Measure for measure

Some people are cry babies. What they don't like for themselves they are perfectly happy to dish out to others. We see this all the time with the informants. They love to dish it out, but most can't take it and are just cry babies.

They can slander us, make up stuff about us, but the moment we throw the truth back into their faces about what they are, and the truth about the society that they live in and what they are taking part in many go ape, and freak out.

I really wonder about the types of people that have been created by this society, they like to think that they have control and power over others, but most have no real power, no true character to speak of, all they have is the fear they try to exert over others, or invoke in others Worms like this all too often are the cry babies that rise up in society. Worms that are all too often happy to dish it out, but point back a little truth in their direction and they can't take it and fall apart.

We see this all the time, with informants and the pack mentality. We see them have to gang up on targets, because they don't have power on their own, cowards, who are given position where better people should be.

Measure for measure, but that's a foreign language to them. They can dish it out, but they can't take it. The favorite thing for these creatures is an unfair fight, where two or more are beating up on one. They don't have any true power of their own, and use fear to control others, and each other.

What I find interesting about these cowardly attitudes is that if you even throw truth back in their face about how disgraceful their actions are, they can't take it. They are in complete denial about who they are, yet are often happy to make up the worst, insinuate the worst, and believe the worst about others. In other words they believe their garbage does not reek, when often it's what's smells in the room. This denial, and dehumanization of others is what allows these creatures to flourish, well for a little while anyways.

Being around people like this on a daily basis is a real lesson. Measure for measure is a concept they just don't understand. They get upset, I wonder how society create such creatures without any true character, but then I know the answer.

Measure for measure pound for pound, but a fair fight is not what these creature understand or are capable of. Honor where it may exist amongst thieves, does not seem to exist amongst snitches. (Again there are exceptions to every rule, but the longer some people are snitches, the more of their self they seem to loose, the longer they are snitches, the more of their humanity they seem to lose.)

Societies like this function for a time, but eventually a society where the worms rise to the top, will fail and fall. Measure for measure, pound for pound.

The Next Distraction

Bored Now.

Wake me up when the fake pandemic is over with. Oh wait it looks like it might be time. Yeah,
I call it a fake pandemic because I knew the media was really pushing this, but I did not know by how much till I came across these articles.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1240601754

http://www.theblogofrecord.com/tag/annual-flu-death-toll-per-year/

http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us_flu-related_deaths.htm

[quote]Questions and Answers Regarding Estimating Deaths from Influenza in the United States
How many people die from flu each year in the United States?

The number of influenza-associated (i.e., flu-related) deaths varies from year to year because flu seasons often fluctuate in length and severity. CDC estimated that about 36,000 people died of flu-related causes each year, on average, during the 1990s in the United States. This figure includes people dying from complications of flu. This estimate came from a 2003 study published in the Journal of the American Medication Association (JAMA), which looked at the 1990-91 through the 1998-99 flu seasons [10]. Statistical modeling was used to estimate how many flu-related deaths occurred among people whose underlying cause of death on their death certificate was listed as a respiratory or circulatory disease. During these years, the number of estimated deaths ranged from 17,000 to 52,000.

In 2009, CDC published additional estimates of flu-related deaths comparing different methods, including the methods used in the 2003 JAMA study. The seasons studied included the 1993-94 through the 2002-03 flu seasons [9]. Results from this study showed that during this time period, 36,171 flu-related deaths occurred per year, on average.

How did CDC estimate that an average of 36,000 people die in the U.S. each year from flu?
This statistic came from a 2003 JAMA study by CDC scientists [10]. The study used statistical modeling to estimate that during 9 influenza seasons from 1990-91 through 1998-99, an annual average of 36,000 flu-related deaths occurred among people whose underlying cause of death on their death certificate was listed as a respiratory or circulatory disease. A 2009 study that appeared in the journal Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses made a similar estimate for the 10 influenza seasons from 1993 to 2003 [9].
[/quote]

That is 3000 people per month that die of the regular influenza, but here we were getting death con 5 warnings from the CDC or WHO because I think 1 person died in the States? Don't get me wrong, every death matters, but it was a forced scenario and I kept wondering why? Was it just to see how people would react? To distract them from something else? To test the waters for the next big plague? They have spent the last two years trying to whip everyone into a frenzy about Avian Flu. Getting us mentally prepared that a global plague is inevitable. (Only if you make it so.)

They have their vials of Tamil flu ready and waiting, for them to make money, and to what make the public better? Many people question taking flu shots and there is good reason to, but that's another thread.

Does anyone else wonder what the real purpose of this distraction was? I mean people have been predicting it for some time. I have a much over due blog post about it, but it seems like they are going over board with the distractions.

Let's look at the year in review.

First we had the economic collapse. Remember the daily headlines? Economy expected to get worst, could be years before recovery, bleak times ahead, blah, blah, blah. That didn't exactly work. It worked for a time, but I don't think people are in the mood for another great depression.

They recently tried the low flying planes over New York to scare people into submission. It upset people more than scared them, so the Osama fake terror Bin Laden Bogeyman is not working like it use to, but they do keep trying.

Then we had plague the next distraction, and that also does not seem to have worked. I think people are just tired of it. I know I am.

Oh also is anyone else wondering how Swine Flu, Avian Flu, Human Influenza, came together, and the combination came from 2 different continents?

http://joerobertson.com/liberty/why-call-it-swine-flu-when-it-is-human-avian-swine-flu

[quote]EVERY Media source is leading with “Swine Flu” or “Swine Influenza”… Why? Or Why should anyone care?

Well, if you dig a little bit, you will find that the influenza outbreak in Mexico City and the US are a mutation of FOUR Viruses form THREE Continents… AND…

Creates a very “novel” strain that is not SWINE FLU… it is HUMAN-Avian-Swine-Flu!
It Is The Feared BIRD FLU Mutated to HUMANS and is being passed Human to Human… that is WHY it should not be dismissed as “JUST” another Swine Flu… because it is not!

And more IMPORTANT is Where and How did this thing Evolve and End Up in Mexico City? See my posts on the Baxter Cover-up that involves the World Health Organization…
The Avian Swine Flu Strain Created in the Lab[/quote]

http://www.thecitizen.com/~citizen0/node/36488

[quote]No Surprise: Flu Virus a Mixture of Swine, Human, and Avian Virus TypesWhen what is now called a “swine flu” was first reported last week to be infecting, and killing some people in Mexico, health officials noted it was a strain of flu never before seen. In fact, it is technically incorrect to call this simply a “swine” flu. Analyses showed it’s a mixture of swine, human and avian viruses, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Also, it is genetically different from the fully human H1N1 seasonal influenza virus that has been circulating globally for the past few years. After a review of the evidence, there is one conclusion: the new flu virus contains DNA from avian, swine viruses (including elements from European and Asian viruses) and human viruses.

So did this curious mixture just develop naturally, out of the blue? Is it the result of inhumane farming practices, as the Humane Society of the United States (http://www.hsus.org/) has suggested, that exposes immune-compromised pigs to all sorts of animal and human feces?

Well, maybe. But let’s go back and look at the facts to see if any other scenario could be possible.
First of all, there’s the troublesome detail that the virus has elements that come from multiple continents. Then there’s the fact that true swine flu is only rarely transmissible to humans — this flu is spreading human-to-human, most likely because it contains DNA from human flu.
Could someone have deliberately mixed these viruses together? Is that possible? Absolutely.[/quote]

http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/02/27/8560781.html

[quote]

Baxter: Product contained live bird flu virus

People familiar with biosecurity rules are dismayed by evidence that human H3N2 and avian H5N1 viruses somehow co-mingled in the Orth-Donau facility. That is a dangerous practice that should not be allowed to happen, a number of experts insisted.

Accidental release of a mixture of live H5N1 and H3N2 viruses could have resulted in dire consequences. While H5N1 doesn’t easily infect people, H3N2 viruses do. If someone exposed to a mixture of the two had been simultaneously infected with both strains, he or she could have served as an incubator for a hybrid virus able to transmit easily to and among people.

