How do we stop Gang Stalking?

So people keep asking what we can do to stop Gang Stalking?

I was on a forum recently and one person told people they could stop Gang Stalking by moving to the heart of the forest, and destroying their cellphone. Sure if you wish to disconnect from society, live off the scraps of the forest, and leave your stuff behind when you move this might just work, but otherwise, most targets need real solutions as they go through months, and then years of being systemically destroyed.

Now these people are stalking a lot of us because they deem us, or believe us to be mentally ill, on drugs, perverts, whatever. For those being listed as mentally ill, you would think that the logical thing to do would be to get a mental health examination, but from the articles pertaining to the psychiatric reprisal, we learn that psychiatrists are all too willing to list innocent, sane people as mentally ill, thus getting an examination will not necessarily clear you.

What we could do is get out own team, eg. A threat assessment team, to review decisions that have been made by others. Eg. In the Jane Clift case if there was a none bias committee she could have appealed to, to see if her listing was justified, it could have saved her four years of legal trouble, and having to leave her community.

The problem many of us have is that we have never seen our community files, we don't know the information that has been listed. I do know there is a lot of false information in mine, just on things that I have observed, that these people believe to be true. I do know they have falsely listed me as having some sort of a mental illness, because I dared to take some company to task for harassment. The problem is having open access to files, and a none partial party that is willing to listen, and understand that these files have a lot of false information. Staged incidents, incidents that do not even involve the target, like Jiverly Wong did, but the lies do not seem to matter, it's just what people are willing to believe.

The other solution of course is there are villages for the mentally ill. Those who are homeless might be able to take advantage of these communities that are springing up, again the problem with this is that many targets though falsely listed as mentally ill, are not mentally ill. When you are desperate however, this could be a temporary safe harbour, but ofcourse this is what they want. Targets housed together so they can "keep an eye on the mentally ill."

The best solution would be to get the laws changed, thus targets who are listed, must be informed that they have been added to the registry, they must be informed for what they have been added, thus they have a legal right to pursue action, and to ensure the information listed on their files is not one sided. I think this is the best solution, but could take years to implement.

Now there are groups who have caught the eye of politicians, surely that will help? To be honest you can have a thousand groups, with the eye of a thousand politicians and that will not help if they are misleading and looking at false precepts, or stalking gangs, etc. I have yet to hear any of these groups address the occupational health and safety laws, and the mental health laws that are being used to list targets, till this silence is broken, and addressed, these groups could do a thousand campaigns, but it it's not the right one, it will just waste the time, energy and resources that targets don't have to waste.

At the end of the day, exposure and awareness is still the key. Four years ago, I had to fight to keep my threads on forums, they would get deleted, my accounts banned, the threads would get disrupted by fake targets, and then get closed. Any time head way was being made, they would block it, just to protect this system.

Things have changed somewhat. The conspiracy sites, and some extremist sites are now fully aware of what Gang Stalking is. Gang Stalking is slowly making it's way into some of the more mainstream forums. There are still those who try to dismiss it off hand as an urban legand, or a sign of mental illness, but there are others who discuss it openly, and in some ways it's getting normalized. The idea is to get the normalization to occur much more rapidly, while keeping the topic relevant. Eg. Mobbing is exposed, but someday's I am not sure this makes any difference to the targets of mobbing. There is little point in getting this normalized to the stage where it becomes irrelevant. Eg. Priests molesting children had it's shock value, but today stories of this do not cause the same outrage, even though it still happening to a large degree. It's become normalized, but not as relevant as it once was.

So moving forward, targets are the best for exposing this, if we stay on targeted forums, and don't mingle with others, the information will not get out. The idea is to mingle, share information, but share good information. The term Gang Stalking is the term I use. Most targets after trying the organized stalking term, seem to switch back in a lot of cases to Gang Stalking. It's just the most popular term. I think Organized Gang Stalking is also ok, but use what suites you the best, I don't care what term people use, as long as the correct concept is conveyed, and what is behind this is conveyed.

