Keep your mouth shut

Keep your mouth shut

How many times have our Gang Stalkers just hoped that we would sit quietly, and keep our mouths shut? I have had so many targets over the years who were brutalized into keeping quite, and not saying anything, erasing or removing blogs under the false belief that that would somehow stop their torture. It didn't, all the sick perverts did was use the opportunity to make the targets their point of obsession and degradation.

In this world you do have options, you can sit back and take being violated and remain silent, and complacent, or you can speak out, you can let it being known what is happening to you, and you can let your voices be heard.

To shut up is to put up with what is happening to you and to silently consent that that is ok, when it is not. If something is happening to you, being done to you, the best thing you can do is exposure and awareness. Bringing out of the darkness and into the light what is happening to you, and making it be known, that is the only way you will get any relief in life.

I shudder to think what would have happened to Gang Stalking targets, and other Targeted Individuals, where would we be now if people had just kept their mouths shut? Instead we discovered that this is happening to a lot of people, a great deal of violations and illegal things were happening to many people in different areas around the globe. We now know that these Threat Assessment List are being used in conjunction with local programs, and unsavory elements to systemically destroy the lives of innocent people. We did not get this information by sitting back and shutting up, as a community this information was uncovered as each target bravely spoke out about what was happening, shared the fact that friends, family and the community were involved, shared that fire fighters, and the police were involved. We bravely took the verbal beat-downs about our sanity, and the taunts, but we stuck to our guns, till some proof could present itself, and that did not come from keeping our mouths shut.

Keeping your mouth shut is what violators want from their victims, from those they choose to pray upon, and it does you no good, or future targets no good. The only way to get anything done is not to keep our mouths shut, when these violations happen, but to speak out. Who knows where we might have been otherwise.

The Big Story

While our fellow internet users were busy chasing wikileaks, I believe the big story happened in front of our eyes, and most were not even aware of it, and failed to appreciate the true significance of it. Instead we chased after the what the media told us was vital, what the media told us was useful, blingy and of value. You tend to be smart people in many cases, but seem to fall for the usual false God's continually. I am just as fallible in many ways, but I guess living in a conspiracy, it's easier to see when something has value or is real, vs fake.

The story that the media in my opinion overhyped to death, but who's reveal in my opinion made very little difference to the course of humanity, yet in typical fashion, most of the people fell for it, and totally missed a developing story that I think is far more significant in scope and what I means for our future not only on the internet, but in others institutions not yet disclosed.

Here is the story of how the Starfish shutdown several sites on the internet right before our eyes and what the true significance was, which in my opinion was only grasped by a few, but is significant to most of society.

The Starfish

The story begins with 72 websites being shut down. Naturally the websites are copyright websites, sites that link to download sites, or sites selling possibly counterfeit material.
Interestingly enough, many of the sites targeted also had high Alexia rankings, but that is a trifle in comparison to other more important factors. Naturally a sad event, and it reminds many how vulnerable the internet is and the freedoms that we hold dear, but the real story seems to be behind the year and a half maneuverings that happened, to get someone into place who would agree to these use ICANN for such shutdowns. ICANN is now helping to police the internet vs just creating domain names.

A comment posted on another site pointed to the new CEO of ICANN and some interesting information.

[quote]
1 day ago in reply to Khalid Noufal

What everyone should have noticed was when the cyber chief of the US Department of Homeland Security, Rod A. Beckstrom, resigned last year and was immediately appointed the president of ICANN.

[/quote]

The former cyber chief of the Department of Homeland Security was now running ICANN? That seemed that depending on his views and mentality it could be a hugh conflict of interest to me. Even if he is no longer with the Department Of Homeland Security, it seemed important to find out some information about this new CEO.


http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-26jun09-en.htm

[quote]

Beckstrom is the former Director of the U.S. National Cybersecurity Center (NCSC), where he formed an effective working group of leaders from the nation's top six cybersecurity centers spanning the civilian, military and intelligence communities.

The announcement of Beckstrom's selection as CEO occurred at the conclusion of ICANN's 35th international meeting in Sydney, Australia.

"The importance of the Internet as a free flowing source of information is being underscored right now by the events in Iran," said Beckstrom. "It shows the power of human expression through a free and open Net."

[/quote]

He worked as cyber chief for about a year and a half for the department, but when the NSA were stepping on their toes and he felt that his leash was being pulled too tight, and they were not being given free reign to do what he wanted to do he wrote an interesting resignation letter and quit the job.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123638468860758145.html

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/BeckstromResignation.pdf

Just three months after this oh so dramatic revelation, he landed on his feet and was now president of ICANN, and amazing chance of circumstance, that a man who did not feel he was able to go far enough in his role as cyber chief was now in control of ICANN and a large part of how decisions get made about most of the domains on the internet. For those who don't know, ICANN is the main centralized domain registrar in charge of many top level domains such as .com, .net, .org, etc.

When he received the job, an internet poster was savvy enough to make this comment.

by karl.auerbach (157250) writes: on Friday June 26 2009,

[quote]

I hope he recognizes that ICANN is supposed to make sure that the domain system works and that ICANN is not to be a policeman doing trademark enforcement for the intellectual property protection industry or enforcing various governments' views about what is acceptable use of the net.