That mixing process, called reassortment, is one of two ways pandemic viruses are created. There is no suggestion that happened because of this accident, however. “We have no evidence of any reassortment, that any reassortment may have occurred,” said Andraghetti. “And we have no evidence of any increased transmissibility of the viruses that were involved in the experiment with the ferrets in the Czech Republic.” [/quote]

Wow live virus samples in that could have incubated and could have become a pandemic virus.

So what's next? Project Blue Beam? Holograms across the globe? Are we going to get a taste of their UFO's? Secret government air craft that they have been keeping a secret just like the stealth boomers?

Who knows what the next distraction will be. What will they use to keep control of the sheep?
What will they do to scare them?

Much like a soap opera, I am starting to loose interest. Thanks to your programing people to have become so attention deficient that they have the attention spans of three year olds, most people have probably also lost interest as well.

Well till it's time for the next distraction.

"And in case I don't see ya.... good afternoon, good evening, and goodnight." The Truman Show.

Britney Spears Prisoner?

I have been following up on the Britney Spears situation, so this post goes out to the people who know her and might actually be in a situation to assist her.

I don't like to speculate about the lives of celebrities, but we are told Britney is all healed up right? She is back on stage singing provocative songs like F.U.C.K ME (If you seek Amy) and other numbers. Her body is back in shape and she is on tour. Things are fine right?

The problem is I don't know that things are fine. Britney who fought for custody of her boys, even going so far as to have an armed standoff with the police to keep them with her gave up custody of the boys last year. Kevin Federline now has sole custody and Britney has visitation rights, sort of.

http://www.usmagazine.com/britney-spears-gives-kevin-federline-sole-custody-of-boys

[quote]Spears currently has monitored, twice-a-week visitation with her boys, as well as one overnight-a-week.
She lost all visitation rights in January she was hospitalized at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.[/quote]

Twice a week supervised visitation. and one overnight a week, which I imagine is also supervised?

Britney does not have control of her own money. She is well enough to perform like a trained doll in front of the audience, but she is not well enough to have control of her money? Shouldn't people be asking questions about this?

http://www.usmagazine.com/news/lawyer-britney-spears-compares-dads-control-to-prison-200914

[quote]Britney Spears' life under her dad's conservatorship is like "prison," a lawyer for her former manager, Sam Lutfi, charged today in a hearing at L.A. Superior Court.

John Anderson testified he was contacted by another lawyer, John Eardley, to represent Britney in her fight against the conservatorship (which gives Jamie Spears control over her personal and financial affairs). He also says Jamie's control is causing the singer "emotional distress [that is ongoing] now."[/quote]

I hate that picture of her. The look does not suit.

http://home.nzcity.co.nz/news/article.aspx?id=99538&fm=newsmain,nrhl

[quote]Jamie filed for a restraining order against both men earlier this year, claiming they had harassed Britney, 27.

The ruling follows evidence given by Jamie and Britney's hairstylist and bodyguard, who all claimed the 'Womanizer' singer was scared of Lutfi.

Last month, Britney's former boyfriend paparazzi photographer Adnan Ghalib was also given a three-year restraining order barring him from seeing the star.[/quote]

So based on the word of her dad, and a hair dresser, Britney Spears who is 27 years old, almost 30 has no say in who can come near her, and she has no control of her money. Yet she is ok enough to be prancing around on stage like a blank doll?

This next bit I found really worrisome.

http://snarkfood.com/britney-spears-wanted-sam-lufti-to-rescue-her-from-daddy/

[quote] “[Britney] told me she wanted to get a hold of Sam,” said Christina, 25, whose brother had once been Spears’s manager. “She wanted him to help her find a lawyer, and wanted someone to get a prepaid cell phone to her. She was scared because her father was blackmailing her with visitation rights over her kids.” Spears allegedly told Christina to meet her on the fifth floor gym of the Peninsula Hotel on Jan. 16. When Christina arrived, Spears was working out with her mother while a bodyguard stood nearby. But they rendezvoused in a sauna where Christina gave her a phone, saying it was from Sam and ex-boyfriend Adnan Ghalib, which Spears then hid in a locker. “She asked me, ‘Will Sam be able to help me?’” Christina added.
The phone, however, was later discovered by Spears’s security team and confiscated from her purse.
[/quote]

The next thing I found really worrisome is that he lawyer was being kept away from her. I had been keeping an eye on Britney, because he meltdown and the events around it, made me think she might not be crazy, but a targeted individual made to look crazy. The scary part is if it's true, it means someone with the fame, fortune and celebrity of Britney could have this happen to her.

Remember at her low point she had the kids taken from her, her money, and she was locked away. Also those who might have been trying to help her, were kept away from her. What can someone under those conditions do? Yet she has millions of fans, and none of them are asking the questions, or putting together a free Britney site on facebook? At the very least Britney is a grown adult who's life is being controlled by forces outside of her control, and those paying to see her parade on stage should ask themselves why? If she is well enough to perform like a trained doll why is she not well enough to be in charge of her own money and life? Why is her lawyer being kept from her?

Don't forget that those bodyguards that her dad hired still control her movements. This should worry a lot of people, but it doesn't. All those so called screaming and adoring fans, should be all over this and asking some real questions.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090428/entertainment/us_people_britney_spears_1

[quote]as ordered Britney Spears' former manager and a lawyer to stay away from the pop singer for the next three years.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aviva Bobb issued her ruling Tuesday after hearing testimony and arguments in recent weeks from the men and lawyers for Spears' father, Jamie. [/quote]

Her lawyer now has to stay away from her? Was the judge paid off? Does he know something that we don't know?

[quote]Lawyers for Lutfi and Eardley promised to appeal the ruling, saying the lengthy hearing didn't prove the singer suffered substantial emotional distress as a result of the men's actions.
Lutfi's lawyer, Bryan Freedman, said evidence instead pointed to Spears asking his client for help.

"Never before in the history of the world has a restraining order been issued against someone who merely responded to cries for help," Freedman said. [/quote]

I find it odd as well. Why can't the lawyer challenge the fact that someone is in control of Britney's life other than Britney?

[quote]Freedman said the conservatorship was misusing a statute meant for the elderly or severely disabled adults to protect a singer who is currently on an international concert tour.
The singer remains on a tour promoting her most recent album, "Circus." She did not appear during hearings on the petitions, despite repeated requests by Lutfi and Eardley's lawyers to have the singer testify.

Her life remains closely managed by her father, who can restrict her contact with outsiders and controls her access to a cell phone. [/quote]

Britney not asked or rather not allowed to testify? Does this seem shady to anyone else? Yet all these people claim to be her fans. They all go to her shows, but they don't question the fact that she might be in serious trouble and being held captive by her Dad?

She according to sources, does not have access to cellphones, the bodyguards watch her every move. She can be on tour, but not in control of her own money? Any nobody questions this?

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizarre/usa/article2341438.ece

[quote]The singer has sent a barrage of text messages to Adnan begging him to help her get out of living under the control of her father.

But Ghalib, 36, is unable to reply because he has been ordered by a judge not to communicate with Britney for three years.

A source said: “She keeps sneaking messages to Adnan begging him to help her win back her freedom.

“She says she is lonely and misses being able to date the men she chooses. She feels trapped.
“She has been begging him to meet her and help her come up with a plan to get out of her dad’s conservatorship.

“Some messages have got back to her via her hairdressers and style team - but Adnan cannot contact her otherwise he will face jail.”[/quote]

Add to this the fact that Adnan is in some bizarre trouble. As I was following up on his story, it sounds like he is being provoked. Now he is being threatened with deportation, for allegedly hitting or driving at one of those people who sound like they were helping to keep him away from Britney.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1161420/Britneys-ex-Adnan-Ghalib-faces-deportation-Afghanistan-guilty-assault-charges.html

[quote]Ghalib, 36, is charged with assault with a deadly weapon, hit-and-run and battery.
The charges relate to an incident on 11 February in Los Angeles when a court official tried to serve him with a restraining order to stay away from Britney.

The restraining order was issued by the singer's father, Jamie Spears, who has taken control of her affairs.

Ghalib allegedly tried to run over the court official - the charge of use of a deadly weapon relates to his car.

The photographer moved to Birmingham from Afghanistan with his family when he was five years old, and he works in the US.[/quote]

I also find it interesting that her new album is called blackout.

