Facebook friend or foe?

Facebook.

CIA government database opperation?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpLNlSKugHw

What if I said to you, fill out this survey for me. It will have information such as
-Resume
-former jobs
-places you have been
-books you have read
-all your friends
-family
-lovers
-associates
-old schools
-old companies
-who you associate with now
-group affiliations
-religious

It will also have any other personal details that you want to provide.

I am not only going to use this information to profile you, but to help me in profiling those around you. I will use the information to advertise to you, to help you find groups and other people that might be of interest to you, but I will also use it for other purposes, would you say yes?
What if I told you that this information would some day be used to find you, and anyone associated with you, should you speak out against the government?

What If I told you this information would be used to find you should you commit a crime, or just be accused of one, guilty or not.

What if I told you this info would be used to find you, should you ever flee the country, or try to go underground?

Don't believe it, think again, Facebook is so much more than you expected.

Let's say something happens and you have to go on the run, who is going to help you? It's not usually going to be strangers, we are all commented. By giving out who you went to high school, middle school, university with, you have cut off that circle. By giving out the groups you are associated with, you have cut off that circle. By giving out the places you have been, you have cut off that circle. Library records, now they have a way to look for you based on reading habits. Etc.
You are boxing yourself into a corner and don't even know it. If the day ever comes when something does happen, you blog something someone does not like, you make a comment, you have to pack and leave for any reason, no one will be able to help you, because the information is out there.

The pictures you share, all those biometrically recognisable faces. Everything you put out there is shared, and once the information is out there, it is not getting erased. Once it's on the net, expect it to be there forever.

I don't use facebook, but I know others who do. I have heard a couple of fun stories. When people commit crimes or are accused of crimes, wanted for questioning, etc, one of the first things cops do is go to facebook. They find out who people's friends are, their families, connections are, where they have been, group affiliations etc.

I also had one person who does not use facebook anymore tell me, that when they were on the site, they had a pop up message, I don't know what it's called, but apparently you have lists of friends, and they have friends, well the pop up said, based on your list, you might know this person and might want to add them to your friendship list. The person in question who got the pop up, did know the person and it scared this person enough to get them off facebook. They are cross checking and scanning information. Seeing who knows who, who had what affiliations, who went to school with who, who is connected. Connections that you might not even think about, yet they knew.

I am not saying this can only be used for criminals, but I am saying if you value your privacy and the time ever comes when you have to hide, get out of the country, or disagree with the government, are accused of a crime even falsely, you have no place to hide. They know who is a friend of a friend of a friend, who is associated with this group, who went to this place, that, in their past, if you are on the run, where you are likely to go, and who you are likely to connect with, and who those people are connected with.

People nowadays are different than people of the past. Technology can help us, but look at the type of society that we are in. We are coming up on a surveillance society, and because of that, it might be a good idea, to not provide the government database with all your information. Information that you would be peeved off at to realise that others had, if they got it in some
other way, but information that you are all too willing to freely give and share.

Use facebook if you want, but just be aware of what you are giving out. It's not a matter of being I have done nothing wrong, I have nothing to worry about, the time will come where that will not matter. Becareful about what you are putting out there.

Also keep in mind that this information is being aggregated with other lists and other bits of information to paint a very detailed picture of you.

Don't get me wrong, facebook from what I have heard is a great way to get together groups, etc, but if those groups are all being put together on a government controlled website, is that a good idea for your specific group? Would you go to FBI, or CIA head quarters and hold your meetings there? If so then you have nothing to worry about, or think about.

Yes they also keep trying to get me to use facebook, and I always give the same response.

Down with snitching clearified.

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/06/24/down-with-the-snitching/

I blogged the above post really early in the morning and so not a good time for blogging, so I thought I would go over it, I made a lot of points and i want to make sure I did it correctly.

Construction projects.

Many targets complain about these, and in my personal experience, they use these projects as an excuse to help with the monitoring and surveillance of the area.

Sure there is always construction ongoing so how can we be sure it's directed at us. I have lived several years on the planet, and there has often been construction ongoing, but never like this.
It's not just construction at the last two locations that lasted for months or years on end, it's going to interviews, and by the time you get out a little construction, or drilling in the street you are going to pass just springs up. It's happened a few times, coincidence? A few times too many.
It happens for me and most other targets I know. As we are able to compare notes, this is a frequent theme that comes up, and they also see a pattern of extraordinary construction that has gone out of bounds.

Companies closing or change of owners.

This is another thing that I have noticed. Changes of owners. Let's say you had a store where the family were not going along with the snitching, suddenly they are out of business, or the store ownership changes. The things that I have further noticed is that within this change, specific products that were available, that the store specialized in are not there. Which makes no sense.
Targets complain about stores being out of products they use when they get there, even if they go to other locations, the products are out of stock.

This sounds crazy at first, but it's not. They watch and record everything that we buy. There is always someone behind us in the line, to mentally record the products the target purchased. They also watch what we take off the shelf, so they know if our diets change. They know which products to be out of, or if they can stop ordering all together.

In comparing notes amongst several targets, this is a pattern that they have also recorded and noted.

In the DT Stockton report he also documents the means that they use to put companies out of business. I don't know if the document is authentic, but much of what it says, sounds valid.
In my own experience, what I have seen with my customers is them being paid off or ordered this that or the other for not working with me. Eg. Trying to get my customers to leave from working with me. The ones that have stayed have recorded Gang Stalking patterns in their own lives. Based on some of what I hear back about what is happening this seems to be the case. Either go along with the system or be bowled over by it. This was the same with the Stasi, refuse to spy, have your life messed with.

Fired

I spoke of a group that had messed with my phones and performed other petty events that made me choose to change location and disassociate with them, while still in the work placed. They also got me written up. This is correct and first hand experience.

Getting me fired. I had heard from a third party, not related or associated with the story that person B) had been the cause. Since the third party would have no reason to lie, they were either correct, or if mistaken then it was not intentional, but this is what I heard back.

I did not mean to imply that person A) had requested for person B) to take such actions. What I meant to imply was that because of the association, person B) was inclined to take such actions.
Eg. I once had another, unrelated situation, where a friend come up and told me that person B) who was also friend with my friend, person A), that person B) hated me. I was really surprised, and I was like what? Why? Apparently because of my friendship with person A) for no other reason. My friend said person B) was really jealous of the the friendship and just hated my guts, and to watch my back. Other things were said, but you get the idea. So it's not to indicate that person A) made person B) take action against me, but person B) hated me, because of my associating with person A).

People will hate for stupid reasons.

Back to the first situation, anyways I did later run into these two on separately on different occasions and I did just walk away and ignore them both. So that was also first hand experience.
I think when some people are around you, they bring bad things into your realm, be in this one or another. (If you believe such things, and when they are gone, your life get's better.) I believe some others bring good things into your life, and when they are around, things just get better and better.

In my experience if someone cares about you, really cares about you, it's like a protective shield, I don't care if it's a best friend, love, child, parent, etc, when someone cares about you, truly cares about you, they bring, honor, grace, and love into your life, and good energy towards you and things go good.

I find others with selfish or bad intentions towards you, or who hate you, bring you down, and create very negative situations, and should be avoided at all cost, on all realms. I think the difference shows.

If you are in a situation, friendship, and you have doubts or questions, just ask yourself, what kinds of experiences, situations, events, do they bring in your life, how does it make your soul feel? That's a good way to start to gauge if this person is an asset or a liability for your life.

Some people feel good to be around, you might even feel happy to be around them, but they could still be an energy draining type of person, and bring bad things into your realm. It's about energy, and you want to connect with the right types of people. People who are feeders, who feed off of others, can associate and they will be just fine, because they have nothing to lose, and they give out nothing, but if you then place yourself in that situation, you might notice a lot of negative happenings in your life, and it might be a good idea to disconnect and disassociate from that situation. Usually when you do, you will see an improvement in your life. Some situations are unhealthy.

Fishing expeditions.

They try to find out what targets are sensitive to? what they will react to? What you can use to engage them? There is usually what I call a conductor telling people where to sit, where to stand, should they approach the target, when to conduct an action when not to. In this regard it's more coordinated then we realise.

Jiverly and Kimveer

I don't believe that they ever found the Gang Stalking sites. I think having a community to socialize with could have been very helpful. I think it might have help to stop some of this from happening.


Police Controlled

They don't really have to be police controlled. You have lot's of co-workers and other in the community, that are just regular snitches, that are more than happy to mess with your stuff. Remember in regular case of mobbing we hear about this stuff all the time. Stealing stuff, messing with their things, and other parasitic mobbing behaviours. They don't have to be police controlled snitches. I was just pointing out that if you are in desperate situations it can be easier to manipulate you.

Immigration

These people have my full sympathy. I don't believe their immigration situations should be used, to get them to do things, or as leverage, but this is getting used. I think it's horrible. If you thought the drug cases were bad this is worst.

Imagine being a mother or a father, separated from your kids, you have no way of getting in communication with them, seeing them etc, and you want them to come here, and you have a gun being held to your head. You have some third party holding you hostage in this way, and manipulating you. Your situation is just as vulnerable, if not more vulnerable then the drug informants.

The same is true for husbands kept from their wives, wives kept from husbands. Kids kept from dying or sick parents.

A lot of immigrants are hard working, they come here and just like everyone else they want a chance. To manipulate them like this is cruel and wrong, and it should never be used as leverage, but in a Stais like society, everything is used as leverage. You attack and go after people's vulnerabilities. I think it's wrong, and I feel very sad for them.

That's why I don't think they should be used. If people like Rachel Hoffman were vulnerable due to their situation, then immigrants are equally as vulnerable because of their circumstances and they should not be used and manipulated that way.

Portrayal of a target

I mentioned that they are going for the crazy thing the same way that Russia did. This is not made up, I have heard this back many times. I again think that's funny. You have people saying that being on the Internet is a sign of mental illness, so I guess a lot of people are crazy. I always wonder who get's to decided these things?

As I have also mentioned as time goes on, I get other things, they go fishing and try to add on other things. So you just have to watch your back.

Torture

Some people think that this is just about the target being sleep deprived. If you had someone using a laser on you, or radar gun, or transducers below the dry wall, then maybe you would understand that it's also physical torture.

Then you have the psychological things. People trying to get you upset so that they will get you to lash out. So a lack of sleep, being tortured, then you are expected to function, while being constantly provoked, and I did mention the complete stupidity of many in this program, added to their lack of a moral center, and their ability to forget what's legal or moral, anything to fit in, and go along with the group and you have dangerous situations.

It is not the lone event, it is the accumulation, done over a period of time. This is the reason why mobbing had been so successful, and we have seen mobbing targets snap by just being mobbed at work. Targeted Individual have a Triple fight on their hands. They are mobbed at work, in the community, and in their homes, plus they get the added benefit of torture.

This is why I speculate that this might well be getting used to groom targets to snap. If you know what makes someone tick, you might be able to get them to snap when you want to as well. I mean these actions, these activities are being recorded for someone, for something, and so this is a reasonable speculation.

The windows shaking, and the walls dancing, would be more transducer stuff. But if you touch the walls, if feels like a sheet of electricity, in my opinion. It just vibrates. It feels so freaky.

