Impasse. Open Secret

Impasse/Open Secret.

I have said this before, but I will say this again. What is happening is no longer a secret. This is now an open secret, everyone knows about it, but no one says anything about it.

So it's not as if what is happening to targets is a secret. Even though the mainstream media has not exactly broken the story, the story is broken, it is out there. Now some even with all the evidence will continue to sing the same song, oh targets are crazy, but enough of you now know, are aware, and are part of the secret club, so that you can understand that a lot of what has been presented is truth.

So I am having a Gary Webb moment, perhaps bad example to use, but all I mean by this is, I have broken this story, it's big, and I expect the media to come and take up the story. I expect people to be grateful for the truth, (I really don't), but even if the mainstream would not cover this, I have spent the last four years online hearing about how the mainstream hides the truth, how we are being lied to, how there is a conspiracy, and that it seeks to harm us, well know what, I have just given you a conspiracy, told you the truth, and tried to help not just targets, but others.

Is the none mainstream rushing to share and publish the story, are they rushing to make sure the truth comes to light? No they are doing exactly what the mainstream does, or what they first did with the Mai Lia Massacre or what they totally did with the Gary Webb story. It's all out there, people know, but no one in authority, no one responsible, and even most on the lower levels will do anything about it. This is why truth does not get revealed, this is why conspiracies exist. Often they are not dark little secrets that no one knows about, no in fact they are often open secrets that happen in pockets, with sometimes thousands, upon thousands being aware, but feeling bound to silence or secrecy.

Impasse. I think I have done most of what I set out to do, as far as discovering what was happen, getting the concept more normalized, but getting it fully exposed takes a village. I know the members of this village have first been silenced, unable to speak. I also know that many have given their loyalty and allegiance to this system, but if you don't speak the truth, get this revealed then who will?

I don't expect anyone to break the law exactly, but there are often cleaver ways of doing things if you wish to do them. I am ok with writing the articles, and doing the research that I can do, in fact if I could find a way, I would spend most of my time doing research, yes I am boring that way, but I find it fun.

Anyways so I am at an impasse, I have done what I was suppose to do for the most part. I even figured out a couple of other conspiracies along the way. Speaking of which, the civilian spy force are now clear on this right. You are what will be the heart and soul of the surveillance network that is formed? It's happening slowly, and quietly, you are being bound in secrecy, so you can not speak of it, but this New World Order is being built on the backbone of this civilian force army. You in your communities, villages, and hamlets, you are who will be the handmaids of the New World Order, their eyes, their ears, their hands. A global, one world, surveillance, society. You will punish their enemies, you will systemically help to remove them, and you will believe that you are doing it for good, that it is something that must be done, should be done. The state wills it and it will be so. This is no different than in any other time period, and most will never see it for the evil that it is. This is the truth, wither you will believe it or not is another story, but there it is. Open Secret, and my impasse.

I remain prayerful. I think in times such as this, that is what you can do. Anyways I am not sad, or discouraged, I am just like, ok this is what it is. I realise that people have to wrap their minds around this. I have now had years, and most are just starting to wrap their minds around this, so I am going to leave you with this to mull over, send out good wishes, and come back to it and see what you say. In the meantime, if anyone out there in society has any good ideas, please feel free to leave a comment.


Thanks,

How the system is working

This is a brief summary for targets still trying to grasp what might have happened and how their lives wound up in this place. Using some of these occupational health and safety/mental health laws, to the best of my knowledge workplaces, civil officials and others, can have a another official, deem a person as a danger to themselves or others. In more severe cases they might even go so far as to try to list you as gravely disabled, as they did with Britney Spears.

They can do this all behind your back. Health officials can declare you a danger to yourself, others, suffering from a mental illness, or even gravely disabled, based on the information provided to them by a third party. The third party does not even have to be the one initiating the complaint. However if you are fully functioning, they would have a hard time committing you, as we saw with the Lindsay Lohan case, who did not meet the criteria for a 5150 hold, but they apparently did suggest it. I think since she has obtained a lawyer, they have not been so bold to try this again.

Here is an example of such a senario. Eg. A employer wants to get rid of an employee who has been consistently complaining, they suggest they see a company paid psychiatrist.

http://www.harassment101.com/Article5.html

Under existing laws in some countries, states, etc. They can suggest but can not force a person to. What they can do however is add a lot of stuff to your file. They might even use evidence from the very individuals that you are making the complaint against, making it look as if you are the problem. This has been well documented by the mobbing community so I don't think that I have to re-document this.

Once they bring your file often to one of their company paid psychiatrists, community health and safety review boards, university threat assessment teams, etc, they can then list you as a danger, or suffering from a mental illness. They can do that based on the criteria that says you are unable to function cause you are mentally impaired on how you are perceiving the things around you, or showing a degradation.

Once they list you as mentally ill, a danger to yourself or others, you are then placed on the lists. These lists act the same way the pedophile lists act. If you are walking through a community, the phone rings they get a call, dangerous, or mentally ill person in the area. Remember in many cases, you will not be aware of the drastic steps your employer, spouse, parent, civil authority, or others has taken. The only thing you will be aware of is the sudden harassment and community surveillance. As we have seen, when you try to complain about it and report it, they use this to say that you are suffering from a mental illness. The reality is the target is being systemically harassed and destroyed. This is being used as a means of retaliation by employers, civil workers in the community and others.

So those around you get contacted, told not to say anything, and ofcourse the useful idiots around you assume that it's true, most act accordingly, which just makes your situation worst. You can then add in the fact that you might still be experiencing the original situation of harassment that you were in, when you made the complaint, this was the situation with the Damon Thompson case. Then any further attempts you make to get help or assistance for legitimate harasment that might still be happening, and which is likely to have escalated, is just viewed as further signs of your mental degredation.

In the Damon Thompson case, he did end up lashing out. This is then used to show that the diagnosis was correct, but the reality is much like workplace mobbing targets who lash out, there is more to the story. The reality is that listing an innocent person as mentally ill, is likely to be a catch 22, or self fulfilling prophecy. The listing ensures that the harassment gets multiplied, and thus often brings about more severe outcomes.