How the system is working

This is a brief summary for targets still trying to grasp what might have happened and how their lives wound up in this place. Using some of these occupational health and safety/mental health laws, to the best of my knowledge workplaces, civil officials and others, can have a another official, deem a person as a danger to themselves or others. In more severe cases they might even go so far as to try to list you as gravely disabled, as they did with Britney Spears.

They can do this all behind your back. Health officials can declare you a danger to yourself, others, suffering from a mental illness, or even gravely disabled, based on the information provided to them by a third party. The third party does not even have to be the one initiating the complaint. However if you are fully functioning, they would have a hard time committing you, as we saw with the Lindsay Lohan case, who did not meet the criteria for a 5150 hold, but they apparently did suggest it. I think since she has obtained a lawyer, they have not been so bold to try this again.

Here is an example of such a senario. Eg. A employer wants to get rid of an employee who has been consistently complaining, they suggest they see a company paid psychiatrist.

http://www.harassment101.com/Article5.html

Under existing laws in some countries, states, etc. They can suggest but can not force a person to. What they can do however is add a lot of stuff to your file. They might even use evidence from the very individuals that you are making the complaint against, making it look as if you are the problem. This has been well documented by the mobbing community so I don't think that I have to re-document this.

Once they bring your file often to one of their company paid psychiatrists, community health and safety review boards, university threat assessment teams, etc, they can then list you as a danger, or suffering from a mental illness. They can do that based on the criteria that says you are unable to function cause you are mentally impaired on how you are perceiving the things around you, or showing a degradation.

Once they list you as mentally ill, a danger to yourself or others, you are then placed on the lists. These lists act the same way the pedophile lists act. If you are walking through a community, the phone rings they get a call, dangerous, or mentally ill person in the area. Remember in many cases, you will not be aware of the drastic steps your employer, spouse, parent, civil authority, or others has taken. The only thing you will be aware of is the sudden harassment and community surveillance. As we have seen, when you try to complain about it and report it, they use this to say that you are suffering from a mental illness. The reality is the target is being systemically harassed and destroyed. This is being used as a means of retaliation by employers, civil workers in the community and others.

So those around you get contacted, told not to say anything, and ofcourse the useful idiots around you assume that it's true, most act accordingly, which just makes your situation worst. You can then add in the fact that you might still be experiencing the original situation of harassment that you were in, when you made the complaint, this was the situation with the Damon Thompson case. Then any further attempts you make to get help or assistance for legitimate harasment that might still be happening, and which is likely to have escalated, is just viewed as further signs of your mental degredation.

In the Damon Thompson case, he did end up lashing out. This is then used to show that the diagnosis was correct, but the reality is much like workplace mobbing targets who lash out, there is more to the story. The reality is that listing an innocent person as mentally ill, is likely to be a catch 22, or self fulfilling prophecy. The listing ensures that the harassment gets multiplied, and thus often brings about more severe outcomes.

The listings of course cause the community to go into overdrive. Oh no a mentally ill person amongst us, we can't have that, and they do perform the harassment behaviours that targets have listed. Remember they will use all the tactics that they would use against pedophiles against targets, and then some, but what has been documented is a deliberate campaign of harassment. Organized, orchestrated, including gaslighting, subtle harassment. They do it, cause they think that you are mentally ill, no one will believe you, and as targets have documented, the police don't help, doctors, etc. They all use the listing to assume that you are mentally ill. Remember suggesting that there is a conspiracy against you, or that you are being tortured is a sign of mental illness, but the problem is that when someone goes behind your back, lists you as a danger to yourself, and others, or lists you as mentally ill, and tells everyone else but you, that is a conspiracy. Also when these citizen informants in the course of their monitoring use things like wicked lasers, or remote electronic monitoring devices to
surveil the target, and it harms the target, the target is fully correct in saying that they are being tortured. In both cases, this is what is happening with many targets, so under these circumstances the target is fully correct.