[/quote]

Looking ahead this comment would almost become prophetic in the days ahead and with the role that ICANN helped play in these current shutdowns of these websites. Remember the websites were shutdown without notice, without warning, and they were redirected at the ICANN level, not at the domain registry level.

The story in and of itself could end there, and well be worthy of some popcorn, but it does not end there. Mr. Beckstrom has written a really interesting book, which I would not mind reading in future, but for the moment I was only able to read the jacket, and this is what his philosophy is, about starfish organizations. The book is called the starfish and the spider.

He talks about how these companies that share a philosophy are able to come together and be stronger faster and do better than there counterparts that share a leader down structure. The starfish organization is a leaderless organization, people that share the same philosophy and social networks, but without any obvious leader, so you never truly know who is who. Organizations that you can cut down, but then another part of it springs up almost over night.

Here is what it says.


http://www.starfishandspider.com/index.php?title=About_the_Authors

[quote]

IT'S A STARFISH WORLD AND MOST PEOPLE DON'T EVEN REALIZE IT

One thing that business, institutions, governments and key individuals will have to realize is spiders and starfish may look alike, but starfish have a miraculous quality to them. Cut off the leg of a spider, and you have a seven-legged creature on your hands; cut off its head and you have a dead spider. But cut off the arm of a starfish and it will grow a new one. Not only that, but the severed arm can grow an entirely new body. Starfish can achieve this feat because, unlike spiders, they are decentralized; every major organ is replicated across each arm.

But starfish don't just exist in the animal kingdom. Starfish organizations are taking society and the business world by storm, and are changing the rules of strategy and competition. Like starfish in the sea, starfish organizations are organized on very different principles than we are used to seeing in traditional organizations. Spider organizations are centralized and have clear organs and structure. You know who is in charge. You see them coming.

Starfish organizations, on the other hand, are based on completely different principles. They tend to organize around a shared ideology or a simple platform for communication- around ideologies like al Qaeda or Alcoholics Anonymous. They arise rapidly around the simplest ideas or platforms. Ideas or platforms that can be easily duplicated. Once they arrive they can be massively disruptive and are here to stay, for good or bad. And the Internet can help them flourish.

So in today's world starfish are starting to gain the upper hand.

How can Toyota leverage starfish principles to crush their spider-like rivals, GM and Ford? How did tiny Napster cripple the global music industry? Why is free, community based Wikipedia crushing Encyclopedia Britannica overnight? Why is tiny Craigslist crippling the global newspaper industry? Why is Al Qaeda flourishing and even growing stronger? In today's world to answer this it is essential to understand the potential strength of a starfish organization.

The Starfish and the Spider by Ori Brafman and Rod A. Beckstrom, explores the phenomenal and unstoppable new power of the starfish organizations and will change the way you look at the world.

[/quote]

I found this to be one of the most significant thing that I have come across in a long time, as I am often advocating leaderless resistance, so that our organizations can not be easily infiltrated, integrated and destroyed, and here is someone interestingly harvesting a similar philosophy, who felt limited in his cyber security role, who quit and was clearly able to use some type of social network to finesse his eventual leadership of the head of ICANN and organization that plays a huge role in the internet.


http://www.starfishandspider.com/index.php?title=About_the_Book

[quote]

Book Jacket Summary

If you cut off a spider's head, it dies; if you cut off a starfish's leg it grows a new one, and that leg can grow into an entirely new starfish. Traditional top-down organizations are like spiders, but now starfish organizations are changing the face of business and the world.

What's the hidden power behind the success of Wikipedia, craigslist, and Skype? What do eBay and General Electric have in common with the abolitionist and women's rights movements? What fundamental choice put General Motors and Toyota on vastly different paths? After five years of ground-breaking research Ori Brafman and Rod Beckstrom have discovered some unexpected answers, gripping stories, and a tapestry of unlikely connections. The Starfish and the Spider argues that organizations fall into two categories: traditional 'spiders,' which have a rigid hierarchy and top-down leadership, and revolutionary 'starfish,' which rely on the power of peer relationships.

The Starfish and the Spider explores what happens when starfish take on spiders (such as the music industry vs. Napster, Kazaa, and the P2P services that followed). It reveals how established companies and institutions, from IBM to Intuit to the US government, are also learning how to incorporate starfish principles to achieve success. And it will teach you:

* How the Apaches evaded the powerful Spanish army for 200 years
* The power of a simple circle
* The importance of catalysts who have an uncanny ability to bring people together.
* How the Internet has become a breeding ground for leaderless organizations
* How Alcoholics Anonymous has reached TK million members with only a shared ideology and without a leader

The Starfish and the Spider is the rare book that will change how you understand the world around you. You'll never see things the same way again.

[/quote]

It makes you wonder how many other chess pieces are getting put into play. How many others who share a same philosophy, but have no clear ties, or affiliations are now getting into similar positions across the globe, and how many other similar plays are being set up that most do not see, and can not even imagine? Because we are dealing with a leaderless entity, with no clear associations we may never know until the plays unfold.

