Reflections

Reflections

I was just reflecting on when this first started. Before I knew about Gang Stalking. Like other targets I knew that something was wrong, that something was going on, and that those around me were "in on it." Unlike other targets, I never voiced any of this out loud, and never mentioned it. However when I did try to explain about some of the unusual things that were happening, and that something was going on, they would just act like nothing was happening.

What I do know is that if I had trusted those around me, and not listened to my instincts, I would be in a very different place, a very bad place. I am grateful to God that I trusted those instincts, I am grateful to God that I prayed. I knew something was going on, and at one point, I remember praying and preparing myself, and saying that no matter what it was, that I would be ready for it, and willing and able to accept it.

Well it was more horrific than I could have thought at the time. For those who followed the blog, you know I spent like the first two years, going I can't believe this is happening, or that this is real. I use to wake up everyday, and then at some point I would say that. I think it wasn't until my settling in post, that some kind of acceptance finally came to me, and remember that I thought I was ready for the truth.

But before this time, knowing that friends, family, co-workers, business associates, were involved in something, that something was going on, but not knowing what was hard. I couldn't talk to anyone about it, I could only take counsel with myself, and in prayers with God, asking for truth. Praying to understand, how those around me, and close to me could be made to go along with something that was clearly designed to destroy me.

Also remember that no one, no sane person wants to believe in conspiracies. No one wants to believe that those around you could be plotting against you. Remember that to accuse someone of something without proof is a horrible thing, and what if you are wrong? That's why for the longest time I just observed. It would be the worst thing in the world to point the finger at an innocent person without being sure, but at the same time, you don't want to be a fool and let anyone conspire against you. So that's why I often tell targets, write things down, observe overtime, the truth will come. Cause it's a hard position to be in.

So when I do observe something new, I don't always report it at first, somethings I will wait awhile, but if it's something important for targets, something that could be harmful for them, then I might break that rule, and report an observation that I have not had time to confirm, or observe further. There are some things, that you can't always put off, it's better to issue a warning for other targets, just so that they can have a heads up.

The other things is that if you report something, people tend to see it, eg. If you report someone as mentally ill, people will see mental illness that is just not there. If you report someone as a sexual pervert, people will see every little thing that person does as somehow sexually perverted. People are just interesting that way.

Those were some dark times. I mean I get now some of the process that happens. The hapless family and friends, get a letter telling them that the person could be a sexual pervert, a danger to themselves or others, involved in drugs, prostitution, pedophilia, whatever the fake accusation is. Don't get me wrong at times these accusation the odd time, might be true, but what happens with Gang Stalking, is that the target is repeatedly set up. On top of these letters, there are interviews that can happen with friends, family, co-workers. The problem is there is no way to know how leading these interviews are, or if people always thought that James was a little odd, and someone shows up asking if James could be a danger, then suddenly James is a psychopath capable of doing great harm. Where in reality James is no more dangerous than anyone else.

They create a self fulfilling prophecies, and there is no way to know how many in society have been destroyed this way by these lies. Friends and family then get the community reports, and as target we all know the lies, set up's, and rumours that go into this. Reports all over the city, linked to you, places you have never been, situations that you have never been in, lies, rumours, and set up's, but they all contribute to destroying the targets life.

It took a lot to hold onto the faith. I knew I was not crazy, I know I am not crazy, at least not in that sense of the word. I knew there was something going on, instinctively I felt it, and when I finally knew about Gang Stalking, and I listened to all the other reports, I was shocked and disgusted. I kept thinking, what is it about targets, why are our families, friends, co-workers, neighbours, willing to side against us, with whoever is doing this? Later I realised it was the state, and that this sort of thing had happened in Russia, East Germany. I understood a bit more about how a society gets corrupted. How a society comes to believe that the evil they are doing is actually something good. World War I Germany, or the Germany of 1933 comes to mind.

When these times happens, the society itself becomes sick. They naturally do not see it, but history will judge them, it's always the same, but at the time, they believe in the Righteousness of their actions, McCarthyism comes to mind. In Russia, when they sent people off to the gulags, they would have family come and sign testimony against the person, they would even get the person to believe that they were bad. If the state said that you were bad, you were. It's horrifying to look at history and to see, and understand how often this sick, collective insanity happens, but you have the witch trials, inquisitions, this is a reoccurring theme, and people should be mindful of it.

Anyways over the years, I have been able to forgive, some people have made amends for the evils they have done, but still I sit back and think, if the state came to me, and tried to get me to go along with something this sick against friends and family would I have back them? See now that I am aware, it's less likely, but before, when I was naive, and trusted the state, could they have manipulated me that way? I don't know. The one time that I do think that I saw this, and was a part of this was back in school. At school we had a guy in class that this girl accused of being a pervert, or doing something very perverted and gross. Not only did did this precious flower accuse him, but she had her little minions with her to back up her story. Now I was disgusted when I heard this, like everyone else, and for a time stayed my distance, but after a time, seeing how everyone else was treating this person, I grew disgusted by the group ostracism of this person, and decided to go against the grain. I loaned this personhomework assignments and when handing out or sharing things with the group, did not exclude this person. Naturally I became the enemy of the original accuser. Which was funny, because this girl tried to use intimidation, and tried to socially annex me for associating with the person. It did not work, but the guy did end up leaving school, and did not finish the program. Years later now, I can almost 99.99% say that I am pretty sure that what they were doing to him, is what we call Gang Stalking. I think that is the one time, that I can think of where I might have been on the wrong end of the fence, and although at first I did stay away, cause of what this original girl had disclosed, I am glad in the long run I ignored her. She would later go on to spreading fake rumours about another friend of mine, and then eventually me. In the long run, I think people figured out her true and vicious nature, but I think it was deeper than that. I think this girl aside from the others, probably had aspecific agenda, when I look back and put all the pieces into place, that is what comes through the most. Why this guy became a target, I don't know, but that is what I think he was. I also now know what they were signalling about. Back then they were always signalling to each other. I kept thinking, what are they signalling about? Now that I know about the one handed sign language that the citizen informants use, I can look at the past, and get a pretty good idea of what was happening, and based on the type of people this girl targeted get a pretty good idea of what was likely really happening.


I included this, because I think it's important for people to try to understand the other side of the picture. I am most definitely not a bad person, I was at the time trying to support this girl at first, by staying away from someone she and her friends had said had done something perverted and gross. To the guy in this story, I can't imagine what it was like showing up to that course, to have everyone thinking this about you, and I think this explains why he missed so much time, and eventually quit. At the time however I would only have seen my part, but again I am glad that eventually my part was the role of being helpful, and not sticking to what the group was doing. The ones sticking to what the group was doing, were they trying to do anything evil? No, I can honestly say, they just felt they were getting rid of someone perverted from their midst's, and that is how this can work. They only see their part of it, which is small and insignificant, the paper cuts that on their own do not matter, but collectively, can and do destroy.

