Brighting and other observations.

Brighting.

Remember how we were told that this was used for gaslighting targets at night? Well I think this might not be the case. I recently had an opportunity to be exposed to this phenomenon and I have a few observations.

I don't get exposed to this phenomenon too much so, it's been very difficult observe it properly and to do a proper assessment. Well recently they were circling me, I use this term, because they remind me of sharks, but they don't really circle, so much as drive up the street and flash the high beams at you a few times.

Now in the past when I have been exposed to this, it's been one car, I usually sneer at them and go on my way, but recently I had a few cars in a row do it, and I realised, I don't think it's gaslighting or it's not just gaslighting alone.

After a few of this, I realised that they were waiting for something so I flashed them the open communications and on observation signals. (Yeah I emotionally showered after.) I don't do use the signals too often, in early research when I was learning what they were, I used them to confirm that I was correct, and then most times they are put away, till I have to be around the informants for long periods of time, or if I have to do field testing to confirm things or test things out.

Anyways, after this, the circling stopped. So think about it. During the day, the foot patrols signal to the people in the cars, right, well at night it's dark, so you are a snitch in your car, you see someone walking, you want to know if it's one of yours, so you flash the beams at them, and if they are, they should signal back the appropriate signals right?

Think about those old spy movies, and they flash the highbeams, and then the person responses by lighting a cigarette or something.

Now I have not had any real time to field test this, and they don't use brighting on me enough, so it could be awhile before I get to confirm this, but if any other targets are out there and they get this, then you might want to field test it. It might help give you a one up.

So that would make brighting a little bit more important than once thought. It's been close to three years and it never really occurred to me, that's why we need to keep thinking outside of the box, and again I have not had time to properly field test this, but I have reason to believe the hypothesis is correct.


The other concept that I want to touch on is one that I came across in Control Factor, Matrix, and I think the movie They Live.

It's this concept that anyone can be an agent, just about anyone can be used. I came across it again in control factor, but it just also reminded me of the other two movies.

In control factor, what they can do is they can use a beam to almost like possess someone else and speak and act through that person, you see the same thing in the Matrix with them possessing people and taking them over, and in they live you never knew who might be one of them without your real world glasses on. It's just an interesting concept and it's also interesting because you see this theme in so many movies, and then we have a society where large portions are informants. Plus there is concept that some are in constant contact, with others who they are getting orders from and instructions. It's interesting the movies that are out there.


Set Up's.

Online recently other than falsely labeling my site, there seems to be an effort by some to paint me as a person who is bashing others and creating infighting. If bashing others means calling it like it is, and telling the truth about what is ongoing, then so be it, but the same standards they use for others, they better use for themselves. Second with infighting. Guess what, the reason I believe in a leaderless resistance is because for the most part it avoids that. The way this system works is that each sector does their own thing, it's just like how each fusion center does it's own thing, well if we want to be effective, each mini resistance to a degree has to do it's own thing, no two can be or should be exactly alike, and that makes it harder to eliminate everyone. The same tactics they use, we should use similar. I remember in the movie V and V the final battle each city had it's own chapter of the resistance.

Therefore since I tend to stay separate for the most part, unless someone does something deliberate like attacking my website, with some phony witch hunt, then I don't have a problem with anyone, but if you expect to attack me or mine without getting it back, or getting called on it, it's not going to happen.


Offline.

They seem to be really trying to squeeze my resources. Not just me, but those around me and anyone that might be of aid or assistance to me. I remember when Mark M. Rich on his old site talked about this. He had a couple of sisters and they all sold their homes and moved into smaller places, places that he would not be able to stay at if he should become homeless.


I remember that they made Rachel homeless, and another target was homeless when they further took his resources away, arrested him, and turned him into an informant. See that's why I try to not judge people, because I remember some of the stuff that I have read.

Also the reason some of stay alive this long, I like to think it's because we are a bit clever, but in reality it might just be because they can keep us on the borders. See people like Jeremy Blake and Theresa Duncan, they had means, and Jeremy was loyal to her. You could not get them both by making them poor, unemployed whatever, so Theresa was found dead one day, apparently a suicide, and Jeremy shortly after because he was so upset about her suicide. I have always believe these were not suicides, but proving it is another story.

For those who don't know the story here is a link.
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/category/jeremy-blake/

I should point out that Theresa on her blog if I recall correctly had her FOIA and it showed that she had been investigated. I would have to double check this, but I think that is correct.




http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1201450715

Also Ruth Goodman seems to have been someone ok, in that she owned her own home, and she had gotten past the psychological attacks when they had her arrested, implanted her in some way, and that's when the audio harassment started. She died shortly after that, supposedly under mysterious circumstances.

