Dream Review

Dream Review

Ok I had some time to go over my dream that I had the other day. Upon review a few things came to me.

The dream was in white space except for one object in the room. Eg. I guess we could call it like a “white room”. One person and myself and nothing else.

Before this I mentioned that there were elements of the dream that were missing, and in my dream who ever was experimenting had figured out why I was not accepting the previous dreams. This one I had previously accepted without question, but I think I was wrong.

Upon reflection I think the dream was actually similar to the white room that people describe being experimented on when they very falsely believe that they have been kidnapped by aliens or whatever.

Hear me out. I am not knocking extra terrestrial life, I am sure that in this vast universe other life forms could exist. Could some people have made contact, sure anything is possible, but this is what I have come to believe.

I believe that most of these so called alien encounters have been government kidnappings period. Either real physical kidnappings or done remotely at an astral level. I don’t believe that they have been alien encounters at all. Again I am not saying that extra terrestrials could not exist, but I just don’t believe that many of these encounters have been that at all.

In the dream when I reflected I got a sense that the room had been used to experiment on people, to fool them that they were being experimented on by other worldly beings. It was a strong impression, that I got when I reflected on the dream later. The strong impression was that instead of the one object that I did see in the dream, that normally the room would have had a table, and it was used for experimenting and that the people were fooled. The faces they see are images implanted, to hide real life creeps who do sick experiments. That was the very strong dream impression I got. Remember dreams are very informative, dreams were how someone figured out the double helix, dreams can tell us a lot.

If you go to this site, http://in2worlds.net/ Conti gives a lot of good information and insight about alien encounters about what she thinks might be happening. After visiting her site some years ago, I wrote about what I believed was happening in her community, but these dreams seem to be very insightful and I think they may explain some of these encounters.

http://www.lulu.com/content/373169
http://in2worlds.net/ChasingPhantoms.pdf

The interesting thing about Conti is that she is a Gang Stalking target and abductee. Yes that sounds weird, but her research is pretty solid, and in her community, they get electronic harassment. It’s the first time that I had come across another community that get’s electronic harassment. They get the black helicopters. Followed around etc. I have not figured out how a threat assessment list could be working in her case, but for some reason it seems some just get straight up Gang Stalking, some get electronic harassment, then some get experimented on and I believe tricked and it branches off into things like this, but it’s all branches of the same octopus.

I think these alien encounters are false, and people are getting images implanted into there heads via the remote neural monitoring.


http://gangstalkingworld.com/john-st-clair-akwei-vs-nasa/

[quote]Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can send images direct to the visual cortex, bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject’s brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes.[/quote]

The images are being implanted to mask experiments that are being done at either an astral level, meaning you never leave the room with your physical body, but your astral body is experimented on. The dreams and the flash backs would be very real, some people I suspect would have a hard time distinguishing the two if they were not aware of astral projection or astral dreaming. You can have a dream in astral and have flashback days, weeks, months later or never at all, and the flash backs would seem like a real world flashback if you did not know better. In our western society, I am not sure if many are aware of astral dreaming, vs regular dreaming.

The others who have these so called real alien encounters, where their cars are stopped. I believe we are looking at one and the same and it’s government related. I just watched a video and in it the Targeted Individual talks about how they stop her car from working, that they mess with the electrical system or something and it just stops working remotely, much like many of our appliances and electronics. No she has never claimed alien abduction, she is just a standard target, who’s life they are trying to ruin. How many of these so called alien encounters do you hear about how the cars stop working, and suddenly the people are asleep and they loose time? Well you can disable a car remotely with some of this technology, and putting people asleep, subliminal acoustic manipulation of the nervous system. As a target I have experienced this. Being put to sleep like right away. When you have experienced it and know what is happening, you can shield against it, and it’s not that hard. You can read more about this here.

http://www.targetedindividuals.com/subliminal-acoustic-manipulation-of-nervous-systems/

[quote]
In human subjects, sensory resonances can be excited by subliminal atmospheric acoustic pulses that are tuned to the resonance frequency. The 1/2 Hz sensory resonance affects the autonomic nervous system and may cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise acoustic frequency near 1/2 Hz used. The effects of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes, sleepiness, and disorientation. For these effects to occur, the acoustic intensity must lie in a certain deeply subliminal range. Suitable apparatus consists of a portable battery-powered source of weak subaudio acoustic radiation. The method and apparatus can be used by the general public as an aid to relaxation, sleep, or sexual arousal, and clinically for the control and perhaps treatment of insomnia, tremors, epileptic seizures, and anxiety disorders.
[/quote]

Now these strange alien reports go back to the 40′s and 50′s? Again I don’t want to knock people’s beliefs in aliens, but if these have all been experiments then they have been experimenting on people and pulling this fake alien garbage for some time now. When I did briefly examine Conti’s material, I found that she had the same things in her community. Fake forums, shrills, disinformation, people trying to confuse the truth so real abductees can not figure out what is going on, so they end up confused about wither it’s aliens, government, a combination or whatever. She also cited a lot of fake information being deliberately put out there. The same was true for 9/11 truth, for the HIV and AIDS dissident community, and several other communities I briefly researched. There is a disinformation culture and many of these sites be it extremist sites, conspiracy sites, they are either A) Not run by who you think runs them, or even if they started out being legit, they are so over run now and compromised that real discussions get buried. Interesting topics do not get responded to, or shut down. Real debates get bullied. The same way they learnt to control and take over other sites. You have no idea how controlled and over run most online forums are.


http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/the-real-fight/

[quote]There are other stories, but the same M.O. the more they investigate, people in positions of authority, with power, to pull strings. Many of these investigations go back to government or the church, and those in high level positions.
Gang Stalking, Mind Control, it’s all the same things. We are small appendages fighting the same thing. Think of it as an octopus. Eight arms, Each arm corrupt. If you are not seeing the bigger picture, you are fighting one arm of corruption, and another person is fighting a different arm of corruption, but it’s all coming from the same beast.

After investigating this for two years, view others and the indeepth research that they have done, and my own, in my opinion it’s the government.[/quote]

Anyways there was more I wanted to share, but I think that is enough for now, except to say that in my dreams I keep thinking things were bad enough, and instead of even lifting a finger or doing anything to help, someone actually had the inhumanity to unkindly expose me to worst than I was already going through. In the dream that what I remember most. Oh and something about they are coming to get you.

If this turns out to be more than a dream, and for some reason I go missing, you are required to come find me in the government facility where I am being held, guns blazing. :-)

How do we stop Gang Stalking?

So people keep asking what we can do to stop Gang Stalking?

I was on a forum recently and one person told people they could stop Gang Stalking by moving to the heart of the forest, and destroying their cellphone. Sure if you wish to disconnect from society, live off the scraps of the forest, and leave your stuff behind when you move this might just work, but otherwise, most targets need real solutions as they go through months, and then years of being systemically destroyed.

Now these people are stalking a lot of us because they deem us, or believe us to be mentally ill, on drugs, perverts, whatever. For those being listed as mentally ill, you would think that the logical thing to do would be to get a mental health examination, but from the articles pertaining to the psychiatric reprisal, we learn that psychiatrists are all too willing to list innocent, sane people as mentally ill, thus getting an examination will not necessarily clear you.

What we could do is get out own team, eg. A threat assessment team, to review decisions that have been made by others. Eg. In the Jane Clift case if there was a none bias committee she could have appealed to, to see if her listing was justified, it could have saved her four years of legal trouble, and having to leave her community.

The problem many of us have is that we have never seen our community files, we don't know the information that has been listed. I do know there is a lot of false information in mine, just on things that I have observed, that these people believe to be true. I do know they have falsely listed me as having some sort of a mental illness, because I dared to take some company to task for harassment. The problem is having open access to files, and a none partial party that is willing to listen, and understand that these files have a lot of false information. Staged incidents, incidents that do not even involve the target, like Jiverly Wong did, but the lies do not seem to matter, it's just what people are willing to believe.

The other solution of course is there are villages for the mentally ill. Those who are homeless might be able to take advantage of these communities that are springing up, again the problem with this is that many targets though falsely listed as mentally ill, are not mentally ill. When you are desperate however, this could be a temporary safe harbour, but ofcourse this is what they want. Targets housed together so they can "keep an eye on the mentally ill."

The best solution would be to get the laws changed, thus targets who are listed, must be informed that they have been added to the registry, they must be informed for what they have been added, thus they have a legal right to pursue action, and to ensure the information listed on their files is not one sided. I think this is the best solution, but could take years to implement.

Now there are groups who have caught the eye of politicians, surely that will help? To be honest you can have a thousand groups, with the eye of a thousand politicians and that will not help if they are misleading and looking at false precepts, or stalking gangs, etc. I have yet to hear any of these groups address the occupational health and safety laws, and the mental health laws that are being used to list targets, till this silence is broken, and addressed, these groups could do a thousand campaigns, but it it's not the right one, it will just waste the time, energy and resources that targets don't have to waste.

At the end of the day, exposure and awareness is still the key. Four years ago, I had to fight to keep my threads on forums, they would get deleted, my accounts banned, the threads would get disrupted by fake targets, and then get closed. Any time head way was being made, they would block it, just to protect this system.

