Keep your mouth shut

Keep your mouth shut

How many times have our Gang Stalkers just hoped that we would sit quietly, and keep our mouths shut? I have had so many targets over the years who were brutalized into keeping quite, and not saying anything, erasing or removing blogs under the false belief that that would somehow stop their torture. It didn't, all the sick perverts did was use the opportunity to make the targets their point of obsession and degradation.

In this world you do have options, you can sit back and take being violated and remain silent, and complacent, or you can speak out, you can let it being known what is happening to you, and you can let your voices be heard.

To shut up is to put up with what is happening to you and to silently consent that that is ok, when it is not. If something is happening to you, being done to you, the best thing you can do is exposure and awareness. Bringing out of the darkness and into the light what is happening to you, and making it be known, that is the only way you will get any relief in life.

I shudder to think what would have happened to Gang Stalking targets, and other Targeted Individuals, where would we be now if people had just kept their mouths shut? Instead we discovered that this is happening to a lot of people, a great deal of violations and illegal things were happening to many people in different areas around the globe. We now know that these Threat Assessment List are being used in conjunction with local programs, and unsavory elements to systemically destroy the lives of innocent people. We did not get this information by sitting back and shutting up, as a community this information was uncovered as each target bravely spoke out about what was happening, shared the fact that friends, family and the community were involved, shared that fire fighters, and the police were involved. We bravely took the verbal beat-downs about our sanity, and the taunts, but we stuck to our guns, till some proof could present itself, and that did not come from keeping our mouths shut.

Keeping your mouth shut is what violators want from their victims, from those they choose to pray upon, and it does you no good, or future targets no good. The only way to get anything done is not to keep our mouths shut, when these violations happen, but to speak out. Who knows where we might have been otherwise.

Miley Cyrus the next in line?

Miley Cyrus the next in line?

Now I don't know how many people watch South Park but there was an episode called Britney's new look. At the end of the episode where Britney Spears is ritually sacrificed, they turn and try to figure out who the next victim is going to be and lo and behold it's Miley Cyrus.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzPr-scifIs

http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s12e02-britneys-new-look




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britney's_New_Look

After seeing on the news that Britney Spears has been spotted in South Park and a man has been paid $100,000 for a photo of her urinating on a ladybug, Stan, Kyle, Cartman and Butters decide to stage a photograph of her crapping on a squirrel (actually Butters in costume), although Butters feels that they should leave Spears alone. They pass the security at the "Komfort Inn," where she is staying, by claiming to be her children. Spears is elated that her children have come to see her, but once she realizes that they are not actually her kids she falls into deeper depression. Finally overwhelmed by the constant harassment and jokes, she attempts suicide by shooting herself in the head with a shotgun.

Miraculously, though the top two-thirds of her head is missing, Spears survives (in a manner similar to Mike). Guilt-ridden, Kyle and Stan visit her in hospital to apologize, telling themselves that they should have left her alone. When one of the paparazzi breaks through the window, Spears' manager sneaks her and the boys out the back into his car but the paparazzi chases them. They escape to her recording studio, where she is made to record a comeback song, although Stan and Kyle insist that this will only make matters worse. She later performs at the MTV Video Music Awards, where the crowd nitpicks her "flaws", almost completely overlooking the fact that two-thirds of her skull is gone and she can only "speak" in horrible gurgles.

The boys decide they need to help Britney and devise a plan to take her to the North Pole by train to escape from it all. Kyle diverts the paparazzi and eventually confronts them for abusing her, pointing out that she is no longer in any condition to handle it. To Kyle's horror, they explain that she "has to die." A narrator announces Stan's mission to bring Britney to the North Pole. The train engineer notices Spears on his train and stops at a village site where the paparazzi, villagers, and Kyle are waiting. The villagers explain to the boys that ritual human sacrifice is needed for a good corn harvest; however, in modern, more civilized times, people prefer to drive their sacrifices to suicide rather than stoning them to death. The crowd overwhelms Spears and proceeds to somehow photograph her to death, leaving Stan and Kyle in shock.

Months later, South Park residents comment on the good corn harvest while at the supermarket. A newsflash appears on TV, informing the townspeople that Miley Cyrus (star of Hannah Montana) is quickly becoming a major superstar. The townsfolk of South Park see her as their next target. Stan and Kyle reluctantly go along with them, having given up all hopes of reasoning with them.

A lot of people thought the episode was funny, but there was an underlying bit of reality to it. Meaning that I think some people are groomed or set up to be pushed into circles where they will become the next on the hit list.

If you look at Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, and Miley Cirus, all were Disney stars if I recall correctly? All come form broken homes, meaning that the parents are divorced, and though rich in their own rights, their families don't seem to have the same connections that other families do, even though Miley's dad is famous.

So if Miley Cirus is being set up to be the next ritual sacrifice, who is deciding this? What forces are conspiring behind the scenes to ensure that she get's pushed into this path and that she is the next to make the list?

Is there still an element in our society that needs the ritual sacrifice, that picks a young star, maybe young female starlet to rise to the top of society and then ensures that they are lead and directed into destructive paths that will ensure their eventual downfall in society?

Is Miley Cirus being lead and groomed for such a path and if so, what can be done to prevent an eventual outcome such as what we have seen happen to young starlet's such as Britney Spears or Lindsay Lohan?

Is there a secret type of lottery that happens in the lives of some in society. Are they secretly groomed to be sacrificed at some later point in time, to sacrifice the blood lust our society can no longer openly perform, by such acts such as the ritual sacrifice/

Cultural references

Stone and Parker indicate that the episode was based on placing Britney Spears in the Shirley Jackson short-story "The Lottery". [2] Britney's situation for most of this episode is very similar to that of the narrator in Chuck Palahniuk's novel Invisible Monsters.[3]

Is it just a coincidence that these young ladies all started out with Disney? Is Disney helping in the grooming of these young stars, or is it just a bad coincidence?

http://www.tmz.com/2010/12/10/miley-cyrus-video-bong-hit-smoking-salvia-herb-pyschedelic-birthday-party-hannah-montana/#comments-anchor

Miley Cyrus celebrated her 18th birthday by experimenting with a bong and catching a case of the giggles. The video was shot during a party at Miley's L.A. area home 5 days after her 18th birthday.

According to a source connected with Miley ... the smoke filling the bong is a natural herb called salvia which has psychedelic qualities. Possession of salvia is legal in California.
As for the video ... the source tells us it was shot by one of Miley's friends -- and theory is that someone stole or copied the video from that friend's camera.

Miley just turned 18 which means that she is now legal and the games can begin, so if there is a plot a foot, how can it be headed off at the path, so that she does not repeat the same mistakes of other celebrities? Are people deliberately being put into Miley's path which will lead her down a road of explicit exploits, drugs, and other misadventures?

I see Miley going down a very bad path. I would like to believe that there are no evil forces that would work in the lives of an innocent person to lead them down a bad path, to deliberately groom their life, so they end up being the next ritual sacrifice on the block, the next media feeding frenzy, but I know differently, and I wonder if she is the next in line, what can be done to change that?

All is fair, until you fight back

All is fair, until you fight back

I was just remembering some of the fun harassment that I experienced at work, and the thing about the harassment is that all was fair. As long as I was the one being harassed, picked on, or bullied it was all good, but the moment I took a stance, the moment I stood up for myself, then it was a problem. Suddenly there was concern that I could be some sort of a threat, and the multitude that came against me, used each other to complain and made it look like I was the problem. Had I been the one doing any of this to them, the problem would have been solved at the on set, but it's only a problem when you fight back, not when you are the one being picked on. See how that works?

The same is true on the street. Doesn't matter if they bang into you, try to drive over you, run you down, the fact that you are followed like an animal day in and day out, the moment you yell at them, hit back at them, or whatever, then you are the problem. They can litterally kill you, rape you, rob you, harm things you care about like pets, your kids, break into your house, and all other sort of villany, and no one will say a word. It's the hypocracy of this system, but let's say you catch one and beat the tar out of them, or try to arm yourself, suddenly it's a problem.

To them it does not matter how much physical, spiritual or other forms of violence is used against the target, it's sport for them, the same way it was sport to watch lions feed on people in Roman times, but the moment you defend yourself, that is when it is a problem.

The thing about being a target is that you realise in many cases, you can not reason with most of them. Many of them are low, vile, and they stupidly imagine that you would someday be happy or comfortable being one of them, when that is so far off from reality. They live in one world, and they often wish to corrupt your worlds to suit their needs. Some people might eventually give in, but the reality is many targets myself included loath the way these people live, act, behave, and how they destroy the innocent, and most people will do what they can to avoid becoming a part of what they despise.