Think about how a society can be taken over, there are two ways, it can be done by force, or it can be done by putting your people into key positions of power, people who share ideals, philosophies, principles. No clear affiliations have to be present, you would just set up a social network, that promotes those with your ideals, and get them into significant or key roles and no one would be the wiser.


http://www.thehiddenevil.com/plot.asp

[quote]

In 1934 General Smedley D. Butler went public after he was approached by Wall Street and offered up to 300 million dollars to lead an army of 500,00 veterans equipped with munitions from Remington Arms Company to Washington D.C., in order to overthrow the U.S. Government by force. The plot was investigated by the McCormack-Dickstein committee, which found General Butler to be telling the truth.(*)

[/quote]

[quote]

According to this information, the CFR/Wall Street made an overt attempt to install a dictatorship by force. This plot was investigated by congress and found to be authentic. It is strikingly similar to the Communist Revolution which Wall Street is known to have funded, where an entire country was communized after a few major cities were seized.

"The Communists came to power by seizing a mere handful of key cities," wrote Allen. "In fact, practically the whole Bolshevik Revolution took place in one city--Petrograd. It was as if the whole United States became Communist because a communist-led mob seized Washington D.C."

[/quote]

When you know what you are doing, it does not take much for a take over to happen. It can happen seemingly in the blink of an eye, but you find that in the background, there has been strategy building, culminating over years, key players getting moved into critical positions of power, and networks set up. Most people are likely to not understand the inner workings until the whole thing is unveiled and by then ofcouse it's too late.

I don't think we are necessarily a stupid society, sometimes I think that we are just lazy. We want others to do the thinking for us, to connect the dots. We have begun to think that we are not smart enough or cleaver enough to think for ourselves, and have started to trust others to do the thinking for us. Thus voting.

If you ever want to take the power and control back you have to start to think for yourself, believe that you are capable. Connect the dots for yourself and you must stop chasing after the shiny shallow things that the world tells you are the important things. The things that they want you to buy, to swallow, to believe is the truth when it's only the ministry of truth, the lies that they want you to accept and to believe disguised as the truth. No one can hold you hand and get you to do that, you have to do that for yourself.

Anyways this was a story that I thought was slightly more important and significant than some of the pablum that you might have been feed.

Are Intelligence Agencies running the show?

Are Intellegence Agencies running the show?

We are told that the world is controlled by the elites. That they are planning a world government, but a lot of times when conspiracies do happen, and you look behind the curtain it often happens that these intelligence agencies, (and I use that term loosely) were behind a lot of these plots.

I am not discounting the fact that large corporations, some wealthy families in the past have played a large and significant role in historical events, but a lot of what I see happening now can be pointed back at some of these agencies. Often they control the technology, they are interconnected, share information, store information, and hide information away.

These agencies are said to be the ones behind a lot of the experiments that are happening. When you look at the John St. Clair Akwei case if it is to be believed, even 20 years ago, they had some very advanced technology that they were willing to use on him remotely. If world control is planned, and I believe it is, what role do these agencies play? How controlled are some of the leaders and politicians? How many of them are CIA operatives, or other agency operatives?

Someone was pointing out that several world leaders were previously involved with, or headed up intelligence agencies. U.K., U.S., Russia, and even Venezuela. Also the U.S. agencies have had specific roles in taking over, and setting up puppet governments in many Carribean nations over the years. The middle East is currently no different with Iraq and Afghanistan.

Operation Gladio was a combined effort with these agencies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio

[quote]
Operating in many NATO and even some neutral countries,[2] Gladio was part of a series of national operations first coordinated by the Clandestine Committee of the Western Union (CCWU), founded in 1948. After the creation of NATO in 1949, the CCWU was integrated into the Clandestine Planning Committee (CPC), founded in 1951 and overseen by SHAPE (Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers, Europe), transferred to Belgium after France’s official withdrawal from NATO’s Military Committee in 1966 — which was not followed by the dissolution of the French stay-behind paramilitary movements.

The role of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in sponsoring Gladio and the extent of its activities during the Cold War era, and its relationship to right-wing terrorist attacks perpetrated in Italy during the Years of Lead and other similar clandestine operations is the subject of ongoing debate and investigation. Italy, Switzerland and Belgium have had parliamentary inquiries into the matter.[3]
[/quote]

There are consistent themes, hints and indications that a lot of what happens in the world is quietly managed by these agencies. From drug running, child porn rings, and other clandestine activities, and yet online there is a lot of information about Illuminati, secret societies, elites, wealthy families who run the show, and not to discount those options, cause I do see that corporations like IBM, Google, Facebook seem destined to once again play a huge future role in what is to come. Eg. In 10 years google might be the only way people access information on the internet. IBM seems as if they will likely sponsor the technology to make human RFID and tracking possible.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2009/10/ibm-builds-bar-code-reader-for-dna/

[quote]
The DNA Transistor is a project from IBM Research that aims to advance personalized medicine, by making it simpler (and much cheaper) to read an individual’s unique DNA sequence — the special combination of proteins that makes you unlike anyone else.
[/quote]

But with all the other strings happening, it makes you wonder who are the players that are really pulling the strings? There is likely not just one player, there are likely a combination of players, but the question I am wondering is just how extensive a role do these intelligence agencies play in the shape of things to come, controlling outcomes, and manipulating the events that are currently underway? How much os society is controlled by them? How may on these forums, social networking sites work for these agencies?

http://gangstalkingworld.com/john-st-clair-akwei-vs-nasa/

[quote]
The Signals Intelligence mission of the NSA has evolved into a program of decoding EMF waves in the environment for wirelessly tapping into computers and tracking persons with the electrical currents in their bodies. Signals Intelligence is based on the fact that everything in the environment with an electric current in it has a magnetic flux around it which gives off EMF waves. The NSA/DoD has developed proprietary advanced digital equipment which can remotely analyze all objects whether man-made or organic that have electrical activity.

