Gang Stalking

A upto date blog about my adventures with gangstalking. This is my way of sharing with the world what gang stalking is really like. Some helpful books. Gang Stalking Books Mobbing Books

Monday, April 26, 2010

Credibility Reviews

What informants like to do. They like to use good information to pimp their websites. Mixing in the bad with the good.

I recently came across a video using the book Bridging The Gap. Now the video is for the website multistalkervictims.

This site belongs to a person named Eleanor White. Eleanor decided to create what she calls a credibility website. On that website she uses it to descredit sites. I have spoken to her about this practice, and what I think of it, but the practice still continues.

She has never reviewed FFCHS or The Hidden Evil, but she was kind enough to review Gang Stalking World. Needless to say, I have blogged several times about what I think about this.

On that site she also used the oppertunity to try to descredit the book Bridging The Gap, which has done well despite her.

This is not about Eleanor. I deeply disagree with her actions, but I am not saying anything bad about her in this post. I have pointed out several times what I think she is using the site for, I think it's horrible, because new targets come online and they might be naive enough to take her at her word, thus making them avoid sites that are actually there to help them, but that is the idea right.

The video that I came across though well done, uses several books, to pimp the multistalkervictim site, which is Eleanor, whites site. The videos seem to link several books to these sites, when in fact they have nothing to do with it. It's not a big deal in the short term, but in the long term I think it's what informants do. They use credible inforamtion to link to sites that might not be affliated to that source.


Eg. It would be like me using Terrorist Stalking In America to link it to Gang Stalking World. The two should never meet, it would be a classless move and simply not well done.

Anyways in my opinion if books are going to be used to pimp sites, then they should use information that those sites approve. I don't think informants can use any old book to pimp any old site. Just my opinion.

This practice don't not pass my credibility review and it's not ok.

I think informants can cross many lines, but this is not one of them.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I speculate that David Lawson has some good points in his book, and he does expose gangstalking. Like everything else, targets should take this book with a grain of salt. Personally, I don't think Lawson was trying to spread disinfo, but may have been pressured or made deals with his own perps in order to make his situation better. So the book should be treated with skepticism by targets.

In my opinion, there is not one single word spoken or read that should not be treated with skepticism by targets. Treat every piece of information as suspect, unless it agrees with your experience and intuition. Same with Lawson's book. He does give a glimpse into how harassment groups work, but just treat it with skepticism until you can verify it with your own personal experience. All else should just be thrown away, i.e. in one ear and out the other, as they say.

Gaslighting is a very important part of control of a target. So when a close friend tells you something, right away just start to analyze what he or she said, and realize some of it was meant to mislead you into doing something you shouldn't. That sort of thing.

Monday, April 26, 2010  
Blogger gang stalking said...

I speculate that David Lawson probably has a lot of good points and accurate information.

It's the 5% disinfo that get's you. Now if Lawson just claimed to be an average person and not a detective that would be one thing, but he claims to be an expert.

He also claims to have traveled with them for 12 years. I examined what was going on for months to realize it was a community level program that was going on in various cities.

He tells people it's stalking gangs or extremists. The truth is it's community notifications, and systemic destruction.

I think that even good intentioned people can draw wrong conclusions.

My problem with David Lawson's book are the parts where he says if you see one of them dress as a cop, step on their foot, it brings them back to a sense of reality. Sure it will. It will have the target in a mental ward so fast it will make their heads spin.

He then came back saying it was terrorists in his second book. I don't want to judge him, but I believe his book and many of these sites were set up to mislead and misdirect. I usually leave the sites that are misdirecting alone, I can't fight every battle.

His book or parts of it that might be harmful, like telling innocent people to step on an officer were my concern. I didn't want to see naive, but good people do something and get put away.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010  
Blogger gang stalking said...

I also agree you should not take every single word spoken or read. I am doing what I can, but as a target I have had to literally research every bit of info gained. I do agree personal experience is the way to do.

I always suggest targets do that, cause of all the bs online, but also even with good intentions research is just your own research, wrong conclusions can be drawn, but at least you show people how you got to that conclusion.

Yes that part of not trusting some people. See offline and online, you have to watch what you do and say.

For these targets and their I feel special club they knew the whole time, and they tried to protect it while innocent people were trying to find out what was going on. I think that is the worst thing they did. So many innocent people could have been helped if they had only known.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home