If Britney is in trouble, then it sounds like they are trying to remove the people from her life who could help her. If her dad really is keeping her a virtual prisoner, and it's possible, then we need to hear from Britney, but it does not sound like she is free to state her case.

Under the circumstances what can she do? I don't think it's up to her, I think it's up to the so called fans who claim to love her, and who buy the tickets to her show, to ask questions. To wonder why lawyers are being kept away from her, lawyers who claim she is a virtual prisoner to her dads control. Why she can be on some tour, but not have full access to the money she is making from those tours. Why a 27 year old woman, has to have bodyguards choosen by her dad wherever she goes. I think her fans have to ask if Adnan or even Lufti could be telling the truth and if so what does that mean for Britney, who they claim to love so much.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaCteNxtzfM
http://www.actressarchives.com/news.php?id=15542

[quote]Yesterday we reported that a woman who is believed to be Britney left a voice message with her lawyer, asking what happens to her custody agreement if her father's conservatorship is ended. Expect Britney Spears to start fighting back like never before in the coming months. And expect it to be a "circus" of its very own. [/quote]

[quote]Hi my name’s Britney Spears. I called you earlier. I’m calling again because I just wanted to make sure that during the process of eliminating the conservatorship that my father has threatened me several times, you know, he’ll take my children away. I just want to be guaranteed that everything will be fine with the process of you guys taking care of everything that things will stay the same as far as my custodial time.That’s it, bye.[/quote]

If that voicemail is Britney then as late as March she was asking for help. People seem to be just walking around in a maze. It is possible that she is in trouble, and if she is really asking for help, then her fans, so called fans could go a long way towards ensuring that there is enough light shone on the situation to help her get the assistance that she needs.

http://news.celebritywonder.com/2009/04/02/Prisoner_Britney_Spears.html

There is no denying that Britney made some bad choices on her own, but what's ongoing now sounds very worrisome, and it would be good if her fans would look into it on her behalf.

http://www.celebuzz.com/video-britney-spears-feels-like-s65111/

[quote]"I think it’s too in control. If I wasn’t under the restraints I’m under, I’d feel so liberated. When I tell them the way I feel, it’s like they hear but they’re really not listening. If you do something wrong in your work, you can move on, but I’m having to pay for a long time. I never wanted to become one of those prisoner people. I always wanted to feel free."
MTV's For the Record airs Sunday, November 30, at 10 p.m.[/quote]

Dollhouse

Dollhouse,
http://watching-tv.ew.com/2009/03/dollhouse-joss.html?iid=top25-'Dollhouse'+becomes+pleasingly+complex%2C+with+more+info+and+action
Hey people, I forgot to share, for those of you interested in topics of mind control, you might want to check out the new series called Dollhouse, check out episode 6, that way you can decide if you want to watch the series.
It's about these people who have their minds wiped and then any personality can be implanted and made to do anything. So you have dolls for sex, dolls for assassination, eg, beheadings, dolls for the hero roll, etc.
I think it might be a series you will want to catch, and I forgot to share this with you all earlier. The series just started in Feb and yes it is by the creator of Buffy The Vampire Slayer, but it's totally relevant to what's happening in the world now, and it has some great concepts.
There are also several great articles about how Joss and Eliza came up with the concept for the series if anyone wants to read them, just let me know.
Ok that's my share for today.

Homeschooling Banned in California. School shooting in Finland

Another school shooting has just happened in Finland. This school shooting comes less than a year after the other Finnish School shooting.

Almost a year ago, Pekka-Eric killed several of his class mates and left behind a note, saying:

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2007/11/

[quote]Collective deindividualization is a phenomenon where individual will be trained as part of the mindless herd controlled by state, corporation, church or some other organization, group, ideology, religion or mass delusion system and adopt it’s rules, morality and codes of conduct.

This phenomenon has been familiar in all despotic, authoritarian, totalitarian, monarchist, communist, socialist, nazi, fascist and religious societies troughout history. Also, the modern western democratic republics have the same phenomenon. It is just done so that people will think they are free and don’t realize they are being enslaved. Majority of people in society are weak-minded and ignorant retards, masses that act like programmed robots and accept voluntarily slavery. But not me! I am self-aware and realize what is going on in society! I have a free mind! And I choose to be free rather than live like a robot or slave. You can say I have a “god complex”, sure… then you have a “group complex”! Compared to you retarded masses, I am actually godlike.

Totalitarian governments rule people through education system, consumerism, mass media, monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force (police, military) and laws discriminating people who think differently than the majority. Democracy… you think democracy means freedom and justice? You are wrong. Democracy is a dictatorship of the moral majority… and the majority is manipulated and ruled by the state mafia. Modern western democracy has nothing to do with freedom or justice; it is totalitarian and corrupted system. Laws are made over the heads of the people and people are being brainwashed to support the system and connected to the institutional structures immediately after their birth. Societies are being ruled by manipulative and charismatic politicians who only care about the interests of majority, and who do not base their decisions on reason but emotions and feelings of the masses. These masses let the authorities of state to make all the important decisions for them. The masses will get an education, they study, get a job, go to work and vote in elections. They think they are free and don’t criticise or question the system. They have become robots. It is like a constructed mechanism in mind, that leaves little choice for an individual to think, talk and act independently.[/quote]

[quote]Long live the revolution… revolution against the system, which enslaves not only the majority of weak-minded masses but also the small minority of strong-minded and intelligent individuals! If we want to live in a different world, we must act. We must rise against the enslaving, corrupted and totalitarian regimes and overthrow the tyrants, gangsters and the rule of idiocracy. I can’t alone change much but hopefully my actions will inspire all the intelligent people of the world and start some sort of revolution against the current systems. The system discriminating naturality and justice, is my enemy. The people living in the world of delusion and supporting this system are my enemies.[/quote]

Today another shooting has occurred and this young man has also expressed a great deal of anger towards humanity. It's still yet unknown if his motivation was the same as Pekka-Eric's.
[quote]Media reports named the gunman as Matti Juhani Saari, 22, a trainee chef at the vocational college.

The suspect posted a video of himself on the internet last week firing a gun.
As a result of this, police interviewed him on Monday but decided they did not have enough evidence to revoke his licence, the interior minister said. [/quote]

[quote]The gunman, dressed in black and wearing a ski mask, was seen entering the building with a large bag. Shots were fired soon afterwards. [/quote]

It's weird that he was wearing a ski mask. One thing is for certain, this will just move Finland one step closer to gun control bans. Previous to these two shooting, there was very little it seems to worry about.

Will problem, reaction, solution strategy be implemented here?

I am still wondering about the ski mask?

In other news. California has banned home schooling. That's right, in case you don't want your five year old's learning sex ed in schools. Getting shot, stabbed, programmed by the state to be mindless autobots, who are incapable of thinking, and only following orders, you soon will not have a choice, if you live in California.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1056415/Teach-pleasure-gay-sex-children-young-say-researchers.html

[quote]Children as young as five should be taught to understand the pleasures of gay sex, according to leaders of a taxpayer-funded education project.
Heads of the project have set themselves a goal of 'creating primary classrooms where queer sexualities are affirmed and celebrated'.

The ambition was revealed in documents prepared for the No Outsiders project run by researchers from universities and backed with £600,000 of public money provided by the Economic and Social Research Council[/quote]

Is it just me, or is it too much to ask that kids get to grades 4,6,7 before their sex ed begins? Oh well, those boring old fashioned values.

I am sorry, but I don't think 5 year old's should be learning sex ed. They are so busy with trying to understand the world, their minds should be free to think about important things like in 3 years, they can be jr street watchers (Snitches) for the state.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1052962/Schoolchildren-recruited-councils-spy-neighbours-drop-litter.html

[quote]Army of spies: Children are being trained by councils to report neighbours who drop litter or commit 'bin crimes' Children are being offered money by councils to spy on neighbours and report petty offences such as 'bin crimes' and dog-fouling.

The youngsters are among 5,000 residents encouraged to photograph or video neighbours in the act of 'environmental crimes'.

In some cases children as young as eight, are being bribed with rewards of £500 for passing on the names of neighbours or taking down their car registration numbers.