Corrupted Results

I changed my minds, even if these people are not controlled informants, they are equally as dangerous and capable of giving corrupted results. Anytime you have a country that has it's citizens spying on each other, you are going to run into bad situations. The police controlled informants, on the surface have more vulnerabilities than the other informants, but each are capable of giving corrupted results, or following secondary agendas. It's just with police controlled informants, they might not know their rights, be more desperate, and more at the mercy of these people. However on a psychological level, the person who wants to fit in, who wants to avoid being targeted themselves, can be equally bullied into performing immoral actions.

We saw this in Stasi Germany with what good people were wiling to do to their neighbours, friends, family, lovers, children, parents, and we saw this is in Hitler's Germany, with the community helping to round up persons of Jewish origin. The state can motivate people to do
horrendous things to each other.

Ignore them

Ignore them, and hopefully they will just crawl away.

The term bullies suit these creatures very well. They honestly to God want someone to play with, the more attention you give them, the more they love it.
Most of these people have nothing, and never will have anything special or worthwhile in their life outside of this.

Don't expect remorse or understanding, just like the East German Stasi, most have to convince themselves that what they are doing is good. A kind of Stockholm Syndrome, that allows these people to self identify with what the state is doing to them, and those around them. In a normal functioning society, the citizenry is not held hostage to an informant system. Again many do this as their own free wills, but what I see is some targets who after a time give in and start to go along with this, and that's why I am suggesting that there might be a form of Stockholm happening, because how else do you explain going along with this, after.


Police Reports.

If you do file a police report, file one report, give brief descriptions, stick to what you can prove, if you have any evidence, make a copy and give the copy to the police.
Write up the report, and hand deliver it. Don't do it over the phone. Get a number for the report that you filed.

Request your freedom of information act, to make sure that the report was correctly filed, and that it was filed in general.

If you keep calling the police, they have a record of the numbers that call them, and they can record you as being a nuisance caller, or emotionally disturbed. In many cases these officers might well be aware of what is happening. Just make the report, and don't call them unless you have evidence, and always keep the original, and video what you have or back it up, but don't just give evidence over, or it might accidentally get lost.


Blogging.

When we blog, we do it to try to wake people up to what is happening to us, but do not give them any clues or ideas. The more we blog about what affects us, the more these idiots try to use it in the programing. You can name the Stimuli that they are trying to use, or briefly describe what they are trying to do, but be brief in how it's affecting you. These people feed off of this, and so they need to know what is working and what is not. I have tested this for the last over a year. Every time I report an action, I can like trained monkeys get them to start doing more of it, offline.

Everytime I give feedback to something illegal they are doing, they will do more of it, if they can get away with it.


Reporting Crime.

If you are reporting crime that others have to witness, then try to have evidence first. Eg. If you report that you are getting vibrations or heat in your home, and the maintenance person has to come and check it out, you can be sure that is when the vibrations will stop, and after he/she leaves that will be when they will start up again. They like doing this so they can report that you are being paranoid, or just making stuff up, a sort of schizoaffective disorder. They lie, and they are dishonest. Even if you had someone who really wanted to investigate this, the same thing would happen and they would not know that they are being manipulated.


Witnesses.

Because they are parasites and bullies, they don't like witnesses. If it looks like you are video taping them, recording them, or exposing them, they get real quite. The same works if you are with someone or talking to someone. They are like flies buzzing around someones head.


Energy

They are parasites and they feed in many cases off of energy. Learn about psychic shielding. Learn how to protect your energy. They love it when they can keep you in that stressed out mood, or in that bad energy mode. When I am happy they are sad. Be happy because you want to be happy, but realise that this does ruin their day.
Ignore them.

Honestly, don't pretend to ignore them, just ignore them. They are stupid, they are so stupid it must her to be them. Many are as stupid as dirt, but that would be an insult to dirt. The more I am exposed to them, the more I realise that they are just not worth it. I don't mean to generalize, but most are just not worth your time.

I know it's hard to ignore them, especially when they take their job so seriously that they can't even follow the instructions that the conductor is giving them, or they are so F**king stupid, they have to come and sit almost on your lap to watch you. Thank them for the lap dance, but then ask them to bugger off. Mostly try to not engage them.

Read a book, listen to music, talk on a cell phone. They are in their own sick little game. You do have to be mindful of it however, because many of these people are just stupid, and this is the only thing they have going in their lives, many will go outside of the rules of any kind of human common sense to try to get your attention, and to keep you engaged. Remember if they lose the target they lose the game.

The more they can get you to play the game the better chance they have of getting you to freak out, lose it on them, and get yourself into trouble.


The Conductor.

There is always someone conducting things. If I am in a mood to pay them any attention, I try to find the conductor. It's fun to mess with their game, but it's better to ignore them, but if you do record them, and can get away with it, take the picture of the one conducting things on that particular ride. Eg. I had a conductor recently trying to get people to instigate little things, I won't say what. Once I spotted him, and honed in on him, and it was more interesting. I will leave it at that. They use what we write online for feedback, what we discuss on the phone. Most of the clues that the clueless get are from us, so let's not give them any.

To the best of your ability, find the things in this world that are worthy and that are valuable, and it's not them. They are not worth it. You are of more value than this, have more worth, and don't have the time to waste on this.

Legal.

Do try to explore every legal angel that we can. proof is good. If we can get them caught, or find laws to exploit, or use things like the ACLU's recent announcement that these types of investigations are ongoing. Remember just like when the police and their controlled snitches get caught with their pants down these people are the same things. Until they are put back in their proper places they will just keep running wild.


Power


It's the only thing they have in their lives. This program does not use the best or the brightest, in many cases the ones that are doing the stupidest things, are the dregs of society, the ones people would normally spit at, ignore, or bully themselves. They feel empowered with the so called fake power they have been given, and they love it, it makes them feel like somebody, it's no different than the kid that joins a street gang and who will do anything to fit in, but I have respect for kids who would join gangs, in comparison to these people. I do not advocate joining gangs, I am just saying at least mixed up kids in gangs can be helped, most of these people can not.

Belonging is the other reason they join, they don't fit in otherwise, and this gives them a sense of community. They don't care if that sense of community involves, breaking into someones home, poisoning someones child diabetic medicine, driving someone off the road, driving someone to suicide, they have no moral center left in many cases, and this is what they have. They believe that they are on the side of good, and they much like the Nazi's, or the Stasi, act accordingly.
Again this is a generalization, there will be exceptions to every rule, they obviously don't all act like this, but enough do, that's you have to have some way to defend yourself.

They like to portray the target as the problem, when the truth is many of these people have problems themselves, and the government gives them free reign to try to take out their problems on others. Normal functioning people do not show the level of pathology that many of these people exhibit.

There only goal is to try to engage the target, continually trying to find some new hook so that they don't lose their participant in the game. These people would probably be on twitter begging for followers if they did not have you to follow around. They have menial lives and this in many cases fills avoid.

Many are from countries where this is a normal way of life, and they think nothing of it.


Lights
You really do have to be lights in a world that has gone dark.
Try to meditate and pray as you start your day.


Weapons

A lot of times they do try to look like they are something special. They like us to think they are using very sophisticated weapons. In many cases these creatures are using things like lasers, radar guns, thing below the floors or the dry wall, that can cause vibrations. The more we know about what they are using the better, that way we can give accurate descriptions to others. We will have less chances of those who do watch our online community, accusing us of making things up, or just being crazy.

"And perps can purchase transducers of the type used in industrial sonic baths and mechanically fix them with screws to floor joists or wall studs underneath repaired drywall, completely hidden from view of normal inspection. The transducers will make your floors vibrate and probably create heat. They spend a lot of time hiding their stuff in houses or apartments so it won’t be found under simple visual inspection. If somebody really decides to start looking they *will* start finding these things. These tactics are part of the never ending “smoke and mirrors” routine. Apparently the perps get a “charge” out of inducing false perceptions."

I like to call it walls vibrating, or dancing, either way it's the same thing. Thank you so much to the person who posted this so many years ago, it helped me so much.

Smoke and mirrors, is the best way to describe what they do. They do want you to think that
they are all powerful, but they are amateurs in many ways. They want to look powerful, so when we write about this that and the other, and the state of the art this that they are using, they feel better about themselves.

Many times they have not even thought of using XY or Z on us, and then we might blog about it, and it gives them an idea. Thinking is not their strong point.

I try to remember to not go off on rants, but I have my good days and bad.
Beyond that if you can go without blogging about them, or anything else, just have them fade into nothing. I hope this information helps some of you that are out there.

MJ the real.

Now that Michael Jackson is gone I still have questions.

The Michael Jackson situation has always bothered me. I was never fully convinced about the pedophile charges.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvhwWDCV9Bo

The second case I saw coming a mile away. After I saw the interview that Micheal did, where a UK journalist followed him around with a camera, after I saw the portion of the interview with a boy in the interview I was concerned, and felt very strongly that a false accusation would come up once again.

When the second accusation came up some time later, and the identity was reveled to be the boy in the interview, I felt that that my prediction had been accurate, and I felt strongly that this accusation as I had predicted and could be false. I feel I had seen it coming a mile away, what's odd is that Micheal Jackson had not.

Jackson seems to have held on to a very peter pan existence for as long as he could. He seemed to have been very child like. It's like he really didn't get how cold, and cruel this world could be.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2009/06/26/2009-06-26_the_stain_of_kidsex_raps_plagued_career_weird_sleepovers_with_boys_huge_payouts_.html

For the second accusation, I strongly believe it was a s false accusation, but what about the first case?

I did not follow it as closely as I could have, and in the following years I have never researched it. The things that had bothered me about the case however are as follow.

He paid out money, why would you pay out money if you are innocent? I thought that innocent people would not do this, but in time, since doing research, I find that this is not always the case. I have now seen Gang Stalking targets admit to being drug users, in order to get their child back from the state.

At the time that this happened, I could not believe that a child would make an accusation like that unless it was true? In time I have now seen groups of people accused by children who were coached be accused of being pedophiles, only to have it come out years later that the children were coached.

I don't know if this could have been the case here, there was other disturbing details. It has been said that the child knew details of a birth mark that was on Micheal's lower anatomy. This is worrisome, and again makes me wonder what happened?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1195825/Humiliation-dark-obsession-children--stain-lingering-Michael-Jacksons-legacy.html

I don't think any adult should be around a child that is not there's in any capacity that exposes such details, be it going to the bathroom with them in the room or other. The rules might vary with very close relatives, who are also like parental figures, or care givers.

This has always worried me about the case. However Micheal spent years befriending kids like Macaulay Culkin and there was never an accusation, at least not that I am aware of.
I believe he paid off the first case to make it go away, guilty or innocent, he could not handle what was happening, I think the accusation tore at his soul. I do now understand it's very possible to frame someone to make it seems as if they are a pedophile, some of the men in the Targeted Individual community face this fact.

I believe the trial changed him. I think we saw a lot of the in subsequent years manifest itself in his outward appearance and weirdness.

There is no doubt that he became eccentric. He married Lisa Marie in later years. I have personally always believed it was to help restore his image after the trial. That doesn't make it a bad thing. Lisa Marie insists that it was a real marriage, but I sort of don't fully believe that.
His second wife Debbie later in trial, claims that the two children of their union were artificially inseminated, and that there were not his biologically. I sort of believe her, which also means they too most likely did not have normal marital relations.

The baby swinging incident was just bad judgement. What was he thinking? I think the incident just further shows me he shows poor taste, and bad judgement. He was so intense on the fans, that he really made a bad call. It's something someone much younger with bad judgement might have done, and it did not help his case.

