Gang Stalking

A upto date blog about my adventures with gangstalking. This is my way of sharing with the world what gang stalking is really like. Some helpful books. Gang Stalking Books Mobbing Books

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Girl gets gang raped. Hypocrites cry.

Girl gets gang raped. Hypocrites cry.

Link 1

Link 2

[quote]Investigators say as many as 20 people were involved in or stood and watched the gang rape of a 15-year-old girl outside a California high school homecoming dance Saturday night.[/quote]

Link 3

WALNUT CREEK - Onlookers laughed, took pictures and even joined in Saturday night during the two-hour gang rape of a semi-conscious 15-year-old outside her high school homecoming dance, police said Monday.

[quote]The boys, ages 15, 16 and 17, were among five suspects that had been arrested in connection with the crime as of Wednesday. Police were continuing their investigation and expect to make more arrests.

Police said they now believe that as many as 10 young men may have assaulted the girl Saturday after she left her school's homecoming dance. They initially said that about six young men attacked the girl.[/quote]

It really takes a group effort to make sure something like this get's done right doesn't it? A society that teaches group participation in the targeting and victimization of some if it's citizens could only produce results such as this.

I am sure many read the story this week of the 15 year old who got gang raped, by about 6-10 guys while about another 15 looked on or did nothing. It's like the movie the accused with Jody Foster, but for this time period, hopefully the guys managed not to chant while raping her, but who knows.

Now I am watching this story as the world get outraged and calls these boys sick and depraved and are disgusted by the ones who raped and equally disgusted by the ones who watched and did nothing.

Society are going on about what good people they are, how they would never sit back and watch while this happened, how the boys and young men deserve to be "hung, raped, and beaten, killed," whatever. I am quoting some of the comments that I have read. The thing that first struck me about this story and the hypocrisy that was sure to follow is that society watch and are aware of victimization's like this daily, and many themselves do nothing, but they don't see it in the same light, but I do, and that's what I have been reporting for the last few years.

Let me try to put this in context. Many when this story first came out blamed in on the youth of today, and the stop snitching culture of this time period, but I did not see it that way. See I can almost bet that many of these fine upstanding young men, were part of these citizen informant programs long before this even began, like so many teens are these days.

Also society seems to forget that they are currently taking part in one of the biggest stop snitching programs out there. The code of silence that prevents you from talking about your one handed sign language gang, is one of the biggest stop snitching programs out there. Seconded only to the police and their blue wall of silence and the Mafia's omerta. It's all the same code of silence, and people see wrongs happening under this all the time but are afraid to snitch and do anything about it, so if you want to condemn stop snitching, look no further than yourself.

The behavior that these boys and young men displayed, watching people get victimized, calling friends to come take part, taking pictures so that they can put in on the internet, and not saying anything to protect the group and cause they don't want to get their asses kicked. Where have I seen this before? Oh wait I know, this is what I see consistently with the victimization's that Targeted Individuals face.

You have members of society who come together to systemically destroy, victimize, and psychologically rape, and in some cases like Ramona Lopez physically rape targets. You destroy their lives, you rob them of their dignity, you dehumanize them, you rob them of what is sacred, and you like these animals show no remorse in many cases. (Not all cases because there are some who are not like this, not everyone is like this.) However too many are like this. They call their friends and other snitches to come watch the target break down, they wait till they are at the breaking point, then try to break them down that much more so they can push them over the end to suicide, and institutionalization. They take pictures of targets at their worst moments and post it, like sick trophies.

The ones who don't get blood directly on their hands, watch, and often cheer on what is happening, just like these males did. It's how society is. So when you act all outraged at these boys, men, males, and call them animals, and wish bad things on them, and want revenge for this girl, and call yourselves good people who would have acted differently, take a good look at yourselves, because everyday that you let Targeted Individuals be victimized and are aware of it and do nothing, you are the same as the bystanders in this case who did nothing.

Also many are blaming the girl, oh she got drunk with them and walked off into a dark alley with them, that does not justify what these creatures did to her. All it does is try to paint their actions as justified when they are not, just like many try to paint their actions against targets as ok.

Remember targets are psychologically raped and physically tortured in their homes, burnt, they are harassed daily, driven to suicide, some of our women are raped, some have electronic devices aimed at their reproductive organs (eugenics), some targets have their kids victimized, some have pets killed, some get into accidents where they die, or other accidents where they die, and this system this code of silence is protected. Many blast these boys for doing nothing, for keeping silence out of fear or retribution, but then do the exact same thing. They keep silence, watching our misery, they take part, and get their friends to join in, they see it as good sport, the same way the guys raping and watching this young girl must have seen it.

See people are quick to cast the first stone and condemn what these guys did, but where they are hypocrites is that they turn around and claim that they would not do the same thing, but they do the same things and worst to targets everyday. So here it is, here is your chance to prove that you are different, to prove that you are not hypocrites, to prove that you would not sit back and watch someone be raped physically or psychologically, that you would not watch someone be tortured and do nothing, or ignore it, or take pictures it on your cellphones the way so many informants do.

Here is your chance to prove that you are not hypocrites? Any takes? They kept silent the same as many of you will keep silent and protect the codes and systems that you have come to know. They watched this girl be victimized and violated, and some enjoyed it, because this is what the society is teaching them to do, so how can you expect any better when you get these results?

You have a generation upcoming, taking part in this sickness and learning that victimizing people, targeted people is ok, under specific circumstances, and then when that extends into the animalistic actions that we see here, how can you be surprised by it? This is what this system teaches, this is what you protect, and these guys are a product of this system.

When I heard this story was I surprised by it? No. Because such or similar victimizations are a daily thing in the Targeted Individual world, the only difference is that many of us, see the participants and this system for the violators that they are. After spending three years trying to get people to care, to speak out, I still get people trying to deny that such victimization's are happening, much less getting people to see their role in this and the true damage being done to the victims or the targets of this system.

It's equally reprehensible what is being done to targets, it's just our attackers are more numerous, our victimization is 24/7, and they don't drag us into dark allies to violate us, most of our violations are done in our very homes, the places we should be able to call sanctuaries.

Was I surprised by this story no, because I see the same or similar everyday, as people take part, or stand by and do nothing. Did I expect the hypocrisy, as society taps it's self on the shoulder reminding itself of what a good society it is, shouting we would never do that, if in the same situation we would report it, well here is your change to show what good citizens you all are.

Just a couple of the stories and the every victimization's some targets face.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, October 24, 2009

U.S. National Emergency. The ADEX Index

Back in Feburary of this year I blogged about something called the ADEX Index, it's a list of people that the U.S. government keeps, these people could potentially be rounded in a national emergency.

[quote]These ADEX lists have been around since the time of the Black Panthers and others. Many of the Panthers were on this list, Malcolm X, many others, and these lists exist now. The theory is that many of the outspoken are on the lists, journalists, just the usual suspects, and people have said political bloggers, etc. So if an emergency does happen there could, and it’s been speculated by these sites, will be round up’s.[/quote]

Well guess what, the U.S. recently decleared a national emergency for swine flu.


Emergency rules will make it easier to handle anticipated surge in patients

President Barack Obama has declared a national emergency as swine flu deaths reached 1,000. Photograph: Brian Kersey/Getty Images

President Barack Obama has declared a national emergency in America as swine flu deaths reached 1,000. In Britain, meanwhile, 122 people have died and cases of swine flu have more than doubled in the past seven days.[/quote]

1000 deaths and it's a national emergency. Keep in mind that the regular flu kills 36,000 people every year. Also according to a CBS article the CDC asked the states to stop testing and tracking swine flu cases back in July,


If you’ve been diagnosed “probable” or “presumed” 2009 H1N1 or “swine flu” in recent months, you may be surprised to know this: odds are you didn’t have H1N1 flu.

While we waited for CDC to provide the data, which it eventually did, we asked all 50 states for their statistics on state lab-confirmed H1N1 prior to the halt of individual testing and counting in July. The results reveal a pattern that surprised a number of health care professionals we consulted. The vast majority of cases were negative for H1N1 as well as seasonal flu, despite the fact that many states were specifically testing patients deemed to be most likely to have H1N1 flu, based on symptoms and risk factors, such as travel to Mexico.


The development is very interesting and should be watched closely. Based on the CBS report, the swine flu was being overestimated when testing was happening, it was not as wide spread as believed. Since some testing stopped in July, how can the true state of swine flu be determined? Even if 1000 U.S. citizens have died, it does not compare to the seasonal flu, which kills 36,000 in the U.S. annually.