The Daily Telegraph found that one in six councils out of 240 contacted admitted to signing up the 'environmental volunteers.'[/quote]

Thank goodness we as a society have taken the time to remove the truly dangerous things from their lives, like God, family values, and self esteem. We have made them see the errors of their ways, and tuned them into what is really important. A generation later we are seeing some of the fruits of those labours.

Anyways, here is the main story. In California it is now illegal to home school kids. We want to make sure the state has their minds, from birth cause that is the only way you can control a society, is by going after the children.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=4794

[quote]A California appeals court has ruled that homeschooling of children is illegal unless their parents have teaching credentials from the state.

“California is now on the path to being the only state to deny the vast majority of homeschooling parents their fundamental right to teach their own children at home,” said Michael Smith, president of the Home School Legal Defense Association.

The court overturned a lower court’s finding that homeschooling did not constitute a violation of child welfare laws.

“California courts have held that … parents do not have a constitutional right to homeschool their children,” Justice H. Walter Croskey said.

The decision stunned parents of the state’s roughly 166,000 homeschooled children. While the court claimed that it was merely clarifying an existing law and not making a new one, the decision leaves the parents of homeschooled children at risk of arrest and criminal prosecution.
“At first, there was a sense of, ‘No way,’ ” homeschool parent Loren Mavromati said. “Then there was a little bit of fear. I think it has moved now into indignation.”

Parents’ reasons for homeschooling their children range from religious beliefs to dissatisfaction with the education received at public or private schools. But according to the court, all California children between the ages of 6 and 18 must attend either a full-time public or private school or be taught by a tutor credentialed for their specific grade level.

“A primary purpose of the educational system is to train school children in good citizenship, patriotism and loyalty to the state and the nation,” Croskey wrote.
California’s largest teachers union welcomed the decision as did the Children’s Law Center of Los Angeles.

According to the law center’s executive director, Leslie Heimov, children should not be educated at home, because they need to be “in a place daily where they would be observed by people who had a duty to ensure their ongoing safety.” [/quote]

Good patriots, loyal to the state and nation. Yes Russia did that, the kids were so loyal to the state, that they turned in their parents. Hitler did that also didn't he? Before you can change the society, you must indoctrinate the minds of the children. We as a society stand by consistently and let these changes happen, and then we get the end results and act all surprised and horrified, and wonder what the connection could be.

Social control and conformity. Part 2.

Part 2 on trying to understand why people do the things they do. Please read part one first. Much more recent.

The Third Wave

The third wave was a creative and ingenious idea from a school teacher, who wanted to help his high school class understand how average German citizens could have gone along with the holocaust.

http://www.ronjoneswriter.com/wave.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Third_Wave

Remember that after just 4 days these kids were getting out of control. You really have to read the experiment to believe it. I also understand that they have tried this on much younger children as well. These kids were forming groups, doing their own version of the hail Hitler sign (third wave), they were ratting each other out, and expelling other students who did not want to go along with the experiment. It really does not take long, or take much.

[quote]The experiment took on a life of its own, with students from all over the school joining in: on the third day the class expanded from initial 30 students to 43 attendees. All of the students showed drastic improvement in their academic skills and tremendous motivation. All of the students were issued a member card and each of them received a special assignment (like designing a Third Wave Banner, stopping non-members from entering the class, etc). Jones instructed the students on how to initiate new members, and by the end of the day the movement had over 200 participants.[3] At this point first Jones was surprised that some of the students started reporting to him other members of the movement who failed to abide by the rules.[3]

On Thursday, the fourth day of the experiment, Jones decided to terminate the movement because it was slipping out of his control.[/quote]

This was middle class America in the 70's I believe, hard to believe, that these kids could be conformed so easily, but there it was.

[b]Give people a common goal, agenda, some unity, a common enemy, throw in just a little power and watch them go at it, and it does not take long. [/b]

Next time, the Stanford Prison Experiment. Same game different setting.

Tell me what I am thinking?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_art icle_id=527397&in_page_id=1965

[quote]Brain scan: Scientists have developed a mind-reading technique Scientists have developed a mind-reading technique which could one day allow them to take pictures of memories and dreams.

By comparing brain activity scans, they were able to correctly predict which of 120 pictures someone was focusing on in 90 per cent of cases.
The technique could one day form the basis of a machine to project the imagination on to a screen.

Professor Jack Gallant led the Californian research team.

Writing in the journal Nature, he said: "It may soon be possible to reconstruct a picture of a person's visual experience from measurements of brain activity alone.
"Imagine a general brainreading device that could reconstruct a picture of a person's visual experience at any moment in time."[/quote]

Considering that by the time we usually hear about such inventions they have usually been in use by Military or other bodies for some time, let's imagine how really much more advanced this might actually be?

Wow something that will record my dreams and memories. That would be really cool. Maybe Gang Stalking targets could package the dreams and memories given to us as Targeted Individuals and deliver them as presents to those that have helped stalk and torture us. Kind of like the little gift given near the end of the movie the crow. (When Eric gives the memories he's been carrying around, all at once.) Maybe those who have helped form all these memories and dreams would like to have a taste of the fun memories that they have helped to create? Probably not.

Anyways on to other fun scientific news.
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/03/mri_vision

[quote]Tell me what you see.
On second thought, don't: A computer will soon be able to do it, simply by analyzing the activity of your brain.

That's the promise of a decoding system unveiled this week in Nature by neuroscientists from the University of California at Berkeley.

The scientists used a functional magnetic resonance imaging machine -- a real-time brain scanner -- to record the mental activity of a person looking at thousands of random pictures: people, animals, landscapes, objects, the stuff of everyday visual life. With those recordings the researchers built a computational model for predicting the mental patterns elicited by looking at any other photograph. When tested with neurological readouts generated by a different set of pictures, the decoder passed with flying colors, identifying the images seen with unprecedented accuracy.

"No one that I know would ever have guessed our decoder would do this well," study co-author Jack Gallant said.

As the decoder is refined, it could be used to explore the phenomenon of visual attention -- concentration on one part of a complicated scene -- and then to illuminate the dimly understood intricacies of the mind's eyes.

"One day it may even be possible to reconstruct the visual content of dreams," Gallant said.
After that, the decoding model could be harnessed for more visionary purposes: early warning systems for neurological diseases or interfaces that allow paralyzed people to engage with the world.

Other uses may not be so noble, such as marketing campaigns crafted for maximum mental penetration or invasions of mental privacy mounted in the name of fighting terrorism and crime.
Those technologies remain decades away, but researchers say it's not too soon to think about them, especially if research progresses at the pace set by this study.

Earlier decoders could only tell whether someone looked at a general type of image -- at a dog, for example -- but couldn't identify more specific photos, such as a small dog eating a bone. They've also been incapable of predicting what thought patterns an image would provoke.
The Berkeley model overcame both those limitations.
[/quote]

It's weird, but I have heard targets speak of things like this before. It's a subject that I have heard mentioned in the Targeted Individual community. People who have stated that the people harassing them were describing what they were looking at in real time. Interesting.

Anyways, it's always nice to keep up on the latest scientific mumbo jumbo. Imagine how the world will be shaped, or rather is probably already being shaped by these devices that we are just hearing about, but which have probably been around and available for some time now.

So you want a revolution 2

I had complied this blog post under a different title, and I had also tried to draw comparisons to the latest school shooting and the school shooting last year in America where the words let the revolution begin were also posted.

I thought it was interesting that at least two school shooters had used the same words. Anyways for some reason I can't find the post on my computer, [b]which has been acting weird over the last few days. [/b]

Anyways, I am not going to spend a lot of time trying to recompile the ideas, so instead I am just going to repost the manifesto that was left behind by the finnish school shooter.
I again think that his choose in killing was misguided, his frustrations were understood, but I just can't see the point of taking innocent lives. I don't think his actions accomplished anything. Well they will get people talking, but I don't think they established the kind of change he was referencing to.

