Gang Stalking

A upto date blog about my adventures with gangstalking. This is my way of sharing with the world what gang stalking is really like. Some helpful books. Gang Stalking Books Mobbing Books

Saturday, September 29, 2007

The Godfather

Now this is a man worth blogging about if ever I saw one. Below is an article on the deceased Markus Wolf, cool name. The former Stasi cheif who ran one of the largest spy networks to ever grace the planet. I should add that before his death there was an article that came out saying that he was employed or asked to work for the United States Government.

The following two articles should shed a lot of light on the mentality behind this former icon.

(He completely looks like one of those CEO's you see on the magazine covers of Forbes or other such mags.)

What I find really interesting is on of his motivations for starting up the Stasi.[quote]The experience was to have a lasting effect on him. In a BBC interview last year he revealed that a dislike of fascism became one of the driving forces in his life, convincing him he had to protect his country from any repetition of the Nazi regime.

[quote]He took great care of his staff, winning their steadfast loyalty. But he also used his warmth to exploit and manipulate others.[/quote]

He seriously could have made a good CEO. There is an article about this kind of person, and how they move up the corporate ladder. I can see why the US government wanted to hire him, he is just the type they look for.

[quote]But Wolf also recruited West Germans - his agents often seducing them with sex or money.
He boasted in his memoirs that if he went down in espionage history, it should be for perfecting the use of sex in spying.[/quote]

Just like how the snitches who spy on us are recruited. Sex money, bribes, blackmail, they are told they are doing something good. :eyeroll:
[quote]Markus Wolf, who died on Thursday, was a legendary Communist spy chief who masterminded some of the most brilliant and diabolical feats of espionage for well over three decades.[/quote]

A man who liked his job and performed it well.

[quote]Born in Germany in 1923, Wolf 's father was an eminent physician and writer who was not only an ardent Communist, but also had Jewish ancestry.
After Hitler came to power in 1933, the Wolf family emigrated to Moscow to escape persecution, and soon the young Markus was studying at an aeronautical college.[/quote]

It's funny, his family fled persecution, and he so desperately wanted to prevent this stuff from happening again that he created the Stasi. I would say it's ironic, and it is, but how many others in history have done the same thing? The more I think about it, I start to see that even if this cold tyrannical empire were defeated tomorrow, another would just rise up and take it's place. Humans are all too willing to lay themselves down and present their neck to be trampled on by others. Just some observances that I have seen throughout history. Still there are those who are happy to not be ruled over, and who do not want regimes of any kind. Those truly have my sympathy, because they are often the ones who are brutalised the most by these dictatorships.

[quote]Although the job was a cover, Wolf reported on the Nuremberg trials.
There, he set eyes on some of the most evil men of the last century and was astonished by how ordinary they appeared.
'Perhaps I was naeve,' he later wrote, 'but I had seen the photograph of all these Nazi leaders, in all their former pomp and glory. Then, in Nuremberg, I saw normal, simple people sitting in the dock.
They seemed like staff in a railway station or in a post office.' The trial left a huge impression on the 22-year-old. In his final report for the radio station, Wolf hoped for a 'time without war, aggression or crimes against humanity' - a wish all too ironic in the light of his later career in the dreaded Stasi.[/quote]

Do you know why? Because even evil dictators had to start someplace. Hitler a failed painter. Many had humble beginnings, and many would still if the right circumstances had not come into play. Many of the worms that stalk and terrorise targets are of such class, or less, but under these fertile grounds, they are slowly being allowed to act out in these ways. We see this all the time in war. Young males, some church going, God fearing. They are at home with their mom's and sisters one day, the next they are in some war torn battle ground raping 7 year old girls, actions they would most likely not openly commit back home, but on the battle grounds with no rules, regulations, or morals to prevent it, you get those situations all too frequently. What changed between saying good bye to their families, and going to another country to being able to devastate and rape another's family? It's all in the what they can get away with. Just like out society currently is condoning, snitches/civilian spies actively torturing innocent people in their homes. Sick and crazy, but that's how it is.

In 1949, Wolf was appointed a member of the East German mission in Moscow, where he acted as the press and cultural attache. It was during this time that he was further groomed to become an intelligence officer.
He was clearly well-suited to the task, because by 1953, at the immensely young age of 30, he was appointed head of the innocuously titled 'German Reconnaissance Administration', which was nothing less than the East German equivalent of the CIA or MI6.
A department of the Stasi, the state apparatus that spied upon and brutally tortured its own people, the GRA quickly came under Wolf's leadership, and was shaped it into perhaps the most ruthless and impressive intelligence gathering organisation the world has ever seen. [/quote]

I will say it one last time. This guy would have made an amazing CEO. He has all the right skill sets.

[quote]Wolf was an idealist, and saw his spies as agents of world peace. 'I tried to instil a different motivation,' he said, 'to give them the security and conviction that they were doing something good, something necessary, something useful.' Nevertheless, like spy masters the world over, Wolf found that agents were more readily recruited when vast sums of money were flashed in front of them. He was also a pioneer of the classic method of the 'honeytrap' to lure well-placed foreigners into the Stasi's clutches.
What distinguished Wolf was that he was not averse to using 'Romeo' agents to woo women informers. The results of this policy were all too often tragic, as Wolf himself was to admit.[/quote]

No different now targets. This is how many of our stalkers see themselves. They are doing something good, they are keeping watch on dangerous individuals. It's giving them a sense of community like nothing else. It's breaking down barriers. That skin head that might not talk to that ethnic minority otherwise, the one handed snitch speak, breaks down all barriers, and suddenly all citizens are created equal, or at least equal enough to be snitches for the state. Then they can go back to hating each other right afterwards.

Oh and don't forget boys and girls, it's not just the Romeo agents out there anymore, no this is an equal opportunity society now, in this day of cheap, free, easy sex, and loose morals, you get many Juliette spies, who are all too willing to give it up to get information, or to recruit that next spy into the fold.

[quote]'There were cases of women whose love was abused, who for a certain time procured important documents or information, not knowing who for, or what service they worked for, and for a variety of reasons, were tried and jailed.' Typically, Wolf would not admit that sometimes the results were even more disastrous.
In the late 1950s, Leonore Heinz, the secretary to a West German foreign ministry official, was seduced by one of Wolf's agents, Heinz S'tterlin.
SO SUCCESSFUL was this honeytrap that the couple got married in 1960, and over the next few years Leonore unwittingly passed on secrets to the East via her spyhusband.
However, the couple were arrested in 1967, and when it was revealed to Leonore that S'tterlin had, in fact, married her on orders, she hanged herself in her cell.
Such an occurrence would have been of little consequence to Wolf, who worked closely with some of the world's most despicable terrorists.[/quote]

How many people out there are married, or in relationships and have no idea that that is why their other half sought them out? As a target I have now seen this enough to be disgusted by it. Remember they know more about you than you might even know about yourself. Those accidental meetings on the street, or as your car breaks down, not so accidental. There are some really great Targeted Individual stories about accidental meetings of targets and love or sexual interests, who later turn out were just there to hurt the target more. It's all too common. The interesting thing is without a society like this, one where the family is broken down, looser morals and values, you could not have as successful a campaign.

Now think about how many people find this out after they have kids, and are themselves eventually asked to take part in the snitching and spying? Some will go along with it, others however might rather not have anything to do with it, and then what do you do with yourself and the children that are the spawn of yourself and that spy that just had to trick you and use you?

As you can see in the above article, some people take it rather badly finding out that their better half is a spy who lied to them for years. Go figure. The heartless creatures behind these networks are so far removed they are not affected and really don't care, what's a little heartbreak for the greater good?