The closest I ever came to know more about Ruth, was finding one of her postings on a forum, but the time I went to find out more information about her, I found out that she was already dead, but her story moved me, and I have remembered it.

I think the reason they were taken out is that the state did not readily have ways to make them vulnerable, and wanted to find other ways to deal with them, and thus they did.



This is a path that no one should have to travel alone, and yet in some ways we might be safer if we do. I would remind people about some of my experiences on some of these forums, and some of the tactics that disinfo agents and informants use.

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/disinformation/


Also offline they seem to be trying for mini setup's, little things that you might not think of, but things that might get you in trouble. I have always been law abiding, and continue to be, but that does not mean they are not testing the waters to see if they can find a weak spot or a way in, trust no one, seems to be the key. It's pretty horrible, how they own people once they do set them up. I have witnessed this close up, seen people that I use to know, and they are shells, it's like they own their souls or try to, whatever they do, it's sick, and I would say it's against God, because what they do, contributes to the darkness of this world, and it's not in favor of the light what they do. All good people, must stand against this.


Rachel Hoffman is a good example of how they can make a good kid turn desperate. She was so desperate to have her own charges dropped that she was willing to first try to set up one of her friends, and then she was willing to do a drug buy, to try to get her records dropped and get the hell out of dodge, but she lost her life doing this, and the same way they can make someone like Rachel Hoffman desperate, is the same way they work on other people, little by little. There is something truly wrong with these people.

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/rachel-hoffman-disturbing-thoughts/



Anyways just to bear witness for myself again, I am anti drugs, never dabbled in anything illegal that I am aware of, don't plan to.

Again I would remind people the material is there, use it, while it's still available. Back it up, post it in various places, etc. I have seen a lot in just the last three years, and pray constantly, I think it's one of the only ways we can hold back the darkness, for any length of time.

The reactions are in.

As many know, I have been tracking the New York Times article to see what kind of reaction it's getting across the board.

It's gotten a lot of various reactions. I have come across people who now say that it's trendy to think that you are being followed around. Gang Stalking trendy? I don't know about that one.
We have people who think that we are paranoids getting together and sharing stories, but getting the help we need and that's a good thing. I didn't stop to find out if the person was Martha Steward or not, but apparently it's a good thing. LOL.

I came across one person who is researching the Jeremy Blake and Teresa Duncan suicides, or what they termed Gang Stalking by Scientology, and this person was a little bit concerned for their own well being after starting this research. I mean a general research is one thing, but any time you did deep like Gary Webb did, you do have to be careful.

I have had to join Digg, Reddit, Slashdot, and so many other places to track this article down, and the reaction to it. Cause it's nice to know the pulse of the Internet.

So Gang Stalking has become a household name. Which is good. It's not in the way we wanted it, in many cases, but the term is out there and that was a goal. Everyone has to start someplace. I see this like starting in the mail room. We have our foot in the door, it's our choice what we make of it.

We still have a lot of people who read the article, did not go and visit any of the websites mentioned, and formulated an opinion strictly based on the article. I found at least one person who tried to check out the website, but who said it was down. I know my website shows 100% up time over the last few weeks, so I suggested he try again.

My email is not working properly so if you do email me, and don't get me, please use the Wordpress blog to try for access. It's just within the last 72 hours that it's not working correctly. Email is either not arriving, or it's being delayed for several hours.

Also in tracking the article, I found a copy of it at this forum. I wanted to be able to respond to the article, because as you know, I have written a response.

http://forum.psychlinks.ca/showthread.php?p=103474

I used the user name gangstalking, because it's what I use all over the Internet, when speaking out about what is happening. Have a cause, use the name that goes with the cause, just common sense. Well after waiting to be approved. (We are not worthy, we are not worthy. Sorry flash back to Wayne's World the movie.)

Anyways, I received this response.

[quote]"Given the sensitive nature of the Psychlinks Forum, your chosen username, "gangstalking", is likely to be a trigger for certain members.
I have deleted this account. Feel free to re-register with a less triggering username.
Dr. David J. Baxter, C.Psych."[/quote]

So I wrote to him to find out what kind of trigger this was likely to be? It has not been a trigger for anyone over the last two years, but suddenly, it's going to be a trigger, because you are going to make it so perhaps?

So I wrote back to find out what kind of a trigger this was going to be? It seem a little neurotic to me. See my feedback below.

[quote]"I registered the user name gangstalking, because you had an article on this forum that I wanted to comment on.

I was told that I could not use the user name gangstalking, because it might be a trigger word. I am wondering what type of pre-conseived notions this forum has regarding the user name gangstalking.

http://forum.psychlinks.ca/index.php show details 8:39 AM (12 hours ago)"[/quote]

Apparently it takes a long time to be approved for this forum. 12 hours ago. I really do think people create neurosis themselves, at times. Anyways he writes back.