Things have changed somewhat. The conspiracy sites, and some extremist sites are now fully aware of what Gang Stalking is. Gang Stalking is slowly making it's way into some of the more mainstream forums. There are still those who try to dismiss it off hand as an urban legand, or a sign of mental illness, but there are others who discuss it openly, and in some ways it's getting normalized. The idea is to get the normalization to occur much more rapidly, while keeping the topic relevant. Eg. Mobbing is exposed, but someday's I am not sure this makes any difference to the targets of mobbing. There is little point in getting this normalized to the stage where it becomes irrelevant. Eg. Priests molesting children had it's shock value, but today stories of this do not cause the same outrage, even though it still happening to a large degree. It's become normalized, but not as relevant as it once was.

So moving forward, targets are the best for exposing this, if we stay on targeted forums, and don't mingle with others, the information will not get out. The idea is to mingle, share information, but share good information. The term Gang Stalking is the term I use. Most targets after trying the organized stalking term, seem to switch back in a lot of cases to Gang Stalking. It's just the most popular term. I think Organized Gang Stalking is also ok, but use what suites you the best, I don't care what term people use, as long as the correct concept is conveyed, and what is behind this is conveyed.

Elementary, My Dear Watson

People have no idea what it's like trying to expose the biggest cover up. The reality is that this is not such a big cover up anymore, the truth is out there, but so many keep covering up for this system.

Now I don't know if Sherlock Investigations is real, or if this is just another shrill front online, but I have written to this blog, and left a comment. If they choose not to post the comment, well I won't be surprised. It's just a comment to the book Closing The Gap, and the free sample which explains what this is.

Now I am not accusing this company, but I am not an investigator, and I have been able to discover what is behind Gang Stalking, so if these investigative companies can not, then maybe targets need to find more skilled companies to work with.

Here is a post from Sherlock investigations. I can tell you that if I was going to hire a private investigator, I would look for one with a lot more skill, and a much more open mind. That's my personal opinion.

http://blog.sherlockinvestigations.com/
[quote]Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Gang Stalking

It doesn't mean that I believe in gang stalking! I've investigated many cases of gang stalking and come to the conclusion that it doesn't exist.

When you think about it, gang stalking is illogical. First, it is costly. Secondly, who has the time, unless they're paid a lot, which brings us back to "it's costly."

People often contact me who left a job on unfavorable conditions. They think their former employer has people stalking them all over the country, wherever they go. In this economy employers are too concerned running their businesses. They don't stalk former employees.

Somebody told me the other day said that gang stalkers are comprised of organized crime figures, and they're practicing. Practicing? People in organized crime (like hit men), don't practice. They do their job and move on.

People who claim they're being gang stalked often say the police are involved. Maybe that's because the police think they're paranoid and delusional. They turn against the police. They often say that when they drive, 40 to 50 cars follow them. Everyone in their neighborhood knows what they do behind closed doors, or at work their fellow employees whisper about them.

Frankly, people who think they're being "gang stalked" are mentally ill. If you are mentally ill, it's not a stigma, but many people don't accept that they're mentally ill and refuse treatment. If you think you're being gang stalked, see a doctor. There is help for you.
1diggdigg

posted by Skipp Porteous @ 1:59 PM[/quote]

Probably knows that God and parallel worlds don't exist either. But let's look at what he says.

Why is Gang Stalking illogical? This is the definintion from Gang Stalking World.

http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/GSFAQ.html

[quote]

A Simple Definition

Under Occupational Health and Safety laws, individuals are being flagged and placed on community notification lists. This is happening without the targets knowledge. In many countries these community notifications are being used by companies and others to target innocent individuals such as whistle-blowers, the outspoken, etc. In conjunction with these notifications, companies and others are in some cases using a practice that was used in the former soviet union called the psychiatric reprisal. This is used as a means of retaliation, blacklisting, silencing, or controlling members of society. Once on the notification system, warnings about the targets are sent out to every individual the target comes in contact with, thus poisoning their associations, and socially annexing the targeted individual.

[/quote]

I will tell you who has the time. The community have the time, when they believe that their community is under attack by a dangerous individual, when the state gives them a false sense of empowerment, and community spirit, the community has the time, means, and methods to pull this off. We have seen dozens of cases of how they run pedophile out of communities, yet this investigator is telling us, he can't imagine it. Limited imagination. They see people on these lists, people often falsely listed as being mentally ill as a threat, period, and they are fully willing to torture innocent people, and do dispicable things, until you end up with Jiverly Wong's and Yvonne Hiller outcomes. Any decent agency would be working towards exposing this, but too many in society who cry oppression on the one hand, gladly support this sickness on the other.

This is often set in place by former employees, againg back to the occupational health and safety laws. They are the ones who often use this to put people, innocent workers on these lists, claiming that they are mentally ill, when they are not.

The police are involved. If you are on one of these lists, you call the cops, the fire department, anything official, your name pops up. In the case of Jane Clift, medium risk, only to be seen in pairs. In other cases it will say danger to self or others. The police are involved, and are also protecting this sick system.

Targets are followed, because as they go through a community the phone rings, if you are listed as mentally ill, they will get that notification. It's an automated notification. So then the neighbours go on the porches, or get in the cars, and have a good old boy time, tracking the targets, a lot of which turn out to be single women, and minorities, but we are seeing others like the extremist set's and conspiracy set, plus the whistle-blowers.

Also the community does put them under surveillance, the community goes so ape, that they think, oh it's a mentally ill person they could hurt someone, we better watch them. Frankly from what I have seen, many of the watchers, are sick frinking freaks, who should be watched themselves. Psycho's, and sadistic freaks.

So with your great investigative wisdom you come to the conclusion that those who believe in Gang Stalking are mentally ill, I am going to go out on a limb and guess that those who do not, are either not very well educated, and have not truly taken the time or effort to research the topic, or they are likely shrills who are here to cover up the topic, in either case, these are not the types I would want to personally pay good money, to investigate this for me.

Buring the candles at both ends

Buring the candles at both ends.

After reading Mark's post and finding that my situation was similar to his in ways that i did not like, I decided to make some drastic changes to some areas in my life that needed changing. I think those changes are going in the right direction, even though the short term outlook is not good, the long term outlook is fairly good.

I still have the same mentally underdeveloped informants in my realm. At least one in this batch, seems especially nasty, and I can't help wishing him unwell, hey that's just me. Interpret that however you like, you whiny crybaby.

Otherwise my focus is in several areas, trying to get everything done. Trying not to get sucked into the drama of others, and trying to find the best way to untangle.

From what I have read, the system in many countries is being used in horrible ways. Husbands who are sick of their wives are having them committed for no reason what so ever. Using the flimsiest of excuses. It's incredible.

http://psychrights.org/index.htm

The state is listing people as a danger to themselves or others on the flimsiest excuses, and as I have mentioned dozens of times, there is a conspiracy that happens within all of this, of those around the target systemically trying to destroy the persons life. For me, it's trying to divide and conquer, or keep me financially where I don't need to be. Dependency on the system is not a good thing in any capacity.

Have not had a chance to check for an update on Mark, but when you are in a situation you can see things a lot more clearly than those outside of the situation. Many people talk conspiracy, but few can actually understand what it's like or been like to have lived one.

Conspiracy is not just consisting of the state, it is consisting of friends, family, co-workers, and those around a target. The target's life is not destroyed in a bubble, it is not as first thought, the targets life is destroyed by a system, a very willing, enabling system of conspirators. Can it change? Of course it can. I have no doubt about this, but people like this system, and that is why it has not changed.

Spiritually, I am ok, but missing my happy place in spirit a bit, but not sure why? Sometimes spiritual questions can only be answered in spirit.

Am I a part of the conspiracy club? No, the answer remains the same. People are deeply stupid. I despise this system, and all that was done to me. So for me, it means not joining forces with something that I think is inheritantly evil, no matter how many times I have pointed this out on the blog, people just still do not get it.

There are many types of people in this world. Those who are victimized and they go on to do whatever they can in their power to ensure it does not happen to anyone else again. Then there are those who are victimized and do everything in their power to ensure the others are victimized in the same way or worth. A type of sick pathology. You try to help them with the one hand, and they try to drag you down with the other.

I think a lot of people that have been targeted by this system are broken in just that way, and become exactly that. I think this system likes to try to acquire people that are not a part of it, and what they can not acquire they try to destroy.

I still get the odd informant trying to gain access to my life, and they always come of pretending to be something they are not. It's funny that way. The complete lack of understanding of what a target goes through. They really just don't get it. Most think that this system is something special. I think targets understand that this system is evil. I think the way this is used is evil.

So that's my two cent's for what it's worth. Basically busy, alone in flesh, and spirit? Working towards doing what I can to get this out of my life, but to also try to make sure others are aware of what is happening with this system. Many do not yet understand what this system is, and or what it is capable of.

It means that you can not, absolutely can not trust those around you, a simple comment, question, innocent conversation, can and will be used against you. You must be wise as wolves, and innocent as doves.

("Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be shrewd as serpents and innocent as doves.) Matthew 10:16

Absolutely do not trust anyone. That sounds paranoid, but if you have lived through this system, then you understand it's reach, it's corruption, and it's capacity to destroy. Pray consistently.

Danger

New line out at zazzle. This line is dedicated to all the innocent men and women who have been targeted by the state. As you walk out in public go about your business there is a conspiracy against you.

Your friends, family, neighbors, coworkers, and even online counterparts that you try to associate with are likely getting a similar notice. Something to the effect that you are a danger, or a danger to others. You might have a risk level designation, and the additional benefit of a label that says, you are only to be seen in pairs. This goes out and it's in part along with the gossip, lies, slander, and set up's used to systemically destroy your lives.

