What is electronic harassment?

Non-lethal weapons is a broad category which includes devices for beaming various kinds of energy at human targets in order to temporarily incapacitate them, or to control or affect their behavior. -Source (Eharassment.ca)

Electronic harassment with EMF is using electromagnetic weaponry to hurt or torture another person. These weapons emit beams or rays of electromagnetic energy and can seriously cause mild to debilitating damage depending on exposure, and the frequency the beam is set to.

The first article below which came out in July 10, 2005. discusses there future usage on the civilian population. However what it does not mention, and what many people are not aware of is that these weapons have been sold on the Internet for some time now, and can readily be purchased, assembled, and used against unsuspecting targets. Adults, children, animals, anything that's living that someone wants to torture, hurt or bend to their wills.

http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,68152,00.html
http://www.bugsweeps.com/info/electronic_harassment.htmlhttp://www.plans-kits.com/kits.htmlhttp://www.eharassment.ca/
http://www.eharassment.ca/guestbook.html
http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/st...1887256,00.html

The symptom associated with it's uses include heating of the body, which makes your skin feel like it's on fire, or burning.

Wave vibrations which make it hard to sleep or rest. not visible to the naked eye.

Long term exposure can cause cancer, and other dangerous conditions.

Affected immune systems.

Head aches


These weapons have been banned in three American States, including Michigan.
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/20...03-HNB-4513.pdf

In Canada I am not aware that they have been banned in any Province yet.

Amnesty International is aware of them, but they have not yet taken a stance, which I can only hope that they will do soon, because these are worst than tasers, which they have taken a stance on.

To give you an idea of what happens with these weapons here is an excerpt from the wired.com article.

[The hallmark of all directed-energy weapons is that the target -- whether a human or a mechanical object -- has no chance to avoid the shot because it moves at the speed of light. At some frequencies, it can penetrate walls.]

[Among the simplest forms are inexpensive, handheld lasers that fill people's field of vision, inducing a temporary blindness to ensure they stop at a checkpoint, for example. Some of these already are used in Iraq. Other radio-frequency weapons in development can sabotage the electronics of landmines, shoulder-fired missiles or automobiles -- a prospect that interests police departments as well as the military.

A separate branch of directed-energy research involves bigger, badder beams: lasers that could obliterate targets tens of miles away from ships or planes. Such a strike would be so precise that, as some designers put it at a recent conference here, the military could plausibly deny responsibility. The flexibility of directed-energy weapons could be vital as wide-scale, force-on-force conflict becomes increasingly rare, many experts say. But the technology has been slowed by such practical concerns as how to shrink beam-firing antennas and power supplies. ]

[Military officials also say more needs to be done to assure the international community that directed-energy weapons set to stun rather than kill will not harm noncombatants.][Such issues recently led the Pentagon to delay its Project Sheriff, a plan to outfit vehicles in Iraq with a combination of lethal and nonlethal weaponry -- including a highly touted microwave-energy blaster that makes targets feel as if their skin is on fire. Sheriff has been pushed at least to 2006.]


Many times people feel that there is little that they can do to avert a tragedy, or to make a change. These weapons are harmful and potentially dangerous. Though they do seem to have some good applications, they have just as many if not more potentially harmful ones. T

hese can be dispersed and used against anyone. Eg. It could be used against a crowd in the States protesting the recent bill that takes away many of their rights is one example. (If they decided to protest.)
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906J.shtml

These could in future be used against people protesting cuts to health care, and other essential services.If you are concerned about the use of these weapons or have just recently become aware it might be a good idea to write to Amnesty International or your local MP's, or Senators to let them know that you disapprove of the usage of these weapons.

Today they are actively being used to harass targets of gang stalking including myself, tomorrow they could be used quite legally to harass activist, dissidents or anyone who fails to agree with the government or the corporations.

These weapons have the potential to do a great deal of harm, and they are available where anyone can get their hands on them. I would ask that you consider taking a stance, before these are used to take away your ability to take a stance.