I also personally don't believe in natural selection, or evolution and so on those points I can't agree with anything he says. Where I do see relavance in his postings are the points he makes about democracy not being really free, and that's it's just another tyranical system. Also about the fact that most people are conformed to the system. I also do belive that it's corrupt, and I would also like to see a change for the better come about. However I would like to see a change come about via dialouge and people waking realising that this system is not right, that it is corrupt and we need to fix it, revamp it or whatever.

I however do not think this was the way to do it. So enough about me, this is the writing from Pekka-Eric the young man who did the latest school shooting. For me personally the revolution I believe in is truth, and before the media completly spin this and blame it on music, bullying or something else, he makes it very clear that he knew what he was doing, he was not going for a school shooting, he wanted his actions to be considered as political, and he did it because he had had enough of this corrupt system.

[quote]
Natural Selector’s Manifesto
How Did Natural Selection Turn Into Idiocratic Selection?
Today the process of natural selection is totally misguided. It has reversed. Human race has been devolving very long time for now. Retarded and stupid , weak-minded people are reproducing more and faster than the intelligent, strong-minded people. Laws protect the retarded majority which selects the leaders of society. Modern human race has not only betrayed its ancestors, but the future generations too. Homo Sapiens, HAH! It is more like a Homo Idioticus to me! When I look at people I see every day in society, school and everywhere... I can’t say I belong to same race as the lousy, miserable, arrogant, selfish human race! No! I have evolved one step above!

Naturality has been discriminated through religions, ideologies, laws and other mass delusion systems. Individual, who is going through his/hers natural power process and trying to live naturally, but is being told that the way he acts or thinks is wrong and stupid, will usually have some reactions which might be considered as "psychological disorders" by the establishment. In reality they are just natural reactions to the disruption of natural power process. They will have some of the following (depending on individual's personality): feelings of inferiority / superiority, hostility, aggression, frustration, depression, self-hatred / hatred towards other people, suicidal / homicidal thought etc... and it is completely normal.

Humans are just a species among other animals and world does not exist only for humans. Death and killing is not a tragedy, it happens in nature all the time between all species. Not all human lives are important or worth saving. Only superior (intelligent, self-aware, strong-minded) individuals should survive while inferior (stupid, retarded, weak-minded masses) should perish.
There is also another solution to the problem: stupid people as slaves and intelligent people as free. What I mean is that they who have free minds, are capable of intelligent existential and philosophical thinking and know what justice is, should be free and rulers... and the robotic masses, they can be slaves since they do not mind it now either and because their minds are on so retarded level. The gangsters that now rule societies, would of course get what they deserve.
Of course there is a final solution too: death of entire human race. It would solve every problem of humanity. The faster human race is wiped out from this planet, the better... no one should be left alive. I have no mercy for the scum of earth, the pathetic human race.

Collective Deindividualization: Totalitarianism & Delusions Of Democracy
[b]Collective deindividualization is a phenomenon where individual will be trained as part of the mindless herd controlled by state, corporation, church or some other organization, group, ideology, religion or mass delusion system and adopt it's rules, morality and codes of conduct. This phenomenon has been familiar in all despotic, authoritarian, totalitarian, monarchist, communist, socialist, nazi, fascist and religious societies troughout history. Also, the modern western democratic republics have the same phenomenon. It is just done so that people will think they are free and don't realize they are being enslaved. Majority of people in society are weak-minded and ignorant retards, masses that act like programmed robots and accept voluntarily slavery. But not me! I am self-aware and realize what is going on in society! I have a free mind! And I choose to be free rather than live like a robot or slave. You can say I have a “god complex”, sure... then you have a “group complex”! Compared to you retarded masses, I am actually godlike. [/b]

[b]Totalitarian governments rule people through education system, consumerism, mass media, monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force (police, military) and laws discriminating people who think differently than the majority. Democracy... you think democracy means freedom and justice? You are wrong. Democracy is a dictatorship of the moral majority... and the majority is manipulated and ruled by the state mafia. Modern western democracy has nothing to do with freedom or justice; it is totalitarian and corrupted system. Laws are made over the heads of the people and people are being brainwashed to support the system and connected to the institutional structures immediately after their birth. Societies are being ruled by manipulative and charismatic politicians who only care about the interests of majority, and who do not base their decisions on reason but emotions and feelings of the masses. These masses let the authorities of state to make all the important decisions for them. The masses will get an education, they study, get a job, go to work and vote in elections. They think they are free and don’t criticise or question the system. They have become robots. It is like a constructed mechanism in mind, that leaves little choice for an individual to think, talk and act independently. [/b]

Three Kinds Of Humans
There are three kinds of human personality types in this world: individualistic human (3% of the world population) manipulative human (3% of the world population) mass human (94% of the world population)
#1 & #2 type of personalities are intelligent, creative and self-aware. They have chosen bit different paths paths. #3 type of personalities are less intelligent and less creative, weak-minded people controlled by #2 type of personalities. The percentages are only estimations though but are based on Gaussian distribution and history of human race and how humans have organized into societies. And this is the way it has always been ever since humans started to organize into communities.
Another way how to divide people is bit different but is based on the same facts, human nature and history. The division is based on the level of intelligence and quality of mentality: intelligent (3% of the world population) slightly retarded, so called “normal people” or “robots” (94% of the world population) highly retarded, “vegetables” (3% of the world population)

Total War Against Humanity
Hate, Im so full of it and I love it. That is one thing I really love. Some time ago, I used to believe in humanity and I wanted to live a long and happy life... but then I woke up. I started to think deeper and realized things. But it was not easy to become existential... knowing as much as I know has made me unhappy, frustrated and angry. I just can’t be happy in the society or the reality I live. Due to long process of existential thinking, observing the society I live and some other things happened in my life... I have come to the point where I feel nothing but hate against humanity and human race.

Life is just a meaningless coincidence... result of long process of evolution and many several factors, causes and effects. However, life is also something that an individual wants and determines it to be. And I'm the dictator and god of my own life. And me, I have chosen my way. I am prepared to fight and die for my cause. I, as a natural selector, will eliminate all who I see unfit, disgraces of human race and failures of natural selection.

You might ask yourselves, why did I do this and what do I want. Well, most of you are too arrogant and closed-minded to understand... You will proprably say me that I am “insane”, “crazy”, “psychopath”, “criminal” or crap like that. No, the truth is that I am just an animl, a human, an individual, a dissident.

I have had enough. I don’t want to be part of this fucked up society. Like some other wise people have said in the past, human race is not worth fighting for or saving... only worth killing. But... When my enemies will run and hide in fear when mentioning my name... When the gangsters of the corrupted governments have been shot in the streets... When the rule of idioracy and the democratic system has been replaced with justice... When intelligent people are finally free and rule the society instead of the idiocratic rule of majority... In that great day of deliverance, you will know what I want.

[b]Long live the revolution... revolution against the system, which enslaves not only the majority of weak-minded masses but also the small minority of strong-minded and intelligent individuals! If we want to live in a different world, we must act. We must rise against the enslaving, corrupted and totalitarian regimes and overthrow the tyrants, gangsters and the rule of idiocracy. I can’t alone change much but hopefully my actions will inspire all the intelligent people of the world and start some sort of revolution against the current systems. The system discriminating naturality and justice, is my enemy. The people living in the world of delusion and supporting this system are my enemies. [/b]

I am ready to die for a cause I know is right, just and true... even if I would lose or the battle would be only remembered as evil... I will rather fight and die than live a long and unhappy life.
And remember that this is my war, my ideas and my plans. Don’t blame anyone else for my actions than myself. Don’t blame my parents or my friends. I told nobody about my plans and I always kept them inside my mind only. Don’t blame the movies I see, the music I hear, the games I play or the books I read. No, they had nothing to do with this. This is my war: one man war against humanity, governments and weak-minded masses of the world! No mercy for the scum of the earth! HUMANITY IS OVERRATED! It's time to put NATURAL SELECTION & SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST back on tracks!

Justice renders to everyone his due.

- Pekka-Eric Auvinen (aka NaturalSelector89, Natural Selector, Sturmgeist89 and Sturmgeist). I also use pseydonym Eric von Auffoin internationally. [/quote]

I keep thinking and wondering if this could have been prevented if there was activly more open dialouge by people like him about the frustration of living in a controlled society like this and finding out the truth. Of the research that I have been able to do, he had a myspace profile, youtube account with over 200,000 views, but I don't know what the videos were. Just what the media is saying about the videos.