So reflections have been very important. Observation, and trusting instincts. The other thing about not reporting incidents too soon is that it's easy to send out information, but it's hard to collect that information back. Also once people get something into their heads it's hard to correct that information, so that's why most times if I can, I try to hold off on reporting things till I can be sure. Recently I skipped this step in reporting an observation, that I can not confirm, or deny. But it was more important for the protection of targets that they be aware that this could be happening in their areas, and to take precaution. I had to weight two options, and hope that the right choice was made, and that if the observation is real, that it will prove itself in time, and if not, then it will clear itself in time. What I should say is that I know that in other cases, this observation is true and happening, in the case I observed recently, I do not have concrete proof one way or another, and leave it in the realm of this is what I thought I observed on one occasion, which would never hold up for me personally in any scientific regard.

Observation should happen over a period of time, and be consistent. Like when I was observing the hand signals, that they use. So I am going to leave it at that. Sometimes you have to trust your instincts, and just go with that. Other times if you can, it's always better to find concrete proof if you can, and in all cases, try not to jump the gun, take time, and hope that truth will come.

Buring the candles at both ends

Buring the candles at both ends.

After reading Mark's post and finding that my situation was similar to his in ways that i did not like, I decided to make some drastic changes to some areas in my life that needed changing. I think those changes are going in the right direction, even though the short term outlook is not good, the long term outlook is fairly good.

I still have the same mentally underdeveloped informants in my realm. At least one in this batch, seems especially nasty, and I can't help wishing him unwell, hey that's just me. Interpret that however you like, you whiny crybaby.

Otherwise my focus is in several areas, trying to get everything done. Trying not to get sucked into the drama of others, and trying to find the best way to untangle.

From what I have read, the system in many countries is being used in horrible ways. Husbands who are sick of their wives are having them committed for no reason what so ever. Using the flimsiest of excuses. It's incredible.

http://psychrights.org/index.htm

The state is listing people as a danger to themselves or others on the flimsiest excuses, and as I have mentioned dozens of times, there is a conspiracy that happens within all of this, of those around the target systemically trying to destroy the persons life. For me, it's trying to divide and conquer, or keep me financially where I don't need to be. Dependency on the system is not a good thing in any capacity.

Have not had a chance to check for an update on Mark, but when you are in a situation you can see things a lot more clearly than those outside of the situation. Many people talk conspiracy, but few can actually understand what it's like or been like to have lived one.

Conspiracy is not just consisting of the state, it is consisting of friends, family, co-workers, and those around a target. The target's life is not destroyed in a bubble, it is not as first thought, the targets life is destroyed by a system, a very willing, enabling system of conspirators. Can it change? Of course it can. I have no doubt about this, but people like this system, and that is why it has not changed.

Spiritually, I am ok, but missing my happy place in spirit a bit, but not sure why? Sometimes spiritual questions can only be answered in spirit.

Am I a part of the conspiracy club? No, the answer remains the same. People are deeply stupid. I despise this system, and all that was done to me. So for me, it means not joining forces with something that I think is inheritantly evil, no matter how many times I have pointed this out on the blog, people just still do not get it.

There are many types of people in this world. Those who are victimized and they go on to do whatever they can in their power to ensure it does not happen to anyone else again. Then there are those who are victimized and do everything in their power to ensure the others are victimized in the same way or worth. A type of sick pathology. You try to help them with the one hand, and they try to drag you down with the other.

I think a lot of people that have been targeted by this system are broken in just that way, and become exactly that. I think this system likes to try to acquire people that are not a part of it, and what they can not acquire they try to destroy.

I still get the odd informant trying to gain access to my life, and they always come of pretending to be something they are not. It's funny that way. The complete lack of understanding of what a target goes through. They really just don't get it. Most think that this system is something special. I think targets understand that this system is evil. I think the way this is used is evil.

So that's my two cent's for what it's worth. Basically busy, alone in flesh, and spirit? Working towards doing what I can to get this out of my life, but to also try to make sure others are aware of what is happening with this system. Many do not yet understand what this system is, and or what it is capable of.

It means that you can not, absolutely can not trust those around you, a simple comment, question, innocent conversation, can and will be used against you. You must be wise as wolves, and innocent as doves.

("Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be shrewd as serpents and innocent as doves.) Matthew 10:16

Absolutely do not trust anyone. That sounds paranoid, but if you have lived through this system, then you understand it's reach, it's corruption, and it's capacity to destroy. Pray consistently.

Psychiatric Reprisal

The Psychiatric Reprisal

What it is

This was a practice first identified as being used in the former Soviet Union. Targets of this practice were misdiagnosed as mentally ill, many were placed in state run psychiatric facilities.

Thousands upon thousands of individuals were targeted and systemically eliminated this way before the practice was brought to light and drew international attention.

The primary targets of this practice were dissidents, activists, those who tried to exercise their rights, or who wrote or published items that the state did not approve of. Those practicing freedom of religion. Also those who practiced minority or ethnic rights.

The practice was brought to the attention of the United Nations in 1969, and brought some condemnation in 1974, but this did little to change what was happening. The practice continued. It was only in 1991 when change was happening on the world stage, that the issue was again examined in more depth and the practice seems to have diminished.

Russia is not the only country to have used this practice. The practice was also heavily used in China as well. They also used this as a way of dealing with political dissidence.

What was interesting about the research into this practice is the idea that a whole field of professionals can become corrupted and misguided in their views. Believing that any form of dissidence is a mental illness.

She could not sleep that night, and became increasingly worried during subsequent months as more instructions from Moscow appeared on her desk. They were unusual, and what was worse, they confirmed her fears of that very first night: The author, Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, was not normal. Actually, he was ill, clearly suffering from what was widely known in Soviet psychiatry as “sluggish schizophrenia.” And indeed, Gorbachev had all the symptoms: struggle for the truth, perseverance, reformist ideas, and willingness to go against the grain. My interlocutor continued to believe in her diagnosis until the Soviet Union collapsed and the windows to the world were opened wide. Only then did she realize that her concept of mental illness, shared by virtually all the approxi-mately 45,000 Soviet psychiatrists, was what was abnormal and that Gorbachev had been normal all along.

2

What is frightening is the realization of how indoctrinated these health professionals were. That they so implicitly believed the propaganda of what the state taught them to, and were willing to turn this indoctrination on innocent citizens. Just like some of the Nazi's in Germany, many were following what they had been told or taught to do.

The overwhelming multitude of Soviet psychiatrists either had never participated in the political abuse of psychiatry, had tried to avoid being trapped by authorities into taking part, or had no idea that they were hospitalizing people who according to international standards were in perfect mental health—if such a thing exists. They followed thee criteria that they had been taught by a monopolized psychiatric educational system that was dominated by the Moscow School headed by Professor Snezhnevsky. They had been cut off from international psychiatry and had no knowledge of what their colleagues in the outside, “bourgeois” world believed. If any information trickled through, it was immediately seen as an offspring of degenerated bourgeois societies.

