Brighting and other observations.
Brighting.
Remember how we were told that this was used for gaslighting targets at night? Well I think this might not be the case. I recently had an opportunity to be exposed to this phenomenon and I have a few observations.
I don't get exposed to this phenomenon too much so, it's been very difficult observe it properly and to do a proper assessment. Well recently they were circling me, I use this term, because they remind me of sharks, but they don't really circle, so much as drive up the street and flash the high beams at you a few times.
Now in the past when I have been exposed to this, it's been one car, I usually sneer at them and go on my way, but recently I had a few cars in a row do it, and I realised, I don't think it's gaslighting or it's not just gaslighting alone.
After a few of this, I realised that they were waiting for something so I flashed them the open communications and on observation signals. (Yeah I emotionally showered after.) I don't do use the signals too often, in early research when I was learning what they were, I used them to confirm that I was correct, and then most times they are put away, till I have to be around the informants for long periods of time, or if I have to do field testing to confirm things or test things out.
Anyways, after this, the circling stopped. So think about it. During the day, the foot patrols signal to the people in the cars, right, well at night it's dark, so you are a snitch in your car, you see someone walking, you want to know if it's one of yours, so you flash the beams at them, and if they are, they should signal back the appropriate signals right?
Think about those old spy movies, and they flash the highbeams, and then the person responses by lighting a cigarette or something.
Now I have not had any real time to field test this, and they don't use brighting on me enough, so it could be awhile before I get to confirm this, but if any other targets are out there and they get this, then you might want to field test it. It might help give you a one up.
So that would make brighting a little bit more important than once thought. It's been close to three years and it never really occurred to me, that's why we need to keep thinking outside of the box, and again I have not had time to properly field test this, but I have reason to believe the hypothesis is correct.
The other concept that I want to touch on is one that I came across in Control Factor, Matrix, and I think the movie They Live.
It's this concept that anyone can be an agent, just about anyone can be used. I came across it again in control factor, but it just also reminded me of the other two movies.
In control factor, what they can do is they can use a beam to almost like possess someone else and speak and act through that person, you see the same thing in the Matrix with them possessing people and taking them over, and in they live you never knew who might be one of them without your real world glasses on. It's just an interesting concept and it's also interesting because you see this theme in so many movies, and then we have a society where large portions are informants. Plus there is concept that some are in constant contact, with others who they are getting orders from and instructions. It's interesting the movies that are out there.
Set Up's.
Online recently other than falsely labeling my site, there seems to be an effort by some to paint me as a person who is bashing others and creating infighting. If bashing others means calling it like it is, and telling the truth about what is ongoing, then so be it, but the same standards they use for others, they better use for themselves. Second with infighting. Guess what, the reason I believe in a leaderless resistance is because for the most part it avoids that. The way this system works is that each sector does their own thing, it's just like how each fusion center does it's own thing, well if we want to be effective, each mini resistance to a degree has to do it's own thing, no two can be or should be exactly alike, and that makes it harder to eliminate everyone. The same tactics they use, we should use similar. I remember in the movie V and V the final battle each city had it's own chapter of the resistance.
Therefore since I tend to stay separate for the most part, unless someone does something deliberate like attacking my website, with some phony witch hunt, then I don't have a problem with anyone, but if you expect to attack me or mine without getting it back, or getting called on it, it's not going to happen.
Offline.
They seem to be really trying to squeeze my resources. Not just me, but those around me and anyone that might be of aid or assistance to me. I remember when Mark M. Rich on his old site talked about this. He had a couple of sisters and they all sold their homes and moved into smaller places, places that he would not be able to stay at if he should become homeless.
I remember that they made Rachel homeless, and another target was homeless when they further took his resources away, arrested him, and turned him into an informant. See that's why I try to not judge people, because I remember some of the stuff that I have read.
Also the reason some of stay alive this long, I like to think it's because we are a bit clever, but in reality it might just be because they can keep us on the borders. See people like Jeremy Blake and Theresa Duncan, they had means, and Jeremy was loyal to her. You could not get them both by making them poor, unemployed whatever, so Theresa was found dead one day, apparently a suicide, and Jeremy shortly after because he was so upset about her suicide. I have always believe these were not suicides, but proving it is another story.
For those who don't know the story here is a link.
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/category/jeremy-blake/
I should point out that Theresa on her blog if I recall correctly had her FOIA and it showed that she had been investigated. I would have to double check this, but I think that is correct.
http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1201450715
Also Ruth Goodman seems to have been someone ok, in that she owned her own home, and she had gotten past the psychological attacks when they had her arrested, implanted her in some way, and that's when the audio harassment started. She died shortly after that, supposedly under mysterious circumstances.
