Gang Stalking

A upto date blog about my adventures with gangstalking. This is my way of sharing with the world what gang stalking is really like. Some helpful books. Gang Stalking Books Mobbing Books

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Dream Rape

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2010/11/14/mind-rape/

Gregory Morse

Mind rape is misleading in the title of the previous post (cannot post comments on it for whatever reason). Mind rape is being raped while conscious as opposed to being unconscious or sleep raped. “Mind rape” is better as this is not literal but figuratively speaking.

gangstalking
In reply to Gregory Morse.

I was not trying to be misleading with the title. I was not aware that there was a difference between awake mind rape and unconscious, but now that you mention it, I guess that you are correct. I am not in the habit of reciting or sharing what happens in my dreamworld. I am sure there are some who think that I am quite the head case for sharing what is happening in my Rapid Eye Movement Sleep, and the things that I am recalling, but what is happening is so drastically different, that it’s worth reporting, because what I am experiencing, even though it is only while asleep is very similar to what has been described in the John St. Clair Akawi lawsuit. Remember he worked for NSA, and if I recall correctly he says that he worked with this technology.

Also I was on another forum, and a guy had a similar event happen to him, and the images and types of things being presented in his dream is very similar to what is happening to me, similar themes. I do however thank you for the correction. I guess I could change the title to dream rape, but the point of the post was to say that I believe that the experience, even though it is only limited to R.E.M. sleep/dream state is worth reporting, because if it is what is happening, then this could be on going with others and it’s worth it to report.

I can not imagine leaving an innocent person to go through something like this by themselves in their dream state or not. I did get the suggestion that a steel cased helmet or other might work while asleep, so I will see. I don’t like sharing personal things like my dreams, but they are so distinctly different than what is normal, and the physical headache that correspond to them was worth reporting.

The only thing that I wish I had done naturally different is have far more research on this type of thing to back it up. Eg. Neural Remote Monitoring. What has the government admitted to, what have they not admitted to. The John St. Clair Akawi case was 20 years ago almost. If they had this technology then, as he claimed in his lawsuit and were doing things like this then, what is happening now, and who might this be getting used on? Most people are so unsophisticated that they can not even imagine that Gang Stalking could be happening, much less electronic harassment, and what I reported, be it R.E.M. dream sleep or not has got to be hard to believe. I am sure most people will just think, well if it’s happening in the dream state, how can you be sure that you are not just having a series of different dreams, than what is normal? However my dream scape is so very specific, so very shall we say mapped out that there is very little variance. My dream states for the last few years have been fairly specific, but what I am hearing in the dreams, experiencing is exceedingly different than what I have reported back, because they are different, and yet they hold a very specific theme.

I believe I will be able to make short work of what is happening, as far as getting this resolved, but thank you for clarifying this for me. Apparently steel cased anything while sleeping might work, and I have already limited the effect on my R.E.M. dream state, so I am in usual fashion rising to the occasion and gaining control. I did not realize that there was a difference between calling it mind rape, vs dream rape. I will post this and make the correction.

I suppose if we had to bandy words, I could just call it a dream violation, or mind violation, but I thought mind rape was more suitable, because any violation of ones mind, be it awake or asleep is a violation, and I don't feel that there should be a difference. The mind is sacred and any unauthorized hacking, asleep or awake is unsuitable.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Mark M. Rich. Status Update

I have stated before that after my years online, that I can not vouch for any target, too often I find that they are not what they appear to be, but still, I found this status update compelling, and thought you might like to read it. I have decided to settle for just posting the links. The information may be genuine, but it may also have details that are not fully accurate, the reader must decide for themselves.

http://thehiddenevil.com/status13.asp

http://thehiddenevil.com/projects.asp

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, November 09, 2010

Are Intelligence Agencies running the show?

Are Intellegence Agencies running the show?

We are told that the world is controlled by the elites. That they are planning a world government, but a lot of times when conspiracies do happen, and you look behind the curtain it often happens that these intelligence agencies, (and I use that term loosely) were behind a lot of these plots.

I am not discounting the fact that large corporations, some wealthy families in the past have played a large and significant role in historical events, but a lot of what I see happening now can be pointed back at some of these agencies. Often they control the technology, they are interconnected, share information, store information, and hide information away.