He seems to have had friends, because they posted a youtube memorial for him. It's just somewhere along the way he saw this as the only way and I think that is sad, sad for the other kids, who died and sad for him too.

He felt this way and wanted a chance. He came to the realisation of the truth, I guess realised that things were not going to change overnight, and in his own words did not want to live and be unhappy for years.

For some he believed in evolution and natural selection and decided it would be ok to take out others, and that is just so wrong. I wish he would have written a book, or kept on talking, posting whatever.

Unfortunatly his actions will most likely negate the relavant parts of his words, and people will just remember him as a nutter, and try to blame the music, movies, video games, or gun laws, instead of looking at what he really said about why he did what he did, which was trying to make a political statement and rebelling against this controlled slave society we live in.

I can only hope that by faciliating more open dialouge and discussions about this topic, that maybe it will help other choose a different path, and make different choices that does not involve the loss of innocent lives, unnessacarily.

What is making us NOT fight back?

I came across this most excellent post, and after following all the requirments below, felt embolded to reprint it. I think it's worth a blog post.

Attribution.
Author: Dock6
Affiliation: AboveTopSecret.com
Title: What is making us NOT fight back?
Link: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread202159/pg1#pid2123735
posted on 5-4-2006 @ 09:33 AM

Excellent post ! I think many people are asking themselves the same questions as those you've posed.
You're right: sixty years ago this situation could never have evolved. A hundred a sixty years ago, no politician or group of politicians would have dared attempt the repressive control of populations as is now occurring.

But maybe I'm wrong. Pearl Harbour for example --- the radar technicians were stood down, apparently, in order the Japanese could launch their fatal attacks. Did those radar technicians come forward? Not even ONE of them? I don't think we can accept that not one of them, or even six of them, did not examine their conscience and decide they must reveal what they knew.
So how come we only learned about the betrayal that was Pearl Harbour, a few years ago? How come for all those decades, we believed that the Japanese had somehow achieved the impossible by bombing Pearl Harbour? How come we didn't ask ourselves: ' Hey ! How the hell did those Japs get so CLOSE to Pearl without being detected???? What the hell were the radar guys doing .... sleeping? '

But we didn't ask, did we? And no one told us. Instead, we watched all the movies and tv shows and books .... and we bought their story: we suspended our critical faculties and simply accepted what we were told and shown.
How come the media of the day didn't ask: ' Hey! How the hell did it happen? What were the radar guys doing?'. And it's interesting, when you think of it, that not ONE of those radar guys' stories made it into the mainstream media of the day? How come the betrayal of Pearl Harbour was not exposed, way back then?

So, the media has been manipulating us a long time, without our even realising it, back then.
Another factor is the 'one in twenty' theory. Apparently, administrators of jails and POW camps, etc., *find* the one in twenty, and isolate them. The one in twenty is the one who initiates action; who motivates the remaining 19; who acts as natural leader. The one in twenty is smarter, more capable, more independently minded than the other 19. The other 19 can be restrained with minimum effort; they are sheep-like, relatively obdedient; are 'followers'. Get rid of the one in twenty, and your job of controlling the other 19 is easy. Perhaps repressive regimes are actively seeking the 'ones in twenty' within our midst. They might find them at protest rallies; in internet forums; etc. They are the first to be picked off. Perhaps they've *already* been picked off, which might account for all us sheepies, just sitting here in confusion and dismay, waiting for our 'leaders' to come and show us what to do to save ourselves ?
Then there's testosterone. It's what makes men fiesty; willing to take on aggressors and repressors. Knock out the testosterone and men become malleable: peaceable; hesitant; unsure; docile. It's been shown that men can be (and are being?) turned into a form of psuedo-female, via chemicals contained in foods, drinks, food and drink wrappings and containers, etc.
Another means of putting men out of balance and unsure of their role and capabilities, is to kick their confidence around on daily basis. We've been advised (by Makow amongst others) that the Women's Lib movement was a pivotal phase in the Zionist destruction of western societies. Women AND men were the dupes. Men were told they had to change, had to accept a less dominant role at home, work, socially, etc. So men grew used to repressing their inherent maleness for fear of giving unintended offence, or of inviting criticism, of being considered 'unacceptable' generally. This created confusion in men; lack of confidence and feelings of shame about who and what they were.

Another tool in the Zionist agenda was to destroy the family unit. Men traditionally were heads of families; were the breadwinners. They gained their sense of identity from this. By promoting Women's Lib and encouraging women to leave the home for work, men no longer felt like the head of anything. Yet every ship needs a captain, and there can only be ONE captain. A family is a ship; one leak and it's disaster.

The family unit was further undermined through drugs, pornography, easily-obtained divorce, credit, consumerism and government dictates that forced parents to surrender their children to dumbed-down education systems that encouraged children to challenge their parents at the same time it forbade parents to discipline their children effectively. Governments imposed their versions of 'sex education' upon children and insist that children recognise same-gender sexuality and marriage, etc. Parents have had to sit back and watch their children being exposed to inordinate emphasis on sexuality: at school, in the media, etc. Parents are 'punished' if they object to what they clearly feel is an unhealthy agenda aimed at their children, by the government for which they pay.
People have been told they 'must not' object to government dictates; 'must not' voice their opinions about issues of race, immigration, education, government decisions, corruption, and a dozen other issues.

People are afraid to open their mouths. They feel their opinions are 'wrong' or punishable. The media reports the punitive actions of governments against those in society who speak out. The media is engaged in a campaign of terror, on behalf of governments. People see black-outfitted monsters, seemingly seven feet tall, their faces hidden behind black visors, their shoulders padded to immense proportions, wearing six inch soles, weilding a variety of terrifying weapons against old age pensions staging a peaceful protest. People are terrified. What if *they* were beaten by these government sanctioned goons, simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time? What would happen to their family if they were incarcerated without charge or evidence?
So, for quite some time now, people have been manipulated by governments who push and pull, push and pull. The message people are being given is brutality simple: keep your mouths shut and do as your told and you might survive what we have in store for you. What we may or may not have in store for you is a secret. However, if you DO dare to open your mouth and voice any objection to this govenment, we can promise you that you will suffer a fate worse than death. Now go to work, shut your mouths, see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing , think nothing, pay your taxes, obey us, believe everything we tell you even though we will vary our tune daily .... and you and your family might make it through until next week. You have no opinon, no rights and probably no future. So shut up and enjoy what little you have today.

No, governments and corporations couldn't have gotten away with this sixty years ago. But sixty years ago, people had just fought the fight of their lives, WW2. They'd survived the ravages of the Great Depression. Then along came the golden years; the 50's and 60's and formica and refrigerators and air-conditioning and new cars and homes and light, romantic Doris Day/Rock Hudson comedies and extended leisure time. Golf and tennis and music lessons were no longer just the province of the wealthy. People grew used to a new, more leisurely, more materialistically enriched lifestyle. They grew used to peace, to governments who handled the big-issues, which resulted in 'more' of the good stuff for much of the population. Gone for most, were the days of not enough food and money. Everything seemed wonderful and getting better by the day. People forgot 'hardship' as their parents had known it. And movies and the new wonders of tv introduced people to 'escapism'; encouraged them to dream often unrealistic ambitions for themselves and their children.
In other words, people lost much of their 'edge'. They grew complacent to a degree. They wanted the fun stuff of life and left government deal with the boring issues. People surrendered their independence in return for what seemed like the good life. And then they took the good life for granted.

Problem is, when you hand responsibility for yourself to someone else, or to a group of others, you need to realise that those others are going to do what's in *their* interests, not yours.
Governments/politicians are NOT the way they're portrayed in all those movies and tv shows. Sure, they have the nice suits and the grey-flecked hair and good teeth. Their voices are often rich and deep and comforting, but so are a lot of radio announcers' voices ... and a lot of those are maniacs. It's not HOW they speak, but what they say that matters. But most important of all is what they neglect to say, which is actually what they secretly MEAN.