[quote]He was involved with Carlos the Jackal, the PLO, ETA, the IRA, and even the Red Army Faction that murdered its way through West Germany.
The aim was to create panic and fear in the West - and to that end, the terrorists were thoroughly trained by Wolf 's men at clandestine camps in East Germany, where they were taught the skills of an assassin.

In one exercise, a live sheepdog was used as a dummy passenger in a Mercedes and was riddled with bullets before the car was blown up.
As well as abetting terrorists, Wolf's department became astonishingly adept at industrial espionage and thoroughly penetrated IBM.In fact, as Wolf was to admit, the East German electronics firm, Robotron, was 'so heavily dependent on surreptitiously acquiring IBM's technological advances that it was an illegal subsidiary of that company'.[/quote]

Just like any executive, he clearly knew how to command authority, and keep people loyal. The corporate world will miss him.

[quote]However, perhaps Wolf 's greatest success was the agent Günter Guillaume, who was sent to West Germany in 1956 with orders to inveigle himself into the political system.
Guillaume rose through the Social Democratic Party, and by the early 1970s he had become a close aide to the Chancellor Willy Brandt, who was seeking closer ties with the East.
It was an incredible coup the modern-day equivalent of one of Tony Blair's aides reporting to Al Qaeda - 13 although it was not to last.
In the spring of 1973, Guillaume fell under suspicion and was placed under surveillance.

He was arrested a year later and the ensuing scandal, coupled with revelations about the chancellor's penchant for prostitutes, forced Brandt to resign.
Some thought that Wolf had deliberately forced Brandt's downfall, as the Chancellor was becoming too popular spreading the message of democracy in the Communist East.
Wolf denied this, and admitted that the resignation was something of an own goal.
His organisation, he said, 'had unwittingly helped to destroy the career of the most farsighted of modern German statesmen'.[/quote]

No comment.

[quote]In 1986, Wolf finally resigned, stating that he wanted to become an author. However, with the collapse of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the former Stasi chief began to worry for his future security and he sought refuge in Russia. In October 1990 he pleaded to Gorbachev for sanctuary.
'We were your friends,' he wrote. 'We wear a lot of your decorations on our breasts. We were said to have made a great contribution to your security.
Now, in our hour of need, I assume that you will not deny us your help.'
GORBACHEV refused, and after reunification Wolf was arrested, convicted of treason and sentenced to six years in prison. This was overruled by the German Supreme Court, which judged that Wolf had not committed an act of treachery against the country he was living in at the time the old East Germany.[/quote]

After such a successful career, who would not wish to sit back and write their memories. Gorbachev, I have always liked him.

[quote]Nevertheless, he was convicted in 1997 for his involvement in the 1955 kidnapping of a woman who worked for the American mission in Berlin.
The woman had been subjected to severe psychological torture during her kidnapping, and Wolf was given a two-year suspended sentence.[/quote]

Just like any good dictator or CEO, he serves no time for his crimes. Freaking awesome. Crime, corruption, they pay, big time. They seem to be the only thing that does, no wonder so many choose this path. I am finding it harder and harder to blame them or judge them, because the world is just so continually willing to reward them, and their misdeeds. Why would they choose anything else? The world is one big example of this sort continually getting off, for their crimes and misdemeanors.

[quote]For the rest of his life, Wolf appeared on countless television programmes plugging his books - one of them on his favourite hobby, cooking - and never appeared to show any regret for heading one of the most loathsome organisations of the 20th century.[quote]

Truly he missed his calling as the host of who wants to be a Stasi spy cheif. He could have offered the world so much in that capacity. Game show host extraordinaire. It's nice to see that he did not let his celebrity go to his head, and he found time for the finer things. Why shouldn't he, after a 30 year successful career of state oppression. Herding sheepish people, many of who to this day believe that they were doing something for the greater good. Many of them also did not, and will never pay for their crimes. After the fall of the Berlin wall, many of the former Stasi got off scott free, many moved to the West Germany and got good jobs, and rose to the top. The only ones left behind to suffer were the victims of the Stasi, many of them never recovered, proving once again that crime and state oppression does pay.

[quote]In fact, he boasted that he had brought peace to the West. 'When it's recognised that this service contributed to securing and protecting peace in Europe for 45 years, then I can perhaps be proud.' But there was to be one last surprise.[/quote]

Shocking he feels he did the world a service. Below are some of his quotes. I am less and less surprised that men like this get off. The world consistently welcomes this sort. They consistently herald them into power, and then when they get the result of this, can they be surprised?

Markus Wolf Quotes.
[quote]At our college we were taught a universal approach to find out about a person: what problems the person has, what difficulties, what personal tendencies and likings. Markus Wolf
I feel that I, and the people under my command, tried to use all the traditional methods of recruiting agents which were also used by other intelligence services; adopting also means like pressure, money, sex - but that did not characterize my service. Markus Wolf
I tried to instill a different motivation, to give them the security and the conviction that they were doing something good, something necessary, something useful - if you want to use a grandiose expression, that they were doing something for peace. Markus Wolf
Making use of human weaknesses in intelligence work is a logical matter. It keeps coming up, and of course you try to look at all the aspects that interest you in a human being. Markus Wolf
Most of the results of using technical bugging devices were of little importance for my service. It may have been different in counter-intelligence, where bugs in flats, etc., were used to obtain a lot of information about what counter-intelligence was interested in. Markus Wolf
One person can take papers, photograph them without getting excited, return them, and give them away without any scruples; while someone else has to overcome an enormous obstacle. Markus Wolf
The most important thing was that we tried to have a targeted approach - to attack where the side had its secrets, in the centers in Bonn where the major government institutions and the Chancellor were - you will know we were not quite unsuccessful there - and in NATO and NATO countries. Markus Wolf
The particular feature of Berlin - well, all you need to do is look at the map: the geographical position of the city right in the heart of Europe, and the separation of the most powerful two blocs we've ever had in history, which went all the way through Germany. Markus Wolf
There were some tragic cases of women whose love was abused, who for a certain time procured important documents or information, not knowing who for, what service they worked for, and for a variety reasons got jailed, were tried and sentenced. Markus Wolf
We planted bugs, microphones, in premises which interested us in the West. We weren't too successful - I would have said unfortunately in former years, but I don't care anymore now. Markus Wolf
What we wanted from an agent depended on what he brought in. Markus Wolf
You can't do anything if a person says no. In such a case, there's nothing you can do - unlike the popular cliche that pressure is exerted, or that maybe an unwilling source is done away with. Markus Wolf

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, September 17, 2007

Be that guy.

Be that guy.

Really that should say, be that guy or be that girl. Be that person. You know the one that they tell you not to be. When they tell you to quietly sit back and take it. Just because they don’t have the stones, or will, or desire, that’s their choice.

This system works for them, at some level it works for them, or it would not be in place. So be that guy, girl, person. The one that speaks out and says that this is wrong, or I refuse to vote cause you have given me no choice. I refuse to go to the back of the bus because that’s not my place, or refuse to give up my seat cause I have as much right as you do.

Many of the following people that I am going to briefly mention probably had detractors in their lives telling them not to be that person, but you know what, at some point they became that person, and many of the people that I am going to mention below made a difference. Many are famous, to varying degree. You don’t have to be famous, but choice at some point in your life to be that guy, girl, person. It’s one of the few things that has made a difference.

Rose Parks. I was trying to sleep and this woman was on my mind. She was on my mind. What apparently use to happen in the States is that there was this busing policy that kept blacks and whites separated, and apparently if a white person did not have a seat then any black person would be required to give up the seat. (If any of this is incorrect, feel free to correct me.) Anyways, one day after I guess complying with this for some years, she was tired, she was sitting down, and a white person, (some guy) needed a seat, and she just refused. For some reason in that moment, she decided to be that guy, girl, person. She refused. (She had not been the first, but her actions that day made the difference.)

