The Next Distraction

Bored Now.

Wake me up when the fake pandemic is over with. Oh wait it looks like it might be time. Yeah,
I call it a fake pandemic because I knew the media was really pushing this, but I did not know by how much till I came across these articles.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1240601754

http://www.theblogofrecord.com/tag/annual-flu-death-toll-per-year/

http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us_flu-related_deaths.htm

[quote]Questions and Answers Regarding Estimating Deaths from Influenza in the United States
How many people die from flu each year in the United States?

The number of influenza-associated (i.e., flu-related) deaths varies from year to year because flu seasons often fluctuate in length and severity. CDC estimated that about 36,000 people died of flu-related causes each year, on average, during the 1990s in the United States. This figure includes people dying from complications of flu. This estimate came from a 2003 study published in the Journal of the American Medication Association (JAMA), which looked at the 1990-91 through the 1998-99 flu seasons [10]. Statistical modeling was used to estimate how many flu-related deaths occurred among people whose underlying cause of death on their death certificate was listed as a respiratory or circulatory disease. During these years, the number of estimated deaths ranged from 17,000 to 52,000.

In 2009, CDC published additional estimates of flu-related deaths comparing different methods, including the methods used in the 2003 JAMA study. The seasons studied included the 1993-94 through the 2002-03 flu seasons [9]. Results from this study showed that during this time period, 36,171 flu-related deaths occurred per year, on average.

How did CDC estimate that an average of 36,000 people die in the U.S. each year from flu?
This statistic came from a 2003 JAMA study by CDC scientists [10]. The study used statistical modeling to estimate that during 9 influenza seasons from 1990-91 through 1998-99, an annual average of 36,000 flu-related deaths occurred among people whose underlying cause of death on their death certificate was listed as a respiratory or circulatory disease. A 2009 study that appeared in the journal Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses made a similar estimate for the 10 influenza seasons from 1993 to 2003 [9].
[/quote]

That is 3000 people per month that die of the regular influenza, but here we were getting death con 5 warnings from the CDC or WHO because I think 1 person died in the States? Don't get me wrong, every death matters, but it was a forced scenario and I kept wondering why? Was it just to see how people would react? To distract them from something else? To test the waters for the next big plague? They have spent the last two years trying to whip everyone into a frenzy about Avian Flu. Getting us mentally prepared that a global plague is inevitable. (Only if you make it so.)

They have their vials of Tamil flu ready and waiting, for them to make money, and to what make the public better? Many people question taking flu shots and there is good reason to, but that's another thread.

Does anyone else wonder what the real purpose of this distraction was? I mean people have been predicting it for some time. I have a much over due blog post about it, but it seems like they are going over board with the distractions.

Let's look at the year in review.

First we had the economic collapse. Remember the daily headlines? Economy expected to get worst, could be years before recovery, bleak times ahead, blah, blah, blah. That didn't exactly work. It worked for a time, but I don't think people are in the mood for another great depression.

They recently tried the low flying planes over New York to scare people into submission. It upset people more than scared them, so the Osama fake terror Bin Laden Bogeyman is not working like it use to, but they do keep trying.

Then we had plague the next distraction, and that also does not seem to have worked. I think people are just tired of it. I know I am.

Oh also is anyone else wondering how Swine Flu, Avian Flu, Human Influenza, came together, and the combination came from 2 different continents?

http://joerobertson.com/liberty/why-call-it-swine-flu-when-it-is-human-avian-swine-flu

[quote]EVERY Media source is leading with “Swine Flu” or “Swine Influenza”… Why? Or Why should anyone care?

Well, if you dig a little bit, you will find that the influenza outbreak in Mexico City and the US are a mutation of FOUR Viruses form THREE Continents… AND…

Creates a very “novel” strain that is not SWINE FLU… it is HUMAN-Avian-Swine-Flu!
It Is The Feared BIRD FLU Mutated to HUMANS and is being passed Human to Human… that is WHY it should not be dismissed as “JUST” another Swine Flu… because it is not!

And more IMPORTANT is Where and How did this thing Evolve and End Up in Mexico City? See my posts on the Baxter Cover-up that involves the World Health Organization…
The Avian Swine Flu Strain Created in the Lab[/quote]

http://www.thecitizen.com/~citizen0/node/36488

[quote]No Surprise: Flu Virus a Mixture of Swine, Human, and Avian Virus TypesWhen what is now called a “swine flu” was first reported last week to be infecting, and killing some people in Mexico, health officials noted it was a strain of flu never before seen. In fact, it is technically incorrect to call this simply a “swine” flu. Analyses showed it’s a mixture of swine, human and avian viruses, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Also, it is genetically different from the fully human H1N1 seasonal influenza virus that has been circulating globally for the past few years. After a review of the evidence, there is one conclusion: the new flu virus contains DNA from avian, swine viruses (including elements from European and Asian viruses) and human viruses.