So instead we have a government with national emergency powers, which include round up's of citizens on the ADEX Index, and other measures that they did not previously have for a flu that is no worst than the yearly flu.

One has to beg the question, what is the true purpose of this national emergency being called?

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, October 22, 2009

The snitches have no clothes

I have had the chance to observe the informants recently. They are like the story, the emperor has no clothes.

See they are slaves in a system that controls them yet some imagine themselves as free citizens, empowered citizens, deputized, partners of the state. It's the biggest lie ever.

It's funny to watch the slaves go into overdrive to defend and protect the very system that holds them bound. Some of them really are mental in that regard, in a frenzied type way.

At one point I thought that most people hated the violations this type of system caused, I mean this is what the Stasi did to it's citizens, but no, some love this. A generation ago, democratic countries were preaching about the evils of countries who turned their citizens into informants. Watching this system is like watching someone take a young girl, putting her out on the street corner, and watching her brag about the freedom of being a prostitute, and yet that is what I am seeing in some regards.

People that are slaves, but who are proud of their slavery, and will do what they can to defend it. Slavery for the people by the people. We would frown and look down on someone in the example above, and encourage her to end her slavery, and be mystified when she claimed to like the freedoms that came with being prosituted out, but that is what I see in some ways daily, and I am mystified by it.

I have spoken about this system before. It empowers citizens the same way the Nazi's were empowered against their neighbours the Jews. From the side of some Germans, it was a time of community, coming together, working together, protecting the fatherland, they were helping to get rid of what they saw as the bad element the problem for all their woes. Many wanted to be part of something that was greater than themselves, and so the power, the true power is given away and exchanged for something that looks shiny and effulgent on the outside, but that is truly as dull as brass on the inside, and most citizens do not know the difference, because in this modern day society of the haves and the have nots, most people do not have, have never had, and so they simply do not know the difference.

This is what they have, this is what makes them feel connected, special, purposeful, and the same way some of the Germans worked together, formed a sense of community, is the same way these people work together, to protect the very insane system that controls them all. It's replaced family, community and God. The system is what they worship, bowdown to, fear and give their allegence to.

Watching it up close and personal is interesting. I really do think this system has some form of mental illness. It's funny that they try to make targets look mentally ill, but in reality this system is what is unwell, and needs a cure.

This system has more wrong with it than right, but to see those at a ground level who would defend it is truly sad. I see members of society who have so little that they will protect their own slavery, who buy into a myth that they have become a part of something special, worth fighting for and defending, but that's a lie. From this side of the fence, I see truly insane people, who have so very little, they would fight to preserver their own slavery, because it makes them feel special, connected, powerful, it's their larger than something.

That special feeling, that having something, and belonging that too many people in society grow up without. I know not everyone wants to be enslaved, but the longer members stay a part of this cult, I think it puts them at risk of forgetting that there was and still is something greater than this cult, this controlled system they have given themselves to.

They act so proud of what they are, yet run and hide in the shadows at the first sign of light being shown on who they are and what they do. It's interesting. This system does not stand up to the light, how could it when it's a system of darkness, like so many others of it's kind, that has been seen before.

Many in this upcoming generation are growing up without, without a sense of moral right vs moral wrong, people complain about pedophile rings, and corruption, yet they roll around and take part, and are a part of the very system that allows such, and is designed to allow such to happen. Those evil things are the sacrifice to this evil system, and those who defend it are responsible in their own way. It's like those who harass targets, they get in one harassment here or there, but they are never responsible for the whole. They spread it around enough so that their hands do not seem dirty, but their hands are dirty.

Freedom is not free, not the way many have been taught, it's a lie and an illusion. I am learning a lot on this journey, and it's interesting.

The first thing is that if you want change, really want change, it comes from within first, and then radiates outward. I think societies enslavement is just comfortable enough that people are willing to trade it off for what might be real freedom, true freedom, but after all what is true fredom, when many have never really experienced it?

So I say it with all due respect, but the snitches have no clothes.'s_New_Clothes

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, October 17, 2009

Death Threats. Mistaken Identity. Business as usual.

I have not had a chance to keep you up on some of my day to day stuff, so I thought I would give a brief update.

I meant to post some time ago but I have been busy.

It seems for the last little while the informants have been under the mistaken identity that I am one of them. I have tried politely to indicate that I am not, but the Iamnotazoombie tee-shirt has been in the laundry my apologies. No seriously. Two things in my opinion seem to have lead them to this belief.

In typical me fashion I took the time to make inquiries into a situation that I thought might not be right, like strangers and neighbours use to do for each other at one time,in the not too long distant past. Well with actions like those, it seems to have given them the indication that I was maybe one of them. No people in the not too long distant past, if you thought something was not right or something was off, you did little inquires to find out what was happening and to try to help. Watch little house on the prairie sometime, it's chocked full of such moments. (It's retro show, but you can find it somewhere on the net.)

Anyways apparently the open communication signal that they have can be performed in a few different way. Along with taking a drink from something or pretending to yawn, it can be done by slowly placing food into your mouth, because it's still the hand to mouth gesture. I was not aware of this previously, I am now, and though I try to avoid yawning in public now, or if I do I try to cover in a fashion that does not lead them to think that I am one of them, I also try to avoid taking drinks that might lead them to believe that I am opening communication with them. I do however refuse to stop eating in public. So if you see me doing the hand to mouth signal with food, take it that I am just eating.

Sometimes this adventure reminds me of the tv show the greatest American hero. Got the suit, missed out on the instruction manual, and trying to learn all the rules as you go. What works and what does not. Lot's of fun along the way.

So with that in mind, not to mention that I have some smarmy agent that I am around in one capacity or another, who I do believe deliberately tried to make people think that I was one of them. Snitch Jacketing? I don't know for sure. Anyways because they though I was not doing my mindless zombie informant duties, I mean citizen duty, they became infuriated.

Keep in mind that one a daily basis for the last several months, I have had the car swipes, you know when cars just try to freak you out and pretend they are going to hit you, however like any good game, some of the players have tried to see how close they can get, with some sometimes lemony snicket results.

Anyways in a Targeted Individuals life, it comes with the territory. I have had death threats before, I am sure most of us have. I have also had the electronic monitoring, (what we call torture), get so intense that my body started to suction to my bed. At my old place, where I had no shielding, when I was first attacked, I guess they call it monitoring. Whatever they used creates I believe it's a static electric effect. I am not sure, but it creates an effect that produces some form of electricity. Eg. A static electric shock can be produced from simple motion, such as walking across carpeting. Well I was lying down, and being attacked/intensely monitored, and whatever they were using was creating a similar effect, but they ramped up the level of what they were doing to such a degree that my body literally began to what I will describe as suction to bed.

Whatever they were using to create the electric effect, sounded like some type of generator. It created enough electricity or static electricity that I had to pull away from the bed, because I was starting to suction to it.

I have blogged about what I believe fits the description of an ultra sonic attack. Being fired at with something that was swift, fast, hit hard, but did not leave any visible marks. When it happened I was sleeping, and it did make my heart accelerate. I do believe that older individuals with heart conditions would be adversely affected.
Anyways the little twerp that did it could be heard laughing and telling someone that he had gotten me, like it was the funniest thing. I could not see who it was, from his vantage point he could see me inside my apartment, but I could not see him, he sounded like he was in one of the apartment directly across the street from mine, or at street level. I could just hear him laughing and telling someone he had gotten me in an excited and euphoric tone, so I said out loud, what I would like to do if I got my hands on him. :-) Needless to say, that cut short the laughter.

I have had a lot of fun with these people over the years. The guy with the knife, the threats as full on street theater in the subway, etc. Good times all around.

Anyways recently they decided to take a more direct approach. Believing I was one of them, and a cult member of theirs and that I was not doing my cult duty, sorry I mean citizen informant duty, they decided on a much more direct approach, and though usualy on my guard, as I was expecting them to try something, they did get me a bit off guard. Had they succeeded, it might have gone in their favour, anyways, interference was ran, and their attempt was not successful, but they are cleaver little beasts. The way it was set up would have looked completely accidental, and would have caused a very bad injury or worst. Cleaver little animals. Cute little creatures.

I know this should be upsetting, but when you are in a nest of vipers and one tries to sting you, can you really be too surprised? This system and it's agents are such, and so an attempt at my person can be no surprise, they are what they are. They will move to protect the very system that is enslaving them. It's how they treat their members who get out of line, just like a cult would. I am not one of you, can you try to remember that. If I show concern for people it's not because I am some agent of the state. It's because I am from a not too far distant past where people did such things instinctively. If I am snacking out in public, it's just that. Unless I am testing out or trying to translate something.