The closest I ever came to know more about Ruth, was finding one of her postings on a forum, but the time I went to find out more information about her, I found out that she was already dead, but her story moved me, and I have remembered it.
I think the reason they were taken out is that the state did not readily have ways to make them vulnerable, and wanted to find other ways to deal with them, and thus they did.
This is a path that no one should have to travel alone, and yet in some ways we might be safer if we do. I would remind people about some of my experiences on some of these forums, and some of the tactics that disinfo agents and informants use.
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/disinformation/
Also offline they seem to be trying for mini setup's, little things that you might not think of, but things that might get you in trouble. I have always been law abiding, and continue to be, but that does not mean they are not testing the waters to see if they can find a weak spot or a way in, trust no one, seems to be the key. It's pretty horrible, how they own people once they do set them up. I have witnessed this close up, seen people that I use to know, and they are shells, it's like they own their souls or try to, whatever they do, it's sick, and I would say it's against God, because what they do, contributes to the darkness of this world, and it's not in favor of the light what they do. All good people, must stand against this.
Rachel Hoffman is a good example of how they can make a good kid turn desperate. She was so desperate to have her own charges dropped that she was willing to first try to set up one of her friends, and then she was willing to do a drug buy, to try to get her records dropped and get the hell out of dodge, but she lost her life doing this, and the same way they can make someone like Rachel Hoffman desperate, is the same way they work on other people, little by little. There is something truly wrong with these people.
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/rachel-hoffman-disturbing-thoughts/
Anyways just to bear witness for myself again, I am anti drugs, never dabbled in anything illegal that I am aware of, don't plan to.
Again I would remind people the material is there, use it, while it's still available. Back it up, post it in various places, etc. I have seen a lot in just the last three years, and pray constantly, I think it's one of the only ways we can hold back the darkness, for any length of time.
Labels: agents, Brighting, darkness, gang stalking, Informants, Jeremy Blake, Racheal Hoffman, Ruth Goodman, set up
4 Comments:
Maybe the brighting is for other scientific purposes. Think of an observer than can observe various quantum-level properties of your body. Maybe the two contrasting light levels is doing something to excite the atoms in your nervous system, like increase the magnetic field it gives off, so the 'remote observer' can detect your 'signature' better? There is so much we don't know about their technology, because a lot of it seems to be top secret stuff only a handful of scientists know about? And maybe they weren't alive after they developed it? The people who contracted it out could've gotten rid of them somehow ala Jimmy Hoffa, so they couldn't divulge the info to the public.
All that is just speculation, though. You can bet mass mind control is right around the corner using this secret tech. only a few know about. Right now things are chaotic for targets, but I suspect that this is going to be the end result when the dust finally settles.
I am definitely law abiding, but they are always on the prowl looking for those weak spots, using whomever they can get their paws on.
Secondly, there seems to be this never-ending attempt to get me to 'flip out', go crazy, maybe take out a few people, with some of their shills and operatives harassing me and provoking me in various 'innocuous' ways. This 'hidden' ways are not obvious at all, and a lot of times the harassment is just outright practically to my face, where anyone can see what's going on. That combined with the 'hidden' ways of getting me to react violently, is probably one of their tricks to get me to go out on a violent note.
Nice people. That's why I was hoping they were more formidable than they first appear. A lot of times, they are just so lame, ridiculous and boring, but think they are having the time of their life. I just ignore them; it seems to take so much life out of them. It's like the druggies and losers in high school, so primitive, looking for anything for attention, trying to get the honor students to go insane with their gags and insults. It would be a great boost to their lame, boring, non-achieving lives.
Considering Duncan and Blake had borrowed money from her mother, a professor, to rent the place in NYC, I'd say they weren't rolling in money. She hadn't been investigated by anyone for anything. Your experience isn't the same as hers.
Jeremy had a job that was going to make them lot's of money. They had people they could get money from, they came from well to do circles and they were liked.
Most targets struggle to make ends meet. Where they lived the rent could have set some targets up for a very long time, so they did have means, be it borrowed or whatever. Plus Jeremy's new job, and the play or whatever it is they were planning on putting together would have been an additonal source of income.
I wonder if they died because of their intension to sue the church of scientology and the documents they were putting together and the names they were going to be naming. It would not be the first time.
I feel so sorry for what happened to them, because I don't know if we will ever get the truth.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home