about what influences are allowed to rise. I think if the people ever stopped following false prophets, took ownership, and stopped looking outside of themselves for answers that change could happen. First however it's helpful to realise that there is an agenda at foot, then once you understand the size and scope, and don't allow yourself to be paralyzed with fear, then real change can happen.