Domestic Intelligence (DOMINT)

The NSA has records on all U.S. citizens. The NSA gathers information on U.S. citizens who might be of interest to any of the over 50,000 NSA agents (HUMINT). These agents are authorized by executive order to spy on anyone. The NSA has a permanent National Security “anti-terrorist” surveillance network in place. This surveillance network is completely disguised and hidden from the public.

Tracking individuals in the U.S. is easily and cost-effectively implemented with the NSA’s electronic surveillance network. This network (DOMINT) covers the entire U.S., involves tens of thousands of NSA personnel, and tracks millions of persons simultaneously. Cost effective implementation of operations is assured by NSA computer technology designed to minimize operations costs.
[/quote]

It just makes you wonder about the deep rooted roles these agencies are playing on the world state, be it control of world leaders, technology that could be used for programing people remotely or otherwise. I think it would be interesting to discover how much of what is ongoing leads back to these agencies.

How cults work

As I was around the informants, it occurred to me more than ever that they, the informants are being controlled in a similar fashion, to how cults work. Examining how cults work, I think will give a better understanding into how the informants are being controlled. It’s in no way shape or form as obvious, but it’s the same mechanisms that are being used to control the informants.

The system controls, conditions, the same way that a cult would. I think this is worthwhile to understand to understand how they are kept in line, rewarded for obeying, told that we are evil, they are a family in the same way cult members become family. They attack outsiders the same way. As I watched this video, which is a bit older, I could see each theme as it relates to the informants.

How cults work



Others have written about this, but aside from the 5 monkeys video that I posted the other day, this is how they structure it, and the branches of this cult are everywhere. The schools, churches, jobs, etc.

The part in the video where it says establish fronts, reminds me of how society is set up, and most of us usually fall into one of these branches of control throughout our lives.

This is why we see the mobbing, harassment, retaliation at every sector of society as well, and this is in some ways why some of the informants don't see it, those that do are probably in the same situation that cult members who want to leave are. Since this cult is at the core of society, it's a cult that I am guessing is not too easy to leave.

As I watch the video, I wish I could transcribe it, because I can so easily relate it to the informants and what I have seen. Watch the video it's short, but it very informative.

"Make them feel part of an elite group with an important mission"

"Tighten your groups bond by establishing scape goats and enemies"

"Demonize outsiders as less than human. bias, corrupt, or conspiring against the group"

"Develop an us vs them mentality"

On it goes, but I think that it's really interesting. Other targets have looked into this aspect of it, so there is info here, and on others sites about how cults work. No you would not know if you were a part of a cult, and they don't always have anything to do with religion.

"Indoctrinate with fear"

"Suggest that if they should ever leave, something bad could happen to them"

"Without us you are likely to get into a bad accident, get sick, or even die"

"Make it easier for them to die for you, by calling their bodies containers"

I have seen these informants willing to do some stupid things for this cult, and it's little wonder, this video help shed even more light on what the informants experience.

I don't know if this is fully correct, because Anna Funder when she went to East Germany and talked to the Stasi, they said that they had enjoyed it, and they had no remorse, but then maybe it was like a cult as well. I don't know, but this is worth looking into.

Free Flow

Free Flow

I have not blogged for awhile, so that means that I have a lot to say.

The first thing that I was thinking about was the movie Marlena. I saw this movie years ago, I am not sure why, but at the time it reminded me of something similar that was ongoing.
The movie starts with this young very beautiful widow, who's husband goes missing in the war. Because she is young and beautiful the cats in the community start in on her with rumours, and they basically try to destroy her life. What happens in the movie is malicious, but it's done in such an everyday way that it was a good reflection of society.

Throughout the movie there is this young boy who witnesses it all, and he is almost the narrator of the movie if I remember correctly. What I remembered most about that movie, is that after destroying her life, when the vermin in the town finally succeeded, they were at the end trying to give her free food, I just could not understand why she didn't throw it back in their face. I never understood why her and her husband even moved back amongst such people. People in society are so like that, and that is the one part of the movie that I really wish I could have changed.

I however think the movie is a good reflection of how this society works, and many others and it's a well worth watch. What these vermin try to do to targets is very similar to what they do to the character in the movie, they damage her reputation, then make it almost impossible for her to support herself, they turn her father against her, and then destroy her life, till she becomes what they tried to make her into. It's a great reflection of society, and how it functions.

The only time these vermin in many cases are truly sorry is when they have destroyed someones life. Most of them when they issue their fake I sorry, don't mean it, because they simply do not understand the concept and do not have enough humanity to issue forth such. The end reminds me so much of these people who take part in Gang Stalking.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarcisio_Tadeu_Spricigo

The next thing that came to my mind was a case I came across with a young boy that had been molested by a priest. It was a real life case and it just served to show the pathology of this society. See the priest had molested before, but the priest was moved by the church to a poor community in South America somewhere. He offered to give music lessons to the 5 year old boy.