It's nice to see a line dedicated to the states destruction of innocent lives.  You can get caps, mugs, t-shirts, keychains, bags, bumper stickers, etc.

Enjoy the new line. If the state sees you as a danger, then you are likely doing something right, so say it loud, say it proud.

Link 1

Link 2

Impasse. Open Secret

Impasse/Open Secret.

I have said this before, but I will say this again. What is happening is no longer a secret. This is now an open secret, everyone knows about it, but no one says anything about it.

So it's not as if what is happening to targets is a secret. Even though the mainstream media has not exactly broken the story, the story is broken, it is out there. Now some even with all the evidence will continue to sing the same song, oh targets are crazy, but enough of you now know, are aware, and are part of the secret club, so that you can understand that a lot of what has been presented is truth.

So I am having a Gary Webb moment, perhaps bad example to use, but all I mean by this is, I have broken this story, it's big, and I expect the media to come and take up the story. I expect people to be grateful for the truth, (I really don't), but even if the mainstream would not cover this, I have spent the last four years online hearing about how the mainstream hides the truth, how we are being lied to, how there is a conspiracy, and that it seeks to harm us, well know what, I have just given you a conspiracy, told you the truth, and tried to help not just targets, but others.

Is the none mainstream rushing to share and publish the story, are they rushing to make sure the truth comes to light? No they are doing exactly what the mainstream does, or what they first did with the Mai Lia Massacre or what they totally did with the Gary Webb story. It's all out there, people know, but no one in authority, no one responsible, and even most on the lower levels will do anything about it. This is why truth does not get revealed, this is why conspiracies exist. Often they are not dark little secrets that no one knows about, no in fact they are often open secrets that happen in pockets, with sometimes thousands, upon thousands being aware, but feeling bound to silence or secrecy.

Impasse. I think I have done most of what I set out to do, as far as discovering what was happen, getting the concept more normalized, but getting it fully exposed takes a village. I know the members of this village have first been silenced, unable to speak. I also know that many have given their loyalty and allegiance to this system, but if you don't speak the truth, get this revealed then who will?

I don't expect anyone to break the law exactly, but there are often cleaver ways of doing things if you wish to do them. I am ok with writing the articles, and doing the research that I can do, in fact if I could find a way, I would spend most of my time doing research, yes I am boring that way, but I find it fun.

Anyways so I am at an impasse, I have done what I was suppose to do for the most part. I even figured out a couple of other conspiracies along the way. Speaking of which, the civilian spy force are now clear on this right. You are what will be the heart and soul of the surveillance network that is formed? It's happening slowly, and quietly, you are being bound in secrecy, so you can not speak of it, but this New World Order is being built on the backbone of this civilian force army. You in your communities, villages, and hamlets, you are who will be the handmaids of the New World Order, their eyes, their ears, their hands. A global, one world, surveillance, society. You will punish their enemies, you will systemically help to remove them, and you will believe that you are doing it for good, that it is something that must be done, should be done. The state wills it and it will be so. This is no different than in any other time period, and most will never see it for the evil that it is. This is the truth, wither you will believe it or not is another story, but there it is. Open Secret, and my impasse.

I remain prayerful. I think in times such as this, that is what you can do. Anyways I am not sad, or discouraged, I am just like, ok this is what it is. I realise that people have to wrap their minds around this. I have now had years, and most are just starting to wrap their minds around this, so I am going to leave you with this to mull over, send out good wishes, and come back to it and see what you say. In the meantime, if anyone out there in society has any good ideas, please feel free to leave a comment.


Thanks,

How the system is working

This is a brief summary for targets still trying to grasp what might have happened and how their lives wound up in this place. Using some of these occupational health and safety/mental health laws, to the best of my knowledge workplaces, civil officials and others, can have a another official, deem a person as a danger to themselves or others. In more severe cases they might even go so far as to try to list you as gravely disabled, as they did with Britney Spears.

They can do this all behind your back. Health officials can declare you a danger to yourself, others, suffering from a mental illness, or even gravely disabled, based on the information provided to them by a third party. The third party does not even have to be the one initiating the complaint. However if you are fully functioning, they would have a hard time committing you, as we saw with the Lindsay Lohan case, who did not meet the criteria for a 5150 hold, but they apparently did suggest it. I think since she has obtained a lawyer, they have not been so bold to try this again.

Here is an example of such a senario. Eg. A employer wants to get rid of an employee who has been consistently complaining, they suggest they see a company paid psychiatrist.

http://www.harassment101.com/Article5.html

Under existing laws in some countries, states, etc. They can suggest but can not force a person to. What they can do however is add a lot of stuff to your file. They might even use evidence from the very individuals that you are making the complaint against, making it look as if you are the problem. This has been well documented by the mobbing community so I don't think that I have to re-document this.

Once they bring your file often to one of their company paid psychiatrists, community health and safety review boards, university threat assessment teams, etc, they can then list you as a danger, or suffering from a mental illness. They can do that based on the criteria that says you are unable to function cause you are mentally impaired on how you are perceiving the things around you, or showing a degradation.

Once they list you as mentally ill, a danger to yourself or others, you are then placed on the lists. These lists act the same way the pedophile lists act. If you are walking through a community, the phone rings they get a call, dangerous, or mentally ill person in the area. Remember in many cases, you will not be aware of the drastic steps your employer, spouse, parent, civil authority, or others has taken. The only thing you will be aware of is the sudden harassment and community surveillance. As we have seen, when you try to complain about it and report it, they use this to say that you are suffering from a mental illness. The reality is the target is being systemically harassed and destroyed. This is being used as a means of retaliation by employers, civil workers in the community and others.

So those around you get contacted, told not to say anything, and ofcourse the useful idiots around you assume that it's true, most act accordingly, which just makes your situation worst. You can then add in the fact that you might still be experiencing the original situation of harassment that you were in, when you made the complaint, this was the situation with the Damon Thompson case. Then any further attempts you make to get help or assistance for legitimate harasment that might still be happening, and which is likely to have escalated, is just viewed as further signs of your mental degredation.

In the Damon Thompson case, he did end up lashing out. This is then used to show that the diagnosis was correct, but the reality is much like workplace mobbing targets who lash out, there is more to the story. The reality is that listing an innocent person as mentally ill, is likely to be a catch 22, or self fulfilling prophecy. The listing ensures that the harassment gets multiplied, and thus often brings about more severe outcomes.

The listings of course cause the community to go into overdrive. Oh no a mentally ill person amongst us, we can't have that, and they do perform the harassment behaviours that targets have listed. Remember they will use all the tactics that they would use against pedophiles against targets, and then some, but what has been documented is a deliberate campaign of harassment. Organized, orchestrated, including gaslighting, subtle harassment. They do it, cause they think that you are mentally ill, no one will believe you, and as targets have documented, the police don't help, doctors, etc. They all use the listing to assume that you are mentally ill. Remember suggesting that there is a conspiracy against you, or that you are being tortured is a sign of mental illness, but the problem is that when someone goes behind your back, lists you as a danger to yourself, and others, or lists you as mentally ill, and tells everyone else but you, that is a conspiracy. Also when these citizen informants in the course of their monitoring use things like wicked lasers, or remote electronic monitoring devices to
surveil the target, and it harms the target, the target is fully correct in saying that they are being tortured. In both cases, this is what is happening with many targets, so under these circumstances the target is fully correct.

Again in most cases, you will likely have been wrongly assessed by some company shrill, salivating to do their masters bidding, or some equally panting community shrill. Maybe I am being harsh, and maybe some of these people really do make the only judgement that they can based on the lies that they are told. But when you are assessing someone based on one side of a story, that side being an employer, maybe family member with ulterior motives, civil employee, or other, there has to be more to go on before destroying someones life, but there is not.

Once you are listed and those around you are notified, most take advantage of the situation, any little conflict, they use it to paint you as a danger. Even where they is no conflict, we see stories getting made up, deliberate set up's, eg. Mentally ill looking individuals being in the same location where the target is, so that your oh so kind community members can call it in. Now remember the average person is told there is a mentally ill person in the area, sometimes they are given a description, sometimes it just vague. So they will look around for anything that looks crazy and report it. Behind the scenes, there is a deliberate effort happening, to ensure that such people are in locations where the target is, so that the reports can keep coming, remember at this stage there is a bit of funding that goes into this, and the more mentally ill people the better. Also they don't want it to come out that they are doing what they did in Russia, which is listing perfectly sane and healthy people as mentally ill, thus it's in their best interests to use the useful idiots around you to carry out their bidding.

Again calling people useful idiots is harsh. They are often lied to. They see information and are given information that looks real, they are in many cases lied to and most people are simple, basic, they can not understand or conceive of the type of conspiracy being used against targets, or believe that the state would go through so much effort for one person. What people have to understand is that this is not so much effort for one person. This is a system. A system that is already in place with these types of resources, so that one person is like an ant colony dealing with an errant fly, that get's into it's path. The network is already in place, already set up in each community, all they have to do is point, click, tell the people whom to hate, and they do it. It's no more expensive to get rid of one person than it is 20 if the network is already in place.

So you have the situation that most targets wake up to find themselves in. Being hunted, targeted, and having no idea why. You have those around the target that have been advised of their mental illness, danger to society, status, and the society goes on this. You have the target realising that their is a conspiracy, and the community thinking the person is having a breakdown and "doing everything to see that the target gets the help that they need." A beautiful little symphony that usually results in the destruction of the target, by the malicious, or well meaning useful idiots around them.

