Gang Stalking

A upto date blog about my adventures with gangstalking. This is my way of sharing with the world what gang stalking is really like. Some helpful books. Gang Stalking Books Mobbing Books

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Jane Clift Case Highlights

Jane Clift Case Highlights

This case is great. She was placed on a list. She used the Data Protection Act and Human Rights Act to sue and win her case.

6# The words complained of contain personal information relating to Ms Clift. That is data which is subject to the Data Protection Act 1998 ("DPA"). This Act implemented in English law some of the rights recognised by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights ("the Convention"). Later those rights were more fully incorporated into English law by the Human Rights Act 1998 ("HRA"). The Council is a public authority. HRA s.6 (1) provides:

"It is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention Right".

Physical Contact. This is an area that some targets might be able to build a case on, in regards to who was given access to their data.

Data Protection Act. Human Rights Act. These are the two acts that she was able to use to file her case.

8# The question in this case is whether, and if so how, the Council must demonstrate that it has complied with its public law duties under HRA (and incidentally DPA) if it is to be able to assert that it has the interest or duty required at common law for there to be a defence of qualified privilege.

This is what the case came down to. The same would likely be true for the Acts in other countries.


9# As a responsible employer the Council has a policy to protect its employees from violence at work. The policy is set out in a document headed "Safe System of Work (Codes of Practice) H&NS/COP/1.14 Version 1.0 date issued 11/3/03 Violence at Work (Inc Potentially Violent Persons)" ("the Policy").

This also fell under Violence at Work

15# Mr Kelleher then conducted a number of other interviews. One was with Mr Gulfraz, a friend of Ms Clift. She was accustomed to helping him in making telephone calls and filling out official forms. She was at the time also helping him in a complaint he was making against the Council on a housing matter. He was present at the time Ms Clift made her call to Ms Rashid on 11 August. He heard the whole conversation over the speaker phone. Other witnesses were fellow employees of Ms Rashid. Ms Rashid did not have the phone on loud speaker but her colleagues sitting near her heard her side of the conversation. It was sufficiently unusual to attract their attention.

Witness close to Jane Clift were interviewed. Just like witnesses, family, friends, would be interviewed.

21# Also on 1 December 2005 Mr Kelleher filled out a standard form prepared in accordance with the Policy. It is known as a Violent Incident Report Form.

Same type of reporting form used in other countries as well to document incidents.

22# Mr Satterthwaite is the author of the Policy and the officer of the Council responsible for compliance with Data Protection and other related matters. He maintains the Register. It is a document prepared on Excel spreadsheet software. It contained ten columns and, at the relevant time, about 150 rows. Each row related to a person identified by name and address given in the first two columns. Ms Clift's name was entered on the Register by Mr Satterthwaite upon information provided by Mr Kelleher. Details of the incident are given in column 5 as "threatening behaviour on several occasions". The duration for which the person is to remain on the register is given in column 8 and in respect of Ms Clift the period is 18 months. The ninth column contains a title "Risk Rating VH, H, M and L" the entry for Ms Clift is M for medium. Two entries are admittedly inaccurate. The location of the incident is given at column 4 as "via correspondence". The date of the incident is given in column 6 as "30/11/2005".

All your information get's documented.

24# The precise means by which the Register was circulated did not emerge clearly in evidence. Ms Clift protested immediately at her inclusion on the Register and asked if there was a right of appeal. She was informed there was not. In a letter dated 13 December 2005 Mr Satterthwaite (signing himself as Data Protection/ Health and Safety Co-ordinator) explained his decision in terms which implied that the Register had already been circulated by that date, as might be expected. Some information as to whom the Register had been shared with was given in that letter. More detailed information as to the publishees is not recorded in the form of an email before one that has survived dated 27 January 2006.

Health and Safety Co-ordinator did not give her the chance to appeal, so she took it to court.

30# The letter dated 13 December 2005 from Mr Satterthwaite to Ms Clift includes the following:

"Re – your letter dated 10 December 2005 – PVP Marker

A request for information that you sent to the Council, has been passed to me to answer, as I am the Data Controller for the PVP register.

Under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations (1992), we have a duty of care to ensure that we do not put our employees into situations that may cause them physical or mental harm…

This register is shared between the Council's Health and Safety co-ordinators to distribute on a need to know basis to managers, (especially those services that interface with our customers) so they can take the appropriate actions to protect their staff. This register is also sent to our partner organisations that may provide a service on our behalf (i.e. Slough Accord, Interserve, NHS Primary Care Trust and The Community Safety Partnership). Once the time limit has expired, using the same communication chain, a request is made that all traces of the warning marker is removed from the individual's name.

This is what get's distributed, and this is the same wording in most of the documents that I have been reading up on.

31# That letter reflects guidance from two sources. Whether it does so correctly is another matter. The first source is the Policy. This includes what, in another context, would be called sentencing guidelines, listing the activities that may render a person liable to have a violent person marker placed on their file and the "set period" said to be commensurate with the activity. The second document is one issued by the Information Commissioner covering five pages, entitled "Data Protection Act 1998 Compliance advice Violent Warning Markers: used in the public sector" ("the Compliance Advice").

32# Ms Clift pursued her rights of access and sought further information under the Data Protection Act. By a letter dated 11 January 2006 Mr Satterthwaite wrote as follows:…..

Mainly social services related activities – Supporting People, Community Mental Health Team and Community Nursing

– Community Safety Partnership

Neighbourhood Wardens

Disclosure was made to the above organisations as they may all have cause to visit your address, for face to face contact. A good example of this is one of the many satisfaction surveys carried out.

She wrote the request under the Data Protection Act. Note her file was shared and distributed to quite a few people.

42# After further submissions on the questions to be asked of the jury counsel agreed that I should direct them as follows:

"If you assess damages, then you take into account circulation to 30 people for the e-mail and 150 for the Register. You leave out of account the remainder of the 66 to whom the e-mail was addressed unless you answer question 2 yes [in other words unless they find malice].

If you answer yes to question 2, you take into account all 66 people to whom the e-mail was sent and 150 for the Register".


These two acts played heavily into her defense.

43# The first proceedings brought by Ms Clift were in the County Court under the DPA. She commenced those proceedings on 13 January 2006 alleging that the Register was inaccurate. Those proceedings have been stayed to await the outcome of this libel action.

This is what Jane Clift had to do to clear her record.

(a) The widespread publication of information that a person is 'violent' and their inclusion on a register of 'violent persons' is a serious interference with that persons Article 8 rights which requires cogent justification.

(b) Ms Clift had never used violence towards the First Defendant's employees and had never threatened any such employee with violence. No employee had complained about Ms Clift's conduct and no contemporaneous 'Violent Incident Report' relating to Ms Clift had been completed by any person.

Point 46. interference with a persons Article 8 rights.

47# There followed a plea of malice which is summarised in para 2 above. The plea of publication set out the facts I have already recited in relation to the circulation of the e-mail with the Register as an attachment on 27 January 2006. The next paragraph material to be cited reads as follows:

"10 The Register entry and the e-mail were distributed excessively widely to persons and bodies with whom [Ms Clift] had no contact and had no interest in [Ms Clift].

When I have no contact with individuals across boarders, why is my information shared with them? Clients or associates in other countries should not have this information disseminated, but they are.

50# Nevertheless, it is appropriate to set out the terms of the draft amendment as follows:

"12A Further by publishing the e-mail and the Register Entry the [Council] has interfered with [Ms Clift]'s rights under Article 8 (1) of the European Convention on Human Rights without such interference being justified under Article 8 (2) and as a result its actions were unlawful under Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998.

The targets in European countries could start to look into this via data protection and Human Rights Conventions, Articles 8 and 6. See a lawyer first.

66# It is understandable that Mr Beggs should have ordered his arguments as he did. The Council has policies on both health and safety, and on data protection. Mr Kelleher and Mr Satterthwaite made the decisions they did make after considering these policies. Mr Satterthwaite directed himself on the law of health and safety at work, and on data protection, as set out in the Policy and the Compliance Advice. He did not mention the law of libel. Whether or not Mr Satterthwaite directed himself correctly is an issue for the court. But it is understandable that the Defendants should wish to be judged by the law which they understood to be applicable. Mr Beggs may also have taken the view that the course I adopted in the Westminster case at para 151 would be difficult to support. If so, he did not say that.

Health and Safety at work.

75# Mr Beggs submitted that the Council owed a duty to ensure the safety of their staff. He cited Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 ss.2 and 3 and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/3242), in particular regulations 3-5 and Schedule 1.