Anyways in time the young boy revealed to his grandmother that the priest had taught him how to "make love". He felt safe enough to tell his grandmother, anyways she did the right thing and reported the priest. You would think that the community would do the right thing and protect the child right, remove the vermin from amongst them, and not side with him? Wrong, worms support worms, another reason that society does not change. No they picked on the family, called the 5 year old boy the priests little wife, make it seem like he asked for it, and tried to pick on the family until they would bend and drop the case. See this is a large part of why society does not change, you see this in all aspects of society, but this was one of the worst examples, because it was society failing to protect it most innocent members. I never forgot that case.

Now I also think about how many times did this happen before? How many times in our societies were priest caught harming children and society pressured, or tried to pressure those that wanted to do the right thing by stopping it or exposing it? I think this is what happens more often than we think. I also recall a case where an officer came across a community where sexual molestation of children was ongoing, and had been happening for years, in the end he tried to do the right thing, and they destroyed his life to protect the vermin amongst them. They are if nothing else consistant.

http://www.projecttruth2.com/http://www.theinquiry.ca/

I have now seen this example with workplaces and sexual harassment suits, mobbing suits. The case study after case study of a community going after the target, and protecting the perpetrators. That is why society in many cases is the way it is.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenson_v._Eveleth_Taconite_Co.

I think we saw this in the movie North Country as well. When I was doing research into this, before my research started into Gang Stalking, what was most interesting about that movie was the fact that the women in the movie were just as bad as the men in some cases, not just the women, but some of those same women who were being harassed tried to work with the harassers to shut Lois Jensen up. It was that boys with be boys mentality, the she was a slut, she deserved what happened to her. See they refused to take any ownership for their actions, and the community protected them, and the workplace protected them, and that had been ongoing in that community for some time, till Lois took a stance. Ofcouse that case changed laws across the US. The first class action lawsuit of it's kind.

What is amazing to me is that is society that prevents change from happening, it is society that protects the perpetrators, it is society that often refuses to allow positive changes to come about, even when it would be to their own benefit. Kind of like a group think, but you can not call it a group think, because they do not think.

It's this dirty code of silence, where men, women, and children are used to try to silence targets, and make the actions of perpetrators seem acceptable. It's this disgusting code that lacks honour that makes it ok for societies to keep silent about very detrimental things, that protect people that should not be protected and to lash out and to try to destroy the targets. Society has for the most part managed to continue to be this way, and it does not change. Many go along with it out of fear, they suppress what they know is right, be it defending children, women, or others, they do what they can to protect the perpetrators. It might even be out of a sense of misplaced loyalty, the individual does not have a reason to get involved, or they know that to side against the perpetrator will be detrimental towards them, either way the society continues down this path, and that is why society is the way that it is. That is why it does not change.

These cases all saw the targets being dehumanized, made to seem less than, the child was called the wife's little priest, Lois Jensen was made to look like a slut, the officer of several years was harassed till his life was ruined, and in the movie though a fictional account, the character goes through a similar process of having herself broken down. Society is this way at every level and it is too often because people allow it to be that way.

Can society ever change? Not while the monkeys are happy to live in the cage. Silencing anyone and anything that exposes that their are some real problems in society. Rather than looking at it and examining what is ongoing, the worms side with the other worms and thus it continues.
Like attracts like, and worms attract worms, and thus the decent in society is often removed to make way for the indecent, and even when it is bad for the society and the community, it's still continues.

Turn off the set, get on the net

Turn off the set and get on the net.

As you know I have spent a great deal of time researching different communities on the internet. The opportunity is there, so why not utilize it.

One thing I have discovered is that a lot of people in some of the communities that I visit watch little televiion, or no televiion at all. They get more or most of their entertaiment and news from the internet. I hear this expression a lot. "I hardly watch television", or "I don't watch television at all.

I find that a lot of people who have stopped or decreased using the mainstream media to be well versed, more so than those who use the mainstream media, and who watch large amounts of television.

I also find that those who have given up the TV set, all the music stations, and reality tv, have a better sense of some of what's happening in the world. I don't just mean the screen that's been put over our eyes, but what's behind the screen, what's really going on.

I find a lot of these people are at least if not believers, they are aware of some of the conspiracies out there, and they are a bit more willing to be open minded, or at least willing to be looking for the truth.

Don't get me wrong, you have others who replace the tv for social networking sites, and I am not sure they are getting the same positive effects, but your chances are greater online that you will be exposed to a variety of different concepts, dissenting views, and theories than you would be by watching television.

Don't get me wrong, I watched television and still catch a few shows, but very little time is spent being feed the commercials and culture that the mainstream want most people to adapt.
I think surfing intelligently gives more room for critical thought and critical thinking. I believe this to be true for the young as well as the old.

I came across one real life scenario where a family had a young child. At the time I thought he should have been put into a pre-school program, because he was displaying signs of being very smart and I thought they should capitalize on this, from an early age. Instead they feed him a steady diet of tv. Not just children's programs, but American music channels, several hours a day. Three and a half years later, the child is not the same. He mostly plays video games, and watches this music channel. Where his young ambitions could have and should have been channelled into better options, I guess they wanted to make sure he would fit into society and follow the pre-set stereotypes set out for young men of his ilk. It's really sad to have watched, but now I understand the mentality a lot better, and why some families succeed, where some families fail, and their children don't do as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hunger_Strikehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riley_Wuz_Here

It reminds me of some of the boondocks episodes, that have aired. Interesting show, with some humourous content. I believe the show is now off the air.