The laws that are being used. Occupational Health and Safety, Workplace Violence Prevention, Mental health acts are where I am looking. This often starts in the community, work, school, etc, but once remotely evaluated, this goes into a couple of other areas. Mental health act laws, cause those in some cases are what are used, in other cases, it's occupational health and safety laws, depends on the situation. The distribution of information, to the wide and varied world falls under the privacy laws, and what the rights of the individual are vs, the community at large. Eg. Though you might have the right to alert those around a target that they are in immediate contact with, do you really have the right to alert someone in bora, bora, whom they will never have any physical contact with, but are doing business with? No, but they are using this to systemically poison the lives of targets. Using it to harass them online, to disrupt business dealings and associations, to systemically blacklist and blackball innocent people.

Civil action. This is where we might be able to sue, under civil laws, if the information that has been supplied is false, information leading to you further being listed as mentally ill, dangerous. If targets can then access Freedom Of Information files, there are records kept of complaints, then they can try to use this to sue for any false or inaccurate information. If anyone has made a false statement or testimony deliberately, then this is the clause that would allow you to sue. This seems to work for America, Canada, and there is a U.K. clause. I think the U.K. clause works for most of Europe and Australia's laws should be similar to laws governing the U.K.

So in getting proper assistance, you might want to ask for a lawyer that is skilled in privacy laws, labor laws, and mental health laws. Jane Clift was lucky, and targets have to be equally lucky to get the right assistance, or you will just be bounced around. Add to that that some lawyers are bound by the confidentiality of the program and might have a conflict of interest in discussing some of this information, and there you have it Bob's your uncle, more or less a basic set up to this system. I am not a lawyer, but from what I have been able to gleam with my many hours of research, this should be a ruff idea of how this is working.

The Psychiatric Reprisal. Part 2 & 3

Named: People who become very angry, like Mr. T in the A Team, could have 'intermittent explosive disorder'

Do you live surrounded by clutter - ancient copies of magazines, your children’s old toys, articles you’ve clipped out of newspapers over the years?

If you find it hard to throw out things of limited or no value, you could be suffering from hoarding disorder.

‘Hoarding’ is just one of the new mental conditions being added to the psychiatrists’ bible, or the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (DSM), to give it its proper name.

Other new conditions identified as possibly needing professional help include binge eating - which is said to affect many people who are seriously obese - and ‘cognitive tempo disorder’, which seems very like laziness (symptoms include dreaminess and sluggishness).

There’s also ‘intermittent explosive disorder’, which involves occasionally becoming very angry suddenly.

Most bizarre of the proposed additions is one defined as ‘getting a thrill at being outraged by pornography’.

3

It seems that those in the western world who do not fall in line and follow the norms that the society prescribes as normal, could soon be in for an experience similar to that of the former Soviet Union.

Childhood temper tantrums, teenage irritability and binge eating may soon rate as psychiatric disorders in the US, according to proposed changes to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, the bible of the psychiatric profession.

4

Things like childhood temper tantrums, teenage angst, and binge eating, might in today's society be unpopular, but are they worthy of being classified as signs of mental illness and possibly being drugged away?

Proposed changes to the U.S. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) could include reclassifying childhood temper tantrums, teenage angst, and binge eating as psychiatric disorders. If accepted, the proposals could equal billions of dollars in new revenue for pharmaceutical companies.

5

Is being antisocial really a sign of mental illness? Are these laws just designed to target those who do not fit into a future state agenda?

The new edition may include "disorders" like "oppositional defiant disorder", which includes people who have a pattern of "negativistic, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior toward authority figures." Some of the "symptoms" of this disorder including losing one's temper, annoying people and being "touchy".

Other "disorders" being considered include personality flaws like antisocial behavior, arrogance, cynicism or narcissism. There are even categories for people who binge eat and children who have temper tantrums.

Children are already over-diagnosed for allegedly being bipolar or having attention-deficit disorder (ADD), which results in their being prescribed dangerous antipsychotic drugs. To categorize even more childhood behaviors as psychiatric disorders will only further increase the number of children who will be needlessly prescribed antipsychotic drugs.

6

Is western society slowly implementing many of the same criteria that allowed Soviet psychiatrists to label many healthy individuals as mentally ill, just by following a criteria and trying to lump everyone into those criteria, and weeding out the ones who do not fit?

The APA panel is also suggesting adding a new condition category to DSM called "risk syndromes". People who are suspected to potentially be at risk for developing a mental disorder but do not yet have one would be deemed as having "psychosis risk syndrome". This category would include teenagers who exhibit "excessive suspicion, delusions and disorganized speech or behavior," for example.

The APA made it clear that its goal with the revisions is to diagnose people as early as possible with mental disorders, even before they actually have them, in order to get them on treatment.

6

If these risk syndromes are added to the new update, then you could be dealt with not for having a mental disorder, but just for having a factor that puts you at risk of having a mental disorder. You could be in treatment for just being suspected of potentially being at risk for developing a mental disorder.

"It not only determines how mental disorders are diagnosed, it can impact how people see themselves and how we see each other," Alan Schatzberg, president of the American Psychiatric Association, which publishes the guide, told reporters. "It influences how research is conducted as well as what is researched. It affects legal matters, industry and government programmes."

4

Might such factors already be affecting how we interact with each other? How we view each other? Are these criteria or similar being used to falsely diagnose individuals in western society as having a mental illness when they do not?

Cases

In the article giving workers the treatment, Peter Downs cites several cases of workers who complained and then were asked to see a psychiatrist. This is happening at thousands upon thousands of workplaces in many democratic societies. A condition of continued employment might even be based on such a forced encounter.

The first case sited in the article is that of Norm Crosty

On October 5, 1998, Norm Crosty sent a letter to the labor relationsdepartment at his plant. Crosty, for thirteen years an electrician at Ford Motor Company's Wixom, Michigan, assembly plant, complained that he could not do his job because so many of his bosses were taking the necessary equipment out of the plant to work on their homes or personal businesses.

The next day, the plant director of human resources invoked a Ford program for combating workplace violence to bar Crosty from the factory and ordered him to see a company-paid psychiatrist or lose his job.

7

In this case for making what was a very legitimate claim, the worker was not only barred from his place of employment, but was ordered to see a psychiatrist. The ford program for combating workplace violence, most likely falls under the occupational health and safety laws that have been used to target others.

A little more than fourteen months later, and 725 miles away, officials at Emory University cited a similar concern about violence to justify using armed guards to escort Dr. James Murtagh off university property when Dr. R. Wayne Alexander, chairman of the department of medicine at Emory, ordered him to see a company-selected psychiatrist or lose his job. Six weeks earlier, Murtagh, a professor of pulmonology at Emory, had filed a false claims suit against the university, alleging that it had misspent millions of dollars in federal grant money.

7

It seems that members of society who complain, blow the whistle, or assert their rights at work, are being targeted under these health and safety provisions. The laws were originally put in place to protect the rights of workers who have the right to a safe work environment, but it seems that they are increasingly used to silence those who continue to complain, blow the whistle, or file complaints. Many targets of workplace mobbing, who complain about it, or get angry about it, seem to be having warning markers or notifications placed on their files often without their knowledge or awareness.

Across the United States, companies have seized upon concerns about workplace violence to quash dissent. Hundreds of large corporations have hired psychiatrists and psychologists as consultants to advise them on how to weed out "threatening" employees. They say they are only responding to a 1970 directive from the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration that they maintain a "safe and secure work environment." But by drawing the definition of "threatening" as broadly as possible, they are giving themselves a new club to bang over the heads of workers.

Maria Buffa, a former salaried employee in the personnel department at Ford World Headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan, said she, too, was sent to a psychiatrist after she filed a sexual harassment complaint in February 1999 against a woman co-worker. "You think, maybe I am the problem, else why would they be sending me to a psychiatrist,"

7

This pattern of the state using psychiatrists to follow a set of diagnostic markers to access workers remotely, often without interviewing the workers is very similar to the pattern that was happening in the former Soviet Union, which allowed many innocent individuals to be falsely misdiagnosed.

As you might expect, the Postal Service, given its reputation for workplace violence, has bought into the psychiatric testing. Last September, Postal Service executives proposed to give line supervisors the right to order emergency psychiatric exams for employees who are argumentative. Unionists say this will jeopardize their ability to represent their members. "

Albanese admits there are some people who clearly need help, but he says the Postal Service has so broadened its definition of events that can trigger a mandatory exam that "it is very easy to tie someone up in that psychiatric situation." According to the APWU, "The following is a list of factors that a supervisor can consider when deciding whether or not to send an employee for a fitness-for-duty exam: significant increases in unscheduled absences, increased bathroom use, changes in behavior or work performance after lavatory or lunch breaks, deterioration in personal hygiene and/or cleanliness of the work location, inattention to work duties and progressive deterioration in concentration and memory, [and] threatening behavior. Supervisors can also impose emergency fitness-for-duty exams if an employee becomes argumentative, or shows an unusual interest in news stories or literature dealing with violence."

7

These could be people who also just do not enjoy their jobs very much. Unscheduled absences, increased bathroom use, changes in behavior or workplace performance. How many workplaces implement unpopular changes which drive some workers away from their normal job functions, or make the regular job functions so unbearable that they just do not wish to be in the environment? Lot's of companies do, thus many individuals at one point in their lives or another might fall into this criteria.