2

Many times we like to view these individuals as evil. Denizens of the state who cruelly and unconscionably tortured and falsely inprisioned innocent citizens, but what history is repeatedly showing time and again is that things are often not the cut and dried. These psychiatrist in many cases apparently did not realise the evil that they were doing. They in many cases were following a criteria, a set of standards laid out for them, by a governing body, and anyone who fell into specific criterias, were automatically labelled mentally ill.

They were part of a society in which private initiative, independent thinking, and going against the grain were, at the least, considered dangerous and were often branded criminal. They were part of a society that was taught that anybody who was different, both in thought and in appearance, was “not normal” and thereby almost inherently was “antisocial” and “antisocialist.” When combined with the theories of “sluggish schizophrenia,” this training made it very easy to convince rankand-file psychiatrists, who had only a Soviet education and no access to world psychiatry, that any person who went against the Communist Party and was willing to risk the happiness of both his family and himself had to be mentally ill.

2

These professional had a limited lens by which to judge, and so they went with what they had been taught, they followed the guidelines without question, and placed people into categories based on predetermined criterias. Could the same pattern be re-emerging in other societies? Could these same patterns be happening in democratic countries? Could health professionals also be following a set of criteria, and misdiagnosing perfectly healthy individuals as mentally unwell, schizophrenic, without having ever met them face to face, based solely on predetermined criteria?

Dissidents were held for observation in the fourth (“political”) department, and in most cases mental illness was the eventual diagnosis—almost invariably accompanied by a diagnosis of “sluggish schizophrenia.” When the investigative commission reviewed the files, the retired psychiatrist recognized many names under the diagnoses: former colleagues, sometimes friends, known to her as good professionals. The diagnoses were composed as though she had written them herself: the same style, the same terminology, and probably the same conclusions. Yet when the commission subsequently examined the 60 former victims in person, she was shocked, devastated.

2

What is really scary is how these diagnosis were handed out and delivered. By her own admission this psychiatrist would likely have put many of these individuals away, yet in person they still remained healthy fully functioning individuals, even after years of surviving the Soviet hell that they were put through.

As I said earlier, after the fall of the Soviet regime we found that the truth about Soviet psychiatry was even more horrific than we had imagined. The political abuse of psychiatry was only the tip of the iceberg. The Soviet regime had ostracized any person who was not productive, who did not fulfill the image of the healthy socialist person laboring for the common good—the radiant communist future.

2

Could these same criteria be slowly getting implemented in many democratic societies? Could this same agenda be making it's way to the west? Will the citizens of the western world soon experience what their counter parts in the former Soviet Union did? A systemic abuse of power that targets 1 in 3 political prisoners?. A practice that touched possibly millions of innocent lives?

Approximately one in three political prisoners were held in psychiatric hospitals rather than in camps and prisons. Yet, the thousands of victims of these political abuses form only the tip of the iceberg of millions of Soviet citizens who fell victim to totalitarian Soviet psychiatry.

2

The American Psychiatric Association is said to be writing it's soon to be updated version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and the criteria for mental illness might surprise some individuals.

Credibility Reviews

What informants like to do. They like to use good information to pimp their websites. Mixing in the bad with the good.

I recently came across a video using the book Bridging The Gap. Now the video is for the website multistalkervictims.

This site belongs to a person named Eleanor White. Eleanor decided to create what she calls a credibility website. On that website she uses it to descredit sites. I have spoken to her about this practice, and what I think of it, but the practice still continues.

She has never reviewed FFCHS or The Hidden Evil, but she was kind enough to review Gang Stalking World. Needless to say, I have blogged several times about what I think about this.

On that site she also used the oppertunity to try to descredit the book Bridging The Gap, which has done well despite her.

This is not about Eleanor. I deeply disagree with her actions, but I am not saying anything bad about her in this post. I have pointed out several times what I think she is using the site for, I think it's horrible, because new targets come online and they might be naive enough to take her at her word, thus making them avoid sites that are actually there to help them, but that is the idea right.

The video that I came across though well done, uses several books, to pimp the multistalkervictim site, which is Eleanor, whites site. The videos seem to link several books to these sites, when in fact they have nothing to do with it. It's not a big deal in the short term, but in the long term I think it's what informants do. They use credible inforamtion to link to sites that might not be affliated to that source.


Eg. It would be like me using Terrorist Stalking In America to link it to Gang Stalking World. The two should never meet, it would be a classless move and simply not well done.

Anyways in my opinion if books are going to be used to pimp sites, then they should use information that those sites approve. I don't think informants can use any old book to pimp any old site. Just my opinion.

This practice don't not pass my credibility review and it's not ok.

I think informants can cross many lines, but this is not one of them.

Gangs and their secrets

The informants can also be compared to a gang and how a gang functions. I have compared them to cults, gangs, secret societies, etc. It’s all the same. Members who keep a code of silence.

There are many gangs in society but this is the main one, and it comprises all of the smaller gangs or minor ones. So it incorporates, government branches, the cops, the Mafia, street gangs, masons, Scientologist, black activists, kkk, store owners, company workers, almost every religious sect you can think of. Every sector of society takes part. I don’t think I can make this any clearer. As much as they might all pretend not to get along, when the state comes calling, they will communicate together in public, and they are unified when it comes to their informant system.

Gangs rely on silence, so ofcourse this relies on silence. The snitches don’t want their I feel special club exposed.

Scientologist have Scientology, Masons have Masonry, and the snitches have this. This is their gang, their cult, their secret club. They feel special being a part of this. So yes the secrecy is a big part. They get so upset realising that outsiders know. They like this cause it makes them feel connected, belonging, like any gang or cult would. The mafia is one type of gang, so are the cops, so are street gangs, and the members join for different reasons. Many clubs have secrets, that the members are expected to uphold.

The cops, informants, and gangs use one handed sign languages. http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/category/one-handed-sign-language/

Where the cops and street gangs wear uniforms or matching colors, the informants often look like average people for the most part.

Some Gangs, some cults, some cops, some informants do underhanded things. There have been many cases where members of these groups have been caught doing illegal, immoral things.

Some Gangs, some cults, some cops, some informants are corrupt. There have been cops caught dealing drugs, informants caught in huge lies that destroy lives, cults have been known to do corrupt things as well. I think most targets are familiar with the corrupt actions of some of the informants.

Some Gangs, Some cults, some cops, some informants , use lies, bullying, intimidation, and fear to control their members. There are informants that want to speak out, but they are controlled by fear in some cases. They are lied to in others, and in some cases feel that it’s their patriotic duty to keep the secret. We have seen via gang stalking all of the above methods used to try to control and destroy the lives of targets.