Again in most cases, you will likely have been wrongly assessed by some company shrill, salivating to do their masters bidding, or some equally panting community shrill. Maybe I am being harsh, and maybe some of these people really do make the only judgement that they can based on the lies that they are told. But when you are assessing someone based on one side of a story, that side being an employer, maybe family member with ulterior motives, civil employee, or other, there has to be more to go on before destroying someones life, but there is not.

Once you are listed and those around you are notified, most take advantage of the situation, any little conflict, they use it to paint you as a danger. Even where they is no conflict, we see stories getting made up, deliberate set up's, eg. Mentally ill looking individuals being in the same location where the target is, so that your oh so kind community members can call it in. Now remember the average person is told there is a mentally ill person in the area, sometimes they are given a description, sometimes it just vague. So they will look around for anything that looks crazy and report it. Behind the scenes, there is a deliberate effort happening, to ensure that such people are in locations where the target is, so that the reports can keep coming, remember at this stage there is a bit of funding that goes into this, and the more mentally ill people the better. Also they don't want it to come out that they are doing what they did in Russia, which is listing perfectly sane and healthy people as mentally ill, thus it's in their best interests to use the useful idiots around you to carry out their bidding.

Again calling people useful idiots is harsh. They are often lied to. They see information and are given information that looks real, they are in many cases lied to and most people are simple, basic, they can not understand or conceive of the type of conspiracy being used against targets, or believe that the state would go through so much effort for one person. What people have to understand is that this is not so much effort for one person. This is a system. A system that is already in place with these types of resources, so that one person is like an ant colony dealing with an errant fly, that get's into it's path. The network is already in place, already set up in each community, all they have to do is point, click, tell the people whom to hate, and they do it. It's no more expensive to get rid of one person than it is 20 if the network is already in place.

So you have the situation that most targets wake up to find themselves in. Being hunted, targeted, and having no idea why. You have those around the target that have been advised of their mental illness, danger to society, status, and the society goes on this. You have the target realising that their is a conspiracy, and the community thinking the person is having a breakdown and "doing everything to see that the target gets the help that they need." A beautiful little symphony that usually results in the destruction of the target, by the malicious, or well meaning useful idiots around them.

The laws that are being used. Occupational Health and Safety, Workplace Violence Prevention, Mental health acts are where I am looking. This often starts in the community, work, school, etc, but once remotely evaluated, this goes into a couple of other areas. Mental health act laws, cause those in some cases are what are used, in other cases, it's occupational health and safety laws, depends on the situation. The distribution of information, to the wide and varied world falls under the privacy laws, and what the rights of the individual are vs, the community at large. Eg. Though you might have the right to alert those around a target that they are in immediate contact with, do you really have the right to alert someone in bora, bora, whom they will never have any physical contact with, but are doing business with? No, but they are using this to systemically poison the lives of targets. Using it to harass them online, to disrupt business dealings and associations, to systemically blacklist and blackball innocent people.

Civil action. This is where we might be able to sue, under civil laws, if the information that has been supplied is false, information leading to you further being listed as mentally ill, dangerous. If targets can then access Freedom Of Information files, there are records kept of complaints, then they can try to use this to sue for any false or inaccurate information. If anyone has made a false statement or testimony deliberately, then this is the clause that would allow you to sue. This seems to work for America, Canada, and there is a U.K. clause. I think the U.K. clause works for most of Europe and Australia's laws should be similar to laws governing the U.K.

So in getting proper assistance, you might want to ask for a lawyer that is skilled in privacy laws, labor laws, and mental health laws. Jane Clift was lucky, and targets have to be equally lucky to get the right assistance, or you will just be bounced around. Add to that that some lawyers are bound by the confidentiality of the program and might have a conflict of interest in discussing some of this information, and there you have it Bob's your uncle, more or less a basic set up to this system. I am not a lawyer, but from what I have been able to gleam with my many hours of research, this should be a ruff idea of how this is working.