So did this curious mixture just develop naturally, out of the blue? Is it the result of inhumane farming practices, as the Humane Society of the United States (http://www.hsus.org/) has suggested, that exposes immune-compromised pigs to all sorts of animal and human feces?

Well, maybe. But let’s go back and look at the facts to see if any other scenario could be possible.
First of all, there’s the troublesome detail that the virus has elements that come from multiple continents. Then there’s the fact that true swine flu is only rarely transmissible to humans — this flu is spreading human-to-human, most likely because it contains DNA from human flu.
Could someone have deliberately mixed these viruses together? Is that possible? Absolutely.[/quote]

http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/02/27/8560781.html

[quote]

Baxter: Product contained live bird flu virus

People familiar with biosecurity rules are dismayed by evidence that human H3N2 and avian H5N1 viruses somehow co-mingled in the Orth-Donau facility. That is a dangerous practice that should not be allowed to happen, a number of experts insisted.

Accidental release of a mixture of live H5N1 and H3N2 viruses could have resulted in dire consequences. While H5N1 doesn’t easily infect people, H3N2 viruses do. If someone exposed to a mixture of the two had been simultaneously infected with both strains, he or she could have served as an incubator for a hybrid virus able to transmit easily to and among people.

That mixing process, called reassortment, is one of two ways pandemic viruses are created. There is no suggestion that happened because of this accident, however. “We have no evidence of any reassortment, that any reassortment may have occurred,” said Andraghetti. “And we have no evidence of any increased transmissibility of the viruses that were involved in the experiment with the ferrets in the Czech Republic.” [/quote]

Wow live virus samples in that could have incubated and could have become a pandemic virus.

So what's next? Project Blue Beam? Holograms across the globe? Are we going to get a taste of their UFO's? Secret government air craft that they have been keeping a secret just like the stealth boomers?

Who knows what the next distraction will be. What will they use to keep control of the sheep?
What will they do to scare them?

Much like a soap opera, I am starting to loose interest. Thanks to your programing people to have become so attention deficient that they have the attention spans of three year olds, most people have probably also lost interest as well.

Well till it's time for the next distraction.

"And in case I don't see ya.... good afternoon, good evening, and goodnight." The Truman Show.

Conspiracy Theories

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/follow-ups/

Ok so after writing the above post, I was doing some follow up's on the killing sprees that have been happening, trying to track anything as to what is behind them, agenda's etc, I found an article about one of the killing sprees that I have been tracking. "No I have absolutely no fascination with killing sprees whatsoever," but I have been tracking them, because I had a hunch they would be increasing around this time, and a need to track what is behind them.
Anyways, I just found out that the most recent one with police officers, was a member of stormfront. Apparently he posted once, but that was enough to link him to the site, see how that works?

Anyways here are my thoughts on this, I was going to do two separate posts, and I am not sure that I shouldn't. Ok looks like I am doing two separate posts.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Pittsburgh_shooter_was_fan_of_rightwing_0405.html

[quote]The Post-Gazette also mentions the website PrisonPlanet, run by radio talk show host Alex Jones, as a source for some of the stories which Poplawski found disturbing.

For example, last fall, that site ran an article, "U.S. Troops In Homeland 'Crowd Control' Patrols From October 1st," which claimed that "U.S. troops returning from duty in Iraq will be carrying out homeland patrols in America from October 1st in complete violation of Posse Comitatus for the purposes of helping with 'civil unrest and crowd control' – which could include dealing with unruly Americans after a complete economic collapse." However, the worldview which enabled Poplawski to bring those various complaints together into a single, global conspiracy theory appears to have come from far more extreme sources.

Poplawski had also posted pictures of himself at Stormfront, a white supremacist website whose slogan is "white pride worldwide." The discussion of the shootings at Stormfront, which began with speculations that the gunman would turn out to be "some non-white" or "a jew," then turned to suspicions that the recent rash of shootings is a "setup" to push through gun control legislation, has become oddly muted since the revelation that Poplawski appears to be one of theirs. [/quote]

I remember when the Montreal shooting happened and they used it to try to paint the goth community as evil and vampirefreaks as a site where these types of people regularly come from, ignoring the fact Kimveer Gill was a part of myspace was it? Anyways the goth community banned together, worked to tone down anything that would paint them in a negative light and they survived. They also had thousands of new sign up's in a matter of days, and there is no way to tell how many were informants, that are now a regular part of that community, keeping an eye and ear on it.

Anyways they survived in one sense, but they did have the spotlight pointed at them for some time.

Back to the shooting, I don't have enough details, but here are some of my thought.

Remember when those articles came out last year in the New York Times and ABC.com about Gang Stalking and I said that it looked like we would in the future get some kind of armed standoff with the police, maybe a shootout and the person would likely belong to a conspiracy site, well I think this might be it. I thought the guy arrested for uttering Obama threats might have been it, but that always seemed too light. Here is a link to my original post about that.