Health and Safety consistently cited throughout this whole case, used for justification.

90# The absence of a system of monitoring to whom the Register was published means that the Claimant may not be able to prove the full extent of the publication. The onus of proof is upon her, and if she is unable to discharge it, that cannot be relevant to the defence of qualified privilege that might be available in respect of other publications which she can prove.

A disgraceful lack of oversight is what I like to call it.

94# Para 16 provides that:

"Data controllers should ensure that only those members of staff who are likely to come into physical contact with a potentially violent individual, through visits or by meeting in open plan reception areas, or who can otherwise demonstrate a need to know, have access to violent warning marker information. So for example where a member of staff is required to visit a potentially violent individual, at this point they should be advised of this fact".

Physical contact. There is that word again.

98# The Compliance Advice does not assist on the definition of violence or violent behaviour. The Policy gives what it states are "Examples of violent behaviour covered by the Code of Practice". They include: "Shouting, Swearing, Racial / Sexual Abuse, Threats, Pushing, Spitting, Object Thrown, Damage, Hostage and Actual Violence". These are all things which an employee should expect to be protected from. But to refer to them all as examples of violence, or even potential violence, gives an extended definition of that word. It normally connotes at least a threat of physical force, and one which is meant seriously.

An expanded definition of violence. So shouting by someone's standards could get you and did help to get Jane Clift on the list. You have to be so very careful with these individuals.

109# Documents are now normally held and communicated electronically. It is easy and common to circulate by e-mail to very large numbers of people, within (and outside) an organisation, information which, in the past, would have been addressed in a letter or memo to very few. It is therefore much more likely than in the past that information will be communicated to persons to whom no duty is owed, or who do not have a legally sufficient interest in receiving the information. It was in order to address this change in practice that the data protection legislation was introduced, first in a limited form in 1984, and then as it is now in DPA. HRA was not specifically targeted at this issue, but it undoubtedly applies to it.

How far and wide is information getting shared? This is going to be an interesting question to look into. I get the feeling with limited oversight, they are using this to smear targets left, right and center.

112# The historical cases show that the values set down in the Convention in 1950 as rights under Articles 8 (including the right to reputation) and Article 10 (including the right of freedom of expression in the giving of references and warnings) were not invented in 1950. These and some other Convention rights can be traced back, not only to the American Bill of Rights and the French Declaration in the eighteenth century, but also to the very beginnings of English law. So one thing that HRA has achieved is to provide a means through which the courts can review the relative priority that the common law gave to those rights (which it already recognised), and adjust those priorities to meet contemporary needs.

This case was very interesting. Lot's of good points, targets might be able to use. Check with a legal expert.


On the one hand looms the probability, often amounting to a certainty, of damage to the individual, which in some cases will be serious and may indeed be irreparable. The entire future prosperity and happiness of someone who is the subject of a damaging reference which is given carelessly but in perfectly good faith may be irretrievably blighted. Against this prospect is set the possibility that some referees will be deterred from giving frank references or indeed any references."

Yes slander can ruin your life.

120# The DPA has created new statutory rights which are in no way related to employment or other relationships, although they affect such relationships. That Act requires attention to be focussed on the rights of those who are the subjects of references and warnings, as well as on the rights of those to whom the references and warnings are addressed. Personal data must be processed (which includes disclosed) "fairly and lawfully", and it must be accurate: see Sch I. There are extensive provisions on the interpretation of these and other principles and a number of statutory instruments containing further provisions. I shall not consider these further, because Mr Tomlinson made no submission based upon them. He confined his submissions to the new rights and duties created by the HRA, which apply to the defendant council, but would not apply directly to a private sector employer.

Wow you mean people can't just create fake incidents, data must be accurate? Guess it's time to start reviewing some files and see what is actually out there. What has been said, attributed to individual files vs what is accurate. There has to be a way to do a class action for inaccurate information, especially if there is a systemic practice that is occurring.

128# The jury answered No to each of the first three questions: they rejected the defence of justification and the allegation of malice. They awarded damages of £12,000 to Ms Clift. So, Ms Clift left court with her reputation vindicated and Mr Kelleher left court without a stain on his reputation.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, March 27, 2010

What on earth did I get myself into?

It all depends on who you ask, and how you interpret the situation. Sometimes the answer is blowing in the wind.

I had such a moment a few weeks ago on some level, and at first my only thought was how do I untangle myself, but the more I watched and waited for the punchline, the punchline never came. Where I was on some level was surprisingly where I was meant to be. It really started to work for me, and much to my complete surprise, really lifted my spirits.

Now upon realising that I was in a good place, the usual control agents have done just about everything to try to change or destroy that.

This week has been a challenge, but I am trying to find that peace and happy I knew just a few short weeks ago.

I find that when you are in the right place, you can not let specific negative elements allow you to be brought low.

I think the question of what on earth did I get myself into at times has to be answered in spirit for truth, but in flesh for accuracy, cause otherwise it's just too easy to get the lines of communications mixed up, or cluttered with a lot of inaccurate information.

I think targets ask this question a lot, but much like the disinformation that is out there about us, some information can only be clarified by going to or getting at the source.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Gang Stalking Redefined

What is Gang Stalking?

Gang Stalking is a systemic form of control, which seeks to destroy every aspect of a Targeted Individuals life. Once a target is flagged a notification is sent out to the community at large, and the target is followed around 24/7 by the various communities that they are in.

The community notifications will go out to various places. Apartment rentals, future employers, stores and communities where the target visits, will be notified. Doctors offices, fire departments, police, etc. A covert investigation might also be opened, and electronic, means used by the civilian spies/snitches as part of the overt and covert monitoring and surveillance process.

Individuals can be flagged designating them as having a history of aggressive or inappropriate behavior. This notification system will follow the target if they move, change jobs, visit other areas. It let's the community believe that the target is a person who needs to be watched or monitored.

Community health and safety

"In the service sector this may require identifying to employees persons who have a history of aggressive or inappropriate behavior in the store, bar, mall or taxi.

The identity of the person and the nature of the risk must be given to staff likely to come into contact with that person. While workers have the right to know the risks, it is important to remember that this information cannot be indiscriminately distributed.

A woman named Jane Clift in the U.K. went through a very similar type of flagging system. A warning marker was placed against her name designating her as potentially violent.

Violent Persons Registry

She sensed that, everywhere she went, there was "whispering, collaboration, people scurrying about". "Everywhere I went - hospitals, GPs, libraries - anywhere at all, even if I phoned the fire service, as soon as my name went on to that system, it flagged up 'violent person marker, only to be seen in twos, medium risk'."

Jane Clift was targeted this way and spent four year clearing her name.

Individuals are being flagged without their knowledge. In many countries these community notifications might fall under community safety and health laws. It seems that employers, educational facilities, and community centers are in some cases flagging innocent individuals as a means of retaliation, silencing, or controlling members of society.

Maria Buffa, a former salaried employee in the personnel department at Ford World Headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan, said she, too, was sent to a psychiatrist after she filed a sexual harassment complaint in February 1999 against a woman co-worker. "You think, maybe I am the problem, else why would they be sending me to a psychiatrist," she said. The psychiatrist Ford selected, Dr. Edward Dorsey of Midwest Health Center, made a report that said the only psychiatric symptom Buffa displayed was anxiety. Dorsey's report said that the referral came from Ford's medical department and was at least in part due to her complaints of sexual harassment. He also noted that the Ford doctor who referred Buffa cited a couple of "incidents": She was seen yelling at someone, and she had shown up at a fitness center "wearing less than the usual amount of clothing for that physical activity."

In April 1999, Buffa's boss fired her "for the good of the company," she recalled being told.

Psychiatric Reprisal

The individual is then placed under overt and covert forms of surveillance. Everywhere the Targeted Individual goes, their name is flagged. In a big city this could mean that thousands upon thousands of people are getting a notification about the target. The person is followed around 24/7. Foot patrols and vehicle patrols are used to follow the Individual around, as part of the monitoring process. During these patrols a one handed sign language is used to assist the citizen informants with communicating to each other. They will use this to silently communicate to any business the target enters, or other areas.

Gang Stalking is experienced by the Targeted Individual as psychological attack, that is capable of immobilizing and destroying them over time. The covert methods used to harass, persecute, and falsely defame the targets often leave no evidence to incriminate the civilian spies.

It's similar to workplace mobbing, but takes place outside in the community. It called Gang Stalking, because groups of organized community members stalk and monitor the targets 24/7.