I essentially believe that we all start out with a similar degree of intelligence, but those around us have a huge impact on where that potential will end up, or if it will even have a chance to get off the ground. Interesting.

The other problem with television is what it does to our subconscious mind. Wither we realise it or not, what we watch on tv, is the reality that we create in the real world. The subconscious mind is generally a mirror, it does not understand, and it does not process information the same way our awake mind does. So if we are feeding our subconscious, you know that great place, that helps create our very realities, if we are feeding it a constant diet of rapes, murders, robberies, etc. we are going to get that in return. It's like a child, it does not know bad from good, real from fake, and if we encourage it in an unprofitable path, it will take that direction, and create that scenario not only for the individual, but for the society at large.

We are not just physical beings, we are spiritual, and we each have an amazing role in creating the world around us. We do this unconsciously everyday wither we realise it or not, wither we believe it or not it still happens. That's why this world also constantly tries to tap into our fears and our more base natures, this world nourishes this and encourages this, and then when we have the world that we see before us we wonder why? What we tune into on a daily basis has a huge impact on the society and culture that we see before us and the world that we create, we create individual realities, but then we also contribute to the universal realities of society. So think about that the next time you are watching the tube. Your subconscious is a naked, innocent, child, with very powerful creative abilities, for good or bad, it knows no differece, and can be influenced.

Lastly, I would not be me if I did not throw a bit of conspiracy out there.
I have heard this before, but I will just highlight some of this bloggers post, because I think they did a good job.

Now according to what we are being told, digital takes up less bandwidth and that is suppose to be the reason for the switch, but some have said the real reason is that digital signals make it easier to control the mind, the digital boxes and newer tv's might have ways of transmitting what goes on in the home, meaning they have some kind of camera capabilities. As I have mentioned before this is the thought with those same tv's in the malls, and subways, etc.
Don't worry there are lot's of people to tell you that it's all just in your mind and it's nothing to worry about, just a hoax right?

http://www.privacydigest.com/2009/02/24/hidden+cameras+dtv+converters+youtube+hoax+fans+conspiracy+fears

Yet others still believe there is more to it than just a simply switch and I will share a blog posting on that topic.

http://thetruthandlight.wordpress.com/2008/11/08/the-real-reason-behind-the-switch-from-analog-to-digital/

[quote]This lead us to the topic of why the US will be switching all broadcasts from analog to digital.

The answer is a two part answer; first, the most obvious reason is because with digital broadcasting, it would be incredibly easy to manipulate a live image. So what does that mean, you may ask?

That means that they can show you for instance a “terrorist act” taking place that really never took place and then use the images as proof of why we must retaliate and go to war with a particular nation. This is very dangerous stuff.[/quote]

Wow and their is another training exercise coming up in late July, just like the training exercise that happened right before 9/11, let's hope that we don't have a repeat of this or an invasion or some other whack scenario.

[quote]Another reason why the switch from analog to digital is taking place, is a more malignant reason, and as reason # 1, most people are not aware of it and they should. Undisclosed sources, experts on reverse technology have informed that any television set manufacture after 1995 has the capability not only to receive a broadcast signal, but to also send one. That’s correct, any television manufactured after 1995 already has a built in feature to send a broadcast signal from your living room of live images of what’s happening in your home.[/quote]

That would be so like 1984, but how could such a thing be possible, and would our beloved governments really want to spy on us and invade our privacy's?

[quote]You may ask, how can this be possible?
Its really not as far fetched as you may think, experts say that anything that is built for one particular purpose, can in deed be reconfigured to perform the exact opposite. For instance, a car is built to drive forward but it can also go backwards, a blowing machine used to blow leaves can actually be reconfigure to do a sucking function. I believe we call those “vacuum cleaners”
OK, but how could they pull off such operation of such magnitude? (You may ask)

* Well, they did this on stages, first stage was to begin manufacturing these TV sets with hidden cameras either behind the picture tube or on the remote sensor area. * Next, they would need to change the communication wiring network system to make it possible to receive multiple signals from multiple locations.

Well, you might remember that that’s been accomplished too. The system is called fiber optics and it’s been wired everywhere, phone lines and broadcasting lines in which are joined in one gigantic digital communication network.

Now, since they know that they won’t be able to spy and monitor people through an older television set model, their solution is ingenious.

You simply won’t be able to watch any television programming until you either, buy a newer set which already comes equipped to monitor you, or until you buy their TV box converters in which will come equipped with the same technology implanted on the newer TV models that will facilitate their monitoring of you by watching you in your own home!

Can’t afford a digital converter box?

Don’t worry, the government has millions of coupons that will assist you in getting one!
In other words, they want to be able to monitor every single one of us through hidden cameras in which will be installed on these devices to see and hear all that you do in the privacy of your own home.

This is called “New World Order”. In communist countries like Cuba, if you say something that the government doesn’t like, a secret police will report you to the higher authorities and you will be whisked away and no one will see or hear from you again. Why aren’t they doing that now?[/quote]

Wow that seems pretty crafty, but if it's true that would mean that they had been planning this for years. Would the government pull such a diabolical plan on it's beloved people?