Well the bus was stopped, the cops were called and she was arrested. (I am sure in her life she had people with good intentions, telling her to not be that person and comply, cause just such a fate could happen, or it’s the way things had always been done.) Now instead of acting like good sheeple, her community who were also sick of standing, going to the back of the bus, decided to stage the Montgomery bus boycotts.

The black people of that time decided to not take the bus, until they changed some of the laws. It was not convenient for them, and I am sure it was a hardship, but instead of just sitting back and going, “this is the way it’s always been,” they decided to in that moment do something about it.

(Just like we possibly could.) Anyways, Rosa decided to be that person, and it made a difference.

Joan of ark. Now she was like 14 or something, heard the voice of God, (had visions) and decided to lead the French army to victory. Now I am sure if this girl had parents, they would have shaken their head and told this little peasant girl to not be that person. I mean here she is poor, peasant class, female, no military experience, and this is at a time where France was getting their asses kicked by the English. Military men with years of experience had tried and failed, but this young girl with deep faith, heard the voice of God, presented herself to the King, and lead an army to victory. She decided to be that person.

(Of course for her efforts, the French decided to thank her by letting the English burnt at the stake. Humans seem to do this consistently to their heroes.)

King David. Little more than a boy, decided to go deliver food to his big strong military brothers. The whole army of Israel is afraid of the Philistine army and their giant Goliath. David is disgusted, he says that he will go out and fight. He believes in God and that is all that he needs. They all laugh and the brothers want him to go home, and tend his sheep, cause he’s a Sheppard, but he not deterred. He decides to be that guy in that moment. Now cause every other guy is too scared to do anything, they decide to send him. The armour is heavy, and has not been tested, so he decides to put it off. He has such faith in God. He decides to go and face him man to man.

Now David is described as a pretty youth, and Goliath is described as a Giant, but none the less, he went out to meet him. He said you come to me with a shied and spear, but I come to you in the name of the Lord of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel whom you have defied. The rest if history, he faced him, he took out his sling and stone and killed him, with one fatal blow to the forehead. With not much more than his faith.;&version=31;

Matthew 12: 46-49

Jesus. He had his don’t be that guy moments. I mean there is one scene in the bible where his family, mother and brothers are all like come home with us, the people are saying you are crazy. He didn’t listen to them, he just kept on doing what he was doing. There must have been so many moments of doubt and so many detractors, who thought they knew what was best for the
people, but in his ways he just showed them how to be, how to live better, and how to be free, even when you live in a territory occupied by an army (Romans).

His actions would inspire others, and begin a movement which would change many lives, and save many people. He went through all the doubts, temptations, etc, but overcame then to become that guy.
(For his efforts, he got betrayed and crucified, but that sort of had to happen. Still…),_Jr.

Martin LUther King Jr. Leader of the civil rights movement. I am sure he had moments where he just wanted to not be that guy.

Especially with his government issuing forth a Cointelpro operation against him. Following him 24/7, spreading lies, disinfo, trying to destroy his every achievement at every turn, sending him a suicide note telling him to take his own life, and a lot of other really despicable things. He overcame it and became that guy. His faith in God, the movement, and the rights of the people would make a difference and chance the circumstances for many at that time. Of course a month before his death his Government would target him for termination, because they saw him as a Black Messiah that could electrify the masses.
(A month later he would get assassinated, by some apparent lone gun man. His family doesn’t buy it either.) Still he became that guy.

Ghandi. Oddly enough I don’t know a lot about him. I know he wanted changes, believed in peaceful protests. Started a hunger strike, and a movement that would also change the lives of many. At some point in his life, he also became that guy.
(For his efforts, he would also be assassinated. )

Anyways at some point if there is to be change, someone has to choose to be that guy, that girl, that person. Just because that’s the way it’s always been done, does not mean that is the way it will always be. The resounding theme with many of these people was their faith that a change could be made, and they were not afraid to be that person, no matter what their detractors thought.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, September 15, 2007

Leashing the snitches. Part 2.

It's several hours later and I have managed to annoy and waste the time of the civilian spies/snitches. Not what I had planned, but it made the day more fun. Also I took care of my peeping snitch problem. I guess just like dogs the snitches get bored and it's time to get the leash and take them for a walk, or let them think you are going to.

Anyhoo, sometimes you really do have to fight fire with fire. That's what the stop snitching movement attempted to do. Now when I first got online, I had no idea that the stop snitching movement could even have any relevancy in regards to what was going on with targets. It seemed so far removed, but getting people to stop snitching is as relevant to the Gang stalking/ Targeted Individual movement as it is to other movements.

Apparently what has been happening is for some time now without being aware, our society have been gathering troops of snitches. I mean it seems we have always had snitching to some degree, but now it's societal in many democratic and of course communist countries.

Many ethnic communities were hit first, and I think that is why you get the stop snitching movement having such an urban undertow, but the stop snitching movement is something everyone can look into. Again I am all for people being good citizens, and if you see a real crime do what you have to do, there is a defining line. What I am against is what I see happening now, with snitches getting reduced or no sentences for their crimes because they are willing to lie, or sell out others. I am also against the good for nothing busy bodies, who are just as bad in their own perspective regards. If you are the victim of a crime, or witness one, then do what you have to do. I am all in favor of whistle-blowers, and others along that line.

To find out about both sides of the stop snitching movement you can do some quick research, but this is what it comes down to, the cops are trying to make it look like the stop snitching movement is being backed by criminals who do not have the good of society in mind, this is not fully the case. The stop snitching movement have some very legit concerns about how snitching is affecting their communities.
You have whole entire communities that have been devastated by this, and a criminal justice system where cases are being decided by prosecutors and their snitches. The cops have become very dependent on snitches to help them do their jobs, too dependent, and they are consistently overlooking a lot of the corruption that is happening because of societal snitching.

To find out more about both sides there are some great articles you can check out. These are the ones that are still available.

The only way we can ever all be controlled and enslaved in a future one world government, is if we participate and give our consent. Without the snitches a lot of what is happening now would stop. Our societies however have been scared, cohorsed into thinking that we need to monitor and spy on each other to keep our society safe, this is not fully. People can be good citizens and keep an eye on their socity without being snitches for the state. If anything having an uncontrolled snitching movement is just adding to the corruption in society, rather than preventing it.

Labels: , , , , ,

Leashing the snitches

So it's 6:00 am right I in my apartment minding my own business and one of the low life little snitches has the adacity to come and look into my apartment via the slot. At 6:00 am in the morning. Now the snitch made it onto the elevator before I could catch up to them and let them know what I think.

However I realize just like a leak if you don't get buck with these little creatures, then you
really will have a problem. Now usually I am pretty decent about it, but these creatures need to be sent back to the pit from whence they came. They really need to be leashed and put into line.

I really never realized that there were so many low creatures in the world. People that just don't have enough of their own. However in the last year, I have learned enough about the compliance and stupidity of humanity to fill a book. A small one, because it's the
same over and over again.

So this week I was just reminiscing on some of my electrical burns, I get those from time to time when my shielding fails. I got one this week, and it made me remember my year of electronic harassment and other things.

One fond memory the job that I had in the smaller sized office where I came across another target. (Just one more realisation of how far and wide spread this is.) Anyways the electronic harassment they were doing to us in the workplace, made his eyes twitch and then eventually mine. The thing is the whole office knew what was going on, and they were just so complacent and willing to go along with it, as long as it's not them. I have never met a worst group of people. Not cause I didn't get along with them, because I did, but just knowing that the majority could just watch be aware of this, and do nothing. However that's not a fear assessment, because of of the girls in the office had people constantly calling in and asking her if she was getting ringing in her ears, and she was always nervous and scared. So I know I can't judge. I know that many others are going through the same things, and many in silence. (Silence is the power they use and that they have over this situation, you need to break that silence if you are ever going to make a difference.)