Since his death I have found a lot of good information. You can learn a lot from some of these websites. The articles that I found of interest was one that was going over details of the first trial. I will post the link.

http://www.usnewslink.com/framedjackson.htm

How should he be remembered? In my mind there are so many unanswered questions? Was he really a pedophile, or were the accusations baseless, and was it just people taking advantage of his childlike nature? Was there some truth to the rumour? Was it just groundless?

I think Jackson had a very unreal sense of what the world should be like, vs what it was. He believe that there was nothing wrong with having kids over, and even having them stay over in his room. It could be completely innocent, but if you are a 40 something, unmarried, eccentric, people are going to wonder at the best of times, and at the worst of times they will swallow anything that is thrown at them.

I am going to withhold judgement, because I have never felt that I had all the pieces of the puzzle. I do know that if he really was not a pedophile, we have done him a great injustice. I see the comments, and they are like nails. They are pretty terrible, and if he was not a pervert, then what a horrible way to be remembered, and have your name destroyed, especially if he was innocent.

If he was a pervert in anyway, then he does not deserve the adoration that he is getting. He was talented there is no doubt about that, but talent does not excuse bad behaviour, it did not with Jerry Lee Lewis, and it should not with people like R. Kelly when there is clear evidence for the case.

With Jackson the lines and some of the lies are very blurry. He was weird toward the end, but I think he was childlike, maybe more than we know. I do think that there could be more ongoing than most ever dreamed. I am learning more in the last 48 hrs about rumours, of conspiracy against him, and what he felt was ongoing in this regard, than I have in the last 15 years or so. It's been interested.

What I do know, I owe it to myself to try to learn the truth, no matter what it is. I now know that this world can make you look, appear or seem to be anything that it wants you to be, for good or for bad. I know that there are some leech like parasites in the world who will take advantage of and feed off, those unsuspecting, childlike types. There are many who will feed off of the innocent, and take the most innocent comment, action, gesture, sentiment, out of context and make it into something that it is not.

Since his death a lot of this has been confirmed, by his ex-wife Lisa Marie, when she talks about some of the constant leeches around him, and how she tried to save him from self destructive behaviour and those around him who did not have his best intentions at heart.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/reuters/090626/entertainment/centertainment_us_jackson_lisamarie

[quote]Presley wrote that she and Jackson's family tried to save him from "the inevitable, which is what just happened" but she became overwhelmed and had to end their relationship.
"I became very ill and emotionally/ spiritually exhausted in my quest to save him from certain self-destructive behavior and from the awful vampires and leeches he would always manage to magnetize around him," she wrote.[/quote]

Then we are hearing more about the people around him, who might have given him bad advise, and also about the drugs, someone was saying that compared to the Anna Nicole situation, hers was nothing compared to this, and the leeches around him.

http://www.showbizspy.com/article/188369/michael-jackson-died-of-drugs-overdose

[quote]Brian Oxman, the Jackson family attorney, told CNN that the superstar had a very serious problem with prescription medication, and that the people that were surrounding him were enablers. “If you think the case with Anna Nicole Smith was an abuse, it’s nothing in comparison to what we have seen taking place in Michael Jackson’s life.”[/quote]

What a shock. He seems to have had a lot of these types in his life.

http://www.kansascity.com/stargazing/story/1282600.html

So for me, it's a matter of discovering the truth. I want to know the truth for the three kids that he was raising. If he was not a pervert or a pedophile, then we deserve to know the truth, and if he was, then that needs to be made clear as well. Paying out money does not unequivocally mean that one is guilty. Being weird and eccentric also does not equate guilt.

I would like to know the truth one way or another. If he is innocent, then the world did him a great injustice, and the least we could do is clear his name. If he is guilty then the adoration is misplaced and disgraceful. Truth is sometimes somewhere in the middle.

Anyways for the time being I do wish is soul peace, his kids and family the best, and I wish the world truth, since they are often more willing to swallow lies.

Down with the snitching

I am just sitting here thinking about some past jobs I have had and some encounters that I have had with the snitches.

Again some informants are not low lives, but many others are and since this started I have seen more of the low than I have of the high.

The goal of this stalking is to make targets look like they are crazy, or whatever lie you are trying to spread, or start with one and go to another.

Remember by the time Jiverly Wong died he was a divorced loser, who could not keep a job, who had a drug addiction and had tried to rob a bank. None of that seems to have been true, but it all survived him into his death, and it's most likely what was being spread about him. On top of that he endured months of workplace mobbing, with slogans like "if it wrong it's Wong". Fun stuff.
After his company closed down and he got laid off, he tried to better himself in an English class, so he could get a better job, or find a job. He dropped out of the english class, and the indication is that he also expreienced mobbing there. Most targets do not want to be unemployed, but that is the perception that the agents of the state will try to give, to justify what is happening.

I am a fairly bright, articulate, and intelligent person. Somewhat independent and before this, a pretty high functioning person. I am still a pretty high functioning person, but now I am fighting against stuff most people only have nightmares about.

I am like targets of Cointelpro fighting against a system that will go to any and every extreme to bring me down. With Jiverly Wong I often wonder if Shopvac closed on it's own via natural means, or if they had a hand in it. I am wondering because many targets talk about the construction projects that pop up all over the city where we are. They go on for years at a time. We are not paranoid in this. They seem capable and willing to go through any means necessary to take targets down. You see this with whistle-blowers and others.

I know others who have experienced, having companies close soon after the target was going to be working there. Or in other cases, if they were trying to work with companies who specialised in products to be delivered the company stopped providing the function.

Anyways at my jobs since I have been a target, the idea is to get me fired from every job, make me look crazy or inefficient. To that end, the informants where I live, they are allowed to use a radar gun, or something that produces large amounts of heat, or other things that cause vibrations in my home, to heat up my skin, to heat up my body, to try to make sure that I am sleep deprived and unable to function.

Most times I can now overcome this, but it's a process. For much of the last few years, because of what is happening with having a variety of weapons used on me in my home, I sometimes function on less sleep than the average person. Many targets get only a few hours sleep every night for months, because they can't stay in one position for very long, and they constantly change positions, trying to not be burnt, or tortured.

I have had trouble with jobs over the last few years. Before this my records with keeping jobs is perfect. I lasted at most for years at a time, and left when I choose to.

I experienced workplace mobbing, and when it got extreme, like many other targets, I used vacation and other absent time to try to cope, but beyond that, a pretty good worker.
The other obstacle is that targets in the workplace have informants who are trying to get us to lose our jobs. I relayed the story of one group that I dealt with who went to my manager after I decided to move away from them, due to tactics like logging me out of my phone on breaks, to try to make it look like I was not punching out of the phones on breaks, which is a no no. After fun little things like that, I decided to move away from this group, who later when to my manager and advised that I was being unfriendly to them. Well this got me written up, and my manager telling me to be more friendly to them. I was, I told them that if they had anything work related they could feel free to approach me, but beyond that not so much. This was their attempt in my opinion to get me in trouble or fired from my job.

This don't come to me unless it's work related thing worked great, till one of the persons in that same group was able to get the biotch he was banging to get me fired from the the job anyways. It might have been indirect, but the results were the same. The biotch he was banging got her manager friends from what I heard to help get me fired.

I ran into these two some time later on separate occasions, and what do you really say to people like that? I mean do you say hey, thanks for getting me fired from my job? No you just ignore them. You just look at them and walk off. Leave them to comfort each other, knowing how unpleasant the strain of it all must have been for them, I mean having to run into the person you helped get fired, oh the trauma of it all, for them. Anyways, I am sure in some other dimension we are all BFF's (Best Friends Forever) not. The chances are good that if people like that made your life hell here, they are likely to make your life hell in some other dimension, equally so or 1000 times more. If you believe in that stuff.

What I do notice is this, you always have specific people who are doing the same roles that I noticed on the train. So even though it's been two years plus since I had any sensitivity, you still get the informants who try to make it look like I am sensitity. I can say without a shadow of a doubt that any incidents reported in the last over two years saying that I still have a sensitivify is a blatant lie. Yet every job I get, or on the street, they still try to fish. What I am wondering is, what is the legal period of time, that these governments can do this for? What are the paramators? What is the limitation and the scope? Are they just allowed to fish forever? Come on people, this might be a good angle to look into.

There is no governing body, that is why you could have them fuc* with people's lives like Kimveer Gill, and Jiverly Wong for years at a time. They could do anything that they wanted to, and there was no governing body to intervene. Also since these two did not know exactly what was happening, it must have been so bad. Kimveer knew he was under investigation, and Jiverly knew the cops were involved, but I don't think either had every found a Gang Stalking website, which is too bad. They might have found a supportive community and a way to deal with what was ongoing. people to talk to. I know Kimveer turned to the goth community, but that's not the same thing, cause he was not able to openly discuss what was happening. There are just posting here and there. I find often that only another target, can acturally understand what I am going through, most people just can't get their minds fully around it.

Anyways, so there will be informants where you work, and the only job of these under police controlled snitches will be to get you fired, or to make you look bad. So usually you get people trying to play with the phone logs, or finding other ways to try to make you look bad. Computer security at work becomes important. Do not put anything that is opened in the fridge. I don't have to tell you that.

You are going to get a conductor, someone who co-ordinats the harassments and looks for reactions. Then you will get someone or usually many snitches that are going to be told, that they must do X Y Z. So if you are being framed to look like a racist, they will try to get you to say racist things, or if you are being made to look like a pervert, they will bring in mags, or engage in other conversation, if it's crazy with a sensitivity, they will be told to perform the sensitivity throughout the day with someone observing your reactions. If the person observing your reactions, or doing the sensitivity are police controlled informants, then you have a problem, because then they follow the official agenda, and a second agenda given to them by their handlers. (These types of police controlled informants, do not belong in these types of investigations, because they will have a secondary agenda, always.) The regular informants are fine, but these types, are designed to get you fired from your job, or to portray you, however the handler, and those conducting the investigation see fit.

Many of them will also be example in difficult situations, I get a lot of people in immigration situations, or all races. Others in money situations, anything like this, and people will do desperate things. It's how the Stasi worked, and it's how our government now works. If they are holding something over these people, it makes them dangerous, and they will do whatever their handlers tell them to do. The image of Jiverly Wong being a loser, drug user, etc, did not maintain itself, it had lot's of help.

Over the last few years, crazy has been the main thing to try to portray me as. Oh and a loser who can't hold a job. Well when someone is allowed to try to keep you awake and sleep deprived for months and years at a time, and sometimes you are getting 3 hours sleep, because you become hypersensitive, then it's easy to make someone miss work, or perform badly. I could probably do it, and in less time to the informants. I have worked well under the conditions that have been given to me. I have not yet excelled the way that I am accustomed, but sometimes surviving is the key. I want to do more than survive however.

If I can help other targets to get through this, to not kill themselves, or others, to not wind up in the mental ward, or jail, to not be portrayed as whatever, then I am doing a part of what I am meant to do.

I am awake right now, cause they again switched what they were doing, to try to keep me awake at nights and sleep deprived, so I have to fix this, and then get on with it. With this targeting, only another target can understand at times what is happening. Most people do not understand the concept that this is torture. The sleep deprivation, the being burnt with lasers, radar guns, other electronic weaponry, or directed energy weapons. They don't understand what it's like to have someone rewire the electricity in your home, so that the walls are dancing with electricity. They did this recently and it was so bad, the windows were shaking in my home. When you touched the walls, they were just vibrating, you can do this by messing with the electricity and rewiring, but it's illegal. Yet informants do this stuff all the time, because the police controlled ones do anything that their handlers tell them to.