[quote]Well, the fact is that the carpet is being laid folks, and they will do just that in due time. The US constitution would have to be totally destroyed and some of you might already know that is already being accomplished. With the help of the media in which the NWO owns, people’s minds are being reshaped, controlled, and manipulated, in what they see, hear, or should believe is right, wrong, true, or false.

This is a fascist state known as the New world order, where your privacy, rights, and privileges will be gone like a thief in the night.

Its so outrageous that they see you (the average citizen) as one dumb sheep. If they tell you is good, then you better believe it. Comcast has jumped in the ban wagon assisting the NWO by openly admitting that they are installing cameras on their new Comcast cable boxes. They claim that this is to “serve you better” of course. You see, because once you approach your television set, your TV will recognize you and pull all of your favorite TV programming ready for your viewing pleasure.

Come on!

Who writes the scripts for these people, and why do they insist we we are as dumb as a door knob? The fact is that be ready to be insulted, demoralized, ridiculed, and who knows what more, because you are a thinking person and have common sense.
The NWO, don’t like that one bit, so they will do their best to discredit the sources that produce truth. Folks, this is happening every day.

Any one with a legitimate question is being ridiculed, any one bringing legitimate concerns, its being labeled a “quack” a “nut” a “conspiracy fool” etc, etc.[/quote]

Wow this sounds just like a plot out of that movie the Echelon Conspiracy, only in that movie they monitor everything and would have used even our very computer cameras to watch us, but this can already be done, via remote control technology. Just like how they used the cellphones to listen into that mob bosses conversation, even when the phone was turned off. They remotely downloaded technology to his phone, and used it as a bug. The same can be done with cameraphones, laptops, etc. As you might remember a families cameraphone was used to monitor them 24/7.

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/Story?id=3312813&page=1

[quote]Who do you call when your personal cell phone has been turned into a spying device, tracking your family's every move, and giving an anonymous stalker a view into your private life?

Three Washington state families say it happened to them and left them feeling like they were living in a horror movie. [/quote]

http://www.thechicagosyndicate.com/2006/12/roving-bug-in-cell-phones-used-by-fbi.html

[quote]The FBI appears to have begun using a novel form of electronic surveillance in criminal investigations: remotely activating a mobile phone's microphone and using it to eavesdrop on nearby conversations.

The technique is called a "roving bug," and was approved by top U.S. Department of Justice officials for use against members of a New York organized crime family who were wary of conventional surveillance techniques such as tailing a suspect or wiretapping him. [/quote]

Would could this truly be about to happen with our television sets? I mean even google a some time ago, said that they wanted to advertise to the public by listening to what they were watching in the back ground. That's right, they wanted to use the microphones and possibly cameras on our computers to find out what we were watching, and then advertise to us based on this. Cool idea right?

http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=188702619

[quote]In a research paper presented last week at interactive television conference Euro ITV in Athens, Greece, Google researchers Michele Covell and Shumeet Baluja propose using ambient-audio identification technology to capture TV sound with a laptop PC to identify the show that is the source of the sound and to use that information to immediately return personalized Internet content to the PC.

"We showed how to sample the ambient sound emitted from a TV and automatically determine what is being watched from a small signature of the sound—all with complete privacy and minuscule effort," Covell and Baluja write on the Google Research Blog. "The system could keep up with users while they channel surf, presenting them with a real-time forum about a live political debate one minute and an ad-hoc chat room for a sporting event in the next."

The scheme is described in the research paper using a term that seems to be an oxymoron: mass personalization. It might also be characterized as a mixture of oil and water, a combination of television broadcasting and Internet narrowcasting. [/quote]

Wow will anyplace still be private? In a lot of cases we do have some choices about what we take into our homes. Using a digital box is not a necessity, it's a choice. Carrying a camera or cellphone in some cases is a choice. We do still have some choices about the Orwellian society that is being created right before our eyes.

The war on terror. A lie and well.

The war on terror. A lie and well.

We have yet another terrorist plot foiled by those brave heroic police stopping more terrorists. What I have noticed is that all these terrorist plots that are foiled, have a informant (snitch) somewhere in the middle. The plots in Canada and the U.S. have all been the same. Even the London bombing has some questions that need to be answered.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/london_exercise_video.html

Let's look at this latest plot in a little bit more detail. We have four recent converts to Islam, all or most converted while in jail. Though this kind of conversion does happen, we have to question if any of these men were informants who were made or asked to convert to the religion for what would come next. What we do know for sure is that none of these men grew up in the Muslim faith. So we don't know what inspired them to convert to the religion in the first place, or if they were forced as part of a jailhouse agreement.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2009/05/20/2009-05-20_fbi_arrest_four_in_alleged_plot_to_car_bomb_bronx_synagogue.html#ixzz0G6wsakR2&A

[quote]The suspects - three U.S.-born citizens and one Haitian immigrant - at least three of whom were said to be jailhouse converts to Islam, were angry about the deaths of Muslims in Afghanistan, sources told The News.[/quote]

Wow were not the London bombers angry about something similar?

When did these jailhouse conversions happen? Three guys who are jailhouse coverts just happened to find each other, plus one other. I mean think of how many Muslims there are in the world, but three guy who just happen to covert in jail end up hanging out with each other and plotting terror on America and a Jewish Synagogue? Remember these are men who grew up in America and were born there. Again all of them had been in jail and were out, so we really need to look at what their crimes were and if they were informants when they got out of jail. If so that puts a different spin on this case.