Many Targeted Individuals are flagged, harassed and placed under surveillance in this way for months or even years before they realize that they are being targeted by an organized protocol of harassment.

What happens during this monitoring and surveillance is very similar to what happened to many innocent individuals in the former East Germany or Activists and Dissidents in Russia. Many innocent people in the former East Germany would be targeted by the state, and then their friends, family, and the community at large would be used to monitor, prosecute, and harass them. The same persecutions and harassment's are now happening in democratic countries.

Once a person is flagged or has a warning marker placed on their file, the community becomes hypervigilant, and within this structure there is a targeted and illegal protocol of harassment that happens. Electronic means are used to monitor, harass and torture the target. When the target tries to describe what is happening to them, it sounds as if they have had a mental breakdown. The reality is electronic means are being used to make it appear as if the target has had a breakdown.

Electronic Harassment
This System is the “MOSQUITO” that is used in the UK to break up groups of unruly people. Creates A Protective Shield Of High Pressure Complex Ultrasonic Shock Waves.

The Mosquito device is being considered for banning by the European Union, cause it infringes on the human rights of children.
Produces a power field of ultrasonic shock wave energy. The frequency range is adjustable from 7kHz to 25kHz, with the PCC30 putting out 140db of sound (135db for the PPF40) measured at 30cm. Intended for mounting to vehicles for potential crowd control applications. Also excellent for keeping out pests from gardens, etc. Hearing protection recommended when in use.

Many of these devices are easy to access, and almost impossible for an unaware target to describe in a credible manner, without sounding as if they have had a mental breakdown.
Unauthorized intruders are exposed to a feeling of intense paranoia, discomfort, disorientation, nausea and other undesirable effects. Government research is currently investigating the weapons potential and may soon classify these devices!

In Russia similar means were used by the state to declare activist, dissidents or anyone they thought to be an enemy of the state as mentally unfit and many were institutionalized using this form of systemic control.

The closest thing to Gang Stalking that democratic countries have seen before this is McCarthyism, Cointelpro, and RED SQUAD programs. Red Squad programs were used for monitoring, and harassment of various groups. They have been in place for over a hundred years, and they also employed Informants.

Civilian Spies, who can also be termed "Covert Human Intelligence Sources" come from every level and sector of society. Remember anyone the Targeted Individual comes into contact with gets a warning about the target.

Just like with Cointelpro investigations, everyone in the targets life is contacted, advised as to why the individual has been flagged, advised not to discuss the notification and asked to be a part of the ongoing, never ending monitoring (systemic psychological harassment and manipulation of the target) process. This process is covertly designed to control the targets, keep them in line, or destroy the target over time, leaving them with no form of support.

These actions are specifically designed to mimic a psychological operation. This psychological harassment of the target is designed to destroy them over years, making them look crazy and leave them with no form of support. The individuals around the target carry out actions and tasks as they are instructed, without realizing that the structure is psychologically designed to break the target down.

Worldwide programs of control and conformity have been used with equal success and lethality. What we are seeing now is a co-ordinated and organized effort of control and conformity. Many countries around the world are currently using a model of policing called: Community Oriented Policing. It's described as a systemic approach to policing. It focuses on instilling a sense of community within a geographically located neighborhood. Communities come together and discuss what values they would like to have in their community, community development, and it's also a time to discuss any problems that might be happening in a specific area. If a problem is identified an investigation might be opened. These local programs in many countries have been forming partnerships with other government run programs at, provincial, state and federal levels. A process called Deconfliction allows them to share information. Reports of Gang Stalking are not only coming in from democratic countries, but they are coming in from many other countries as well.

The modern day systemic form of control could only be funded at governmental levels, just like it has in other societies where these similar types of harassment programs have been implemented. It's all part of a system of control and conformity that has been in place for many years. A system of control with many local groups and appendages taking part. Many targets report that their information is passed and shared between country boarders, and that the surveillance continues even when they travel.

What are the goals of Gang Stalking?

The official goal is listed as a notification for the community, to alert them of individuals who have been flagged, or have had a warning marker placed on their file. It's officially used as a means of investigating or monitoring individuals who have displayed inappropriate, or violent behaviours. The real goal in some cases however seems to be to isolate the target from all forms of support, so that the target can be set up in the future for arrest, institutionalization, or forced suicide. Other goals of this harassment is to destroy the targets reputation and credibility. Make the target look crazy or unstable.

Other goals involve sensitizing the target to everyday stimuli’s as a form of control, which is used to control targets when they get out of line. Once the target is sensitized, the Citizen Informants have an easier time identifying the Targeted Individual in public. The targets sensitivity is most likely added to their file as a warning marker and sign to watch for future reactions to.

The structure of this type of notification makes the targets vulnerable. Once a community goes into monitoring mode, they unofficially work towards driving the target from the community. This can be done by making the target destitute. Secondary goals include making the target homeless, jobless, giving them a breakdown, and the primary goals seems to be to drive the target to forced suicide. This is the same thing that was done to targets of the Stasi and Cointelpro investigations. It's a useful way of eliminating perceived enemies of the state.

What are other Names for Gang Stalking?

There are many names for this form of systemic control and harassment. Under the Gang Stalking label you will also find such terms as Community Mobbing, Community Stalking, Stalking by Proxy, Organized Stalking, Cause Stalking, Multi-Stalking, but it's all part of the same community notification harassment protocol. What many people do not realize is that Gang Stalking is just one appendage of this systemic form of control. There are other forms of control used to repress, and keep individuals in line. Other forms or appendages include, but are not limited to: Mobbing, Cointelpro, The Buzzsaw, Covert War, Electronic Harassment, etc. These are the just some of the names being given to a very old game, that is once again being played by governments on their unsuspecting citizens.

How are targets chosen?

Officially targets can be flagged and investigated for suspected, or reported behaviours. Unofficially the Targets can be chosen because of many other reasons. They can be chosen for political views. They can be chosen for whistle-blowing. They can be chosen because they belong to a dissident movement. They can be chosen because they asserted their rights at work, or filed a complaint. They can be chosen because they made the wrong enemy. Were considered to be too outspoken, unwittingly investigated something that the state did not want investigated, signed a petition, wrote a letter. They were deemed as suspicious by a civilian spy/snitch and their names were handed over.

It’s becoming apparent that targets might be chosen for this systemic form of control, if they are not already in some way a part of this controlled system. Eg. Many Targeted Individuals seem to be unaware of this community notification, flagging and monitoring system. Some targets also seem to be unaware that large chunks of our society are now being used as Citizen Informants.

Who gets targeted?

Targeting can happen to anyone in society. In the past primary targets of programs such as Cointelpro have been minorities. Targeting however can happen to anyone. Individuals are often targeted for being outspoken, whistle blowers, dissidents, people who go up against wealthy corporations, woman’s groups, (single) women, minorities, extremists, conspiracy theorists, anti-war proponents, individuals identified or targeted as problems at these community meetings, and other innocent individuals. The majority of the targets are often not aware that they are being targeted in this way. When a target moves, changes jobs, the harassment still continues, because they are still flagged, and a notification is still going out to everyone they come in contact with. Every time the target moves, the same information, lies, and slander will be spread out into the new community and the systemic monitoring and harassment will continue. Traits of those targeted

Who takes part?

People from all walks of life are a part of this system, because once a target is flagged, their information is distributed to a wide range of people, organizations, and communities. People from all races, ages, genders. Every sector of society that you can think of is a part of this. Civilian Spies/Snitches include, but are not limited to: General laborers, the wealthy, bikers, drug dealers, drug users, street people, punks, hip hop culture, KKK, black activists, church groups, youth groups, Fire Fighters, police officers, lawyers, health care workers, store keepers, maids, janitors, cable installers, phone repair persons, mail carriers, locksmiths, electricians, etc. There really is no minimum or maximum age range. An article came out recently in the UK, saying they were recruiting children as young as eight years old to be Covert Human Intelligence Sources.

Public individuals that the Targeted Individual comes in contact with are given this warning. These community notifications started with good intentions. Workers and the community at large do have a right to be notified if they are going to encounter persons who have violent, inappropriate histories. Citizens want to be able to protect themselves and their communities, however what is happening is that this program is also being used to falsely target innocent people.

Many do not understand or care that the end consequence of this flagging, this harassment protocol is to destroy a person. Many people in today's society are scared, they are willing to give up personal freedoms, for a false sense of security, and if that means taking away the rights of another individual to accomplish this, they have no problem doing this.

Why people participate in Gang Stalking?

There are many reasons that someone takes part in this.