The listings of course cause the community to go into overdrive. Oh no a mentally ill person amongst us, we can't have that, and they do perform the harassment behaviours that targets have listed. Remember they will use all the tactics that they would use against pedophiles against targets, and then some, but what has been documented is a deliberate campaign of harassment. Organized, orchestrated, including gaslighting, subtle harassment. They do it, cause they think that you are mentally ill, no one will believe you, and as targets have documented, the police don't help, doctors, etc. They all use the listing to assume that you are mentally ill. Remember suggesting that there is a conspiracy against you, or that you are being tortured is a sign of mental illness, but the problem is that when someone goes behind your back, lists you as a danger to yourself, and others, or lists you as mentally ill, and tells everyone else but you, that is a conspiracy. Also when these citizen informants in the course of their monitoring use things like wicked lasers, or remote electronic monitoring devices to
surveil the target, and it harms the target, the target is fully correct in saying that they are being tortured. In both cases, this is what is happening with many targets, so under these circumstances the target is fully correct.

Again in most cases, you will likely have been wrongly assessed by some company shrill, salivating to do their masters bidding, or some equally panting community shrill. Maybe I am being harsh, and maybe some of these people really do make the only judgement that they can based on the lies that they are told. But when you are assessing someone based on one side of a story, that side being an employer, maybe family member with ulterior motives, civil employee, or other, there has to be more to go on before destroying someones life, but there is not.

Once you are listed and those around you are notified, most take advantage of the situation, any little conflict, they use it to paint you as a danger. Even where they is no conflict, we see stories getting made up, deliberate set up's, eg. Mentally ill looking individuals being in the same location where the target is, so that your oh so kind community members can call it in. Now remember the average person is told there is a mentally ill person in the area, sometimes they are given a description, sometimes it just vague. So they will look around for anything that looks crazy and report it. Behind the scenes, there is a deliberate effort happening, to ensure that such people are in locations where the target is, so that the reports can keep coming, remember at this stage there is a bit of funding that goes into this, and the more mentally ill people the better. Also they don't want it to come out that they are doing what they did in Russia, which is listing perfectly sane and healthy people as mentally ill, thus it's in their best interests to use the useful idiots around you to carry out their bidding.

Again calling people useful idiots is harsh. They are often lied to. They see information and are given information that looks real, they are in many cases lied to and most people are simple, basic, they can not understand or conceive of the type of conspiracy being used against targets, or believe that the state would go through so much effort for one person. What people have to understand is that this is not so much effort for one person. This is a system. A system that is already in place with these types of resources, so that one person is like an ant colony dealing with an errant fly, that get's into it's path. The network is already in place, already set up in each community, all they have to do is point, click, tell the people whom to hate, and they do it. It's no more expensive to get rid of one person than it is 20 if the network is already in place.

So you have the situation that most targets wake up to find themselves in. Being hunted, targeted, and having no idea why. You have those around the target that have been advised of their mental illness, danger to society, status, and the society goes on this. You have the target realising that their is a conspiracy, and the community thinking the person is having a breakdown and "doing everything to see that the target gets the help that they need." A beautiful little symphony that usually results in the destruction of the target, by the malicious, or well meaning useful idiots around them.

The laws that are being used. Occupational Health and Safety, Workplace Violence Prevention, Mental health acts are where I am looking. This often starts in the community, work, school, etc, but once remotely evaluated, this goes into a couple of other areas. Mental health act laws, cause those in some cases are what are used, in other cases, it's occupational health and safety laws, depends on the situation. The distribution of information, to the wide and varied world falls under the privacy laws, and what the rights of the individual are vs, the community at large. Eg. Though you might have the right to alert those around a target that they are in immediate contact with, do you really have the right to alert someone in bora, bora, whom they will never have any physical contact with, but are doing business with? No, but they are using this to systemically poison the lives of targets. Using it to harass them online, to disrupt business dealings and associations, to systemically blacklist and blackball innocent people.

Civil action. This is where we might be able to sue, under civil laws, if the information that has been supplied is false, information leading to you further being listed as mentally ill, dangerous. If targets can then access Freedom Of Information files, there are records kept of complaints, then they can try to use this to sue for any false or inaccurate information. If anyone has made a false statement or testimony deliberately, then this is the clause that would allow you to sue. This seems to work for America, Canada, and there is a U.K. clause. I think the U.K. clause works for most of Europe and Australia's laws should be similar to laws governing the U.K.

So in getting proper assistance, you might want to ask for a lawyer that is skilled in privacy laws, labor laws, and mental health laws. Jane Clift was lucky, and targets have to be equally lucky to get the right assistance, or you will just be bounced around. Add to that that some lawyers are bound by the confidentiality of the program and might have a conflict of interest in discussing some of this information, and there you have it Bob's your uncle, more or less a basic set up to this system. I am not a lawyer, but from what I have been able to gleam with my many hours of research, this should be a ruff idea of how this is working.

The Psychiatric Reprisal. Part 2 & 3

Named: People who become very angry, like Mr. T in the A Team, could have 'intermittent explosive disorder'

Do you live surrounded by clutter - ancient copies of magazines, your children’s old toys, articles you’ve clipped out of newspapers over the years?

If you find it hard to throw out things of limited or no value, you could be suffering from hoarding disorder.

‘Hoarding’ is just one of the new mental conditions being added to the psychiatrists’ bible, or the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (DSM), to give it its proper name.

Other new conditions identified as possibly needing professional help include binge eating - which is said to affect many people who are seriously obese - and ‘cognitive tempo disorder’, which seems very like laziness (symptoms include dreaminess and sluggishness).

There’s also ‘intermittent explosive disorder’, which involves occasionally becoming very angry suddenly.

Most bizarre of the proposed additions is one defined as ‘getting a thrill at being outraged by pornography’.

3

It seems that those in the western world who do not fall in line and follow the norms that the society prescribes as normal, could soon be in for an experience similar to that of the former Soviet Union.