Anyways it's almost laughable to look back on the situation, I mean there you are in an office, where you could cut the creepy happenings with a knife, and no one says anything. I remember trying to have conversations with my eye twitching, while my manager tries to ignore it to the best of his ability, it's all so bizarre.

I remember the other target, he use to make buzzzz, sounds, you know like being electrocuted. It was funny I guess at the time because he knew and I knew, but it's really not funny.

Then I was remembering my introduction to ultra sonic, I would guess bullets? No sure, but from the description on this site, I am guessing that is what it was. now I won't repeat what I said upon that occasion, cause the sensors would go off, but I think it's safe to say, sometimes it's ok to get upset, and say mean, cruel vicious things. Needless to say, it seems to have solved the situation on that occasion, and I was able to let the laughing proclaiming snitch know what I though of him. (Where ever he was, he was esclaiming his pleasure at hitting the target, not the exact words, but close enough. I gave him a few words to write home about.)

Then I am still trying to figure out what was used on me for my introduction to the wonderful world of electronic harassment. Whatever it was it left a burning under the skin, for over two weeks. I still don't know. I do remember a bright blue flash at the window, the first and second time it happened, but not sure what it was. Just some fun memories of the last year.

Realizing that the world is completely corrupt, and that many in society are ok with this trade off cause it allows them to live their little hydonistic lifestyles. I admit I am a little pissed right now, and would love to have 5 minutes with the snitch to let it, know what I think of it.

There are some who are going along with this because they are scared, and just have no idea what to do, but there are others that are power hunger, loathsome little creatures, who get off on this. Who enjoy being cruel to other people, social psychopaths, who have been granted full consent by the democratic governments of the world, to do what they will to their fellow citizens.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, September 13, 2007

False Prophets

David and David.

I was just thinking about two of the David's that I came across during this gang stalking stuff, and the warnings about false sheppards.

I have been blogging about how impressed I was with David Icke recently and some of the stuff that he had to say. I don't agree with all of the stuff, but that's not what caught my eye. In an interview that he did back in 2000, he made the claim that there were several saviours in the past that exactly mirror the life of Jesus. Virgin birth, gifts at birth, angeles, miracles, crucifixin, reserrection, etc.

He slips it in quite nicely. The funny thing about the clip is he talks about people taking things at face value without questioning them. This is what he roughly says...
[The human race has allowed itself to become a human herd of sheep... and until we start questioning and asking a key question about what this guy wants me to believe....]

He also says a lot of really relavent things, then slips this in. Now for the average listener, who has no bible knowlege, it's pretty easy to assume he knows what he is talking about. However this was the first time I was hearing of this and thought I would do some quick research. Seems that someone else had the same idea and has a site about it. Now I still want to do my own research, but some of the names that David Icke mentioned in the interview I am familiar with, and thier lives do not mirror the life of Christ.
The site above goes over the multiple saviors that David Icke lists in his book the biggest secret on page 89. The sites saved me some research, which I still plan to do, but if you know some of your mythology, then you can pick at some of the names quite easily and realise that many of the names had lives that were nothing like the life of Jesus, as described in the bible. However the lie smuggled in with all these other interesting things almost goes unnoticed, and probably has by many.

So again that brought to mind false Prophets/Sheppards, which has been a reoccuring theme lately.
The website above which is a website for ritual abuse survivors talks about false sheppards and the 95% to 5% rule. They will feed you 95% truth and then 5% lies. The lies are so cleaverly slipped in with the truth that you are bound to either not catch them or believe them outright.
The site talks about the common tactics that get used.

1. Perps make themselves experts.

2. They pretend to be under attack.

3. They fight and argue with each other to get the targets confused and to choose sides.

4. They will get real targets to speak on their behalf.

5. They make up crazy stories to make real targets look crazy.6. They try to find out info about targets so they can revictimize them.

There are several other really good points, but this brought to mind the David Lawson, the other David of gang stalking fame, and some of the sites that I first encountered.

When I first learnt about gang stalking, I heard all about David Lawson. He had written this book called terrorist stalking in America, and he had apparently travelled and infiltrated these street level stalking gangs. Apparently David Lawson, gave all the details about how they work, opperate, techniques etc. So ofcourse most targets bought into the bs. Street level vigilante gangs. The book was being sold on a site that teaches you how to steal satalight signal. As mentioned before the US government were notorious back in the 90's for setting up those sites, to catch satalight stealing people. The site has since been changed, and he has re-written the book, this time he is blaming gang stalking on right wing extreamist and anti-government groups.

Now remember David Lawson (Agent Lawson) was to have been this detective, that had over 12 years experience, and he had travelled with these groups for over 5 years or something like that. He also was not available after writing the book so no one could ever ask him questions about it, how convient. He would later reappear in time for the new book, as I predicted he would.

Now I have no proof he's a government agent, he could just be a really bad Private Investigator. He gave 95% truth and the really relavent part, the who is behind it, he sort of threw everyone off about. Targets like me, had to spend months, and my own money to figure it out.

Anyhoo, once I did sort of figure it out, and saw the community for what it was, it was also not hard to realise that most of the groups that had been set up, were full of perps, being run by perps, or just not very effective. I can think of one such group, and you can go back 10 months from now and things will be the exact same as when I first got online. The goal is to make sure that targets never get organised enough, and never really make any true progress. The only time progress will get made is when a real target is about to do so, then they sweep in, and steal the thunder from the real target, so that they can continue to look legit.

This does not only happen in the gang stalking community, it's happening for recovering victims of all sorts. Many of the organisations that people think they can run to for help, were set up, taken over, or highjacked by the very same people we are trying to run from.

Jesus knew about false prophets and that we would be seeing a lot more of them in this time period. Now we always think we are going to be able to spot them right? However they are wolves in sheeps clothing. They come off as sencere, they seem knowledgeable, have a lot of airheaded followers, ok and many genuine ones, they are charismatic, leader like abilities and unless you examine them really closly, you would not know the differece between the real deal, and a false prophet.

Matthew 7:15-20
15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

So that's something to think about. Now I am not saying David Icke is a false phrophet. I can't even proove that David Lawson is an agent or is purposly throwing people off, all I am saying is the 95% to 5% rule should be kept in mind. Even for people that are sincere, if we are given the wrong info by those we trust, we can find ourselves in the same situation. I would also add that a false prophet would come across as really knowledgeable, open, someone you would trust.

So just be on your guard. We live in pretty crazy times to say the least. If you believe the stuff in the bible then at some point in the future, some such leader is going to come along and seem like a savour to those lost, chipped and tagged people of the planet. By that time I am sure they will have wipped out the history of Christ's existance, thrown out enough disinfo, confused enough people, till the people don't know what to think, and will easily fall for who ever comes down the line. It won't even be that hard.

Anyhoo those were just some things that I felt were important to be mindful of.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

What is making us NOT fight back?

I came across this most excellent post, and after following all the requirments below, felt embolded to reprint it. I think it's worth a blog post.

Author: Dock6
Title: What is making us NOT fight back?
posted on 5-4-2006 @ 09:33 AM

Excellent post ! I think many people are asking themselves the same questions as those you've posed.
You're right: sixty years ago this situation could never have evolved. A hundred a sixty years ago, no politician or group of politicians would have dared attempt the repressive control of populations as is now occurring.