[quote]We have members who have experienced a variety of trauma, including sexual assaults and ex-partner stalking and violence. You need to understand and be sensitive to these issues if you are going to be a member of this community.That is a very strict forum policy. On your second registration, I changed your username to GS when I approved it. Dr. David J. Baxter, C.Psych.
[/quote]

Ok I can understand his surface concern, but remember associating with people who have been through these types of situations is not new for me or different. In the last two years, I have encountered and associated with a variety of people. So I wrote back.

[quote]So Dr Baxter, to understand you correctly. Even though I have used the user name on the Sexual Harassment Support forum, the Stalking Victims Sanctuary forum, and several other related forums of that type, you now feel that it would be insensitive to use this user name on your forum.

I am well aware of the sensitivity of these issues, having championed and dealth with these issues on a peer to peer support basis. I have conversed with several of these other support sites, and they did not come to the same conclusions that you have, thus I am trying to understand what is behind this concern with the user name.

I respect your forum guidelines, I however am still not clear why you personally feel that the user name will have a negative effect on your members, when it has not on other forums thus mentioned. I am just trying to understand what is at the heart of this matter. Regards, gangstalking.[/quote]

At this stage I am going to trust that Dr Baxter understands his community better than I do, and they may be more sensitive than other communities of a similar nature, and so I am going to decline to be a part of his community, because if my user name would offend, then what might my commenting do? Since the term Gang Stalking is likely to come up? Also if the term is so offensive that I can't use the user name, then why have an article with this on your forum?

http://forum.psychlinks.ca/showthread.php?p=103474

I don't want to be mean, but I am thinking that there are people coming across this article on that forum, seeing the name and wigging out. Either way, so that I don't risk offending, I am going to refrain from posting on this forum and responding to the article.

I really wanted to respond to the article, as I have on several other Internet websites, to help facilitate a better understanding of our community and what we are about and why we felt some portions of the New York Times article were unbalanced, but I feel at this stage, anything I write there, might be construed as harmful to the members. So out of respect for that, I will refrain from posting my article response, which many of you have now seen.

http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Social/article.php?sid=315&mode=thread&order=0

For better or for worst the term Gang Stalking is now a household name, offline and online. The question now is how do we as a community help facilitate further understanding and awareness to the general public, who still get their information from the mainstream media, in many cases without any relevant questions being asked?

Conspiracy of two.

http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/01/suicides200801?currentPage=1

The above article is an update on Jeremy Blake and Theresa Duncan. The alleged double suicide?

For those who don't know the story, they were saying they were being harassed, spied on, monitored, etc by scientologist and maybe the government. If you read the article above in full, you will see a lot of similarities to some of the things that Gang stalking targets talk about. They even ended up moving from L.A. to New York.

A few days before her death she and Jeremy had made some really successfull inroads in getting a film she wanted produced. They had written a 27 page documentation about their harassment and were thinking of suing the church of Scientology. This never happened of course.

The article give a lot of information, and is worth reading before it disappears or is archived elsewhere. I really believe this is a case of what we have all been waiting for. The deaths have made it around in a lot of circles and the mystery or possible mystery has not died down yet.

The only thing is, my blog and a couple of others related to Gang Stalking are the only ones at the time that I could find who covered the story, even though I did take the time to drop off the article on a certain forum.

Below are some quotes from the article. Alone they never mean much, but in conjunction it
makes me think this story is worth looking into. Remember it's the same system in the end, and if these two were Gang Stalking targets, then we should acknowledge that and give credence to their memories.

http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/01/suicides200801?currentPage=1

[quote]There had been reports they had become “paranoid,” obsessed with conspiracy theories, believing they were being harassed by Scientologists. The Internet filled up with conjecture about government plots and murder. Something about their story seemed to capture the modern imagination, if only because no one knew exactly why two such accomplished and attractive people had chosen to make their exit.[/quote]

Yes I wonder why that is? Anything is possible but based on what I have read, I would guess there was more to the story.

[quote]Blake wrote of how he and Duncan had been “harassed here to the point of absurdity” by people who were so “paranoid” that it made him “laugh.” He said that they had been “defamed by crazy Scientologists,” threatened and followed by “their thugs.” [/quote]

See at least she had a witness and they did not go through it by themselves, but even with a bit of celebrity, they still did not fair any better.

[quote]Meanwhile, Hollywood, Blake said, was “under a pathetic right-wing invasion” by the Bush administration and “extremist religious groups.” He mentioned a couple of media companies with obvious Republican leanings. And then he said, “They are even running ads on the Cartoon Network recruiting people to be in the CIA!”