Remember the Cathrine Johnson case, she was 90, and they broke down her door and shot her. Well they planted drugs in her home, and they claimed that the informant had bought drugs there, well killing an innocent old woman was even more than the informant could handle and he told the press, that no, that was a lie, and the cops in that case were put in jail, but they do this all the time. The controlled informants should not be allowed to interact with targets. They in many cases have no integrity. (Not all cases, some people will always have integrity.) The problem is you have people like Rachel Hoffman, who get desperate, and agree to desperate things, or do desperate things to others so that they can survive, it becomes a game of eat or be eaten, and it creates a nasty society. It's not right. The results are what you see, and the events that consistently unfold.

Even the informants who get the white glove treatment, like the ones who are paid to spy, they can get corrupted by the money being thrown at them. Got a tip about the employee you are working with? Are you sure they didn't say something racist? Are you sure they didn't hint at liking kidddy porn? Are you sure they didn't react to the sensitivity? Etc. It's not hard to get someone to lie, and they do.

Then there are the honest mistakes. People who thought or are so paranoid that they make faulty judgements. The informants are not professionals, and even under the best conditions professionals make mistakes, well in many cases, I have sat there, while they think someone else is the target, and just watched them, trying to provoke the person, and it's horrible, because they are so convinced the person A is crazy, they will see crazy. I have had them sit there looking at someone who was not the target, and then they are like oh did you see that, or they indicate it, yeah because normal action is now crazy. I just smile and nod, or smile and do nothing. I think of the times, that my normal actions must have been like, oh the the target did that, and the retelling was exaggerated, or just fabricated, not even deliberately, but many of them get so caught up, they just make bad assessments.

They are a fascinating study. In my opinion, the police controlled informants should not be in the workplaces doing the assessments on targets, because you will get corrupted results. People in immigration situations, or money situations, or other situations where something is being held on them, should not be in these roles, because you will get corrupted results, but just like with the Stasi, that's the idea.

So the goal of these people is to make me look like a crazy person, who can't keep a job, who might be into drugs, who is now racist. (Yeah I am shocked by the last bit, but apparently if you research extremist sites, not post anything mind you, but just research that is enough for a fishing expedition.) These people are corrupt and you have to stay up to date on their every move.

Even when you try to explain this to the society at large, they don't care. They are the first ones to insult, and judge the Kimveers Gill's, and Jiverly Wong's of this world, as pycho, but they take no ownership for their roles in creating these psycho's. Society has a responsibility to take ownership for what is happening and to try to help prevent it. Many people can take a role in making sure some of these reforms and recommendations happen, not just for our safety, but for the safety of society.

Also next time, I will go over the pattern of the Manchurian Target. Someone who is not mind controlled, but who is targeted and groomed to the stage where the state knows that they could snap, and then they use them like we saw in the Jiverly Wong situation. As a target I can't go to the bathroom without them knowing, yet Jiverly Wong, who owns guns, and uses them regularly, who had just lost his job, dropped out of the english language school, entered a place he had dropped out of, first parking his car in the back, and was then went into the front of the building, yet no one was on hand to stop him? Really, and there are reports that the news copters were in the sky very quickly, and the info about when the 911 call was made. Anyways it might be something worth looking into. Was this event allowed to happen? Remember the killing sprees were going to be used, to get gun laws passed, but well let's just say the more we highlight the ongoing agenda, the better chance we have of slowing it down, and who knows, maybe
stopping it.

Down with the dysfunctionality

Down with the dysfunctionality.

Jon and Kate plus eight are soon to be no more. Am I celebrating. Sort of.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/090623/entertainment/us_tv_jon__amp__kate_split

I have never seen the show, I have never heard of them before they started to appear on my news almost weekly if not daily.

It just seemed like the relationship was dysfunctional, and it could not have been working for them or more importantly the children. Children always come first, and as much as I hate the concept of a broken home, if the drama is always going to be ongoing, then you need to call it quits, if not for yourself, then for the kids.

First it was rumours of his affair. I thought let's cut the guy some slack, sometimes a friend is just a friend, but then the "friend" was caught also driving his car, and her brother is telling tales of it being so much more than that. Now he could have been lying, but clearly there was more to this friendship than met the eye.

Then the rumours of her cheating or accusations started. The fact that they had eight little lives riding on them, escaping everyone throughout the drama of it all.

Then there were rumours of them fighting, her spanking her daughter, and all this other junk, that was no bodies business. It wasn't my business, I personally did not care, but obviously, most families will not last in the glare of the spotlight, it will take it's toll as it did on these two, and here we are.

So there divorce papers were filed on Monday and as the articles said. Kate plus 8 separate. Cute.

I hope they can figure out there stuff for the kids, because at the end of the day, the kids are all that matter.

The next couple that were in the news till it made me sick. The Chris Brown and Rhianna affair.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/accesshollywood/090622/entertainment/chris_brown_strikes_plea_deal__avoids_jail_time_in_assault_case

Well actually his alleged affair and her battered and bruised face. Who could forget those images.
After the incident happened and there was the arrest, I thought that was the end of that, but then no they got back together, and you heard rumours from her friends that maybe she was still getting yelled at, I just thought, if it's gotten to the stage where it's so dysfunctional that he can hit you like you are Tina turner and he is ick, then you need to get out.

I don't think that Chris Brown on his own is a bad person, but with Rhianna, it's not a good look for him, or for her clearly. I am in no way shape or form excusing his behaviour or what he did to her, but I do know that if you are around the wrong people, they can bring out the worst in you. Just like Targets having to be around informants day in day out.

I think people want love to last, they want things to work out, I think that's why he gave her the ring, and they tried for the quickie reunion. They wanted it to seem like it was not that bad, but it was that bad. His actions were uncontrolled, his temper could have killed her, and the thing is, because he did not take the time to find out why he did it, there was no way to say that it would not happen again.

The reality is most times if a man will hit once, they will hit again and again. If you are a guy and you find that you are in a situation where you are putting your hands on a woman, get out of that situation, get some counselling. If you are a woman in an unhealthy abusive situation, get out, get some counseling. The relationship will not reflect well on you, and there is a good chance that he will kill you. If you have kids, even more of an incentive to get out. Lucky for us, Chris and Rhianna did not have any kids.

They broke up and a week later Chris was dating an ex girlfriend, (Yeah love is just so eternal), and Rhianna recently found someone else. They both seem to be doing better and that's what really counts, and more importantly, I hope I won't have to read about them anymore, because it was so annoying.

Lastly he got community service and 5 years probation. I think this issue could have been handled between the two of them, because again it was no ones business, but Rhianna is an influence to millions of young girls and so society did have to put pressure on for that relationship to end. I think in this case it was for the best. I know there are lot's of Chris and Rhianna fans who will feel different, but I think in this case it was what was for the best, and it was what was healthy.

Young guys and girls need to understand that these types of relationships are not healthy, they are abusive, and they usually do not end well.

http://dailyblabber.ivillage.com/entertainment/archives/2008/02/hulk-hogan-accused-of-having-a.html

We did not hear too much about this one, but I will list it under my down with the dysfunctional.
Recently Hulk Hogan, lesser known as Terry Bollea.

Hulk Hogan decided to enhance his 25 year marriage by having an affair with his daughters best friend. For some reason this did not go over too well, his wife decided to divorce him. Oh there were a whole bunch of other dysfunctional things ongoing, but the affair is what did it.
Then to get back at him, she decided to hook up, with a guy who went to the same school as her son. Her new man is 19 years old. She is being called a cougar.

First of all, guys if you are in a relationship and you are even half serious about that person, you are not going to do stupid things to mess that up. People do stray, things can happen, but remember guys, hell has no fury. That saying exists for a reason.

I don't think the Hulksters wife would be off with some 19 year old, if he had not decided to cheat on her with the daughters best friend. I mean it's not a fun thing to have happen, and the results of this are in and they are not pretty.

Hulk Hogan is upset that he does not have a wife. Gee I wonder why, but recently he made a comment saying that he "totally understood OJ", was cause for concern.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/TV/04/16/hulk.hogan.oj/index.html

[quote] Hulk Hogan said his comments to Rolling Stone magazine that he can "totally understand" O.J. Simpson -- the former football great found liable for the deaths of his wife and another man -- are being misunderstood.Linda and Hulk Hogan enjoy happier times at the 2006 MTV Video Music Awards in New York.

The pro wrestling legend said Wednesday that he "took the high road" and "didn't do the O.J. Simpson thing" despite the pain of his bitter divorce fight with wife Linda.
Hogan's lawyer said the quotes leaked to a gossip column have been taken out of context and the full article proves Hogan "never condones the O.J. situation." Video Watch Hogan claim he was misquoted »

A spokesman for Linda Hogan said the statement amounts to a death threat and that her attorney is "weighing all options necessary to protect his client."

"His violent and scary mood swings have been my nightmare for too many years," Linda Hogan said Thursday in a written statement. "I hope for the sake of our kids that he gets the psychological help for himself and the safety of others."

Her spokesman, Gary Smith, said, "For those who buy his claim the comment was taken out of context, read the rest of Rolling Stone and determine for yourself if his suicidal tendencies coupled with the use of drugs and alcohol make him a danger."

The controversial quote is part of a eight-page feature article about Hogan to be published in the magazine's Friday edition.Don't Miss

"I could have turned everything into a crime scene like O.J., cutting everybody's throat," Hogan told Rolling Stone. "You live half a mile from the 20,000-square-foot home you can't go to anymore, you're driving through downtown Clearwater [Florida] and see a 19-year-old boy driving your Escalade, and you know that a 19-year-old boy is sleeping in your bed, with your wife... .

"I totally understand O.J. I get it."[/quote]

He has tried to drive her new man Charlie off the road. So though I really do like Hulk Hogan, I think when a guy makes a threat like that, or takes some kind of action in that direction, maybe you need to take it seriously.

I have respected the Hulkster most of my life, but that comment was pretty bad, that coupled with the fact that that Charlie says the Hulk tried to run him off the road, they might want to take the situation seriously.

It's too bad, because he thought that he was going to cheat and she was just going to take it, and the wife of, 25 years, decided to get some of her own back.

http://woodenspears.com/tag/linda-hogan/

A lot of the younger ones today, have this sort of mentality. They have the one girl wife, and they think it's ok to have a bunch of other relationships on the side. Thus in turn causing a lot of Maury Povich drama. They have the main girl, who they give a ring of ownership to or something like that, there's a trendy name for it, can't recall it off hand, and they conduct themselves in this manner, and large portions of society think this is ok.

Kids it's not ok. Marriage is about forsaking all others, giving up the others and settling for one. If you are going to be seeing others on the side, do the world a favor and don't get married. This goes double for you adults who think the swinging thing is ok. If you want to swing, stay single, or just date, but once you get married, or plan to be in a long term relationship, then keep in mind what marriage traditionally was designed for.

My prayers are with the Jolie-Pitts and their children. I am hoping that they can work out any ruff patches they may be going through, before they fall into the above dysfunctional categories.
So again, as much as I like stable families, sometimes it's better and safer to get out, sometimes the dysfunctionality is too great, and primarily, if you have kids and they are going to suffer, then sometimes a relationship needs to be put down, it's just safer and healthier for everyone involved, and there are many items more news worthy.