These agencies are said to be the ones behind a lot of the experiments that are happening. When you look at the John St. Clair Akwei case if it is to be believed, even 20 years ago, they had some very advanced technology that they were willing to use on him remotely. If world control is planned, and I believe it is, what role do these agencies play? How controlled are some of the leaders and politicians? How many of them are CIA operatives, or other agency operatives?

Someone was pointing out that several world leaders were previously involved with, or headed up intelligence agencies. U.K., U.S., Russia, and even Venezuela. Also the U.S. agencies have had specific roles in taking over, and setting up puppet governments in many Carribean nations over the years. The middle East is currently no different with Iraq and Afghanistan.

Operation Gladio was a combined effort with these agencies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio

[quote]
Operating in many NATO and even some neutral countries,[2] Gladio was part of a series of national operations first coordinated by the Clandestine Committee of the Western Union (CCWU), founded in 1948. After the creation of NATO in 1949, the CCWU was integrated into the Clandestine Planning Committee (CPC), founded in 1951 and overseen by SHAPE (Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers, Europe), transferred to Belgium after France’s official withdrawal from NATO’s Military Committee in 1966 — which was not followed by the dissolution of the French stay-behind paramilitary movements.

The role of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in sponsoring Gladio and the extent of its activities during the Cold War era, and its relationship to right-wing terrorist attacks perpetrated in Italy during the Years of Lead and other similar clandestine operations is the subject of ongoing debate and investigation. Italy, Switzerland and Belgium have had parliamentary inquiries into the matter.[3]
[/quote]

There are consistent themes, hints and indications that a lot of what happens in the world is quietly managed by these agencies. From drug running, child porn rings, and other clandestine activities, and yet online there is a lot of information about Illuminati, secret societies, elites, wealthy families who run the show, and not to discount those options, cause I do see that corporations like IBM, Google, Facebook seem destined to once again play a huge future role in what is to come. Eg. In 10 years google might be the only way people access information on the internet. IBM seems as if they will likely sponsor the technology to make human RFID and tracking possible.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2009/10/ibm-builds-bar-code-reader-for-dna/

[quote]
The DNA Transistor is a project from IBM Research that aims to advance personalized medicine, by making it simpler (and much cheaper) to read an individual’s unique DNA sequence — the special combination of proteins that makes you unlike anyone else.
[/quote]

But with all the other strings happening, it makes you wonder who are the players that are really pulling the strings? There is likely not just one player, there are likely a combination of players, but the question I am wondering is just how extensive a role do these intelligence agencies play in the shape of things to come, controlling outcomes, and manipulating the events that are currently underway? How much os society is controlled by them? How may on these forums, social networking sites work for these agencies?

http://gangstalkingworld.com/john-st-clair-akwei-vs-nasa/

[quote]
The Signals Intelligence mission of the NSA has evolved into a program of decoding EMF waves in the environment for wirelessly tapping into computers and tracking persons with the electrical currents in their bodies. Signals Intelligence is based on the fact that everything in the environment with an electric current in it has a magnetic flux around it which gives off EMF waves. The NSA/DoD has developed proprietary advanced digital equipment which can remotely analyze all objects whether man-made or organic that have electrical activity.

Domestic Intelligence (DOMINT)

The NSA has records on all U.S. citizens. The NSA gathers information on U.S. citizens who might be of interest to any of the over 50,000 NSA agents (HUMINT). These agents are authorized by executive order to spy on anyone. The NSA has a permanent National Security “anti-terrorist” surveillance network in place. This surveillance network is completely disguised and hidden from the public.

Tracking individuals in the U.S. is easily and cost-effectively implemented with the NSA’s electronic surveillance network. This network (DOMINT) covers the entire U.S., involves tens of thousands of NSA personnel, and tracks millions of persons simultaneously. Cost effective implementation of operations is assured by NSA computer technology designed to minimize operations costs.
[/quote]

It just makes you wonder about the deep rooted roles these agencies are playing on the world state, be it control of world leaders, technology that could be used for programing people remotely or otherwise. I think it would be interesting to discover how much of what is ongoing leads back to these agencies.

Labels: , , , , , ,