But maybe I'm wrong. Pearl Harbour for example --- the radar technicians were stood down, apparently, in order the Japanese could launch their fatal attacks. Did those radar technicians come forward? Not even ONE of them? I don't think we can accept that not one of them, or even six of them, did not examine their conscience and decide they must reveal what they knew.
So how come we only learned about the betrayal that was Pearl Harbour, a few years ago? How come for all those decades, we believed that the Japanese had somehow achieved the impossible by bombing Pearl Harbour? How come we didn't ask ourselves: ' Hey ! How the hell did those Japs get so CLOSE to Pearl without being detected???? What the hell were the radar guys doing .... sleeping? '

But we didn't ask, did we? And no one told us. Instead, we watched all the movies and tv shows and books .... and we bought their story: we suspended our critical faculties and simply accepted what we were told and shown.
How come the media of the day didn't ask: ' Hey! How the hell did it happen? What were the radar guys doing?'. And it's interesting, when you think of it, that not ONE of those radar guys' stories made it into the mainstream media of the day? How come the betrayal of Pearl Harbour was not exposed, way back then?

So, the media has been manipulating us a long time, without our even realising it, back then.
Another factor is the 'one in twenty' theory. Apparently, administrators of jails and POW camps, etc., *find* the one in twenty, and isolate them. The one in twenty is the one who initiates action; who motivates the remaining 19; who acts as natural leader. The one in twenty is smarter, more capable, more independently minded than the other 19. The other 19 can be restrained with minimum effort; they are sheep-like, relatively obdedient; are 'followers'. Get rid of the one in twenty, and your job of controlling the other 19 is easy. Perhaps repressive regimes are actively seeking the 'ones in twenty' within our midst. They might find them at protest rallies; in internet forums; etc. They are the first to be picked off. Perhaps they've *already* been picked off, which might account for all us sheepies, just sitting here in confusion and dismay, waiting for our 'leaders' to come and show us what to do to save ourselves ?
Then there's testosterone. It's what makes men fiesty; willing to take on aggressors and repressors. Knock out the testosterone and men become malleable: peaceable; hesitant; unsure; docile. It's been shown that men can be (and are being?) turned into a form of psuedo-female, via chemicals contained in foods, drinks, food and drink wrappings and containers, etc.
Another means of putting men out of balance and unsure of their role and capabilities, is to kick their confidence around on daily basis. We've been advised (by Makow amongst others) that the Women's Lib movement was a pivotal phase in the Zionist destruction of western societies. Women AND men were the dupes. Men were told they had to change, had to accept a less dominant role at home, work, socially, etc. So men grew used to repressing their inherent maleness for fear of giving unintended offence, or of inviting criticism, of being considered 'unacceptable' generally. This created confusion in men; lack of confidence and feelings of shame about who and what they were.

Another tool in the Zionist agenda was to destroy the family unit. Men traditionally were heads of families; were the breadwinners. They gained their sense of identity from this. By promoting Women's Lib and encouraging women to leave the home for work, men no longer felt like the head of anything. Yet every ship needs a captain, and there can only be ONE captain. A family is a ship; one leak and it's disaster.

The family unit was further undermined through drugs, pornography, easily-obtained divorce, credit, consumerism and government dictates that forced parents to surrender their children to dumbed-down education systems that encouraged children to challenge their parents at the same time it forbade parents to discipline their children effectively. Governments imposed their versions of 'sex education' upon children and insist that children recognise same-gender sexuality and marriage, etc. Parents have had to sit back and watch their children being exposed to inordinate emphasis on sexuality: at school, in the media, etc. Parents are 'punished' if they object to what they clearly feel is an unhealthy agenda aimed at their children, by the government for which they pay.
People have been told they 'must not' object to government dictates; 'must not' voice their opinions about issues of race, immigration, education, government decisions, corruption, and a dozen other issues.

People are afraid to open their mouths. They feel their opinions are 'wrong' or punishable. The media reports the punitive actions of governments against those in society who speak out. The media is engaged in a campaign of terror, on behalf of governments. People see black-outfitted monsters, seemingly seven feet tall, their faces hidden behind black visors, their shoulders padded to immense proportions, wearing six inch soles, weilding a variety of terrifying weapons against old age pensions staging a peaceful protest. People are terrified. What if *they* were beaten by these government sanctioned goons, simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time? What would happen to their family if they were incarcerated without charge or evidence?
So, for quite some time now, people have been manipulated by governments who push and pull, push and pull. The message people are being given is brutality simple: keep your mouths shut and do as your told and you might survive what we have in store for you. What we may or may not have in store for you is a secret. However, if you DO dare to open your mouth and voice any objection to this govenment, we can promise you that you will suffer a fate worse than death. Now go to work, shut your mouths, see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing , think nothing, pay your taxes, obey us, believe everything we tell you even though we will vary our tune daily .... and you and your family might make it through until next week. You have no opinon, no rights and probably no future. So shut up and enjoy what little you have today.

No, governments and corporations couldn't have gotten away with this sixty years ago. But sixty years ago, people had just fought the fight of their lives, WW2. They'd survived the ravages of the Great Depression. Then along came the golden years; the 50's and 60's and formica and refrigerators and air-conditioning and new cars and homes and light, romantic Doris Day/Rock Hudson comedies and extended leisure time. Golf and tennis and music lessons were no longer just the province of the wealthy. People grew used to a new, more leisurely, more materialistically enriched lifestyle. They grew used to peace, to governments who handled the big-issues, which resulted in 'more' of the good stuff for much of the population. Gone for most, were the days of not enough food and money. Everything seemed wonderful and getting better by the day. People forgot 'hardship' as their parents had known it. And movies and the new wonders of tv introduced people to 'escapism'; encouraged them to dream often unrealistic ambitions for themselves and their children.
In other words, people lost much of their 'edge'. They grew complacent to a degree. They wanted the fun stuff of life and left government deal with the boring issues. People surrendered their independence in return for what seemed like the good life. And then they took the good life for granted.

Problem is, when you hand responsibility for yourself to someone else, or to a group of others, you need to realise that those others are going to do what's in *their* interests, not yours.
Governments/politicians are NOT the way they're portrayed in all those movies and tv shows. Sure, they have the nice suits and the grey-flecked hair and good teeth. Their voices are often rich and deep and comforting, but so are a lot of radio announcers' voices ... and a lot of those are maniacs. It's not HOW they speak, but what they say that matters. But most important of all is what they neglect to say, which is actually what they secretly MEAN.

TV and movies have manipulated us to accept that if a politician LOOKS nice, then he/she is 'good'. We've come to believe that if a politician went to a 'good' school; if he is handsome, if he lives in an exclusive neighbourhood, if he socialises with celebrities ... then he is someone we should allow to control our lives. Well, Madonna is a celebrity and Tom Cruise has nice teeth and hair ... but would you let them determine your children's fate? Would you allow them to poison your water and food and strip you of employment and your previously nice neighbourhood? Arnold Swartzenegger was dynamic in Terminator and funny as hell in Twins and Kindergarten Cop ...... but does that really qualify him to control the lives of millions? Does it?

At the moment, we're waiting like frightened sheep, hoping the days of Fonzie and Brady Bunch mentality will return. We don't like these wars and unemployment and fear. We want it all to stop. We want to be able to go back to enjoying that sense of childhood we knew even ten years ago. We want someone to step up and fix things so that we can feel better. And according to various so-called 'conspiracy theories', we're exactly where 'they' want us to be, right on schedule. According to the same theories, 'they' will soon introduce the anti-Christ ... who will look exactly the way we've been conditioned to expect our 'leaders' to look: tall, tanned, silver tipped hair, nice suit and teeth and a voice like honey, which will reassure us that all we have to do is follow him and we'll all be able to sit back and relax and enjoy again ........ forever, in hell.
It all comes down, as Bob Dylan said a long time ago, to doing it yourself: ' If you want someone to trust ... trust yourself ' --- ' If you want someone to love -- love yourself' -- ' If you want someone to believe -- believe yourself'.