The Gang Stalking File

The case against me and what I understand of it.


The gangstalking file.


http://www.workplacebullying.org/2009/05/14/uk-green2/

[quote]The largest part of the award is the £640,000 awarded for future loss of earnings and a pension, and it is this portion which marks the case out as unusual.

“We have seen cases like this before a number of times but the court has awarded such a large amount because it took the view that this person would not be able to work at this salary level for a long time in the future,” said Tom Potbury, a lawyer specialising in employment law at Pinsent Masons.

Green, 36, had said she was subjected to “offensive, abusive, intimidating, denigrating, bullying, humiliating, patronizing, infantile and insulting words and behavior” and subjected to crude and lewd comments from her former colleagues. Her colleagues would move her papers, hide her post and remove her from document circulation lists. She alleged that some of the colleagues had ignored and excluded her, that her personal and professional authority was undermined, and her workload increased to unreasonable and arbitrary levels.

Her lawyer said medical experts on both sides of the case agreed that Green developed a major depressive disorder, but there was disagreement about its cause.

Deutsche Bank said it had not breached its duties to Green and denied that she was bullied, saying she had had a predisposition to mental illness. Deutsche Bank paid for stress counselling and assertiveness training for Green but she had a nervous breakdown before returning to work and suffering a relapse.[/quote]


I have read the above case scenario several times. It's funny because the workplace mobbing that I encountered was very similar in some regards to some of the things that went on in this case. Instead of being on the winning end of a lawsuit, I am on this end of an investigation, which is being used to falsely used to portray me as mentally ill.

It's funny, someone is dehumanized and degraded for several years and they no longer wish to put up with it, or emotionally can not, and the employer in this case a bank wants to place all the blame on them.

Part of what I have been trying to do is better understand the mechanisms used to place me under this investigation. One that has continued for years.

What's happening to me goes back a really long time. As mentioned before, I first became aware of the actual Gang Stalking, about three years ago, but my workplace mobbing had gone on for several years before this.

At work I was in a similar situation where workplace mobbing was daily, it was continuous and it made it impossible for me to perform my job functions. I eventually filed a complaint with the human rights commission after trying to work things out with Human Resources.

Shortly after filing the complaint C. Coughlin from HR called me into the office, in the presence of my senior manager at the time and advised me that if I did not drop the complaint, I would be required to see a Dr Brown. If I however dropped the complaint, things would back to normal. This play was disgraceful, and dirty but not uncommon.

Apparently if you decide to stand up for your rights or blow the whistle you need to speak to someone, if you instead choose option b and drop the case against them, you are of sound mind and body. Fascinating how these companies work. They use these investigations to discredit and disenfranchise their enemies. They destroy people's lives to protect their own interests. That's the true purpose of human resources in these companies.


The harassment I was exposed to included slander, lies, derogatory comments, rumors, and a stimuli which was anchored to said rumour. The stimuli was what was used for the bulk of the harassment. Because I complained primarily about the stimuli, they used this to try to portray me as mentally ill.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1144462/Man-jailed-harrassing-elderly-neighbours-whistling-Addams-Family-theme-time-saw-them.html


[quote]
Leopold Wrobel harassed the pensioners for more than four years, making them feel like prisoners in their home.

His victims, Michael and Kathleen Sharpe, said Wrobel had 'nearly succeeded' in destroying their lives.

Wrobel, 51, had been handed an anti-social behaviour order last December for harassing the couple.

But a court heard his nuisance behaviour, which had already lasted for four years, continued on the day the order was imposed.

The court was shown CCTV footage from cameras on the Sharpes' property, which picked up Wrobel's repeated whistling when they arrived at or left the house.

Michael Treharne, prosecuting, said each incident taken in isolation would probably seem silly or almost pathetic.
Leopold Wrobel taunted the elderly couple with the Addams Family theme tune

Leopold Wrobel: He taunted the couple

But he added: 'If something happens on an ongoing basis and goes on and on and on, eventually it reaches the stage of being absolutely intolerable.'

Mr Sharpe, from Wingerworth in Derbyshire, told the court Wrobel's behaviour had made his wife ill and she had started losing her hair.

'It's been devastating and it's done what he wanted to do, to try to destroy our lives,' the 68-year-old said. 'He very nearly succeeded.'

His wife told magistrates they could not leave the house without Wrobel being there. [/quote]


This couple was harassed using a stimuli, in this case the Addams family theme. It was one man, against this couple, but he managed to almost ruin their lives. In my case, I was one person, and about 80% of the peope I worked with, including most of the managers were taking part in what was ongoing. I worked with about 130 people at the time.

The very things that I complained about, at the time and filed the human rights complaint about are some of the very things individuals are now winning court cases over currently, yet in my case, it's being used to portray me as crazy, and keep a fake investigation ongoing.


Part of what I complained about is that a manager, let's call him "hateman the hitman saw", who was currently working in the same company that I was, had years earlier at a different company started a derogatory rumour about me. I stated in the complaint that I felt that this rumour had continued onto my current job.

Since I was once again working with this person, I had reasonable grounds to believe that this person was helping to fuel the flames of this degrogatory rumour, once again. I had grounds to believe it, because I heard back that this was the case. The bulk of my complaint focused on the fact that the derogatory rumours/comments had been anchored to a stimuli, and said stimuli was being used on a daily basis to make it impossible for me to perform my job functions. Eg. If the stimuli had been keys jangling, you would have the people directly around me, jangling keys for the whole shift, on several occasions, I had customers asking me about the noise in the background.

Sounds pretty simple right, not so simple, since the workplace decided to go along with what was happening.

After researching this, what I now know is that the stimuli and my reaction to it were deliberately created. I had worked with someone at the first job who was in the military. He had tried to sensitise me to three stimuli. I didn't know it at the time, that it was deliberate, but I do now. The other stimuli was pens clicking, and the actual stimuli which I became sensitive to.

What I also now know is that James, and "Hateman The Hitman Saw", were both part of the snitching friends network. What James did with the anchoring of the stimuli was deliberate. What I don't know is if he did this on his own accord, or if in fact this was more deliberate than that. James outside of work did have military connections, so I don't have the answer to this yet.


The other thing that was happening at that time is the same tactic was being used outside of the workplace to harass me in public. I was aware of this, but I was not aware of the snitching friends network.

So what you have is a target that has been deliberately sensitised. A corrupt company that wants to keep the target quite and stop them from going forward with a human rights complaint. I am not saying that this company is the only place an investigation could have originated from, because I have reason to believe that this might have started years before this, but I do believe that they used my complaint to the human rights commission to try to portray me as mentally ill, when really I was being harassed, and any actions I took to protect myself from being harassed day in and day out were fully justified. I will also state that the harassment was happening outside of the workplace, and the same applies.

So the target is aware that they are being harassed and a stimuli is being used. What they do in the course of these investigations is they try to incite and instigate incidents to further the perception of mental illness, or whatever the target is being billed as. If the target is being billed as a racist, they try to encourage negative interactions with persons of different races. If they are being billed as homophobic, they try to encourage negative interactions with people who are homosexual, if the target is being billed as a terrorist, they try to portray the target as such and make their actions look suspicious.

Since I have been targeted, they have tried the mentally ill angle several times and several different ways. I am aware that one incident that happened recently involved my handing out activism material to a group in a small cafe, about 7 people. I decided to try some viral activism, so I very impromptu handed out some papers directing the informants to visit one of the Gang Stalking websites. I mean I get people coming up to me all the time handing me flyer's for clubs, and other events, or their activism materials so I don't see the difference. However my understanding is that they are using me handing out what I consider essentially activism material to further the myth of mental illness. Right because naming informants as such and directing them to Gang Stalking websites is insane? Right. I really have to wonder about the shrills that they are using to make these types of assessments and then further disenfranchise targets?

They could in essence use a simple incident such as this and use it to get employers current to flag you. Yet is not activism what I do on a daily basis? Why should my handing out activism material be seen or evaluated any differently than anyone else?

When they can't prove that you are crazy, the scope of the investigation might shift. It's what I call a fishing expedition. Remember these investigations are often the life blood for many. The informants get a bit of money, lot's of men get construction jobs, and they use these investigations to push targets to the edge, hoping that when they do snap, they will have further proof that the informant network is doing a good job. So every time they can put a target in a mental hospital, get them behind bars, to kill themselves or others, or just attack someone, this gives them cause, and in some cases additional funding, so it's in their best interest to make you look crazy.

Recently what some informants did is that they started a group with a list of people. Many on that list did not ask to be on that list, but they started sending out emails. In those emails they used some racist or other language that might be cause for an investigation. So for example you find yourself a part of this list, which is in effect a group. You don't say anything wrong, but others in the group do, surprise, you might find yourself being investigated, because you now belong to a group spewing hate speech. The hate speech will ofcourse have been provided by the informants themselves, but what does that matter?

I had another incident where I was in the park. I had put up with 20 minutes of some idiot informant doing stupid dogs tricks while trying to keep an eye on me. Normally if you were not aware of what was happening it would not be that irritating, but it was. I was grateful when the dog boy left, and was just getting comfortable, when yet another informant showed up, this one even worst than the first, because he just stood there and stared. Well I had it, and I just gave him a glaring look before reaching into my case to get something. I had just gotten some groceries and was pretty tired, and just wanted to sit there without being disturbed.

The next thing I know, the little man pansy is running across the park like a bat out of hell, and I am thinking what the heck? I have been known to give some pretty squelching looks, but I didn't think I was that good. Next thing I know before I leave the park, there is a helicopter that literally accompanied me home on my walk from the park, and for the next two months I would become acquainted with what I call airstalking.

When I got home, the serve your drug sentence as an informant neighbour above me, decided to make contact with the neighbour below. Suddenly all friendly, can I come and hang out? This neighbour had never spoken to me before. All this other stuff and I am thinking what the heck? Apparently I came to find out that, man pansy, who ran out of the park like a bat out of hell, seems to have given them the impression that I had wires in my case, (which I did for an electronic device, I think a battery charger), and therefore maybe a bomb or incendiary device? So upstairs neighbour was just making sure I didn't blow myself and him up, and the suddenly friendly Susan above me, as I call him, was just trying to get into my apartment to look around. Well that makes sense.

Now what really get's me here is all it takes is the word of a snitch. They don't have to be logical, or truthful, they can make up anything. Now to be fair to man pansy, I don't know if he did it to be spiteful because I gave him a squelching look, or if he really believed I was dangerous, and I really don't care. These people are told the target is crazy, or what have you, and normal behaviour that would normally never be questioned suddenly becomes oh did you see that, the target blinked, what do I do, what does that mean? They are irrational and dangerous.

The other problem is positive identification. There have been so many times where I know that I was flagged as someone at a location doing xyz, and I was not. If I could see my file, I am sure I would find several incidents that were attributed to me to make me look crazy, and were not in fact me, but the way these investigations work is that you are guilty, and you never get a chance to prove your innocence.

I have seen so many times where they give the signal that I am away from home, which means that they are following someone else somewhere, and this means that if there is an incident, it will be ascribed to me, and it will not be me. I have been on the train and other locations where they have the wrong target, but they are provoking someone else and I have seen the other person react. Yet this will be ascribed to me.