The web site for Michael H. Corcoran, Ph.D. & Associates, Inc., for example, asks: "Will the expert you consult be willing to render an opinion of dangerousness and be willing to put it in writing?" and "Will the expert be willing to do this without interviewing the subject personally?"

Some psychiatrists in the field doubt that any reliable judgment can be made without interviewing the subject.

7

Yet it seems that in the case of many individuals that is exactly what is happening. People are being assessed remotely, and yes some psychiatrists are diagnosing patients as mentally ill, schizophrenic, etc. They are then having warning markers placed on their files, placing them on notification lists, they are then subsequently followed around and harassed by the community at large. A practice that the Targeted Individual community has come to call and classify as Gang Stalking.

Speaking for himself, he says it is possible to tell if a worker is likely to become violent on the job, but not with 100 percent accuracy. But, he insists, "it will require more than just one session with the worker, and it will also require information from other sources close to the patient, including relatives, acquaintances in the neighborhood, work, etc." If a psychiatrist is evaluating someone who is already on the job, he says, "one measure to prevent mistakes is to require a second opinion. That would give the individual the option to appeal and have his or her own evaluator."

Unionists are skeptical of the objectivity of the psychiatrists the companies use. "We call them prostitutes, because they will write whatever the Postal Service wants them to," says Shirley McLennan, vice president of APWU Local 4 in Louisville, Kentucky, of the doctors who do fitness-for-duty exams.

7

What if the information is coming from hostile other sources, such as jealous neighbours, or even distant neighbours, hostile co-workers, and family who immediately assume that their relatives are mentally ill, just based on the criteria of being interviewed about wither their relative could be mentally ill?

Donald Soeken, a former U.S. Public Health Service psychiatric social worker who used to be in charge of giving fitness-for-duty exams, says the psychiatric exams almost always are shams. "The doctor will go into all the areas that could discredit a person," Soeken says. "He'll ask early life questions, late life questions, sexual questions, whatever he wants to ask, and then write it up and give it to the boss or law firm. Any doctor worth his salt will find something wrong, or even make up something, and if you don't answer one of his questions, then you are uncooperative and you can be fired for that, too. What they are trying to do is put a person out on a psychiatric disability. If they succeed, you would never work again in your lifetime."

Soeken is sometimes called the father of the fight against abusive fitness-for-duty exams. While doing such exams for federal employees at the Public Health Service's outpatient clinic in Washington, D.C., in 1978, he discovered that many of the people sent to him were either whistleblowers or people who had a personality clash with the boss. The employer making the referrals expected him to give them the ammunition to get rid of employees for mental health reasons.

7

Though not the exact same as being sent off to a Soviet Union state mental health facility, this practice could render a worker unable to work again. It could render a worker unfit to stay gainfully employed because they choose to blow the whistle, or had a disagreement with the boss. This practice in American society has been in place since at least the 1970, and similar practices are in other democratic countries.

After leaving the Public Health Service in 1994, Soeken established Integrity International to assist whistleblowers in the private sector. Since then, he has testified as an expert witness in seventy psychiatric reprisal lawsuits. Soeken warns anyone who will listen not to trust the company psychiatrist.

"If you assume the doctor is concerned about your health and well-being, you've made a deadly assumption," he says. "They are looking for any phrase or evidence they can use against you to stereotype you as schizophrenic, paranoid, or delusional."

7

This is why individuals who have never seen a mental health professional can be classified as delusional, schizophrenic, paranoid, etc, without ever having had a mental health exam. This can be done remotely. Remember this is not happening in the former Soviet Union, this is not happening in China, this is happening in democratic countries. America, Canada, The U.K., and many other democratic countries. Along with many none democratic countries.

Tom Devine, legal director for the Government Accountability Project. Often, another goal is to smear and discredit the employee. That, he said, is why psychiatric harassment "is unsurpassed in its ugliness."

In Crosty's case, a notice on the company bulletin board announced he had been expelled from the plant for psychiatric reasons. "It was very demeaning," says Crosty. With the help of an attorney, and after he was cleared by four different psychiatrists, he got his job back, but "I was totally discredited as some kind of kook and wacko," he says.

In Murtagh's case, administrators at Emory "spread a rumor that he could be armed and dangerous, and a terrorist threat," says Devine, whose organization has taken up Murtagh's defense.

7

These practicies are being used across democratic workplaces, educational facilities, and other areas of society. These practices are being used on unsuspecting members of society. It's being used to discriminate, silence, and destroy the lives on many innocent individuals. In addition to fit for duty exams, warning markers are being placed on files, citizens are being declared as having mental illnesses, in many cases without having ever been assessed by a health professional, and even if they are assessed, there is no guarantee of a fair assessment, in some cases these health professionals are going on rumours and hearsay of the administration that wants to have the worker removed from their job.

Based on this criteria it's easy for the system to not only be abused by Employers, but also by employees who wish to get away with harassing fellow coworkers. Eg. If an employee complains too much, files a complaint, they can be placed on a notification system. If other employees go to Human Resources with complaints about an employee, reports are gathered together. The information is forwarded from Human Resources, and then to the Occupational Health and Safety team members who can be made up of a number of internal employees, plus a number of outside employers. Some workplaces and universities even have a special threat assessment team to determine if a worker could become a danger to themselves or others.

Employees and Educational facilities can recommend that a worker seek psychiatric assistance, or even use the Employee Assistance Program if one is in place, but in many cases they can not force an employee to undergo an assessment, what they can do instead is they can add a warning marker to an employees file. Using the occupational health and safety, workplace violence prevention laws, they can add a warning marker without the individuals knowledge. Once a warning marker is added, which could say a variety of things, including that the subject has displayed violent behaviours, might be suffering from mental health issues, etc. A notification is sent out to everyone in the targets environment, under the guise of protecting the community.

What community notifications really do is poison the targets environment, and often not only socially annexing the target, but opening the target to unspeakable harassment by the community at large. These notifications are in many cases treated the same way notifications about violent offenders and other predators are treated, it puts the community into a frenzy, and the target is treated as a pariah in many cases.

Once the community receive the notification, they often start to monitor and follow the target around. Many will even gaslight the target and other subtle, and not so subtle forms of harassment in an attempt to remove the target from the environment. Thus Gang Stalking is also referred to as community mobbing, taken to the extreme. This practice not only disrupts the life of the target, it's fully capable of destroying the targets life. Because the notifications are systemic, they follow the target everywhere they go, every new job that they apply for, every new association that the target tries to form is poisoned by these notifications.

In the case of Damon Thompson he reports having made many complaints of harassment by both student and staff alike. Though he did not receive any help, student affairs reports that he was known to them. In cases similar to his, what has been known to happen to others is that the continued complaints about staff and students is not used as a learning opportunity to address mobbing on campus, or in the workplace, but is used to classify the person complaining and seeking help as mentally unwell. In similar cases, targets have had files opened, and been placed on notifications, which then increases the level of harassment the target experiences. Then due to the notification, further complaints by the target are treated as a sign of mental illness, rather than a cry for help, as they are further targeted in their environment.

Damon Thompson became violent and attacked a fellow student. He was arrested, and will likely go to jail. The fellow student he attacked a Katherine Rosen who did recover, but reports from an overseas paper report that he had made several complaints against her in the past. When the U.S. media reported the same story, they reported it as an unprovoked attack, and said that the student had just snapped for no apparent reason.

sources close to him and his family indicated that prior to this incident he had made countless complaints against classmates and this specific lab partner but with no results. Contrary to US media reports, Thompson did know Rosen who was his lab partner and who has been very offensive to him on previous occasions and even the day in question. Now UCLA in an attempt to shift blame away from itself has sought to discredit the mental stability of Thompson by using his many complaints by e-mail as an indication of instability.

But according to KTLA news, a professor who taught Thompson said he told a university administrator he was worried about the student's mental health 10 months ago. UCLA history professor Stephen Frank, who taught him Western civilization late last year admits that Thompson sent him several emails complaining that classmates sitting around him had been disruptive and made offensive comments to him while he was taking a written exam and even accused the Professor of taunting him.

8

What many individuals are unaware of is that the very act of seeking out aid and assistance for workplace mobbing, or harassment, can be used against the person complaining to make it seem as if they are mentally unstable.

One e-mail stated "I believe I heard you, Professor Frank, say that I was 'troubled' and 'crazy' among other things," Thompson wrote. "My outrage at this situation coupled with the pressure of the very weighted examination dulled my concentration and detracted from my performance."

Frank said he was present during the entire exam, that Thompson sat in the front row and that he saw nothing to support the student's complaints. Frank said he was told that other professors had reported similar exchanges with Thompson, who complained he was taunted by other students -- in class, the dorms, dining areas and the library. A university official told Frank that he could only suggest that Thompson seek treatment, but they couldn't require him to seek psychological help. "My concern was in the context of other violent incidents on campuses around the country," Frank said.

Sources close to his family explain that Thompson frequently spoke with his mother and complained about the many things student had done to him and the names he was called even by the female students. However, they explain that the problem had to be extreme for Thompson to have reacted so violently

8

It seems that in some democratic countries similar psychiatric reprisal practices have been in place for the last 40 years or more. While many were pointing the finger at countries such as the former Soviet Union and China, many democratic countries were subtle implementing policies, practices, and procedures that were almost as harsh as those practices in none democratic countries. It seems for the last few decades the occupational health and safety laws have been used in a way similar to how the laws were used in the former Soviet Union. As early the 70's there were reports of these laws being used to target whistleblowers and those who did not get along with their boss.

