Closing The Gap

Closing The Gap takes a deeper look into the Gang Stalking phenomenon and how community notification programs are being used and abused to destroy the lives of innocent citizens.

These programs are being used to create a system of state control and conformity. The citizens of democratic countries have been mobilized as weapons for the state. They are being used as a clearing house for those who the state see as unfit, and undesirable. The state in every community, workplace, and most families have created a disturbing, interconnected system of surveillance, and control. Once targeted, the person in question is blacklisted.

Then those around the target are categorically enlisted into the states monitoring, supervision, and annexing of the target.

Jiverly Wong, letter from a TI perspective.

This is a recreation of the Jiverly Wong letter. A translation to slightly better english, but also a translation from a Targeted Individual perspective. I hope this helps you understand what the letter might have been trying to say.

To recreate the letter Jivery Wong wrote.

[quote]The first I want to say sorry I know a little English. I hope you understand all of this. Of course you need to know why I shooting? Because undercover cop gave me a lot of ass during eighteen years I got seven years and eight month delivery to grocery in the California came back New York on the August 2007. [/quote]

When he writes that the undercover cop gave him a lot of ass, he most likely is describing his harassment by the police for the last 18 years.
He sounds like he worked for seven years and eight months as a grocery deliver person in Calafornia and then moved back to New York.


[quote]Let talk about when I live in California. Such as...cop used 24 hours the technique of ultramodern and camera for burn the chemical in my house. For switch the channel time...For adjust the fan. For made me unbreathable. For made me vomit. For connect the music into my ear. [/quote]

He says let's talk about when I lived in California. The cop used 24 modern surviellence techniques on him. The camera would be surveillance. He says to burn chemicals in his home. Most likely the chemical could be gassing, which is a common tactic. They switch the channel time, adjusted his fan, this is common. They use remote devices to control the electronics of targeted individuals. Such as VCR, Fridge, Etc. The reference to vomit, sounds consistant with gassing. The music to his ear could either a be messing with music equipment, or it could be a reference to Voice to skull, also known as V2K, a remote process that would allow a target to hear sounds or music, and not know where it was coming from.

[quote]Undercover cop usual coined some nasty was not true about me and spread a rumour to the receiver and some people know me conduce toward many people predudiced and selfish to me...cop made me lost my job...cop put me became poor. [/quote]

So the undercover cops spread nasty rumours that were not true, to the reciever being people who believed the rumors, and then some people, even the ones who knew him acted prejudice and selfish towards him. He says they caused him to lose his job, and made him poor. (This is common stuff that happens to targets, to the average public this will just look like the ravings of a crazy man.)

[quote]Let talk about when I live at the 28 Baker St. 2nd Floor, Johnson City, New York 13790. It terrible when I live there such as...cop wait until midnight when I off the light and went to the bed. Cop unlock my door and came in take a sit in my room ((cop did it thirteen time on the year 1994 )) on the thirteen time had three time touch me when I sleeping. One time stolen 20 dollar in my wallet. One time used electric gun shoot at the behind my neck. (That time I did not know English) [/quote]

He then goes on to talk about the harassment that happened when he lived in New York, which followed him from California. He says the cops waited till midnight when he turned off the lights and went to bed. The cops unlocked his door and came to sit in his room, this was done to him thirteen times. (As strange as this sounds, other targets report the same things, including Ramona Lopez who woke up during a sexual assult.) He says this happened to him in 1994. And he says they touched him 3 times when he was sleeping. Once they stole 20 dollars from him. Once they used an electric gun to shoot his neck. I don't know if he means a taser, or stun gun or something else here.


Please continue second page thank you.
Page 2

[quote]From 1990 to 1995 New York undercover cop try to get a car accident with me. Such as when I driving on the highway and on the street undercover cop sunddenly brake the car stop immediately at the of front my car...cop did it 32 time like that during 1990 to 1995 but I never hit the car. [/quote]

So he says from 1990 to 1995 in New York the cops tried to get him into car accidents, again standard for targets of this harassment, some die as a result of this stuff. He says that when driving on the highway or and on the street they would suddenly break in front of his car, this he says happened 32 times (notice he says time and not times, I think he does not include plurals at times, but this is what is understood.) He says he never once hit the any of the cars in that time from 1990 to 1995.