The only thing with gang stalking is that it takes all the cults, gangs, cops, informants, and they are all part of one big gang. One big conspiracy of silence, and because so many people take part, many who realise what is going on lie to themselves. They believe that they are part of something that is good, nobel, protecting the city. They take part following orders instead of thinking. They pretend that this is normal, some of them see it as a good thing. To wake up to the truth that this is not normal, would shatter their reality. Many see it as power, rather than the enslavement that it truly is. To realise they are slaves, might mean doing something about it.

Many like the sense of belonging, sense of community, many on the inside don’t see things the way we do. They like the power, the connectedness, that feeling of finally fitting in, having a purpose. That is what keeps this going, and they don’t want their little secret club to be exposed.

Many people complain about cops and their blue wall of silence, or that gang members won’t snitch, or about how Masons, and other cults keep secrets, but then they turn around and they do the same thing. They keep secrets. They tell lies to keep their secrets safe. Their are hundreads of targets online saying that they are being abused by this system, but the cult/gang members still keep the secret. Then get made at other clubs or cults who do the same. It’s no different. They have their secret handshakes, you have your sign language.

Lies, manipulation, bullying, murder are used to keep your little system going just like any other. People who like these smaller gangs, cults, clubs, for the most part like this bigger one, cause the same things that allowed them to keep the secrets, tell the lies, do the damage, or destruction for these smaller clubs is what will cause them to do the same for this bigger club.

Gangs like their secrets, and they are willing to lie, bully, harass, intimidate, or destroy the innocent to keep these secrets. The informants in many cases are no different.

Fits the description

Troubling incident recently.

I have mentioned this before, but I will mention it to targets again, and I would have you be on the look out for this.

I have mentioned that what I believe is ongoing in many cases to keep these so called cases of investigations ongoing are a great deal of set up's, and deliberate provocations, so let me go over a couple of recent incidents that I have noticed.


What I have tried to do off and on is if I notice a troubling incident, I will try to report it, provided that I am aware of it. I am trying to do this, because I believe there is clear evidence to indicate that what they are doing during these investigations is that they are using other people who fit the description to try to portray targets as crazy, perverts, drug dealers, etc, whatever they are trying to portray you as, they will them if they can't get you, you get what I like to refer to as doppelgangers to do the dirty work for them.

I use the term doppelgangers very loosely, because these people are not doppelgangers, they are simply what I call fits the description. In other words if you are male, 45, white, 6'4 that is what they would ruffly try to use. The person does not have to look like you, dress like you, or anything else, they just have to fit the description. So if they are trying to get you to look like a pervert, they would use someone like, and have them insult females near where you are, look at them, or watch children etc. It does not have to be you, the incident just has to be attributed to you, and this will keep their investigations going, it will keep the informants who are getting paid to follow you, employed, and it keeps the need for this system going, and going.

So Eg. If you are an Asian, female, 5'2, 25, and they are trying to portray you as crazy, then let's say that they can not get you to act out in public, they will get a female, who looks around that age, most likely Asian, maybe not, and then they will have that person act out in public. What's most disturbing for me, is that I have blogged about this before, but I have seen it enough now, to be able to confirm that this is what they are doing deliberately.

I think you get the idea. What I have seen lately on a few separate occasions are that they deliberately have targets who fit the description crossing my path, (I use this term very loosely, because they dress nothing like me, and hygiene wise they look very unkempt, and I would say crazy. One Saturday as I left the house about 4 weeks ago, I had one cross my path who was talking to themselves and carry some bags in their hands, seemingly mentally unwell, but that has to be determined. Eg. I have seen informants, pretending to be crazy, I mean literally sane informants, who are pretending. In this particular instance, I do feel that the person really was crazy whoever, just by appearance, and unkempt manner, but there is no way to tell.

They were going in one direction, and I was going in another, but the thing with the informant force is they do not seem to be required to comment on appearance, or state of dress. Eg. I am always well dressed, never unkempt, and for the most part pretty polite. Except if I am making sarcastic comments under my breath, or commenting on the snitches. This happens very rearly, but I am guessing that these are getting used as well, as oh target was disturbed and talking to themselves.

The other incident recently involved someone who was in my opinion clearly disturbed and talking to themselves, the person was much much older looking, very unkempt in appearance, and clearly not looking anything like me to any sane and rational observer, yet I passed this person talking to themselves and telling people off, I left the location where this was happening, and walked not a short distance.

Within a short space of time, I had the street theater begin. Eg. People trying to run into me, etc, they were doing things to try to provoke me. Now I was in a pretty good mood, so just ignored them. What was disturbing however was there was a woman with a baby stroller, she was deliberately oncoming in my direction, in my direct path without making any attempt to adjust where she was going, and as I adjusted, she adjusted to keep in my path, from a far away enough distance that there was no reason to that I could see, however, and this is what's disturbing, but I am reporting it, because I believe my observation on this is sound. She looked behind her to the side, and made eye contact with the cop in the car that was right near us both which I had not immediately noticed, and even though I could clearly see that she really did not want to aim her baby stroller at me, after looking behind at the car for instruction, she continued to do that, the look on her face was clear, she did not want to be doing that, she was clearly being instructed, and from what I could tell it was by whomever was in the cop car, whom I assume was observing the deliberate incident. It happened fairly quickly, yet it felt like it was in slow motion, because I had enough time to see the exchange with her and the person in the car, so all I could do after seeing this, was smile at her, and encourage her to do what she was doing, while moving out of her way, the best that I could, because she kept a direct path at me.

I was so sickened, but not for myself, I mean what kind of a society is this, where you get a young mother to pimp out her kid like that? What if I really was a dangerous and crazy person, you were willing to gamble that the brave officer sitting in the car would get to her, before an incident happened with the baby? I am not wrong in my observation of this, but shocked and disgusted. I don't know why I am disgusted. I have an idea of how the Stasi worked, I know with these community policing programs they work similar, I know people are being asked to do things like this, but when you see it like this, it's gross.

The thing is if that really had been me having a bad day, they were trying to provoke an incident. See when something is happening like crazy person talking to themselves, the snitches start to put in their little reports, so I don't know how long the crazy person had been set up and in position.

I do know that this is happening and the best thing that I can do is report what I have been observing. Now I have had the neighbours watching and leaving when I am leaving, and we have the snitch force trying to chart my way from when I leave my home, to work and back etc. Since I am clear that I don't require the babysitting, I don't appreciate it. What's interesting is that when there are people around that I know, I have never seen one of these little incidents happen, but when it's people that I do not know, suddenly these incidents happen. So I have no way of knowing how many of these incidents that I am not aware of are happening and being attributed to me.

Shy of my baby stroller incident that I reported, and handing out flyer's about a year ago, which I have also reported on these blogs, these people in my opinion are continuing to stage incidents, using the doppelgangers and the fit's the description reporting. We do not have a moral society, we have a Stasi society, and the corruption that when on there is what is happening here. I believe the incidents are in many cases staged, set up's, I believe the motivation is to portray the target as whatever they see fit, and I believe that it's also to keep these programs going, and the informant force employed. Much like a lot of the fake hate posting online are designed to keep up the appearance of a threat to society, I believe these incidents continue in the same way. Eg. Jiverly Wong was reported as a drug user who was going to rob a bank by an informant, there does not seem to have been any validity to this, but after his death, thanks to the police, these details made it into every paper across the nation.