Childhood temper tantrums, teenage irritability and binge eating may soon rate as psychiatric disorders in the US, according to proposed changes to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, the bible of the psychiatric profession.

4

Things like childhood temper tantrums, teenage angst, and binge eating, might in today's society be unpopular, but are they worthy of being classified as signs of mental illness and possibly being drugged away?

Proposed changes to the U.S. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) could include reclassifying childhood temper tantrums, teenage angst, and binge eating as psychiatric disorders. If accepted, the proposals could equal billions of dollars in new revenue for pharmaceutical companies.

5

Is being antisocial really a sign of mental illness? Are these laws just designed to target those who do not fit into a future state agenda?

The new edition may include "disorders" like "oppositional defiant disorder", which includes people who have a pattern of "negativistic, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior toward authority figures." Some of the "symptoms" of this disorder including losing one's temper, annoying people and being "touchy".

Other "disorders" being considered include personality flaws like antisocial behavior, arrogance, cynicism or narcissism. There are even categories for people who binge eat and children who have temper tantrums.

Children are already over-diagnosed for allegedly being bipolar or having attention-deficit disorder (ADD), which results in their being prescribed dangerous antipsychotic drugs. To categorize even more childhood behaviors as psychiatric disorders will only further increase the number of children who will be needlessly prescribed antipsychotic drugs.

6

Is western society slowly implementing many of the same criteria that allowed Soviet psychiatrists to label many healthy individuals as mentally ill, just by following a criteria and trying to lump everyone into those criteria, and weeding out the ones who do not fit?

The APA panel is also suggesting adding a new condition category to DSM called "risk syndromes". People who are suspected to potentially be at risk for developing a mental disorder but do not yet have one would be deemed as having "psychosis risk syndrome". This category would include teenagers who exhibit "excessive suspicion, delusions and disorganized speech or behavior," for example.

The APA made it clear that its goal with the revisions is to diagnose people as early as possible with mental disorders, even before they actually have them, in order to get them on treatment.

6

If these risk syndromes are added to the new update, then you could be dealt with not for having a mental disorder, but just for having a factor that puts you at risk of having a mental disorder. You could be in treatment for just being suspected of potentially being at risk for developing a mental disorder.

"It not only determines how mental disorders are diagnosed, it can impact how people see themselves and how we see each other," Alan Schatzberg, president of the American Psychiatric Association, which publishes the guide, told reporters. "It influences how research is conducted as well as what is researched. It affects legal matters, industry and government programmes."

4

Might such factors already be affecting how we interact with each other? How we view each other? Are these criteria or similar being used to falsely diagnose individuals in western society as having a mental illness when they do not?

Cases

In the article giving workers the treatment, Peter Downs cites several cases of workers who complained and then were asked to see a psychiatrist. This is happening at thousands upon thousands of workplaces in many democratic societies. A condition of continued employment might even be based on such a forced encounter.

The first case sited in the article is that of Norm Crosty

On October 5, 1998, Norm Crosty sent a letter to the labor relationsdepartment at his plant. Crosty, for thirteen years an electrician at Ford Motor Company's Wixom, Michigan, assembly plant, complained that he could not do his job because so many of his bosses were taking the necessary equipment out of the plant to work on their homes or personal businesses.

The next day, the plant director of human resources invoked a Ford program for combating workplace violence to bar Crosty from the factory and ordered him to see a company-paid psychiatrist or lose his job.

7

In this case for making what was a very legitimate claim, the worker was not only barred from his place of employment, but was ordered to see a psychiatrist. The ford program for combating workplace violence, most likely falls under the occupational health and safety laws that have been used to target others.

A little more than fourteen months later, and 725 miles away, officials at Emory University cited a similar concern about violence to justify using armed guards to escort Dr. James Murtagh off university property when Dr. R. Wayne Alexander, chairman of the department of medicine at Emory, ordered him to see a company-selected psychiatrist or lose his job. Six weeks earlier, Murtagh, a professor of pulmonology at Emory, had filed a false claims suit against the university, alleging that it had misspent millions of dollars in federal grant money.

7

It seems that members of society who complain, blow the whistle, or assert their rights at work, are being targeted under these health and safety provisions. The laws were originally put in place to protect the rights of workers who have the right to a safe work environment, but it seems that they are increasingly used to silence those who continue to complain, blow the whistle, or file complaints. Many targets of workplace mobbing, who complain about it, or get angry about it, seem to be having warning markers or notifications placed on their files often without their knowledge or awareness.

Across the United States, companies have seized upon concerns about workplace violence to quash dissent. Hundreds of large corporations have hired psychiatrists and psychologists as consultants to advise them on how to weed out "threatening" employees. They say they are only responding to a 1970 directive from the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration that they maintain a "safe and secure work environment." But by drawing the definition of "threatening" as broadly as possible, they are giving themselves a new club to bang over the heads of workers.

Maria Buffa, a former salaried employee in the personnel department at Ford World Headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan, said she, too, was sent to a psychiatrist after she filed a sexual harassment complaint in February 1999 against a woman co-worker. "You think, maybe I am the problem, else why would they be sending me to a psychiatrist,"

7

This pattern of the state using psychiatrists to follow a set of diagnostic markers to access workers remotely, often without interviewing the workers is very similar to the pattern that was happening in the former Soviet Union, which allowed many innocent individuals to be falsely misdiagnosed.

As you might expect, the Postal Service, given its reputation for workplace violence, has bought into the psychiatric testing. Last September, Postal Service executives proposed to give line supervisors the right to order emergency psychiatric exams for employees who are argumentative. Unionists say this will jeopardize their ability to represent their members. "

Albanese admits there are some people who clearly need help, but he says the Postal Service has so broadened its definition of events that can trigger a mandatory exam that "it is very easy to tie someone up in that psychiatric situation." According to the APWU, "The following is a list of factors that a supervisor can consider when deciding whether or not to send an employee for a fitness-for-duty exam: significant increases in unscheduled absences, increased bathroom use, changes in behavior or work performance after lavatory or lunch breaks, deterioration in personal hygiene and/or cleanliness of the work location, inattention to work duties and progressive deterioration in concentration and memory, [and] threatening behavior. Supervisors can also impose emergency fitness-for-duty exams if an employee becomes argumentative, or shows an unusual interest in news stories or literature dealing with violence."