He spoke of how he was beginning to realize that his work had the “power to influence” a global audience without the need for “corporate backing.” “I am starting to see this as a very powerful thing,” he said. “Almost miraculous. Best, J.B.”[/quote]

The Internet as we know it now has the same influential power, but for how much longer?
[quote]Beck’s involvement in Scientology was unconfirmed to the public until 2005, when he acknowledged his affiliation in an interview with The New York Times, lauding the sect for its work with illiterate kids and drug addicts. His father, musician David Campbell, who lives in Los Angeles, is also a Scientologist, as is his wife, Marissa.

According to Duncan, sometime in their two-year acquaintance, Beck expressed to her and Blake a desire to leave the church, and they had offered him encouragement and even assistance. “That’s ridiculous. Totally false,” Beck said. “Had we been closer and discussed anything as personal as religion, I would have only had positive things to say about Scientology.”

Duncan e-mailed a friend in late 2006: “[Beck] really, really tried to get away … using going to NY to be in Alice Underground.… He told me he wanted to leave the cult desperately, and this is what they do when someone knows that.” She was referring here to her perception that the Church of Scientology had been harassing her and Blake. “Never heard of these people. This is completely untrue,” Scientology spokeswoman Karin Pouw told the Los Angeles Times. [/quote]

In the lawsuit they were going to file Beck was going to be featured heavily in the suit as was Mr Tom Cruise. Don't know about any of that, but it's just interesting. They allege that he used his influence to not get her film made.

[quote]His report had also included an account of how “eleven top Scientologists, including [Scientology founder L. Ron] Hubbard’s wife, were sent to prison in the early 1980s for infiltrating, burglarizing and wiretapping more than 100 private and government agencies in attempts to block their investigations.”

In his Manual of Justice, from 1959, Hubbard wrote, “People attack Scientology, I never forget it, always even the score. People attack auditors, or staff, or organisations, or me. I never forget until the slate is clear.”[/quote]

Ok.

[quote]It started, they said, with repeated phone calls late at night. Sometimes the person on the other end of the line would just hang up, and sometimes he would say something to the effect of “Did you have a good meeting today?” Then there were men, Duncan said, who would show up outside their house in Venice Beach, sometimes standing watching them, sometimes sitting in a car. She began taking pictures of out-of-state license plates. It became an obsession. She took “hundreds of pictures.” [/quote]

I have had so many targets write to me to tell me the same thing about the cars that follow them, and attempts to write down license plates.

[quote]It didn’t—at least not in Duncan’s mind. So convinced was she of what was going on that she e-mailed a Los Angeles Times reporter and tried to get her to write a story about it (she didn’t respond). It started to seem to her that no one could be trusted, that everyone was suspect. How did these people watching them know so much about them? She came to believe that someone was informing on them. [/quote]

If they really only understood the creepy system that truly exists in society. Most people never will. They are so hopelessly attached and dependent on the system.

[quote]Duncan wrote screeds on her blog (which she launched in 2005) about people she claimed were connected to C.I.A. plots and right-wing conspiracies: [/quote]

[quote]In May, Duncan published on her blog a long conversation with Morales on topics such as MK-Ultra and Operation Chaos—actual C.I.A. mind-control and surveillance programs between the 50s and the 70s. She announced on the blog (two days before she died) that she was writing a piece called “The Devil and Dick Cheney”—“a metaphysical investigation,” Morales explained, into whether the vice president “could actually be Satan.” [/quote]

Sounds interesting that she wrote about some of the things that TI's might come across. MK Ultra, mind control, etc.

[quote]Morales remembers how, one night at the Beatrice, Duncan, surrounded by fashionable friends, prodded him to tell everyone about Operation Garden Plot—a U.S. military plan to respond to what it calls “domestic civil disturbances”—which Morales sees as part of the military’s “war on dissent.” “Civil disturbance” can also mean “protest.”[/quote]

Never heard of Garder Plot before, new thing, old thing?

[quote]He offered to contact his friend Alex Jones about doing a Scientology show on his nationally syndicated radio program (The Alex Jones Show), which specializes in government secrets and conspiracies. Blake liked the idea. In January, he had sent someone an e-mail promoting Jones as a “colorful Texas populist who has hipster credibility.” It was through Jones’s show that he had become familiar with the “9/11 truth movement” and its questioning of the U.S. government’s so-called “official story.” He had e-mailed friends about this too. He now became a semi-regular attendee at the Sunday-night 9/11-truth meetings at St. Mark’s Church, which Morales oversees. Morales said, “He was talking about doing art around 9/11 truth.”[/quote]

A lot of roads lead to 9/11 truth, but when will that really ever happen?