That was just some little insight that I am sure most targets are aware of. They like you to sit back quitely and take your punishments, to keep your mouth closed, but the reality is, exposing what they are doing is often the one true weapon that many of us have. Exposing them often does not have to involve violence, and making others aware of what is happening means that when they see the situation, some of them at least can see it for what it is. Otherwise these lowlife creatures are happy to get away with what they can. They are low in their every thought, actions, and deeds, and honestly I realise that in many ways the best way to deal with them would be honestly to just knock some sense into them, but on the other hand, I realise that in our namby pamby cry baby socitey you should try to avoid any kind of confrontation with them if and when you can.

They want to be the slave masters in society, they want to rub the backs of the slaves raw with their whips, and they pray and hope to God that we never get the whips in our hands, and that we never do back to them what they do to us, the reality is that most of them could never hold up to what they meet out to us, so at the end of the day just stay strong. If you have survived this long it's likely because you are better and stronger of mind than many of them.

At the end of the day, my recommendation is in the waking world still avoid violence when possible, and just live your lives to the best of your ability. Conduct yourselves accordingly, but what you do in your dream world, and in your fantasy world, just like what you do in the privacy of your own home is still your business as far as I am concerned. :-)

It not just you

They Know.

I was on another targets blog yesterday and she was talking about how deeply betrayed she was by her family, and how horrible it was to discover that they were in on it.

The other thing she talked about was taking a bus and being targeted and wondering how people around her could be so unaware. The reality is they might not be unaware in a lot of cases.

My first awareness of this came at a job, I was experiencing the vibrations, which I sort of thought was maybe just me, cause no one else seemed uncomfortable, but I did notice, that two other people in the room, who had something in common with me, were falling asleep the same time I did, after the vibrations begun. I started to suspect that it was not just me, but confirmation of this came later.

One of the persons that I ended up sitting near, could not stay seated when it started happening, and he pointed out to me a good temp way of avoiding what was happening. I was like in totally shock, so from there I realised a lot of this is not just you, but what is really amazing is how people just act like they don't notice, and like nothing is going on.

Anyways on subsequent jobs, I would have more forthright coworkers, one would always call the boss over when the vibrations would start, and we could all see the plexi glass shaking, and this co-worker would get upset and be like it's happening again. Eventually this co-worker was allowed to move. I changed locations, obviously the vibrations started again, and again those around me over time moved, so it's not just you. Also in the new area, someone around me would also call the boss when they would start happening. The fun part for me by this stage is that I had found a good workaround, and I could just sit there and pretend that nothing was happening. Remember if they complain, they are listened to. If the target does it, it's viewed as part of their mental illness, or delusions.

Realising this, what I do now when they get too happy with shaking the hell out of me at home, and it starts to vibrate my heart a bit too much, I just ensure that I am at a location that is sure to be felt by those outside of my location, and let them complain if they wish to. It's worked on a couple of occasion.

Remember people that I worked with were complaining about this stuff, after 8 hr shifts. People that have not had to sit around me for months or years at a time. As the target I am getting this at home, work, job after job, day after day, week after week, month after month. Like I said however, I was lucky to find a temp work around that worked at work, and somewhat at home, to lessen the effects. Ofcourse the idea is to leave the target so tired from lack of sleep they can hardly function, but then these creatures are the lowest level of degenerates. It's hard to believe that these Threat Assessment Teams, at least some of them, don't know exactly what and who they are contacting out these assignments to. Ofcouse if you can make the target look crazy, it's more funding for them, and they can pretend their fake Threat Assessments work. What the target committed an act of violence, clearly we were right to have this person on our list, when the reality is, the sick freaks that you hire to torment and torture people are often what cause them to lash out, commit suicide, end up in jail, and institutions.

Can't say that I never mentioned it.

Cold Case

Cold Case

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1290674350/0#9

Three years ago I heard the story of a young mother that stabbed her two children in a gas station bathroom. She only a few days before had spoken out about a neighbour stabbing her younger brothers dog to death, and then within days had stabbed her own children to death. When I heard the story at the time. I firmly felt that it was a case of Gang Stalking. I didn’t know why, I really had very little proof to go on, and very few details were forth coming in the case, well three years later, I have many more details and I feel there was a good chance she was on a Threat Assessment Hit List.

I recap with the link to hightech harassment. One of the things the site talks about is how many times parents especially it seems mothers are tricked into killing their children, via external voices.


http://www.hightechharassment.com/

[quote]

The sonic harassment technology in addition to tricking people into believing their house is haunted can be used to trick a mother into believing that she is speaking directly to God. A mother claiming that she received instructions from God to kill her children is easily accomplished with this classified sonic harassment technology. Secret police living in a neighboring house to the targeted mother can use the technology against the mother and trick her into killing her children. The targeted mother will be carefully screened by the surveillance conducted by the agents before being selected to have the sonic technology used against her. Usually a mother with a history of mental illness is selected.

[/quote]

At the time I felt that there was more to the story of why she killed her kids, when she had just days before spoken out about how horrible it was for someone to kill a dog.

The story that I found is that of someone who worked for the postal service, the court trials claims that she lost her job due to problems with her co-workers and paranoid delusions about them. Where these the same time of paranoid delusions that Yvonne Hiller was having?



http://www.themorningstarr.co.uk/2009/01/08/mad-woman-escapes-jail/

[quote]

The court heard evidence from two psychiatrists who both agreed that Ms Hawes was suffering from schizophrenia. In early 2007 Ms Hawes began having paranoid delusions about her work colleagues which eventually led to her losing her job. She was prescribed anti-depressants in July 2007 but her paranoia increased and she began to hear voices which were controlling her actions.

In the days leading up to the double murder Ms Hawes was traveling around the country with her two children because she believed she was being pursued by something or someone. On November 29th 2007 she took a kitchen knife from her home and fled with her two children, when she reached a convenience store about a mile from her home she began to hear voices telling her to kill the children.

“I didn’t want them to have to run anymore,” Ms. Hawes told her psychiatrist. “I was trying to protect them … to stop them from being chased.

“I heard voices in the bathroom telling me to stab my kids.”

[/quote]

The post office is notorious for people going postal. My strong suspicion is that Hawes was placed on a Threat Assessment List for monitoring. She was likely given a level 3 or 2 threat level and thus her Gang Stalking and Electronic Harassment would have been peek. Level 2 being almost the highest level. This would have mean active monitoring, and everyone around her being alerted, it would have also meant that people would have been actively following her around, maybe even harassing her, irregardless of her having the two children in her possession.

This would corresponds with her fears of being on the run, and arming herself because she felt someone was out to do her harm. The voices might have been internal, but they could also have been very external and technology based, telling her to kill her children. This might help explain how she was able to so radically change and kill her children just a few short days later.


http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/2010/11/threat-assessment-101/

[quote]

PRIORITY 2 (High Risk): Poses threat of violence or self-harm but lacks immediacy or access to target. Requires active monitoring and case management plan.

PRIORITY 3 (Moderate Risk): Does not pose threat of violence or self harm, but exhibits significantly disruptive behaviors and/or need for assistance. Requires active monitoring, case management plan, and appropriate referrals.

[/qutoe]

Can I prove this is what happened? I might someday be able to prove that she was on a Threat Assessment List and thus followed around. I don’t know if I will be able to prove that remote neural monitoring in the form of voice to target transmission was employed, which helped and encouraged her to murder her two innocent children.

In any case Hawes has been written off as another Paranoid Schizophrenic, who was hearing voices, had paranoid beliefs and killed her children. No further investigation or evidence needed.


http://i296.photobucket.com/albums/mm190/projectnewera/jeanettehawes2.jpg

Let’s not forget the two innocent lives that were lost, if there is more to this story, we owe it to these two kids to find out the truth.