1. Some do it for the sense of power that it gives them. They feel in control. Many wholeheartedly believe that this let's them know who is bad and who they need to protect themselves and their communities from.

2. Others do this as a way to make friends and keep friends. It’s something social and fun for them to do. They love that special feeling of monitoring and protecting their community. Many in society use the one handed sign language to communicate and it's very effective in breaking down race, gender, age, social barriers. Many believe that it also let's them know who is on their side, vs who could be the potential target.

3. Others are forced or blackmailed by the State or the police into taking part. I have seen a few people pressured into taking part.

4. They are told that they are part of homeland or national security. They are told that they are being used to help keep and eye on dangerous or emotionally disturbed individuals. They see themselves as heroic spies for the state.

5. Others are just local thugs or Informants who are already being used for other activities, and their energies are just diverted over into these community health and safety programs. Eg. Some may be given the choice of monitoring a Targeted Individual for the community or the police vs going to jail.

6. Others are told outright lies and slander about the target to get them to go along with ruining the targets life. Eg. Many caring families are told that the individuals has displayed mental health issues, or other socially unacceptable behaviours and might be a danger to themselves or the community at large, and that the notification is necessary for keeping the community safe. They are asked not to disclose this.

7. Many are however just average citizens who in the course of going about their day to day jobs, are being used to keep an eye out, and if a flagged target does come into their vicinity, they are asked to watch, monitor and observe the target. It's the way the society is.

What are some techniques used against targets?

A few of the most common techniques are listed below.

a) Classical conditioning.

Getting a Targeted Individual sensitized to an everyday stimuli. The targeted individual over a period of months, or even years is negatively sensitized to an everyday stimuli, which is then used to harass them. It’s used out in public to let them know they are constantly being harassed and monitored. Some examples of everyday stimulus that might be used include: sounds, colors, patterns, actions. Eg. Red, white, yellow, strips, pens clicking, key jangling, loud coughing, loud whistling, loud smacking of clapping of hands together, cell phones, laptops, etc.

b) 24/7 Surveillance This will involve flagging and following the target everywhere they go. Learning about the target. Where they shop, work, play, who their friends and family are. Getting close to the target, moving into the community or apartment where they live, across the street. Monitoring the targets phone, house, and computer activity. Surveillance Policy.

c) Isolation of said target.

This is done via reports. The flagging is meant to warn the community, but they act as little more than slander campaigns. They present a one sided assessment of the targets behavior and activity. The target is never allowed to tell their side of the story or to clear their name. This one sided assessment can include false reports, lies, and legitimate incidents where the target was set up. Eg. People in the targets community are told that the target is crazy, dangerous, a thief, into drugs, a prostitute, pedophile, in trouble for something, needs to be watched. This very flagging in and of itself is capable of creating paranoia, and false interpretation of everyday incidents.

Files will even be produced on the target.

It's been shown that community notifications of any kind can and do create a sense of paranoia within a community.

Community Notification
Some people might argue that they would feel more secure if they were aware of the identities of dangerous offenders in their neighborhoods, but widespread community notification actually serves to heighten fear of victimization. In a large metropolitan area, hundreds of thousands of people are notified of a dangerous offender's release, while only hundreds will come into contact with him in the community. This blanket notification propagates the belief that there are more "predators" in the community than ever before, and fearful attitudes among members of the public are reinforced. A vicious cycle results: widespread notification leads to an increase in the community's fear of crime which, in turn, leads to more calls for notification. We would also argue that the use of inflammatory language such as "predator" by politicians and officials also works to heighten fear and increase calls for more punitive action.

d) Noise and mimicking campaigns.

Disrupting the targets life, sleep with loud power tools, construction, stereos, doors slamming, etc. Talking in public about private things in the targets life. Mimicking actions of the target. Basically letting the target know that they are in the targets life. Daily interferences, nothing that would be too overt to the untrained eye, but psychologically degrading and damaging to the target over time.

e) Everyday life breaks and street theatre.

Flat tires, sleep deprivation, drugging food, putting dirt on targets property. Mass strangers doing things in public to annoy targets. These strangers might get text messaged to be at a specific time and place, and perform a specific action.

f) Electronic Harassment.

Electronic means can be used to create the illusion that the target is having a mental breakdown, when in fact they are being targeted and harassed by a community that is trying to get them to move, because they believe that the person is a danger, or an undesirable. This flagging system allows the community to treat the target as less than, someone they are allowed to harass, and victimize. It gives them a license to do unspeakable things to innocent targets, and their families.

Hightech Harassment
This is not just another revenge book. This is the ultimate revenge book-high tech recipes for madness concocted by the author in collaboration with the experts. Scott French interviewed engineers, bank tellers, phone operators, computer technicians, radio and TV managers, and asked them point black, "How would you get even with somebody?" What he came up with is a collection of electronics, chemicals, and common sense designed to push anybody over the edge. Discover how to induce insanity with lasers, shockers, breakers, and blowers; clear beaches with "silent sound"; zap computer disks from a distance, bypas computer passwords, blast boomboxes and bother banks. In short learn to harass the forces of science and technology and excercise your God-given right to get even with anybody, anytime.

These actions might seem harmless to these Citizen Informants, but in reality the actions could be causing great psychological trauma for the target. Eg. Blocking targets path, getting ahead of them in line, cutting or boxing them in on the road, saying or doing things to elicit a response from targets. Etc. It's like the death of a thousand paper cuts. One or two minor incidents will not cause any harm to the target, but over time the target is slowly worn down.

Where does the support or funding for this come from?

Though the systemic harassment that Targeted Individuals refer to as Gang Stalking is immoral and unethical in nature, programs such as this in democratic countries, and none democratic countries have always been funded by the Government. They are the only ones with enough money, coordination, and power to keep such a system in place. These Co-ordinated efforts then join hands with others for this systemic form of control and harassment.

Ruling the community
"Ruling the community with an iron fist. “Savvy law enforcement types realized that under the community policing rubric, cops, community groups, local companies, private foundations, citizen informants and federal agencies could form alliances without causing public outcry.” Covert Action Quarterly, summer 1997.”

“You mean to tell me that it is legal for corporations from the private sector to team up with local law enforcement officials in efforts to spy on innocent members of our society? You also mean to tell me that the synthesis of law enforcement authority and the drive of for-profit companies operate under little to no guidelines or restrictions and it is unclear to whom they are responsible to?”

What can you do to help?

1. If you know someone who is being targeted in this way please don’t go along with it. Don’t assume that the person is guilty or a bad person. Many innocent people are currently being targeted, and people are being told lies. This form of harassment is systemic and it's about state control and conformity. The express goal of this harassment is to destroy the individual over time.

2. If you are aware of someone being harassed in this way, subtly direct them to websites that deal with Gang Stalking, or sites for Targeted Individuals. Knowledge is power.

3. You can subtly suggest that your local newspapers or community papers print articles about Targeted Individuals or even an write an objective piece about Gang Stalking.

4. If you are a law maker, you can petition for changing the laws. Ensure targets who are flagged in this way have proper notification letting them know that they are flagged. Convicted criminals have this right, why not targets? Many of whom are innocent members of the public.
Petition for better oversight of these programs. As it stands Communities are getting away with serious human rights abuses, and complaints are not being heard. Authority figures such as the police in many cases are not taking the reports seriously due to the type of warning markers attached to a targets file.

5. If you are a lawyer our community needs lawyers who are skilled in helping targets access Freedom Of Information files. Lawyers who can help targets get their files reviewed, or corrected. Lawyers who can work with the existing privacy laws to limit who and where the targets information is disseminated to. We need human rights lawyers who can address the complaints of abuses that are happening to people listed or flagged in this manner. Illegal surveillance, illegal access of mail and electronic communications, and torture via electronic monitoring.

6. Mental health professionals can recognize that there is illegal harassment happening to individuals who are flagged, listed or have warning markers placed against their names. Community notifications can and do create paranoia within communities. This notification makes targets prime for harassment, and community mobbing.
They can objectively investigate the complaints, and become familiar with the Electronic means of monitoring and harassment that are being used. Laws are just starting to catch up to the technology. Eg. Europe is considering a ban on the mosquito device, because it infringes on the human rights of children.

7. You can subtly offer your support to someone who is being unfairly treated, in very small little ways.

8. You can bring up the subject of Gang Stalking or Targeted Individuals.

How do participants communicate?

Communication happens in a number of ways. When on the street or in cars patrolling, they use a one handed sign language. Citizen Informants also seem to get ques via cellphone and some via earphones.

