Absolute Proof

Absolute Proof


I keep thinking about when I was trying to figure out the whole Gang Stalking thing, and I had all the information up to a point, and had to make an analysis of the situation. I went with what I had and linked it to the closest thing that I could find, and that was Cointelpro.

Well then some time later the information came to light about the lists that they keep, under these awareness registry type programs, and only then could a different determination could be made, but what if you don't have that luxury?

http://www.modernmom.com/hottopic/2010/aug/16/craigslist-killer-philip-markoff-commits-suicide/

I was just thinking about cases of murder, rape, pedophilia, or even arson. All the evidence points to one thing, one person, but like the case of Cointelpro vs the awareness registry, what if everything matches up to a point, but you just don't have absolute proof? Absolute proof such as seeing the person commit the action itself?

With murder you see the dead bodies, with rape you can pull a kit and gather evidence, with pedophilia you can see signs of abuse, and with arson there is a fire, but how do you find absolute proof in some cases, when you don't have visual evidence?

Hire a psychic? We do use forensics, and so forth, but sometimes that is not always enough, what if the thing you seek, the thing you most desire, the absolute proof, is just not available, then what?

Do you keep the suspicions to yourself, do you share them with others, do you admit a shadow of doubt when all evidence points to the same place? Do you go with your instincts, or wait for absolute proof that will may never come?

In normal circumstances a lot of this plays out privately in the minds and hearts of the individual, but in future this could well play itself out publicly. With mind reading technology, this could well play itself out publicly. This means that anything a person is thinking, feeling, trying to figure out, could be read, and feed upon, and acted upon by others, before you have time to make a proper determination.

The Craigslist killer took his own life, so naturally we assume that this is a sign of guilt, but even innocent people do stupid things, they panic, freakout, and do stupid things. Being accused of being a murderer is no small thing, in fact it's a huge thing. Innocent people have in fact confessed to crimes that they did not do, and visa a versa as we all know. When you know that a crime has been committed, it's so important to gather and to have absolute proof, before making a determination. If that time between is perverted or prevented by other forces, this might become difficult in the future.

I think most crimes are forgivable in time, rapes, murders, arson, the one crime that I don't think is forgivable is harming a child intentionally. Purposely going out and harming or perverting an innocent child. That is why proper determinations must be made in all cases, before jumping to any conclusions.

I think in a fit of rage you could burn down someones home, kill another, even violate/rape someone against their will, these are acts which are wrong, but I put these actions on a different level, than the other as far as things that can vs can not be forgiven.

In a perfect world we have all the answers, but in an imperfect world, that might not always be the case. In future this might be made even worst if we do not have the time to investigate and reach our own conclusions, eg. the case of mind reading technology, which would jump on, or act on our very thoughts, and interpretations. Mind reading technology that might take action, wither we make a determination or not. Wither we would take action or not.

Some things I will leave to chance, but most things, important things, I would want absolute proof before I make a final determination, and sometimes unfortunately that is not always there at the time, sometimes the information only comes later on, and sometimes never at all.

I think sometimes only God can give the answers that we seek to certain questions. Only God may play judge and jury, and something only God can decide, not man.

Questions, Questions, Questions?

[quote]Lt. Michael W. Pigott, 46, a 21-year veteran of the NYPD committed suicide on Thursday Oct. 2, 2008 (his birthday). He leaves behind his wife, Susan, two sons and a daughter. He was the police officer who gave the order to taser Iman Morales, 35, who subsequently fell 10ft off the ledge of his apartment building and died.[/quote]

It's weird the officer who ordered the tasering hit of the naked unarmed man, was so distraught that he went and borrowed someone else's gun from a locker and then took his own life?
I had questions about Morales to begin with. Now when I hear that someone is deemed mentally unstable and they seem afraid of the police, I try to find out if there was any hint or trace that Gang Stalking was involved.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/03/nyregion/03taser.html?_r=1&pagewanted=2&bl&ei=5087&en=9fa606ceef16e341&ex=
1223092800&oref=slogin

[quote]Mr. Morales was described by neighbors as a quiet, polite tenant who formerly worked for a [b]financial company,[/b] but in recent years had received public assistance and taken medication for a mental illness. They said he paid his rent on time, kept his one-bedroom apartment clean and never caused trouble.

In the days before his death, however, neighbors said Mr. Morales became increasingly distraught. He was heard shouting and agitated, having stopped taking his medication. His mother called the police, and emergency services was summoned. He climbed out his third-floor apartment window when officers went to his door, and, failing to get into a window on the fourth floor, climbed onto the storefront ledge.
[/quote]

With Morales, I admit that I have not had a chance to look into it further. I saw one blog posting of a friend of his, who said he talked to him a couple of days ago and that Morales was planning on moving, but that does not tell me what I need to know.

I had found it strange that they ordered the tasering of this unarmed man. I mean if you have seen the video he was not an immediate danger to them on the ledge. Logic had to dictate to someone that if you taser him, he is going to fall and get hurt or worst, but none of the 5 or so officer present seemed to have had the presence of mind to realise this, and we all know the story he fell to his death? Do we really all know the story? Don't know.

I found it strange that the officer had given the command when the guy was just a few feet off the ground, wielding a fluorescent light which is pretty harmless most times. It didn't make sense, and I had personally wondered if it was just a lack of foresight on the part of the officer or something more deliberate.

With other things on my mind I had left the story and forgotten to blog about it, till this happened.

http://nyc.indymedia.org/es/2008/10/100452.html

According to the reports, he had his badge and gun taken away and had been assigned a desk job, not fun for an officer of 21 years.

He was also maybe going to be charged for the death, but from what we have seen in former cases, would this have been a real issue? Don't know, most police seem to not get charged in cases such as this, and with his 21 year standing, it's hard to think that he would have been dismissed, but anything is possible.

He did apologize to the family, but then the next day, on his birthday none the less, he is apparently so distraught, and emotionally disturbed, that he goes to head quarters, get's someone else's gun and takes his own life?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/03/nyregion/03taser.html?bl&ex=1223092800&en=9fa606ceef16e341&ei=5087%0A

[quote]The lieutenant, who had been stripped of his gun and badge and placed on desk duty in another unit after the Taser incident, killed himself with a single shot to the head from a 9-millimeter Glock handgun taken from another officer’s locker at Floyd Bennett Field, a former airfield in Brooklyn where several police divisions are located, officials said.

The lieutenant’s body and a suicide note, alongside pictures of his children, were found about 6 a.m. The text of the note was not disclosed, but a law enforcement official said the lieutenant may have believed that he might face charges in an inquiry and did not want to bring disgrace upon his family.

Lieutenant Pigott’s death came on his 46th birthday and only hours before the funeral of Iman Morales, 35, who died in the confrontation with officers in Brooklyn. [/quote]
It's weird because he has a wife and two kids, that he leaves behind, and there are so many other ways he could have taken his own life.

I was lying there, and going over the story and I just had so many questions, a lot of it did not make sense, but since I am the only one asking the questions, is there any point? Am I really ever going to be able to get the answers, especially if no one else is asking any questions? Does it really matter?