Gang Stalking Community Newsletter

Hi {Gang Stalking Community}, here the lastest news: Gang Stalking World Updates Updates will be back in the new year. In the mean time please enjoy the current content on the site. Emails will not be responded to until after the New Year. Thank you all for your patronage to the website, and I look forward to working with you in the New Year./">[...] Threat Assessment 101 It recently came to my attention that someone wrote a post titled “It’s not community notifications, either,” and this person thought that that they had discredited the theory of the Threat Assessment Teams and how they work./">[...] Bridging The Gap Average citizens are being placed under covert investigations. Could you be a target? NO? Guess again, you might be surprised who is being investigated and why? If you value your privacy learn how the game is being played. Informants are all around us./">[...] John St. Clair Akwei vs NASA John St. Clair Akwei vs NASA -A recap of this case from the early 90′s makes for very good reading. John St.Clair Akwei vs. NSA Ft George G. Meade, MD My knowledge of the National Security Agency’s structure, national security activities, proprietary technology, and covert operations to monitor individual citizens. http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/akwei.pdfEvidence for the Lawsuit filed [...] Gang Stalking vs Hollywood Star Whackers Randy Quaid is claiming to be a target of what he calls “Hollywood Star Whackers.” He claims that other stars on on a similar type of hit list. Stars such as Britney Spears, Mel Gibson, and ofcourse Lindsay Lohan. Randy Quaid claims that he has been followed around, and that he has been scammed out [...] Support The Websites That Support The Research For several years the Gang Stalking sites and Targeted Individual sites have been doing research to help Targeted Individuals, finding out what is behind Gang Stalking, how the networks are being set up and run. If you would like to support the research and service that has already been done, if you find it valuable then please support the sites and the research.[...] How did I become a target? How did I become a Target? Scenario 1 Work. Jane has been employed at Mcat Technotronics for several years, recently her and some co-workers have not been getting along. They have started rumors, moved her stuff around, and been hostile. Jane has complained to HR and finally an investigation was opened. All the co-workers denied [...] To unsubscribe click here.

Stagnation

Stagnation

I feel that some aspects of this mission are stagnating. In some ways I have done what was needed in exposing the upper echelon of what I believe is behind Gang Stalking, these Threat Assessment Teams then join forces with local appendages.

The local appendages are where you get all the strange and various different versions of what is behind Gang Stalking. Due to community oriented policing each area is governed differently, and when a target is stalked, they will be stalked in accordance to the area that they are in, so some areas it will be street gangs, others cults, other the mafia, others specific ethnic groups, or diametrically opposed groups, this could be also why some see criminals behind this, but others get chased by those in corporate suites, as I have pointed out, if you travel from one area to the next, one city to the next you will see the variations.

Some of these teams try to work as a group, so let's say they will try to coordinate and dress in something with a military theme, baseball hats, ribbons, missing hubcaps, things to let them know that they are working for the same team, tracking the same subject/target. It's all part of the lower monitoring process, that these teams use.

Anyways, I do feel in some areas a lot of progress has been made this year, but in other areas things have not progressed. I think when you are around the right people, the right places, the right circumstances come your way, and when you are not, well the opposite happens.

This year I have been lucky to feel that in spirit I was making the right progress and in the right places, but in flesh it's just continually been the opposite, and that has not changed. I have not found the right circumstances to appreciate my unique character as far as being in the right places are concerned. When you are in the right places, around the right people, things flow, the right ebb, everything goes well, since early last year this has been true in spirit, but in flesh it's the opposite and I need to fix that. Yes I know that I am being systemically destroyed, and the whole goal of that is to ensure that things don't go well, that things don't flow, but it is my belief that even with these odds stacked up against you, Karmically things can balance out if you are around the right people and places. Clearly I am not or there would be more of a flow.

Financially it's been a challenging year, and that has to change. The last several years have been challenging, and this year has been more so than most. For many of us, there is no rescue coming in this regard or this capacity. The only rescue is what we make for ourselves. There are lot's of people who want to offer aid and assistance, but if financial assistance is what you need, and that is not the aid being offered, then it does you little to no good. As I mentioned a well known author within the community has become homeless, and it's just made me realize that you can put a lot of effort into saving others, but sometimes you need to save yourself.

Someone did write in to say they had offered him a place to stay, but he has chosen to try the streets because for survival I think he realizes that his chances are better. It's really frustrating, because I know that over the years, I have been comforted by some of the material he has provided to this community, and it's frustrating because the assistance he needs is not something that I am able to offer at the moment, my circumstances are too close for comfort right now, and I really have to ensure that they stabilize. At times like these it's so easy to feel alone, even though I know there is a community, it's a community who's efforts at times support the shrill elements, while letting other elements out in the cold.

I am going to try to keep tabs, and hope he finds friends or others that he can stay with at least over the winter months, but having to share and live with others is still not a condition that any target really fancies seeing themselves in. Most of us are fairly independent, and as much fun as staying with friends and others can be, it also means giving up a great deal of independence, but most of us do not have huge resources that we can draw from, unlike many others.

On the other hand, I am sure that the truth is there, but many are reluctant to talk about it. For every break through like the Threat Assessment Teams, there is a drawback like Google suppressing the Gang Stalking search term.

The other target is very open, he has always been extremely explicit with describing all that they are doing to him, which I have always admired. I do share a lot of what is happening, but not all. There are some shocking abuses of power that I do not feel comfortable with sharing that are happening, but I know the risk that comes with being an activist and those are calculated risks that have to be taken if this is ever to be exposed.

So to sum things up, there are things that are going well, that are moving forward, but I have other things in my life that are stagnating, holding me back in a sense, preventing me from spreading my wings. I believe at my core that this happens when you are not aligning yourself with the forces or the resources that you need to align yourself with, so somewhere I need to take an introspective look at the things in my environment on all levels and assess what is not working, and correct that. So I am going to be spending some introspective time.

I feel that I have a lot of goodness inside that can be shared, but I also feel that a lot of that right now is being blocked and prevented, and I do wish to change this, so spiritually all that good that I have internally and I like to think that I have some left. I want to engender the circumstances that will allow that to come forth externally, that is my goal for the upcoming year. Yes I know, some wait till end of December for these little resolutions, but I like to strike while the iron is hot.

If you can do nothing else to be of assistance, then at least offer up your prayers at this time, they would be most appreciated.

John St. Clair Akwei vs NASA

Mr. Akwei use to work for NASA. He sued them. He says that they are capable of using remote neural monitoring to do a lot of really nasty things to innocent citizens. His case was from 90/91, so if they had this technology then as he has claimed, imagine what they can do now? Makes you wonder what the rush was to switch to the digital signal with the remote set top boxes, maybe it was not for watching targets in their home. If they have the technology that Akwei claims, then they could watch people in their homes through their brains with the right frequency. Hear what they hear, see what they see, and use the technology to program them. Read the case file, and the accusations, they are quite interesting, when you think about the fact that he says that some of this tech was in used since the 1940′s.

http://www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/akwei.pdf

Evidence for the Lawsuit filed at the US courthouse in Washington, D.C.

(Civil Action 92-0449)

John St.Clair Akwei vs. NSA Ft George G. Meade, MD

My knowledge of the National Security Agency’s structure, national security activities, proprietary technology, and covert operations to monitor individual citizens.

————————————————————————–

The NSA’s mission and the NSA’s domestic intelligence operations

Communications Intelligence (COMINT)

Blanket coverage of all electronic communication in the U.S. and the world to ensure national security. The NSA at Ft. Meade, Maryland has had the most advanced computers in the world since the early 1960′s. NSA technology is developed and implemented in secret from private corporations, academia, and the general public.

Signals Intelligence (SIGINT)

The Signals Intelligence mission of the NSA has evolved into a program of decoding EMF waves in the environment for wirelessly tapping into computers and tracking persons with the electrical currents in their bodies. Signals Intelligence is based on the fact that everything in the environment with an electric current in it has a magnetic flux around it which gives off EMF waves. The NSA/DoD has developed proprietary advanced digital equipment which can remotely analyze all objects whether man-made or organic that have electrical activity.

Domestic Intelligence (DOMINT)

The NSA has records on all U.S. citizens. The NSA gathers information on U.S. citizens who might be of interest to any of the over 50,000 NSA agents (HUMINT). These agents are authorized by executive order to spy on anyone. The NSA has a permanent National Security “anti-terrorist” surveillance network in place. This surveillance network is completely disguised and hidden from the public.

Tracking individuals in the U.S. is easily and cost-effectively implemented with the NSA’s electronic surveillance network. This network (DOMINT) covers the entire U.S., involves tens of thousands of NSA personnel, and tracks millions of persons simultaneously. Cost effective implementation of operations is assured by NSA computer technology designed to minimize operations costs.

NSA personnel serve in quasi-public positions in their communities and run cover businesses and legitimate businesses that can inform the intelligence community of persons they would want to track. N.S.A. personnel in the community usually have cover identities such as social workers, lawyers and business owners.

Individual citizens occasionally targeted for surveillance by independently operating NSA personnel

NSA personnel can control the lives of hundreds of thousands of individuals in the U.S. by using the NSA’s domestic intelligence network and cover businesses. The operations independently run by them can sometimes go beyond the bounds of law. Long-term control and sabotage of tens of thousands of unwitting citizens by NSA operatives is likely to happen. NSA Domint has the ability to covertly assassinate U.S. citizens or run covert psychological control operations to cause subjects to be diagnosed with ill mental health.