Their one handed sign language include things like tapping the side of the nose, corner of the eye, brushing back the hair 3 times, the infamous double blink, etc.

Here is a list of signals that the former East German Secret Police the Stasi used. These signals below are not gang stalking signals, they were used in the former East Germany.


1. Watch out! Subject is coming - touch nose with hand or handkerchief

2. Subject is moving on, going further, or overtaking - stroke hair with hand, or raise hat briefly

3. Subject standing still - lay one hand against back, or on stomach

4. Observing Agent wishes to terminate observation because cover threatened - bend and retie shoelaces

5. Subject returning - both hands against back, or on stomach

6. Observing Agent wishes to speak with Team Leader or other Observing Agents - take out briefcase or equivalent and examine contents.


1. GmB Bailey, "Bridging The Gap."

2. Gloria Naylor. “1996"

3. Kristina Borjesson "Into the Buzzsaw"

4. Jim Redden “Snitch Culture”

5. Noa Davenport "Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American WorkPlace"

6. Ward Churchill, Jim Vander Wall “Cointelpro Papers”

7. Anna Funder “Stasiland”

8. Protectors of Privilege: Red Squads and Police Repression in Urban America

9. Victor Santoro “GASLIGHTING How To Drive Your Enemies Crazy “

10. Anthony Brina “Suburban Spies”

11. Stephen Knight “The Brotherhood”

12. Alex Constantine “The Covert War Against Rock”

13. Frank Donner “The Age of surveillance”

14. Niki F. Raapana "2020"

15. Dr. Andrew M. Lobaczewski. Political Ponerology: The science on the Nature of Evil.

16. Community Oriented Policing. A Systemic approach.


1. The lives of others. (A movie about covert investigations in the former East Germany)

2. The Matrix. (Sci-fi Movie.) Neo a target wakes up and realizes not only is he being watched without knowing why, but that the world is a lie, that has been created to pull the truth over people’s eyes.

Source: Gangstalkingworld

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, March 22, 2010


Of Gods and Goddesses

People I am told have watched the movie Avatar and leave longing for that connection with the earth, but I think in our human history we once had that. Cultures are full of stories of Shamen, Oracles, and other mystics who could connect with the spirit realm in many different ways. I think it's fully possible for people to do such things if they want to.

I was just catching up on some mythology stories. Zeus and his seductions are some of my favorites. Some of the underhanded desperate things he did to get women.


Daughter of Lycaon, King of Arcadia. She was one of Artemis hunting attendants. As a companion of Artemis, Callisto would have taken a vow of chastity. Zeus appeared to her in disguise, probably as Artemis, gained her confidence, then took advantage of her. As a result of this encounter she conceived a son, Arcas.

I am trying to figure out if he seduced her fully in this guise or at some point took on his own form? Zeus pulled some stunts. These stories are interesting.


Leda and the Swan is a motif from Greek mythology, in which Zeus came to Leda in the form of a swan. According to later Greek mythology, Leda bore Helen and Polydeuces, children of Zeus while at the same time bearing Castor and Clytemnestra, children of her husband Tyndareus, the King of Sparta. As the story goes, Zeus took the form of a swan and raped or seduced Leda on the same night she slept with her husband, King Tyndareus. In some versions, she laid two eggs from which the children hatched.

Talk about desperation. Depending on which version of the story you read. I mean at which point did she realise it was Zeus? Then to bear four children at the same time. The Gods at times seem to think that the lives of mortals are just things to be played with, maybe they are to an extent.

Vrinda's chastity cast a sheild of invulnerability around her husband, Jalandhara. This made him invincile in battle. Distressed, the gods sought the help of Vishu, who suduced Vrinda by taking on the form of her husband. By the time Vrinda realized that the man who posed as her husband was an imposter, it was too late.

This is another story of unwilling seduction. I mean how desperate would you have to be to pretend to be someone you are not to seduce someone else? The horror she must have felt upon discovering that it was not her husband, or the person that she loved must have been insurmountable. It's a pretty cruel thing to do. In this story the seduction was used as a mean of getting to her husband and destroying him. But in other stories it's used to make wives appear as disloyal, and unfaithful, when that is just not the case.

I couldn't find anymore information on this story, and it's characters. I was trying to find out if this character ended up having the child of her false seducer. That often happens in mythology. Talk about adding insult to injury. To realize you have unwittingly betrayed someone you care about deeply, and then to have to carry the shame and guilt of that in the form of a child, would be equally horrible, but the ancient stories are full of Gods, and mythical creatures pulling stunts like this all the time.

All I could find on this story was that he used this deception to kill her husband and she became a widow.

Still I suppose even if someone takes on the form of the one you love, and pretends to be them, imitates everything about them, it's still pretty unforgivable. I wonder if her husband had lived, could he ever have forgiven her for not realizing the truth or the difference in time? For surly it was he that she loved, and not her fake seducer.

Mythology is full of such stories. I loved mythology when I was younger. Primarily Greek/Roman mythology. However all mythology has value and merit.

I often wonder if these stories come from a time when humans were closer to the earth? When people were more connected. Stories of mythical births like the Goddess of war, being born from Zeus's head, and so forth. Or I wonder if these stories happened on a mythical realm. Even when they found the city of Troy, there was mention of the Gods. I firmly believe at one time, before we became a technological society, we could in some places more easily connect with the other realms. The history of most societies have mentions of Gods and Goddesses.

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Handmaidens of the New World Order

I set out trying to find out what was happening to the Gang Stalking Community.

Why were we being followed around? How could they track targets from country to country? Why were Cointelpro and Stasi like tactics being used on average citizens to systemically destroy their lives?

I thought I was going to find something easy to fix, but what I found is far more widespread.

Under the same pattern that has repeated itself throughout history, I found that the state has found a way to once again convince the good people of the society that they are doing God's work, or being good citizens, by systemically destroying the undesirables in society.

You are cleansing your societies of homeless, mentally ill, perverts, drug users, dealers, whoever is on a list and whoever you are told to destroy. You once again felt empowered, in control in charge. The power that had been taken away from you was back in your hands once again. You were doing the right thing, it was a not in my back yard mentality to rid your communities and societies of the filth and the evils infecting it, but somewhere along the lines, you have unwittingly become the monsters in the closet, that you sought to remove from amongst you. You have unwittingly become the handmaidens of the New World Order.

Almost every shift in history that has happened, first had an informant force. Under the guise of this program, we now have such an extensive force of informants, but if the reports from targets are true, we are well on our way to having an international informant force. Citizens who use a one handed sign language the same way the Stasi did, and pretty much for the same purpose.

For along with the undesirable, you are helping to remove those undesirables the state does not want in our societies. You are helping to remove the outspoken, the whistle-blowers, the aggressive, those who don't fit into this system, your future leaders, the free thinkers, those who question. You are removing those 1 in 20 who would sound the alarm, write those controversial stories, be outspoken and tell the state where to go, and where to stick it. Those types are easy to spot in the workplace, schools and community, and those types ask the questions that should have been asked a long time ago, but are not. Those types challenge this system and are being removed, disenfranchised, eliminated for their efforts.

Don't get me wrong, I am sure in the beginning, pedophiles were allowed to feed on the innocent, violent offenders were allowed to commit acts of violence, and much like in V 4 Vendetta, this created a problem. It created fear, but not to worry, your government had the perfect solutions for you. They would give you lists of people, those undesirable amongst you that you should protect your society from and unquestioningly, you would go after them, like a vengeful plague, and remove them from amongst you. Convinced of the righteousness of what the state told you to do, you proceeded in that vain, without question and with impunity.

I don't doubt that there are bad people in society, people who do really evil things, that we would like to have advanced warnings for, but just like programs of the past, this is also being used heavily to get rid of people you are going to need, or would have needed for a revolution/rebellion. People on forums keep asking where are our leaders? We have this intrinsic sense that there amongst us should be those that are smarter, capable of organizing, telling the rest of us what to do, how to get out of this mess? I am sure there are and you know where to find them? Look for them in the mental wards, jails, the homeless, disenfranchised, and in the morgues. That is where your leaders and future leaders are ending up.

At first it seemed weird that programs like bullying, mobbing, and Gang Stalking targeted specific kinds of people, but that now makes perfectly good sense.

The order that is coming into play, will systemically remove this sort from every community, and what will be left, will be a highly biddable population. These leader types are easy to spot and target, they are outspoken, they in a natural setting would rise to the top, but often they are mobbed out of work, set upon, and under systems such as Gang Stalking, become poor, disenfranchised, end up in jail, mental wards, committing suicide, mass murder, or being pinpointed as undesirables to be removed.