Corrections will never be made, because the target is not allowed any input whatsoever and most of this is based on the word of informants, staged incidents which are designed to make the target look like anything you want them to look like, pedophile, drug dealer, racist, homophone, crazy, you name it, they can stage it.

The other question I have is about the types of psychiatrists or professionals that are being used. Based on what I saw in regards to the articles that they wrote about Gang Stalking online, you have people trying to write a whole entire community off as mentally ill, when in fact these investigations are on going. Then when that does not work, you write them off as extremists or conspiracy theorists. Yet everything that has been stated just about, has been proven, by external sources. If the same types of people are being used to remotely diagnose targets as crazy, we should be very worried.

As it is, they have been investigating me for years. I was never crazy. I was being harassed. Because I choose to stand up for myself and take the company to the commission, HR used it as an opportunity to open an investigation when I failed to comply with the threat of dropping the suit. Since that time, I have been openly harassed, had my communications interfered with, had several staged incidents, some involving me, many not involving me, but all used to further portray me as mentally ill. I have never been allowed to see my file, or directly address any of the said incidents that would be used to portray me as mentally ill.

Normal activity such as handing out activism material has been used to portray me as mentally ill, keep in mind, I have never had anyone tell me that they did not want something being handed to them. So if this is the case, how can an incident be used against me? Further how can said incident be used to further try to disenfranchise me from employment?

What I do know is we have a very corrupt system. Many informants see about 15-30 minutes of skits and harassment that is running in a targets life 24/7. They perform their surveillance. The ones below me, play human target with my body, often using lasers, radar gun, pulse weaponry, what have you to burn my skin from the apartment below. They still try to do the sleep deprivation thing when they can, much of this by a human rights stand point would be considered torture, and against the law.
These people feel that it's ok to perform such actions on targets that they have been told are mentally ill, or rapists, pedophiles, drug dealers, users, prostitutes etc, because these groups are seen as less than human, they don't feel that their actions are immoral, or unethical. They think that what they are doing is just fine.

Lastly again these investigations are the life blood of these programs. I had one person tell me that he was offered a construction job. Person had been sent to befriend me. The construction job was to be the benefit. They hire a lot of these people and they put a lot of money into the area around the target where the surveillance is happening and unfortunately these perks makes a targets community more likely to go along with, and take part in the harassment. Remember for the community doing the harassment/surveillance, they are often having the time of their lives, in some cases. They are working together, some feel like they are James Bond, it's fun for some of them, so fun, that they forget that their is a human being on the other side of the door, as was apparent with the maintenance guy who was so caught up in his role of being informant, that he forgot that the target has rights and the target is not ascribing to their mental pathology.

I have said it before and I will say it again, these people in many cases are not smart, many don't realise that they are being used to set people up and destroy lives. Lives like Jiverly Wong, Kimveer Gill and many others. When the target kills themselves or shoots others, they see it as proof that the target really was mentally ill, and not proof that their harassment drove the target to the end result. They then feel that they did a good job, that they are valuable and relevant and they continue on as before, feeling more justified than ever.

I also suspect that they have the odd staged incident that also further serves to justify the informant network, and the incidents further serve to make them think that what they are doing is valuable and relevant. When I researched the Stasi, many had been a part of the Stasi by choice and not by force and even after the Stasi fell, they did not see a problem with what they had done. In Hitler's Germany it was the same as well, with many enjoying a sense of corporation, neighbourliness, not seeing anything wrong or malignant in their actions, they were just following orders, or the laws of the land. It's the same for our informants.

Thus targets are guilty, we will never be proven innocent because we never get to see our files. The evidence gathered is staged in many cases, normal incidents that would not be questioned if it was done by someone else not under investigation, are being used to further justify their cases against us. When they fail to find proof for one aspect of the investigation, they set up other incidents, go on fishing expeditions and claim the scoop of the investigation has changed. This is used to continue these investigations indefinitely. Remember I recently spent time studying the extremist community, the informants are now trying to set up incidents to portray me as someone that I am not. Think about how this works if you are being investigated as a pedophile. You are likely to get emails containing kiddy porn from you friendly neighbourhood informants, and then the other informant monitoring your internet connection is likely to just focus on the content of that email. Or like the other example that I gave, these groups that you join, or that people add your email to, you have to watch what is being said, because they could use that to change the scope or add to the scope of the investigation.

If you spend anytime reading about how the police are abusing the informant system, then you might begin to have some idea of what we are up against, and then might be able to better protect yourself and others from these deliberate investigations, which have no end, and are continually staged to paint the targets in the worst light, real or imagined.

Is this democracy? No I don't believe it is, but this system has been like this for some time, and as it spreads more are likely to be affected by it, so it's very important that people become aware of how the system is operating and functioning so they can try to avoid some of the pit stops associated with it.

Domestic terrorists. They are amongst us.

Domestic terrorists. They are amongst us.

What does this term really mean?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_terrorism_in_the_United_States

"the unlawful use of force or violence, committed by a group(s) of two or more individuals, against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."[2]
So unlawful use of force or violence. By one more more individuals, against a person, their property to intimidate, or coerce, a civilian population or any segment, to further political or social objectives.

Ladies and Gentlemen, we have domestic terrorist amongst us. They are in use everyday in many democratic countries.

Ruth Goodman

[quote]I am a philosopher/writer who was posting my writings on the Internet for a period of about 5 years, ignoring the online harassment I often received.

I was also contacted at home, in my personal life by a couple of men who work for the government... Brian Kohler, with the D.O.D. (I know this is his real name, I have been to his and his parents home in Fairfax Virginia. His father, Larry Kohler, works for the Pentagon) pretended at first to be in love with me, this was 5 years ago when I was more naive. He flew out to California several times pretending he was going to relocate to move in with me. It turned out that he was lying, and was actually stalking me for counter intelligence. His intimidation kept me from writing on the internet for about a year, but then I went back to doing it, refusing to give in to terrorists.

About a year and a half ago I was contacted by another man, Jason Duncan (not sure if this is his real name) made similar contact with me pretending to be a friend interested in discussing spiritual principles. While at my apartment he staked out the neighborhood, and a couple of months later, stalkers moved into the house behind my balcony, built a HIGH wall, and they gather there harrassing me from behind this wall. After one of Jason's visits with me I became extremely ill (I thought I had food poisening), and was taken to the emergency room closest to my home, very late at night, and was put out with a general anesthetic for 4 hours.

About a day or two later I began to experience people harassing me in my head. I can TELL they are using electronic devices to do so. I do not know where on my body they planted the transmitters, but I have found fake hairs protuding out of the back of my neck and behind my ears. My hairline is not the same as it was before. These tiny hairs come from my temples and go under the skin behind my ears.

These people continue to harrass me in my head, screaming "Stay off the internet" and "we control everything" etc.

They also had me picked up in front of my house by a Long Beach policeman, alone with no name badge, who drugged me, met an LA County sherrif behind a dark building, who was also alone. He got on the freeway. When I asked "where are you taking me?" his response was "someplace fun".

They took me to a secluded section of LA County Jail where I was brutally beaten, stripped naked, fondled and tortured by male sherrifs, and told over again that "we're gonna smoke you, n*gger" while guns were brandished in front of me. I was also repeated drugged with something that made me unable to control myself. I was held for 5 days with no phone call until my sister reported me missing. I was then charged with being under the influence of drugs.
Please help me if you can. I am not sure where to turn. It seems they follow me and make sure that people I talk to are also harrassed.[/quote]

Ruth ofcourse died shortly after these events. What brought me back to these stories is the research that I have been doing into the extremist communities. See the government is trying to sell us the next thing to be afraid of. The domestic terrorist. That lone individual that might go off and commit unforeseen terrorism.

However after researching the extremist community, I realise that we in the Targeted Individual community are already dealing with domestic terrorists and we do so ever single solitary day. The extremist that the government are now trying to see are nothing compared to what we are experiencing. If right wing extremists did the above mentioned things to Ruth Goodman, that the government and it's agents of terror did, she could have gone to the ACLU, and many other organizations to have them investigated and to have the actions against them stopped, but because she was a Targeted Individual, she had no where to turn, and no agency willing to take on her harassers, and eventually she died, under what were listed as unusual circumstances.

Domestic Terrorists use violence and force, to achieve their objectives. As Targeted Individuals we have domestic terrorism being used against us everyday. Many of us do not recognize it as such, but that's what it is, and our governments, and fellow citizens are using this against us.
Force and Violence.

The force and violence being used against us is two fold. First we have physical violence being used against us, such as when the informants are allowed to use electronic means of harassment. Be it lasers, radar guns, electronic weaponry, the rewiring of the electricity in our apartments, directed energy weapons, or what have you, this is using force and violence.

They also use force and violence when they try to hit some of us with their cars, or deliberately assault us, they use violence when they force Targeted Individuals off the road, killing some and injuring others.

Some of the women in the Targeted Individual community have complained about rapes, sexual assaults.

People have said that their children have been harassed at school, even beaten up sometimes.
Targets are routinely baited, by being banged into, and other forms of physical interference, and incitement.

Noxious chemicals are used to make targets sick and ill.

People's animals and pet's have been mutilated, tortured and killed.

Ramona Lopez

http://www.targetedindividuals.com/Forum/showthread.php?tid=135

[quote]"During our investigation, which started more than 10 years ago, we actually found out that law enforcement targets some children in order to get them on drugs or in trouble with the law. It really is a systematic program to keep the drug market profitable as well as a way to destroy whole families and communities."

Although Mrs. Lopez is still fighting for justice in her southern California community with other like minded citizens, she has been a target along with her family members, the target of extreme government abuse, including death threats, assaults, drive-by gun shootings, gang stalking, breaking and entering, drugged after being assaulted in her home with needles, micro-chipped by assailants and the victim of continuous electronic weaponry.

Not only has Lopez been targeted by covert operatives, but so has her children, as well as her five-year- old grand daughter, who has been micro-chipped in the same manner as Flores.
"I have taken my case to the highest authorities, but nothing ever happens and the abuse continues even to this day," said Lopez, who said all she ever wanted to do was to help children in her community stay in school and lead a more productive lives. "I have had numerous chips removed by doctors, chips acting as conductors so the electrical impulses they use have a more sever and devastating effect."

"When the harassment first started years ago, they attacked me with needles in my bedroom. I remember getting up the next morning with needle marks all over my body. I then found out I was micro-chipped. There have been times I get hit so hard with the impulses I feel like I am going to die from a heart attack. These people need to be stopped because I am not the only one around the country going being attacked like this. I have talked to others like me and it is a pattern of abuse and harassment being used all over the country. If they would even do this to my grand daughter, do you think they would hesitate doing it to you?"

Although Mrs. Lopez has been attacked and violated on almost every level, she still is seeking fighting to make her community a better place to live, becoming one of the more well-known figures ion the community as well as receiving several community leadership awards.[/quote]
Ramona Lopez was an innocent woman who wanted to get drugs off the streets and help her community. For that she was Gang raped in her home, micro chipped, set up for drugs, has experienced Gang Stalking, her very innocent and young grand daughter who was five years old at the time has been micro chipped and harassed. Drive by shootings, intimidation, often times by the police? Does this sound right to you?