NSA’s domestic electronic surveillance network

As of the early 1960′s the most advanced computers in the world were at the NSA, Ft. Meade. Research breakthroughs with these computers were kept for the NSA. At the present time the NSA has nanotechnology computers that are 15 years ahead of present computer technology.

The NSA obtains blanket coverage of information in the U.S. by using advanced computers that use artificial intelligence to screen all communications, irregardless of medium, for key words that should be brought to the attention of NSA agents/cryptologists. These computers monitor all communications at the transmitting and receiving ends. This blanket coverage of the U.S. is a result of the NSA’s Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) mission.

The NSA’s electronic surveillance network is based on a cellular arrangement of devices that can monitor the entire EMF spectrum. This equipment was developed, implemented, and kept secret in the same manner as other electronic warfare programs.

With this technology NSA personnel can non-obtrusively tap into any communication device in existence. This includes computers, telephones, radio and video-based devices, printers, car electronics, and even the minute electrical fields in humans (for tracking individuals).

Signals Intelligence remote computer tampering

The NSA keeps track of all PCs and other computers sold in the U.S. This is an integral part of the Domestic Intelligence network.

The NSA’s EMF equipment can tune in RF emissions from personal computer circuit boards (while filtering out emissions from monitors and power supplies). The RF emission from PC circuit boards contains digital information in the PC. Coded RF waves from the NSA’s equipment can resonate PC circuits and change data in the PC’s. Thus the NSA can gain wireless modem-style entry into any computer in the country for surveillance or “anti-terrorist” electronic warfare.

Radio and television signals can be substituted at the receiving end with special EMF equipment. Replacing signals in radios and televisions is another outgrowth of the NSA’s Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) mission.

Detecting EMF fields in humans for surveillance

A subject’s bioelectric field can be remotely detected, so subjects can be monitored anywhere they are. With special EMF equipment, NSA cryptologists can remotely read evoked potentials (from EEGs). These can be decoded into a person’s brain-states and thoughts. The subject is then perfectly monitored from a distance.

NSA personnel can dial up any individual in the country on the Signals lntelligence EMF scanning network and the NSA’s computers will then pinpoint and track that person 24 hours-a-day. The NSA can pick out and track anyone in the U.S.

NSA’s Signals Intelligence use of EMF brain stimulation

NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF brain stimulation for Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL). EMF Brain Stimulation has been in development since the MK Ultra program of the early 1950′s, which included neurological research into “radiation” (non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development. The resulting secret technology is categorized at the National Security Archives as “Radiation Intelligence,” defined as “information from unintentionally emanated electromagnetic waves in the environment, not including radioactivity or nuclear detonation.”

Signals Intelligence implemented and kept this technology secret in the same manner as other electronic warfare programs of the U.S. government. The NSA monitors available information about this technology and withholds scientific research from the public. There are also international intelligence agency agreements to keep this technology secret.

The NSA has proprietary electronic equipment that analyzes electrical activity in humans from a distance. NSA computer-generated brain mapping can monitor all the electrical activity in the brain continuously. The NSA records aid decodes individual brain maps (of hundreds of thousands of persons) for national security purposes. EMF Brain Stimulation is also secretly used by the military for Brain-to-computer link (in military fighter aircraft, for example).

For electronic surveillance purposes, electrical activity in the speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject’s verbal thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain’s auditory cortex thus allowing audio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the ears). NSA operatives can use this to covertly debilitate subjects by simulating auditory hallucinations, characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.

Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject’s brain and show images from the subject’s brain on a video monitor. NSA operatives see what the surveillance subject’s eyes are seeing. Visual memory can also be seen. RNM can send images direct to the visual cortex, bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. NSA operatives can use this to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject’s brain while they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes.

Capabilities of NSA operatives using RNM

There has been a Signals Intelligence network in the U.S. since the 1940′s. The NSA, Ft. Meade, has in place a vast two-way wireless RNM system which is used to track subjects and non-invasively monitor audio-visual information in their brain. This is all done with no physical contact with the subject. RNM is the ultimate method of surveillance and domestic intelligence. Speech, 3D sound, and subliminal audio can be sent to the auditory cortex of the subject’s brain (bypassing the ears), and images can be sent into the visual cortex. RNM can alter a subject’s perceptions, moods, and motor control.

Speech cortex/auditory cortex link has become the ultimate communications system for the intelligence community. RNM allows for a complete audio-visual brain-to-brain link or brain-to-computer link.

National Security Agency Signals Intelligence Electronic Brain Link technology

NSA SigInt can remotely detect, identify and monitor a person’s bioelectric fields. The NSA’s Signals Intelligence has the proprietary ability to remotely and non-invasively monitor information in the human brain by digitally decoding the evoked potentials in the 30-50 hz, .5 milliwatt electro-magnetic emissions from the brain.

Neuronal activity in the brain creates a shifting electrical pattern that has a shifting magnetic flux. This magnetic flux puts out a constant 30-50 hz, .5 milliwatt electromagnetic (EMF) wave. Contained in the electromagnetic emission from the brain are spikes and patterns called “evoked potentials.”

Every thought, reaction, motor command, auditory event, and visual image in the brain has a corresponding “evoked potential” or set of “evoked potentials.” The EMF emission from the brain can be decoded into the current thoughts, images, and sounds in the subject’s brain.

NSA SigInt uses EMF-transmitted brain stimulation as a communications system to transmit information (as well as nervous system messages) to intelligence agents and also to transmit to the brains of covert operations subjects (on a non-perceptible level).

EMF Brain Stimulation works by sending a complexly coded and pulsed electromagnetic signal to trigger evoked potentials (events) in the brain, thereby forming sound and visual images in the brain’s neural circuits. As previously noted, EMF Brain Stimulation can also change a person’s brain-states and affect motor control.

Two-way Electronic Brain-Link is done by remotely monitoring neural audio-visual information while transmitting sound to the auditory cortex (bypassing the ears) and transmitting faint images to the visual cortex (bypassing the optic nerves and eyes, the images appear as floating 2D screens in the brain).

Two-Way Electronic Brain Link has become the ultimate communications system for CIA/NSA personnel. Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM, remotely monitoring bioelectric information in the human brain) has become the ultimate surveillance system. It is used by a limited number of agents in the U.S. intelligence community.

RNM requires decoding the resonance frequency of each specific brain area. That frequency is then modulated in order to impose information in that specific brain area. The frequency to which the various brain areas respond varies from 3 hz to 50 hz. Only NSA Signals Intelligence modulates signals in this frequency band.

An example of EMF Brain Stimulation:

[Brain area-bioelectric resonance/ frequency/ information induced through modulation]

• Motor control cortex/ 10 hz/ motor impulse co-ordination

• Auditory cortex/ 15 hz/ sound which bypasses the ears

• Visual cortex/ 25 hz/ images in the brain, bypassing the eyes

• Somatosensory cortex/ 9 hz/ phantom touch sense

• Thought center/ 20 hz/ imposed subconscious thoughts

This modulated information can be put into the brain at varying intensities, from subliminal to perceptible.

Each person’s brain has a unique set of bioelectric resonance/entrainment frequencies. Sending audio information to a person’s brain at the frequency of another person’s auditory cortex would result in that audio information not being perceived.

The Plaintiff learned of RNM by being in two-way RNM contact with the Kinnecome group at the NSA, Ft. Meade. They used RNM 3D sound direct to the brain to harass the Plaintiff from 10/90 to 5/91. As of 5/91 they have had two-way RNM communications with the Plaintiff and have used RNM to attempt to incapacitate the Plaintiff and hinder the Plaintiff from going to authorities about their activities against the Plaintiff in the last twelve years.

The Kinnecome group has about 100 persons working 24-hours-a-day at Ft Meade. They have also brain-tapped persons the Plaintiff is in contact with to keep the Plaintiff isolated. This is the first time ever that a private citizen has been harassed with RNM and has been able to bring a lawsuit against NSA personnel misusing this intelligence operations method.

NSA Techniques and Resources

Remote monitoring/tracking of individuals in any location, inside any building, continuously, anywhere in the country. A system for inexpensive implementation of these operations allows for thousands of persons in every community to be spied on constantly by the NSA.

Remote RNM devices

• NSA’s RNM equipment remotely reads the evoked potentials (EEGs) of the human brain for tracking individuals, and can send messages through the nervous system to affect their performance.

• [Information missing from original]

• RNM can electronically identify individuals and track them anywhere in the U.S. This equipment is based on a network and is used for domestic intelligence operations, government security, military base security, and in case of bioelectric warfare.

Spotters and walk-bys in metropolitan areas

• Tens of thousands of persons in each area working as spotters and neighborhood/business place spies (sometimes unwittingly), following and checking on subjects who have been identified for covert control by NSA personnel.