We saw this with the Civil Rights Movement, the systemic destruction of the Panthers and others who would go against this system. Ruby Ridge, Waco. I kept asking throughout the research, why have no significant movement or leaders arisen since that time? What's happened to them? Well if anyone remembers many from that time were systemically eliminated, some are still in jail, on death row, fugitives from their own countries. The history of groups such as the panthers is very illuminating. How the state deals with dissidence, and how it's continued to since that time, to ensure that now become too influential, how it fosters, and nurtures false leaders who are then consistently presented to the people. False movements. When I did the research, I found many of the similar things happening amongst the various groups, be it extremists, conspiracy theorists, AIDS dissidents, etc. Disinfo, people hired by the state, agents, those with an agenda, legit people being discredited, demonized, murder, assassinations, suspected assassinations.

The influential in our society that rise seem to never last for long. Not to get into conspiracies, but Princess Diana was just coming into her own when she meet that terrible car accidents, her campaign for landmines and anything else she did in the future would have had a pretty big impact on society, most likely in a positive way. What's interesting about Diana is that her image in the U.K. press had become somewhat bad before her death, and it had been rumoured she might even be planning to leave the U.K. She was often hounded by the media, at times in disrespectful ways that did not suit someone of her stature, and then the car accident happened, which she predicted ahead of time, and that was that.

Micheal Jackson King of Pop was coming back in his own, and he was a very influential person, who had a large and diverse following, he felt that there was a conspiracy against him, and from what I have researched, I agree. Anyways he passed away at a time when he might have been able to influence a large population of people, who needed guidance.

Accidents, mishaps, mysterious deaths, whistle-blowers, scientists, the inquisitive, outspoken, it goes hand in hand, and most don't notice that these sorts are being removed and cleaned from our society.

The handmaidens of the New World Order with their good intentions, who have been lied to in some cases are at it again. In order to save themselves from the evil terrorists, that hate their freedoms, many have given up their freedoms. Soon your minds will be read at airports, and maybe other places, naked scanners are now going to be mandatory. People are being arrested for mind crimes, crimes that they might do. Forced mental exams. Little by little this planned system is revealing itself, and those who would stand in it's way, are being eliminated by hook or by crook.

That's how a take over can be happen. It can be done in the open with blood shed, it can be done with force, this attempt has been made in America before, but failed, or it can be done from the inside out, slowly and insidiously without ever firing a single bullet.

Lot's of death, but very little blood shed. The enemies are quietly being removed from every community, a nice little house cleaning is happening. The outspoken are being silenced, the real truthers being removed. Anyone with influence who is not onboard will be removed before their influence can become too great, and people are consistently feed a stream of false leaders, and prophets, but somewhere inside we remember what real leaders should be like, and we long for them.

The problem remains those in charge understand something essential, they understand human nature, human history, and they understand how to manipulate it, influence it, control it, keep it bottled up. They know how to work it towards their will, and they are succeeding. We have had some good and vital awakenings with the Internet, but as those internet freedoms are slowly being bottled up again, we sit passively watching once more. The awake seemingly not enough to make a difference which is not true, cause all it takes is one to make a difference, but that one never quite seems to make it to the top, the true leaders never seem to quite rise to where they need to be.

When I was doing research into the extremist community, I looked at how Grant Bristow and Wolfgang Droege formed a party in Canada. It was one of the biggest of it's kind, and did very well, very influential. Only one problem Mr Bristow was a paid agent from the start, working for a Canadian Intelligence agency. Yet under the combined leadership, the group they formed was one of the most influential. After Bristows cover was blown, and Drogue did somemore time in jail, he was not able to come out and be effective. In fact he found himself jobless, and according to many online sources it's been implied that he eventually ended up working for the police as an informant. He also sold drugs from his home. Oddly enough Mr Droege was shot by a Targeted Individual, who felt that Mr Droege was responsible for his surveillance and gaslighting that he was experiencing. Strange world. The point is however, though I don't agree with Droege's views, when I did research him, I believe he was sincere in his views and genuinely wanted to do what he felt was right for his community, so why did he not rise to the top on his own? Why was he not supported after leaving jail? Why was he left so disenfranchised that his fate was to join forces with the police, selling drugs to survive?

Most will see the above example and say, oh but he was an extremist who cares, but it's not just happening to this group, and we should all care, because it's happening to all groups in society. The real groups, leaders often struggle for bread and butter, while people like the Hal Turners of this world get people to send in donations. He was making 100,000 as an informant, yet he still had those donations coming in, how many real leaders lost their homes, while people followed the FBI's solution to fake leadership? This happens in many communities.

The plants tend to get the media attention, the money, and the followers, which I think could be in part because the informants are told which groups to support. I have watched this time and again in the Gang Stalking community so I know the pattern all too well. People follow the wrong group, wrong leaders and waste their time, money, and efforts going after the wrong things. This is done deliberately. This happens across the board. Controlled opposition, controlled rebellion, while real rebellion get's dealt with.

As long as they understand human nature it seems that they will control us to their ends. A shift is happening, it feels like the same influences who were behind much of what happened in Nazi Germany are back at their own games, and history feels like it's about to have a repeat. It's hard to imagine, because for many things seem so normal, they don't see the similarities. Others see it all too well and have been trying to warn others to no avail.

History has never had a good record of not protecting it's Messiahs. Jesus, Joan of Ark, to help humanity is to be turned upon in many cases, this pattern seems to be fairly consistent as well. Can this change? Sure, people have to start with the young. The undue influence with their lives, and minds begins early. Parents should limit what they watch on television. Teach at home if you can, but most people's lifestyles just do not allow for this. Our children are often handed off to strangers, or the agents of the state to be trained up and educated the way they see fit, and the ones that are not, will be medicated to fit that bill, or bullied to become socially engineered compliant non thinkers.

This generation will believe what they are taught, if that is loyalty to the state, then loyalty to the state it will be. It they are taught that being informants is the right thing to do, they will not question it. If they grow up in a society where mind reading technology is used in every day life, and naked scanners, they won't think that it's unnatural. It's the same way this generation uses cellphones, they won't question these technologies, or being even RFID chips, or ink on their bodies. They just will not know a time before them. If you can get to your children first, then you stand a chance. However the few who can raise up healthy free thinkers then run the risk of having their children grow up to be future targets of the state. For free thinking, and the outspoken, those who do not follow the orthodoxy, have been prime targets throughout history.

As it is now, it seems a similar clearing is happening, and the handmaidens of the NWO are being used, wittingly or unwittingly to bring about those ends. Right before your eye a system is being unveiled, and an agenda is happening, some see it, many don't, but it's there, and as it becomes more visible, people will be amazed, but this is a system that was predicted a long time ago. It is one that has been coming into affect for some time now. I think that change is possible at any stage, I think that a difference can be made, that is why this system is so careful about what influences are allowed to rise. I think if the people ever stopped following false prophets, took ownership, and stopped looking outside of themselves for answers that change could happen. First however it's helpful to realise that there is an agenda at foot, then once you understand the size and scope, and don't allow yourself to be paralyzed with fear, then real change can happen.

Labels: , , ,

False Hope?

False Hope?

I saw the draft for a new bill and initially got excited that someone was looking to draft a bill.

[quote]Advanced Media Press Release Organized Stalking and Directed Energy Devices and Weapons Bill May 19, [/quote]

The problem with this bill or any other however is that if it does not address what is really happening it is just more false hope, more distraction, that will lead targets in the wrong direction and waste their time.

Real targets you can not afford that.

It's taken some time, but this week there was some small success in getting generating enough interest in the subject of Gang Stalking to have a positive article written about the subject matter.

Keep in mind that these articles do not always have long shelf lives. That is why every real oppertunity counts. Eg. I was just trying the link for the article

"Stalker Claims unsettle police"

The link was not working and a search for a new link was not successful. The original article just came out last year.

[quote]Stalker claims unsettle police

(by Anthony G. Attrino - March 12, 2009)
Detectives are questioning a former Verona resident who has been handing out fliers claiming a large, organized group of stalkers is targeting residents and business owners with the objective of destroying their lives.

"Their intention is to murder their target without getting their hands dirty. It's the perfect hate crime." states the flier, which is titled "A Community Secret Revealed: Organized Stalking is Thriving in NJ."


It's important that the right focus is not shifted away. If any bill is created that does not point the finger at government or community programs, then they will do Gang Stalking targets very little good. The same was true for this story.

[quote]Court to Defendant: Stop Blasting That Man’s Mind!