I am on the good side, and my kind don't work well with vipers who try to snipe each other out. Apparently they will go to any lenghts to protect their secrets, thus the pathology of these people. I know nor care about what secret alliances they have formed with their state slave masters, and I care not. I am sure there was probably some ceremonial blood oath involved, or maybe it looked like a scene from a zombie movie, or night of the body snatches, not sure, don't care, between the informants and their slave masters, I mean handlers.

Anyways it's business as usual. There is a lot of good stuff that has come along. Read the stories over at following the links should help to paint a clearer picture of the system that we are up against, and those who have gone up against it in the past. Visit the section, check out the stories, videos, and articles.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Folsom Street Fair. Not for children

Not Gang Stalking related but you really should read this post if you care about children. Please do not click on the last two links if you are under 18. Thanks in advance.

Last year for the first time in my life I heard about something called the Folsom street fair. I had never hear of it before, it's an S and M fair. (Sadomasochism) You know whips and chains and so forth.

Apparently it's held in San Francisco every year. (The fair is also now held in Toronto and other cities.)

The fair shows S and M, but the participants are allowed to have sex in the open. I am being serious. Right on the street at the fair they are allowed to have various sorts of sex. The pictures that I am going to provide a link to, might be considered explicit or worst. I am not sure, I have only seen the blocked out ones. I did not choose to review the other ones.

My problem with this fair, is that children are allowed to come out to this fair. They are exposed to all these things. Young children.
The picture above is a picture of toddlers who's dads brought them to the fair in their little S and M outfits. I have concerns children being in attendance at this fair.

I believe very strongly that this fair is not for children. I don't believe that they should be allowed to be in attendance. If a family allowed children within a household to be in attendance for such activities, the children would be taken away without doubt, so why are the children allowed to view and be exposed to the following out in public, and why has no state authority in America stepped in to review this?

Is America ok with children being exposed to people having sex on the streets? If so then my apologies, please go on with your business, but if having children at a fair like this is a concern to you, then I suggest you take a stance. Request that children under age not be in attendance.

The following pictures are EXPLICIT I honestly think that they are pornographic in nature, but unless you see the pictures, you will not understand my concerns with children being in attendance.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Fraternal Twins

And you thought the Human Flesh Search Engine was confusing

Yesterday everyone was introduced to a new concept, well a concept that's been on the net for the last few months, and that's the violent person registry.

You were brought the story of Jane Clift who tried to inform on a drunken man who yelled obscenities at her, and got herself placed on a violent persons registry instead of him.

Here are some of the highlights and the recap. t-council-complaining-damaged-flowerbed.html

[quote]But her efforts led to a surreal nightmare in which she was branded potentially violent and put on a council blacklist with thugs and sex attackers.

Her details were circulated to an extraordinary range of public and private bodies, including doctors, dentists, opticians, libraries, contraceptive clinics, schools and nurseries. Their staff were advised not to see her alone.

The 43-year-old former care worker was forced to withdraw an application to become a foster parent and, eventually, to leave the town where she had lived for ten years.

Now, after a bitter four-year legal battle with Slough Council, the stain on her character has finally been removed.


She said that after the council acted, she sensed that everywhere she went, there was 'whispering, collaboration, people scurrying about'.

'One time I went to the contraceptive clinic and I felt that there were way too many people hovering about for me than should have been there, making me feel very insecure.

'It did serve as a reminder that everywhere I went - hospitals, GPs, libraries - anywhere at all, even if I phoned the fire service, as soon as my name went on to that system, it flagged up 'violent person marker, only to be seen in twos, medium risk'.'
[/quote] d-potentially-violent-complaining-vandalised-flowerbed.html

[quote]‘It has taken me four years to clear my name and I hope Slough and other councils never again misuse their registers.’ Simon Davies, from the human rights watchdog Privacy International, said: ‘This just shows the megalomania of these local authorities. This poor
woman was subjected to a Kafkaesque ordeal because of an incorrect allegation made by one official.

‘It is the sort of behavior that we would have condemned if it came from China or Russia. Our councils seem to be out of control.’ [/quote]

[quote]Jane Clift lived with the stigma of the violent persons register for three and a half years. Slough Borough Council refused to back down and maintained that she was a violent person. [/quote]

-She was blacklisted
-Forced to Move
-She is single and female
-When in public she felt surrounded by extra people who just should not have been there.
-Being placed on the list was used as an attempt to silence here.

So I have been getting the obvious question, but isn't this Gang Stalking or Gang Stalking like, the answer is yes, very much so and very much similar. Thus why we have the picture of Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen. They look exactly alike, and for most of their life, I assumed that they were identical twins. They are not. They are in fact fraternal twins, but without the blood work, and to just look at them, they look exactly alike.

I believe the violent person registry is close enough that many of us can use that to say look, here is the story of a women, who was placed on a watch list. Look at what happened to her, she was followed in public, forced to move, and had her life disrupted. If you are looking to get people to believe you, I don't see why you can't use this. I also think you can use the existence of such lists, to get legal procedures or inquires going. At the onset it looks enough alike. Also since I have not had a chance to find out the total nature of her harassment, I don't know how close a match this is yet. For the time being I am placing it in the fraternal twin category.

Where it differs. She was told that she was going to be placed on such a list. I have not come across one Gang Stalking target that was told they would be placed on a list. This means she had reasonable grounds and proof of who placed her on the list, the time frame, the incident that started this, and many of us will not.

When she moved it sounds like some of the harassment might of stopped. I don't know this for sure, but based on the articles, it sounds like the point of entry onto the violent persons list was where her attack was most virulent, that and ofcourse having that title on her head.

She is a single female, they were using it to keep her quite, so I suspect there was other harassment ongoing, which she probably left out of the article to sound sane. To get the nitty gritty if there was more would require more digging.

With Gang Stalking, or what we are calling Gang Stalking and I plan to continue calling that, we get Gaslighting. They monitor our homes 24/7. I don't know if that happened to Jane Clift or not. With Gang Stalking they try to make us look crazy, but I am sure that they also want us to look violent, pedophiles etc.

Based on the research, the article from the ACLU, other target testimony, things like the Buzzsaw, what happens with Gang Stalking is systemic. Many targets show a multi-generational aspect to the targeting. They kill targets, that goes beyond any kind of everyday list. What we see with Gang Stalking, is systemic destruction.

I however believe that a person unknowingly could end up on a list like Ms Clift did, and then have the same thing happen that we see in Gang Stalking. I believe that when this story came out, we were suppose to accept that this was all that there is to Gang Stalking and go on to our happy lives, that's clearly not going to happen.

With Gang Stalking, we not only have electronic monitoring happening, which more times than not, constitutes torture. These people co-ordinate not just from city to city, town to town, but across country lines.

The informants are not just one and few people, the reports, research, shows that we are setting up Stasi States, or States like China, where the citizens are all snitches. Sorry I mean Citizen Informants.

With Gang Stalking, there is a systemic collaboration that happens. Ms Clifts name went out on a list and was spread far and wide, but if she had changed countries would she have been followed? I don't have an answer, but targets like Jesus Mendez, Gloria Naylor, and so many others report leaving, country, moving, moving again, and it's the same thing. Same coordination, same gaslighting, same systemic approach to the monitoring.

What we are looking at is a conspiracy, and it goes deep, and it is systemic. I have no doubts on this, proving it will be a bit of a longer road yet. Great strides have been made, and will continue to be made, God willing, people willing, etc.

For many of us however we just want our lives to get back to normal, whatever that is. Will using the methods Jane Clift used work? I don't know, but it can't hurt to try. As far as getting people to believe you, getting legal representation involved, then I don't see why you can't use this, it's close enough that if people don't look to deeply, they won't know the difference. If you stick to the main points, leave out some of the gaslighting stuff, focus on the facts. Such registries exist, innocent people are being placed on them, investigations are happening, their lives are being disrupted, it's a start.

For us who have lived this, we know the difference, this goes deeper. This is systemic, has been for sometime now, and people continue to be turned into informants for the state. They continue to have to be a part of the life disruption process that targets are harmed by. With the targeting we experience, it's deep. 24/7 surveillance, neighbours on all sides monitoring, some get construction projects, street theater, psychological manovours that are used to try to destroy our lives. Our friends, families, co-workers, neighbors, customers, are all co-opted. I have worked at jobs where I was dealing with customers from multiple countries, and it's the same thing. To even broach the subject sounds crazy, schizo crazy, that is the word right, but it's not crazy, and it's been like this for some time.