• Agents working out of offices can be in constant communication with spotters who are keeping track of the NSA’s thousands of surveillance subjects in public.

• NSA Agents in remote offices can instantly identify (using RNM) any individual spotter in public whom is in contact with a surveillance subject.

Chemicals and drugs into residential buildings with hidden NSA-installed and maintained plastic plumbing lines

• The NSA has kits for running lines into residential tap water and air ducts of subjects for the delivery of drugs (such as sleeping gas or brainwashing aiding drugs). This is an outgrowth of CIA pharmapsychology.

Brief overview of proprietary U.S. intelligence/”anti-terrorist” equipment mentioned

• Fixed network of special EMF equipment that can read EEGs in human brains and identify/track individuals by using digital computers.

• ESB (Electrical Stimulation to the Brain) via EMF signal from the NSA Signals Intelligence is used to control subjects.

• EMF equipment that gathers information from PC circuit boards by deciphering RF emissions, thereby gaining wireless modem-style entry into any personal computer in the country.

All equipment hidden, all technology secret, all scientific research unreported (as in electronic warfare research). Not known to the public at all, yet complete and thorough implementation of this method of domestic intelligence has been in place since the early 1980′s.

————————————————————————–

Resources

These publications have only been discovered since December 1991, after the Plaintiff had already notified authorities (Dept. of Justice and others) of Public Corruption by named NSA employees. When no action was taken against the NSA employees, the Plaintiff researched the intelligence community electronic surveillance technology involved and discovered the following publications:

• The Body Electric-Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, by Robert Becker

P. 265/313/318, monitoring neuroelectric information in the brain; EM waves/ESB.

• Cross Currents, by Robert Becker, M.D.

P. 70/78/105/210/216/220/242/299/303, EM ESB; simulating auditory hallucinations; p. 274, remote computer tampering using the RF emissions from the logic board.

• Currents of Death, by Paul Brodeur

P. 27/93, driving brain electrical activity with external EM; magnetophosphenes; Dr. Delgado.

• The Zapping of America, by Paul Brodeur

DoD EM ESB research; simulating auditory hallucinations.

• Of Mice, Men and Molecules, by John H. Heller (1963)

P. 110, bioelectricity; probing the brain with EM waves.

• The 3-Pound Universe, by Judith Hooper

P. 29/132/137, CIA’s EEG research; EEG for surveillance.

• In the Palaces of Memory, by George Johnson

EM emissions from the brain; the brain as an open electromagnetic circuit.

• The Puzzle Palace, by James Bamford

Signals intelligence, most advanced computers in the early Sixties; the U.S. intelligence community – glossary of terms at National Security archives; Radiation Intelligence –information from unintentionally emanated electromagnetic energy, excluding radioactive sources.

• The Search for the “Manchurian Candidate,” by John Marks

P. 327, electrical or radio stimulation to the brain; CIA R&D in bioelectrics.

• Secret Agenda, by Jim Hougan

National Security cult groups.

• Crimes of the Intelligence Community, by Morton Halperin

Surreptitious entries; intelligence agents running operations against government workers.

• War in the Age of Intelligent Machines

NSA computer supremacy; complete control of information; alternate computers, by Time-Life Books.

• The Mind, by Richard Restak, M.D.

P. 258, EEG Systems Inc.; decoding brain EM emanations; tracking thoughts on a computer.

• MedTech, by Lawrence Gallon

Triggering events in the brain directly to auditory cortex signals.

• Cyborg, by D.S. Halacy, Jr. (1965)

Brain-to-computer link research contracts given out by the U.S. govemment.

• Psychiatry and the C.I.A.: Victims of Mind Control, by Harvey M. Weinstein, M.D.

Dr. Cameron; psychic driving; ultraconceptual communications.

• Journey Into Madness: The True Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse, by Gordon Thomas

P. 127/276/116/168-69, intelligence R&D; Dr. Delgado; psychic driving with radio telemetry.

• Mind Manipulators, by Alan Scheflin and Edward M. Opton

MK ULTRA brain research for information gathering.

• The Brain Changers, by Maya Pines

P. 19, listening to brain EM emissions.

Further Resources

• Modern Bielectricity

Inducing audio in the brain with EM waves; DoD cover-up; EM waves/ESB; remote EEGs.

• Magnetic Stimulation in Clinical Neurophysiology, by Sudhansu Chokroverty

Magneto-phosphenes; images direct to the visual cortex.

• The Mind of Man, by Nigel Calder

U.S. intelligence brain research; Neuroelectric Society conference – 1971; audio direct to the brain with EM waves; two way remote EEG.

• Brain Control, by Elliot S. Valenstein

ESB control of individuals.

• Towards 21st Century, by C.S. Wallia

P. 21, brain stimulation for direct brain-to-brain communication.

• Mind Wars, by Ron McRae (associate of Jack Anderson)

P 62/106/136, research into brain-to-brain electronic communications; remote neural EM detection.

• Mind Tools, by Rudy Rucker

Brain tapping; communication with varying biomagnetic fields. P. 82, U.S. News and world report (01/02/84); p. 88, EM wave brain stimulation; intelligence community high tech.

• Ear Magazine article on extremely low frequency radio emissions in the natural environment; radio emissions from the human body.

• City Paper article on FCC and NSA “complete radio spectrum” listening posts (01/17/92)

• Frontiers in Science, by Edward Hutchings, Jr. (1958)

P. 48

• Beyond Biofeedback, by Elmer and Alyce Green (1977)

P. 118

• The Body Quantum, by Fred Alan Wolf

• Cloning – A Biologist Report, by Robert Gilmore McKinnell

Ethical review of cloning humans.

• Hoover’s FBI, by former agent William Turner

P. 280, routines of electronic surveillance work.

• July 20, 2019, by Arthur C. Clarke

Lida; neurophonics; brain-to-computer link.

• Mega Brain, by Michael Hutchinson

P. 107/108/117/120/123, brain stimulation with EM waves; CIA research and information control.

• The Cult of Information, by Theodore Rosnak (1986)

NSA Directive #145; personal files in computers; computer automated telephone tapping.

• The Body Shop

1968 implantation of an electrode array on the visual cortex for video direct to the brain and other 1960s research into electronically triggering phosphenes in the brain, thus bypassing the eyes.

• Evoked Potentials, by David Regan

Decoding neuroelectric information in the brain.

“Internet of Things”

“Internet of Things”

How many targets are there online?

I keep seeing some really inflated numbers. Now you will get to meet more targets online than you do offline, but if you really believe the majority of people online are targets then you would be wrong.

A lot of these groups, sites, blogs, and posters are citizen informants. Their goals are at times to find out things like the identity of targets, which cities they live in, and other details. They keep the illusion going, and most importantly they ensure that nothing real get’s done. They waste the time of real targets.

Many of them are good at pretending to be real targets, real orgainzations, and when called out they fake shock, and aw, oh but I am a real target, how could you say that, and on it goes. They form these interconnected networks and most times support themselves, promote themselves, and the worst thing they do is suck up the resources that should go to legitimate organization. Thus ensuring legit sites suffer, while their parasitic intellegnce opperations florish. I have seen this across many parts of the internet, not just within the Targeted Individual community, but with other communities. They also waste the time of genuine activists. Some of them use to be real targets and now they are working a double agenda, or just working for the other side.

I don’t know what the true numbers are, of real targets vs fake shrills pretending to be targets, but 90-95% of the sites, blogs, initiatives are fake, and were there to ensure that only specific information came to light, or that if something significant happens, or the movement progresses, they take credit for it without doing anything. Watching how this works across the board is annoying, but it’s the people that make it work so what can you do.

From what I have seen people would rather be a part of a group initiative, even if it’s something they know is fake, rather than be off by themselves, or part of something that is not being portrayed as grand. From what I can see it works everytime, and across the board the shrill money making, resource sucking opperations are taking over, while the legit sites are falling by the way side.

Even outside of activsm and online movements, you have large name companies that are taking over, the very search engines used are controlled. Ensuring that specific terms are blacklisted out, hard to find, or that some results just never see the light of day. Soon these same companies will be inside of your homes, not just as your search engines, but as your connection to the web, and your T.V. that you watch. It’s small scale now, but 10 years from now, this might be one of the few companies or the only company you connect to the internet with, who’s T.V. get’s used.

http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/21/google-tv-everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know/

http://www.pcworld.com/article/189066/googles_ultrafast_broadband_questions_and_answers.html

You have specific social networking sites that are really taking over, and the control has been so great, that they want to branch out offline. They now want to have initiatives like an open id, but for all offline phones so that when they download an application it’s just one login, sounds great and really convient in theory, but not if the resource is controlled by one company. A company that has played very loose with privacy.