I find that these little incidents tend to happen more when I openly talk about the fact that we have informants in the city, or identify one of their citizen informants as such. I don't know why they care, it's not like most of them are not informants anyways, I guess gangs are like that however and don't like their members identified as such.

As I pointed out before, legal action is I believe effective, but only if you can afford to do so, and second if you can find a law and lawyer that would allow you to do so. As for me, I refuse to be followed around the city like a child, the only disturbed people that I have seen are the people that have to take part in these programs, I find it very disgraceful, that citizens are being at times forced to do such things. I think it's one thing to volunteer to go along with something like this, there are enough bottom of the barrel people to go around, but what I saw and witnessed today was fear, and cohesion. The female should not have been used in the prescribed manner I described above, I think it's wrong, and again I would not take the time to report this, unless I sure the observation was correct. It's also not the first time that I have seen something similar, with citizens being coerced by cops in similar manners. To serve and protect, who's interests?

What I can tell you is that this society is what has become paranoid and disturbed, with good reason, because when you are a Stasi state, you will have people in disagreement with you, and it's sad to see something that I though was good, as something that is not. I don't view the citizens the way I once did. They are still the very polite people I once thought, but what is behind this is something that is quite scary. A Stasi society is apparently a polite society. It's also a society where activists, and dissidents are portrayed as enemies of the state and are dealt with by being made to appear as mentally disturbed.

Letting the hate all hang out.

Letting the hate all hang out.

I have been doing little things to fight back recently. The informants are still trying to mess with every aspect of my life, I find them disgraceful, I find the society disgraceful, because it allows such.

I have a client who is long over due paying some funds, but refuses to as instructed by the informant force. I have rallied back with revoking business services till payment is rendered. Now the informant force are doing everything they can to try to get me to bend on this matter. They seem to think that if they just keep messing with my life I will suddenly bend, and see things their way. Keep trying away, it just makes me more determined, I hate to watch such people triumph over others. Their actions remind me of specific cases that I have heard where they (the controlled courts) give a child to a known pedophile because the pedophile is one of theirs and the other parent was not cooperating with them, or refused to put up with abuse anymore. I have heard cases such as this, they truly are vermin and this system truly is corrupt. It's disgusting, but this system does not care about morals, it cares only about compliance and ownership of people.

Anyways I have been doing little things lately like filing complaints about every thing that they do, the same way they give us no room, we must do the same thing back to them into a corner the same way they would us. I don't mean for targets to become hate filled people, but to sit back and watch injustice day after day is a little too much for the human soul.

Yesterday I let some of that hate hang out. I have been trying to not be a hate filled person. I have been trying to do the right thing, to remember to rise above the hate, but they really deserve what they get. I can't feel sorry for them, because I realise that this is ongoing because so many people are complacent with it. Just like the abuse of children and those societies that kept it secret, and I am disgusted. Just because this system has always been like this does not mean that it should continue to be like this, and just because the silence you now keep is similar to the silence people kept about the mafia at one point, not talking about it, or denying it's existence, does not mean it has to always be like this. I realise that people have the ability to change this if they want to, but currently they are not choosing to, and that just makes me angry.

I am a pretty nice person, but how long day in day out can you watch injustice before you become truly disgusted and truly hateful? I really try to remember not to become hateful, because that's another trap that I absolutely don't want to fall into.

So yesterday I let the hate all hang out. I wrote down everything that I was feeling about the
informants and how I hoped they would pay for all the horrors they have caused. I hoped and I wished that the worst things would happen to them. I know that's just so opposite to what Christianity teaches, but I am human and they really are making themselves worthy of my despise. I wrote for like 15 minutes straight, and it felt good. I just let the hate all hang out, and it was like an enema for my soul, it just released all the bad negative, hateful things that I had been hanging on to, trying to not let myself surrender to. I let it all out and it's not mine anymore. (Well it's a work in progress. One just logged onto my computer and I just let them have it. I really do think that they are vermin, and I really don't like them, but I have to rise about it.)

I woke up this morning and I felt so much better. Yesterday I followed up my release with catching up on some of the websites, and contacting some lawyers. (Whenever I start emailing lawyers oddly enough my emails stop working, or I don't hear back.) I believe that since the ACLU has acknowledge that investigations are happening on innocent citizens, and they can go on for some time, with no one taking responsibility that targets have a better chance of using this to get legal help. See they don't like it when we get legal help, or start to try to take legal action, so I believe this is the way to go. They also do whatever they want till you smack them back. Everytime they have gotten out of line, and I have taken direct action, they have fallen back. So be it reporting them repeatedly for things I can report them for, or documenting any noise, better to record, document, then report, it's stopped. See if there is any chance that they will be caught or discovered they fall back. They are like those people who wear masks to commit their evil deeds and if they are unmasked or if there is the chance that they will be unmasked they don't like that, so you have to use what you can against them.

These people are so funny, they would be the first to pretend that they are doing something for the betterment of society, but they are the most hateful people. They say hi in the hallways, but make sure to record every move you make, and they work with those who would try to come into our homes and poison our food, or do other destructive things. (I will never forget the story of the women who found that they had messed with her child's diabetic medication.) See people are quick to target people who say things out loud. It's popular to target extremist sites or what they call hate sites, but over the last three years, I have not met anything so hateful as these people. They pull their hate crap on the down low. They pretend to be good citizens, they pretend that we have some kind of normal society, that it's not some twisted freakish mess, that harbors a creepy secret. They pretend that they are decent, but if you look at what they allow to happen to Targeted Individuals at every level of society, they are the truly hateful ones, they are just good at masking it.

I have made some peace with the fact that the world has been like this for some time, I am clear on this fact, and I don't dwell on it. This has been going on for generations, this is not new, only my awareness of it. However I refuse to be accepting of people and their complacency. I will not accept that anymore than I accept people who are complacent with letting little kids get hurt and harmed. Society is like this, because it's been allowed to be like this. Sure many would like to do something to change this, but many others are so comfortable with the way things are. They protect the system and that is why this remains. It's not because they don't know, it's because they are all too aware, and they know what can happen if they try to interfere with the system. Also many don't want to interfere, they like it, it gives vermin power they would not have in any decent functioning society.