The story was great on the outside, and it was good in some regards, but not many targets could use it for getting out of their own situation or circumstances. His case was very specific, and the person failed to show up for court.

This is being done by government programs. The finger must be pointed, or it does not matter how many politicians, fake experts, fake groups they throw at us, as a community we will never get where we need to be if we allow ourselves to be falsely distracted.

We need laws which for the state to share with an individual when they have been placed on lists, so at least they have an idea of what is happening to them. We need oversight of these programs, there is none happening now, and devastating consequences are happening. From what I can see, it's fully deliberate, and designed to be that way.

It's more false hope that plays into the hands of these people once again. Let's stay focused and when real evidence presents itself let's examine those channels. There is lot's of good information coming out about Violent Person's Registries, and this is a very strong direction that we should all be looking at and examining. If this is what is being used, then any future laws to protect Targeted Individuals, must go after these lists, and oversight of these lists. Plus Freedom Of Information Act requests, to see who has been targeted by these programs.

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, March 20, 2010

The Canadian Center of Occupational Health and Safety List
The Canadian Center of Occupational Health and Safety

[quote]Unless otherwise prohibited by law, the duty to inform workers under subsection (1) includes a duty to provide information related to the risk of violence from persons who have a history of violent behavior and who may be encountered by a worker in the course of his or her work.[/quote]

[quote]Workers have the ’ right to know ‘ all risks and safe work procedures associated with the job. This may involve identifying individuals with a history of unpredictable or violent behavior.[/quote]

[quote]The identity of the person and the nature of the risk must be given to staff likely to come into contact with that person. While workers have the right to know the risks, it is important to remember that this information cannot be indiscriminately distributed.[/quote]

This is similar to the Violent Person's Registry, that Jane Clift was placed on in the U.K., but this is the Canadian version.

Every country has similar reporting systems under health and safety. Canada, U.S., U.K., Europe, etc. The question is are they sharing the information, from what targets have reported, it sounds like this is getting shared across boarders. A Freedom of Information Act (F.O.I.A.) request should shed some light on this. When going to a lawyer, this is a good place to start.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Still pretty happy

Still pretty happy

I am sorry that I have not updated this sooner. I pretty private person, but I think sharing bit's and pieces here and there would not be too amiss.

The last couple of years kept me on the outside of a part of my life I really wanted to be in on. I felt excluded and I hated that, it made me feel like I was not a part of the equation, just a passive viewer, if even that. It's like being semi-remote viewer on your own life, always on the outside, wondering what is going on. Feeling only valued for one purpose and not much else. I have been there and I hated it.

What I hate even more would be to unintentionally make anyone feel that way, cause that would not be the case. People have value and that's how I feel.

Lately I have been trying to stay out of my spiritual side to a degree, again not cause I want to be, because I am happier than I have been in a really long time, but it's cause I realise like I said before, spirit is just not as divisable as I use to think, and maybe that is because I was on the outside looking in so much.

I am failing miserable at times, cause being happy is contagious and who does not like to be happy? Anyways I find myself happy, smiling, and that flows through, wither I want it to or not. I feel at peace, balanced, and just hormonic.

I feel joy, and that's a good thing. On a spiritual level, everything is fine, and in a legitimate place "to the best of my knowledge." My internal dialouge seems to be fine, I do find that I am picking up a bit of a "Hick Twang" from somewhere, when I tune into my internal dialouge it's there, and it cracks me up, wonder where that could be coming from? :-)

Anyways, I think that's as much appropriate sharing on this side that I can do. I am happy in spirit, and it shines through into this realm.

Labels: , , ,

Changing The Time

Changing The Time.

I know this concept sounds weird and before all the mental health professionals start evaluating this post, keep in mind that an attempt has been made to make this scenario happen before.

If you believe the history of the Jesus entity, or Jesus carnation, then you know that along with the story of his birth, that a powerful ruler tried to wipe out his history, before he could do what he was meant to do.

Many will recall that the wisemen came to visit Herod, telling him that they had been following the star of the King of the Jews, and that he had been born. Harold told them to report back to him when they found him. Find him they did, but instead of reporting back to Herod, God came to them in a dream, if I recall correctly, told them about the evil intentions towards the child, and they went another route.

Herod then decided to cover all his bets, and have all the males under two years old killed. Mary and Joseph fled to Egypt and Jesus was saved to grow up to become the Messiah. For those who believe, it's a great story, and an amazing history. For this time period I guess we could say that Herod tried to pull a T2 (Terminator part 2) on Jesus. Removing him after he was born.

So this being grew up and went on to predict a future time, where a one world government would come into affect, forcing rich, poor, young, old to get a mark on their right hand and or forehead. Well today we have a society where much of what has been predicted is coming to pass. Family betraying family. (I believe the way he used betrayed referred to the Informant system. I believe this because he uses the same thing to describe what Judas does to him, when he says, "Judas, betrayest thou the Son of man with a kiss?"

Thus a Messiah went on to be born, grew up, and fulfilled a prophecy, at least that is what the majority of Christians believe, and thus part of the basis for the Christian faith.

Now in today's society would anyone try to do something similar? Well what if they already are? Remember under Cointelpro the goal was to prevent the rise of any future Messiahs. At the time it was quoted as

"Prevent the RISE OF A "MESSIAH" who could unify, and
electrify, the militant black nationalist movement."

It was aimed primarily at the black community, but Cointelpro's goals of preventing the rise of future Messiah's did not stop with this community. It's now policy for every group. Groups are still infiltrated, sabotaged and die before they can be truly formed.

I should add that many leaders are created, they are not real. Eg. Recently it was discovered that Hal Turner was hired by the FBI to fulfill a leadership role.

The same thing is happening in conspiracy communities, and in other communities as well.

The ghetto informant program started in black communities as a way to turn people into informants, and it heavily infiltrated this community, but ofcourse this did not stop there and now they have people being turned into informants for parking ticket violations.

[quote]In the 1960s and 1970s, the funding allocated for the intelligence informant program was twice that allocated for organized crime informants. At the height of the civil rights era there were more than 7,400 informants in the Ghetto Informant Program alone.[/quote]

[quote]But Hervey said she doesn’t use drugs and, having just moved from Batavia to the tiny village of Attica, doesn’t know anyone in Attica who does.

That didn’t stop her recruitment as a confidential informant.

“He [Graham] said if there was someone I know who sells drugs, I would tell them I would meet them in the Burger King, like I was going to sell them drugs.

“He had me scared,” Hervey said in an interview with The Buffalo News. “He even said if I didn’t sign this paper, I would spend the night in jail.”

She signed the contract, Graham took the handcuffs off her, and she became the newest confidential informant for the countywide drug task force.

That is until she got home and called her father, labor lawyer Richard Furlong, who went ballistic at what she had done.

After chewing out his daughter for failing to pay the traffic tickets and getting her license suspended, Furlong, a combative attorney who represents unions in their negotiations with management, went to see Attica Police Chief William Smith.[/quote]

Most of this is happening via these intelligence agencies. So back to time line manipulation, the CIA for the last 40 years has been playing around with remote viewers, people who claim, they can go and see backwards and forwards in time. Imagine what a creepy agency could do with such a thing, and the psi project they created claims such an ability, so the time line shift thing does seem as strange as it did before does it?

I have been saying that there was mind reading technology, and individuals that have this ability. I have been able to prove the technology exists, and they might soon even be using this at the airports.

I have been telling you that the flat screen monitors in mall and other places might have cameras, and now the article that just came out yesterday, shows that this information has been correct.

That facebook will use you to find your friends and contacts so in-case you disappear, they know your circle of friends to search and track down.

Lastly the intelligence agencies have been working together and sharing information from local, to federal levels and thanks to the EFF (Electronic Freedom Foundation) the proof is out there.

So what seems science fiction today, might well be science fact tomorrow.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 10, 2010


This is a little affirmation. It's just a quick follow up to the I Am Happy post.

I want to stay happy. For me this means on a spiritual level staying as far away as I can from those things that made me unhappy. It means not going back to the darkness, and staying in the light.

I like breathing in air. I like when an experience is right the fact that it just flows. For me the last few years really shook my beliefs in how things worked when they were right, how things flowed. The reason being that in some spiritual aspect, I was not in a good place, where things flowed, where things worked. I just was not happy.

The brief glimpse of happy that I had restored my faith in that, brought air back into my lungs, and I don't ever willingly or unwilling want to be dragged back into that place. It was an unappreciated place, that did not love or care for me, it was a place that brought me unhappiness.