7

These could be people who also just do not enjoy their jobs very much. Unscheduled absences, increased bathroom use, changes in behavior or workplace performance. How many workplaces implement unpopular changes which drive some workers away from their normal job functions, or make the regular job functions so unbearable that they just do not wish to be in the environment? Lot's of companies do, thus many individuals at one point in their lives or another might fall into this criteria.

The web site for Michael H. Corcoran, Ph.D. & Associates, Inc., for example, asks: "Will the expert you consult be willing to render an opinion of dangerousness and be willing to put it in writing?" and "Will the expert be willing to do this without interviewing the subject personally?"

Some psychiatrists in the field doubt that any reliable judgment can be made without interviewing the subject.

7

Yet it seems that in the case of many individuals that is exactly what is happening. People are being assessed remotely, and yes some psychiatrists are diagnosing patients as mentally ill, schizophrenic, etc. They are then having warning markers placed on their files, placing them on notification lists, they are then subsequently followed around and harassed by the community at large. A practice that the Targeted Individual community has come to call and classify as Gang Stalking.

Speaking for himself, he says it is possible to tell if a worker is likely to become violent on the job, but not with 100 percent accuracy. But, he insists, "it will require more than just one session with the worker, and it will also require information from other sources close to the patient, including relatives, acquaintances in the neighborhood, work, etc." If a psychiatrist is evaluating someone who is already on the job, he says, "one measure to prevent mistakes is to require a second opinion. That would give the individual the option to appeal and have his or her own evaluator."

Unionists are skeptical of the objectivity of the psychiatrists the companies use. "We call them prostitutes, because they will write whatever the Postal Service wants them to," says Shirley McLennan, vice president of APWU Local 4 in Louisville, Kentucky, of the doctors who do fitness-for-duty exams.

7

What if the information is coming from hostile other sources, such as jealous neighbours, or even distant neighbours, hostile co-workers, and family who immediately assume that their relatives are mentally ill, just based on the criteria of being interviewed about wither their relative could be mentally ill?

Donald Soeken, a former U.S. Public Health Service psychiatric social worker who used to be in charge of giving fitness-for-duty exams, says the psychiatric exams almost always are shams. "The doctor will go into all the areas that could discredit a person," Soeken says. "He'll ask early life questions, late life questions, sexual questions, whatever he wants to ask, and then write it up and give it to the boss or law firm. Any doctor worth his salt will find something wrong, or even make up something, and if you don't answer one of his questions, then you are uncooperative and you can be fired for that, too. What they are trying to do is put a person out on a psychiatric disability. If they succeed, you would never work again in your lifetime."

Soeken is sometimes called the father of the fight against abusive fitness-for-duty exams. While doing such exams for federal employees at the Public Health Service's outpatient clinic in Washington, D.C., in 1978, he discovered that many of the people sent to him were either whistleblowers or people who had a personality clash with the boss. The employer making the referrals expected him to give them the ammunition to get rid of employees for mental health reasons.

7

Though not the exact same as being sent off to a Soviet Union state mental health facility, this practice could render a worker unable to work again. It could render a worker unfit to stay gainfully employed because they choose to blow the whistle, or had a disagreement with the boss. This practice in American society has been in place since at least the 1970, and similar practices are in other democratic countries.

After leaving the Public Health Service in 1994, Soeken established Integrity International to assist whistleblowers in the private sector. Since then, he has testified as an expert witness in seventy psychiatric reprisal lawsuits. Soeken warns anyone who will listen not to trust the company psychiatrist.

"If you assume the doctor is concerned about your health and well-being, you've made a deadly assumption," he says. "They are looking for any phrase or evidence they can use against you to stereotype you as schizophrenic, paranoid, or delusional."

7

This is why individuals who have never seen a mental health professional can be classified as delusional, schizophrenic, paranoid, etc, without ever having had a mental health exam. This can be done remotely. Remember this is not happening in the former Soviet Union, this is not happening in China, this is happening in democratic countries. America, Canada, The U.K., and many other democratic countries. Along with many none democratic countries.

Tom Devine, legal director for the Government Accountability Project. Often, another goal is to smear and discredit the employee. That, he said, is why psychiatric harassment "is unsurpassed in its ugliness."

In Crosty's case, a notice on the company bulletin board announced he had been expelled from the plant for psychiatric reasons. "It was very demeaning," says Crosty. With the help of an attorney, and after he was cleared by four different psychiatrists, he got his job back, but "I was totally discredited as some kind of kook and wacko," he says.

In Murtagh's case, administrators at Emory "spread a rumor that he could be armed and dangerous, and a terrorist threat," says Devine, whose organization has taken up Murtagh's defense.

7

These practicies are being used across democratic workplaces, educational facilities, and other areas of society. These practices are being used on unsuspecting members of society. It's being used to discriminate, silence, and destroy the lives on many innocent individuals. In addition to fit for duty exams, warning markers are being placed on files, citizens are being declared as having mental illnesses, in many cases without having ever been assessed by a health professional, and even if they are assessed, there is no guarantee of a fair assessment, in some cases these health professionals are going on rumours and hearsay of the administration that wants to have the worker removed from their job.

Based on this criteria it's easy for the system to not only be abused by Employers, but also by employees who wish to get away with harassing fellow coworkers. Eg. If an employee complains too much, files a complaint, they can be placed on a notification system. If other employees go to Human Resources with complaints about an employee, reports are gathered together. The information is forwarded from Human Resources, and then to the Occupational Health and Safety team members who can be made up of a number of internal employees, plus a number of outside employers. Some workplaces and universities even have a special threat assessment team to determine if a worker could become a danger to themselves or others.