There will always be one in twenty. But they're having a rough time right now, like the female lawyer they're trying to lock up for 106 years for doing nothing more than exposing corruption in her locality. SHE is one of the ones in twenty. You have a choice: support and defend those Ones in Twenty now, so that they can fix your world up for you. Or sit back on your couch and watch re-runs of Everyone Loves Raymond and let them take those Ones in Twenty away, leaving you and yours helpless and doomed. But people are going to have to make a decision and live with it, because this crap isn't going to go away or get better without a hell of a lot of work and risk.

One of the best bits of advice available at this time, is to do as the ancient Scots did, when they were poised at the edge of a life and death battle. They recited their genealogy, then called to God, saying: 'God --- give me the courage of my ancestors ! ' Doing the same might just be what puts us on the right path and gives us the courage to continue.

Labels: , , ,

Monkeys, Frogs, State Control.

David Icke Secrets of the Matrix. (This is great) I found it so informative. Now you don't have to agree 100% with it, but it's pretty informative.

It's six hours. I have seen about 3 hrs worth, but it's good what I have seen. You can rent it, buy it or find it other ways. Google had it but removed it, but if you look about...

Anyways this is how the world seems to be working.
I think this was an actual experiment that was done, but I could not find the source.

Start with a cage containing five monkeys. Inside the cage, hang a banana over a set of stairs. Before long, a monkey will go to the stairs and climb towards the banana. As soon as he touches the stairs, spray all of the other monkeys with cold water. After while, another monkey makes an attempt with the same result – the other monkeys are sprayed with cold water. Pretty soon, when any monkey tries to climb the stairs, the other monkeys will try to prevent it. Now, put away the cold water. Remove one monkey from the cage and replace it with a new one. The new monkey sees the banana and wants to climb the stairs. To his surprise, all of the other monkeys attack him. After another attempt and attack, he knows that if he tries to climb the stairs, he’ll be assaulted. Next, remove another of the original five monkeys and replace it with a new one.

The newcomer goes to the stairs and is attacked. The previous newcomer takes part in the punishment with enthusiasm! Likewise, replace a third original monkey with a new one, then a fourth, then the fifth. Every time the newest monkey takes to the stairs, he is attacked. Most of the monkeys that are beating him have no idea why they weren’t permitted to climb the stairs or why they’re participating in the beating of the newest monkey. After replacing all the original monkeys, none of the remaining monkeys have ever been sprayed with cold water. Nevertheless, no monkey ever again approaches the stairs to try for the banana.

Now take this a step further and apply this to society. At some point these mokeys/people go out into the world, they go into the companies, into the schools, religious organizations, etc. Social constructs that are used to keep us in line, and teach us how to fall in line. Everytime a monkey/person get's out of line they are punished. Some monkeys/people go through life never going after the banana, never getting out of line, and so are never attacked, and so would never understand that society is like this. Then you get those who do go for the banana, whistle-blowers, activists, dissidents, those who step out of line, those who ask the right/wrong questions, publish the news stories they should not, ones that are too independent, those who do not properly conform, etc. Then they see society for what it is.

Society has various ways for dealing with those who are not conforming, or teaching others how to conform. Drugging of young school children who are too hyperactive for their own good, School bullying, workplace mobbing, community gang stalking, the buzzsaw for reporters, religious/cult harassment, social annexing, etc. Most of society at some point will learn how to fall in line, and they too will keep others in line. Many don't know why, but that's the way it is, and they understand that they can get sprayed with that cold water if they don't keep others in line.

People are kept in line primarily via fear, fear of what others will think of them, or react to them, etc. Social constructs that most of us are a part of and would not wish to be annexed from. Should a monkey/person step out of line, they are then socially annexed to bring them back in line, harassed, have their lives disrupted, or more forceful means. Now we have more overt and extreme measures. Neurolinguist programing is being used to purposly sensitive people in society to everyday stimuli, then on others electronic monitoring and torture is being used.

[quote]If you put a frog in scalding hot water, the frog will jump out immediately. If you put that same frog into lukewarm water and gradually turn up the heat, the frog will happily let itself be boiled to death." [/quote]

The same is happening with our move towards a one world global government, with a scanned/micro chipped/controlled, communist, snitching society. I mean if someone tried to introduce ID chips into the bodies of humans 50 years ago, people would have revolted, and overthrown the state. Same with the satalight surveillance, and the CCTV cameras, but we have slowly over time introduced the agenda for a global state and the frogs/humans are going to slowly let themselves get cooked to death/compliance.

As long as you just do it gradually and keep them distracted, they will be boiled before they know it. You could never do this all at once, because like the hot water they would realize it and rebel, but slowly over time, they get comfortable, slowly sedated like the frog, till it's too late.

These blog posts are looping, but if you are like me, then coming to grips on how society could be like this is a process.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, September 08, 2007

Blue Wall

May The Blue Wall Fall.

It's a simple prayer. It's meant to break the silence that is currently being used to oppress innocent people. It is a prayer against the corruption that has creep in and now controls these places of law enforcement. The blue wall is protective shied, but it is also an oppressive barrier, that is used to deny justice to millions worldwide. This meditation is against that oppressive barrier.

May The Blue Wall Fall.

It's not a prayer for harm for the individuals, but it is a prayer to end the corruption that has gone on for too long, the silent strangle hold that prevents those that would do their jobs fairly and justly, and those who would seek truth and justice from a system that has become self serving and oppressive.

May The Blue Wall Fall.

Like other systems and walls of oppression before it. May it crumble like the Berlin wall, who for years kept people enslaved behind a wall of surveillance, and state oppression.

May it fall like the system of apartheid that had for too long enslaved and oppressed a people, and a society.

May the blue wall fall like the walls of the red seas that let the innocent pass through, and fell to stop the corrupt from further oppression of the innocent.

May the blue wall fall like the walls of Jericho, with trumpets and a mighty shout, the walls fell crumpled and were no more.

May the blue wall fall like all other corrupt systems of oppression that have gone before it, and that will come after it.

It's a prayer for justice, an end to corruption, and a restoration of decency which is missing from our corrupt society.

May the blue wall fall in all it's oppressive glory. May it no longer oppress the innocent, or rob the poor and oppressed of justice. May it crumble from within and from without, till justice is restored once more.

May The Blue Wall Fall. It's simple words, but the hope is powerful indeed. I hope that those who seek justice, and freedom from oppression will join in with this meditation, with this simple prayer. It's a hope that right will be restored, and that injustice will no longer prevail against the innocent and the righteous.

May The Blue Wall fall, and corruptions reign be ended once and for all. May the just be allowed to do their jobs in due coarse, and may this oppressive, corrupt wall of silence no longer stand in the way of those who would seek justice, or those who would deliver justice.

This is a prayer and a meditation that can be performed, by all who seek an end to tyranny and injustice. It does not call for the harm of the innocent, or for anyone in fact, it just seeks to end a system of oppression and corruption that has now gone on too long, and one that has become the ruling norm throughout many of our societies. May the just be allowed to perform justice, without fair of reprisals or punishment, without fair of being ostracized, and annexed.

May The Blue Wall Fall.

I would ask all people of conscience, good morals, those who seek justice, freedom from oppression, to meditate on these simple words, and hopefully one day we will once again have a system that is free from corruption, and if not free from corruption, then at least it will not be the norm in society anymore.

May The Blue Wall Simply Fall, crumple to dust, oppress and silence no more.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Friday, September 07, 2007

Catch up

Ever notice how none of these so called conspiracy debunkers ever tell the world about the fact that we are one big snitching society? I mean many of them will tell us we are controlled, slaves etc, but none of them come right out and tell you this stuff. Makes you wonder? Well it makes me wonder.

Anyways there is still lots of really good information out there, but like I have said previously, I would not really vouch for any of these people, cause it's hard to know who you can really trust. If anyone.