For change to happen and the abuses within the system to stop, the media, must be willing to report the abuses, like they were when these abuses happened in other countries. Society must wake up to the reality that we are using occupational health and safety laws, not always to protect society, but to target dissenting voices in many cases. To target those who are different, those who stand out, those who are still willing to complain, or fight for what they believe in.

With the future changes to the DSM rules and regulations, democratic countries could well wittingly or unwittingly be exactly where the former Soviet Union was just a few short years ago. Targeting perfectly sane, perfectly healthy productive members of society and declaring them as mentally ill to fit an a state and corporate agendas. A society where everyone is the same is not a creative, productive, or forward momentum society and eventually such societies do not remain productive for very long. The people just loose the will, when everyone is the same. When everyone is forced to think the same, act the same, and individuality, eccentricities, or differences are legislated, medicated, or socialized away.

1. http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=d242g51470r84388&size=largest

2. http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/30/1/131.pdf

3. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1251309/Psychiatrists-want-angry-mental-illness-How-utterly-mad.html#ixzz0p5GCoaKQ

4. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/feb/10/diagnostic-statistical-manual-proposals

5. http://www.naturalnews.com/028762_children_disorders.html

6. http://www.naturalnews.com/028803_psychiatry_disease.html

7. http://www.harassment101.com/Article5.html

8. http://www.guardian.bz/component/content/article/53-headlines/842-belizean-stude%20nt-at-ucla-facing-attempted-murder-charges

Truth

Truth

Maybe people don't have truth, because they are not willing to fight for the truth. I have spent the last several years researching Gang Stalking, and finally coming to what I think is close enough to the truth, to put a name on what is happening.

Usually in a society when a truth is revealed, and a wrong is uncovered such as what has been happening to targets, other elements would come forward to support this initiative, to further help support the truth that is uncovered, and to help right the wrongs that are being done. You see this with stories about executions that are happening in wars zones, or civilians that are being illegally killed or murdered. The little that society can do in these cases they do. They discuss it, they talk about it, the media prints articles, and though it does not fix what is wrong, it does not make it right, at least the injustice is exposed.

I have also been trying to expose an injustice for the last several years, with varying degrees of success. Eg. I find that some forums, some communities are more open and familiar with the idea and the concept. I find that on others forums, they are less familiar with the concept, and the more mainstream they are, they frantically rush to try to deny the truth, delete the truth, or close down the truth. I see a controlled society and controlled people everyday. I see the slaves of the system, tightening the chains that bind them everyday, making sure those chains are more secure, and with those chains any chances of their freedom.

Throughout time people have come along and presented truth, usually with varying degrees of success. Some are killed for telling the truth, others jailed, some socially annexed, only to have those same people be praised later on when society is ready for the truths that they were telling in their time period. When society is not ready for the truth, it can be a very slow process for changes, but change can happen.

At one point America thought that owning slaves was a natural thing to do, now in today's society many people would think that human slavery is wrong. At one point in history many Germans thought they were doing the right thing for the fatherland by gathering up their neighbours, informing on them, and sending them out of the community, Germany in many ways has reflected on that time and decided it was wrong, but at the time, you would have been in the minority had you pointed out any differently, or been called a sympathizer. Germany would also again reflect on the Stasi era, and again many Germans would come to view that time period as a bad time in German history, although many others will never view their actions as wrong, and will never have any remorse for what happened during that time period. The same is true for the American McCarthyism, and Cointelpro periods, yet at the time while these events were happening, had you tried to speak out against them, you would again have been in the minority, or even been called a sympathizer.

What history has shown me is that during those time periods, people often collectively believe in the rightness of those actions. Those who disagree, or speakout due to conscience often share the same fate as those they try to help, but for some it's the only choice. This was apparent during the internment of the Japanese, and recently with the deportation of thousands upon thousands of middle eastern Americans and their children, with 9/11 terrorism as the justification. It's a continuous cycle that each generation goes through. Each must once again learn and reflect on the lessons from the past. Each must make the same mistakes, come to the same consensus, and then take corrective actions. This type of consensus usually takes years, and depending on how deep the scare on the human psyche was it can even take decades to heal, or for that truth to come to light. During those dark periods, unspeakable acts often occur, at the time the society often feel that these actions are justified, and are what they need to do to protect themselves. They gladly sacrifice freedom for a false sense of security and are willing to do the same or worst to others. From the inside this seems very sane very rational, when viewed from the outside this collective insanity is often viewed quite differently, but it is what it is.

Change is often a very slow and painful process, what has to happen when a society has been deeply conditioned is that the elements in that society that were conditioned have to become irrelevant and a new generation with a different mentality has to take it's place. Some societies can change in mid stream, this did happen to a degree in South Africa, with Apartheid and the attitudes that perpetuated it, but again change if often very slow, and can take years.

With Gang Stalking, I am trying to streamline the process as much as possible. Concepts such as mobbing and bullying, took a decade or more to finally become implanted in society. Where talking about mobbing was seen as a fringe subject, it's now mainstream. Where targets of mobbing were thought to be mentally having a breakdown or ill, it's now commonly recognized that this practice is wrong, and the targets are even winning lawsuits in courts of law. Exposure and awareness is happening for Gang Stalking as well, but it's still remains a very slow process. Unlike the other forms of systemic harassment, this form of harassment has the seal of approval from the state, and thus getting this exposed within society is going to be a much more involved process. There are legal aspects to consider, some people may want to speak out, but might feel socially as well as legally pressured not to. This has to change. The same sorts of unacceptable outcomes are happening to targets of Gang Stalking that happen to targets of bullying, mobbing. The process is working much like the Stasi system did in Germany or the Cointelpro system did in America and that is unacceptable.

I believe that change happens when people are ready for that change to happen, when they have had enough and they say enough is enough. When they storm the bastille in France, or the German embassy and take down the wall. I know in Germany this process took 40 years or more for people to finally reclaim what was theirs and to this day, the scares of that time period remain. Chance can be slow and painful, especially when it's something that is systemic and something that is ingrained in each generation. Truth can come to light however, it did with the exposure of the abuses that were happening within the Catholic Church. After years of silence, truth finally came to light, but at the sacrifice of the victims and so many of their supporters. 20 years ago, suggesting a priest had committed such an offence, would likely have resulted in being annexed from society, now today it's common knowledge that such does happen, and it's openly discussed. Part of the conspiracy of silence has been exposed. The same can happen with Gang Stalking and this system, but people have to want it to.

The information is there, the truth is out there, you can point to it, discuss it, link to it, but what I can't do for you is make you free to use it. You have to want that in your own time period. You have to want that freedom, and do something to earn it. People are just not as willing today as they were 40 to 50 years ago. We are as usual happy to have others go to war for freedoms. Most are willing to have others sacrifice, so that they can stay free. Many talk a good talk, but never follow it through with any actions. Many have tried to point the way to freedom, and fallen by the wayside for their efforts. As long as the slavery and the chains that bind are more comfortable, or seem more secure than the need to fight for freedom, and to expose the system that is binding, then this system will remain. As long as people are just comfortable enough, then all efforts will be in vain, and that is not fair, and that is not right. I think there is a point where you do what you can for others, but at some point those people that you are fighting for have to do something for themselves. Freedom is a choice, even if it's just in your mind.

This is the way that it's always been done, and thus it continues, but if for some reason, the way things have been done, no longer works, then I encourage you to think about making a change. Small changes here and there, but take some ownership, some responsibility, be an agent of the change that you want. Till then I grow tied of hearing about outside elements that are keeping others enslaved. Do I think other factors exist, yes, but I think one of the biggest factors are the people at ground level, and their willingness to go along with what is happening. Till it get's uncomfortable enough, people will not change. I find that the groups most willing to accept these ideas and to discuss them, are the groups at the farthest fringes of society. Maybe it's because these groups that are excluded from society, or not considered to be mainstream, have felt the chains of oppression a little more than others? Will change only then happen when others feel the same levels of oppression? Is this just a continuous cycle that human society goes through in every time period? Is this just something that each generation must continually relearn, or can they see the truth, before the final chain of oppression closes in? I don't have the answer to these questions. History can teach a lot, but I have to believe that each time period has to answer for it's own unique actions. Has to be accountable for it's own choices and decisions. History can guide, and be a great teacher, but only if people are willing to learn those lessons, or appreciate what has gone before.

Till then there is hope. Hope that society will wake up, take a look at it's actions, the system that it's a part of and decide if it's time for change, or decide that that system is really working, and that they want it to continue. In effect, change can happen, but only if you want it to happen, when the time is right for that change to happen. When the whisper of one, becomes the scream of many. Till then there will just be this void, this silence, knowing that something is terribly wrong with this system, but being willing to do little about it. Till then I remain prayerful and hopeful, but I am also a realist, and I do know what human history is like.

Gangs and their secrets

The informants can also be compared to a gang and how a gang functions. I have compared them to cults, gangs, secret societies, etc. It’s all the same. Members who keep a code of silence.

There are many gangs in society but this is the main one, and it comprises all of the smaller gangs or minor ones. So it incorporates, government branches, the cops, the Mafia, street gangs, masons, Scientologist, black activists, kkk, store owners, company workers, almost every religious sect you can think of. Every sector of society takes part. I don’t think I can make this any clearer. As much as they might all pretend not to get along, when the state comes calling, they will communicate together in public, and they are unified when it comes to their informant system.