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-11/04/facebook-mobile-platform

http://www.technofascismblog.com/2010/11/03/internet-of-things-is-on-the-way-1252.html

“Internet of Things.” And what is the “Internet of Things?” Well, from the perspective of the vast spy agencies, the internet has one fatal flaw: if you’re not on it, they can’t spy on you. Bummer. So, to get around this little inconvenience of privacy, the latest push is to get every physical object in the world online. That’s right. Everything from your car, to your toaster, will eventually be connected and controllable through the internet. It seems that the Gods on Mount Olympus have had such great success with the virtual world that they now want to bring everything into it. And that means more control for them and less freedom for everyone else.

The latest marketing-speak word from the architects of the “Internet of Things” at IBM is “smart.” So, in the near future, when the CIA can log into any device you own–from your toothbrush to your bookshelf–and determine who’s been using them and when and where, that’s not an invasion of privacy–it’s “smart.” Of course, in reality this is only “smart” for the temporary controllers of the machine world. For the rest of us the “Internet of Things” is not only dumb, it’s the next logical step to automating the entire planet under the control of a single machine intelligence. Fun times ahead!

I think that the internet has been a success. So successful infact at controlling the masses, that they want to take what has worked online, and use the same to control them offline. It’s hard to see it now but in just 10 years from one, you could have one big corporation in control and in charge of your internet access, the equipment you use to access the internet, and then once online, or even offline, they and their cohorts, control the content you have access to, and even the applications you use.

People are predictable, they like convience, and we will slowly enslave ourselves over time, with these companies having to put forward very little effort. If you build it they will come.

I always thought it was weird that the military decided to share the internet with humanity, a wonderful accident that allowed us all to progress and advance so far in such a short space of time, but I am looking ahead, and I see the tool that once offered a great deal of freedom, has the equal capacity to offer humanity, control, confomrity, and enslavement only previosly dreamed possible.

Threat Assessments 101

Threat Assessment 101

It recently came to my attention that someone wrote a post titled “It’s not community notifications, either,” and this person thought that that they had discredited the theory of the Threat Assessment Teams and how they work.

I had not previously realized the limited understanding some targets have of these teams and how they are used and how they function. I thought I would address the issue in a post titled Threat Assessment 101, and try to help the community understand how this process works a bit better. Try to apply the stages below to your own targeting, if you have any questions, please feel free to drop a line, and I will do my best to answer the question.

I do not claim to be an expert, but I do like to believe my years of research have been a bit more detailed and indeepth, compared to what some others have done.

Now the person wrote a post where he believes that he has discredited Jane Clift as a Targeted Individual because her stalking ended after she moved, and she was advised that she was to be added to the notification, but what this poster did in reality is akeen to saying, well person X does not have electronic harasssment therefore they are not a Targeted Individual, or or person B is not getting Voice To Skull so they must not be a Targeted Individual.

It shows that this person does not have an understanding of how the process works. If this person is having a hard time with the concept then other targets are also likely having the same difficuluties and I hope that this will clearify some of that.

I am going to start with how the team works.

The threat assessment team works in a four part process.

1. Identify persons of concern
2. Gather information/investigate
3. Assess information and situation
4. Manage the situation

In the case of Mrs. Clift it was her local council that was responsible for the task of evaluating individuals and placing them on the list. In other cases this will be done via a Threat Assessment Team or similar out let.

In the Jane Clift case she was identified as a person of interest because of a letter that she wrote.

Each team does things differently. But they go about gathering information as part of the next stage.

Triage questions can include:

• Has there been indications of suicidal thoughts,
plans, or attempts?
• Has there been indications of thoughts/plans of
violence?
• Does the person have access to a weapon or are
they trying to gain access?
• Are there concerns about the well-being of the
subject?

• Are there concerns about the safety of the
community?
• If yes, a full inquiry is recommended.

Gather Information (Full Inquiry)
• Think broadly and creatively about those who
might have information:

• Co-workers
• Other staff
• Friends
• Family
• Online friends, web sites, etc.
• Previous schools / employers
• Others?
• Document information and use it to answer the
Key Investigative Questions.

Threat Assessment Teams when gathering information speak to those around you, as listed above. They speak to your friends, family, co-workers, online friends, websites, etc. Places that you frequent. This is why those around the target become involved in what is ongoing.

In the Jane Clift case they would have reviewed her history and decided that she was likely someone they felt comfortable with issuing a letter letting her know that she was going to be on a list. Most people are never issued letters, again everyones targeting will be different, and have various levels. Some targets never get electronic harassment or voice to skull.

In the Jane Clift case it was decided that no further active monitoring was needed once she left the area. In other cases these teams or individuals will often decide that further monitoring is needed to ensure the safety of the community, and once the person leave the area the monitoring will continue.

In the Jane Clift case they felt that her anger had primarily been directed at individuals in her local council, so once she left, they felt safe enough to not have her further listed. If they did not feel safe she would have been followed in other areas, like many other targets are.

2. Have there been any communications
suggesting ideas or intent to attack?
• What, if anything, has the person
communicated to someone else (targets,
friends, co-workers, others) or written in a
diary, journal, email, or Web site concerning
his or her grievances, ideas and/or intentions?
• Has anyone been alerted or “warned away”?
Source: U.S. Secret Service and U.S. Department of Education, (2002)
Guide to Managing Threatening Situations and Creating Safe School Climates.
Key Investigative Questions

I can not strees this part of the targeting enough. They do communicate with everyone around the target. So when targets say that everyone is in on it. They are fully correct. They are not allowed to say anything to the person being investigated. Also it’s scary because they become aware of how serious the situation is. The target depending on which level of monitoring they are on, will have their information distributed to the community. Anyone who is a part of these community, workplace, notification, initiatives, will then get a warning about the person.

Information Sharing: FERPA

• FERPA is not an impediment to effective threat
assessment and case management.
• FERPA governs records only, not observations,
communications, etc.
• FERPA does not govern police records.
• If created & maintained by law enforcement, for
law enforcement purpose.
• New guidance from ED encourages information
sharing where public safety is a concern.
• FERPA does not permit a private right of action.

Information Sharing: HIPAA
• Check with legal counsel as to which laws
govern counseling center records.
• Confidentiality is held by client, not MH provider.
• In cases where privacy laws apply, can try these
strategies:
• No legal prohibition against providing
information to health/MH professionals.
• Inquire about Tarasoff – type duty.
• Ask subject for permission to disclose.

Record Keeping
• Centralized incident tracking database;
• Document reports and actions – include date,
time, subjects, targets, behaviors of concern,
witnesses;
• Data;
• Assessment;
• Plan;
• Preserve evidence: Keep copies of email,
memos, etc.
Record Keeping
Incident tracking database;
• Incident Information:
• Date, location, nature of incident, means of approach;
• Subject information:
• Name, DOB, sex, description, affiliation, status, etc.
• Target / Victim Information;
• Name, DOB, sex, description, affiliation, status, etc.
• Witness/Reporting Party Information:
• Name, DOB, sex, description, affiliation, status, etc.

In a nutshell they bypass privacy laws that would normally be in place, which allows them to have those around you spy on you and give their observations and communications. Very cleaver.

This also means that strangers, and those with grudges, those who want to keep the investigation opened, such as those in the community getting paid, can have anyone submit false information. Let’s say you were originally given 18 months or 5 years on one of these lists, if there are no incedents, or something significant happens in your life, they might close the case file. If on the other hand something extreme happens, such as these people provoke you into punching them out, or falsely report that you did, then that is more time added more monitoring.

Think creatively about resources, as well as
“eyes and ears.”
• Anticipate likely change in the short and midterm,
and how the subject may react.
• Monitor using available resources. Who sees
the person regularly, inside work/campus,
outside, on weekends, online, etc.?

People need to understand that this becomes like a full Stasi investigation. For those around the target many with nothing better to do, this can become addictive and fun, some people love to play spy, and if there is a target in their area a lot of them will sit and wait for reports to come in, and if the target is in the area, they run to the bus stop, cause they want to see an incident go down. A lot of people just have no lives. Others are just genuenly scared and when the community notifications go out, danger to self or others medium risk, only to be seen in pairs, or whatever is being reported, others are just looking to protect themselves or their communities.

While the case is open the team should:

• Continue to monitor and modify the plan as long as the individual still poses a threat

• Recognize that a person can continue to pose a threat even after he/she ceases to be a Closing a Case
member of the campus community

• Continue to monitor the situation through its relationship with local law enforcement agencies and mental health agencies, as well as in direct cooperation with the person, if possible

As the threat assessment team work your file, and reports come in, reports can either bring down your threat level, or increase your threat level, they continue to monitor you, as long as they feel you are a threat, or that there is something in your life that makes you less of a threat enough for them to close your file, and your file even when closed, can be reopened, or the previous records accessed. Everything is going and starting to be feed into central databases, similar to fusion centers.