I have talked to enough people, but seen enough to know that I am correct in this, but do what works for you, this game has been about what we can prove, well targets, we have the ACLU stating investigations are happening.

Mass Con-Fusion

You mean to tell me that it is legal for corporations from the private sector to team up with local law enforcement officials in efforts to spy on innocent members of our society? You also mean to tell me that the synthesis of law enforcement authority and the drive of for-profit companies operate under little to no guidelines or restrictions and it is unclear to whom they are responsible to? [/quote]

We know that employees, councils, school officials, etc, can open or get people placed on monitoring lists. Proving the gaslighting and other psychological ops, or that they were designed to eliminate targets of the state, is another story. Do what works for your personal situation, always continue to do your own research.

For now I am calling these lists our fraternal twins. We are never told we are on lists, she moved and I think some of the harassment might have stopped, but she had information that many of us do not have, and I have no proof that her targeting went as deep as ours. I do however have good reason to believe that some would like the world to think that this was the extent of the targeting. It's not. There are complete strangers following targets, little citizen informants that take turns doing everything to harass targets, people using their children in these skits, etc.

Though it's not uncommon for a community to get together to get rid of a trouble maker or a dangerous person, this targeting goes wherever a person goes. 24/7, and the goal is to completely destroy the person. Don't think doctors, or psychiatrists would take part in things like that? Guess again.

[quote]WASHINGTON – When the CIA began what it called an “increased pressure phase” with captured terrorist suspect Abu Zubaida in the summer of 2002, its first step was to limit the detainee’s human contact to just two people. One was the CIA interrogator, the other a psychologist.

During the extraordinary weeks that followed, it was the psychologist who apparently played the more critical role. According to newly released Justice Department documents, the psychologist provided ideas, practical advice and even legal justification for interrogation methods that would break Abu Zubaida, physically and mentally. Extreme sleep deprivation, waterboarding, the use of insects to provoke fear — all were deemed acceptable, in part because the psychologist said so.

“No severe mental pain or suffering would have been inflicted,” a Justice Department lawyer said in a 2002 memo explaining why waterboarding, or simulated drowning, should not be considered torture.

The sleep deprivation that we get due to the harassment, so we can have car accidents, or lash out. The psychologist provided ideas. I bet. Practical advise on how to torture someone, what would be most effective, and even legal advise and justification. Justification for human torture. If they would do this to them, what about us?

A psychologist providing information on what would break someone. The use of insects to provoke fear. No different, than when they sensitize a target and use that to make the person look like they are very sensitive or crazy. These are the type of people helping to run the zoo.

Waterboarding was touted as particularly useful because it was “reported to be almost 100 percent effective in producing cooperation,” the memo said.

The agency then used a psychological assessment of Abu Zubaida to find his vulnerable points. One of them, it turns out, was a severe aversion to bugs.

“He appears to have a fear of insects,” states the memo, which describes a plan to place a caterpillar or similar creature inside a tiny wooden crate in which Abu Zubaida was confined. CIA officials say the plan was never carried out.

So if instead of bugs, he had an aversion to keys jangling, they would have used that, and it was the psychologists job to go in, probably build trust and find this out. So if this is what they deem legal, and they are supposedly held in high esteem, what about those who are held in lower esteem, would they do worst then?

Just proof that psychologists, would willingly be part of something like that. So proving some parts of our struggles remain, exposing this system for what it is, it's already exposed, it's just getting people to believe it, and accept it.

In situations like the Buzzsaw, there were no violent incidents, that's another close cousin that we have, but it's just one more branch of a systemic practice, that is being used to destroy and silence people.

Prophetically, an acquaintance coolly said to me a year after I left the lab, “You are in a police net you will never get out of … for the rest of your life.” She was right, but I no longer care because now I am not afraid.

We are controlled by our fears until we have none left, and that happens when there is nothing left to lose. The journey to that realization took 12 years of pain, a sense of loss and humiliation, a feeling of abandonment and the lifelong emptiness and absence of being loved—not by any-one, not at any time. The experience and purpose of being mobbed, and what I did not known the isolation of the experience, is that I was not alone.“Mobbing” is the purposeful and strategic institutional gathering of all information about an individual by using any method—legal or illegal. Contact for this purpose is made with neighbors, classmates, former partners, family members, former employers, teachers, church members, good friends and even your family tree … everything must be known about the support system around you that makes your life possible. The assessment of strategic resources and future income (finances, mobility, cars, insur-ance, credit cards, bank safety deposit boxes, post office boxes, wills, health records, birth

Page 3
Uncovering the Truth About Depleted Uranium49certificates, transcripts and photographs) is made without your knowledge. The purpose ofmobbing is to drive the target individual out of the job force for the rest of their life; the big-ger goal is to drive them to the ultimate self-destruction: suicide. There are now laws made by European unions to prevent this cancer on society and productivity, but it is practically unknown in the U.S.The University of California, which had contributed so much to the State of California and to the global community through the benefits of education, had become a pathologi-cally dysfunctional institution through its mobbing practices.

I learned that more than 500 women and minorities had filed lawsuits against the University of California and had then experienced retaliation by the University of California apparatus of mobbing by employees, alumni and law enforcement.1The lawsuits were for denial of tenure, whistleblower retaliation and theft of intel-lectual property. These women had similar complaints about the destruction of their own lives and careers. The information gathered by the University of California is used to takeyour life apart; to destroy all that makes you feel safe; to bankrupt, isolate and alienate you from society and from yourself; and to attempt to make you look crazy.

Your children are harassed, they come home with belongings missing and stories of teachers harassing them and a weirdness takes over your lives. Slowly, documents disappeared from my house; porncharges appeared on my credit card; files, my purse and my keys disappeared; mail was lost. I was forced to carry my documents with me at all times. All of my university transcripts and diplomas have been stolen from my house.Two things kept me going and kept me alive. First, the warrior mother spirit guided me to protect Zephyr. That miracle of life taught me what it means to love unconditionally and completely. I began to learn to love myself. Second, my uncle had told me long ago, “No one can destroy you. Only you can destroy yourself.”


500 Additional cases that she was aware of, the majority woman, all to keep them silent. Please read over the other stories in the above link, and you will see what I mean by systemic.

A great pdf, where woman talk about their harassment, and you see a pattern with lawyers, doctors, tribunals, etc. Systemic.

[quote]Many targets of bullying report that they seem to be obstructed every step of the way in their pursuit of justice. The management refuse to investigate, or use an untrained investigator, or whitewash the case. The union refuses to help, or initially shows interest but suddenly changes sides. The solicitor initially shows interest but then starts acting in a manner which suggests they have the other side's interests at heart rather than yours.

The employer's lawyers apply for, and obtain, adjournment after adjournment, then obtain a pre-hearing review which the tribunal chairman handles in favour of the employer. In the tribunal, favour is shown to the respondent (employer) and you get the impression that the verdict has been decided in advance. Your solicitor, the respondent's lawyers and the tribunal chairman seem to know more about your case than you think they should.

After the tribunal you're left with no option but to privately sue the employer, the union, and your solicitor, and appeal the tribunal decision, but by this time you have no job, no income, your savings are gone, so is your health, maybe your marriage too, and there's no prospect of ever being employed again, especially in the professions.

Sound familiar? If so, you might be surprised to realise how often this happens. Mostly it's in cases from the education sector, although it may happen in any public sector case, for example the NHS. Occasionally, but less often, it happens in private sector cases, and in rare cases from the voluntary sector.

Although there's never any substantive proof, it seems that all the parties arrayed against you have been colluding in secret. The question is, what allegiance binds these individuals together, and where could they meet such that the normal rules of confidentiality do not apply? What fraternal obligation places their duty to support and protect each other above the moral, ethical and legal obligations by which the rest of us are bound?

Employers, unions, law firms, and employees of the justice system are part of society, and every group, professional or otherwise, contains a few poor performers and rotten apples. This ranges from inexperience through ineptitude and incompetence to collusion and corruption.


Many have touched on this. Tim Field passed away, before he could finish the research into the collusion. He was very smart, and had a large following with his bullying movement.

Anyways, it's systemic, but each piece of the puzzle, helps our cause, that's what it's all about, gathering evidence. I think within the last week, a lot of really good material has come out, material that can help targets to get some relief from what is happening.