Employees and Educational facilities can recommend that a worker seek psychiatric assistance, or even use the Employee Assistance Program if one is in place, but in many cases they can not force an employee to undergo an assessment, what they can do instead is they can add a warning marker to an employees file. Using the occupational health and safety, workplace violence prevention laws, they can add a warning marker without the individuals knowledge. Once a warning marker is added, which could say a variety of things, including that the subject has displayed violent behaviours, might be suffering from mental health issues, etc. A notification is sent out to everyone in the targets environment, under the guise of protecting the community.

What community notifications really do is poison the targets environment, and often not only socially annexing the target, but opening the target to unspeakable harassment by the community at large. These notifications are in many cases treated the same way notifications about violent offenders and other predators are treated, it puts the community into a frenzy, and the target is treated as a pariah in many cases.

Once the community receive the notification, they often start to monitor and follow the target around. Many will even gaslight the target and other subtle, and not so subtle forms of harassment in an attempt to remove the target from the environment. Thus Gang Stalking is also referred to as community mobbing, taken to the extreme. This practice not only disrupts the life of the target, it's fully capable of destroying the targets life. Because the notifications are systemic, they follow the target everywhere they go, every new job that they apply for, every new association that the target tries to form is poisoned by these notifications.

In the case of Damon Thompson he reports having made many complaints of harassment by both student and staff alike. Though he did not receive any help, student affairs reports that he was known to them. In cases similar to his, what has been known to happen to others is that the continued complaints about staff and students is not used as a learning opportunity to address mobbing on campus, or in the workplace, but is used to classify the person complaining and seeking help as mentally unwell. In similar cases, targets have had files opened, and been placed on notifications, which then increases the level of harassment the target experiences. Then due to the notification, further complaints by the target are treated as a sign of mental illness, rather than a cry for help, as they are further targeted in their environment.

Damon Thompson became violent and attacked a fellow student. He was arrested, and will likely go to jail. The fellow student he attacked a Katherine Rosen who did recover, but reports from an overseas paper report that he had made several complaints against her in the past. When the U.S. media reported the same story, they reported it as an unprovoked attack, and said that the student had just snapped for no apparent reason.

sources close to him and his family indicated that prior to this incident he had made countless complaints against classmates and this specific lab partner but with no results. Contrary to US media reports, Thompson did know Rosen who was his lab partner and who has been very offensive to him on previous occasions and even the day in question. Now UCLA in an attempt to shift blame away from itself has sought to discredit the mental stability of Thompson by using his many complaints by e-mail as an indication of instability.

But according to KTLA news, a professor who taught Thompson said he told a university administrator he was worried about the student's mental health 10 months ago. UCLA history professor Stephen Frank, who taught him Western civilization late last year admits that Thompson sent him several emails complaining that classmates sitting around him had been disruptive and made offensive comments to him while he was taking a written exam and even accused the Professor of taunting him.

8

What many individuals are unaware of is that the very act of seeking out aid and assistance for workplace mobbing, or harassment, can be used against the person complaining to make it seem as if they are mentally unstable.

One e-mail stated "I believe I heard you, Professor Frank, say that I was 'troubled' and 'crazy' among other things," Thompson wrote. "My outrage at this situation coupled with the pressure of the very weighted examination dulled my concentration and detracted from my performance."

Frank said he was present during the entire exam, that Thompson sat in the front row and that he saw nothing to support the student's complaints. Frank said he was told that other professors had reported similar exchanges with Thompson, who complained he was taunted by other students -- in class, the dorms, dining areas and the library. A university official told Frank that he could only suggest that Thompson seek treatment, but they couldn't require him to seek psychological help. "My concern was in the context of other violent incidents on campuses around the country," Frank said.

Sources close to his family explain that Thompson frequently spoke with his mother and complained about the many things student had done to him and the names he was called even by the female students. However, they explain that the problem had to be extreme for Thompson to have reacted so violently

8

It seems that in some democratic countries similar psychiatric reprisal practices have been in place for the last 40 years or more. While many were pointing the finger at countries such as the former Soviet Union and China, many democratic countries were subtle implementing policies, practices, and procedures that were almost as harsh as those practices in none democratic countries. It seems for the last few decades the occupational health and safety laws have been used in a way similar to how the laws were used in the former Soviet Union. As early the 70's there were reports of these laws being used to target whistleblowers and those who did not get along with their boss.

For change to happen and the abuses within the system to stop, the media, must be willing to report the abuses, like they were when these abuses happened in other countries. Society must wake up to the reality that we are using occupational health and safety laws, not always to protect society, but to target dissenting voices in many cases. To target those who are different, those who stand out, those who are still willing to complain, or fight for what they believe in.

With the future changes to the DSM rules and regulations, democratic countries could well wittingly or unwittingly be exactly where the former Soviet Union was just a few short years ago. Targeting perfectly sane, perfectly healthy productive members of society and declaring them as mentally ill to fit an a state and corporate agendas. A society where everyone is the same is not a creative, productive, or forward momentum society and eventually such societies do not remain productive for very long. The people just loose the will, when everyone is the same. When everyone is forced to think the same, act the same, and individuality, eccentricities, or differences are legislated, medicated, or socialized away.

1. http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=d242g51470r84388&size=largest

2. http://www.jaapl.org/cgi/reprint/30/1/131.pdf

3. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1251309/Psychiatrists-want-angry-mental-illness-How-utterly-mad.html#ixzz0p5GCoaKQ

4. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/feb/10/diagnostic-statistical-manual-proposals

5. http://www.naturalnews.com/028762_children_disorders.html

6. http://www.naturalnews.com/028803_psychiatry_disease.html

7. http://www.harassment101.com/Article5.html

8. http://www.guardian.bz/component/content/article/53-headlines/842-belizean-stude%20nt-at-ucla-facing-attempted-murder-charges

Quick Guide

This is a quick little 5 page pdf that you can download print off and share with lawyers, doctors, and others who you might be seeking assistance from or trying to gain help from.

The guide covers:

* The Jane Clift Case
* The Awareness Registry for Torbay Council in the UK
* The Canadian version of the Registry and it's use
* The American version and the process for being listed
* The Psychiatric Reprisal and how people are being listed as mentally ill, without any face to face assessments.

