Conspiracy Theories

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/follow-ups/

Ok so after writing the above post, I was doing some follow up's on the killing sprees that have been happening, trying to track anything as to what is behind them, agenda's etc, I found an article about one of the killing sprees that I have been tracking. "No I have absolutely no fascination with killing sprees whatsoever," but I have been tracking them, because I had a hunch they would be increasing around this time, and a need to track what is behind them.
Anyways, I just found out that the most recent one with police officers, was a member of stormfront. Apparently he posted once, but that was enough to link him to the site, see how that works?

Anyways here are my thoughts on this, I was going to do two separate posts, and I am not sure that I shouldn't. Ok looks like I am doing two separate posts.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Pittsburgh_shooter_was_fan_of_rightwing_0405.html

[quote]The Post-Gazette also mentions the website PrisonPlanet, run by radio talk show host Alex Jones, as a source for some of the stories which Poplawski found disturbing.

For example, last fall, that site ran an article, "U.S. Troops In Homeland 'Crowd Control' Patrols From October 1st," which claimed that "U.S. troops returning from duty in Iraq will be carrying out homeland patrols in America from October 1st in complete violation of Posse Comitatus for the purposes of helping with 'civil unrest and crowd control' – which could include dealing with unruly Americans after a complete economic collapse." However, the worldview which enabled Poplawski to bring those various complaints together into a single, global conspiracy theory appears to have come from far more extreme sources.

Poplawski had also posted pictures of himself at Stormfront, a white supremacist website whose slogan is "white pride worldwide." The discussion of the shootings at Stormfront, which began with speculations that the gunman would turn out to be "some non-white" or "a jew," then turned to suspicions that the recent rash of shootings is a "setup" to push through gun control legislation, has become oddly muted since the revelation that Poplawski appears to be one of theirs. [/quote]

I remember when the Montreal shooting happened and they used it to try to paint the goth community as evil and vampirefreaks as a site where these types of people regularly come from, ignoring the fact Kimveer Gill was a part of myspace was it? Anyways the goth community banned together, worked to tone down anything that would paint them in a negative light and they survived. They also had thousands of new sign up's in a matter of days, and there is no way to tell how many were informants, that are now a regular part of that community, keeping an eye and ear on it.

Anyways they survived in one sense, but they did have the spotlight pointed at them for some time.

Back to the shooting, I don't have enough details, but here are some of my thought.

Remember when those articles came out last year in the New York Times and ABC.com about Gang Stalking and I said that it looked like we would in the future get some kind of armed standoff with the police, maybe a shootout and the person would likely belong to a conspiracy site, well I think this might be it. I thought the guy arrested for uttering Obama threats might have been it, but that always seemed too light. Here is a link to my original post about that.

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/01/18/man-arrested-for-obama-threat/

See at the time I thought the Stevie threat might have been it, but that seemed too mild to get laws passed. I was expecting something either a staged, where b where a legit conspiracy theorist was put into a situation of conflict the way they bait targets. See my quote below.

[quote]We were all or should have been waiting for an incident like this to happen, something to paint some member of the conspiracy community as crazy. I was personally expecting some kind of armed stand off, [/quote]

The guy who shoot 3 police officers, belonged to what most would consider to be an extremist website, and he was a conspiracy theorist, see kill two birds with one stone. I am not saying it was staged, but I have been looking out for something coming up, and this might be it.

Here is the story tell me what you think? Is this the one that will get the laws passed that will affect conspiracy sites, and extreme websites?

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Pittsburgh_shooter_was_fan_of_rightwing_0405.html

[quote]The unemployed twenty-two year old man who killed three Pittsburgh police officers and wounded two others in a four-hour shootout on Saturday morning had been heavily influenced by extremist conspiracy theories prior to the incident. [/quote]

This is the sort of thing that can paint conspiracy sites as extreme dangerous, mind you that conspiracy theories have been around for year, from aliens and secret government cover up's etc, but these conspiracy sites such as ATS and others might be painted in a new light. Anything that paints the government in an unflattering light would be prime targets.

I am not surprised by this, but what I would be watching for, and others should be watching for are laws, what will be the fallout, this should be a priority for conspiracy sites, and extremist sites.

Again please remember that the articles last year did everything in their power to paint Gang Stalking sites as either extreme communities or conspiracy websites, both labels were wrong, but what does truth matter when an agenda is at stake? Now we come full circle, and we have someone from an extremist website, who believed in conspiracies, let's the witch hunts begin. Oh
wait they already have.

The side you don't see 2.

The side you don't see part two.

There were two more incidents that should have been added to part one.

The first thing I have now observed, is that on several occasions where the Citizen Informants on the train, don't quite know if they have the right target in sight. Meaning they have another person that fit's the description.

What will happen is, I have sat there, and personally observed, them using my specific sensitivity to try to annoy the other person. So for example, if my sensitivity was Jingle keys, they would be jingling keys at the wrong person. I believe the theory is, that if they have the wrong person, that person will not react, but that has not always been the case.

I have personally witnessed the Citizen Informants, using the sensitivity to such a degree that they have annoyed the wrong person, or someone who was not me, by using the same sensitivity that I use to have. I have seen this happen more than once. So what I am wondering, is how often do these incidents get reported back, under my file?

This brings me to the second incident. I was at work, and this was during the time I was just starting to realise there was something really wrong, and that people were doing this out in public deliberately.

Well apparently an incident happened. I was getting the blame for it. People at work that I knew, were walking past me giving me dirty looks, saying thing like "some people are so rude," "would you want that getting said to you?"

I knew enough to know an incident had happened, but I didn't know the details, and knew that I was getting the blame and disdain for it. A few days later, apparently the correction was made, and people all started to act all fake nice again. The thought that crossed my mind then, and still does is how many other times have incidents happened, and I had them ascribed to me?

Remember these people are looking for a description, and if they find someone who fits, eg. Asian, male, 5' tall, they will go after that person, wither they are the true target or not, etc.

The last thing that I have observed on several occasions is that they will have people that appear to be crazy or on a couple of occasions it's been Citizen Informants doing a skit and pretending to be crazy. I say snitches pretending to be crazy, because I have observed them, quite clearly and coherently doing the one handed sign language to the other Citizen Informants.

They will appear at the same spot where I am located. It's in my opinion that they appear to be deliberately trying to have someone pretend to be crazy or someone who is crazy, I suspect it's the first where I am located at the time, talking to themselves or doing other really crazy stuff.

Think about it, I am being tracked around the city. So someone calls in a crazy person at Crazy Ave and Insane St talking to themselves or acting crazy in some other way and all of a sudden, the incident is attributed to the target who was in that spot, even though it was not the target.

I do not know how many incidents I have attributed to me, that have nothing to do with me? I do know that I will probably never get to see a file on me, and have a chance to clear my name. What I do know is this system has done some very deliberate things to try to make me, and others look crazy or unstable.

These are things targets should be mindful of, when out in public. I didn't at the time, but if you suddenly see another person, who seems to be acting crazy, or more than likely just pretending to be so, write down the date and the time, because this could be attributed to you in future.