So again, I would stress awareness and exposure as our two key elements for fighting this. Awareness to the public friends family. Exposure, if you are being bothered bring up the fact that it's now common knowledge that registries like the violent persons registry exist, and that innocent people are being placed on it, bring up the fact that the ACLU says investigations are happening, without any clarity of who takes care of what. Bring up the fact that there are national, regional, and local linked databases, that are being shared across country lines. Bring up mobbing, the human flesh search engine, use the info that is out there, that has been presented to make your case, and to expose your cause. I can't guarantee you will win, but you will make a great case, and these people do not hold up well to scrutiny or to the light.

Do what works best for your own situation, if you read something and it does not sound right, research on your own, I always stress this point, maybe you will catch something that another has missed.

I leave you with the scene from my cousin Vinny. If you have not seen the video, watch it, it's very good.


Mona Lisa Vito: 'Cause Chevy didn't make a 327 in '55, the 327 didn't come out till '62. And it wasn't offered in the Bel Air with a four-barrel carb till '64. However, in 1964, the correct ignition timing would be four degrees before top-dead-center.

Jim Trotter: Well... um... she's acceptable, Your Honor.

Vinny Gambini: Ms. Vito, it has been argued by me, the defense, that two sets of guys met up at the Sac-O-Suds, at the same time, driving identical metallic mint green 1964 Buick Skylark convertibles. Now, can you tell us by what you see in this picture, if the defense's case holds water?

[Lisa examines the picture]

Vinny Gambini: Ms. Vito, please answer the question: does the defense's case hold water?

Mona Lisa Vito: No! The defense is wrong!

Vinny Gambini: Are you sure?

Mona Lisa Vito: I'm positive.

Vinny Gambini: How could you be so sure?

Mona Lisa Vito: Because there is no way that these tire marks were made by a '64 Buick Skylark convertible. These marks were made by a 1963 Pontiac Tempest.

Jim Trotter: Objection, Your Honor! Can we clarify to the court whether the witness is stating opinion or fact?

Judge Chamberlain Haller: This is your opinion?

Mona Lisa Vito: It's a fact!

Vinny Gambini: I find it hard to believe that this kind of information could be ascertained simply by looking at a picture!

Mona Lisa Vito: Would you like me to explain?

Vinny Gambini: I would love to hear this!

Judge Chamberlain Haller: So would I.

Mona Lisa Vito: The car that made these two, equal-length tire marks had positraction. You can't make those marks without positraction, which was not available on the '64 Buick Skylark!

Vinny Gambini: And why not? What is positraction?

Mona Lisa Vito: It's a limited slip differential which distributes power equally to both the right and left tires. The '64 Skylark had a regular differential, which, anyone who's been stuck in the mud in Alabama knows, you step on the gas, one tire spins, the other tire does nothing.
[the jury members nod, with murmurs of "yes," "that's right," etc]

Vinny Gambini: Is that it?

Mona Lisa Vito: No, there's more! You see? When the left tire mark goes up on the curb and the right tire mark stays flat and even? Well, the '64 Skylark had a solid rear axle, so when the left tire would go up on the curb, the right tire would tilt out and ride along its edge. But that didn't happen here. The tire mark stayed flat and even. This car had an independent rear suspension. Now, in the '60's, there were only two other cars made in America that had positraction, and independent rear suspension, and enough power to make these marks. One was the Corvette, which could never be confused with the Buick Skylark. The other had the same body length, height, width, weight, wheel base, and wheel track as the '64 Skylark, and that was the 1963 Pontiac Tempest.

Vinny Gambini: And because both cars were made by GM, were both cars available in metallic mint green paint?

Mona Lisa Vito: They were!

Vinny Gambini: Thank you, Ms. Vito. No more questions. Thank you very, very much.

[kissing her hands]

Vinny Gambini: You've been a lovely, lovely witness.

Vinny Gambini: Mr. Wilbur, how'd you like Ms. Vito's testimony?

George Wilbur: Very impressive.

Vinny Gambini: She's cute too, huh?

George Wilbur: Yes, very.

Judge Chamberlain Haller: Mr. Gambini...

Vinny Gambini: Sorry, Your Honor.

Vinny Gambini: Sheriff Farley, uh... what'd you find out?
Sheriff Dean Farley: On a hunch, I took it upon myself to check out if there was any information on a '63 Pontiac Tempest stolen or abandoned recently. This computer readout confirms that two boys, who fit the defendants' description, were arrested two days ago by Sheriff Tillman in Jasper County, Georgia, for driving a stolen metallic mint green 1963 Pontiac Tempest, with a white convertible top, Michelin Model XGV tires, size 75-R-14.

Vinny Gambini: Is that it?

Sheriff Dean Farley: No. A .357 Magnum revolver was found in their possession.

Vinny Gambini: Sheriff Farley, just to refresh the court's memory, what caliber bullet was used to murder Jimmy Willis?
Sheriff Dean Farley: .357 Magnum.

Vinny Gambini: The defense rests.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, October 12, 2009

Woman placed on Violent Offenders Registry

I am really happy about this story. I did not know there was a potentially "violent person registry." I don't know what the names would be in Canada, U.S. or Europe, but it should not be hard to find out.

Think of this scenario in the workplace, at school, etc. You make a comment, or perform an action that might upset someone with the capacity to get you on such a list, and then an notice is sent out to several dozen places that you are a potentially violent person who should not be alone with others, and then your life changes.

Here is some really neat info from this article.

I was turned into a Parriah for complaining about a yob

[quote]Jane Clift saw it as her public duty to report a drunk she saw trampling flowers in a park.

But her efforts led to a surreal nightmare in which she was branded potentially violent and put on a council blacklist with thugs and sex attackers.

Her details were circulated to an extraordinary range of public and private bodies, including doctors, dentists, opticians, libraries, contraceptive clinics, schools and nurseries. Their staff were advised not to see her alone.

The 43-year-old former care worker was forced to withdraw an application to become a foster parent and, eventually, to leave the town where she had lived for ten years.

Now, after a bitter four-year legal battle with Slough Council, the stain on her character has finally been removed.[/quote]

A list that put her up there with sex attackers if you can imagine that.

She was a care worker, and got denied fostering a child because of this.

Woman sues council for libel after being labelled
'potentially violent' for complaining about a vandalised flowerbed

[quote]Ms Clift told the court that she had to leave Slough, where she had lived for 10 years, and had initially moved to Southampton.

'I'd like to move back some time in the near future but without this hanging over my head and my family's head.

'I have many connections in Slough, I like Slough, but it was impossible for me to function normally in Slough with this on my head for 18 months, and the stain will always be there.'

She said that after the council acted, she sensed that everywhere she went, there was 'whispering, collaboration, people scurrying about'.

'One time I went to the contraceptive clinic and I felt that there were way too many people hovering about for me than should have been there, making me feel very insecure.

'It did serve as a reminder that everywhere I went - hospitals, GPs, libraries - anywhere at all, even if I phoned the fire service, as soon as my name went on to that system, it flagged up 'violent person marker, only to be seen in twos, medium risk'.'

'I'm nothing special, no qualifications, don't have a fancy job but I don't go getting into trouble. It cuts across class, race, everything.

'These people have this ability to do this and they can abuse it.
Not many people know, I didn't even know, that such a register existed.[/quote]

She sensed that everywhere she went there was a whispering and collaboration campaign, with people scurrying about. She also goes on to say more people were hovering about than should have been there, making her feel insecure. I am sure that I have another word for what they were doing, but to continue.

Woman Placed on Violent persons registry
Woman labelled violent by Slough borough council wins damages

[quote]A woman who was labelled potentially violent by a council has won £12,000 in libel damages.

Jane Clift sued Slough borough council and Patrick Kelleher, its head of public protection, over their reaction to her complaint about a three-year-old boy who vandalised a flower bed in a town park.

The authority argued that a 2005 entry about her in its violent persons register was accurate, and that Clift was obsessed with getting Slough's antisocial behaviour co-ordinator sacked.

Mr Justice Tugendhat found in favour of Clift at the high court, but rejected her claim that Kelleher had been malicious.[/quote]

She had to move and it took four years to get her name removed from this list.

I was just pointing that out, because I am sure that the policy on these lists is not to give our information to the person being placed on the lists.

Staff Safety (Potentially Violent Persons) Database
employees and others arising from their work activities.

3. Purpose

The purpose of this document is to alert Directorates to their statutory duties and of the corporate information system designed to enable managers to identify potential risks to employees from individuals, animals and premises. The purpose of the recording is to seek to avoid further incidents through the controlled sharing of information that will be used to undertake a better-informed risk assessment of proposed visits by employees.

5. Definitions

The Staff safety register is a secure electronic based database recording incidents involving an employee of DMBC (or partner agency) that have caused actual or potential harm.

