Normalized. A Gang Stalking update

Normalized

Several years I came online to look up information about my workplace harassment, only to discover that my workplace situation was something called workplace mobbing.

After finding out about the workplace mobbing, I found out that my situation was something worst, it was really something called Gang Stalking.

After staying on some of the support groups for some time, I realised that the groups were run by the other side, and I left. However one of the things that had been discussed was getting Gang Stalking normalized in society.

How to get Gang Stalking normalized? The groups had talked about contacting helpful organizations, sending out pamphlets, etc. All the usual routes, but unlike mobbing, or bullying, most people did not want to discuss the topic. Remember this was the day of forum accounts getting banned, for starting a thread on the topic, legit threads being closed. So how do you get a topic normalized that is in essence taboo?

One of the first things I did was to start to use resources, like the urban dictionary. See there are two ways that things can get done. The traditional way, go to organizations, hand out pamphlets, etc, or the other way. Start using it online, use it in the slang way, until the term get's popular. If anyone has studied modern society, they realize, that things tend to work in a reverse pyramid type of way. They trickle down to up. The slang of today, are the normalized everyday words of tomorrow. So when the traditional route did not work, my strategy was the other.

So four or five years later here we are. The term has made it's way into our cultural dialect. The news stories in the paper use the term, and they use it correctly. The parodies that the community have had done in regards to Gang Stalking also use the term correctly. By going the less traditional route, the term has come a long way.



Along the way the Indigo Ribbon campaign was added. A symbol that Targeted Individuals could use to identify and support our cause along the way. November is Indigo Ribbon month, so don't forget to wear your Indigo Ribbon buttons.



Along the way, I have had to personally fight to keep the term alive. There was a campaign to remove the term some years ago, a campaign which failed. A campaign which would have seen the movement start from scratch. In taking a stance, the Gang Stalking World website has been targeted by some, placed on their hit lists, or rather credibility lists, but it's been worth it.

Along the line, the vigilante myth has been explored many times, and outed. The vigilante myth that still keeps going even though the truth is out there. Recently I had the chance to do some more investigation on David Lawson, I found out some interesting details, but I won't post most of it here, for now. But needless to say, it's a network system, and the other side tends to control most of what the public believes or what information is disseminated, despite all the good information that is out there.

I am also not sure how many are familiar with Mr. Lawson's first book on satalight piracy. It's been pointed out several times, that the government back in the 90's set up website to catch satalight thieves. Mr. Lawson just happened to have such a site, from whence that book and several others on the topic were sold, along with his terrorist stalking book ofcourse.



The truth of this has been exposed time and time again by, but as long as the other side keeps selling the vigilante myth, that's what the people keep swallowing. Feel free to search the blog, it's been discussed many times.

http://terroriststalking.wordpress.com/

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/12/03/gang-stalking-myths-and-disinformation/

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2008/12/03/deconstructing-david-lawson/

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/gang-stalking-reloaded/

Remember there is one specific person who has helped keep this myth alive. While denouncing legit websites, this person who claims to have meet David Lawson, or spoken to him, continually supported, and touted his book, without ever requesting proof, that what he was saying was the truth. This same person however had a very different criteria for websites who pointed out government involvement. A different criteria that is for some websites that pointed out the government was involved, other sites saying the same thing, were oddly enough left alone.

Either way, today some progress is being made. Years ago, the Lawson book is all we had, then the Naylor book. Today there are several books about this topic, and targets have a lot more variety and choice.



As an individual who had to take on the role of activist, I am deeply happy with where things are today. I can look back and see the road that has been travelled, and the progress that has been made.

Internally I am in a really good place, and am happier than I have been in a really long time. The scary thing about this system is that they want to paint targets as depressed, suicidal, unhappy. Many targets might not socialize the way they use to, or hang out the way they once did, but that does not make them happy. I can only speak for myself, but anytime spent away from the creatures that are involved in the destruction of innocent lives, is time well spent. I put a lot of effort into my activism, and it's paid off. I am many things but unhappy is not one of them.

Financially, sure my activism has not made me rich. The full time job that this has become is as mentioned before more of a volunteer position than anything else. Rich in spirit, and not in much else right now, but I am really happy, and in a good place.