If someone who has been reviewed by the Threat Assessment Team leaves the area, do you continue to monitor him/her?

If the situation warrants reviewing the case after the subject leaves the area, the team will continue to do so. It is important to remember that when the subject has relationships in his/her life, there is a lesser chance for violence to occur. A failure to communicate or interact with a subject encourages problems to fester, which could lead to violence.

Again in the Jane Clift case, she left and her monitoring stopped because the coucil only felt that she was a threat to that one area, but in most other cases, they will warn everyone and every area that you come in contact with, because it is felt that you could be a danger to any area.

Assessment: Case Priority Levels

PRIORITY 1 (Extreme Risk): Poses clear/immediate threat of violence or self-harm and requires immediate containment, law enforcement involvement, target protection, and case management plan.

PRIORITY 2 (High Risk): Poses threat of violence or self-harm but lacks immediacy or access to target. Requires active monitoring and case management plan.

PRIORITY 3 (Moderate Risk): Does not pose threat of violence or self harm, but exhibits significantly disruptive behaviors and/or need for assistance. Requires active monitoring, case management plan, and appropriate referrals.

PRIORITY 4 (Low Risk): Does not pose threat of violence or self-harm at this time, but may exhibit some disruptive behavior and/or need for assistance. Requires passive monitoring. Utilize case management and referrals as appropriate.

PRIORITY 5 (No Identified Risk): Does not pose threat of violence or self-harm nor is there evidence of disruption to community. No case management or monitoring required.

The above chart is the most important thing that targets need to understand about their targeting. Most of us are on what is called active monitoring, but we can slip down to passive monitoring, or up to higher levels. I believe most targets who notice the surveillance fall into the Priority 3, 4, or 5.

This means active monitoring and they feel that you could be a threat. The active monitoring is where we are likely to notice the Gang Stalking and Gang Stalking activities as the community has termed it.

Now on their blog the person wrote, that no one broke into Jane Clifts house, nobody vandalized her belongings, and nobody assaulted her. That may or may not be accurate. There is a lot that was not said about the case, what is known is that Jane even though she was aware of the listing, the social ostercism, being followed to places she was not followed before, and other factors became so bad that she had to move. Remember she did not want to move, she had to move, she infact hopes to move back there someday. It was her home, she loved it, and hoped to be a foster parent, but being on the list absolutely disrupted her life and seriously enough that she moved.

The reality is the poster in the post that I read assumes a lot about the Jane Clift case, we don’t know the full extent to what Jane experienced. Eg. There are aspects of my own targeting that will not be publically mentioned, but it does not mean that they did not occur. What the poster of the article entiled “It’s not community notifications, either” fails deeply to understand about the targeting is that every target get’s different levels of harassment. Some will be followed, but never notice the Gang Stalking till several years into the targeting. How many times online have you seen a target write that when they checked their diaries or journals they realised that the targeting had actually gone back several years, but they had never put the pieces together? Eg. The targeting at the time was there, but not bad enough for them to notice, meaning that they were likely under passive forms of monitoring, which then slipped into active forms of monitoring.

That is likely when you noticed the mood in the community change, when you noticed the home break in’s, the harassment, and on higher priority of monitoring and targeting, that is also likely where you noticed the electronic harassment, vs just Gang Stalking. It’s all part of how these teams function. The young man in his post felt that he had discredited the notion, but the post just showed how limited his understanding was of these teams work and function in relationship to our targeting.

Once you have the most basic understanding of how these threat assessment teams work, and function, you can likely see how this is working in your own life, and the life of other targets.

Again the poster of the article felt that targets had to act out in the workplace to run afoul of anti-violence initiatives, again this poster has no idea of how zero tolerance is now working, how the psychiatric repirsials are working in conjunction with these teams. You do not have to act out, constantly complain about harassment, and you can be added to one of these lists, and be listed as having a mental health issue, this is the point that must get across to Targeted Individuals and others, this is what is happening in many cases, thus we see a lot of whistle blowers. In the community arguing with an authority figure could get you on such a list, it does not take as much as most people think it does.

Now as the research continues, I hope to introduce targets to the opperations manuals that are used for the remote monitoring, that should hopefully shed some additional light on some of the targeting that is experienced, but please feel free to do your own research in the mean time. Unlike others I do not claim to be an expert and my research into these teams continue.

I hope this gives most Targeted Inidividuals a basic understasnding of how Threat Assessment Teams work. If you truly understand the process, then you have a better idea of what is happening behind the targeting.

So let’s look at some cases.

1. Theresa Duncan. She had a workplace altercation where she had to be escorted from her building. This was the second altercation with the same individual, but they blamed Theresa. Under these violence prevention programs the incidents must be reported.

As everyone knows Theresa Duncan went on to blame her targeting on Scientology, complained of conspiracies, and she and her boyfriend Jeremy Blake later both died, listed as suicides, but many believe they were murdered.

If Ms. Duncan was evaluated as a threat to the company after her outburst and escort from the building, that could have cause passive, or active monitoring. Then start to blame a community or show a belief that they are out to get you, and these teams will increase the monitoring, and inform everyone around you, thus you notice this conspiracy and accuse everyone of being in on it. She thought it was Scientology, but the reality is that it likely began with the workplace incident. I am not discounting this group in any of her targeting, because depending on your area, each area uses different types of groups, and individuals for the monitoring. If she felt Scientologists were after her, the Threat Assessment Team would alert this group, and they would be thrown in her path without a doubt.

2. Randy Quaid. He had an incident where he upsent some coworkers. They filed a complaint and he was banned from the actors union. Now he has never said he is a Targeted Individual, but assuming that he is, this incident likely lead to his elevated Threat level and thus noticeable targeting. After he was banned, a restraining order was I believe filed against his spouse, so the company likely had them placed on active monitoring.

His brother has suggested he get a mental health exam. This is likely because he is hoping an exam will clear his brother. Most times those around you can not say anything. They believe that the system is legit and will clear the target if they get a mental health check. Unfortunately this is not always the case. Targets know that the system and company paid psychiatrist can and are often used to list targets as mentally unwell.

If Randy is a target, he was likely at some point evaluated and listed as having a mental illness. They do this and can do this legally. It’s wrong, but this is what targets have to realize. Please see the article entitled the psychiatric reprisal if you are unclear how this process works, and how someone can be listed as mentally ill without having a face to face exam.

3. Gloria Naylor. She accidentally poisoned her neighbors cat. They had been arguing for a while, having disputes, so the woman felt that it had been done on purpose. Well in that area if they felt that you deliberately murdered a pet, and well what about a person, what if you did the same to a person? Remember pets to many are like family members. The neighbor according to Gloria had connections, but the reality is even if she did not have connections, but a deep concern, and in an area like that a report, and a review of the history could have started passive, or active monitoring depending on what was reported.

The rest is as they say history. I don’t know if Gloria had anything else going on, if this woman had anyone else file a report, but at some point after this incident Gloria noticed the small things, started to complain, they likely listed her as paranoid, higher threat level, higher forms of monitoring, and so forth.

4. Ramona Lopez. She was trying to stop people from selling drugs. She realized the cops were in on it and essentially blew the whistle. Well Ramona depending on where you live, accusing the cops of dealing drugs is a paranoid disorder. We all know the police would never do that. Anyways, she also I think reported being set up for drugs, she argued with the cop if I recall correctly, which can get you listed as EDP. Emotionally Disturbed Person. Infact most of the times when we file these reports with the cops, if you get your records, you might just see them listed as EDP, no further action needed at this time.

A Targeted Individual recently posted his police report, and his complaint about the neighbor above burning him with lasers, got him listed as EDP and referred for mental health. Apparently being burnt from the neighbor above is an impossible scenario.

Remember he was reporting something simple and got listed as EDP, and referred for psychiatric assessment. Ramona Lopez was crossing the blue wall of death and in many areas, especially less affluent areas, you just can’t do that. Reporting the police as selling drugs is a paranoid belief, or so it would have been listed. Anyways she reports her targeting started shortly after trying to blow the whistle, and the rest is history. The more she complained, the more she acted out, the worst it got.

These are just a few cases, I am not an expert, I do not at this moment have conclusive proof that this is exactly how the targeting happening, but when you understand how these teams work, you can go back and get a pretty good idea of what started the targeting and why, and how these teams view the target.

