Mark vs MarX

Mark vs MarX.

Ok since getting back online. I have had the pleasure and the dismay of reading and viewing some youtube stuff.

As usual I continue to be very impress by Mark M. Rich and his research. It he ever turns out to not be a real target, I will be really bummed out. Anyways, his research is impressive and if you have not had the chance to do so, might I suggest you read his latest article, a camp for every belief.

http://thehiddenevil.com/article04.asp

He breaks down the top beliefs about what is happening and he also states why the belief does or does not hold weight. Here are some excepts from his latest article.

[quote]One of the primary defense mechanisms which the Hidden Evil is equipped with, is one which prevents people from learning who is responsible for it. When I mention responsible parties here, I'm not referring to the people visibly carrying out the harassment, but its origin. In this regard, if you're able to narrow down the scope of suspects to a few organizations which are likely responsible, then they have lost one of their most valuable assets: concealment.

There are many sites & forums that have sprung up on the Internet which are sponsoring a variety of explanations regarding who is behind this global program of terror.(*) Some blatantly or subtly promote the explanations which follow. All of these groups seem to recognize that government experimentation & Cointelpro operations did occur. And some members of these groups may think that the program still exists primarily for experimentation. But for the most part this article will focus on the "who" rather than the "why." Camps which promote beliefs which are obviously ridiculous will not be covered.[/quote]

He goes on to question and nicely get's rid of the vigilante extremist explanation. He then tackles the possibility that it's just technology that has gotten into the wrong hands, and again nicely get's rid of that theory. The last two theories, full government support and the New World Order theory are nicely discussed and the finger is pointed in that direction more than any other. He then summarizes it with a nice conclusion. Even if you don't choose to believe him, it's well researched, nicely put together and it was a refreshing read to come back home online to.

The next Mark that I want to tackle is MarXMinD from youtube fame. I liked this guy's music video, but his last couple of video postings have me scratching my head and really wondering about him. Now I don't like to post anything that seems like a public attack on someone I don't really know. So I will leave it at that.

Anyways his videos asks targets to stop blaming the government, and they almost make it seem like it's our fault that we are getting attacked like this. I just sat there with my mouth open in absolute shock. Like who's side are you on? (I have my opinion which I will keep to myself.)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Bh8GObswXY0
http://youtube.com/watch?v=PNdw3P9TJ8Q

Anyways I was not going to post the videos, because I don't want to feed the pigeons, but everyone is entitled to their own opinions and I just really wanted to draw attention to the contrast of how a well researched piece comes off and does give credibility, vs something that I felt that did not.

Needless to say, I am not going to play the game. I am just going to stick to postings and people that I think move the cause in a positive direction. I really can't comment on motivation, cause I really don't know, maybe this person really felt that this was the case, or maybe he really does have an agenda. Either way, I really want to highlight the positive job that I feel that Mark M. Rich is doing, and would encourage targets towards well researched and well written pieces such as that.