If this stuff had gone on in the American south during slavery, there would have been some help, some kind of community to turn to, but because this is being done by the state, there is very little help or assistance. But this is true domestic terrorism. Again if extremists were the ones perpetrating this against Romana Lopez, this would have been stopped a long time ago, and there would have been an outcry, but because these acts of domestic terrorism are being committed by the state, and agents of the state, there is no help for her, and the harassment has continued.

Because Gang Stalking is often multi-generational, you see that her grand daughter had already become a target, and will most likely be targeted. If this was being done by extremist to a family decade after decade, by now there would be an outcry, but there has not been.

These people might not be burning crosses on lawns, wearing hoods, but in my opinion is the actions being committed are 10 times worst, because at least society if such actions as crosses being burnt were committed, society would see it for what it is, but in our cases, the crimes being committed against us are sanctions and carried out by the state, our neighbours and communities and they often do not see the problems with what is being done to us.

http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1239780728

[quote]
I want to share some details of my experience with gangstalking. This is going to sound unbelievable, but please bear with me.

The worst experience I've had so far is discovering that someone somehow came into my home while I was away and contaminated my 11 year old son's insulin bottles. He was just diagnosed about a year and a half ago with type I diabetes. Anyway, I had been keeping track of the amount of insulin in the bottles, so it was obvious that they had been tampered with when the volume of liquid in the bottles suddenly doubled within a few hours on the same day. It appeared like someone had added water or some other clear liquid to the insulin, rendering it unusable.[/quote]

Had the mother failed to notice this descrepancy, we do not know what would have happened to her child, and there is no way to tell what the extra added liquid was.


Psychological force and violence.

Targets are often stalked. They have false rumours spread about them. Such as being pedophiles, rapists, etc. These rumours leave targets open to physical violence, or assaults.
Targets are often stalked by their community at large, for years at a time even though they are innocent in many cases.

Targets are called names, their privacy is invaded.

Officials such as police and fire fighters are also used as part of the campaign of psychological violence, in some cases to intimidate targets.

They are at times blacklisted because of falsely being labelled.

Their livelihoods are interfered with.

These are a small sample of what targets go through and experience.

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2007/07/361691.shtml

[quote]

FBI surveillance of my son
My son's account of being relentlessly dogged by the FBI and local law enforcement agents. He and his friend, Kyle, built a model rocket out of boredom one day, as they had learned to do a middle school class years earlier.

Eli endured extreme mental distress during the period of surveillance, as did Kyle. We feel the stress contributed to Kyle's suicide on 7/2/06.

EliIn 2005 my residence was entered by two Federal Bureau of Investigations agents and a North Bend Police Officer. Federal Agent William Soulle and FBI Bomb Technician John Hallock, accompanied by Officer Jeff Bohannen, entered my residence and seized several computers, books, papers, scraps of plastic, paint, glue and other miscellaneous items which were related to what they called an "imminent terrorist threat" and would be used to "determine the intent" of the device I will mention in a moment. This would be the beginning of a five-month long investigation which would include FBI tails, line-taps, surveillance, and in one scenario, being stopped early one morning at an improvised roadblock on a rural road.

So, what did I do to earn the scorn of the Federal Bureau of Investigations?

My friend and I, out of boredom, constructed a device to launch a model rocket. A model-rocket-launcher if you will. According to the FBI, however, we had constructed a lethal and highly-illegal device similar to what was being produced by insurgents in Iraq. News of our "Improvised Anti-Personnel Weapon" (IAW), we would find out, would make it all the way to Washington D.C., to both an anti-terrorist task force at the Pentagon as well as to the desk of the President of the United States of America.

It quickly became apparent that we were in a situation with the U.S. Government that had the potential to be highly-volatile, that could end in arrest and detention in undisclosed locations, or worse.

But, how did it get to this point?

The day Kyle and I finished the device, we decided to test-fire it in what we perceived to be a safe location in the nearby area. The location was ideal. It was on a dirt lot away from any property or timber that could be damaged, an area I had practiced target shooting with my bow years prior. It was an area that a lot of local kids, like I had done, visited frequently to light off firecrackers and shoot slingshots without getting into huge trouble or burning something down.
Kyle and I put the launcher into the cab of my Ford Ranger and, followed by my father (who decided to come along to take pictures), headed to the area which was located just down the road from our house. As we pulled into the lot, the ignition switch was touched somehow and the rocket ignited in the truck, filling the cab with smoke, resembling a particular scene from a Cheech & Chong movie. No damage done. At that exact moment, however, a squad car pulled in behind us and turned his lights on.

My truck was searched, the launcher was seized and given over to the State Police. From there, it was handed over to the FBI in Salem. Little did we know, the property I had been visiting for years was newly-acquired airport property. Now it was a matter of National Security, a matter which would produce search warrants and affidavits issued by the U.S. Department of State, and would begin long and far-reaching federal investigations against all three of us.

During that time I was tailed everywhere I went, my phones were tapped, my mother's phones were tapped, Kyle's phones were tapped and my father's phones were tapped. I was followed in the local area, tailed by unmarked cars as well as police, and even followed on several trips to a location three hours south of my hometown. My email accounts were being obviously monitored and about once a day emails would go missing and reappear, or I would be unable to login to any of my accounts during short periods of time throughout the day. The FBI was not making any attempt to conceal their surveillance measures. I almost completely stopped using phones and e-mail, and rarely strayed from preset courses when traveling in an attempt to identify surveillance vehicles. A word of advice to anyone under investigation...everything is surveillance.
Fear ruled my life. I stopped sleeping, I stopped talking, I stopped traveling. I started listening, watching and making note of everything--trusting nothing and nobody. If it looked like a trick, it was...and there was nothing I could do to stop it, so I just had to live with it.

Since that time I've been afraid to say anything at all. I know that within the borders of this country, if you are intelligent and eloquent, you are to be considered extremely dangerous.
It is after much consideration that I've decided to start this blog in hope of sharing things which are of interest to me with others and creating an open forum where these things can be discussed and where our ideas can be shared.
[/quote]

In this case you might think that they deserved the harassment because they built a simple rocket, but think about your own children, and families and what simple actions could start and investigation? Most times all it takes is the word of an informant, or you standing up for and asserting your rights.

Committed by a group(s) of two or more individuals

The domestic terrorism is carried out by many people. Often these people who are committing these acts are informants. Some are also criminals who are used to commit illegal acts, actions on targets, with the blessing of their handlers. Some are hardcore criminals who are used to rape, or assault, kill, main, or hurt a target, their children or their pets. Many informants would be alarmed or even horrified if they knew about this aspect of the targeting and the true nature of what they were taking part in, but unfortunately because they work as a team with these perpetrators for the state, they are just as culpable and guilty of domestic terrorism as the true fiends, who commit a lot of the deplorable actions.

http://www.oneagleswingsfearnoevil.com/

[quote]
My life soon paralleled a Hollywood movie: Enemy of the State was a film released in 1998 starring theactor, Will Smith. Billed as a thriller, it was the story of a young successful lawyer whose life was thrustinto turmoil when he stumbled upon information that could implicate some high-level governmentofficials. The story could have been ripped from the pages of my life as I stumbled into the politicalcorruption in North Carolina politics. I wandered blindly into a system beset with the theft of federalblock grant money, police brutality, and child abuse. Hollywood hails the lives of corporate whistleblowers such as Erin Brockovich, Norma Rae, and Jeffrey Wigand. They are cast as heroes, but there areno Hollywood heroes among the thousands of political whistle blowers who suffer retaliation, threats,intimidation, harassment, and financial hardship on a daily basis. And the Supreme Court's decision lastyear that disallows whistle blowing as a protection under the First Amendment, Freedom of Speech, willsucceed in dis incentives for Americans to speak-up, when the purest act of patriotism is protecting ournation from crimes against humanity, corruption, and government waste. Democracies die behind closeddoors, and yet, most whistle blowers pay dearly for their candor at the hands of governmental agenciesthat were established to protect them. At sixty-two years old, I was falsely arrested with my handscuffed behind my back, and tossed into the back of a patrol car with the orders to"slide your fannyover."

The acts of retaliation and harassment against whistle blowers have become so wide spread that someof the individuals have organized. The organization is known as TI for targeted individuals. Our numbersare in the hundreds of thousands. We are activist, whistle blowers, and honest American citizens wholove this country and are determined to bring attention to this cancer on our democracy. Our web pagewill soon bear the names and stories of the thousands of "Targeted Individuals." Most , but no all, areeducated blacks and whites who fight for justice for the poor, the elderly, and the youth.

Following my false arrest, I sought help from the Justice Department, the NAACP, my Senators, theACLU and the FBI. I sent certified letters to Mr. Mueller at the FBI and to Mr. Gonzales at the JusticeDepartment at least three times each and never received a response. I am sure that those letters werenever delivered.I traveled to the Justice Department to see the case manager who had found "cause" topursue my false arrest case. In Washington, DC, I was denied access to the building by armed guards. AFlorida senator finally responded to my letter and required the FBI to talk to me. Agent John Rowancalled me quite concerned about my situation, and we made an appointment to meet. When I arrived formy appointment, Agent Rowan was not available, instead, I met with Agent Griffin who promised to help.I never heard another word. Agent Taylor in the Wilmington office of the FBI sat across from me with asmirk on his face and announced that the "FBI is not going to investigate this case," even though an FBIspokesman remarked, "the FBI thoroughly investigates all allegations of wrongdoing."

My book, "Sadly, My Eyes Were Opened" is being written to encourage the thousands of whistle blowers,who have been abandoned by government and public apathy, that they are not alone. When the word"whistle blower" is "Goggled," the site reveals over one million, six hundred thousand hits.[/quote]

Targeted by police, and other political figures. She exposed corruption and child sexual abuse, but was targeted for her efforts and became a Targeted Individual. Her successful political and business career were both destroyed as a result. She also says that her children's careers are being interfered with as a result of the mobbing she has experienced. If society found out that a group of extremists were running a child pedophile ring, there would likely be an investigation and they would be demonized accordingly, but in many of these cases that I came across, the perpetrators, move forward, and their victims and those who would blow the whistle are the one's that suffer, and I have to ask myself, why is it like this? Why is it wrong if one group commits these actions, but society ignores, covers up, participates, when it's being conducted by the state?

Political or social objectives

In this case the political and social objectives that are being achieved vary, sometimes it's to silence a target. Eg. Many employers are having these investigations opened on employers that will not be silence, whistle blowers.

Sometimes these tactics are used on individuals that do not fit the status quo, and so therefore it's used to get them to fall in line.

These physical and psychological means work together to achieve the same ends.
We have domestic terrorists amongst us, and in many cases they are those who are working for what they believe is a worthy cause, but in many cases, it's just domestic terrorism disguised as working towards a worthy cause on innocent individuals.

http://www.gangstalkingworld.com/Social/article.php?sid=69

Anita Belle

[quote]
A Florida attorney suing the federal government alleged that seven car accidents occurring on or around her court deadlines were deliberately staged counter-intelligence program (COINTELPRO) murder attempts. When the U.S. Supreme Court upheld federal appellate rulings that the alleged COINTELPRO was frivolous, the attorney sought political asylum in Canada. Then, despite undisputed evidence of being disbarred from practicing law without due process, the high court upheld the Florida Supreme Courts ruling that disbarred the whistle-blowing attorney.