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/01/18/man-arrested-for-obama-threat/

See at the time I thought the Stevie threat might have been it, but that seemed too mild to get laws passed. I was expecting something either a staged, where b where a legit conspiracy theorist was put into a situation of conflict the way they bait targets. See my quote below.

[quote]We were all or should have been waiting for an incident like this to happen, something to paint some member of the conspiracy community as crazy. I was personally expecting some kind of armed stand off, [/quote]

The guy who shoot 3 police officers, belonged to what most would consider to be an extremist website, and he was a conspiracy theorist, see kill two birds with one stone. I am not saying it was staged, but I have been looking out for something coming up, and this might be it.

Here is the story tell me what you think? Is this the one that will get the laws passed that will affect conspiracy sites, and extreme websites?

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Pittsburgh_shooter_was_fan_of_rightwing_0405.html

[quote]The unemployed twenty-two year old man who killed three Pittsburgh police officers and wounded two others in a four-hour shootout on Saturday morning had been heavily influenced by extremist conspiracy theories prior to the incident. [/quote]

This is the sort of thing that can paint conspiracy sites as extreme dangerous, mind you that conspiracy theories have been around for year, from aliens and secret government cover up's etc, but these conspiracy sites such as ATS and others might be painted in a new light. Anything that paints the government in an unflattering light would be prime targets.

I am not surprised by this, but what I would be watching for, and others should be watching for are laws, what will be the fallout, this should be a priority for conspiracy sites, and extremist sites.

Again please remember that the articles last year did everything in their power to paint Gang Stalking sites as either extreme communities or conspiracy websites, both labels were wrong, but what does truth matter when an agenda is at stake? Now we come full circle, and we have someone from an extremist website, who believed in conspiracies, let's the witch hunts begin. Oh
wait they already have.

Man arrested for Obama threat

http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_2454736,00.html

It's finally happened. We have someone linked to conspiracy websites, that did something crazy. You knew it was coming ever since the What's behind the conspiracy empire articles.
I am serious just glad that there was no blood shed involved, or lone gunman theory type thing.
Let's look critically at this however. Some guy named Stevie something or other, allegedly wrote that he wanted to kill Obama.

So we can assume that he is maybe crazy? Ok, that a possibility, but since being a part of these conspiracy websites, is suppose to mean critical thinking, remember what that was and thinking outside the box, let's look at some other theories.

I am going to say that I visit the odd conspiracy website and in the years that I have visited
those sites, I have never heard anyone threaten to kill George W. Bush, and he was not a well liked president on some of these websites, but people were always like let's impeach him, or file charges, I can't think of any who threatened violence against him.

If Stevie what's his name is not a complete whack-job, then could he be a government shrill, or some type of military person who was set up to do this, and could this be what the conspiracy sites have been waiting for?

Eg. On one of the main conspiracy websites, right after this happened, I saw a thread that said that they thought he was a whackjob because he believed in some type of inverted sky theory. There you have it, because you believe in weird theories you are a dangerous whack job. Watch out David Icke. They also again tried to say that sites like that draw the mentally ill, which is the same argument they tried after the what's behind the conspiracy empires article came out. Now instead of critical arguments people are just silent, which is not a good thing.

They also distanced themselves from him, which is normal, but they asked no critical questions. There was no thinking outside of the box.

This guy had no gun, and no way of getting to the president, so why did he make the threats, was he put up to it?

When I saw his pictures I thought either of someone who was former navy seals, (military like Jessie the body) or you know one of those people that's not too bright and could be put up to something?

Then he was also really playing up for the cameras is the other thing that I noticed right away. Even when he was being arrested, he just kept rambling trying to give the impression that he was unstable, which might have been the deliberate idea.

If the conspiracy sites don't critically investigate this incident like they do the school shootings, then they are not doing their due diligence.

I know conspiracy theory right? Not really I draw your attention to the protest movements and what these people try to do there to give them a bad reputation. Watch this video and you will see not one, but three cops, try to incite a riot. They get stopped and fake arrested by their own, but had they succeeded, they would have ruined the reputation of that specific protest.

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=gAfzUOx53Rg

These people are on these conspiracy websites, and if they are not sprouting off garbage of their own, then they are trying to encourage others to do so, so you have to watch out. What sounds like an innocent discussion today, could be used to paint you as crazy tomorrow.

The other thing about this guy, which is hear say at this moment, but I will blog it anyways is that he allegedly harassed the former owner of Godlike Productions, till the owner thought of selling the site. If this is true, then he could be a shrill who set out to do this, so one of theirs could take over. (I am not saying this happened, cause I still have to confirm this story, but let's start thinking critically.)

We were all or should have been waiting for an incident like this to happen, something to paint some member of the conspiracy community as crazy. I was personally expecting some kind of armed stand off, but this is worst ofcourse, cause everyone is Obama crazy, and they could use
this to enact laws against these sites, so keep that in mind.