[quote]Many time from 1990 to 1997 at the day time...cop exploit unknow English and went to my house knock the door for harass and domineer. Of course during that time cop coined something was not true about me and spread a rumour nasty like the California cop. [/quote]

From 1990 to 1997 during the day, the cop took advantage of the fact that he did not know english and when to his house to harass him and I believe he means domineer him. Again during that time the cop coined or spread nasty rumours that were not true, just like the cops in California did.

[quote]From August 2007 until now cop gave me not to much ass only one time cop leave a massage in my voice mail and said (( come back your country )) after five minute I send a text massage to them I said I will call the police and they send it back to me they said they are the police. [/quote]

From August 2007 till now, I assume he means 2009, the cops gave him much hassel, (he says ass, but I believe he means hassel) He goes on to say one time a cop left a voice mail message on his machine saying go back to your country, (racial harassment) after 5 minutes he says h text messaged them back (note he says them, that's why I believe the harassment was more then one person, but his english is bad and he does not use the plurals), he threatened to call the police, and they sent back a text saying that they are the police. (This happened in 2007, I wonder if we could get those records?)

[quote]Dear New Ten Now. Right now I still get unemploment benefit of the company Shop Vac Endicott. New York State Department of Labor was cheat and unpaid from December 1st 2008 to December 28th 2008 I already claim weekly benefit from that date. [/quote]

Dear now ten is the news station. He ways that he was getting unemployment benifts from Shop Van Endicott, he says that New York State Department of Labor was cheating him, and it sounds like he was not paid his benifits form December 2001 to December 2008.

[quote]Any way I can not accepted my poor life. Before I cut my poor life I must oneself get a judge job for make an impartial with undercover cop by at least two people with me go to return to the dust of earth. [/quote]

He says that he can no longer accept his poor life. He says before he takes his life, he will play judge, (I am not sure what he is saying about the cop,) but then he also says he will take at least two people with him, when he returns to the dust.

[quote]Already impartial now..cop bring about this shooting. cop must responsible. And you have a nice day. [/quote]

He blames the shooting on the cops, and being driven to it by the cops. He says the cops brought about this shooting, the cops must be responsible. Then he says have a nice day.
I am sure there will be many interpretations of his letter, but this is what I came away with after going over the letter.

Quote:Dear New Ten Now. Right now I still get unemploment benefit of the company Shop Vac Endicott. New York State Department of Labor was cheat and unpaid from December 1st 2008 to December 28th 2008 I already claim weekly benefit from that date. Dear now ten is the news station.

He ways that he was getting unemployment benifts from Shop Van Endicott, he says that New York State Department of Labor was cheating him, and it sounds like he was not paid his benifits form December 2001 to December 2008.

Quote:Any way I can not accepted my poor life. Before I cut my poor life I must oneself get a judge job for make an impartial with undercover cop by at least two people with me go to return to the dust of earth.

He says that he can no longer accept his poor life. He says before he takes his life, he will play judge, (I am not sure what he is saying about the cop,) but then he also says he will take at least two people with him, when he returns to the dust.

Quote:Already impartial now..cop bring about this shooting. cop must responsible. And you have a nice day.

He blames the shooting on the cops, and being driven to it by the cops. He says the cops brought about this shooting, the cops must be responsible. Then he says have a nice day. I am sure there will be many interpretations of his letter, but this is what I came away with after going over the letter.

Deconstructing David Lawson

http://terroriststalking.wordpress.com/

I have wanted to make this post for some time now. As many people in the Targeted Individual community may know, for several years, since 9/11 there has been a book that many targets have been referencing called Terrorist Stalking In America. The book first claimed that the stalking or harassment was being done by extremist groups.

Then just as quickly as David Lawson wrote the book, he seemed to go missing again. We were assured by some community leader that he was too busy and could not be interviewed, but a lot of things never made sense. When I started to do my own investigation into what was behind Gang Stalking, I started to learn ask even more questions.

If they were extremists how did he get out? He claims to have been in these stalking groups for several years, that he was one of them, that they are dangerous, and use intimidation methods to keep their members in line.

Anyways I recently came across a posting at who is a rat and I thought it would be nice to review the posting and go over it with my own interpretation. I don't know how many targets read this book, and went to the authorities talking about terrorist only to be institutionalised, or called the phone company to say that extremists were driving cable cars, or toss pop on cops, but I hope this interpretation will help future targets.

Anyways if you follow this link, you can read up on deconstructing David Lawson.
http://terroriststalking.wordpress.com/

Gang Stalking

The term Gang Stalking. A few years ago when I came online I learnt about Harassment, Mobbing, and then Gang Stalking.

Two years ago when I first learnt about this stuff there was one website that was doing a lot to help and had some useful information.