See as a target you see so much up and down, each new crew that they get interpret things the way they would act. I had a conversation recently about how unhappy I should be about neural monitoring, and the other person was expressing how depressed they would be, but I pointed out that I would view that as an opportunity. If someone was remotely neural monitoring me, I would use the opportunity 24/7 to let them know what I thought of them, and their system. For me I have learnt to not even let the thought of such faze me. I have learnt through this to have a really upbeat attitude most of the time. Sure there are the odd days that are worst than some, but I like who I am becoming on the inside. If nothing else this targeting builds character, and I have gained plenty in droves. If I didn't have character before, I sure have plenty now, and I really like who I am.

Finances, I think about them, but I don't worry. The amazing thing is that overnight you can lose a fortune, but you can also become one of the wealthiest persons on the planet. Several years ago, J.K. Rowlings was literally on the dole in the U.K. she could not support herself, and then she started writing, today not only is she the author of one of the most popular book series ever written, but she is one of the wealthiest women in the U.K.

So these informant tend to project a lot, oh the target must be depressed, yes if you were in my situation you would be depressed, but thank God, you are not me, and I do not think, function, or do anything like you. Stop projecting your ineptness on me. Unlike you, I have been there done that. These people have messed with my life so much over the years, I just don't care. I have been tortured, fried, shaken, burnt, had their radar guns, laser guns, you name it used on me, over the years, and I am still standing. So really where most of them would have cracked by now, I am sure, I am not them, and each day that goes by, I am eternally grateful for that.

So there are some improvements. Nothing in life is perfect, but I like where some things are going, and I look forward to activism in future, and yes writing the next Harry Potter type series would not hurt either, but hope does spring eternal and that is what counts. My sense of humour is well intact despite all this, and I do hope, even thought things at times do look dark at times, I do hope.

(1 And he spake a parable unto them to this end, that men ought always to pray, and not to faint;. Luke; 18:1)

David Lawson Redux? New Gang Stalking Article

http://www.kens5.com/news/Stalked-drugged-and-raped-Is-it-happening-in-San-Antonio.html

New article on Gang Stalking.

It has a nice sensational headline. I think there are many good points in this article, but the end of the article seems like another article designed to shift he blame away from the government. They like to do that.

[quote]
Dr. Hall’s belief is that we all face some sort of terrorism in our lives that is mostly unseen and deadly. He contends criminals are tapping into our government’s surveillance systems to gain access to our lives and minds.
[/quote]

Maybe he just prefers to believe that. Though I seriously hope that he is not pulling a David Lawson, I think that to honestly look into this topic and not finger the government is pretty dishonest, naive, or just blind. However that is just my opinion.

At least an article is out, and if it starts some discussions great.

At least he didn't blame it on vigilante gangs, just "criminals tapping into the government's surveillance systems." Right. It's called the government giving power to the snitches, I mean citizen informants, that they should not have. Still it's an article, so have a read.

Deconstructing David Lawson

http://terroriststalking.wordpress.com/

I have wanted to make this post for some time now. As many people in the Targeted Individual community may know, for several years, since 9/11 there has been a book that many targets have been referencing called Terrorist Stalking In America. The book first claimed that the stalking or harassment was being done by extremist groups.

Then just as quickly as David Lawson wrote the book, he seemed to go missing again. We were assured by some community leader that he was too busy and could not be interviewed, but a lot of things never made sense. When I started to do my own investigation into what was behind Gang Stalking, I started to learn ask even more questions.

If they were extremists how did he get out? He claims to have been in these stalking groups for several years, that he was one of them, that they are dangerous, and use intimidation methods to keep their members in line.

Anyways I recently came across a posting at who is a rat and I thought it would be nice to review the posting and go over it with my own interpretation. I don't know how many targets read this book, and went to the authorities talking about terrorist only to be institutionalised, or called the phone company to say that extremists were driving cable cars, or toss pop on cops, but I hope this interpretation will help future targets.

Anyways if you follow this link, you can read up on deconstructing David Lawson.
http://terroriststalking.wordpress.com/

Mind Hacks

Is there a pattern forming?