So quick catch up. The world is on it's way, if it's not already there to becoming one big snitching controlled society. Families and friends, coworkers, landlords, strangers are actively spying, snitching, and lying on their fellow citizens. Yeah it's happening.

If you are like I was a year ago, then you also have probably been conditioned from birth to believe that we live in this free none controlled society, when in reality our society is this matrix controlled society. We really do not have the freedom that we think we do. We are slaves, (it doesn't feel like it, because we are totally controlled to think that we are free, and until we learn differently, it's hard to believe anything else.) We get up go to work, church, school, clubs,
amusement parks, read our magazines, hear about controlled countries, and assume that we are free. The opposite is true.

Normally when you think of slaves, you think of whips, chains, and cruelty. Well we are slaves, but not exactly in that way. We are psychological slaves, we are controlled and most of us don't even realise it. We are controlled without physical bonds, and without bars on windows. We are in a psychological prison, and you think, but I am smart, if I was in a prison, I would know it. Yeah same thing I would have said a year ago. I can't make you believe it anymore than someone could have made me believe this a year ago. You have to experience it for yourself. The truth of this will come emotionally, not mentally.

Most of society is either aware, or has some idea about what is going on. Most people just go along with it. It's true. I am not saying they want to, some do, but most just go along with it.

Here are some good videos that might help you with playing catch up. The David Icke videos you will have to go looking for yourself, cause I don't want to get anyone else's accounts closed down. :eyeroll:
The clips from the movie They Live, the movie with Roddie Piper were removed. Also the matrix clip talking about the fact that we are slaves, and the world is this fake thing that has been pulled over our eyes to blind us from the truth.
The matrix clip. I can post the script for. The They Live clip, you really have to see to understand.

The video links are pretty cool, the ones I can link to. The others, you will have to go looking for. David Icke has a lot of interesting things to say. I am not saying I am down with his whole reptilian theory, although stranger things have happened, like this creepy controlled society, but for the time being I would just say, look past that keep an open mind, and pay attention to most of the other stuff he talks about, it's really good stuff. I differ in my views with him, on some very specific stuff, but a lot of what he says is just spot on.

The other clips are from this guy called Marsboy683. He is suppose to be a targeted individual. Either way, the clips are interesting.

The other clips try to explain what the matrix is. I vouch for none of this stuff, and ask you to do your own research. Don't follow leaders, strive to be leaders in your own right. If more people had done this, then when some of the past leaders disappeared, ready and able people would have been there to step up into place.

Matrix script, since the scene was removed from youtube, shortly after the blog posting linking to it, here is the script.

Morpheus : The Matrix is everywhere. It's all around us, even in this
very room. You can see it when you look out your window or
when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you
go to work, when you go to work, when you pay your taxes.
The Matrix is the world that has been pulled over your eyes,
to blind you from the truth.

Neo : What truth?

Morpheus : That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else, you were born
into bondage, born into a prison that you cannot smell or
taste or touch. A prison...for your mind....Unfortunatly,
no one can be..._told_ what the Matrix have to see
it for yourself.

They live script.

First scene that I think is good. I am not saying it's completely accurate, just relevant enough to try to begin to grasp some stuff.


Our impulses are being redirected,

We live in an artificially-induced
state of consciousness,

Goddamn hacker. That's the second
time tonight that asshole has cut in.

The movement began eight months ago
by a group of scientists,

They accidentally discovered
these signals being sent,,,

That thing's giving me a headache.

It must have taken him months
to figure out how to do this.

The under-class is growing,
Human rights are non-existent,

In their repressive society, we
are their unwitting accomplices,

Their intention to rule rests with
the annihilation of consciousness,

We have been lulledinto a trance,
They have made us indifferent,

We are focused
only on our own gain ,,,

They are safe
as long as they are not discovered,

That is their method of survival,
Keep us asleep, Keep us selfiish,

- Keep us sedated,


[quote]The sleeping middle-class
is suddenly becoming poor,

We are their cattle,
We are being bred for slavery,

- Not again.
- We cannot break their signal,

The signal must be shut off
at the source,

- I have a headache.
- Me too, honey.

- What was that all about?
- That idiot's licking his nuts again.


The following scene is one of the best in the movie. He puts on the glasses and the magazine covers, billboard's all show what they are really saying. The pages dissolve into words such as obey, no independent thought, marry and reproduce, the dollar bill says, this is your god. It's a great scene and you really have to see it to understand. It's relevant, because underlying, our world does condition us in very similar ways, and we are equally unaware.

[quote]The warm collection revels
in freedom ofexpression,









What's your problem?

What's your problem?

How are you today, sir?

Thank you, sir.

Here you are, sir. Thank you.

Are you going to pay for that?


I don't want no hassle.
Pay for it or put it back.





I can't find any fake reasons for them to shut down his channel, so he should be ok. Keeping the fingers crossed. There are about 78 videos, I have not seen them all, but the ones I have are really good. Worth while stuff to watch.

The David Icke stuff, is mostly stuff about him talking about the real nature of physical reality, and also him giving an analogy of how we enslave each other. Eg. One slave tries to escape and the rest all run to block the door to stop the slave from escaping. It's interesting because we saw some of this in the mil gram prison experiment. Within days they had these middle class white males all freaking out, fake cops trying to get some to snitch and spy on each other, and the fake cops trying to get them to simulate sexual acts on each other, when they thought no one was looking, and that was an experiment, where people knew it was an experiment. Even the person conducting the experiment got caught up, and that was in less than one week. However it gives wonderful insight into how a society can become like this in such a short time period.

[quote]thoroughly confusing all the prisoners. Some of the prisoners who were the ringleaders now thought that the prisoners from the privileged cell must be informers, and suddenly, the prisoners became distrustful of each other. Our ex-convict consultants later informed us that a similar tactic is used by real guards in real prisons to break prisoner alliances. For example, racism is used to pit Blacks, Chicanos, and Anglos against each other. In fact, in a real prison the greatest threat to any prisoner's life comes from fellow prisoners. By dividing and conquering in this way, guards promote aggression among inmates, thereby deflecting it from themselves.[/quote]

See this is classic. Make people distrust each other, then they can't form together to get at the real problem and trust each other enough to form a real rebellion against the true oppressors, cause they are too busy mistrusting, and fighting against each others. Society does this with sexism, racism, religious and political conflicts, when really, we have common goals and should be focusing on the same things.

[quote]The prisoners' rebellion also played an important role in producing greater solidarity among the guards. Now, suddenly, it was no longer just an experiment, no longer a simple simulation. Instead, the guards saw the prisoners as troublemakers who were out to get them, who might really cause them some harm. In response to this threat, the guards began stepping up their control, surveillance, and aggression.


Much like our insane controlled society gone bad. They too have suddenly felt a need to step up their control, surveillance, and aggression.

As soon as I realized that #819 could hear the chanting, I raced back to the room where I had left him, and what I found was a boy sobbing uncontrollably while in the background his fellow prisoners were yelling that he was a bad prisoner. No longer was the chanting disorganized and full of fun, as it had been on the first day. Now it was marked by utter conformity and compliance, as if a single voice was saying, "#819 is bad."

I suggested we leave, but he refused. Through his tears, he said he could not leave because the others had labeled him a bad prisoner. Even though he was feeling sick, he wanted to go back and prove he was not a bad prisoner.

At that point I said, "Listen, you are not #819. You are [his name], and my name is Dr. Zimbardo. I am a psychologist, not a prison superintendent, and this is not a real prison. This is just an experiment, and those are students, not prisoners, just like you. Let's go."