People think it's wrong to say hateful things, and they are quick to target so called extremist sites, but I like my extremism where I can see it. I think sometimes having a place or being able to let it all hang out can be a good thing. I think in fact if we did not have places where people could let it all hang out, we might have bigger problems in society. I know for me, getting it all out helped, I feel cleansed. I think in some ways when you try to suppress people, or they feel that they can't say what they wish you potentially create more problems than you solve. I am not saying let free flowing hate go unchecked, but I am starting to realise that sometimes being open where we can see and be negative just might solve a lot more problems than they create in society. For me there is nothing more hateful and creepy right now, than the good citizens of the society who are in league with evil. They go along willingly in some cases unwilling in others with what is happening to thousands of people. It's so gross. They pretend to be good, to have some kind of morals, but it's a joke. Because they know what's happening and they go along with it to protect themselves and this system. They smile pretend to be good, but work in conjunction for evil. I finally just got disgusted, because it is hypocritical.

We lie and we pretend that our society is not doing what others have done in the past, and it's not acceptable. We like to bury our heads in the sad, enacting draconian laws about what people can say, and think, but then on an underlying hidden level, we commit all this true evil, and just because it's not open we then get to think and pretend that we are good, but we are not.

This targeting has given me some real perspective. Right now I am prayerful again. I don't want to let hate become who I am, I have come too far, but it's good to recognise this aspect, and that's why I have to focus on finding ways to overcoming such a hateful and destructive system.

I am saddened by much of what I have seen, by much of what I now understand about society and how it really functions. Yet I also know that we must retain hope. Change can happen but not if people are in denial or happy with the way that things are. Change will only happen if people understand and acknowledge that there is a problem. Till then the usual suspects will just continue to be sacrificed to the system, and much of society will go about their business with a
pretend blind eye, hoping that their turn never comes.

Crime, Cover Up, Conspiracy, Collusion.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/21/world/europe/21ireland.html?_r=1&hp=&p agewanted=print

I hate talking about these types of stories but they have to be discussed, the report says the sexual abuse of the boys was "“endemic.”

[quote]Prevalent in or peculiar to a particular locality, region, or people:[/quote]

It was happening all throughout the system.

[quote]1930s to the 1990s, when the last of the institutions closed.[/quote]

This happened for over 60 years. For 60 long years thousands of abuses and it was again kept quite, by a community, a church, a society.

[quote]It exposes for the first time the scope of the problem in Ireland, as well as how the government and the church colluded in perpetuating an abusive system. The revelations have also had the effect of stripping the Catholic Church, which once set the agenda in Ireland, of much of its moral authority and political power. [/quote]

See it was not just the church that covered this up but the government, the government that is suppose to protect it's citizens help in colluding the investigation and in covering this atrocity up. You see these scenarios time and time again. This was a society that kept this secret, and for those who did try to get it exposed, it was kept quite, time and time again, by those who were in a position of trust and authority.

[quote]Some 30,000 children were sent to such places over six decades, the report says, often against their families’ wishes and because of pressure from powerful local priests. They were sent because their families could not afford to care for them, because their mothers had committed adultery or given birth out of wedlock, or because one or both of their parents was ill, drunken or abusive. They were also sent because of petty crime, like stealing food, or because they had missed school. [/quote]

Again we see a target population of the poor and the powerless, who could ill afford to go up against the church.

[quote]“Punching, flogging, assault and bodily attacks, hitting with the hand, kicking, ear pulling, hair pulling, head shaving, beating on the soles of the feet, burning, scalding, stabbing, severe beatings with or without clothes, being made to kneel and stand in fixed positions for lengthy periods, made to sleep outside overnight, being forced into cold or excessively hot baths and showers, hosed down with cold water before being beaten, beaten while hanging from hooks on the wall, being set upon by dogs, being restrained in order to be beaten, physical assaults by more than one person, and having objects thrown at them.”

Some of the schools operated essentially as workhouses. In one school, Goldenbridge, girls as young as 7 spent hours a day making rosaries by stringing beads onto lengths of wire. They were given quotas: 600 beads on weekdays and 900 on Sundays.

Girls were routinely sexually abused, often by more than one person at a time, the report said, in “dormitories, schools, motor vehicles, bathrooms, staff bedrooms, churches, sacristies, fields, parlors, the residences of clergy, holiday locations and while with godparents and employers.” [/quote]

Thousands of innocent children at the hands of these animals, these abusers. The worst part is you see these patterns repeating themselves, not just in Ireland, or even just the Catholic Church.

[quote]“While horrific, widespread reports of abuse and cover-up are sadly quite common, the significance here is that a government panel is conclusively saying that the finger-pointing and blame-shifting and excuse-making of the church hierarchy is bogus,” he said in an interview.
The commission was formed in 2000, after an explosive series of radio programs and documentaries in the 1990s began exposing a terrible secret that had been kept by an entire society: the details of what went on in the children’s homes. In 1999, Bertie Ahern, then the prime minister, issued a blanket apology to the victims of the abuse. [/quote]

Exposing the terrible secret that had been kept by an entire society. See societies can keep secrets, and in this case the secret affected it's most pure, it's most vulnerable, but they still kept the secret and protected the system.

The creepy part as usual is you have the public outrage, you have the investigation into this, which I don't think had any choice but to find the church guilty, but you also have what I see consistently, the church and the perpetrators getting off scott free. There names were protected because the church, which is just oh so sorry for what happened to the children, sued the state to protect the names and identities of the abusers. Many of them will never pay for what they did to these children.

[quote]“The report is significant in that it provides a detailed anatomy of how the abuse occurred and the institutions in which it occurred,” he said in an interview. “The problem is that you spend almost 10 years and who knows how much money, and you never get to the point of saying who was responsible.” [/quote]

If the other pattern that I am use to seeing is consistent, it will also mean that over the 60 year time period, many of these men will have moved into top positions of power, because this is also a constant pattern with abusers, they don't pay for their crimes, they move into increasingly greater positions of power, and thus they can cover up the crimes and protect themselves and their fellow abusers. It's a consistent pattern.

This is why many things that we might call conspiracy do not come out, it is often not just the people doing the abuses that are keeping quite, but it is those around them who are aware of the abuses but who do nothing and continue to protect the system. If these people will keep this type of secret, which violated the innocent, and protected a system that was instrumental in their degradations and violations, then can we expect anymore from society when it comes to being targets of Gang Stalking or other forms of government torture and harassment?

Jiverly Wong. Two sides.

I have got a theory so let's put it to the test.

This should be obvious, but I am sure it will not be.

Part of what Jiverly Wong said is that people were spreading rumours about him, specifically the cops. After his death there were stories printed about him that he was crack/cocaine drug addicted loser, I have yet to find anything to say that this was true. There was also this story that said he was a failed loser who planned to rob a bank. Where did these rumour come from?

From the general population? I don't think so. The rumour about him wanting to rob a bank was given to the police by an informant. This rumour came from an informant, an informant who feed the rumour to the cops, so if the cops are not spreading rumours about him, how did this rumour find it's way into the papers? Aren't these informant tips suppose to be secret? Yet after his death, the man who says that the cops were spreading rumours about him, has a story printed saying he was addicted to cocaine, and had planned to rob a bank. Seems like even in death, he might be proving himself correct.

This was a tip from 1999, 10 years ago, so how did it have this long a shelf life if nothing ever came of it? How did it find it's way into several articles?