Gangs rely on silence, so ofcourse this relies on silence. The snitches don’t want their I feel special club exposed.

Scientologist have Scientology, Masons have Masonry, and the snitches have this. This is their gang, their cult, their secret club. They feel special being a part of this. So yes the secrecy is a big part. They get so upset realising that outsiders know. They like this cause it makes them feel connected, belonging, like any gang or cult would. The mafia is one type of gang, so are the cops, so are street gangs, and the members join for different reasons. Many clubs have secrets, that the members are expected to uphold.

The cops, informants, and gangs use one handed sign languages. http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/category/one-handed-sign-language/

Where the cops and street gangs wear uniforms or matching colors, the informants often look like average people for the most part.

Some Gangs, some cults, some cops, some informants do underhanded things. There have been many cases where members of these groups have been caught doing illegal, immoral things.

Some Gangs, some cults, some cops, some informants are corrupt. There have been cops caught dealing drugs, informants caught in huge lies that destroy lives, cults have been known to do corrupt things as well. I think most targets are familiar with the corrupt actions of some of the informants.

Some Gangs, Some cults, some cops, some informants , use lies, bullying, intimidation, and fear to control their members. There are informants that want to speak out, but they are controlled by fear in some cases. They are lied to in others, and in some cases feel that it’s their patriotic duty to keep the secret. We have seen via gang stalking all of the above methods used to try to control and destroy the lives of targets.

The only thing with gang stalking is that it takes all the cults, gangs, cops, informants, and they are all part of one big gang. One big conspiracy of silence, and because so many people take part, many who realise what is going on lie to themselves. They believe that they are part of something that is good, nobel, protecting the city. They take part following orders instead of thinking. They pretend that this is normal, some of them see it as a good thing. To wake up to the truth that this is not normal, would shatter their reality. Many see it as power, rather than the enslavement that it truly is. To realise they are slaves, might mean doing something about it.

Many like the sense of belonging, sense of community, many on the inside don’t see things the way we do. They like the power, the connectedness, that feeling of finally fitting in, having a purpose. That is what keeps this going, and they don’t want their little secret club to be exposed.

Many people complain about cops and their blue wall of silence, or that gang members won’t snitch, or about how Masons, and other cults keep secrets, but then they turn around and they do the same thing. They keep secrets. They tell lies to keep their secrets safe. Their are hundreads of targets online saying that they are being abused by this system, but the cult/gang members still keep the secret. Then get made at other clubs or cults who do the same. It’s no different. They have their secret handshakes, you have your sign language.

Lies, manipulation, bullying, murder are used to keep your little system going just like any other. People who like these smaller gangs, cults, clubs, for the most part like this bigger one, cause the same things that allowed them to keep the secrets, tell the lies, do the damage, or destruction for these smaller clubs is what will cause them to do the same for this bigger club.

Gangs like their secrets, and they are willing to lie, bully, harass, intimidate, or destroy the innocent to keep these secrets. The informants in many cases are no different.

The Gang Stalking File

The case against me and what I understand of it.


The gangstalking file.


http://www.workplacebullying.org/2009/05/14/uk-green2/

[quote]The largest part of the award is the £640,000 awarded for future loss of earnings and a pension, and it is this portion which marks the case out as unusual.

“We have seen cases like this before a number of times but the court has awarded such a large amount because it took the view that this person would not be able to work at this salary level for a long time in the future,” said Tom Potbury, a lawyer specialising in employment law at Pinsent Masons.

Green, 36, had said she was subjected to “offensive, abusive, intimidating, denigrating, bullying, humiliating, patronizing, infantile and insulting words and behavior” and subjected to crude and lewd comments from her former colleagues. Her colleagues would move her papers, hide her post and remove her from document circulation lists. She alleged that some of the colleagues had ignored and excluded her, that her personal and professional authority was undermined, and her workload increased to unreasonable and arbitrary levels.

Her lawyer said medical experts on both sides of the case agreed that Green developed a major depressive disorder, but there was disagreement about its cause.

Deutsche Bank said it had not breached its duties to Green and denied that she was bullied, saying she had had a predisposition to mental illness. Deutsche Bank paid for stress counselling and assertiveness training for Green but she had a nervous breakdown before returning to work and suffering a relapse.[/quote]


I have read the above case scenario several times. It's funny because the workplace mobbing that I encountered was very similar in some regards to some of the things that went on in this case. Instead of being on the winning end of a lawsuit, I am on this end of an investigation, which is being used to falsely used to portray me as mentally ill.

It's funny, someone is dehumanized and degraded for several years and they no longer wish to put up with it, or emotionally can not, and the employer in this case a bank wants to place all the blame on them.

Part of what I have been trying to do is better understand the mechanisms used to place me under this investigation. One that has continued for years.

What's happening to me goes back a really long time. As mentioned before, I first became aware of the actual Gang Stalking, about three years ago, but my workplace mobbing had gone on for several years before this.

At work I was in a similar situation where workplace mobbing was daily, it was continuous and it made it impossible for me to perform my job functions. I eventually filed a complaint with the human rights commission after trying to work things out with Human Resources.

Shortly after filing the complaint C. Coughlin from HR called me into the office, in the presence of my senior manager at the time and advised me that if I did not drop the complaint, I would be required to see a Dr Brown. If I however dropped the complaint, things would back to normal. This play was disgraceful, and dirty but not uncommon.

Apparently if you decide to stand up for your rights or blow the whistle you need to speak to someone, if you instead choose option b and drop the case against them, you are of sound mind and body. Fascinating how these companies work. They use these investigations to discredit and disenfranchise their enemies. They destroy people's lives to protect their own interests. That's the true purpose of human resources in these companies.


The harassment I was exposed to included slander, lies, derogatory comments, rumors, and a stimuli which was anchored to said rumour. The stimuli was what was used for the bulk of the harassment. Because I complained primarily about the stimuli, they used this to try to portray me as mentally ill.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1144462/Man-jailed-harrassing-elderly-neighbours-whistling-Addams-Family-theme-time-saw-them.html


[quote]
Leopold Wrobel harassed the pensioners for more than four years, making them feel like prisoners in their home.

His victims, Michael and Kathleen Sharpe, said Wrobel had 'nearly succeeded' in destroying their lives.

Wrobel, 51, had been handed an anti-social behaviour order last December for harassing the couple.

But a court heard his nuisance behaviour, which had already lasted for four years, continued on the day the order was imposed.

The court was shown CCTV footage from cameras on the Sharpes' property, which picked up Wrobel's repeated whistling when they arrived at or left the house.

Michael Treharne, prosecuting, said each incident taken in isolation would probably seem silly or almost pathetic.
Leopold Wrobel taunted the elderly couple with the Addams Family theme tune

Leopold Wrobel: He taunted the couple

But he added: 'If something happens on an ongoing basis and goes on and on and on, eventually it reaches the stage of being absolutely intolerable.'

Mr Sharpe, from Wingerworth in Derbyshire, told the court Wrobel's behaviour had made his wife ill and she had started losing her hair.

'It's been devastating and it's done what he wanted to do, to try to destroy our lives,' the 68-year-old said. 'He very nearly succeeded.'

His wife told magistrates they could not leave the house without Wrobel being there. [/quote]


This couple was harassed using a stimuli, in this case the Addams family theme. It was one man, against this couple, but he managed to almost ruin their lives. In my case, I was one person, and about 80% of the peope I worked with, including most of the managers were taking part in what was ongoing. I worked with about 130 people at the time.

The very things that I complained about, at the time and filed the human rights complaint about are some of the very things individuals are now winning court cases over currently, yet in my case, it's being used to portray me as crazy, and keep a fake investigation ongoing.


Part of what I complained about is that a manager, let's call him "hateman the hitman saw", who was currently working in the same company that I was, had years earlier at a different company started a derogatory rumour about me. I stated in the complaint that I felt that this rumour had continued onto my current job.

Since I was once again working with this person, I had reasonable grounds to believe that this person was helping to fuel the flames of this degrogatory rumour, once again. I had grounds to believe it, because I heard back that this was the case. The bulk of my complaint focused on the fact that the derogatory rumours/comments had been anchored to a stimuli, and said stimuli was being used on a daily basis to make it impossible for me to perform my job functions. Eg. If the stimuli had been keys jangling, you would have the people directly around me, jangling keys for the whole shift, on several occasions, I had customers asking me about the noise in the background.

Sounds pretty simple right, not so simple, since the workplace decided to go along with what was happening.

After researching this, what I now know is that the stimuli and my reaction to it were deliberately created. I had worked with someone at the first job who was in the military. He had tried to sensitise me to three stimuli. I didn't know it at the time, that it was deliberate, but I do now. The other stimuli was pens clicking, and the actual stimuli which I became sensitive to.

What I also now know is that James, and "Hateman The Hitman Saw", were both part of the snitching friends network. What James did with the anchoring of the stimuli was deliberate. What I don't know is if he did this on his own accord, or if in fact this was more deliberate than that. James outside of work did have military connections, so I don't have the answer to this yet.


The other thing that was happening at that time is the same tactic was being used outside of the workplace to harass me in public. I was aware of this, but I was not aware of the snitching friends network.

So what you have is a target that has been deliberately sensitised. A corrupt company that wants to keep the target quite and stop them from going forward with a human rights complaint. I am not saying that this company is the only place an investigation could have originated from, because I have reason to believe that this might have started years before this, but I do believe that they used my complaint to the human rights commission to try to portray me as mentally ill, when really I was being harassed, and any actions I took to protect myself from being harassed day in and day out were fully justified. I will also state that the harassment was happening outside of the workplace, and the same applies.