Anita E. Belle, a black female practicing law in Florida, alleged that COINTELPRO reared its ugly head against her after she filed cases on behalf of blacks and whites in seven states harmed due to the Central Intelligence Agency or CIAs role in importing illegal drugs into black communities. She alleged that at least one reputed CIA agent admitted the agency conspired with organized crime to use illegal drugs as a means of pharmaceutically enslaving African-Americans. In early 2000, five of her seven cases were consolidated as the Nicaraguan Contras Narcotics Trafficking Litigation, MDL 1331, in the federal court in Gainesville, Florida.

Belle claims that the cases became so sabotaged that she and her family were forced to flee Florida in fear of their lives. She first moved to North Carolina, but left there after witnesses in the CIA cases were threatened. She then returned to her hometown of Detroit, Michigan.
[/quote]

She was just a lawyer trying to protect the rights of people who had been enslaved, due to drugs being deliberately brought into their communities, by their own government. For her efforts, her life was ruined, her career destroyed, her children were targeted, she fled from state to state, then to Canada, and finally to Israel. This is the true definition of domestic terrorism, and it happens every day to Targeted Individuals.

If an extremist group did half the things that were done to Anita Belle, they would likely be in jail, or under investigation. There would have been some kind of outcry, but because those carrying out the actions were of the state, she was ignored, and the terrorism used against her allowed to continue.

These incidents are not limited, they happen across a wide spectrum and many companies are using these investigations, to destroy employees. Lauren Moret, came across over 500 women, and minority that were being targeted this way by just one company.

[quote]Lauren Moret called it, and what we call it. As I approached the gate with my office belongings piled in my car, I felt an incredible lightness of being. I dropped off my badge and beeper and got back in my car, laughing and thinking, “You just got out of jail!” Little did I know what was ahead. The next 10 years were the darkest of my life and I am lucky to be alive today. My great-est gift was the discovery of my inner strength to be able to survive the retaliation, mobbing and harassment by the Livermore Lab, the University of California and the Oakland police department. Prophetically, an acquaintance coolly said to me a year after I left the lab,

“You are in a police net you will never get out of … for the rest of your life.” She was right, but I no longer care because now I am not afraid.

We are controlled by our fears until we have none left, and that happens when there is nothing left to lose. The journey to that realization took 12 years of pain, a sense of loss and humiliation, a feeling of abandonment and the lifelong emptiness and absence of being loved—not by any-one, not at any time. The experience and purpose of being mobbed, and what I did not knowin the isolation of the experience, is that I was not alone.“Mobbing” is the purposeful and strategic institutional gathering of all information about an individual by using any method—legal or illegal.

Contact for this purpose is made with neighbors, classmates, former partners, family members, former employers, teachers, church members, good friends and even your family tree … everything must be known about the support system around you that makes your life possible. The assessment of strategic resources and future income (finances, mobility, cars, insur-ance, credit cards, bank safety deposit boxes, post office boxes, wills, health records, birth
Page 3 Uncovering the Truth About Depleted Uranium49certificates, transcripts and photographs) is made without your knowledge. The purpose ofmobbing is to drive the target individual out of the job force for the rest of their life; the big-ger goal is to drive them to the ultimate self-destruction: suicide.

There are now laws made by European unions to prevent this cancer on society and productivity, but it is practically unknown in the U.S.The University of California, which had contributed so much to the State of California and to the global community through the benefits of education, had become a pathologi-cally dysfunctional institution through its mobbing practices.

I learned that more than 500 women and minorities had filed lawsuits against the University of California and had then experienced retaliation by the University of California apparatus of mobbing by employees, alumni and law enforcement.1The lawsuits were for denial of tenure, whistleblower retaliation and theft of intel-lectual property. These women had similar complaints about the destruction of their own lives and careers. The information gathered by the University of California is used to takeyour life apart; to destroy all that makes you feel safe; to bankrupt, isolate and alienate you from society and from yourself; and to attempt to make you look crazy.

Your children are harassed, they come home with belongings missing and stories of teachers harassing them and a weirdness takes over your lives. Slowly, documents disappeared from my house; porncharges appeared on my credit card; files, my purse and my keys disappeared; mail was lost. I was forced to carry my documents with me at all times. All of my university transcripts and diplomas have been stolen from my house.Two things kept me going and kept me alive. First, the warrior mother spirit guided me to protect Zephyr. That miracle of life taught me what it means to love unconditionally and completely. I began to learn to love myself. Second, my uncle had told me long ago, “No one can destroy you. Only you can destroy yourself.” [/quote]

Again if an extremist group was going these actions, it would be exposed for what it is. Yet this practice continues in society, endorsed, and encouraged.

As Targeted Individuals we are harassed, degraded, tortured, humiliated, violated, interfered with on a daily bases. The actions of our perpetrators are monstrous, and they are indeed domestic terrorists, but because their actions are sanctioned by the state, our terrorism goes ignored. Those organisations that would be all over our targeting if it was being done by an extremist group, sit silently by and ignore and thus silently sanction what is happening to us.
Domestic Terrorism is happening in our countries, it's happening everyday. It's happening to you and to me. Do you think that it's not your problem?

Remember that these acts of domestic terrorism often lead to acts of violence. If you have not been paying attention to the names in the news, several of the shooters over the last several years, have been those who were under investigation, who could not take their targeting anymore and thus took it out on members of society, who were apathetic to their suffering.


Kimveer Gill

http://crimene.ws/2006/09/14/the-blogroll-on-kimveer-gill/comment-page-1/

[quote]Page 2 of Kimveer Gill’s “fatality666 journal was a little more telling. He seemed to jot things down online, short entries, thoughts posted in passing.
He posted the following in separate entries dated September 12, 2006:

"Stop Bullying
It’s not only the bully’s fault you know!! It’s the teachers and principals fault for turning a blind eye, just cuz it’s not their job. You fuckers are pathetic. It’s the police’s fault for not doing anything when people conplain (oops, my mistake, the cops are corrupt sons of whores, so it’s not like they can do anything about it.)

FUCK THE POLICE

It’s society’s fault for acting like it’s normal for people to be assholes to each other. Society disgusts me. It’s everyone’s fault for being so apathetic towards fucking everything that doesn’t affect them personally. FUCK YOU SOCIETY."

"I wonder why my household has been under surveillance by law enforcement for 6 years now? Makes no sense to me!!"
[/quote]

As some will remember Kimveer is now known for the Dawson College shooting. If you go back however and you learn about Kimveer, many people describe him originally as a sweet and quite boy, this did not come about over night. The changes that lead to the shooting were created, and in time he became a killer, but his history does not show that he was this personality type, till driven to these actions, in my opinion, based on much of the research that I have done into this shooting, and this shooter.

Jiverly Wong

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/jiverly-wong-two-sides/
http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/04/09/jiverly-wong-letter-from-a-ti-perspective/

[quote]The first I want to say sorry I know a little English. I hope you understand all of this. Of course you need to know why I shooting? Because undercover cop gave me a lot of ass during eighteen years I got seven years and eight month delivery to grocery in the California came back New York on the August 2007. [/quote]

[quote]Let talk about when I live in California. Such as…cop used 24 hours the technique of ultramodern and camera for burn the chemical in my house. For switch the channel time…For adjust the fan. For made me unbreathable. For made me vomit. For connect the music into my ear.
[/quote]

[quote]Undercover cop usual coined some nasty was not true about me and spread a rumour to the receiver and some people know me conduce toward many people predudiced and selfish to me…cop made me lost my job…cop put me became poor. [/quote]

[quote]Let talk about when I live at the 28 Baker St. 2nd Floor, Johnson City, New York 13790.
It terrible when I live there such as…cop wait until midnight when I off the light and went to the bed. Cop unlock my door and came in take a sit in my room ((cop did it thirteen time on the year 1994 )) on the thirteen time had three time touch me when I sleeping. One time stolen 20 dollar in my wallet. One time used electric gun shoot at the behind my neck. (That time I did not know English) [/quote]

What Mr Wong described was close to 20 years of Rumors, slander, lies, provocations, and harassment often by the very people expected to be protecting him.

He spoke of rumours, those same rumours about a bank robbery, him being a drug addict, a
loser who lost his jobs, divorced, etc. When I looked into these stories I found that they were not true. There was no bank robbery, but an informant had said he had a drug problem and was going to rob a bank. They spoke of his divorce, but his own parents knew nothing of him ever being married. He had not been fired from either of his job, but these were the rumours and slander that were left to hang in the air about him after his death.

The rumours had been supplied to the papers by the very police he claimed had been stalking him for close to 20 years. If you are familiar with the techniques used on targets when they are under surveillance, you can read the translation of his letter here, and see that he was very clearly trying to tell us what had been happening to him.

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/04/09/jiverly-wong-letter-from-a-ti-perspective/
http://gangstalkingworld.com/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1239097055

Where was society to make the corrections after his death? Instead even into his death the lies and rumours were allowed to persist. Society took no responsibility for the terror that they helped create. He experienced domestic terrorism for close to 20 years, and then finally snapped, and we saw the end result of this in his shooting of all those people, but nothing is getting done to stop these investigations, they are ongoing and worst than ever.

People are being targeted for being Ron Paul supporters, or even for their conspiracy views. Where are the guidelines, where are the agencies to stop these tortures and these abuses from happening? These terrorists in many cases are being manufactured, to incite fear, to justify the existence of these programs, yet where are the agencies to put this type of domestic terrorism in it's place?

Keith deRoux

http://gangstalking.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/droege-the-right-and-the-system-in-between/

[quote]Friday said the 44-year-old Deroux’s cocaine addiction was fuelling ‘paranoid delusions’ that listening devices and cameras had been placed in his apartment. The drug addict believed someone was sending him coded messages through his computer and, even after moving to a new residence, Deroux feared people were entering his house through an underground tunnel and funnelling “noxious gases” into the residence. The only person with enough resources for this kind of surveillance, Deroux figured, was his friend and cocaine dealer, Wolfgang Droege. … [/quote]

These killings are happening all over the place, and what is behind them in many cases are the same things. Yet we have a complacent media that just writes of these complaints as paranoia, or crazy.

The ACLU now admits these types of investigations are ongoing, but still there is no responsible agency to curtail what is happening.

http://blog.aclu.org/2009/04/30/mass-con-fusion/#more-5320

[quote]
"You mean to tell me that it is legal for corporations from the private sector to team up with local law enforcement officials in efforts to spy on innocent members of our society? You also mean to tell me that the synthesis of law enforcement authority and the drive of for-profit companies operate under little to no guidelines or restrictions and it is unclear to whom they are responsible to?"
[/quote]

Targets are still being victimized day in day out. Yet we are being told to fear extremists? As a Targeted Individual, I personally find the actions of these people, these informants to be far more frightening, abhorrent, and deplorable, considering who they are acting on behalf of.
As it is, we must fight this brand of Domestic Terrorism on our own, we must raise our own brand of awareness, fight our own battles, and keep telling our stories of what is happening, day in day out. Only we have the power to help ourselves, and it's clear that we must, because no responsible agency is going to step in and do it, and our fellow citizens have failed to realise that this is what they should really be looking out for, this invisible, yet truly lethal and insidious brand of domestic terrorism that they are not told about, or warned about.

Domestic Terrorists are amongst us, but they are not often the ones that the state would like us to believe.

If you want to read more about Gang Stalking, or would like to learn more, you can now purchase Bridging The Gap, which is available at Amazon.com and it's a nice introduction. Share the book with friends or family.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/1441448845