The same is true for Gang Stalking, once you understand how Gang Stalking works, you can hear a target complain about surveillance, being followed, life disruptions, and get a pretty good idea or feel that this is what is likely what is happening to the target. I hope this has given some a better understanding of Threat Assessment Teams and how they work in relationship to Gang Stalking.

Working Hard so you don’t have to

Working Hard so you don’t have to

I have been working deligently to get Targeted Individuals the information that they seek. To this end I have been in touch with legal services for Threat Assessment Organizations, and even law enforcement. I wanted to get a better understanding of how these teams worked, and the community monitoring. Before I do there are a couple of quick points I wanted to touch base on.

Indigo Ribbon Month

Now before I get to this I wanted to say it’s November so it’s Indigo Ribbon Month, place your ribbons on your websites, wear them in public, or where ever you think is applicable. If you don’t have your buttons you can get them at the store.

http://www.zazzle.com/gangstalking

Randy Quaid and Gang Stalking

Now this story has taken a bit of time away from some of the issues that I wanted to focus on, but I remember that Jeremy Blake and Theresa Duncan at one time sought help. I don’t think they ever discovered the Gang Stalking World website or they might have developed some strategies that might have assisted them. I don’t know, but they were lost, and I really would like to see the Quaids get through this.

I want to thank the posters online who have taken the time to say keep an open mind to this story, or to point out that Gang Stalking does happen, and that their story is either similar or identical to what others are going through.

The Quaids have not expressed or identified themselves as Targeted Individuals, but I know many have protectively welcomed them and embraced them, and I know that many will be keeping an eye on the story. Gang Stalking World was the first in the Targeted Individual community to see a possible link, and to report the story, and will try to keep the community updated in the coming days.

Threat Assessment Teams and F.O.I.A.

Recently I posted about discovering a clause that would prevent these teams from sharing the information under Freedom Of Information and I wanted to find out some more information, so I got in touch with some of the teams. I heard back from legal and police officials regarding the various policies.

The request really seem to differ from organization to organization. Eg. Some do allow you to make the request and will release information, many others hide or squirrell the information away under school or workplace security and thus the files are not stored in the employment records, or school records, but are stored as company security files, to which you do not or can not have access.

In these cases I think it would be good to try to use the available resources to gain access to those records.

This is what I found out. Threat Assessment Team records are part of a student’s education record, and are governing not by FOIA but by FERPA.

Apparently this should give students a right to access the records, and make corrections, but records of employment records ae not covered by FERPA, but at state levels, by employment privacy laws.

Some schools try to get around the FERPA freedom of information by listing these records as law enforcement records. The same is true for companies as well.

On the Threat Assessment Team documents it mentioned a central database where information is stored, so this again is something that needs further clearification, but this is something that targets might wish to look into.

ACLU

I contacted the ACLU, but they prefer that targets take this up with the individual offices for their state. If you do try to gain access to the information from the company you believe might have your files, or some files relating to this type of targeting, and you fail to gain access then what you might wish to do is use your local office. The same is true for Canada, the U.K. and other countries. If you try to gain these records and if fails, you may wish to try the referal services, or see if there is a way to use the commissions.

http://youthviolence.edschool.virginia.edu/threat-assessment/pdf/college-threat-recommended-practices.pdf

Example Request

Let’s use the case of Randy Quaid. In 2008, Mr. Quaid had a problem with some co-workers. They filed a complaint against him. Now let’s suppose that he is a Targeted Individual and is on some kind of occupational health and safety, or Threat Assessment List because of this.


http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/02/randy_quaid_banned_from_actors_equity

All 26 members of the Lone Star Love cast brought Randy up on charges with Actors’ Equity Association, claiming he physically and verbally abused his fellow performers and that his oddball behavior onstage and off forced the show to close, thus depriving them of their jobs.

On Friday, Equity handed down its decision. According to documents obtained exclusively by The Post, the union has banned Randy for life – life! – and fined him $81,572.

So this would be a good place to start, check with Human Resources, find out what they call their Threat Assessment Team. I am not sure if this would have been his employer, or just a division that handed down the decision, not familiar with Hollywood, but I am guessing he can find a lawyer who is, and will have more of an idea what to look for, then find out if you can make requests for your information, and if not sue, till you can.

I know it’s a simplified strategy, and again I am still in the research stage for a standard procedure, but these are some suggestions.

Happy Indigo Ribbon Month

November is Indigo Ribbon Month

The Indigo Ribbon Campaign.

The world is a dangerous place,
not because of those who do evil,
but because of those who look on and do nothing.

~ Albert Einstein

The Indigo Ribbon Campaign is an awareness campaign in support of Targeted Individuals.

The Indigo Ribbon is a ray of hope for Targeted Individuals everywhere. The color represents Infinity. It’s a sign of remembrance for targets no longer here. A symbol of unity and strength for targets who remain.

The primary goal of the IRC is to bring awareness, about what is happening to Targeted Individuals and the methods being used to target, harass, and destroy them. The idea is to promote compassion and understanding about what they are experiencing and how their targeting affects the rest of society.

You can also post it on blogs, forums, websites, etc. Each campaign is independently managed and operated and yet all effort go towards promoting awareness and understanding of Targeted Individuals and their plight.

Volunteers can post on forums, send out emails, post in ezines, online news sites, blogs, podcasts, conference calls, youtube.

Who are Targeted Individuals? They are innocent individuals that are being targeted by government programs and initiatives, past and present.

Why they need help? Targets of this harassment need help in bringing about awareness that this is still happening. Not only is this targeting still happening, but it’s happening unaided and unassisted, and many targets are being destroyed by this. What is happening is that when Targets have applied to the main stream humanitarian organizations their plea’s for assistance have gone unaided.

To find out more about the Indigo Ribbon Campaign, or what you can do to help, you can follow this link. http://www.Indigoribbon.com/Quilt.

To find out more about what Targeted Individuals go through, you can visit these sites.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Media/category/stories/

Just as despair can come to one only from other human beings, hope, too, can be given to one only by other human beings.

– – Elie Weisel

Randy Quaid. Gang Stalking Target?

Randy Quaid is claiming to be a target of what he calls Hollywood Star Whackers.

He claims that other stars on on a similar type of hit list. Stars such as Britney Spears, Mel Gibson, and ofcourse Lindsay Lohan.

Randy Quaid claims that he has been followed around, and that he has been scammed out of money by lawyers and others. He claims not to be mentally ill, and that close friends such as Heath Ledgar, and David Carradine, were killed not by accident, but as part of a conspiracy.

The claims sound almost too outlandish to believe, but if you did a bit deeper into the story, a pattern starts to immerge.

I don't know about Hollywood Star Whackers, but I do believe that Mr. Quaid is in fear for his life, and he could well be in some kind of danger. He says he has been harassed for at least the last 20 years. This is what I think is going on.

I think Randy and wife Evi at some point in their past likely landed on a list. Eg. Under occupational health and safety laws, you can be placed on a monitoring list via what's called a Threat Assessment Team.

The team will contact those around you and explain why you have been flagged. Unfortunately this type of monitoring can also systemically destroy your life. This is the part that leaves many claiming conspiracy.

A lot of people are on these lists, some who should be there, many others who should not. I think what the Quaids should do is hire a lawyer, one who is familiar with privy laws, occupational health and safety laws, and mental health laws.

From what I have read the downward spiral really started after 26 of his co-workers complained of verbal and physical harassment. Claims such as this in today's society get reported, and this can get you placed on one of these lists by the threat assessment teams, and it can also serve to blacklist your life. The other sad reality is that people on these lists die, because the monitoring often crosses the line to targeting, and a conspiracy of sorts.

I don't know for sure if this is what's going on with him and his wife, but I do have a strong suspicion that this is the case. The targets of what I just described, refer to this as Gang Stalking. You can read more about threat assessment teams and Gang Stalking at this link.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/threat-assessment-teams-gang-stalking/

Follow the information about the Quiads here.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1288343965/

To learn more about this phenomenon you can visit Amazon.com

Closing The Gap
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1453803319/

Bridging The Gap
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1441448845/

I know many do not yet take the concept of Gang Stalking seriously, many others live it every day and know all too well the conspiracy does exist. Being on these lists are leading to individuals being targeted systemically. In many cases the systemic targeting ends in death, suicide, institutionalization, jail, or social poverty.

This is the time that Targeted Individuals can now make a difference. November is Indigo Ribbon Month, it is the time to raise awareness of what is happening. http://www.IndigoRibbon.com

Only by sharing our stories one by one, till they can no longer be ignored can we get this exposed. When you can name it, then you can claim it. Gang Stalking sites have been working tirelessly to expose this conspiracy, with the help of those around us, this can be exposed, and the needless suffering of innocent Targets can hopefully stop, or be curtailed.