It's very brief, can be read in under 5 minutes and is a nice very brief introduction for anyone who claims they are not familiar with such a system, that you try to gain assistance from. You are welcome to download, print, share and freely distribute. You can reupload the guide to your own sites as well. (Please provide a credit link. Not mandatory, but appriciated.)

http://www.GangStalkingWorld.com/QuickRef.pdf
http://www.GangStalkingUnited.com/QuickRef.pdf

Mark M. Rich

Now at this stage I can only vouch for my own site(s), I can not and do not vouch for anyone else, because just like in Stasi Germany, things are not always what they seem to be. However I did want to post an interesting status update from a none related site that I found interesting.


http://www.Thehiddenevil.com


June 8, 2010
Current Political/Social Situation

Before I begin my message to family & friends, here is a brief summary of the current political situation as I understand it. The evidence which supports the claims I make in this update have been somewhat provided in my book The Hidden Evil: The Financial Elite's Covert War Against the Civilian Population. It will be expanded upon in my future book, New World War: Revolutionary Methods for Political Control.

The claims that I'll be making here which will be supported by future evidence include:

* That advanced surveillance technology is now being used on citizens by the military.
* A detailed profile of the psychopaths who are running society & using the military to attack citizens citizens with electronic warfare (EW) & psychological operations (PsyOp).
* That the military is entirely integrated into our cities & towns & is being used by Wall Street to attack its enemies.
* That a war, which is just as real as any other war that has taken place in history, is in fact taking place in your cities & towns.
* The characteristics of this new war.
* That the medical industry, & the mental health system in particular, are entirely corrupted & provide cover for it. And that the financial elite are using fabricated mental illnesses, which do not exist according to science, to conceal their targeting of citizens in this new war.

For about the last five years I've researched this have have discovered, beyond doubt, that our society is run by a group of some very wealthy families that exhibit psychopathic traits. Psychopathy constitutes a deep division in the human race, deeper than race or gender. Rather than suffering from a mental illness, psychopaths can more accurately be described as a subspecies of human beings, with normal people representing another subspecies.

These upper-level, intelligent, wealthy predators who run the system from the top, function just beyond the general public's ability to detect them. However, their personality profiles & methods they use to establish control over countries has been recently documented.

They have taken great care to gain control over the NGOs & mental health system in order to conceal any major effort at exposing them. This is the standard practice of any group of wealthy psychopaths that routinely forms active networks to establish control over a society.

They have much experience using these institutions to conceal themselves which they gained from setting up dictatorships in Communist Russia & Nazi Germany. These wealthy psychopaths have been responsible for every major war for at least the last 100 years.

They have been setting this up for decades. If the current system, which they have already established & which is being secured by this global revolution can't be stopped, then at the very least it can be documented so that future civilizations know that they existed.

Evidence suggests that these people of wealth have been using the US Army's 4th Psychological Operations Group (4th POG) & other factions of the military to reach down into your neighborhoods, literally into your homes, & selectively psychologically torture people with absolute impunity.

The mental health system, which they control, is providing complete cover for them with mental illnesses that have no scientific basis whatsoever. Evidence which shows a pattern of them establishing control over the social sciences to conceal their sick system, including their control of the mental health system as well as the nonexistence of schizophrenia spectrum disorders, will be provided in my book.

Although this is part of a wider political objective, they often use the resources under their control to attack people for no reason other than the sick amusement they receive from watching them suffer. This is consistent with their psychopathic traits.

Fake mental illnesses found in the clinical practice guidelines written by their authors have not only allowed them to torture people with no restrictions, they have allowed them to circumvent the legal system & remove people from society who they believe have violated their political & social rules, & are therefore, a threat to their rule.

To wage their new war, these wealthy elites are using the multinational force (MNF), which is an interagency effort consisting of a host nation's law enforcement, federal agencies, military, & other instruments of power.

The new enemy includes groups & individuals who exist among the civilian population & who will be the subject of constant 24/7 surveillance that is highly intrusive. They will be denied sanctuary everywhere. Anyone who is suspected of giving refuge to the enemy is also an enemy.

The battlefield (now called the battlespace) is your cities & towns. The civilian population is used by the military to attack the new enemy with PsyOp themes. This effort is part of an alliance between the military & civilian population during civil-military operations (CMO).

C2 centers (domestic war rooms) have been setup all across the planet in the civilian sector to direct these operations. Psychological operations (PsyOp) & electronic warfare (EW), including directed energy weapons, are relentlessly used on the enemy over an extended period of time to wear them down. Every instrument of national power is used against the enemy.
My Situation

I am now targeted by a single psychopathic mind which is the embodiment of this sick system. It uses all of the resources of the state to attack me. In my book I'll provide evidence that this mind in fact exists & that it runs our society.

I am under constant (constant means constant) 24/7 surveillance every single place I go by a C4ISR system with artificial intelligence connected to a directed energy weapons platform. I am only one of many that is now being attacked by this monster. This system, which will be explained in more detail in my book, is being used to electronically torture many individuals.

I am also severely gang stalked out in public by the civilian defense network. The battleswarms which the network conducts are computer generated. This defense network, which has existed in some form since at least 1917, is entirely merged into our society, just as it was in East Germany & Communist Russia.

Each internal & external environment that I have been in for any length of time is psychologically prepared by the military to convey PsyOp messages of violence. It is also packed with objects to physically block me & to create a claustrophobic effect. In future updates I'll explain how they have attempted to control my environment as much as possible.
Message to Friends & Family

I know you are handled by the security forces every single time I'm around you & that you are forced to attack me. I understand that you are being directed by them in real-time with advanced surveillance technology that includes the transmission of instructions directly into your auditory pathways. I realize that you will deny this. I also know, that, despite your honest intentions of welcoming me, you are seriously, even painfully, inconvenienced.

They have blocked me from finding employment. By placing an electronic wall around all of my communications they have prevented me from seizing any realistic opportunities. Quite arrogantly, they often let me know they are doing so.

Although the attacks occurred at the last farm I was at for several years, I was able to work & continue my studies. That has ended. At farm I'm currently at & will be leaving soon, they have created a situation where they forced these people to act in certain ways & to request things that they knew I would not go along, & which would result in my resignation.