[quote]The night before her suicide, July 9, Duncan, Blake, George Pelecanos, and producer Cary Woods had a meeting at a restaurant in Washington, near where Pelecanos lives. It was a good meeting, ending with the ol’ Hollywood high fives. Pelecanos liked Blake and Duncan’s ideas, and Woods was on board to produce Nick’s Trip (although he hasn’t had a big success in a few years, Woods was still a name in the independent-film world Blake and Duncan had confidence in).
Pelecanos, who had met the couple only once before, said, “You could tell they were really into each other, like when you first date a woman and you are in the phase where you can’t get enough of each other. The last time I saw them, they were walking across the street holding hands.”

The next afternoon, July 10, back in New York, Blake came home to have lunch with Duncan at about three p.m., as he often did. [/quote]

This is the part of the article that really get's my attention. I mean she was finally getting some good vibes about getting Nick's Trip produced. She has lunch with Jeremy the person who knew her best in the world, who picked up no signs of anything amiss, then decides to kill herself? Anything is possible, but someone should be looking into this.

[quote]Finally, around 11 p.m., the men from the morgue arrived. (The official cause of Duncan’s death was suicide by acute intoxication due to the combined effects of diphenhydramine—which is present in Benadryl and Tylenol PM—and alcohol. The New York City medical examiner’s office would not comment on whether there were other drugs found in her system.) [/quote]

Don't know a lot about over the counter medications. I wish someone looked into this more however.

[quote]On July 17, the day before he was set to drive to Detroit with three friends—Fellows, Doherty, and Morales—for her funeral, Blake went to work, insisting he felt O.K.
He never came home. He had talked about going out to visit his friend Chris Burke, a sound designer who lives in Park Slope, Brooklyn, with whom he had been working on the voice-over for Glitterbest (“a mad stream of consciousness,” as Malcolm McLaren put it, that Duncan had written).

“I’m coming to Brooklyn anyway,” Blake told him. But he never showed up.
After leaving the Rockstar offices, on lower Broadway, he took the A train all the way out to Rockaway Beach. Coincidentally, it was the birthplace of his mother.

Around eight p.m., an unidentified woman called 911 saying she had seen a man of Blake’s description walking naked into the water. It was the last in a series of heroic gestures he made for the lovely Theresa.[/quote]

I always find this part suspicious. The anonymous woman. From what I read, no one looked for his body for days, till a person published a story on them, then his body showed up. I am not clear on that part. It all seems really off, and this is something that I think the TI community should be tackling and looking into, but not a peep.

It's been a year since I blogged about it, but it's gotten more play media wise than any other story of it's kind that I can think of.

Partners

Now someone on one of my blogs recently posted about her partner who had her committed to an institution for her Gang Stalking Activism?

I said I would create a post to address such an issue. If you are a Targeted Individual, as many know it can be hard to hold down a relationship at the best of times. It can be even harder when you face the issues that we do, it can be triple times as hard when we finally decide to do something about it and start your activism.

Now anyone who would threaten or try to have you committed for Gang Stalking Activism might not be a good person to have in your life, that's the first thing that I wanted to say, and in my opinion you would be better off without such a person, a person who will not support you, respect you, or appreciate you in the long run can only serve to bring you down, and probably bring you a lot of unnecessary issues.

I think many of us realise that we are going to spend long chunks of time alone. In some ways I prefer to be alone. I really do. I don't have to worry about who to trust, catering to childish tantrums, needy, clingy, individuals. I can be by myself and responsible for myself and for the most part I really like that. Like anyone else I would like to have someone in my life, but how many people can realistically deal with my situation?I have not in the last two years found anyone who can truly do that, and right now I don't think I am looking.

It's taken two years for me to deal or come to terms with everything. I mean it's only been a week or so since I stopped going, I can't believe the world is like this. How many people could handle what Jeremy and Theresa went through? How many people could support and truly be there for someone in that situation? I personally have not met anyone like that. Keep in mind that

http://nymag.com/news/features/36091/

"The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.” - Martin Luther King, Jr.
However how many of us are really going to met people that fit this bill?

If you are a guy you need someone like a Buffy, Zena, or Wonder Woman type. Someone who can take care of themselves to a degree. Who has a good head on their shoulders. If you plan to do any activism, you don't want to deal with fits and temper tantrums. You don't want to deal with someone who is going to hold you back. No Delilah's.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSjXBWkLyvs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5a6fniE2po

You need someone who can support you. Sure it might be nice to have Nancy home maker, but for a long term relationship, you will have to find someone who can roll with the punches and hold the fort down while you are out doing what you need to be doing. Maybe even someone who can be out there doing it with you.

If you don't plan to go at it alone, then it's important that you find someone who is not an intimate infiltration, and someone who has some idea of what is going on, who believes you. Someone who you can trust. Trust can be betrayed, don't get me wrong, but try to find someone that you are not constantly wondering about.