Also the rumours about him having a girlfriend, and previously a wife, I have yet to have this stuff fully confirmed, the parents don't know anything about either.

Based on the article below, I would say that there was rumour floating around about him, a rumour that came from an informant years ago, but would make it's way into the papers after his death? Sounds to me like this rumour might have been floating around, and if so, this rumour could only have come from the cops, who the informant gave the tip to, and this would prove a part of what Jiverly Wong was saying.

Also he was laid off from his job, not fired, but any paper could make that mistake. Ofcourse if they were taking time to check the story, and not just print rumour and hearsay that would paint the guy as a nut job, they also might have noticed this little error.

I still want to know more about this wife, the parents are just finding out about it in the papers, and why has she not been contacted, were the records they found correct? Did they find records for someone else named Jiverly Wong, in their quick fact checking?

The article below really tried to portray him in the worst light possible, with a lot of misinformation, information which I have not in some ways been able to verify. What is more certain however is that the information about the drug addiction and bank heist rumour most likely came from the police, and if this was a 1999 rumour why was it still floating around, unless what he said in his letter had some validity?

Anyways here is the article.

[quote]http://www.nypost.com/seven/04052009/news/nationalnews/failed_life_for_killer_coward_162952.htm
FAILED LIFE FOR KILLER 'COWARD'
* DIVORCED & LOST JOB BEFORE MASSACRE* CO-WORKER WORRIED 'HE'D SHOOT US ALL'
By LORENA MONGELLI in Binghamton and TODD VENEZIA and JAMES FANELLI in New York City
The lunatic behind the Binghamton massacre was a pathetic, gun-loving coward who got divorced, lost his job and was driven to depression because he could barely speak English after many years in the United States, officials and people who knew him said yesterday.
His life in the pits, Jiverly Wong, 41, became a regular at Gander Mountain, a sporting goods store, in the six months leading up to the rampage, buying and returning as many as six guns after firing each a few times.
Wong -- who has a daughter in California, according to a coworker -- would get agitated when staffers had trouble with his broken English.
"He would get frustrated," Dave Henderson, who taught a class at the store, told the Press & Sun Bulletin of Binghamton. "There was times I wouldn't even talk to him anymore."
It was not clear if that was where he bought the two guns found on his body after Friday's massacre: 9mm and .45-caliber pistols.
His former co-workers at the ShopVac vacuum-cleaner assembly facility were equally frustrated by his communication problems, and were worried about his gun-loving ways.
On Mondays, when asked about his weekends, Wong routinely replied, "I went to a shooting range," said ex-colleague David Carrico, 18.
"He liked shooting guns. I was worried he would come into work one day, get angry and shoot us all."
It wasn't until five months after his November firing from ShopVac that he finally did snap -- but he directed his rage elsewhere, at the language school from which he essentially flunked out.
Wong on Friday picked up a pair of guns, hoisted a bulging sack of ammunition and marched maniacally into the American Civic Association, killing 13 people before turning the gun on himself. Another four victims remain hospitalized, but are expected to survive.
A clearer picture emerged yesterday of Wong's tale of woe before his grisly end.
The last 10 years of his sorry life included cocaine addiction, a bank-heist plan that never came to fruition, a divorce and lost jobs in New York and California.
Wong -- who at one point changed his last name to Voong, and also sometimes went by the name Linh -- was born in Vietnam to an ethnic Chinese family.
He came to the United States in the early 1990s with his family and became a naturalized citizen.
Wong quickly wound up in trouble, as court records in Los Angeles show that he was charged with forgery in 1992. It's not clear what became of the case. His family finally settled in Binghamton.
He got a gun permit in the mid-1990s.
New York officials investigated him in 1999 after an informant said that he was planning to rob a bank and had a "crack or cocaine" habit, Binghamton Police Chief Joseph Zikuski said. Nothing came of the allegations.
A couple of years later, Wong left for California, where he got a job driving a delivery truck for Kikka Sushi and lived in a cheap Inglewood motel. At the fleabag pay-by-the-month joint -- near the airport with bars on the windows -- all he had in his room was a bed and a 52-inch TV, fellow tenant Eric Sherman told The Post.
"All he would do is sit inside his apartment and chain-smoke," he said. "He didn't talk much and I just thought he didn't talk because he didn't really speak English."
Los Angeles court records also show that Wong was married. He was divorced in July 2005.
That was quickly followed by his abrupt departure from Kikka Sushi -- and the West Coast altogether.
Wong complained he was disgruntled at the company, where he made $500 per week.
Back in Binghamton, Wong was able to hold down a steady job at ShopVac until he was laid off, but was again upset over his low pay.
"I work so hard, but they only pay me $8 an hour," he complained to colleague Donald Ackley.
He was also tormented by some coworkers and sat alone in the lunchroom.
"Sometimes they picked on him a little bit," he said. "They would say, 'It's wrong, it's Wong, it's wrong, it's Wong.' "
Depressed and angry, he tried to better himself in the area where he was most vulnerable: his lack of English skills. He enrolled in an intermediate-level class at the association.
But once again he failed by hardly bothering to show up.
"His attendance was so erratic, he was dropped," said Elisabeth Hayes, his English teacher, who was out on vacation on the day of the massacre. Her substitute, Roberta King, 72, wound up dead.
"This was a nasty act of irrationality. Why did he have to do that?" Hayes asked. "We could have been there for him if he needed support. The class was kind to him.
"It's a true American nightmare."
In his final months, Wong -- who wore a hearing aid, according to driving records -- was miserable, surviving on $200 in unemployment benefits and living in his parents' gritty home.
By the time he was ready to commit his cold-blooded crime, the only place he found solace was at a gym, a pal said.
"He seemed a little depressed," said Son Quach, a grocery-store owner who had worked out with him at the Court Jester gym in nearby Johnson City.
He also griped about a recent break-up with his girlfriend, but would not elaborate.
Wong was inconsolable and often whined about his "bad luck."
"We picked up that apparently people were making fun of him and he felt that he was being degraded because of his inability to speak English and he was upset about that," Zikuski said.
The police chief said Wong's suicide was his final act of failure.
Police believe Wong planned to go out in a blaze of glory in a gunfight with cops, but got cold feet when he heard sirens and put a bullet between his eyes.
"He must have been a coward," Zikuski said.
"We speculate that when he heard the sirens, he decided to end his own life. He was heavily armed, had a lot of ammunition on him and, thank God, before more lives were lost, that he decided to do that."
Additional reporting by Tori Richards in Los Angeles, Josh Williams and Brad Hamilton in Binghamton and AP
lorena.mongelli@nypost.com[/quote]
If he survived 18 years of being Gang Stalked, and if he is telling the truth, then he was not a coward for those 18 years, it take a lot to survive being under investigation 24/7. Apparently the alligation of drug addition might be false and this might be the rumours that he spoke about, sounds like there was the typical workplace mobbing involved, and the community Gang Stalking, which might be part of the reason he dropped out of the language school. See if you take the time to listen to his side, you can either write him off as some paranoid whack job, or if you look deeper, he might have been burtally targeted and harassed for 18 years and if this is the case, more needs to be done to bring this to the light.