I feel the flow that I had not felt for awhile, and I don't want anything to do with the place where I was. I see now that when you are around the right situations, people, that love you, care for you, nurture you, it makes all the difference, and it's as clear as a bell.

There is no confusion, psychological manipulation, no game, just a free flow, and that is where I am going to be. I am moving forward. I think the glimpse of what a happy stable, well cared for spirit, has been an inspiration for me.

It's restored my faith in a lot of things. I find now that I am able to distance myself from things and people that are not good for me on a physical plane. I still wish I had more control of distancing, or permanently removing unwanted elements, on a spiritual level, but I think that will come in time.

Being happy, even if it's for a moment makes such a difference. I feel back in my game, so this is just a quick affirmation of that.

The old game, that was played for the last few years stop here. I am moving forward, I am distancing myself from the last few years of things that did not work for me in spirit, I want nothing to do with that path, it was not a well path, and it is not something that I want.

I have found new paths, that have been kind, warm, welcoming, and those paths, or similar are where I will be in spirit, and if I can find similar on this plane, I might just do the same.

Labels: , , , , ,

Accoustic Mood Control

Now many of you have heard of the drug Rophenol also known as Roofies, guys give it to girls, they put it in their drinks, the girls pass out, guys do whatever and they don't remember a thing. Some guys call this a date, most girls call it rape.

So what is an Electric Roofie? It's a term I have just invented to try to describe the physical affects some Targeted Individuals experience at home. As part of the monitoring process that informants use, they will sometimes do is that they will use an accoustic or possibly (electric) pulses, vibrations, that puts the target to sleep. One minute you are awake, and the next you are asleep. Most targets are to sleep anywhere from a few minutes to several hours. It's manipulation of the body, but instead of physically drugging, you are put to sleep electronically.

This effect can also be used to induce moods such as happy, extremely sad, or even stimulated states.

I did a quick search to see if there are any patents for accoustic or electric devices that can do this. I believe what is being used is a beam similar to the audio spotlight. You can feel the pulsations, but it's fully silent to the human ear.


[quote]In recent times, the medical and dental professions have been investigating the possibilities of treating patients using light and sound therapy.

It is becoming apparent that both light and sound can effect the brain wave patterns in human beings. Light therapy is being tried as a means to prevent and reduce depression in certain individuals.

Some dentists are using white noise to control a patient's fear of dentistry and to reduce pain.



US PATENT 6,017,302 - SUBLIMINAL ACOUSTIC MANIPULATION OF NERVOUS SYSTEMS --In human subjects, sensory resonances can be excited by subliminal atmospheric acoustic pulses that are tuned to the resonance frequency. The 1/2 Hz sensory resonance affects the autonomic nervous system and may cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise acoustic frequency near 1/2 Hz used. The effects of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes, sleepiness, and disorientation. For these effects to occur, the acoustic intensity must lie in a certain deeply subliminal range. Suitable apparatus consists of a portable battery-powered source of weak subaudio acoustic radiation. The method and apparatus can be used by the general public as an aid to relaxation, sleep, or sexual arousal, and clinically for the control and perhaps treatment of insomnia, tremors, epileptic seizures, and anxiety disorders. There is further application as a nonlethal weapon that can be used in law enforcement standoff situations, for causing drowsiness and disorientation in targeted subjects. It is then preferable to use venting acoustic monopoles in the form of a device that inhales and exhales air with subaudio frequency.

The reason I bring this up is because several of the woman in the Targeted Individual community have discussed sexual assaults, that have happened by either having their food drugged, or by waking and not knowing what happened, or like Ramona Lopez, waking up in the middle of a group sexual assault.

The two most likely places for such an attack to occur are at home and at work. Those are the two most likely places to be put to sleep. If this can be used in other places, think of what they could do to Targeted Individuals or others.

An attack such as this is pretty specific, and often will just affect the specific target, no one else is affected. I have personally however been in a situation where I had two other co-workers in a training class experience the effect whenever I did. One was aware of it, and made a suggestion to counter what was happening. Till then I didn't really think anyone else was aware, cause they never said anything.

One use this device has is rendering the target almost instantly into a sleep like state. It can happen quite quickly. I think for Targets in a situation where you feel that someone is physically accessing your home, you can do a couple of things. Get a door club, a chain lock, put a small barricade at the door that is hard to remove, and will show signs if it's been tampered with. This should work in the case of physical entries.

Those suggestions should help you to protect against a physical attack, but how would you protect against an astral attack?

If you don't believe in the astral plane, don't worry about it.

I was not sure about introducing a very foreign concept in concert with a very real experience, but most of my readers are smart and I hope I can render this in an understandable manner.

On the site, Carissa Conti an abductee and Targeted Individual talks about her abductions, but she also brings up the point that these could be happening on an astral level, as well as a physical level.

Even if you are not a believer in (government) abductions, at least read the ebook she offers on her site. It's amazing how much government manipulation there is with what happens in that community.

Eg. They experience electronic harassment, they get followed around by helecopters, she has talked about implants, multigenerational aspect to her targeting, and her community is full of disinfo agents.

If I recall correctly Carrisa talks about that fact that some of the abductions, assaults, and other things that happen could be happening to her on an astral level, but that the abdicatees might not realize this.

Think about what that means if some creepy agency has learnt how to manipulate individuals in this way? They can currently put you to sleep at will, but in the abductee community, they could then use that to either carry out physical experiments, or astral experiments.

Remember we live in a world where our own science is telling us that we might live in an holographic universe, so examining other spiritual principles falls into the realm of science. I think most average people would be able to interpret one realm from the other if such did exist, but again Carrissa present an interesting theory for some aspects of her targeting, that I think is worth mentioning.

The astral plane is just a spiritual realm. It would have nothing to do with the very real measurable things Target experience while fully awake and alert. This is a reference to what could happen in dream like state of consciousness. One is a sleep like state, but the theory Charissa presented was that a skilled person or government agency could access that realm.

It’s not that far out there a suggestion when you understand how far the U.S. and other governments have gone with psi phenomenon.

In the above video you have people who worked for a top secret U.S. government project telling you that they are remote viewers. Telling you that under this government project they could go backwards and forwards in time, see distant places, people etc. So to think that their could be an astral realm, or that governments would have projects ongoing in regards to that is not that far off a theory.

In 1970 the CIA working with the Department of Defense reportedly began their own then-undercover research program into astral projection. They called it remote viewing and were interested in it as a possible means to surreptitiously obtain information from enemies and engage in psychic warfare. The name of the remote viewing program was originally SCANATE (standing for Scan by Coordinate). According to those involved in the project, Russell Targ and Harold Puthoff headed up the research team at Stanford Research Institute. The organization that began as SCANATE became PSI TECH in 1989, and moved into the private sector but continues to be run by former military members who were involved with it when it was still under the auspices of the DOD. In November 1991 the Associated Press reported PSI TECH was engaged by the UN to help find possible biological weapons in Iraq.[/quote]

In theory this ability could be used to assault in a sexual manner, and the target in some cases would not be aware of it. Think of the potential uses. Some girl breaks up with some controlling, abusive ex, that she wants nothing to do with ever again, he just happens to have connections, and he can use this to take advantage, if not on a physical plane, then even on an astral plane. Astral in some cases would mean never having to ask for consent or permission again. So many sociopathic, and psychopathic types, this would be the ultimate power trip, feeling in charge and in control of someone else's life, and taking advantage of them at will. It would be rape, without many of the usual consequences or proof.

Government agencies could use this to fake abductee experiences. They could do this physically, but on an astral plane as well, thus the victims recollections would seem very scattered, since they never left the house.

I know this sounds odd. Most people have never heard of an astral plane, and most don't believe in one. I only bring it up, because on the site,, Carissa Conti does discuss this possibility in regards to her abductee experience.

For the most part, this is something that targets, need to be aware of. Along with food being drugged, be aware that the vibrations you experience can be used to put you to sleep like a rag doll, and that can leave you open to break in's on a physical level, and if you are aware of or believe in an astral plane, the same would also be true.

Shielding on a physical level is easy, the areas to protect are mid upper body, that's where vibrations will be felt, head, and heart are key areas to shield.

It's a strange new world. For those who are not aware, this will sound strange, even for those who are aware, this will sound strange, but eventually if this can be used on Targeted Individuals and others, this will be used on a more common level.

I don't have any useful tips for astral sheilding, but Carissa might on her site.

To find out more about astral plane and the CIA's work in this area, read the attached comment.

Labels: , , , , , ,