You will also need someone that can take care of your kids if something should happen to you. A bit of loyalty would not hurt.

If you are female stay away from people who threaten to put you in mental institutions for your Gang Stalking Activism.

Now if you are female, might I suggest a Kyle type or Spike from BTVS. The same is true for the ladies in the TI community as it is for the guys.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SG1rpgHQ934
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rmOkKydUJ0

You need someone who understands you, someone who respects and appreciates your efforts, someone who's ego is not going to get in the way of your activism. Stay away from guys who are children themselves and have to be taken care of.

You need someone with a certain strength of character, who can stay at home if that is what you need. Someone who can uplift and who will not bring you down, or hold you down. Someone who does not expect you to play second fiddle, to their base. Find someone who does not expect you to be second best to anything or to anyone.

Just do the best you can. Being a target makes it harder to find someone, but easier in other ways. Your pool of potential candidates is going to be smaller, because of intimate infiltrations and the like. Yet if you do find someone that fits the bill, your changes of some moments of happiness should be better.

Many families were destroyed because of Cointelpro and infiltrations. I am not saying that if you are lucky enough to find someone that that is the end of the struggle, it can make it harder in many ways, because you then have someone else to be responsible for. Strong happy committed relationships are hard to come by, and if you find one then you are lucky, and that is just what this program of persecution does not want you to do.

I have a lot more to say on the subject, but mostly I wanted to say, don't give up hope, and if the path does leave you alone, broken, bloodied, remember you are not alone, we all face the same struggles to one degree or another. We must never stop hoping or being true to ourselves, it's our best chance of finding true happiness.

Videos courtesy of YouTube and their perspective owners.

Double suicide, sounds like gang stalking. Part 2

Wit of the staircase

[quote]The harassment Mr. Wit and I are still enduring featured as its centerpiece an FBI file I earned as an undergrad in Detroit for protesting the plant closings there and doing other labor organizing. I also wrote several eloquent articles for Wayne State University's student newspaper demanding a Federal investigation into the Iran-Contra cover up when I was a freshman.

Wit's family has generations of working class factory workers on my father's side, and generations of academic specialists in radical political movements on my mother's side. My mother, who currently works at Wayne State University and has a PhD in politcal science that is focused on Black Panther and other radical movements in the Midwest, also recently received harassing phone calls, as did my younger brother.
[/quote]

That is in Theresa Duncan’s own words. I have no way of confirming if she really did have an FBI file, but if it's anything like spying101.com then large chunks of democratic societies do. In a controlled society such as this, we probably all have files to an extent, be it eschelon, or other spying programs. We now even have approval for satellites that can see through buildings, and underground bunkers.

Washington Post

[quote]
The Bush administration has approved a plan to expand domestic access to some of the most powerful tools of 21st-century spycraft, giving law enforcement officials and others the ability to view data obtained from satellite and aircraft sensors that can see through cloud cover and even penetrate buildings and underground bunkers.[/quote]



I do know that according to what others have said about her blog, that in life she spoke and wrote well, very eloquent, and sophisticated.

In death I know that there is a concerted effort to make her look increasingly paranoid, and like someone who would take her life, and the truth is probably somewhere in between.

Theresa and Jeremy if they were targets of this sort of societal harassment had money, and his career was from what I have read was rising. This alone would set them apart from other targets.

Other things I found out about them, in my brief information collection session.

http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/the-theresa-duncan-tragedy/16942/?page=2

[quote]Then, a manager at Magnet questioned the racially tinged humor and recommended that the Shoo-fly Pie project be shelved. Gesue says Duncan lost control, shouting wildly — and was escorted from the building — a story confirmed to the Weekly by another former Magnet employee. Other staff packed up Duncan’s office things. Yet the two estranged friends still “had to do a photo shoot. It was awful. It was the last time I saw her.”[/quote]

It would be nice to have both sides of this story. Again it's too common for people to have their reputations trashed and they get to have no recourse after the fact.

Blogtown

[quote]

This morning, the LA Times has a fascinating story that chronicles the couple’s detachment from reality. One tidbit from the story really jumped out:


Blake and Duncan were sure people were conspiring against them — in particular, the Church of Scientology.

In a 27-page “chronology” written by Blake in October in preparation for a lawsuit against the church that was never filed, he alleges the couple was “methodically defamed, harassed, followed and threatened” by Scientologists. The document lists Tom Cruise, filmmaker-artist-author Miranda July, writer-director Paul Thomas Anderson, former Viacom Chief Executive Tom Freston, alternative rocker Beck and Art Forum Editor Tim Griffin, among others, as players in the dispute. In addition, a number of Hollywood talent agents and major league art collectors were accused of being in on the conspiracy…

Also in the chronology, Miranda July is accused of spreading unspecified defamation about Duncan in New York and is identified as a “Scientologist filmmaker” even though she is not affiliated with the church. July declined to comment. And a spokeswoman for the Church of Scientology, Karin Pouw, called the conspiracy allegations “bizarre.”