6. Policy

It is Doncaster Council policy to ensure the health, safety and welfare of its employees and therefore managers must utilise the staff safety database to achieve this objective.

7. Responsibilities


All managers in day-to-day control of people, places etc must ensure that risk assessments are completed and are suitable and sufficient for their purpose. Managers must ensure that the significant findings arising from risk assessments are communicated to employees affected by those work activities. For the purposes of this section the work activity relates to visits by Council employees away from Council premises. See Instruction section for detailed Risk assessment.

Senior managers who, after notification of an incident to one of their employees, believe that person(s) and/ or an address now need to be included onto the staff safety register then they must notify the system manager of that decision at the earliest opportunity.

To comply with Data Protection Act 1988 if the manager decides to include a person onto the register then that person must be informed in writing of the intention to do so, the reason for their inclusion and the arrangements for review and removal. The right of appealing against that decision must also be provided.


Employees who undertake visits to non-Council premises must utilise the Staff safety register to ascertain if the location of the proposed visit is included in the register as a potential to cause harm.

Principal Safety Officer

The Principal Safety Officer as system manager has the ability to create, amend and delete data and to ensure appropriate an advisory/ training service is available to all employees with responsibilities under these instructions. The PSO must ensure that the system is managed and staffed appropriately.

8. Instructions

System Access – Three levels of access are available and a clear level of authorisation will control the granting of each. All levels of direct access to data will be password controlled and the staff safety register itself will record details of every access, including the data viewed and the reason for access.

8.1. Level 1 Access- Basic Interrogation

An email (external email facility) based enquiry function, which tests whether a name or address is registered. Appropriate staff will be specifically authorised to use this function.

8.2. Level 2 Access- View Only

The ability to view data on the software system (software installed on individual pc’s). Only a limited number of managers will be given this access. Where a level 1 user identifies a match from the email system a Level 2 user will obtain the relevant information from the software system and carry out a risk assessment for a visit to the premises and advise accordingly.

Interesting, I bet every single little Human Resources officer knows about this list. It goes hand in hand with make a stink go see a shrink policy they have in their handbook.

The next day, the plant director of human resources invoked a Ford program for combating workplace violence to bar Crosty from the factory and ordered him to see a company-paid psychiatrist or lose his job.

A little more than fourteen months later, and 725 miles away, officials at Emory University cited a similar concern about violence to justify using armed guards to escort Dr. James Murtagh off university property when Dr. R. Wayne Alexander, chairman of the department of medicine at Emory, ordered him to see a company-selected psychiatrist or lose his job. Six weeks earlier, Murtagh, a professor of pulmonology at Emory, had filed a false claims suit against the university, alleging that it had misspent millions of dollars in federal grant money. He claimed the university diverted money from research grants in order to pay for salaries and trips for administrators and some staff. The specific allegations were sealed by order of the federal judge.

Crosty and Murtagh don't know each other. It is unlikely their worlds would ever intersect, but they have at least one thing in common. They both are victims of an increasingly popular employer weapon against whistleblowers: the psychiatric reprisal.

Across the United States, companies have seized upon concerns about workplace violence to quash dissent. Hundreds of large corporations have hired psychiatrists and psychologists as consultants to advise them on how to weed out "threatening" employees. They say they are only responding to a 1970 directive from the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration that they maintain a "safe and secure work environment." But by drawing the definition of "threatening" as broadly as possible, they are giving themselves a new club to bang over the heads of workers.

So in the workplace I am guessing this could be applied for a number of reasons, and then you end up on these little connected lists.

132 – Violent Persons Register

Referring to Minute No. 125 – Violent Persons Register, John Irving from the COPS Team had attended the meeting and gave the following advice:

To hold a register of violent or potentially violent people on computer, the information could be de-personalised by using a classification system i.e.: 1 = Potentially violent, 2 = Threatened people before, 3 = Been violent in the past, 4 = Two-man visit, 5 = Don’t Visit.


132 – Continued…

The Legal Services Administrator would compile a Violent Persons Database, which would be put on the Council’s Intranet system, and would be password protected. John Irving suggested that as a long-term goal, once the database had been established it would be useful to share the information with Liberata, District Nurses etc.

The Legal Services Administrator also needed to write a procedure to ensure that the Council didn’t fall foul of the Data Protection Act. It was agreed that addresses couldn’t be put onto the Violent Persons Register without proper clarification. It was suggested that a sub-group to this Group be set up to endorse these requests.

Minutes of the meeting from a local booby. How to really mess up someones life. I mean how to share information of violent persons.

Well just some fun food for thought. Tell me what you think, leave comments if you feel like it.

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, October 09, 2009

Indigo Ribbon Quilt

Indigo Ribbon Quilt

November is right around the corner, and that is the month that we celebrate Indigo Ribbon Day. So if you have any stories that you would like to share, or ideas for this years Indigo Ribbon Day, please feel free to submit your stories to Gang Stalking World.

Last year there was not much of an Indigo Ribbon Day. The articles that came out in the New York Times and Washington post too the focus away from the event last year, but the articles were important to be responded to. The rest of the year has been spent Bridging the Gap between what the general public understands and what we understand. Getting them up to speed. I think there has been enough information over the last year, that some of the gaps have been filled, now it's just getting that information out to the public, which targets, local media can play a great role in. The information finally is there, it's a matter of getting it out there in greater capacity.

Most of yesterday was spent working on the quilt. It's one of events that was hoped for with the Indigo Ribbon Awareness Campaign and now it's finally been started.

Starting on the quilt was emotional. Remembering stories like Jeremy Blake, Teresa Duncan, Ruth Goodman, Kyle, even the Jiverly Wong quilt was hard, because some of these people will never get justice for what was done to them. With Jiverly Wong it's important that individuals like him have a voice, and they be remembered because despite their actions, I don't believe that people like him, and Kimveer Gill were killers, or would have been without external forces. I believe just like what we see with the workplace mobbing shootings these individuals were driven to their ends. I am deeply sorry for their victims, but before they became what some would call monsters, they were victims of the state, and that has to be acknowledged if we are to stop future events like that from happening. That is why they must be included in the quilt.

Anyways, I hope for more uplifting stories, but getting started was interesting.

Indigo Ribbon Products


You can find Indigo Ribbon and related products by clicking on the image above.

Indigo Ribbon

The Indigo Ribbon Campaign is meant to be a voice to the many innocent targets of Government campaigns, mobbing, Gang Stalking, mind control, Electronic Harassment, etc. The idea behind the campaign is to provide information and awareness.

This year the campaign will focus on a quilt, it's a quilt to commensurate those that have died, those in jail, falsely placed in mental institutions, driven to suicide, murdered, etc.

Only by continuing to make others aware, can we begin to make a difference.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

Gang Stalking, Cyber Vigilantes, Mobbing, Cellphone Stalking

Ever since researching the Human Flesh Search Engine people are probably a little confused. What is the difference between something like that and Gang Stalking?

Well I thought that this would be a good time to briefly go over some of the harassment's that are similar, and what the differences are. If I have forgotten anything forgive me in advance.


-Subtle and Covert. Mobbing has many aspects similar to Gang Stalking. The emotional and psychological abuse that the Targeted Individual suffers is very similar to what targets of workplace mobbing suffer. On this level the mobbing community are our closest relations, and this is why Gang Stalking has also been termed community mobbing by some.

[quote]Mobbing can be understood as the stressor to beat all stressors. It is an impassioned, collective campaign by co-workers to exclude, punish, and humiliate a targeted worker. Initiated most often by a person in a position of power or influence, mobbing is a desperate urge to crush and eliminate the target. The urge travels through the workplace like a virus, infecting one person after another. The target comes to be viewed as absolutely abhorrent, with no redeeming qualities, outside the circle of acceptance and respectability, deserving only of contempt. As the campaign proceeds, a steadily larger range of hostile ploys and communications comes to be seen as legitimate. …

Not infrequently, mobbing spelled the end of the target’s career, marriage, health, and livelihood. From a study of circumstances surrounding suicides in Sweden, Leymann estimated that about twelve percent of people who take their own lives have recently been mobbed at work.”

~ Kenneth Westhues, Professor of Sociology[/quote]

Mobbing can be ongoing for years, it can cause health problems, and can even cause the targets to become violent, or have emotional breakdowns. Mobbing is hard to prove, and changing jobs might stop the mobbing, but it may not. Mobbing can cause you to be blacklisted from your field of employment.

Cellphone Stalking

-This is an overt form of harassment that involves 24/7 surveillance . The targets cell or cameraphones are used to track and monitor them 24/7.