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1227694042

I asked this question after realising that an article about Truman Show delusion, Internet delusion and climate change delusion came out back in August 29, 2008. It was written by Sarah Kershaw and in the article she mentioned Joel and Ian Gold, both brothers. Both psychiatrists, one out of New York, one now in Toronto, who are writing about Truman show delusion.
The second article which you might be more familiar with is the New York Times article again by Sarah Kershaw, November 13, 2008, with mentions of Vaughan Bell, Dr Hoffman and unnamed concerned health professionals.

The third article is by Jennifer Peltz, where she writes about Truman Show Delusion, this came out 11/24/08. She also references the brothers Gold and Vaughan Bell again in the article.
Now wither or not it's a new trend to write about delusions or as some suspect an actual attempt by the system to give society the impression that people claiming to be watched are delusional is anyone's guess.

I was going back over my writings and I did want to make one thing clear. When I first read the Sarah Kershaw article, I wrote about it. Now the pen or in this case my typing fingers might have been a bit faster than my mind. What I mean is, I was looking back at what I wrote, and it seemed to be critical of the article. I never meant to be critical of the article, and I apologize if it came across that way. What I was actually concerned about was the new "syndromes" that had appeared in the article. Specifically the Internet Delusions and to a lesser extend the Truman show delusion.

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/?s=keep+the+faith

The first article by Sarah Kershaw was actually an interesting, informative and insightful read. It was a pretty well written article, I didn't mean that I wanted the article to fail. What I meant was that I had really specific concerns more specifically, about the findings that had been exposed in the article.

Here is some background information about my concerns. Since coming across the David Lawson book Terrorist Stalking in America and his conclusions that this is being done by vigilante groups and then his follow up book which claims this is being done by terrorist or anti-government groups, I have long suspected the work to be a disinformation piece that was meant to destroy and harm the credibility of targets should they go to the police or health professionals with his conclusions.

This is what I wrote about David Lawson back in December 2006.

[quote]If what he says about these stalking crews are true. These crews are illegal, dangerous, well connected and you would not want to be writing a book about their activities without consent. Members stay in the group out of fear, blackmail, the sense of power it gives them. The reason they work so well, and have become so powerful is because they work in secrecy. Secrecy, and yet he was allowed to write a book about them and go on his merry way?
No reprisals? No revenge? He is either really brave, and lucky. Really deceptive and wrong. Or maybe somewhere in between?[/quote]

Since then David Lawson has reappeared, his book is off the satellite stealing website, and it's now widely available at amazon, with the new conclusions, that this is being done by terrorist, and anti-government groups.

David Lawson claims to have been a detective for 12 years, then he claims that he was a part of these stalking groups for several more years. My question has always been, why was he allowed to write the book if they are so dangerous? He claims to have been one of them for several years, so how do we know he can be trusted? Later after doing my own research and talking to others, I realised that his conclusions were false and that a detective of 12 years could not have come to such false conclusions easily, especially one that claims to have travelled with them for several years. I have maintained that I think the book is disinformation.

I wondered if at some point the establishment would have an illness similar or one that matched his conclusions. After reading the article and doing some research, I came across this.

http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2005/05/internet_delusions.html

[quote]This paper analyzes four case-reports and notes that, contrary to the traditional view, the cases are examples where an internet-theme has particular clinical implications.
In one case, a patient began to have paranoid thoughts and used an internet search engine to investigate suspicions about an ingredient on a chewing gum packet.

Her searches led her to believe she had discovered a secret terrorist network, and was therefore being personally targeted by the authorities using phone taps and hidden cameras.[/quote]
I read over the case study, and the first case study presented was unrelated. My concerns however with these new findings is that they don't take current factors into consideration when making their diagnosis. Eg. The real danger that people's concerns about surveillance could have some basis in truth.

The other concern is the fact that there might be disinformation material being deliberately distributed to the public by specific sources. I am sure this is a foreign concept for many members of mainstream society, but practices such as Cointelpro have shown us that, false Media Stories, Faked dirty letters, poems, and satirical comic books were among the FBI’s many devices for pitting activists against one another.

In the past it was used to discredit dissidents, today it could be providing a similar function.

http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/electronic-publications/stay-free/archives/19/fbi.html