TV and movies have manipulated us to accept that if a politician LOOKS nice, then he/she is 'good'. We've come to believe that if a politician went to a 'good' school; if he is handsome, if he lives in an exclusive neighbourhood, if he socialises with celebrities ... then he is someone we should allow to control our lives. Well, Madonna is a celebrity and Tom Cruise has nice teeth and hair ... but would you let them determine your children's fate? Would you allow them to poison your water and food and strip you of employment and your previously nice neighbourhood? Arnold Swartzenegger was dynamic in Terminator and funny as hell in Twins and Kindergarten Cop ...... but does that really qualify him to control the lives of millions? Does it?

At the moment, we're waiting like frightened sheep, hoping the days of Fonzie and Brady Bunch mentality will return. We don't like these wars and unemployment and fear. We want it all to stop. We want to be able to go back to enjoying that sense of childhood we knew even ten years ago. We want someone to step up and fix things so that we can feel better. And according to various so-called 'conspiracy theories', we're exactly where 'they' want us to be, right on schedule. According to the same theories, 'they' will soon introduce the anti-Christ ... who will look exactly the way we've been conditioned to expect our 'leaders' to look: tall, tanned, silver tipped hair, nice suit and teeth and a voice like honey, which will reassure us that all we have to do is follow him and we'll all be able to sit back and relax and enjoy again ........ forever, in hell.
It all comes down, as Bob Dylan said a long time ago, to doing it yourself: ' If you want someone to trust ... trust yourself ' --- ' If you want someone to love -- love yourself' -- ' If you want someone to believe -- believe yourself'.

There will always be one in twenty. But they're having a rough time right now, like the female lawyer they're trying to lock up for 106 years for doing nothing more than exposing corruption in her locality. SHE is one of the ones in twenty. You have a choice: support and defend those Ones in Twenty now, so that they can fix your world up for you. Or sit back on your couch and watch re-runs of Everyone Loves Raymond and let them take those Ones in Twenty away, leaving you and yours helpless and doomed. But people are going to have to make a decision and live with it, because this crap isn't going to go away or get better without a hell of a lot of work and risk.

One of the best bits of advice available at this time, is to do as the ancient Scots did, when they were poised at the edge of a life and death battle. They recited their genealogy, then called to God, saying: 'God --- give me the courage of my ancestors ! ' Doing the same might just be what puts us on the right path and gives us the courage to continue.

Catch up

Ever notice how none of these so called conspiracy debunkers ever tell the world about the fact that we are one big snitching society? I mean many of them will tell us we are controlled, slaves etc, but none of them come right out and tell you this stuff. Makes you wonder? Well it makes me wonder.

Anyways there is still lots of really good information out there, but like I have said previously, I would not really vouch for any of these people, cause it's hard to know who you can really trust. If anyone.

So quick catch up. The world is on it's way, if it's not already there to becoming one big snitching controlled society. Families and friends, coworkers, landlords, strangers are actively spying, snitching, and lying on their fellow citizens. Yeah it's happening.

If you are like I was a year ago, then you also have probably been conditioned from birth to believe that we live in this free none controlled society, when in reality our society is this matrix controlled society. We really do not have the freedom that we think we do. We are slaves, (it doesn't feel like it, because we are totally controlled to think that we are free, and until we learn differently, it's hard to believe anything else.) We get up go to work, church, school, clubs,
amusement parks, read our magazines, hear about controlled countries, and assume that we are free. The opposite is true.

Normally when you think of slaves, you think of whips, chains, and cruelty. Well we are slaves, but not exactly in that way. We are psychological slaves, we are controlled and most of us don't even realise it. We are controlled without physical bonds, and without bars on windows. We are in a psychological prison, and you think, but I am smart, if I was in a prison, I would know it. Yeah same thing I would have said a year ago. I can't make you believe it anymore than someone could have made me believe this a year ago. You have to experience it for yourself. The truth of this will come emotionally, not mentally.

Most of society is either aware, or has some idea about what is going on. Most people just go along with it. It's true. I am not saying they want to, some do, but most just go along with it.

Here are some good videos that might help you with playing catch up. The David Icke videos you will have to go looking for yourself, cause I don't want to get anyone else's accounts closed down. :eyeroll:
The clips from the movie They Live, the movie with Roddie Piper were removed. Also the matrix clip talking about the fact that we are slaves, and the world is this fake thing that has been pulled over our eyes to blind us from the truth.
The matrix clip. I can post the script for. The They Live clip, you really have to see to understand.


The video links are pretty cool, the ones I can link to. The others, you will have to go looking for. David Icke has a lot of interesting things to say. I am not saying I am down with his whole reptilian theory, although stranger things have happened, like this creepy controlled society, but for the time being I would just say, look past that keep an open mind, and pay attention to most of the other stuff he talks about, it's really good stuff. I differ in my views with him, on some very specific stuff, but a lot of what he says is just spot on.

The other clips are from this guy called Marsboy683. He is suppose to be a targeted individual. Either way, the clips are interesting.

The other clips try to explain what the matrix is. I vouch for none of this stuff, and ask you to do your own research. Don't follow leaders, strive to be leaders in your own right. If more people had done this, then when some of the past leaders disappeared, ready and able people would have been there to step up into place.


Matrix script, since the scene was removed from youtube, shortly after the blog posting linking to it, here is the script.


Morpheus : The Matrix is everywhere. It's all around us, even in this
very room. You can see it when you look out your window or
when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you
go to work, when you go to work, when you pay your taxes.
The Matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes,
to blind you from the truth.

Neo : What truth?

Morpheus : That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else, you were born
into bondage, born into a prison that you cannot smell or
taste or touch. A prison...for your mind....Unfortunatly,
no one can be..._told_ what the Matrix is...you have to see
it for yourself.




They live script.

First scene that I think is good. I am not saying it's completely accurate, just relevant enough to try to begin to grasp some stuff.

[quote]

Our impulses are being redirected,


We live in an artificially-induced
state of consciousness,


Goddamn hacker. That's the second
time tonight that asshole has cut in.



The movement began eight months ago
by a group of scientists,



They accidentally discovered
these signals being sent,,,



That thing's giving me a headache.



It must have taken him months
to figure out how to do this.



The under-class is growing,
Human rights are non-existent,



In their repressive society, we
are their unwitting accomplices,



Their intention to rule rests with
the annihilation of consciousness,


We have been lulledinto a trance,
They have made us indifferent,



We are focused
only on our own gain ,,,



They are safe
as long as they are not discovered,



That is their method of survival,
Keep us asleep, Keep us selfiish,



- Keep us sedated,


[/quote]


[quote]The sleeping middle-class
is suddenly becoming poor,



We are their cattle,
We are being bred for slavery,



- Not again.
- We cannot break their signal,



The signal must be shut off
at the source,



- I have a headache.
- Me too, honey.



- What was that all about?
- That idiot's licking his nuts again.



THEY LIVE WE SLEEP
[/quote]



The following scene is one of the best in the movie. He puts on the glasses and the magazine covers, billboard's all show what they are really saying. The pages dissolve into words such as obey, no independent thought, marry and reproduce, the dollar bill says, this is your god. It's a great scene and you really have to see it to understand. It's relevant, because underlying, our world does condition us in very similar ways, and we are equally unaware.


[quote]The warm collection revels
in freedom ofexpression,



OBEY



OBEY



MARRY AND REPRODUCE



NO INDEPENDENT THOUGHT



CONSUME



BUY



OBEY



DO NOT QUESTION AUTHORITY



What's your problem?



What's your problem?



How are you today, sir?



Thank you, sir.



Here you are, sir. Thank you.



Are you going to pay for that?



THIS IS YOUR GOD



I don't want no hassle.
Pay for it or put it back.



Sleep,



Sleep,



Sleep,
[/quote]






Marsboy683

http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=marsboy683


I can't find any fake reasons for them to shut down his channel, so he should be ok. Keeping the fingers crossed. There are about 78 videos, I have not seen them all, but the ones I have are really good. Worth while stuff to watch.