Emotionally it's stressing to the targets just like Gang Stalking, but with cellphone stalking and the overt nature of the harassment, targets often have evidence to present to the police. Also the targets could get rid of their phones to stop the harassment.

Human Flesh Search Engine

-This is often overt and swift. In Korea it's called Cyber Violence, and in America it's called Cyber Violence.

[quote]Human flesh search engines: Chinese vigilantes that hunt victims on the web
A new phenomenon is sweeping China after the quake: digital witch hunts of those who dare to be outspoken or criticise [/quote]

[quote]Ms Wang’s Chinese name, Chinese identification number and contact details in America were tracked down and posted across the internet. She received hate mail and threats that if ever she returned to China, she would be “chopped into 10,000 pieces”. Her parents’ address in China was published and they were forced to go into hiding.

Tibetans have also been targeted. After 44-year-old Lobsang Gendun was photographed protesting at the Olympic torch relay in London, Paris and San Francisco, the human flesh search engine whirred into action.

With huge overseas communities, it took just a couple of hours for Chinese web users to collate the pieces of Mr Gendun’s life – replete with Google satellite map and photos of his American home.

“I suggest assassination,” wrote one poster. “Execution by shooting,” said another. No, no, insisted yet another: “Use China’s most ancient form of execution – dismember him.”

In an unfortunate case of mistaken identity, it turned out there was another exiled Tibetan called Lobsang Gendun living in Utah. Since the targeting of his namesake began, Mr Gendun, a self-proclaimed “Olympic supporter”, has received hundreds of aggressive emails and telephone calls. [/quote]

The speed to which the vigilantes can mount an attack is amazing, not just in China, but in Korea and America as well.

[quote]The digital age allows critics to quickly find a fair amount of information about their targets. One day last November, at about 11:30 a.m., a blog focused on making New York streets more bike-friendly posted the license plate number of an SUV driver who allegedly accelerated from a dead stop to hit a bicycle blocking his way.

At 1:16 p.m., someone posted the registration information for the license plate, including the SUV owner's name and address. (The editor of the blog thinks the poster got the information from someone who had access to a license-plate look-up service, available to lawyers, private investigators and police.) At 1:31 p.m., another person added the owner's occupation, his business's name and his title. Ten minutes later, a user posted a link to an aerial photo of the owner's house. Within another hour, the posting also included the accused's picture and email address.

The SUV's owner, Ian Goldman, the chief executive of Celerant Technology Corp. in the New York City borough of Staten Island, declined to comment for this article. According to an email exchange posted on the blog, Mr. Goldman said that he had lent the vehicle in question to a relative with "an urgent medical situation" and that he was not aware of any incident. The alleged victim has decided to drop the matter since the damage to the bicycle, which he was standing next to at the time, was under $20. Last month, Aaron Naparstek, editor of the blog, says he removed Mr. Goldman's home and email addresses from the site after receiving a "lawyerly cease and desist" email asking that the whole posting be deleted.[/quote]

This is in America and I see very little difference to some of the stories that happened in China.

Here is one more from Korea where they call it cyber violence, or online Mobbing.

[quote]EOUL Kim Myong Jae’s estranged girlfriend was found dead in her room in Seoul on April 22 last year, six days after she poisoned herself.

Two weeks later, Kim, a 30-year-old accountant, found that he had been transformed into the No. 1 hate figure of South Korea’s Internet community, a victim of a growing problem in a country that boasts the world’s highest rate of broadband use.

First, death threats and vicious text messages flooded his cellphone. Meanwhile, spreading fast through blogs and Web portals were rumors that Kim had jilted his girlfriend after forcing her to abort his baby, that he had assaulted her and her mother, and that his abuse had finally driven her to suicide.

“By the time I found out the source of this outrage, it was too late. My name, address, photographs, telephone numbers were all over the Internet,” Kim said. “Tens of thousands of people were busy sharing my identity and discussing how to punish me. My name was the most-searched phrase at portals.” News reports and portals confirmed that his name was at the top of such lists.[/quote]

The next time someone tells you that people would not waste the time in harassing others, or stalking others, just smile knowingly and point to these articles.


-This is often covert and done over a period of time, and the goal is to drive the person crazy, or to freak them out, or give them a breakdown.

[quote]Gaslighting is a form of intimidation or psychological abuse in which false information is presented to the victim, making them doubt their own memory and perception. The classic example of gaslighting is to change things in a person's environment without their knowledge, and to explain that they "must be imagining things" when they challenge these changes. Popular usage of the term can be traced to at least the late 1970s.[1]

The term derives from the 1938 stage play Gas Light, in which a wife's concerns about the dimming of her house's gas lights are dismissed by her husband as the work of her imagination, when he has actually caused the lights to dim. His action is part of a wider pattern of deception in which the husband manipulates small elements of his wife's environment, and insists that she is mistaken or misremembering, hoping to drive her to insanity.
[edit] Use in real life

An example of gaslighting being used in real life was by the Manson Family during their "creepy crawler" burglaries during which nothing was stolen, but furniture in the house was rearranged[2].[/quote]

Apparently this is an ongoing storyline. However if you want to see a really good storyline look up Drucilla being Gaslighted, also from the same soap opera, but from a few years ago. That was so well done, that the character ended up in a mental ward. It was a wonderful example of Gaslighting. I have not seen the Ashley storyline yet.

Gang Stalking

-Covert and ongoing. On an emotional and psychological level this is very similar to mobbing.

[quote]Bridging The Gap is a disturbing, yet poignant look into modern day democratic surveillance societies. The book examines how this structure is used to discredit, disenfranchise, and destroy innocent citizens. Gang Stalking, The Buzzsaw, Cointelpro, what do these words mean and more importantly what do they have in common? They are names that have been used to describe the systemic apparatus that reaches out to destroy and discredit those declared enemy by the state. This book will open your eyes to how the informant system has taken over these democratic countries, and how they are being used to further create a surveillance society where no one will be out of reach, should they too become persona non grata by the system.[/quote]

I would say it's a tie between stasi Germany and what happened under Cointelpro, however Stasi Germany probably most mirrors what is happening now.

-ACLU Investigations

[quote]Mass Con-Fusion

You mean to tell me that it is legal for corporations from the private sector to team up with local law enforcement officials in efforts to spy on innocent members of our society? You also mean to tell me that the synthesis of law enforcement authority and the drive of for-profit companies operate under little to no guidelines or restrictions and it is unclear to whom they are responsible to?[/quote]


[quote]COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception, however formal COINTELPRO operations took place between 1956 and 1971.[2] The FBI's stated motivation at the time was "protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order[/quote]


[quote]The Ministry for State Security, (German: Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, commonly known as the Stasi [ˈʃtazi] (abbreviation German: Staatssicherheit, literally State Security), was the official secret police of East Germany. The MfS was headquartered in East Berlin, with an extensive complex in Berlin-Lichtenberg and several smaller facilities throughout the city. It was widely regarded as one of the most effective and repressive intelligence and secret police agencies in the world. The MfS motto was "Schild und Schwert der Partei" (Shield and Sword of the Party), showing its connections to the Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED), the equivalent to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.[/quote]


The bigger picture is that the structure functions like a cult does.
In how it keeps the members in line, how they obey and how they punish and try to destroy those outside the cult and those who would leave the cult.

This is just a very quick and brief introduction to this subject matter. To learn more, I suggest doing your own research and reading up on the subject matter.

Labels: , , , , ,

Tuesday, October 06, 2009

How cults work

As I was around the informants, it occurred to me more than ever that they, the informants are being controlled in a similar fashion, to how cults work. Examining how cults work, I think will give a better understanding into how the informants are being controlled. It’s in no way shape or form as obvious, but it’s the same mechanisms that are being used to control the informants.

The system controls, conditions, the same way that a cult would. I think this is worthwhile to understand to understand how they are kept in line, rewarded for obeying, told that we are evil, they are a family in the same way cult members become family. They attack outsiders the same way. As I watched this video, which is a bit older, I could see each theme as it relates to the informants.

How cults work

Others have written about this, but aside from the 5 monkeys video that I posted the other day, this is how they structure it, and the branches of this cult are everywhere. The schools, churches, jobs, etc.

The part in the video where it says establish fronts, reminds me of how society is set up, and most of us usually fall into one of these branches of control throughout our lives.

This is why we see the mobbing, harassment, retaliation at every sector of society as well, and this is in some ways why some of the informants don't see it, those that do are probably in the same situation that cult members who want to leave are. Since this cult is at the core of society, it's a cult that I am guessing is not too easy to leave.