Because I am currently not aware of any other practical option, & all other opportunities have been blocked, I will be living in the streets for now. Living with relatives for an extended length of time is not an option because I know what they must go through. Boston is the best place because of the developed transportation system, libraries, & because I'll be closer to family & friends.

I realize this seems absurd. But there is no normal solution for this because it is not a normal issue. The reality of the situation is that the people who run our society are psychopaths & they are attacking me. They have not allowed me any viable opportunities in the system that they run. This is happening & I am not the only one.

It is repeatedly communicated to me that they are having a good laugh while doing so. They find it entertaining & empowering to use their security forces to do these things. I have learned that this mind considers it to be a matter of its personal survival to kill certain types of people. Because I have studied this mind, I understand why it is attacking me & why it thinks it must destroy me.

Living sporadically or mostly in the street is a dangerous position for me to be in. They have frequently communicated to me that they have arranged to have some grotesque things done to me. I realize that I will continue to be persecuted in a sick society that they rule over unto death.

From the standard viewpoint that contains the typical societal values, it would seem that my personality has contracted. However, in reality, the exact opposite is true. I have moved forward. I refuse to go along with their sickness. I refuse to be complicit in their big lie, even if I am the only person on earth who does so.

I realize that it is essential for my growth & for the benefit of society that I participate in some societal functions. However, I will never acknowledge this as healthy. I will frequently, sometimes spontaneously, make comments regarding the true nature of this society, at any time I choose. It is important that the mostly normal & decent people living under their rule understand that they are in serious danger.

I will continue with my studies despite the change in the environment. I will be spending much time at the Boston Public Library, where the security forces will be blocking my efforts. I am almost finished with my new book. I will begin the next one shortly after.

I realize that they will not allow you to acknowledge that this is occurring in our society when I'm in your company. I understand that 911 was, without any doubt whatsoever, an inside job, & that the Oklahoma City bombing was as well. I have given you information regarding these & other activities that these psychopaths have instigated as a pretext to setup their system of control. They have prevented us from communicating facts relating to these & other events.

In other countries that these wealthy psychopaths have established dictatorships in, the security forces have concealed their targeting of civilians by ordering the friends & family members of their targets to have them forcefully committed.

If the security forces compel you to imply that certain conditions (or new rules as they're described in schizophrenia literature written by Wall Street's agents), specifically, ones that limit my activities to expose what is happening or to prevent my personal growth must be met in order for me to be among you, I will refuse. And if this occurs, I realize that they may force you to have me committed. If this happens I understand that it is not you. However, it means I'll have done everything within my ability to expose these monsters up until that point.

You should understand that I will continue to do anything I choose to at any time. I will not pretend that this monster is not reaching down into our cities & towns & murdering people, because it is. It does exist.

If they make you suggest that I see a mental health specialist I will refuse because I know that the entire system is corrupted & that the mental health system is a complete lie. If the police & a team of mental health specialists are called to have me evaluated I will not physically resist them. Instead, I will speak the truth as I understand it up until the moment they forcefully inject me with neuroleptics.

If I am taken away, mental health specialists being handled by the MNF will provide concealment for the system. They will do this, despite any scientific evidence or facts that I give them which refute the existence of the thought or emotional disorders which they will be evaluating me for.

The military has so far not been successful in psychologically killing me with EW & PsyOp. So, at the very least, the evaluating clinicians will be used to create some type of circumstance in order to limit my activities & slow me down. I realize that these mental hospitals are entirely run by the security forces, just as they are in China & Russia. If I ever make it out I will continue my work.

I understand that you may not have a choice. However, the following are typical reasons that friends & relatives of targets have had them forcefully committed:

* Danger to Self. I am not a danger to myself. I have, however, done an excellent job so far of minimizing the effects of the EW & PsyOp attacks by the military which is under the complete control of Wall Street.
* Danger to Others. I would not physically harm another person, unless they placed me in immediate danger, & had the motive, means, & capability to harm me, & left me with no reasonable escape route that I was aware of.
* Unable to Care for Myself. Despite being mobbed out of employment & denied opportunities, I have taken care of myself well & will continue to do so. The MNF has restricted my income to a family member who provides me with some finances. This may change in the future. Even if they deny me refuge to the point where I am homeless & can't perform standard hygiene, I will still continue with all of the mental, emotional, & physical exercises that I do to maintain myself, as much as possible. Under the worst circumstances, I will continue to maintain myself in some manner.
* Inability to Maintain Employment. Yes, I have been consistently mobbed out of employment. I have also been blocked by the the MNF from obtaining it. They have placed an electronic dome around me & others to accomplish this, which they've stated they'd do in their own documentation.
* Homeless. It looks as though I will be homeless soon. If so, I will be in danger (danger to self). However, in reality, I have been in serious danger & have been attacked viciously for years but have managed so far OK. When the factual evidence is considered, the real danger lies in the mental hospitals that are run by the security forces, where I would be forcefully injected with neuroleptics that destroy my mind & body, by degenerate psychiatrists, to cure an illness that in fact does not exist. All done under the guise of providing medical treatment to cover a sick system run by psychopaths. There is absolutely no comparison between living out on the street or being confined to a mental hospital.
* Suicidal Tendencies. I have none. I plan on living a long time. I plan on writing many books. I will continue to research & document this & related subjects.
* Delusions of Persecution. I am being persecuted. The military has this electronic warfare technology. They established these citizen informant networks as far back as 1917. The informant network is used by the military to convey PsyOp themes (delusions of reference in the DSM-IV) & to conduct battleswarms (developed by RAND & MITRE corporations) to destroy Wall Street's enemies. These weapons & tactics are used to relentlessly attack (persecute) the new enemy over an extended period of time. This characteristic symptom of schizophrenia is consistent with persecution mania, a symptom of sluggish schizophrenia used by the security forces in Communist Russia (built by Wall Street), to have people forcefully committed.
* Believes Friends & Relatives are Participating in the Persecution. The handling of friends & relatives by the security forces is consistent with the practices of the Committee for State Security (KGB) in Communist Russia & the Ministry for State Security (MFS) in Communist East Germany. This has also been done by the FBI in the United States during COINTELPRO. All family & friends (every single one that I have been in regular contact with) are being handled by the military & used to convey PsyOp themes (attacks) which are transmitted through various communications channels. The DOD has declared that no possible method of communication will be immune from these PsyOp attacks, & that every person & source that the enemy relies on will be interfered with. All of my friends & relatives which I have been in recent contact with, are, in reality, being used by the military to attack me. How the military accomplishes this, including a detailed description of PsyOp, will be explained in my book.
* Auditory Hallucinations. I am being attacked with technology that is a scientific fact. Its existence cannot be denied. Microwave hearing attacks are being used to torment me. Not only does this technology exist, the military has indicated that it will be used for such purposes.