The next part, which I love, is that there is another informant at the heart of this so called terror plot. A plot to make believe that the threat of terror is still very real, and that we need the money to keep flowing. The people are not all that stupid. Some are, but many are waking up to the reality that portions of this war on terror need to be questioned.

[quote]Sources said the four men were arrested after a year-long investigation that began when an informant connected to a mosque in Newburgh said he knew men who wanted to buy explosives.[/quote]

An informant started the investigation, just like all the other investigations. Might we all ask how did the informant find out that the men wanted to buy explosives? Did he perhaps encourage them to do so, or did his handlers point out the recent coverts? Remember during Cointelpro the FBI had 25% or more of the Klan were FBI agents or informants, those members are usually the ones who carried out the violence against the civil rights movement, or who were agitated to by the informants.

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/FBI/COINTELPRO_Untold_Story.html

[quote]Church Committee hearings and internal FBI documents revealed that more than one quarter of all active Klan members during the period were FBI agents or informants. 44

However, Bureau intelligence "assets" were neither neutral observers nor objective investigators, but active participants in beatings, bombings and murders that claimed the lives of some 50 civil rights activists by 1964. 44

Bureau spies were elected to top leadership posts in at least half of all Klan units. 45

Needless to say, the informants gained positions of organizational trust on the basis of promoting the Klan's fascist agenda. Incitement to violence and participation in terrorist acts would only confirm the infiltrator's loyalty and commitment.Unlike slick Hollywood popularizations of the period, such as Alan Parker's film, "Mississippi Burning," the FBI was instrumental in building the Ku Klux Klan in the South,"...setting up dozens of Klaverns, sometimes being leaders and public spokespersons. Gary Rowe, an FBI informant, was involved in the Klan killing of Viola Liuzzo, a civil rights worker. He claimed that he had to fire shots at her rather than 'blow his cover.' One FBI agent, speaking at a rally organized by the Klavern he led, proclaimed to his followers, 'We will restore white rights if we have to kill every negro to do it.'" 46[/quote]

This was back in the 1960 when they were not half this organized. It's no 35 years later. Do you think that much has changed? Do you think these organizations have stopped using terror to get their point across, or using informants to infiltrate these groups, and to incite violence when it suites their needs?

[quote]Officials say the arrests follow a year-long undercover investigation by the joint terrorism task force, which is comprised of agents from the FBI, NYPD and state police.
The U.S. attorney's office says James Cromitie, David Williams, Onta Williams and Laguerre Payen have all been charged with conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction and conspiracy to acquire and use anti-aircraft missiles.[/quote]

With the history of Cointelpro and government agencies often being the one's carrying out the terror, you have to ask yourself if any if not all of these men were converts for a reason, and how big a role did the informant play to continue the war or terror?

[quote]Investigators say an undercover informant provided the suspects with an inactive missile and inert explosives.

"The bombs had been made by the FBI technicians. They were totally inert. No one was at risk or in danger of being injured this evening," said Police Commissioner Ray Kelly.[/quote]

So the informant supplied everything the men would need for the fake attack that was never going to happen. This is similar to the fact that in almost every other case I can think of, an informant is at the heart of making the suggestions, getting the manure for the bombs, or in this case the explosives. It's always the informant making the initial suggestion, then getting the pigeons to agree, then suggesting what they should by, and then disappearing when it comes time for the arrest.

It's the same thing case after case after case. Even the bombs were manufactured by the FBI in this case.

[quote]The undercover informant who promised to arm them posed as a member of Jaish-e-Mohammed, an anti-India Pakistani group with connections to Al Qaeda, said Joseph Demarest, assistant director of the New York FBI field office.

"This shows the real risks we face from homegrown terror and jailhouse converts, and the need for constant vigilance," said Rep. Pete King (R-L.I.). [/quote]

No to be completely honest with you, this shows more and more the lengths that agencies are potentially willing to go to to keep the phony war on terror going.

This war has served to keep people bound and scared. It's served to keep them powerless and the fear has been used to control them. The terror stops when people start asking questions, thinking critically, and stop letting others enslave them via fear.

I do agree that constant vigilance is needed, but I believe what we should watch out for is histories tendency to repeat itself. These constant terror threats are designed and I believe manufactured to keep you scared and powerless, that is what needs to be watched and kept a close eye on.

For those who care about freedom, you should be asking a few questions, starting with the role that the informant played. How recent were these jailhouse conversions? How much time did they spend in jail, and was their conversion a part of the condition for their release? You have to ask the questions, because the same scenarios are coming up time and time again.

[quote]While the bombs these terrorists attempted to plant tonight were - unbeknownst to them - fake, this latest attempt to attack our freedoms shows that the homeland security threats against New York City are sadly all too real and underscores why we must remain vigilant in our efforts to prevent terrorism," Bloomberg said.[/quote]

These terror plots at least work better than the low flying airplanes over New York City. Till people wake up to the possibility, then the terror will live on, and you will consistently be enslaved by your fears.

People need to take their power back, and stop living in fear, stop letting these so called terror plots happen without asking questions. The people have the power to take back their freedom, to live without fear.

Please read the following story.

How Corporate Provacateurs Made Fran Trutt an “Animal Rights Terrorist”

http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/fran-trutt-making-an-animal-rights-terrorist/1716/