How do they do it?

How did they do it? This is what I am wondering how did they live with the hypocrisy of it all? While the west was busy insulting countries like East Germany for their snitches and informants they were doing the same thing.

This system is not a new thing, we saw an increase of this recently in some of our lives, but just reading about the John Lennon files and and many others I ask the question, how did they live with the hypocrisy of it all?

They had citizen informants while the Stasi had theirs, they were conducting widescale investigations, and this has been ongoing for some time, yet we use to really look down on countries like that. Our country is not like that, we don't do those things. It's like the time those tv evangelist got caught with their pants down.

It's the most irritating thing, knowing what I now know. So I just had to ask that question. How did they do it?

I am revising my earlier statement, though many are a part of the informant system, some do not understand the bigger picture that is ongoing. Eg. They are asked to take part in the operation, but maybe believe that it's just observation of an individual and have no idea of the wider plague that's happening. I wouldn't even know where to begin. How do you tell these people the full scope of what you are aware of, and what they are a part of? It feels so wrong to make them aware. In some ways I would like to leave them in their innocence, but then they will just have this wave wash over them and they won't know what hit them. It's six of one, half dozen of the other.

A couple of fun things we can do to mess with them. They use a lot of disinformation with us, so I find that turn around is fair play and it works really well, so use at your own discretion, and use it wisely.

They need time to set up their operation. Eg. Whenever I go someplace really unexpectedly, or do something unexpected, you can tell that it takes them time to get their informants into play, and get the game going. They are not as slick as they seem. Don't get me wrong, they will be everywhere, but they are not as slick as they think they are.

Eg. I related the story back before I knew what was ongoing. I had called for school in the U.S. and had spoken to a Cathy several times, I was really familiar with her, then I had decided to look at some Canadian school's, and called, well I spoke to a Cathy, got all my information from Cathy, and as I got off the phone, I realised it was Cathy. The same Cathy that I had been speaking to. Now this was before I knew about Gang Stalking, but at that stage, I knew there was something seriously wrong. Later I would find out that Cathy or Kathy or whatever is or was a common name they would use.

The targets if they arrived at a place and were looking for a target, would also use specific names to pass on the fact they were looking for a specific person. So phone calls, unknown online communications, all surveillance. Expect that if you are communicating with someone who is not an informant today, these people will go behind your back, and make contact with them if they can, and manipulate the situations.

They did this when I owned a business. Contacted all my customers behind my back. One client introduced another client to me, named Cathy, at the time I was really unaware, but that should give you some idea. They tried to get my clients to leave, or introduce people to cause stress to my company. Lot's of little things i would find out later on. That they had done and been doing for years, before I became aware. They truly are parasitic.

So how can you get at them? How can you win? Well I was thinking about this, and the slaves of the system, the aware that know what is going on, you probably stand a better chance of destroying them internally than most of us, externals. I mean you have the chance to learn and know more about how they operate, if they are chipping you, and others like you. The way the communication system works, the little commands you get from the earphones. You can chip away at this. I don't know that the way to win or even fight this is outright rebellion, but I think if you slowly chip away at it, this might be the way to go.

I am not sure what that means yet fully, but that was the answer that came to me. I have been thinking about this a lot. You have to understand, these people will go out of their way to do just about anything to get to the target. Mess up construction projects that go months at a time. Moving into buildings, contacting all your customers, and if you are working with other, your business partners. Etc. They will try to be in control of every aspect of your life.

Eg. When I use to have the phone available with more easy access, they would have a variety of people call, but it would be at such specific times, that you knew it was on behalf of them, that constant need to make contact with the target. If you are not under observation it's hard to understand this.

That seems to be the best solution. The ones that are inside, you need to find ways to chip away at it. Like a piece of rock. Doesn't have to be big chunks, just little things over time. Eventually the rock will crumple. See this is what they use on us, but I have been thinking about it, and the same method, should work on them. I am just not sure what this truly means yet, but that's the answer that came to me.

Anyways, so that was my question. How do they do it? How do they still criticize countries like China, and how could they have criticized countries like East Germany, when the same stuff was ongoing here, and in greater capacity?

Anyways it's something to think about.

Welcome to our worlds

After reading this article, it's like all the pain and all the trauma of the last two years, just comes back.

Being in your home and being burnt for hours on end, and not knowing what was happening, or being able to do anything about it at first. Then realising that your fellow human beings were partaking in this, and were psychotically enjoying what was happening.

Trying to write to organizations such as Amnesty and others to get help, trying to other responsible agencies, not at first realising that you were the testing ground for something that was yet to come.

Being unable to prove in many cases what was happening, having only the word of other targets to back each other up, on what was being done to us, the violations that we were experiencing, that for the most part just went unheard, trying to explain to you the general public that these weapons existed and would someday be used on you. People just dismissing the idea as crazy without doing any research or investigation.

That someday might be closer than you think.

These things should not be used on anyone, in any capacity whatsoever. These things, these none lethal weapons are cruelty and they are torturous, and they should not be used on anyone. Of course as I have already documented, permission was granted to use the none portable kind on the people of Iraq over a year ago, and there have been horrible reports of bodies, burnt on the inside out.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2005-07-24-nonlethal-weapons_x.htm

The portable kind in small doses no doubt would be ok, but that will not be what happens. Just like with tasers they will be over used, and abused. The animals that were capable of remotely torturing myself and other Targeted Individuals for hours at a time, days at a time, months at a time, years at a time, will have no problem doing so to others.

The general public will just have to try to learn how to shield like many Targeted Individuals have had to learn to do.

Anyways it's just a brief article, but it just reminded me of so much of what's happened over the last two years.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16339-us-police-could-get-pain-beam-weapons.html

US police could get 'pain beam' weapons

[quote]The research arm of the US Department of Justice is working on two portable non-lethal weapons that inflict pain from a distance using beams of laser light or microwaves, with the intention of putting them into the hands of police to subdue suspects.
The two devices under development by the civilian National Institute of Justice both build on knowledge gained from the Pentagon's controversial Active Denial System (ADS) - first demonstrated in public last year, which uses a 2-metre beam of short microwaves to heat up the outer layer of a person's skin and cause pain.

'Reduced injuries'

Like the ADS, the new portable devices will also heat the skin, but will have beams only a few centimetres across. They are designed to elicit what the Pentagon calls a "repel response" - a strong urge to escape from the beam.

A spokesperson for the National Institute for Justice likens the effect of the new devices to that of "blunt trauma" weapons such as rubber bullets, "But unlike blunt trauma devices, the injury should not be present. This research is looking to reduce the injuries to suspects," they say.[/quote]