These signs & symptoms of thought disorders such as schizophrenia spectrum disorders & emotional disorders such as manic depression (bipolar disorder), match exactly the technology & methods that are now used by the MNF which is being used to destroy people for Wall Street.

In addition, these symptoms do not remotely resemble the original ones reported by early proponents of the disease model, such as Emil Kraepelin & Eugen Bleuler, the works of which schizophrenia spectrum disorders are based on. They have been added over a period of time to new versions of the DSM, written by drug corporations, for profit & to provide cover for their system.
Closing

The US Government has been overthrown. The elections are complete facades used to deceive the people into thinking that they have a choice. Congress has been entirely subverted & is helping these people of wealth enslave the population.

Your neighborhoods, right now, are a war zone. Your friends, relatives, neighbors, & coworkers are being attacked. The wealthy psychopaths who run our society are using the security forces to eliminate people who are a threat to their rule as well as for their sick entertainment.

This is one of the biggest stories of our lifetime. The mainstream media will never cover this properly. The mental health system will continue to provide cover for it, as will Congress. I did not discover this. Others did. I researched it, expanded upon it, & have been able to explain it rationally using factual evidence, all of which will be provided in my book.

It doesn't have to be this way. Decency can be restored. The next holocaust can be avoided. I believe that it first starts with acknowledging--yes, once more, it has happened again--a society has once again fallen under the rule of psychopaths.

When the society of mostly normal & good people becomes tired of the endless wars, persecution, humiliation, & fearing who will be singled out & murdered next, they can begin to learn why this is happening & inoculate themselves. They can form networks to resist & expose it. They can seize control of society from the psychopaths once again, & restore their dignity.

Thank You,
Mark

Superheros

Superheros

When I was a kid like most others superheros were a big deal. Most people had their favorites. Many had their own reasons for why they liked their heroes. Some could fly, some could spin webs, some could stop bullets, some were green and hulking, but no matter how different these heroes were most had one thing in common. They had a secret identity. Often the secret identity was in contrast to who they were in real life. Spiderman, Superman these nerdy looking guys, in their spare time were hero's who their cities would have been lost without, yet at the same time, they might have been lost had their cities that they protected know their identities.

The secret identity of the superhero had been a well guarded secret until two summers ago when Tony Stark revealed that he was Ironman. My jaw at the end of the movie almost dropped. Here was a superhero breaking the cardinal rule, you do your best not to share your secret identity. For you citizen informants out there, it's like how you have to keep secret about the occupational health and safety laws, and the super duper secret club that binds you all.

Secret identities are not only protective, but it gives the superhero a bit of mystique. A second identity, a secret and mysterious life. A life which might be secret from friends, family and those close to the superhero. It's something that friends, family and those in the know often have to help the superhero to protect. Not only for their safety at times, but those shows would have been a lot more boring without the secret identities.

From cartoons to real official shows we all have hero who we loved, and we have all watched with baited breath to see how our hero would protect their secrets. From Batman/Bruce Wayne, Spiderman/Peter Parker, Superman/Clark Kent, Wonder Woman/Diana Prince, The Incredible Hulk/David Banner, many of us grew up watching them, and protecting their secrets. The same is true for hero like the Greatest American Hero, and the suit that could never quite be figured out. Some watched Jem and the Holograms protect their identities, Sailor Moon and her crew, then ofcourse there were the X-Men lead by professor Charles Xavier and their need for secrecy. Not only to protect their powers from society at large, but at times to protect them from themselves.

Heroes have come and gone over the years, but one rule had always been sacred, and that was to protect the secret identity. Now when Tony Stark pulled a look at me, look at me, I am an attention whore, it fit in well with the character, and I did get past the shock of it all, but I think he is just the superhero for this generation. A generation who like to share what they are doing on twitter, Myspace, Facebook. A generation that are less concerned with privacy, secret identities, and things of that nature. Tony Stark is arrogant, he wants people to know who he is. Even as cool as being a superhero is, he need that extra accolade from the people around him, and they do not disappoint.

Did it take away from the character? In the case of Tony Stark not really, but it was so contrasting to the dark knight that had come out only a couple of summers before. A true hero for the people who gives them what they need. If that means being the villain then that's what he is, if it means being the hero than it means being the hero, if it means sacrifice then that's what a true hero does, and just like in real life, don't expect any gratitude in return, and yes just like the end of the movie, know that they can and often are capable of turning on you in a moments notice. Thus why Jesus kept his identity as secret for as long as he could. I always found that strange as a child, reading the bible stories, but I understand it much better now.

Batman and Ironman, two very different kind of hero's. One outlandish and outgoing, who wants to be seen and heard, a hero reflective of this time period, and this generation. That's how I interpret the Tony Stark character. The dark knight was old school, in that he kept his identity a secret, but he would have revealed it and come forward to protect the innocent, and he gave them what they needed, cause he understands the nature of the people, and their need for people and things to believe in be it false or not. Thus one that should be a villain is hailed a hero, and batman the true hero becomes the villain.

They are both two very strong characters that stand out in my mind, amongst the many that have come and gone over the years, many that I have loved and grown up with. So the question remains, did Tony Stark break a cardinal rule in revealing that he is indeed Iron Man, or was he just a hero for this time period and this generation?