It’s clear that Blake’s accusation is baseless; the article also writes, “In the spring of 2006, according to the chronology, Blake and Duncan began documenting cars with Florida license plates and graffiti (some allegedly resembling Duncan’s signature) in their neighborhood as more evidence of the conspiracy. Around this time, Blake tossed urine onto the barbecue of neighbors who the couple suspected were Scientologists.”
[/quote]

The more I read little blurbs like this it reminds me of things other targets have described, and the difficulty many have had with trying to prove high profile members of society are in on things. Why is it so hard to believe for those who don't know. Not only is this societal to begin with, but society is like one big sorority. I would not be surprised if many of the assertations they were making had some validity to them. I would however be surprised if it could ever be proven.

It's also interesting how they were focused in on scientologists as the main people stalking and harassing them, alternatively I have encountered others who are focused on Masons, others who focus on gangs, other who focus on extremist groups, other who focus on religious groups. Yet they all seem to be correct in their own ways. In their micro-cosem, that is what they are experiencing, but on a macro scale it's more elaborate, and wide scale than ever dreamed possible. It's a complete systemic system of control, and they just use whatever is handy, but also it would seem that they try to use nemesis, or groups you might not like, they play of fear, racism, sexism, phobia's, stereotypes.

If you are rich they use the poor, if you are black they use white, if you are poor they use the rich, if you are gay they use religious groups, I have had religious people tell me that they are being stalked by groups of gay men, and I have had others tell me it's gangs that they are being stalked by, and others tell me it's most definitely Masons. See I no longer doubt they are all correct and yet all wrong.

I don't know what these groups are being told about the people that get targeted, but since this is societal anyways, does it really matter?



Calanderlive

[quote]
In the spring of 2006, according to the chronology, Blake and Duncan began documenting cars with Florida license plates and graffiti (some allegedly resembling Duncan's signature) in their neighborhood as more evidence of the conspiracy. Around this time, Blake tossed urine onto the barbecue of neighbors who the couple suspected were Scientologists. He and Duncan were living in an office complex adjacent to Muse Productions' Venice offices after having been evicted from their apartment when Schlei encountered Blake shortly before the couple moved to New York in early 2007.

"He got a job at Rockstar," Schlei said. "He said, 'I like New York better. It's going to be awesome. I'm going into a new phase.' "

After the couple moved into the church apartment, Father Morales recalls them rapidly integrating into the church community. The two attended service every Sunday, a new thing for them, and kept a Bible on their coffee table. On July 3, Duncan helped orchestrate a benefit for restoration of the church.

Asked if he thought Blake and Duncan were running away from something, Morales said: "They felt they were being harassed by certain individuals. I have no way of knowing if it's true. I'd say, 'You're here now. We'll protect you.' I did sense they felt this was a sanctuary for them. They felt they had gotten away."[/quote]


I did read that she had been writing about MK Ultra and so it would seem they were not unfamiliar with Mind Control programs, wither they knew about the gang stalking aspect of it is still not clear. It does seem that they somewhat fled from L.A. to New York earlier this year, but the fresh start did them little good. I find it interesting the mention of graffiti found resembling Duncan's signature. It brings back memories of the suicide note that Anthony Brina found in his own handwriting, that he did not write.

When stuff like this happens I guess it's just easier for society to write them off as paranoids that took their own lives, not saying that that's not what happened, but from everything that I can see, they do seem to fit with what other gang stalking targets have gone through.

They started going to church and kept a copy of the bible on their coffee table. Not much point in running from something that is systemic, but you can try. Moving in this case did not help. The interesting thing is that even with money, social standing and popularity it did not help stop this assault. Much like when John Lennon reported being followed around. From what I have read of Duncan her blog was extremely popular, and well read and liked, yet there was no one it seems who could help them. They still grew increasingly cut off and isolated, well why not, when everyone is in on the joke but you.

It's sad, not just because they were more visible targets than others, but something out there should have been able to come to their rescue in time. I know there is no point of trying to make sense of this right now, I mean without all the details and background information, it's hard to put together a full picture.

I guess I will do what I can do which is just pray for them. Hope that they have found safety and peace that they could not find here. Do my best to help the targets that are here, and hope that someday people find the will, and the understanding to see that a system that does things like this to seemingly nice people, is probably not a good system.