He stopped crying suddenly, looked up at me like a small child awakened from a nightmare, and replied, "Okay, let's go." [/quote]

I find this experiment to be fascinating. How free people, even when they know it's an experiment, can be so completely over taken. Much like how the state breaks the will of the people, the experimenters and fake guards in this experiment were able to break the will of these boys, to the extent that they would turn on each other, to the extent that they would treat one of their own this way. Remember this was an experiment where the players had all agreed to take part. Imagine a society where the majority have not agreed to take part.

[quote]Several remarkable things occurred during these parole hearings. First, when we asked prisoners whether they would forfeit the money they had earned up to that time if we were to parole them, most said yes. Then, when we ended the hearings by telling prisoners to go back to their cells while we considered their requests, every prisoner obeyed, even though they could have obtained the same result by simply quitting the experiment. Why did they obey? Because they felt powerless to resist. Their sense of reality had shifted, and they no longer perceived their imprisonment as an experiment. In the psychological prison we had created, only the correctional staff had the power to grant paroles.[/quote]

I never really understood why in a slave society the slaves did not rebel more or over take their oppressors. I now realise that a) First you have to understand that you are a slave, and accept that. b) You also have to realise that a psychological prison is as or more effective than a real prison. It's the minds that these people enslave, the physical is just a sham.

[quote]Prisoners coped with their feelings of frustration and powerlessness in a variety of ways. At first, some prisoners rebelled or fought with the guards. Four prisoners reacted by breaking down emotionally as a way to escape the situation. One prisoner developed a psychosomatic rash over his entire body when he learned that his parole request had been turned down. Others tried to cope by being good prisoners, doing everything the guards wanted them to do. One of them was even nicknamed "Sarge," because he was so military-like in executing all commands.

By the end of the study, the prisoners were disintegrated, both as a group and as individuals. There was no longer any group unity; just a bunch of isolated individuals hanging on, much like prisoners of war or hospitalized mental patients. The guards had won total control of the prison, and they commanded the blind obedience of each prisoner. [/quote]

I think to really understand what is going on with some of our fellew humans in society, you have to really understand the above. I never realised the will of the people could be contained, controlled and broken so easily.

[quote]Prisoner #416 coped by going on a hunger strike to force his release. After several unsuccessful attempts to get #416 to eat, the guards threw him into solitary confinement for three hours, even though their own rules stated that one hour was the limit. Still, #416 refused.

At this point #416 should have been a hero to the other prisoners. But instead, the others saw him as a troublemaker. The head guard then exploited this feeling by giving prisoners a choice. They could have #416 come out of solitary if they were willing to give up their blanket, or they could leave #416 in solitary all night.

What do you think they chose? Most elected to keep their blanket and let their fellow prisoner suffer in solitary all night. (We intervened later and returned #416 to his cell.) [/quote]

This reminds me again of what I was noticing and what David Icke was also saying about prisoners, controlling each other and stopping each other from escape. This prisoner who was fresh to the fight, should have re-energized the other prisoners, but it did not. Instead they now almost view him as an enemy and why? For trying to achieve the same goals they had tried to achieve?

It's like this experiment with monkey's. You put them in a cell. Place a banana, and then spray them each time they try to get the banana. Eventually they stop trying, and start attacking other monkey's who are trying to get the banana, even when you stop spraying them they do the same thing. Even if you take out a couple of monkey's and put in a couple of new ones, they will still attack the new ones, and they don't even understand why, even without the water spraying the monkeys, and then in time the new one's also learn to not go after the banana. It's sounds almost insane, but that is exactly where we are in society. This is the part that I am still trying to grasp.

[quote]At this point it became clear that we had to end the study. We had created an overwhelmingly powerful situation -- a situation in which prisoners were withdrawing and behaving in pathological ways, and in which some of the guards were behaving sadistically. Even the "good" guards felt helpless to intervene, and none of the guards quit while the study was in progress. Indeed, it should be noted that no guard ever came late for his shift, called in sick, left early, or demanded extra pay for overtime work.[/quote]

Ofcourse those in society who are benefiting from this sickness, have no reason for poor health or to be ill affected. While the others who see it for what it is and who are suffering, have all the complaints.

I ended the study prematurely for two reasons. First, we had learned through videotapes that the guards were escalating their abuse of prisoners in the middle of the night when they thought no researchers were watching and the experiment was "off." Their boredom had driven them to ever more pornographic and degrading abuse of the prisoners.

Second, Christina Maslach, a recent Stanford Ph.D. brought in to conduct interviews with the guards and prisoners, strongly objected when she saw our prisoners being marched on a toilet run, bags over their heads, legs chained together, hands on each other's shoulders. Filled with outrage, she said, "It's terrible what you are doing to these boys!" Out of 50 or more outsiders who had seen our prison, she was the only one who ever questioned its morality. Once she countered the power of the situation, however, it became clear that the study should be ended. [/quote]

It does not take much to bring out man's inhumanity to man does it? Reminds me of Lord of the Flies. The other interesting part is that of all the outsiders that came and went, the parents, priests and others, none ever demanded that a stop be put to the experiment, it was just this one person who saw what was wrong and questioned it, that helped bring things to an end.

Well not unlike this experiment and McCarthyism, it does not take much to snap society back to reality. Eg. In the prison experiment, someone comes in questions it, and that helps to put an end to the experiment. I think that's when the exterminator begins to snap out of it, and realise that he's become a little too caught up. Same with Mccarthyism. Apparently a news caster Edward R. Murrow, played a big role in getting society to see what a lying, devious, fink the senator was and that helped to break his hold on society. Not before a lot of damage was done, but it helped.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, September 03, 2007


Refuting the text of Judas and the de vinci code, as false.

Does anyone actually still read the bible? I woke up today with the surest conviction, that the de vinci code and the Judas text were false and should be refuted as such. I have never given either any credence previously, to require refuting, but today I felt it was required. Apparently some may have been confused or deceived by one or both.

1. The Judas text, let's just think it through. If he was so asked by Jesus to betray him as the text apparently claims, then why would he still need 30 pieces of silver to do it? I mean if he was fulfilling a divine request, then much like other that had gone before, he probably would not need 30 pieces of silver to do this.

Also at the end of this, if Jesus was asking him to betray him, then Judas would have known the exact outcome of his actions, he would have known his betrayal would lead to the ultimate death of Jesus. It seems when he realised they were going to kill Jesus is when he went back and tried to return the pieces of silver. Being unable to live with the consequences of his actions he killed himself.

So just think about it logically. If you knew your purpose was to betray a man, unto his death, would you need the 30 pieces of silver to inspire your divine mission? Then let's say your divine mission is to get someone killed, you accomplish the mission, why then do an about face? Cause you feel guilty? Then Judas tries to return the blood money, and then goes and kills himself, cause he felt bad? If this is what he was asked to do why would you then go back and question it? Or even try to return the silver that he had accepted to betray Jesus in the first place?

2. A work of fiction. With claims that Jesus was married, survived crucifixion, and had a child and was in no way divine?

The goal being to eventually tie in Jesus with some modern day bloodline.

I have come across nothing in the reading of the word that gives any credence to any of these assertions, therefore I do refute them as false.

What I have come across is a resurrected Jesus who visits the disciples and others, who attest to the crucifixion wounds in his hands and feet. I think a resurrection seems a pretty divine event.

The rest though it would change very little, is never mentioned or asserted to. Mary M. does seem to follow him around, and after his death she is one of the first to see him, and addresses him as teacher, but nothing more and nothing less.

Seems like this is one more disinfo. The goal seems to be to remove Jesus from the picture. His works, life, history and his eventual existence if they have the chance to. Once that is done, what will be left? It will be a free passage to over take humanity.

In every time period when people have gone through adverse times they have had their faith, belief in God, a higher power, and hope in things to come. If you attack the source, the foundation of that, and strip that from people's minds, and their belief systems, then they will have no weapon, no power against evil, and is that not the eventual goal?

Labels: , , , ,