As I watch the video, I wish I could transcribe it, because I can so easily relate it to the informants and what I have seen. Watch the video it's short, but it very informative.

"Make them feel part of an elite group with an important mission"

"Tighten your groups bond by establishing scape goats and enemies"

"Demonize outsiders as less than human. bias, corrupt, or conspiring against the group"

"Develop an us vs them mentality"

On it goes, but I think that it's really interesting. Other targets have looked into this aspect of it, so there is info here, and on others sites about how cults work. No you would not know if you were a part of a cult, and they don't always have anything to do with religion.

"Indoctrinate with fear"

"Suggest that if they should ever leave, something bad could happen to them"

"Without us you are likely to get into a bad accident, get sick, or even die"

"Make it easier for them to die for you, by calling their bodies containers"

I have seen these informants willing to do some stupid things for this cult, and it's little wonder, this video help shed even more light on what the informants experience.

I don't know if this is fully correct, because Anna Funder when she went to East Germany and talked to the Stasi, they said that they had enjoyed it, and they had no remorse, but then maybe it was like a cult as well. I don't know, but this is worth looking into.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, October 04, 2009

It's up to us

Trying to figure out what to do? I am right there with you. I am looking at history, because that is likely in part to have the answers about what to do.

Other people in the past have been enslaved, other times have had people in similar situations. Most recently East Germany and the soviet Union.

I have looked at the past, with the Israelites being enslaved by the Egyptians, a powerful empire, and how they were freed.

The difference with bonded slavery is that people realise that they are slaves. Thy do not grow up falsely believing that they are free.

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." ~Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

I also looked at some more recent examples. I looked at workplace mobbing. This can start off small, but end up like a runaway train, and be almost as impossible to stop.

However what it takes to stop mobbing is apparently not some heroic feat, but something very simple. According to Professor Kenneth Westhue the way to stop mobbing is not some difficult scheme, but someone usually someone in authority saying, stop it, cut it out.

[quote]Beyond that, Mr. Westhues said, administrators also have more power to halt a mobbing in its tracks.

"You know what stops mobbings?" he asked. "Somebody saying, 'Cut it out. Enough of this!'"[/quote]

I then looked at McCarthyism and what it too to stop that witch hunt and it wasn't some amazing feat. The media stopped the witch hunt, they stopped enabling Joseph McCarthy, and his crazy witch hunt.

Also a news caster named Edward R. Murrow, played a big role in getting society to see what a lying, devious, fink the senator was and that helped to break his hold on society. Not before a lot of damage was done, but it helped., and then Edward R. Murrow challenged him, and he was exposed for the phony that he was, and that is in large part what stopped McCarthyism.

I have heard that the Salem Witch trials finally ended when people started to ignore the claims of witchcraft. They simply did not enable the accusers anymore. Here is some quick wiki background.

[quote]The first three people accused and arrested for allegedly afflicting Betty Parris, Abigail Williams, 12-year-old Ann Putnam, Jr., and Elizabeth Hubbard were Sarah Good, Sarah Osborne, and Tituba.[13] Sarah Good was poor and known to beg for food or shelter from neighbors. Sarah Osborne had sex with her indentured servant and rarely attended church meetings. Tituba, as a slave of a different ethnicity than the Puritans, was an obvious target for accusations. All of these outcast women fit the description of the "usual suspects" for witchcraft accusations, and no one stood up for them.[/quote]

See they go after the undesirables first, but it never stops there. This is a continual theme.

[quote]Governor Phips’ orders, Increase Mather’s statement to the Boston clergy and waning support of the trials soon left the cries of the afflicted to fall on deaf ears. People began to ignore the accusations of the afflicted. The fury of the witch trials subsided, and the last witch trial was held in January 1693. Governor Phips ended the witch trials when he pardoned the remaining accused in May 1693. With this pardon, the Salem witch trials, which resulted in nineteen hangings and a death by crushing rocks, was finally concluded.[/quote]

Not enabling the witch trials was what helped to stop it.

What ended the trials?

Public support and belief in the trials began to wane for several reasons. Respected ministers started to believe that some innocent people were being accused and executed for witchcraft primarily on unreliable spectral evidence. As the Reverend Increase Mather stated, "It were better than ten suspected witches should escape than one innocent person should be condemned." Also, as the accusations mounted, persons from all walks of life--rich and poor, beggar and merchant--were being accused. Additionally, the accused that originally confessed to witchcraft requested to recant their former confessions. With public confidence in the trials slipping, the cries of the afflicted were steadily ignored, and the accusations eventually stopped. [/quote]

See these runaway trains can be stopped, but they must be stopped at the beginning, because if they are stopped after they are allowed to start it is usually after the blood of many innocent have been shed, and it's always up to us, to stop it.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, October 01, 2009

Police Respond to Gang Stalking

After going over some other details, I found the information to be inconclusive, so I will post the links, but I won't embed the videos.

The following video is dated Sept 05 2009. Anyways I assume that the video was made recently and is a new video, but I don't know that for sure.

In the video a guy in a police outfit, who I assumed to be an officer describes the target opening th door as out of the ordinary behaviour. However it's out of th ordinary based on his life experiences, she could have many reasons that are sane and logical for having a video camera running, one of which could be a deep distrust of the police.

Again what's always interesting is that these experiences are being judged based on a third parties life experience. What if she had been robbed after opening the door, or attacked, and just felt safer having the camera?

He finds it odd because the camera is in her hands, what if she was just recording them without the camera in hand?

Why is it any of his business if she has a blanket or foil in her home? He is there to talk to her about a complaint that someone made so does he actually end up doing so?

She should really just stick to the topic, find out why they are there, I am not even sure why she let them in. I find it interesting that they are there for a report about her taking pictures, but the whole think is about sterotyping target instead, and the whole video never goes back to the reason they were there.

I find it interesting that after 1min and 11 second officer PHD can make a mental health assessment, he must be freakin amazing. He tells the woman in the video that she is displaying delusions of grandeur and delusions of persecution, because she opened the door to them with a video camera and because he sees foil?

Watch the video for yourself and make your own assessment of this officer.

So after 1 min and 31 second again he sees signs of mental illness, in the video if it's a real video and not another informant video, he never mentions about the original reason that they allegedly came knocking at this woman's door. Again two strange men in her home, she by herself, I say keep the video camera running.

I don't know if there is more to this video, but that was interesting.

The other video this woman pretend to go upstarirs to one of her neighbours and then knocking on the neighbours door. At one point she tells the neighbour that it's not in her head. I think instead of doing that, record the noises and the banging and then just go to the management office, with a complaint about the enjoyment of your apartment being interrupted due to noises after hours. Highlight the part of your lease that pertains to this, and then if it continues legal action, but they don't like exposure so that should get it stopped.

This woman in the video says that she lives in a condo, and that there is an asain guy who lives in another condo who is also a target, who is investigating Gang Stalking.

The other video was of the police cutting this woman off while she is driving. It's inconclusive, but again with being targeted it's the overall picture.

The last tape is of her video taping the downtown core, and she talks about some guy with a camera. First she was taking him, then he showed up and started taping her. The video however has no sound, so I just found it very there, till the guy showed up with the camera. The problem is there is no sound. So the audience does not really know what is being said.

On Youtube I have seen videos with no sound, and the narrator tells you what is happening, but you can't always trust what is being said. I find this part of the video odd. The informants don't usually engage the targets to this degree, however anything is possible. Again you have to be careful with youtube, that's why I stopped posting video like this in the first place.

Anyways it's been a long time since I did a post about Targets. I think Dave in Dublin was my last post about the Irish target.

I also found some spoof videos of Gang Stalking, they were funny.

The interesting point of this video for me was the fact that the officers could tell this woman that she was showing signs of mental illness for opening the door with a camera, and for having blankets and foil in her home in reference to an EMF sensitivity, which the officer knew nothing about.

This video is interesting because it brings me back to my investigations into Gang Stalking and when I first started investigating this. I was lucky enough to talk to a few police officers. One was useful in providing information that in one area in his division there had been five reports of Gang Stalking, and that they were all female, and single living by themselves.

This was interesting because again it matched what had been reported about single females and the disproportionate amount of targeting that might be happening to them.

I did not get into further demographics with the officer, though I wish I would have. What he did tell me however is that their reports of stalking had been written off as paranoia, and not taken seriously. I mentioned this before, but think about that, 5 single women living in the same division, who were reporting the same thing and it was not being taken seriously.

Anyways interesting stuff, provided that this is a real target and not an informant pretending, then I think some of the videos are of interest.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,