The sad part is this will probably hold the worlds interest for all of two seconds and then they will move on to the next scoope and the next scandal, but for those two seconds, I hope that we can try to illicit something good from this, something useful, so that things may be better for other targets of this insane system, that seemingly controls society.

Double suicide. Sounds like gang stalking

Calanderlive


This artice was brought to my attention. It's regarding the double suicde of two people. The thing that's interesting about their suicide is that it sounds like gang stalking.

Here are some choice clips.

[quote]It's been just eight days since rising art star Jeremy Blake was seen wandering into the ocean off New York's Rockaway Beach -- presumably to his death -- a week after he discovered that his blogger-filmmaker girlfriend, Theresa Duncan, had taken her life in their East Village apartment.

But the apparent double suicide of this glamorous, intellectual couple has confounded and disturbed the art world in New York, London and Los Angeles, where they lived together for several years. Many were shocked by the turn of events while others noted that the couple had acted strangely in their final months together.

[b]According to several friends and art world peers, the two believed they were being stalked and harassed by Scientologists, an abiding fear that soured old friendships and made some of their respective working relationships difficult.[/b] [/quote]



They thought they were being stalked by scientologists. Other targets think it's just Masons, others think it's religious groups, others think it's skin heads, others think it's gangs. It's societal, and it's happening to more people than I ever dared to dream or imagine, most times it never hit's the papers. The only time you get hints of this are in the case of people like Kilmeer Gill the Montreal shooter, if they left a blog, other wise you usually don't get this info published. This is usually never published because it's systemic, and it's being used to control certain people, the reason we are even hearing about this more is because we have the Internet. It's been happening for how long in society? We just never realized.


[quote]Christine Nichols, a colleague and friend of Blake's since 1998, produced two art exhibitions, two books and a record in conjunction with the artist through the New York art gallery she co-founded, Works on Paper Inc. Nichols dates the couple's rising sense of "paranoia" to around 2004, two years after Blake created an album cover for alternative-rock star Beck, who is a practicing Scientologist.

"They thought Scientologists were really harassing them," Nichols said. "They would say, 'They are following us, harassing our landlord.' I did not see any evidence of that.[/quote]

No body ever sees evidence of that. So the targets come off looking all paranoid. The same thing that I have talked about for the last year. The landlord being harassed, they are lucky that they even found that much out. Most targets never do. See in their case in was scientologists, I have had gay men tell me it's religious groups, and I have had others tell me it's skin heads, others tell me it's Masons.

[quote]"But it got to be something that was huge to them -- a 'You're either with us or against us' thing where if you didn't believe them, you weren't on their side. The story they had woven in paranoia and conspiracies took over part of their lives. A lot of us couldn't understand that acting out."[/quote]


This is the sad part, it forces the targets into this sense of isolation. You don't want to be isolated, but when you are coming up against something so weird and all encompassing this is usually the safest path and most targets will choose this path. I have heard of other couples targeted this way. I always thought it would be easier if there were two targets instead of one, but I have not seen any evidence of that. Being stalked and targeted is being stalked and targeted, single or together.


[quote]Duncan and Blake, who were together for 12 years, are recalled as an impossibly good-looking, intellectually vigorous and socially popular pair of soul mates who moved gracefully among a set of likewise brainy, moneyed people who occupy the intersection of art and technology on both coasts.

According to Lance Kinz, director of Kinz, Tillou and Feigen gallery in New York, which shows Blake's digital paintings and films, Duncan's suicide and Blake's disappearance have confounded many people.

"They were both highly ambitious and successful and had achieved a lot. They were energetic in their creative pursuits," Kinz said. "The biggest surprise is that Jeremy would sacrifice what he had worked so hard to achieve and had been so excited about.[/quote]


Sounds like they probably fit the target profile very well. However until I can find out more I don't want to judge it too much.

Then there is the question of her suicide. If they really were targets, was her death really a suicide? How about his?

There are so many weird variables when it comes to gang stalking and so many questions that you have to ask yourself.

I do know this for sure however, if they were targets, and they did die, then we failed, just a little bit. As targets of this harassment, our jobs should be getting the word out, blogging, posting on forums, and just making as many people aware of this as possible.

It's possible that if they were targets of this, that they had no idea about gang stalking or the rest of this. I am ever increasingly surprised at how isolated targets can become when it comes to this stuff.

I do believe if you are a target of this societal form of control, that it's your job to make none targets, and unaware targets aware of what is going on. The poor me thing only goes so far, remember if you are aware of this stuff, then you are luckier than most targets, and you know that you are not alone.

I just found out about it, so I have not had a chance to research it or find out more, but before the article is removed from cyber space, I thought it would be best to post and blog about it. (I am not joking, the washington post link has already been removed, renamed, not found, whatever.)

Washington Post

I would say more, but I am going to keep this posting really short.