The David Icke stuff, is mostly stuff about him talking about the real nature of physical reality, and also him giving an analogy of how we enslave each other. Eg. One slave tries to escape and the rest all run to block the door to stop the slave from escaping. It's interesting because we saw some of this in the mil gram prison experiment. Within days they had these middle class white males all freaking out, fake cops trying to get some to snitch and spy on each other, and the fake cops trying to get them to simulate sexual acts on each other, when they thought no one was looking, and that was an experiment, where people knew it was an experiment. Even the person conducting the experiment got caught up, and that was in less than one week. However it gives wonderful insight into how a society can become like this in such a short time period.

http://www.prisonexp.org/

[quote]thoroughly confusing all the prisoners. Some of the prisoners who were the ringleaders now thought that the prisoners from the privileged cell must be informers, and suddenly, the prisoners became distrustful of each other. Our ex-convict consultants later informed us that a similar tactic is used by real guards in real prisons to break prisoner alliances. For example, racism is used to pit Blacks, Chicanos, and Anglos against each other. In fact, in a real prison the greatest threat to any prisoner's life comes from fellow prisoners. By dividing and conquering in this way, guards promote aggression among inmates, thereby deflecting it from themselves.[/quote]


See this is classic. Make people distrust each other, then they can't form together to get at the real problem and trust each other enough to form a real rebellion against the true oppressors, cause they are too busy mistrusting, and fighting against each others. Society does this with sexism, racism, religious and political conflicts, when really, we have common goals and should be focusing on the same things.



[quote]The prisoners' rebellion also played an important role in producing greater solidarity among the guards. Now, suddenly, it was no longer just an experiment, no longer a simple simulation. Instead, the guards saw the prisoners as troublemakers who were out to get them, who might really cause them some harm. In response to this threat, the guards began stepping up their control, surveillance, and aggression.

[/quote]


Much like our insane controlled society gone bad. They too have suddenly felt a need to step up their control, surveillance, and aggression.



[quote]
As soon as I realized that #819 could hear the chanting, I raced back to the room where I had left him, and what I found was a boy sobbing uncontrollably while in the background his fellow prisoners were yelling that he was a bad prisoner. No longer was the chanting disorganized and full of fun, as it had been on the first day. Now it was marked by utter conformity and compliance, as if a single voice was saying, "#819 is bad."

I suggested we leave, but he refused. Through his tears, he said he could not leave because the others had labeled him a bad prisoner. Even though he was feeling sick, he wanted to go back and prove he was not a bad prisoner.

At that point I said, "Listen, you are not #819. You are [his name], and my name is Dr. Zimbardo. I am a psychologist, not a prison superintendent, and this is not a real prison. This is just an experiment, and those are students, not prisoners, just like you. Let's go."

He stopped crying suddenly, looked up at me like a small child awakened from a nightmare, and replied, "Okay, let's go." [/quote]


I find this experiment to be fascinating. How free people, even when they know it's an experiment, can be so completely over taken. Much like how the state breaks the will of the people, the experimenters and fake guards in this experiment were able to break the will of these boys, to the extent that they would turn on each other, to the extent that they would treat one of their own this way. Remember this was an experiment where the players had all agreed to take part. Imagine a society where the majority have not agreed to take part.




[quote]Several remarkable things occurred during these parole hearings. First, when we asked prisoners whether they would forfeit the money they had earned up to that time if we were to parole them, most said yes. Then, when we ended the hearings by telling prisoners to go back to their cells while we considered their requests, every prisoner obeyed, even though they could have obtained the same result by simply quitting the experiment. Why did they obey? Because they felt powerless to resist. Their sense of reality had shifted, and they no longer perceived their imprisonment as an experiment. In the psychological prison we had created, only the correctional staff had the power to grant paroles.[/quote]



I never really understood why in a slave society the slaves did not rebel more or over take their oppressors. I now realise that a) First you have to understand that you are a slave, and accept that. b) You also have to realise that a psychological prison is as or more effective than a real prison. It's the minds that these people enslave, the physical is just a sham.


[quote]Prisoners coped with their feelings of frustration and powerlessness in a variety of ways. At first, some prisoners rebelled or fought with the guards. Four prisoners reacted by breaking down emotionally as a way to escape the situation. One prisoner developed a psychosomatic rash over his entire body when he learned that his parole request had been turned down. Others tried to cope by being good prisoners, doing everything the guards wanted them to do. One of them was even nicknamed "Sarge," because he was so military-like in executing all commands.

By the end of the study, the prisoners were disintegrated, both as a group and as individuals. There was no longer any group unity; just a bunch of isolated individuals hanging on, much like prisoners of war or hospitalized mental patients. The guards had won total control of the prison, and they commanded the blind obedience of each prisoner. [/quote]



I think to really understand what is going on with some of our fellew humans in society, you have to really understand the above. I never realised the will of the people could be contained, controlled and broken so easily.



[quote]Prisoner #416 coped by going on a hunger strike to force his release. After several unsuccessful attempts to get #416 to eat, the guards threw him into solitary confinement for three hours, even though their own rules stated that one hour was the limit. Still, #416 refused.

At this point #416 should have been a hero to the other prisoners. But instead, the others saw him as a troublemaker. The head guard then exploited this feeling by giving prisoners a choice. They could have #416 come out of solitary if they were willing to give up their blanket, or they could leave #416 in solitary all night.

What do you think they chose? Most elected to keep their blanket and let their fellow prisoner suffer in solitary all night. (We intervened later and returned #416 to his cell.) [/quote]

This reminds me again of what I was noticing and what David Icke was also saying about prisoners, controlling each other and stopping each other from escape. This prisoner who was fresh to the fight, should have re-energized the other prisoners, but it did not. Instead they now almost view him as an enemy and why? For trying to achieve the same goals they had tried to achieve?

It's like this experiment with monkey's. You put them in a cell. Place a banana, and then spray them each time they try to get the banana. Eventually they stop trying, and start attacking other monkey's who are trying to get the banana, even when you stop spraying them they do the same thing. Even if you take out a couple of monkey's and put in a couple of new ones, they will still attack the new ones, and they don't even understand why, even without the water spraying the monkeys, and then in time the new one's also learn to not go after the banana. It's sounds almost insane, but that is exactly where we are in society. This is the part that I am still trying to grasp.




[quote]At this point it became clear that we had to end the study. We had created an overwhelmingly powerful situation -- a situation in which prisoners were withdrawing and behaving in pathological ways, and in which some of the guards were behaving sadistically. Even the "good" guards felt helpless to intervene, and none of the guards quit while the study was in progress. Indeed, it should be noted that no guard ever came late for his shift, called in sick, left early, or demanded extra pay for overtime work.[/quote]

Ofcourse those in society who are benefiting from this sickness, have no reason for poor health or to be ill affected. While the others who see it for what it is and who are suffering, have all the complaints.



[quote]
I ended the study prematurely for two reasons. First, we had learned through videotapes that the guards were escalating their abuse of prisoners in the middle of the night when they thought no researchers were watching and the experiment was "off." Their boredom had driven them to ever more pornographic and degrading abuse of the prisoners.

Second, Christina Maslach, a recent Stanford Ph.D. brought in to conduct interviews with the guards and prisoners, strongly objected when she saw our prisoners being marched on a toilet run, bags over their heads, legs chained together, hands on each other's shoulders. Filled with outrage, she said, "It's terrible what you are doing to these boys!" Out of 50 or more outsiders who had seen our prison, she was the only one who ever questioned its morality. Once she countered the power of the situation, however, it became clear that the study should be ended. [/quote]


It does not take much to bring out man's inhumanity to man does it? Reminds me of Lord of the Flies. The other interesting part is that of all the outsiders that came and went, the parents, priests and others, none ever demanded that a stop be put to the experiment, it was just this one person who saw what was wrong and questioned it, that helped bring things to an end.


Well not unlike this experiment and McCarthyism, it does not take much to snap society back to reality. Eg. In the prison experiment, someone comes in questions it, and that helps to put an end to the experiment. I think that's when the exterminator begins to snap out of it, and realise that he's become a little too caught up. Same with Mccarthyism. Apparently a news caster Edward R. Murrow, played a big role in getting society to see what a lying, devious, fink the senator was and that helped to break his hold on society. Not before a lot of damage was done, but it helped.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bb4ul_gJ2Hc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_uTbVfDtgI