The other terms for Gang Stalking at the time were also not very popular in the search engines. Vengeance Stalking, Organised Stalking, Cause Stalking, etc. There were all names that were not fitting and at the time google and other engines were giving the term Gang Stalking the most publicity. I also like the professional looking nature of one of the more useful sites online.

One of the things I did before starting my own Gang Stalking site was to network with other sites in the community. Not in the Gang Stalking community, but in the outer world, the place where we have to bring the gap.

Because of my work on getting things like Harassment and Bullying exposed, I had made friends with several other sites and asked if they would be kind enough to link to that specific Gang Stalking site. The friends from many of the other stalking sites did not identify with Gang Stalking at the time, which is understandable. Remember in the harsh client of a couple of years ago, just to mention of any term associated with Gang Stalking would get threads shut down, or attacks of you are crazy, etc. This has changed with hard work.

The members of the mobbing sites which I contacted, I think there were about 3 really good mobbing sites at the time that I was in touch with. Two of those sites readily identified with Gang Stalking and were kind enough to add the link to the gang stalking site, which I was still referencing to a couple of years ago.

Shortly after this I realised that things were going very slowly and that many of the sites seemed to be be doing the opposite of being helpful. At that time I was still on the forums, and you can really learn a lot of those, but there is a price at times to be paid.

One discussion that came up was should the name of the cause be changed or should a gradual shift be made to use something else. Since Gang Stalking might be confusing for some people. At the time I was still open to the idea and working with others to see if we could advance this as quickly as possible.

Any articles that came out about the subject matter at the time had gone under the term Gang Stalking. That includes the Lynn stuter article, Sharon Weinberger and a few others. Some were good articles others were not, but that was the spoken or unspoken agreed to term.

At the discussion which I was a part of I suggested if a name change should occur, community mobbing should be considered, because people were at the time finally starting to understand the concept of mobbing, how it worked, how it affected the targets, and many in that community had also committed suicide, or workplace shootings. As you will see in later research there is a reason for this strong correlation.

Anyways I asked the person who was running a popular forum at the time this question. How does a name change occur? I mean who get's to decide if a movements name should get changed? Especially when we are a pretty disjointed movement. Just like tomorrow if we were calling each other Targeted Individuals and someone decided to change this, who get's to decide?

At the time there were several Gang Stalking sites, some hard to find, others impossible to find.

The person who is in my opinion looked upon as a community leader, said no one really decides this, we just discuss this and then start using the term and then take it from there. Really who get's to decide since many of those sites are not part of the forum? Ah I guess only the members of that discussion and everyone else get's left out.

I at this time decided that I really didn't think this was a helpful course and decided to leave the term Gang Stalking as is. Those a rose by any other name would still smell as sweet, if Roses are known as Roses today and we start calling them stink weed tomorrow, it will be an adjustment for the public. Eg. Let's try changing the name of Electronic harassment to shock wave syndrome, you basically almost have to begin from scratch and it wastes precious time in getting people readjusted to new terms and it does not move things forward, especially for activism online or offline.

The community really just needed education about what was happening. If proper content was used, in my two years online, people do understand the terms, and again with Gang Stalking citizen informants on forums fell into two, many three categories. The ones who automatically tried to discredit the thread as paranoid or crazy, and the ones who even after reading a thread still when, well I hate Gang's anyways. Most of the general public that I tried to introduce information to, are quit capable of reviewing the information and understanding it. It's the same as Cointelpro or any other name.

I really do not think the people who invented the term expected Gang Stalking to catch on so quickly, or for the truth of the fact that this was being done by the government to get out. Remember these same persons that I spoke of in this article, till not too long ago, still had people chasing vigilante gangs, and I think many of us still would have been chasing those phantoms if we had not branched out on our own and started our own research.

So where does that leave everything? Where it's always been. You have a movement that often have Citizen Informants or agents from what I have been told controlling some most aspects of the community. They have the share numeric capacity to control each other, and to control what get's said, what get's disseminated. Which terms become changes or moved around.

If they choose to go in a direction that is not helpful, you have to then stay on course. Remember for every step forward, they try to make sure it's two steps back.

Most people that are new, will not understand or grasp this concept at first, or really will never grap it.
So the preferred term for me and for what is happening to me, and still for many others is Gang Stalking, if I ever leave off using this term. My second preferred term would clearly be community mobbing. Which two years ago was very helpful in getting others to understand what was happening to us, because they understood the term mobbing.