So the target is aware that they are being harassed and a stimuli is being used. What they do in the course of these investigations is they try to incite and instigate incidents to further the perception of mental illness, or whatever the target is being billed as. If the target is being billed as a racist, they try to encourage negative interactions with persons of different races. If they are being billed as homophobic, they try to encourage negative interactions with people who are homosexual, if the target is being billed as a terrorist, they try to portray the target as such and make their actions look suspicious.

Since I have been targeted, they have tried the mentally ill angle several times and several different ways. I am aware that one incident that happened recently involved my handing out activism material to a group in a small cafe, about 7 people. I decided to try some viral activism, so I very impromptu handed out some papers directing the informants to visit one of the Gang Stalking websites. I mean I get people coming up to me all the time handing me flyer's for clubs, and other events, or their activism materials so I don't see the difference. However my understanding is that they are using me handing out what I consider essentially activism material to further the myth of mental illness. Right because naming informants as such and directing them to Gang Stalking websites is insane? Right. I really have to wonder about the shrills that they are using to make these types of assessments and then further disenfranchise targets?

They could in essence use a simple incident such as this and use it to get employers current to flag you. Yet is not activism what I do on a daily basis? Why should my handing out activism material be seen or evaluated any differently than anyone else?

When they can't prove that you are crazy, the scope of the investigation might shift. It's what I call a fishing expedition. Remember these investigations are often the life blood for many. The informants get a bit of money, lot's of men get construction jobs, and they use these investigations to push targets to the edge, hoping that when they do snap, they will have further proof that the informant network is doing a good job. So every time they can put a target in a mental hospital, get them behind bars, to kill themselves or others, or just attack someone, this gives them cause, and in some cases additional funding, so it's in their best interest to make you look crazy.

Recently what some informants did is that they started a group with a list of people. Many on that list did not ask to be on that list, but they started sending out emails. In those emails they used some racist or other language that might be cause for an investigation. So for example you find yourself a part of this list, which is in effect a group. You don't say anything wrong, but others in the group do, surprise, you might find yourself being investigated, because you now belong to a group spewing hate speech. The hate speech will ofcourse have been provided by the informants themselves, but what does that matter?

I had another incident where I was in the park. I had put up with 20 minutes of some idiot informant doing stupid dogs tricks while trying to keep an eye on me. Normally if you were not aware of what was happening it would not be that irritating, but it was. I was grateful when the dog boy left, and was just getting comfortable, when yet another informant showed up, this one even worst than the first, because he just stood there and stared. Well I had it, and I just gave him a glaring look before reaching into my case to get something. I had just gotten some groceries and was pretty tired, and just wanted to sit there without being disturbed.

The next thing I know, the little man pansy is running across the park like a bat out of hell, and I am thinking what the heck? I have been known to give some pretty squelching looks, but I didn't think I was that good. Next thing I know before I leave the park, there is a helicopter that literally accompanied me home on my walk from the park, and for the next two months I would become acquainted with what I call airstalking.

When I got home, the serve your drug sentence as an informant neighbour above me, decided to make contact with the neighbour below. Suddenly all friendly, can I come and hang out? This neighbour had never spoken to me before. All this other stuff and I am thinking what the heck? Apparently I came to find out that, man pansy, who ran out of the park like a bat out of hell, seems to have given them the impression that I had wires in my case, (which I did for an electronic device, I think a battery charger), and therefore maybe a bomb or incendiary device? So upstairs neighbour was just making sure I didn't blow myself and him up, and the suddenly friendly Susan above me, as I call him, was just trying to get into my apartment to look around. Well that makes sense.

Now what really get's me here is all it takes is the word of a snitch. They don't have to be logical, or truthful, they can make up anything. Now to be fair to man pansy, I don't know if he did it to be spiteful because I gave him a squelching look, or if he really believed I was dangerous, and I really don't care. These people are told the target is crazy, or what have you, and normal behaviour that would normally never be questioned suddenly becomes oh did you see that, the target blinked, what do I do, what does that mean? They are irrational and dangerous.

The other problem is positive identification. There have been so many times where I know that I was flagged as someone at a location doing xyz, and I was not. If I could see my file, I am sure I would find several incidents that were attributed to me to make me look crazy, and were not in fact me, but the way these investigations work is that you are guilty, and you never get a chance to prove your innocence.

I have seen so many times where they give the signal that I am away from home, which means that they are following someone else somewhere, and this means that if there is an incident, it will be ascribed to me, and it will not be me. I have been on the train and other locations where they have the wrong target, but they are provoking someone else and I have seen the other person react. Yet this will be ascribed to me.

Corrections will never be made, because the target is not allowed any input whatsoever and most of this is based on the word of informants, staged incidents which are designed to make the target look like anything you want them to look like, pedophile, drug dealer, racist, homophone, crazy, you name it, they can stage it.

The other question I have is about the types of psychiatrists or professionals that are being used. Based on what I saw in regards to the articles that they wrote about Gang Stalking online, you have people trying to write a whole entire community off as mentally ill, when in fact these investigations are on going. Then when that does not work, you write them off as extremists or conspiracy theorists. Yet everything that has been stated just about, has been proven, by external sources. If the same types of people are being used to remotely diagnose targets as crazy, we should be very worried.

As it is, they have been investigating me for years. I was never crazy. I was being harassed. Because I choose to stand up for myself and take the company to the commission, HR used it as an opportunity to open an investigation when I failed to comply with the threat of dropping the suit. Since that time, I have been openly harassed, had my communications interfered with, had several staged incidents, some involving me, many not involving me, but all used to further portray me as mentally ill. I have never been allowed to see my file, or directly address any of the said incidents that would be used to portray me as mentally ill.

Normal activity such as handing out activism material has been used to portray me as mentally ill, keep in mind, I have never had anyone tell me that they did not want something being handed to them. So if this is the case, how can an incident be used against me? Further how can said incident be used to further try to disenfranchise me from employment?

What I do know is we have a very corrupt system. Many informants see about 15-30 minutes of skits and harassment that is running in a targets life 24/7. They perform their surveillance. The ones below me, play human target with my body, often using lasers, radar gun, pulse weaponry, what have you to burn my skin from the apartment below. They still try to do the sleep deprivation thing when they can, much of this by a human rights stand point would be considered torture, and against the law.
These people feel that it's ok to perform such actions on targets that they have been told are mentally ill, or rapists, pedophiles, drug dealers, users, prostitutes etc, because these groups are seen as less than human, they don't feel that their actions are immoral, or unethical. They think that what they are doing is just fine.

Lastly again these investigations are the life blood of these programs. I had one person tell me that he was offered a construction job. Person had been sent to befriend me. The construction job was to be the benefit. They hire a lot of these people and they put a lot of money into the area around the target where the surveillance is happening and unfortunately these perks makes a targets community more likely to go along with, and take part in the harassment. Remember for the community doing the harassment/surveillance, they are often having the time of their lives, in some cases. They are working together, some feel like they are James Bond, it's fun for some of them, so fun, that they forget that their is a human being on the other side of the door, as was apparent with the maintenance guy who was so caught up in his role of being informant, that he forgot that the target has rights and the target is not ascribing to their mental pathology.

I have said it before and I will say it again, these people in many cases are not smart, many don't realise that they are being used to set people up and destroy lives. Lives like Jiverly Wong, Kimveer Gill and many others. When the target kills themselves or shoots others, they see it as proof that the target really was mentally ill, and not proof that their harassment drove the target to the end result. They then feel that they did a good job, that they are valuable and relevant and they continue on as before, feeling more justified than ever.

I also suspect that they have the odd staged incident that also further serves to justify the informant network, and the incidents further serve to make them think that what they are doing is valuable and relevant. When I researched the Stasi, many had been a part of the Stasi by choice and not by force and even after the Stasi fell, they did not see a problem with what they had done. In Hitler's Germany it was the same as well, with many enjoying a sense of corporation, neighbourliness, not seeing anything wrong or malignant in their actions, they were just following orders, or the laws of the land. It's the same for our informants.

Thus targets are guilty, we will never be proven innocent because we never get to see our files. The evidence gathered is staged in many cases, normal incidents that would not be questioned if it was done by someone else not under investigation, are being used to further justify their cases against us. When they fail to find proof for one aspect of the investigation, they set up other incidents, go on fishing expeditions and claim the scoop of the investigation has changed. This is used to continue these investigations indefinitely. Remember I recently spent time studying the extremist community, the informants are now trying to set up incidents to portray me as someone that I am not. Think about how this works if you are being investigated as a pedophile. You are likely to get emails containing kiddy porn from you friendly neighbourhood informants, and then the other informant monitoring your internet connection is likely to just focus on the content of that email. Or like the other example that I gave, these groups that you join, or that people add your email to, you have to watch what is being said, because they could use that to change the scope or add to the scope of the investigation.

If you spend anytime reading about how the police are abusing the informant system, then you might begin to have some idea of what we are up against, and then might be able to better protect yourself and others from these deliberate investigations, which have no end, and are continually staged to paint the targets in the worst light, real or imagined.

Is this democracy? No I don't believe it is, but this system has been like this for some time, and as it spreads more are likely to be affected by it, so it's very important that people become aware of how the system is operating and functioning so they can try to avoid some of the pit stops associated with it.